\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \t\t\tOBJECTIVE: presentation of a report concerning the activities of the EAGGF Guarantee Section\nfor 1996\nSUBSTANCE: According to the report the total appropriations allocated to the EAGGF Guarantee\nSection in 1996 came to ECU 40 828 million as opposed to ECU 38 million in 1995. Total\nexpenditure came to ECU 39 107.8 million which was also higher than the 1995 figures (ECU 34 500\nm). The reasons given by the Commission for this rise are as follows: \n- the fact that the aid introduced under the reform of the CAP was paid in full to the Member States\nfor the first time in 1996,\n- the European Union's Member States went from 12 to 15,\n- the BSE crisis resulting in many measures to stabilize the market in beef and veal (storage, slaughter\nand income support for producers).\nHowever, the Commission indicates that despite this rise in spending the share of EAGGF Guarantee\nSection expenditure in the general budget of the Union fell (from 51.7% to 50.5%). \nConcerning the breakdown of expenditure by economic type, the following trends are apparent:\n1) expenditure on export refunds continued to decline, falling from ECU 7802 million in 1995 to\nECU 5705 million in 1996 (14.6% of total EAGGF expenditure);\n2) intervention spending came to ECU 31 955 million including storage aid (which rose very sharply\nfrom 1995 because of storage of beef) and price compensatory aid was also up as a result of\nexceptional income support measures for beef and cattle producers.\nThe Commission also points out that since the reform of the CAP direct aid received by farmers on\nall products amounts to ECU 28 853 million, which is close on 70% of total EAGGF Guarantee\nSection funds. It also gave a sector by sector breakdown (40.7% for arable crops, 16.6% for beef and\nveal, 8.9% for milk products). Concerning the breakdown of expenditure by Member States France\nis still the main recipient of EAGGF Guarantee Section expenditure receiving 24% of overall\nspending. It is trailed by Germany, Italy and Spain.\nConcerning cash flow and the management of aid, in addition to details regarding measures taken by\nthe Commission to reduce or suspend monthly advances to the Member States where declarations\nof expenditure were inadequate (for example the free distribution of fruit and vegetables to deprived\npersons in Greece), the Commission indicates that a new fraud prevention plan has been drawn up\nby the UCLAF, an Integrated System of inspection consisting of 5 components: database,\nidentification of parcels of agricultural land, livestock identification and regulation, aid applications\nand systems of control. These were mostly in place at the end of 1996. Olive oil inspection agencies\nalso continued their work stepping up checks. Finally, a remote sensing system (allowing checks to\nbe carried out on declarations of area), the cost of which is shared equally by the Commission and\nby the Member States has been finalized and is currently comparable with that of 'conventional'\nchecks.�
\n\t\t \t\t\t\t\t\t
\n"],"title":"COM(1997)0589","type":"Non-legislative basic document published","url":"http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1997&nu_doc=589"}],"type":"Non-legislative basic document published"},{"body":"EP","committees":[{"body":"EP","committee":"AGRI","committee_full":"Agriculture and Rural Development","date":"1998-02-03T00:00:00","rapporteur":[{"group":"PSE","mepref":"51ec6508b819f2575200054c","name":"REHDER Klaus"}],"responsible":true},{"body":"EP","committee":"CONT","committee_full":"Budgetary Control","responsible":false}],"date":"1998-02-20T00:00:00","type":"Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading"},{"body":"EP","committees":[{"body":"EP","committee":"AGRI","committee_full":"Agriculture and Rural Development","date":"1998-02-03T00:00:00","rapporteur":[{"group":"PSE","mepref":"51ec6508b819f2575200054c","name":"REHDER Klaus"}],"responsible":true},{"body":"EP","committee":"CONT","committee_full":"Budgetary Control","responsible":false}],"date":"1998-09-02T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"A4-0298/1998","type":"Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading","url":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1998-298&language=EN"}],"text":["
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \t\t\tThe rapporteur on the 26th financial report concerning the European Agriculture Guidance and\nGuarantee Fund (EAGGF) - Guarantee Section (1996 financial year), Mr Klaus REHDER,\ndenounces the fact that the bewildering array of application procedures for agricultural aid is an\nopen invitation to abuse and calls for a simplification of the rules as part of the ?Agenda 2000?\nreforms.\nThe rapporteur also stressed that the frequency and thoroughness of checks differ substantially\nfrom Member State to Member State.\nHe deplored the fact that breaches of Community law are not always properly punished. Taking\nthe view that abuse results from deliberate misuse of EAGGF funding, a lack of control by\nMember States and inadequate control systems in the Member States, the rapporteur calls for\nconsiderable improvements in the Community?s own instruments of control and procedures for\nrecovery of undue payments.\nThe rapporteur also referred to criticisms of the imbalance in the present system of Community\naid from a social point of view: 80?% of funds only benefit 20?% of farmers (among the better\noff) and called for the promotion of CAP reforms which helped to support employment in the\nEuropean Union.�
\n\t\t \t\t\t\t\t\t
\n"],"type":"Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading"},{"body":"EP","date":"1998-10-22T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"Debate in Parliament","type":"Debate in Parliament","url":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19981022&type=CRE"}],"type":"Debate in Parliament"},{"body":"EP","date":"1998-10-23T00:00:00","docs":[{"text":["
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \t\t\tAdopting the report by Mr Klaus Rehder (PES, D) on the 26th financial report concerning the\nEAGGF Guarantee Section, Parliament denounces the fact that the bewildering array of application\nprocedures for agricultural aid is an open invitation to abuse and calls for a simplification of the rules\nas part of the Agenda 2000 reforms. Stressing the complexity of the procedures, Parliament points\nout that problems also result from the fact that the frequency and thoroughness of checks differ\nsubstantially from Member State to Member State and that breaches of EU law are not always\nproperly punished. It takes the view that abuses result from deliberate misuse of EAGGF funding,\na lack of control by Member States and inadequate control systems in the Member States. Parliament\ncalls for improvements in instruments of control and procedures for recovery of undue payments. It\nconsiders that the weakness of control instruments and recovery procedures lead the public to doubt\nwhether budgetary management in the EAGGF sector is genuinely coherent and transparent. \n�
\n\t\t \t\t\t\t\t\t
\n"],"title":"T4-0631/1998","type":"Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading"}],"type":"Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading"},{"date":"1998-11-09T00:00:00","type":"Final act published in Official Journal"}],"path":["activities"],"type":"added"},{"data":[],"path":["other"],"type":"added"},{"data":[{"body":"EP","committee":"AGRI","committee_full":"Agriculture and Rural Development","date":"1998-02-03T00:00:00","rapporteur":[{"group":"PSE","mepref":"51ec6508b819f2575200054c","name":"REHDER Klaus"}],"responsible":true},{"body":"EP","committee":"CONT","committee_full":"Budgetary Control","responsible":false}],"path":["committees"],"type":"added"},{"data":{},"path":["links"],"type":"added"},{"data":{"dossier_of_the_committee":"AGRI/4/09553","legal_basis":["Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 132"],"reference":"1997/2290(COS)","stage_reached":"Procedure completed","subject":["3.10.13 European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, EAGGF and EAGF"],"subtype":"Commission strategy paper","title":"EAGGF-Guarantee Section. 26th Financial Report 1996","type":"COS - Procedure on a strategy paper (historic)"},"path":["procedure"],"type":"added"}],"2019-07-06T14:29:35":[{"data":["AGRI/4/09553",["AGRI/4/09553"]],"path":["procedure","dossier_of_the_committee"],"type":"changed"},{"data":[["3.10.13 European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, EAGGF and EAGF"],{"3.10.13":"European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, EAGGF and EAGF"}],"path":["procedure","subject"],"type":"changed"},{"data":"Rules of Procedure EP 132","path":["procedure","legal_basis",0],"type":"added"},{"data":"Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 132","path":["procedure","legal_basis",0],"type":"deleted"},{"data":[{"body":"EP","date":"1998-05-12T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"PE225.379"}],"type":"Committee draft report"},{"body":"EP","committee":"CONT","date":"1998-06-03T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"PE226.082/DEF"}],"type":"Committee opinion"},{"body":"EP","date":"1998-07-23T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"PE225.379/AM"}],"type":"Amendments tabled in committee"},{"body":"EP","date":"1998-09-02T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"A4-0298/1998","url":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1998-298&language=EN"},{"title":"OJ C 313 12.10.1998, p. 0008","url":"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1998:313:TOC"}],"type":"Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading"},{"body":"EP","date":"1998-10-23T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"OJ C 341 09.11.1998, p. 0362-0371","url":"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1998:341:TOC"},{"title":"T4-0631/1998"}],"summary":[],"type":"Text adopted by Parliament, single reading"}],"path":["docs"],"type":"added"},{"data":[],"path":["other"],"type":"deleted"},{"data":[{"body":"EC","date":"1997-11-25T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"EUR-Lex","url":"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1997&nu_doc=589"},{"title":"COM(1997)0589"}],"summary":[],"type":"Non-legislative basic document published"},{"body":"EP","date":"1998-02-20T00:00:00","type":"Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading"},{"body":"EP","date":"1998-09-02T00:00:00","summary":[],"type":"Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading"},{"body":"EP","date":"1998-09-02T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"A4-0298/1998","url":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1998-298&language=EN"}],"type":"Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading"},{"body":"EP","date":"1998-10-22T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"Debate in Parliament","url":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19981022&type=CRE"}],"type":"Debate in Parliament"},{"body":"EP","date":"1998-10-23T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"T4-0631/1998"}],"summary":[],"type":"Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading"},{"body":"EP","date":"1998-10-23T00:00:00","type":"End of procedure in Parliament"},{"date":"1998-11-09T00:00:00","type":"Final act published in Official Journal"}],"path":["events"],"type":"added"},{"data":{},"path":["links"],"type":"deleted"},{"data":[{"body":"EC","commission":[],"date":"1997-11-25T00:00:00","docs":[{"celexid":"CELEX:51997DC0589:EN","text":["
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \t\t\tOBJECTIVE: presentation of a report concerning the activities of the EAGGF Guarantee Section\nfor 1996\nSUBSTANCE: According to the report the total appropriations allocated to the EAGGF Guarantee\nSection in 1996 came to ECU 40 828 million as opposed to ECU 38 million in 1995. Total\nexpenditure came to ECU 39 107.8 million which was also higher than the 1995 figures (ECU 34 500\nm). The reasons given by the Commission for this rise are as follows: \n- the fact that the aid introduced under the reform of the CAP was paid in full to the Member States\nfor the first time in 1996,\n- the European Union's Member States went from 12 to 15,\n- the BSE crisis resulting in many measures to stabilize the market in beef and veal (storage, slaughter\nand income support for producers).\nHowever, the Commission indicates that despite this rise in spending the share of EAGGF Guarantee\nSection expenditure in the general budget of the Union fell (from 51.7% to 50.5%). \nConcerning the breakdown of expenditure by economic type, the following trends are apparent:\n1) expenditure on export refunds continued to decline, falling from ECU 7802 million in 1995 to\nECU 5705 million in 1996 (14.6% of total EAGGF expenditure);\n2) intervention spending came to ECU 31 955 million including storage aid (which rose very sharply\nfrom 1995 because of storage of beef) and price compensatory aid was also up as a result of\nexceptional income support measures for beef and cattle producers.\nThe Commission also points out that since the reform of the CAP direct aid received by farmers on\nall products amounts to ECU 28 853 million, which is close on 70% of total EAGGF Guarantee\nSection funds. It also gave a sector by sector breakdown (40.7% for arable crops, 16.6% for beef and\nveal, 8.9% for milk products). Concerning the breakdown of expenditure by Member States France\nis still the main recipient of EAGGF Guarantee Section expenditure receiving 24% of overall\nspending. It is trailed by Germany, Italy and Spain.\nConcerning cash flow and the management of aid, in addition to details regarding measures taken by\nthe Commission to reduce or suspend monthly advances to the Member States where declarations\nof expenditure were inadequate (for example the free distribution of fruit and vegetables to deprived\npersons in Greece), the Commission indicates that a new fraud prevention plan has been drawn up\nby the UCLAF, an Integrated System of inspection consisting of 5 components: database,\nidentification of parcels of agricultural land, livestock identification and regulation, aid applications\nand systems of control. These were mostly in place at the end of 1996. Olive oil inspection agencies\nalso continued their work stepping up checks. Finally, a remote sensing system (allowing checks to\nbe carried out on declarations of area), the cost of which is shared equally by the Commission and\nby the Member States has been finalized and is currently comparable with that of 'conventional'\nchecks.�
\n\t\t \t\t\t\t\t\t
\n"],"title":"COM(1997)0589","type":"Non-legislative basic document published","url":"http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1997&nu_doc=589"}],"type":"Non-legislative basic document published"},{"body":"EP","committees":[{"body":"EP","committee":"AGRI","committee_full":"Agriculture and Rural Development","date":"1998-02-03T00:00:00","rapporteur":[{"group":"PSE","mepref":"51ec6508b819f2575200054c","name":"REHDER Klaus"}],"responsible":true},{"body":"EP","committee":"CONT","committee_full":"Budgetary Control","responsible":false}],"date":"1998-02-20T00:00:00","type":"Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading"},{"body":"EP","committees":[{"body":"EP","committee":"AGRI","committee_full":"Agriculture and Rural Development","date":"1998-02-03T00:00:00","rapporteur":[{"group":"PSE","mepref":"51ec6508b819f2575200054c","name":"REHDER Klaus"}],"responsible":true},{"body":"EP","committee":"CONT","committee_full":"Budgetary Control","responsible":false}],"date":"1998-09-02T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"A4-0298/1998","type":"Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading","url":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1998-298&language=EN"}],"text":["
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \t\t\tThe rapporteur on the 26th financial report concerning the European Agriculture Guidance and\nGuarantee Fund (EAGGF) - Guarantee Section (1996 financial year), Mr Klaus REHDER,\ndenounces the fact that the bewildering array of application procedures for agricultural aid is an\nopen invitation to abuse and calls for a simplification of the rules as part of the ?Agenda 2000?\nreforms.\nThe rapporteur also stressed that the frequency and thoroughness of checks differ substantially\nfrom Member State to Member State.\nHe deplored the fact that breaches of Community law are not always properly punished. Taking\nthe view that abuse results from deliberate misuse of EAGGF funding, a lack of control by\nMember States and inadequate control systems in the Member States, the rapporteur calls for\nconsiderable improvements in the Community?s own instruments of control and procedures for\nrecovery of undue payments.\nThe rapporteur also referred to criticisms of the imbalance in the present system of Community\naid from a social point of view: 80?% of funds only benefit 20?% of farmers (among the better\noff) and called for the promotion of CAP reforms which helped to support employment in the\nEuropean Union.�
\n\t\t \t\t\t\t\t\t
\n"],"type":"Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading"},{"body":"EP","date":"1998-10-22T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"Debate in Parliament","type":"Debate in Parliament","url":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19981022&type=CRE"}],"type":"Debate in Parliament"},{"body":"EP","date":"1998-10-23T00:00:00","docs":[{"text":["
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \t\t\tAdopting the report by Mr Klaus Rehder (PES, D) on the 26th financial report concerning the\nEAGGF Guarantee Section, Parliament denounces the fact that the bewildering array of application\nprocedures for agricultural aid is an open invitation to abuse and calls for a simplification of the rules\nas part of the Agenda 2000 reforms. Stressing the complexity of the procedures, Parliament points\nout that problems also result from the fact that the frequency and thoroughness of checks differ\nsubstantially from Member State to Member State and that breaches of EU law are not always\nproperly punished. It takes the view that abuses result from deliberate misuse of EAGGF funding,\na lack of control by Member States and inadequate control systems in the Member States. Parliament\ncalls for improvements in instruments of control and procedures for recovery of undue payments. It\nconsiders that the weakness of control instruments and recovery procedures lead the public to doubt\nwhether budgetary management in the EAGGF sector is genuinely coherent and transparent. \n�
\n\t\t \t\t\t\t\t\t
\n"],"title":"T4-0631/1998","type":"Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading"}],"type":"Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading"},{"date":"1998-11-09T00:00:00","type":"Final act published in Official Journal"}],"path":["activities"],"type":"deleted"},{"data":{"associated":false,"body":"EP","committee":"AGRI","committee_full":"Agriculture and Rural Development","date":["1998-02-03T00:00:00"],"rapporteur":[{"abbr":"PES","group":"Party of European Socialists","mepref":2233,"name":"REHDER Klaus"}],"type":"Responsible Committee"},"path":["committees",0],"type":"added"},{"data":{"associated":false,"body":"EP","committee":"CONT","committee_full":"Budgetary Control","date":[],"type":"Committee Opinion"},"path":["committees",1],"type":"added"},{"data":{"body":"EP","committee":"AGRI","committee_full":"Agriculture and Rural Development","date":"1998-02-03T00:00:00","rapporteur":[{"group":"PSE","mepref":"51ec6508b819f2575200054c","name":"REHDER Klaus"}],"responsible":true},"path":["committees",0],"type":"deleted"},{"data":{"body":"EP","committee":"CONT","committee_full":"Budgetary Control","responsible":false},"path":["committees",1],"type":"deleted"}],"2020-01-19T23:32:39":[{"data":{"body":"EP","date":"1998-09-02T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"A4-0298/1998","url":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1998-0298_EN.html"},{"title":"OJ C 313 12.10.1998, p. 0008","url":"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1998:313:SOM:EN:HTML"}],"type":"Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading"},"path":["docs",3],"type":"added"},{"data":{"body":"EP","date":"1998-09-02T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"A4-0298/1998","url":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1998-298&language=EN"},{"title":"OJ C 313 12.10.1998, p. 0008","url":"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1998:313:TOC"}],"type":"Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading"},"path":["docs",3],"type":"deleted"},{"data":["http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A4-1998-298&language=EN","http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1998-0298_EN.html"],"path":["events",3,"docs",0,"url"],"type":"changed"},{"data":[],"path":["committees",1,"date"],"type":"deleted"},{"data":{"associated":false,"body":"EP","committee":"AGRI","committee_full":"Agriculture and Rural Development","rapporteur":[{"abbr":"PES","date":"1998-02-03T00:00:00","group":"Party of European Socialists","mepref":2233,"name":"REHDER Klaus"}],"type":"Responsible Committee"},"path":["committees",0],"type":"added"},{"data":{"associated":false,"body":"EP","committee":"AGRI","committee_full":"Agriculture and Rural Development","date":["1998-02-03T00:00:00"],"rapporteur":[{"abbr":"PES","group":"Party of European Socialists","mepref":2233,"name":"REHDER Klaus"}],"type":"Responsible Committee"},"path":["committees",0],"type":"deleted"}],"2021-12-18T17:50:48":[{"data":["Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading","Committee referral announced in Parliament"],"path":["events",1,"type"],"type":"changed"},{"data":["Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading","Vote in committee"],"path":["events",2,"type"],"type":"changed"},{"data":["http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=19981022&type=CRE","https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=19981022&type=CRE"],"path":["events",4,"docs",0,"url"],"type":"changed"},{"data":["Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading","Decision by Parliament"],"path":["events",5,"type"],"type":"changed"},{"data":{"body":"EP","date":"1998-09-02T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"A4-0298/1998","url":"https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1998-0298_EN.html"}],"type":"Committee report tabled for plenary"},"path":["events",3],"type":"added"},{"data":{"body":"EP","date":"1998-09-02T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"A4-0298/1998","url":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1998-0298_EN.html"}],"type":"Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading"},"path":["events",3],"type":"deleted"},{"data":{"body":"EP","date":"1998-09-02T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"A4-0298/1998","url":"https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1998-0298_EN.html"},{"title":"OJ C 313 12.10.1998, p. 0008","url":"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1998:313:TOC"}],"type":"Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading"},"path":["docs",3],"type":"added"},{"data":{"body":"EP","date":"1998-09-02T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"A4-0298/1998","url":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1998-0298_EN.html"},{"title":"OJ C 313 12.10.1998, p. 0008","url":"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1998:313:SOM:EN:HTML"}],"type":"Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading"},"path":["docs",3],"type":"deleted"},{"data":"Rules of Procedure EP 142","path":["procedure","legal_basis",0],"type":"added"},{"data":"Rules of Procedure EP 132","path":["procedure","legal_basis",0],"type":"deleted"}],"2023-08-03T14:07:45":[{"data":["1997-11-25T00:00:00","1997-11-24T00:00:00"],"path":["events",0,"date"],"type":"changed"},{"data":["1998-09-02T00:00:00","1998-09-01T00:00:00"],"path":["events",3,"date"],"type":"changed"},{"data":{"body":"EP","date":"1998-10-23T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"OJ C 341 09.11.1998, p. 0362-0371","url":"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1998:341:TOC"},{"title":"T4-0631/1998"}],"summary":[],"type":"Text adopted by Parliament, single reading"},"path":["docs",4],"type":"deleted"},{"data":{"body":"EP","date":"1998-10-23T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"OJ C 341 09.11.1998, p. 0362-0371","url":"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1998:341:TOC"},{"title":"T4-0631/1998"}],"summary":[],"type":"Text adopted by Parliament, single reading"},"path":["docs",2],"type":"added"},{"data":["https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1998:341:TOC","https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1998:341:SOM:EN:HTML"],"path":["docs",2,"docs",0,"url"],"type":"changed"},{"data":{"body":"EC","date":"1997-11-25T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"EUR-Lex","url":"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1997&nu_doc=589"},{"title":"COM(1997)0589"}],"summary":[],"type":"Non-legislative basic document"},"path":["docs",0],"type":"added"},{"data":{"body":"EP","date":"1998-05-12T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"PE225.379"}],"type":"Committee draft report"},"path":["docs",0],"type":"deleted"},{"data":{"body":"EP","committee":"CONT","date":"1998-06-03T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"PE226.082/DEF"}],"type":"Committee opinion"},"path":["docs",1],"type":"deleted"},{"data":{"body":"EP","date":"1998-07-23T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"PE225.379/AM"}],"type":"Amendments tabled in committee"},"path":["docs",2],"type":"deleted"}]},"committees":[{"associated":false,"body":"EP","committee":"AGRI","committee_full":"Agriculture and Rural Development","rapporteur":[{"abbr":"PES","date":"1998-02-03T00:00:00","group":"Party of European Socialists","mepref":2233,"name":"REHDER Klaus"}],"type":"Responsible Committee"},{"associated":false,"body":"EP","committee":"CONT","committee_full":"Budgetary Control","type":"Committee Opinion"}],"docs":[{"body":"EC","date":"1997-11-25T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"EUR-Lex","url":"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1997&nu_doc=589"},{"title":"COM(1997)0589"}],"summary":[],"type":"Non-legislative basic document"},{"body":"EP","date":"1998-09-02T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"A4-0298/1998","url":"https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1998-0298_EN.html"},{"title":"OJ C 313 12.10.1998, p. 0008","url":"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1998:313:TOC"}],"type":"Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading"},{"body":"EP","date":"1998-10-23T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"OJ C 341 09.11.1998, p. 0362-0371","url":"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1998:341:SOM:EN:HTML"},{"title":"T4-0631/1998"}],"summary":[],"type":"Text adopted by Parliament, single reading"}],"events":[{"date":"1998-11-09T00:00:00","type":"Final act published in Official Journal"},{"body":"EP","date":"1998-10-23T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"OJ C 341 09.11.1998, p. 0362-0371","url":"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:1998:341:SOM:EN:HTML"},{"title":"T4-0631/1998"}],"summary":[],"type":"Text adopted by Parliament, single reading"},{"body":"EP","date":"1998-10-23T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"T4-0631/1998"}],"summary":[],"type":"Decision by Parliament"},{"body":"EP","date":"1998-10-23T00:00:00","type":"End of procedure in Parliament"},{"body":"EP","date":"1998-10-22T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"Debate in Parliament","url":"https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=19981022&type=CRE"}],"type":"Debate in Parliament"},{"body":"EP","date":"1998-09-02T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"A4-0298/1998","url":"https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1998-0298_EN.html"},{"title":"OJ C 313 12.10.1998, p. 0008","url":"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:1998:313:TOC"}],"type":"Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading"},{"body":"EP","date":"1998-09-02T00:00:00","summary":[],"type":"Vote in committee"},{"body":"EP","date":"1998-09-01T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"A4-0298/1998","url":"https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-4-1998-0298_EN.html"}],"type":"Committee report tabled for plenary"},{"body":"EP","date":"1998-02-20T00:00:00","type":"Committee referral announced in Parliament"},{"body":"EP","date":"1998-02-03T00:00:00","type":"REHDER Klaus (PES) appointed as rapporteur in AGRI"},{"body":"EC","date":"1997-11-25T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"EUR-Lex","url":"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1997&nu_doc=589"},{"title":"COM(1997)0589"}],"summary":[],"type":"Non-legislative basic document"},{"body":"EC","date":"1997-11-24T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"EUR-Lex","url":"https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=1997&nu_doc=589"},{"title":"COM(1997)0589"}],"summary":[],"type":"Non-legislative basic document published"}],"mep_activities":[],"meta":{"source":"https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/ficheprocedure.do?reference=1997/2290(COS)&l=en","updated":"2023-08-03T14:07:45"},"procedure":{"dossier_of_the_committee":["AGRI/4/09553"],"legal_basis":["RoP 142"],"reference":"1997/2290(COS)","stage_reached":"Procedure completed","subject":{"3.10.13":"European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, EAGGF and EAGF"},"subtype":"Commission strategy paper","title":"EAGGF-Guarantee Section. 26th Financial Report 1996","type":"COS - Procedure on a strategy paper (historic)"},"vmatrix":[]},"msg":null}