BETA
Home MEPs Dossiers Committees Subjects Blog About Dumps
download json
This is a historical view (2019/07/12)

Changes: 2023/08/03committees.opinion, events, committees.rapporteur, docs.docs.url, docs, committees.committee_full, committees.committee, 2021/12/18events, docs.docs.url, events.docs.url, docs, events.type, 2020/01/19docs.docs.url, committees.rapporteur.date, events.docs.url, docs, committees.date, 2019/07/12events.docs.url, docs.docs.url

View current state | View Changes for this date



1995/0124(COD) Series of guidelines for trans-European telecommunications networks

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Former Responsible Committee ECON HOPPENSTEDT Karsten Friedrich (icon: PPE PPE)
Former Responsible Committee ECON HOPPENSTEDT Karsten Friedrich (icon: PPE PPE)
Former Committee Opinion ENER IZQUIERDO COLLADO Juan de Dios (icon: PES PES)
Former Committee Opinion JURI
Former Committee Opinion REGI HALLAM David John Alfred (icon: PES PES)
Former Committee Opinion TRAN
Former Committee Opinion ENVI
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
EC before Amsterdam E 129D-p1

Events

1997/07/11
   Final act published in Official Journal
Documents
Decision 1997/1336
OJ L 183 11.07.1997, p. 0012
1997/06/17
   CSL - Final act signed
1997/06/17
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
1997/05/26
   CSL - Decision by Council, 3rd reading
1997/05/26
   CSL - Council Meeting
1997/05/14
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, 3rd reading
Documents
OJ C 167 02.06.1997, p. 0044-0055
T4-0225/1997
1997/05/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 3rd reading
Documents
T4-0225/1997
1997/05/13
   EP - Debate in Parliament
Details

The rapporteur welcomed the successful conclusion of the conciliation procedure and commented that, even though the budget would not permit any major strides forward, it would contribute to the development of the information society. He was also delighted that the revision of the ‘lists of projects of common interest’ would occur before 31 December 2001. Within this revision, priority should still be given to generic services and to telematics for the environment and health. The rapporteur stressed once again that the problem of satellite services should be tackled better in the future. While qualifying the compromise reached between Parliament and Council as very good, Mr Bangemann noted the need to create trans-European networks (in the areas of transport, energy and telecommunications) in order to draw every possible benefit from completion of the single market. He also stressed the importance of developing satellite services, particularly to reach outlying regions. He considered in this respect that content had been dealt with satisfactorily. Finally, he was prepared to do everything in his power to ensure that the list of priorities could be updated in 2000.

Documents
Debate in Parliament
1997/04/24
   EP - Report tabled for plenary by Parliament delegation to Conciliation Committee, 3rd reading
Documents
A4-0166/1997
OJ C 167 02.06.1997, p. 0003
1997/04/24
   EP - Report tabled for plenary, 3rd reading
Documents
A4-0166/1997
1997/04/16
   CSL/EP - Joint text approved by Conciliation Committee co-chairs
Documents
3707/1997
1997/04/16
   EP/CSL - Joint text approved by Conciliation Committee co-chairs
Documents
3707/1997
1997/04/11
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
PE222.098
1997/03/07
   EP/CSL - Formal meeting of Conciliation Committee
1997/03/07
   EP/CSL - Final decision by Conciliation Committee
1996/09/24
   CSL - Parliament's amendments rejected by Council
Details

The Council declared that it was not in a position to take over all of Parliament’s amendments to the common position of 21 March 1996 relating to the decision in question. The Conciliation Committee would therefore be convened under the terms of the codecision procedure (Article 189b of the Treaty).

1996/09/24
   CSL - Council Meeting
1996/09/17
   EC - Commission opinion on Parliament's position at 2nd reading
Documents
EUR-Lex
COM(1996)0444
1996/07/17
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, 2nd reading
Documents
OJ C 261 09.09.1996, p. 0050-0059
T4-0396/1996
1996/07/17
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading
Documents
T4-0396/1996
1996/07/16
   EP - Debate in Parliament
Details

The rapporteur, Mr Hoppenstedt (EPP, D), supported the 27 amendments made to the common position of the Council, especially those dealing with the taking of decisions jointly by Parliament and the Council for the selection of projects relating to trans-European telecommunications networks. Commissioner Bangemann, for his part, announced that the Council would reject the amendments, with the result that Parliament would have to initiate the conciliation procedure.

Documents
Debate in Parliament
1996/06/26
   EP - Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
Documents
A4-0222/1996
OJ C 211 22.07.1996, p. 0003
1996/06/26
   EP - Vote in committee, 2nd reading
1996/06/26
   EP - Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading
Documents
A4-0222/1996
1996/06/14
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
PE217.505
1996/04/18
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading
1996/04/15
   EC - Commission communication on Council's position
Documents
EUR-Lex
SEC(1996)0636
1996/03/21
   CSL - Council position
Documents
04137/1/1996
OJ C 134 06.05.1996, p. 0018
1996/03/21
   CSL - Council position published
Documents
04137/1/1996
1996/03/21
   CSL - Council Meeting
1996/03/20
   EC - Modified legislative proposal
Documents
EUR-Lex
OJ C 175 18.06.1996, p. 0004
COM(1996)0108
1996/03/20
   EC - Modified legislative proposal published
Documents
EUR-Lex
COM(1996)0108
1996/02/01
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
OJ C 047 19.02.1996, p. 0011-0015
T4-0036/1996
1996/02/01
   EP - Debate in Parliament
Details

The rapporteur, Mr HOPPENSTEDT, noted that SMEs were not encouraged to acquire the necessary means to make use of trans-European telecommunications networks and believed that the global transnational development of these networks was being neglected. Even though it was not possible a priori to define specific projects, he was insistent that priorities should be set and adopted a strategic view of the objectives of trans-European telecommunications networks. He also called for the social repercussions to be taken into account and for assurances to be given on the compatibility of the applications at European level; he also wanted to see duplication avoided. Finally, in anticipation of the common position being adopted by the Telecommunications Council on 21 March, the rapporteur wanted to see a formal debate held, with Parliament included. Commissioner BANGEMANN stated that of the 53 amendments that had been tabled he was prepared to accept 13 as they were and 15 with some modification, while rejecting a further 25. As regards comitology, he added that the Commission wanted to respect the ‘modus vivendi’ that had already been approved on this issue. He also said that the Commission had set up an information office for interested parties. As far as funding was concerned, Mr Bangemann pointed out that this had been put at some ECU 250 billion; private finance would therefore have to be called in, since the public purse could not support such a cost; finally, he supported the idea of adopting a glossary of definitions.

Documents
Debate in Parliament
1996/02/01
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
T4-0036/1996
1996/01/17
   CofR - Committee of the Regions: opinion
Details

The Committee of the Regions: - in referring to the opinions already expressed, underlined the crucial significance of local actions associated with the information society, especially as regards the creation of new job and those efforts directed at reducing the disparities that tended to affect citizens following the introduction of new instruments. In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity the Community should therefore support local innovation and refrain from making generalised definitions as to the content of the applications, especially when it came to the planning and implementation of applications relating to the information society. - expressed its concerns about the fact that the partitioning effect of the financial instruments could in certain cases disunite the regions instead of promoting their mutual cohesion, which was the ultimate objective of the exercise. - took the view, in response to opinions expressed in the report on the role of the Community, that as far as cohesion at regional level was concerned there was a need for greater use to be made of EU expertise in the field of projects relating to the information society, especially if their theme or content had a trans-European character. - supported the objective of extending the activities of the ISPO (Information Society Project Office) to the Member States and to the regions. Indeed, their effectiveness as sources of information and as coordinators for the different parties made them particularly well suited to the role envisaged by the Commission within the Community. - believed that it was extremely important to have a presentation of the position of the applications within the trans-European telecommunications networks, given that the impact of their subject matter continued to increase. - The Committee was keen to learn from the important lessons drawn from local and regional networks, which combined citizens, SMEs and the public offices. As the links forged with the network, and especially with the bordering networks and local services, were often essential in the eyes of the consumer, the Committee hoped that quickening the pace at which solutions were developed – and the Interregional Information Society Initiative (IRISI) was a good example of this – would take precedence over the development of other types of application. The importance of having centres for developing and providing multimedia services on a regional scale needed to be taken into consideration. The success of regional projects would stimulate demand for increasing the development of other applications and of an infrastructure of the type described by the Commission. - From among the main fields of application the existence of the internet had to be taken into consideration for the development of a trans-European network serving the universities and research institutes, for as far as these establishments were concerned the objectives were practically achieved. - hoped that the call for proposals for applications of collective interest would define the services envisaged in such a way that prospective customers would understand the contents without ambiguity. - as far as basic networks were concerned the Committee drew special attention to the development of EURO-ISDN, the growth of the supply sector and the greater degree of stability, thanks to which the cost of terminal equipment using this technology would continue to fall and therefore would come within the range of a growing number of users. - stressed the importance of developing broadband wireless networks, especially in those regions where it was not practical to invest in hardwire systems for geographical reasons and so forth. - The Committee hoped that the reports would take account of regional development and of the differences that existed. It appeared to be more equitable to present the general situation of networks serving the information society and of trans-European networks on the basis of the less-favoured regions, rather than on those that were well developed.

Documents
CDR0020/1996
OJ C 129 02.05.1996, p. 0032
1995/12/21
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
PE213.979/DEF
1995/12/21
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
PE214.023/DEF
1995/12/21
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
PE214.178/DEF
1995/12/21
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
PE214.461/DEF
1995/12/19
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
OJ C 032 05.02.1996, p. 0005
A4-0336/1995
1995/12/19
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
1995/12/19
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
A4-0336/1995
1995/11/27
   CSL - Council Meeting
1995/11/23
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
PE214.573/B
1995/11/22
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
Details

The ESC basically endorsed the Commission proposal for a European Parliament and Council Decision. However, it put forward a number of comments. The ESC thought that the proposed projects should attach special importance to the social, cultural, educational and environmental issues. In these areas in particular a universal network serving as many of Europe’s citizens as possible was important. With special regard to the liberalisation of the telecommunications sector and the associated commercialisation of research and development programmes, the ESC felt that the projects should be continuously vetted by the Commission to see whether overall European-wide economic considerations were brought to bear within the framework of a modern, active and forward-looking industrial policy. The ESC thought that an annual report would be desirable. The trans-European networks marked a further step towards the social and economic modernisation of Europe. In this context, it would not be possible to find the requisite funds for investment unless: - European firms formed strong alliances that could operate on the world market as global players; - the principle of reciprocity was applied in world trade.

Documents
CES1297/1995
OJ C 039 12.02.1996, p. 0020
1995/10/30
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
PE214.573/A
1995/09/07
   EP - Former Committee Opinion
1995/07/19
   EP - Former Committee Opinion
1995/07/10
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
1995/05/31
   EC - Legislative proposal
Documents
EUR-Lex
OJ C 302 14.11.1995, p. 0023
COM(1995)0224
1995/05/31
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Documents
EUR-Lex
COM(1995)0224
1995/04/06
   EP - Former Responsible Committee
1995/04/06
   EP - Former Responsible Committee

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

2019-07-12Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1995:302:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1995:302:TOC
docs/11/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1996:175:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1996:175:TOC
docs/21/docs/0/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1997:167:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1997:167:TOC
events/23/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:1997:183:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:1997:183:TOC
2019-07-06Show (48) Changes | Timetravel
activities
  • date: 1995-05-31T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1995&nu_doc=224 title: COM(1995)0224 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:51995PC0224:EN body: EC commission: type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 1995-07-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 1995-04-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy rapporteur: group: PPE name: HOPPENSTEDT Karsten Friedrich body: EP responsible: False committee: ENER date: 1995-07-19T00:00:00 committee_full: ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: IZQUIERDO COLLADO Juan de Dios body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs, Citizens' Rights committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 1995-09-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Policy rapporteur: group: PSE name: HALLAM David John Alfred body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 1995-11-27T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Telecommunications meeting_id: 1888
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 1995-04-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy rapporteur: group: PPE name: HOPPENSTEDT Karsten Friedrich body: EP responsible: False committee: ENER date: 1995-07-19T00:00:00 committee_full: ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: IZQUIERDO COLLADO Juan de Dios body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs, Citizens' Rights committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 1995-09-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Policy rapporteur: group: PSE name: HALLAM David John Alfred body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN docs: type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A4-0336/1995 date: 1995-12-19T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 1996-02-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19960201&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T4-0036/1996 body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 1996-03-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1996&nu_doc=108 title: COM(1996)0108 type: Modified legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:51996PC0108:EN body: EC commission: type: Modified legislative proposal published
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 1910 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=4137%2F96&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Council position published title: 04137/1/1996 council: Telecommunications date: 1996-03-21T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 1996-04-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 1995-04-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy rapporteur: group: PPE name: HOPPENSTEDT Karsten Friedrich
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 1995-04-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy rapporteur: group: PPE name: HOPPENSTEDT Karsten Friedrich docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1996-222&language=EN type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading title: A4-0222/1996 date: 1996-06-26T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 2nd reading
  • date: 1996-07-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19960716&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 1996-07-17T00:00:00 docs: type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading title: T4-0396/1996 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 1948 council: Social Affairs date: 1996-09-24T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 1997-03-07T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Formal meeting of Conciliation Committee
  • date: 1997-04-16T00:00:00 docs: type: Joint text approved by Conciliation Committee co-chairs title: 3707/1997 body: EP/CSL type: Joint text approved by Conciliation Committee co-chairs
  • date: 1997-04-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1997-166&language=EN type: Report tabled for plenary, 3rd reading title: A4-0166/1997 body: EP type: Report tabled for plenary, 3rd reading
  • date: 1997-05-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19970513&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 1997-05-14T00:00:00 docs: type: Decision by Parliament, 3rd reading title: T4-0225/1997 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 3rd reading
  • date: 1997-05-26T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2008
  • date: 1997-06-17T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
  • date: 1997-06-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 1997-07-11T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=31997D1336 title: Decision 1997/1336 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:1997:183:TOC title: OJ L 183 11.07.1997, p. 0012
committees/0/associated
False
committees/0/date
Old
1995-04-06T00:00:00
New
  • 1995-04-06T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur/0
name
HOPPENSTEDT Karsten Friedrich
group
European People's Party (Christian Democrats)
abbr
PPE
committees/0/rapporteur/0
group
PPE
name
HOPPENSTEDT Karsten Friedrich
committees/0/responsible
True
committees/0/type
Former Responsible Committee
committees/1/associated
False
committees/1/committee
Old
ENER
New
ECON
committees/1/committee_full
Old
ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy
New
Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy
committees/1/date
Old
1995-07-19T00:00:00
New
  • 1995-04-06T00:00:00
committees/1/rapporteur/0
name
HOPPENSTEDT Karsten Friedrich
group
European People's Party (Christian Democrats)
abbr
PPE
committees/1/rapporteur/0
group
PSE
name
IZQUIERDO COLLADO Juan de Dios
committees/1/responsible
False
committees/1/type
Former Responsible Committee
committees/2/associated
False
committees/2/committee
Old
ENVI
New
ENER
committees/2/committee_full
Old
Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection
New
Research, Technological Development and Energy
committees/2/date
  • 1995-07-19T00:00:00
committees/2/rapporteur
  • name: IZQUIERDO COLLADO Juan de Dios group: Party of European Socialists abbr: PES
committees/2/responsible
False
committees/2/type
Former Committee Opinion
committees/3/associated
False
committees/3/opinion
False
committees/3/responsible
False
committees/3/type
Former Committee Opinion
committees/4/associated
False
committees/4/date
Old
1995-09-07T00:00:00
New
  • 1995-09-07T00:00:00
committees/4/rapporteur/0
name
HALLAM David John Alfred
group
Party of European Socialists
abbr
PES
committees/4/rapporteur/0
group
PSE
name
HALLAM David John Alfred
committees/4/responsible
False
committees/4/type
Former Committee Opinion
committees/5/associated
False
committees/5/date
    committees/5/responsible
    False
    committees/5/type
    Former Committee Opinion
    committees/6
    type
    Former Committee Opinion
    body
    EP
    associated
    False
    committee_full
    Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection
    committee
    ENVI
    opinion
    False
    council
    • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2008 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2008*&MEET_DATE=26/05/1997 date: 1997-05-26T00:00:00
    • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Social Affairs meeting_id: 1948 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=1948*&MEET_DATE=24/09/1996 date: 1996-09-24T00:00:00
    • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Telecommunications meeting_id: 1910 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=1910*&MEET_DATE=21/03/1996 date: 1996-03-21T00:00:00
    • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Telecommunications meeting_id: 1888 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=1888*&MEET_DATE=27/11/1995 date: 1995-11-27T00:00:00
    docs
    • date: 1995-05-31T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1995&nu_doc=224 title: EUR-Lex url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1995:302:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 302 14.11.1995, p. 0023 title: COM(1995)0224 summary: type: Legislative proposal body: EC
    • date: 1995-10-30T00:00:00 docs: title: PE214.573/A type: Committee draft report body: EP
    • date: 1995-11-22T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1297)(documentyear:1995)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES1297/1995 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1996:039:TOC title: OJ C 039 12.02.1996, p. 0020 summary: The ESC basically endorsed the Commission proposal for a European Parliament and Council Decision. However, it put forward a number of comments. The ESC thought that the proposed projects should attach special importance to the social, cultural, educational and environmental issues. In these areas in particular a universal network serving as many of Europe’s citizens as possible was important. With special regard to the liberalisation of the telecommunications sector and the associated commercialisation of research and development programmes, the ESC felt that the projects should be continuously vetted by the Commission to see whether overall European-wide economic considerations were brought to bear within the framework of a modern, active and forward-looking industrial policy. The ESC thought that an annual report would be desirable. The trans-European networks marked a further step towards the social and economic modernisation of Europe. In this context, it would not be possible to find the requisite funds for investment unless: - European firms formed strong alliances that could operate on the world market as global players; - the principle of reciprocity was applied in world trade. type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report body: ESC
    • date: 1995-11-23T00:00:00 docs: title: PE214.573/B type: Committee draft report body: EP
    • date: 1995-12-19T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1996:032:TOC title: OJ C 032 05.02.1996, p. 0005 title: A4-0336/1995 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
    • date: 1995-12-21T00:00:00 docs: title: PE213.979/DEF committee: CULT type: Committee opinion body: EP
    • date: 1995-12-21T00:00:00 docs: title: PE214.023/DEF committee: REGI type: Committee opinion body: EP
    • date: 1995-12-21T00:00:00 docs: title: PE214.178/DEF committee: TRAN type: Committee opinion body: EP
    • date: 1995-12-21T00:00:00 docs: title: PE214.461/DEF committee: ENER type: Committee opinion body: EP
    • date: 1996-01-17T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0020)(documentyear:1996)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CDR0020/1996 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1996:129:TOC title: OJ C 129 02.05.1996, p. 0032 summary: The Committee of the Regions: - in referring to the opinions already expressed, underlined the crucial significance of local actions associated with the information society, especially as regards the creation of new job and those efforts directed at reducing the disparities that tended to affect citizens following the introduction of new instruments. In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity the Community should therefore support local innovation and refrain from making generalised definitions as to the content of the applications, especially when it came to the planning and implementation of applications relating to the information society. - expressed its concerns about the fact that the partitioning effect of the financial instruments could in certain cases disunite the regions instead of promoting their mutual cohesion, which was the ultimate objective of the exercise. - took the view, in response to opinions expressed in the report on the role of the Community, that as far as cohesion at regional level was concerned there was a need for greater use to be made of EU expertise in the field of projects relating to the information society, especially if their theme or content had a trans-European character. - supported the objective of extending the activities of the ISPO (Information Society Project Office) to the Member States and to the regions. Indeed, their effectiveness as sources of information and as coordinators for the different parties made them particularly well suited to the role envisaged by the Commission within the Community. - believed that it was extremely important to have a presentation of the position of the applications within the trans-European telecommunications networks, given that the impact of their subject matter continued to increase. - The Committee was keen to learn from the important lessons drawn from local and regional networks, which combined citizens, SMEs and the public offices. As the links forged with the network, and especially with the bordering networks and local services, were often essential in the eyes of the consumer, the Committee hoped that quickening the pace at which solutions were developed – and the Interregional Information Society Initiative (IRISI) was a good example of this – would take precedence over the development of other types of application. The importance of having centres for developing and providing multimedia services on a regional scale needed to be taken into consideration. The success of regional projects would stimulate demand for increasing the development of other applications and of an infrastructure of the type described by the Commission. - From among the main fields of application the existence of the internet had to be taken into consideration for the development of a trans-European network serving the universities and research institutes, for as far as these establishments were concerned the objectives were practically achieved. - hoped that the call for proposals for applications of collective interest would define the services envisaged in such a way that prospective customers would understand the contents without ambiguity. - as far as basic networks were concerned the Committee drew special attention to the development of EURO-ISDN, the growth of the supply sector and the greater degree of stability, thanks to which the cost of terminal equipment using this technology would continue to fall and therefore would come within the range of a growing number of users. - stressed the importance of developing broadband wireless networks, especially in those regions where it was not practical to invest in hardwire systems for geographical reasons and so forth. - The Committee hoped that the reports would take account of regional development and of the differences that existed. It appeared to be more equitable to present the general situation of networks serving the information society and of trans-European networks on the basis of the less-favoured regions, rather than on those that were well developed. type: Committee of the Regions: opinion body: CofR
    • date: 1996-02-01T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1996:047:TOC title: OJ C 047 19.02.1996, p. 0011-0015 title: T4-0036/1996 summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
    • date: 1996-03-20T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1996&nu_doc=108 title: EUR-Lex url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1996:175:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 175 18.06.1996, p. 0004 title: COM(1996)0108 summary: type: Modified legislative proposal body: EC
    • date: 1996-03-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=4137%2F96&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 04137/1/1996 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1996:134:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 134 06.05.1996, p. 0018 summary: type: Council position body: CSL
    • date: 1996-04-15T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=1996&nu_doc=636 title: EUR-Lex title: SEC(1996)0636 summary: type: Commission communication on Council's position body: EC
    • date: 1996-06-14T00:00:00 docs: title: PE217.505 type: Committee draft report body: EP
    • date: 1996-06-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1996-222&language=EN title: A4-0222/1996 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1996:211:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 211 22.07.1996, p. 0003 type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading body: EP
    • date: 1996-07-17T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1996:261:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 261 09.09.1996, p. 0050-0059 title: T4-0396/1996 summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament, 2nd reading body: EP
    • date: 1996-09-17T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1996&nu_doc=444 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(1996)0444 summary: type: Commission opinion on Parliament's position at 2nd reading body: EC
    • date: 1997-04-11T00:00:00 docs: title: PE222.098 type: Committee draft report body: EP
    • date: 1997-04-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=3707%2F97&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 3707/1997 type: Joint text approved by Conciliation Committee co-chairs body: CSL/EP
    • date: 1997-04-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1997-166&language=EN title: A4-0166/1997 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1997:167:TOC title: OJ C 167 02.06.1997, p. 0003 type: Report tabled for plenary by Parliament delegation to Conciliation Committee, 3rd reading body: EP
    • date: 1997-05-14T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1997:167:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 167 02.06.1997, p. 0044-0055 title: T4-0225/1997 summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament, 3rd reading body: EP
    events
    • date: 1995-05-31T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1995&nu_doc=224 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(1995)0224 summary:
    • date: 1995-07-10T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
    • date: 1995-12-19T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary:
    • date: 1995-12-19T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: title: A4-0336/1995
    • date: 1996-02-01T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19960201&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament summary: The rapporteur, Mr HOPPENSTEDT, noted that SMEs were not encouraged to acquire the necessary means to make use of trans-European telecommunications networks and believed that the global transnational development of these networks was being neglected. Even though it was not possible a priori to define specific projects, he was insistent that priorities should be set and adopted a strategic view of the objectives of trans-European telecommunications networks. He also called for the social repercussions to be taken into account and for assurances to be given on the compatibility of the applications at European level; he also wanted to see duplication avoided. Finally, in anticipation of the common position being adopted by the Telecommunications Council on 21 March, the rapporteur wanted to see a formal debate held, with Parliament included. Commissioner BANGEMANN stated that of the 53 amendments that had been tabled he was prepared to accept 13 as they were and 15 with some modification, while rejecting a further 25. As regards comitology, he added that the Commission wanted to respect the ‘modus vivendi’ that had already been approved on this issue. He also said that the Commission had set up an information office for interested parties. As far as funding was concerned, Mr Bangemann pointed out that this had been put at some ECU 250 billion; private finance would therefore have to be called in, since the public purse could not support such a cost; finally, he supported the idea of adopting a glossary of definitions.
    • date: 1996-02-01T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: title: T4-0036/1996 summary:
    • date: 1996-03-20T00:00:00 type: Modified legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1996&nu_doc=108 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(1996)0108 summary:
    • date: 1996-03-21T00:00:00 type: Council position published body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=4137%2F96&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 04137/1/1996 summary:
    • date: 1996-04-18T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading body: EP
    • date: 1996-06-26T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 2nd reading body: EP summary:
    • date: 1996-06-26T00:00:00 type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1996-222&language=EN title: A4-0222/1996
    • date: 1996-07-16T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19960716&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament summary: The rapporteur, Mr Hoppenstedt (EPP, D), supported the 27 amendments made to the common position of the Council, especially those dealing with the taking of decisions jointly by Parliament and the Council for the selection of projects relating to trans-European telecommunications networks. Commissioner Bangemann, for his part, announced that the Council would reject the amendments, with the result that Parliament would have to initiate the conciliation procedure.
    • date: 1996-07-17T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading body: EP docs: title: T4-0396/1996 summary:
    • date: 1996-09-24T00:00:00 type: Parliament's amendments rejected by Council body: CSL summary: The Council declared that it was not in a position to take over all of Parliament’s amendments to the common position of 21 March 1996 relating to the decision in question. The Conciliation Committee would therefore be convened under the terms of the codecision procedure (Article 189b of the Treaty).
    • date: 1997-03-07T00:00:00 type: Formal meeting of Conciliation Committee body: EP/CSL summary:
    • date: 1997-03-07T00:00:00 type: Final decision by Conciliation Committee body: EP/CSL
    • date: 1997-04-16T00:00:00 type: Joint text approved by Conciliation Committee co-chairs body: EP/CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=3707%2F97&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 3707/1997
    • date: 1997-04-24T00:00:00 type: Report tabled for plenary, 3rd reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1997-166&language=EN title: A4-0166/1997
    • date: 1997-05-13T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19970513&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament summary: The rapporteur welcomed the successful conclusion of the conciliation procedure and commented that, even though the budget would not permit any major strides forward, it would contribute to the development of the information society. He was also delighted that the revision of the ‘lists of projects of common interest’ would occur before 31 December 2001. Within this revision, priority should still be given to generic services and to telematics for the environment and health. The rapporteur stressed once again that the problem of satellite services should be tackled better in the future. While qualifying the compromise reached between Parliament and Council as very good, Mr Bangemann noted the need to create trans-European networks (in the areas of transport, energy and telecommunications) in order to draw every possible benefit from completion of the single market. He also stressed the importance of developing satellite services, particularly to reach outlying regions. He considered in this respect that content had been dealt with satisfactorily. Finally, he was prepared to do everything in his power to ensure that the list of priorities could be updated in 2000.
    • date: 1997-05-14T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 3rd reading body: EP docs: title: T4-0225/1997 summary:
    • date: 1997-05-26T00:00:00 type: Decision by Council, 3rd reading body: CSL
    • date: 1997-06-17T00:00:00 type: Final act signed body: CSL
    • date: 1997-06-17T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
    • date: 1997-07-11T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: title: Decision 1997/1336 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=31997D1336 title: OJ L 183 11.07.1997, p. 0012 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:1997:183:SOM:EN:HTML
    other
    • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    CODE/4/08273
    New
    • CODE/4/08273
    procedure/final/url
    Old
    http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=31997D1336
    New
    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=31997D1336
    procedure/instrument
    Old
    Decision
    New
    • Decision
    • Repealed by 2011/0299(COD)
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    EC before Amsterdam E 129D-p1
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    EC before Amsterdam E 129-p1
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 3.30.20 Trans-European communications networks
    New
    3.30.20
    Trans-European communications networks
    procedure/summary
    • Repealed by
    2015-11-04Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
    links/European Commission/title
    Old
    PreLex
    New
    EUR-Lex
    2014-11-10Show (5) Changes
    activities
    • date: 1995-05-31T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1995&nu_doc=224 celexid: CELEX:51995PC0224:EN type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(1995)0224 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC commission:
    • date: 1995-07-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 1995-04-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy rapporteur: group: PPE name: HOPPENSTEDT Karsten Friedrich body: EP responsible: False committee: ENER date: 1995-07-19T00:00:00 committee_full: ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: IZQUIERDO COLLADO Juan de Dios body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs, Citizens' Rights committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 1995-09-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Policy rapporteur: group: PSE name: HALLAM David John Alfred body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
    • date: 1995-11-27T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Telecommunications meeting_id: 1888
    • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 1995-04-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy rapporteur: group: PPE name: HOPPENSTEDT Karsten Friedrich body: EP responsible: False committee: ENER date: 1995-07-19T00:00:00 committee_full: ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: IZQUIERDO COLLADO Juan de Dios body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs, Citizens' Rights committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 1995-09-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Policy rapporteur: group: PSE name: HALLAM David John Alfred body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN docs: type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A4-0336/1995 date: 1995-12-19T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    • date: 1996-02-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19960201&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T4-0036/1996 body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 1996-03-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1996&nu_doc=108 celexid: CELEX:51996PC0108:EN type: Modified legislative proposal published title: COM(1996)0108 type: Modified legislative proposal published body: EC commission:
    • body: CSL meeting_id: 1910 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=4137%2F96&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Council position published title: 04137/1/1996 council: Telecommunications date: 1996-03-21T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
    • date: 1996-04-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 2nd reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 1995-04-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy rapporteur: group: PPE name: HOPPENSTEDT Karsten Friedrich
    • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 1995-04-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy rapporteur: group: PPE name: HOPPENSTEDT Karsten Friedrich docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1996-222&language=EN type: Committee recommendation tabled for plenary, 2nd reading title: A4-0222/1996 date: 1996-06-26T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 2nd reading
    • date: 1996-07-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19960716&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 1996-07-17T00:00:00 docs: type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading title: T4-0396/1996 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 2nd reading
    • body: CSL meeting_id: 1948 council: Social Affairs date: 1996-09-24T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
    • date: 1997-03-07T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Formal meeting of Conciliation Committee
    • date: 1997-04-16T00:00:00 docs: type: Joint text approved by Conciliation Committee co-chairs title: 3707/1997 body: EP/CSL type: Joint text approved by Conciliation Committee co-chairs
    • date: 1997-04-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1997-166&language=EN type: Report tabled for plenary, 3rd reading title: A4-0166/1997 body: EP type: Report tabled for plenary, 3rd reading
    • date: 1997-05-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19970513&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 1997-05-14T00:00:00 docs: type: Decision by Parliament, 3rd reading title: T4-0225/1997 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 3rd reading
    • date: 1997-05-26T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) meeting_id: 2008
    • date: 1997-06-17T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed
    • date: 1997-06-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
    • date: 1997-07-11T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=31997D1336 title: Decision 1997/1336 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:1997:183:TOC title: OJ L 183 11.07.1997, p. 0012
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: True committee: ECON date: 1995-04-06T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs, Industrial Policy rapporteur: group: PPE name: HOPPENSTEDT Karsten Friedrich
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: ENER date: 1995-07-19T00:00:00 committee_full: ENER Research, Technological Development and Energy rapporteur: group: PSE name: IZQUIERDO COLLADO Juan de Dios
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection committee: ENVI
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs, Citizens' Rights committee: JURI
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 1995-09-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Policy rapporteur: group: PSE name: HALLAM David John Alfred
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
    links
    European Commission
    other
    • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
    procedure
    dossier_of_the_committee
    CODE/4/08273
    reference
    1995/0124(COD)
    instrument
    Decision
    legal_basis
    EC before Amsterdam E 129-p1
    stage_reached
    Procedure completed
    summary
    Repealed by
    subtype
    Legislation
    title
    Series of guidelines for trans-European telecommunications networks
    type
    COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure)
    final
    subject
    3.30.20 Trans-European communications networks
    @parltrack
    @parltrack@eupolicy.social
    [javascript protected email address]
    code AGPLv3.0+
    data ODBLv1.0
    site content CC-By-Sa-3.0

    ParlTrack - 2011-2024

    © European Union, 2011 – Source: European Parliament
    Hosted by AS250.net Foundation