{"change_dates":[],"dossier":{"amendments":[],"changes":{"2014-11-10T05:37:28":[{"data":[{"body":"EC","commission":[{"Commissioner":"ASHTON Catherine","DG":"External Relations"}],"date":"1995-02-22T00:00:00","docs":[{"celexid":"CELEX:51995PC0044:EN","text":["
The Lisbon\n Treaty, which entered into force on 1 December 2009, amended the EU's two\n core treaties, the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the Treaty establishing\n the European Community (EC Treaty). The latter was renamed the Treaty on the\n Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
These changes\n had various consequences for many ongoing procedures. First of all, the\n articles of the TEU and of the old EC Treaty that constitute the legal basis\n of all the proposals founded on those Treaties were renumbered in\n accordance with the table of equivalences mentioned in Article 5 of the\n Lisbon Treaty.
In addition,\n some proposals underwent a change to their legal basis going beyond a mere\n change to their numbering, and this resulted in changes to the type of\n procedure.
The Lisbon\n Treaty also introduced new concepts of decision-making procedure. The\n old \"codecision procedure\" was extended to new areas and renamed\n the \"ordinary legislative procedure\". A new \"consent\n procedure\" replaced the old \"assent procedure\". New\n interinstitutional procedures were also set up for the adoption of certain\n non-legislative acts, for example the conclusion of some international\n agreements.
The ongoing\n proposals concerned by these changes were formally modified by the Commission\n in a Communication published on 2 December 2009 (COM(2009)0665).
In the case of\n the proposal for a Council and Commission Decision on the conclusion of the\n Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and\n their Member States of the one part, and the Republic of Belarus, of the\n other part, the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty had the following\n impacts:
· \n the old legal basis – Treaty/EC/Art.181a; Treaty/EC/Art.300(2) 2nd sentence;\n Treaty/EC/Art.300(3) 2nd para; Treaty/EC/Art.44(1); Treaty/EC/Art.57(2);\n Treaty/EC/Art.80(2); Treaty/EC/Art.133; Treaty/EURATOM/Art.101 2nd para;\n Treaty/EC/Art.71; Treaty/EC/Art.47(2) 1st sentence – became Art. 212,\n Art. 218(6)(a), Art. 50(1), Art. 64(2), Art. 100(2), Art. 207, Art. 91, Art.\n 53(1) of the TFEU. Please note that the numbering of the old legal bases\n corresponds to the consolidated versions of the Treaties that were applicable\n immediately before the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, and may differ\n from the references in the original Commission proposal;
· \n the proposal, which had previously fallen\n under the old assent procedure (AVC), was classified as an interinstitutional\n non-legislative procedure (NLE).
\nThe Lisbon\n Treaty, which entered into force on 1 December 2009, amended the EU's two\n core treaties, the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the Treaty establishing\n the European Community (EC Treaty). The latter was renamed the Treaty on the\n Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
These changes\n had various consequences for many ongoing procedures. First of all, the\n articles of the TEU and of the old EC Treaty that constitute the legal basis\n of all the proposals founded on those Treaties were renumbered in\n accordance with the table of equivalences mentioned in Article 5 of the\n Lisbon Treaty.
In addition,\n some proposals underwent a change to their legal basis going beyond a mere\n change to their numbering, and this resulted in changes to the type of\n procedure.
The Lisbon\n Treaty also introduced new concepts of decision-making procedure. The\n old \"codecision procedure\" was extended to new areas and renamed\n the \"ordinary legislative procedure\". A new \"consent\n procedure\" replaced the old \"assent procedure\". New\n interinstitutional procedures were also set up for the adoption of certain\n non-legislative acts, for example the conclusion of some international\n agreements.
The ongoing\n proposals concerned by these changes were formally modified by the Commission\n in a Communication published on 2 December 2009 (COM(2009)0665).
In the case of\n the proposal for a Council and Commission Decision on the conclusion of the\n Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and\n their Member States of the one part, and the Republic of Belarus, of the\n other part, the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty had the following\n impacts:
· \n the old legal basis – Treaty/EC/Art.181a; Treaty/EC/Art.300(2) 2nd sentence;\n Treaty/EC/Art.300(3) 2nd para; Treaty/EC/Art.44(1); Treaty/EC/Art.57(2);\n Treaty/EC/Art.80(2); Treaty/EC/Art.133; Treaty/EURATOM/Art.101 2nd para;\n Treaty/EC/Art.71; Treaty/EC/Art.47(2) 1st sentence – became Art. 212,\n Art. 218(6)(a), Art. 50(1), Art. 64(2), Art. 100(2), Art. 207, Art. 91, Art.\n 53(1) of the TFEU. Please note that the numbering of the old legal bases\n corresponds to the consolidated versions of the Treaties that were applicable\n immediately before the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, and may differ\n from the references in the original Commission proposal;
· \n the proposal, which had previously fallen\n under the old assent procedure (AVC), was classified as an interinstitutional\n non-legislative procedure (NLE).
\n