BETA


2002/0220(CNS) Energy: natural gas, security of supply

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ITRE MOMBAUR Peter Michael (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Former Responsible Committee ITRE MOMBAUR Peter Michael (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion JURI WALLIS Diana (icon: ELDR ELDR)
Former Committee Opinion ECON BLOKLAND Johannes (icon: EDD EDD)
Former Committee Opinion JURI
Former Committee Opinion ENVI KRONBERGER Hans (icon: NA NA)
Legal Basis:
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 095

Events

2009/07/16
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
Details

In order to strengthen the security of gas supply in the internal market, Council Directive 2004/67/EC concerning measures to safeguard security of natural gas supplies was adopted (see COD/2009/0108 ). The Directive provides that the Commission shall present an evaluation report on the implementation of the Directive by Member States, which is the purpose of this Commission Staff Working Document.

Transposition : most of the Member States have transposed the security of gas supply provisions of the Directive as part of their internal gas market legislation.

Differences in the security of gas supply roles of market players : Member States have defined the roles for their market players in a different way, which has created distortion for security of gas supply in European internal gas markets.

Security of supply standards : Member States have set very heterogeneous security of supply standards and in some Member States the definition of standards has not been made. These differences may create a barrier to the solidarity mechanism and to the finalisation of the internal gas market.

Security of gas supply instruments : the balance of various instruments is essential to enhancing the security of gas supply. The most frequent measures are gas storage, long term contracts, flexibility of production and imports and diversifications of gas supply. The general conclusion is that the level playing field within the EU has not been reached in terms of security of gas supply instruments.

National emergency measures : the two-step approach used by Member States has created a delay in full transposition of this provision and means that the Commission could only assess national emergency measures of 18 Member States. In any event, most of the Member States have defined their national emergency measures in a systematic way creating the national emergency plans. In these plans they also included prevention mechanisms, nominal level of gas market operation and different pre-emergency and emergency levels defined by disruption volume and by the economic impact.

Monitoring and reporting : Member States’ reporting obligations are set out in two gas Directives. Member States have not prepared their annual internal market report in a proper way and much of the mandated information is not included in those reports. Therefore, the Commission had to prepare additional questionnaires and data tables to fulfil its monitoring obligation, which created an additional administrative burden. Moreover, the obligation concerning what to monitor is not sufficient to assess either the current long-term and short-term, or any future security of supply situation of the EU and the effectiveness of the mitigation tools. In addition, reporting obligations are limited in frequency and scope and only three Member States provided complete reporting. Greater transparency is therefore needed.

2008/11/13
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

The Commission presents a Communication on the Directive 2004/67/EC of 26 April 2004 concerning measures to safeguard security of natural gas supply.

Security of supply, as one of the three pillars of the energy policy for Europe defined by the European Council in March 2007, is more and more seen as a public good deserving a closer attention from the European Union. Natural gas is currently the second most important fuel in the EU's energy mix, representing roughly a quarter of EU gross inland consumption. It is widely used in various sectors, such as power generation, district heating, households and industry.

The Commission considers that the EU needs to take a step forward on security of gas supply and solidarity. While crises may be rare, they can have very high economic and social impacts. Therefore the EU needs to be prepared to tackle security of supply in an effective way. Today's Community mechanism – although fortunately not yet needed – is not sufficient to provide a timely response to a gas supply crisis which goes beyond the level that national measures can mitigate. Further, today's lack of transparency prevents the assessment of the real-time gas supply situation and potential responses within the EU.

The purpose of this Communication is to examine and discuss proposals on how the EU could approach security of gas supply more effectively in the current and future situation and which elements of the current EU policy on gas security supply should be further developed. It is suggested that Directive 2004/67/EC should be revised along the lines proposed in this communication.

1) Scope and better implementation of security of supply standards at national level: i t should be carefully examined whether the mandatory scope of the security of supply standards should be extended beyond households. Especially where electricity production from gas is significant, in the absence of adequate alternative measures (fuel switching, storage of alternative fuel or sufficient spare capacity), supplies to power plants should be ensured also under extreme events.

The Commission should examine with the Member States and the industry whether the differences between the definition of roles and responsibilities of market players imply a market distortion or a hindrance to cross-border cooperation in case of crises. A thorough analysis should be carried out for each country to see: i) whether the individually defined security of supply standards are proportionate to the risks incurred; ii) whether the differences impact the competition or constitute a hindrance to solidarity agreements.

The following questions should be examined: are there other events which should be considered beyond partial disruption and extreme winter conditions? What should be the minimum level of short-term security of supply that every Member State individually has to be prepared for? How should it be defined? This Commission makes suggestions to these questions.

2) Community mechanism and solidarity : the gas markets, dominated (90%) by pipeline gas, have a mainly regional character : several countries are linked along the same major pipeline infrastructure. Therefore these Member States usually depend on each other's actions and consumption. If for example there is a shortfall of supplies on a specific pipeline, Member States should co-operate in the allocation of the available supplies, reduction of consumption, increase in withdrawal from storage etc. Within the EU, gas is physically transported only through pipelines therefore regional coordination could provide a timely response which EU-level actions might be unable to do. However, for the same reason, a supply shortage is most likely to affect a whole region, which might not be able to cope with it alone. Therefore a further step could be introduced to the levels of intervention: (1) industry, (2) Member States, (3) regional, (4) Community level. If the supply disruption cannot be managed adequately at regional level, the region would have the right to ask for Community assistance.

Pre-defined actions would provide a clear, foreseeable and timely reaction. The defined actions might include: a) a common declaration of an emergency situation, b) allocation of available supplies and infrastructure capacity among the affected countries, c) co-ordinated dispatching, d) activation of emergency measures in unaffected or less affected states in order to increase the amount of gas available to the affected markets.

This approach should lead to the definition of an effective EU Emergency Plan , including a European emergency scale, which will specify the nominal level of gas market operation, prevention mechanisms, as well as different pre-emergency and emergency levels defined by disruption volume and by the economic impact. The Community response would be a de facto solidarity action . Solidarity is by no means charity and adequate compensation mechanisms would have to be worked out. Each Member State should comply with the defined security of supply standards.

3) Transparency : adequate reporting obligations should be proposed, in order to increase transparency and assess the EU security of supply situation. The measures proposed in the third package on internal energy market to increase transparency should be taken into account: assessment of future supply and demand by the European network of TSOs, the obligation to publish aggregated levels of supply and demand, gas in stock and use of gas storage and LNG facilities.

4) The security of supply margin : during a supply shortfall, a gas supply must be guaranteed to households and other entities protected by the Directive. Two elements are needed: a) increase the available gas for the consumers protected by the Directive and b) dispose of sufficient infrastructure to transport the gas to these customers.

This excess gas and capacities could be called the "supply security margin". The extent of this margin could be derived directly from the re-defined national security of supply standards. These amounts could then be expressed as a percentage of average consumption. Spare capacity and "excess gas" should match such an indicator.

5) Strategic storage : strategic gas stocks refer to the stockpiling of natural gas which is destined to be used exclusively in emergency situations, hence inaccessible under normal market conditions. Stockpiling of natural gas is expensive. Member States have different levels of exposure to risks and hence different gas supply security requirements. Strategic stocks might be the preferable or only midterm solution for countries with single-source dependence and high share of uninterruptible demand.

The Commission does not propose an EU-level obligation as regards strategic stocks. If a Member State chooses this option as a national measure, the use of strategic stocks has to be carefully regulated to avoid market distortions: strategic stocks should not be released in non crisis situations to influence the value of storage and other flexibility instruments that are developed under competitive market conditions. Development of commercial storages should be encouraged .

Long-term strategy : although it goes beyond the scope of this Directive, the long-term EU strategy on gas and on energy supply security, as discussed in the Strategic Energy Review , remains crucial.

In order to reduce the risk and the effects of short-term gas supply shocks in the future, the EU has to continue striving for energy efficiency, a well-functioning, well-interconnected internal energy market, innovation and technological developments, diversification of the energy mix, supplies and routes, and effective international frameworks and relations. Transparency and coordination between Member States' actions towards third countries should contribute to strengthen a single voice on energy topics at international level.

2004/04/29
   Final act published in Official Journal
2004/04/26
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
2004/04/26
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2004/04/26
   CSL - Council Meeting
2004/04/20
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament after reconsultation
2004/04/20
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2004/04/19
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2004/03/22
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2004/03/18
   EP - Committee final report tabled for plenary, reconsultation
Documents
2004/03/18
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2004/03/18
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation
Documents
2004/02/18
   EP - Committee Opinion
2004/02/13
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2004/02/11
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2003/12/18
   EP/CSL - Formal reconsultation of Parliament
2003/12/08
   CSL - Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation
Documents
2003/12/08
   EC - Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published
Documents
2003/09/23
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2003/09/23
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2003/09/22
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2003/09/09
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2003/09/09
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2003/09/09
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Documents
2003/07/02
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2003/06/16
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2003/05/23
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2003/05/21
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2003/05/14
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2003/05/14
   CSL - Council Meeting
2003/03/26
   ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
2002/11/27
   EP - Former Committee Opinion
2002/11/27
   EP - Former Committee Opinion
2002/11/12
   EP - Responsible Committee
2002/11/12
   EP - Former Responsible Committee
2002/10/09
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2002/09/11
   EC - Legislative proposal published

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/13/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0769/COM_COM(2008)0769_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0769/COM_COM(2008)0769_EN.pdf
events/15/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:127:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2004:127:TOC
activities
  • date: 2002-09-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2002/0488/COM_COM(2002)0488_EN.pdf title: COM(2002)0488 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52002DC0488:EN body: EC commission: DG: Energy and Transport type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2002-10-09T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2002-11-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: EDD name: BLOKLAND Johannes body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2002-11-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health, Consumer Policy rapporteur: group: NI name: KRONBERGER Hans body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2002-11-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, External Trade, Research, Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: MOMBAUR Peter Michael body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2004-02-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market rapporteur: group: ELDR name: WALLIS Diana body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market committee: JURI
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2507 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=X018*&MEET_DATE=14/05/2003 type: Debate in Council title: X018 council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy date: 2003-05-14T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2002-11-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: EDD name: BLOKLAND Johannes body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2002-11-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health, Consumer Policy rapporteur: group: NI name: KRONBERGER Hans body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2002-11-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, External Trade, Research, Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: MOMBAUR Peter Michael body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2004-02-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market rapporteur: group: ELDR name: WALLIS Diana body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market committee: JURI docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2003-295&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A5-0295/2003 date: 2003-09-09T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2003-09-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20030922&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2003-09-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2003-397 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0397/2003 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2003-12-04T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: X019
  • date: 2003-12-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=15769%2F03&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published title: 15769/2003 body: EC commission: DG: Energy and Transport type: Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published
  • date: 2003-12-18T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Formal reconsultation of Parliament
  • date: 2004-03-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2004-213&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation title: A5-0213/2004 body: unknown type: Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation
  • date: 2004-03-18T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2002-11-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: EDD name: BLOKLAND Johannes body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2002-11-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health, Consumer Policy rapporteur: group: NI name: KRONBERGER Hans body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2002-11-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, External Trade, Research, Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: MOMBAUR Peter Michael body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2004-02-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market rapporteur: group: ELDR name: WALLIS Diana body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market committee: JURI type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2004-04-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20040419&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2004-04-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2004-300 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0300/2004 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2004-04-26T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Agriculture and Fisheries meeting_id: 2578
  • date: 2004-04-26T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2004-04-26T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
  • date: 2004-04-29T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32004L0067 title: Directive 2004/67 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2004:127:TOC title: OJ L 127 29.04.2004, p. 0092-0096
commission
  • body: EC dg: Energy and Transport commissioner: --
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, External Trade, Research, Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2002-11-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MOMBAUR Peter Michael group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ECON
date
2002-11-27T00:00:00
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
rapporteur
group: EDD name: BLOKLAND Johannes
committees/1
type
Former Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, External Trade, Research, Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2002-11-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MOMBAUR Peter Michael group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ENVI
date
2002-11-27T00:00:00
committee_full
Environment, Public Health, Consumer Policy
rapporteur
group: NI name: KRONBERGER Hans
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs and Internal Market
committee
JURI
date
2004-02-18T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: WALLIS Diana group: European Liberal Democrat and Reform Party abbr: ELDR
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
ITRE
date
2002-11-12T00:00:00
committee_full
Industry, External Trade, Research, Energy
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: MOMBAUR Peter Michael
committees/3
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2002-11-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BLOKLAND Johannes group: Europe of Democracies and Diversities abbr: EDD
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
JURI
date
2004-02-18T00:00:00
committee_full
Legal Affairs and Internal Market
rapporteur
group: ELDR name: WALLIS Diana
committees/4
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs and Internal Market
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs and Internal Market
committee
JURI
committees/5
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health, Consumer Policy
committee
ENVI
date
2002-11-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KRONBERGER Hans group: Non-attached Members abbr: NA
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Agriculture and Fisheries meeting_id: 2578 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2578*&MEET_DATE=26/04/2004 date: 2004-04-26T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: 2507 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2507*&MEET_DATE=14/05/2003 date: 2003-05-14T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2003-03-26T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:1342)(documentyear:2002)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CES1342/2002 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2003:133:TOC title: OJ C 133 06.06.2003, p. 0016-0022 type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report body: ESC
  • date: 2003-05-21T00:00:00 docs: title: PE323.130/DEF committee: ECON type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2003-05-23T00:00:00 docs: title: PE328.762/DEF committee: ENVI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2003-06-16T00:00:00 docs: title: PE321.993 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2003-07-02T00:00:00 docs: title: PE321.993/AM type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2003-09-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2003-295&language=EN title: A5-0295/2003 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2003-09-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2003-397 title: T5-0397/2003 title: OJ C 077 26.03.2004, p. 0022-0059 E summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2003-12-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=15769%2F03&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 15769/2003 type: Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation body: CSL
  • date: 2004-02-11T00:00:00 docs: title: PE340.329 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2004-02-13T00:00:00 docs: title: PE340.329/AM type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2004-03-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2004-213&language=EN title: A5-0213/2004 type: Committee final report tabled for plenary, reconsultation body: EP
  • date: 2004-03-22T00:00:00 docs: title: PE343.488/DEF committee: JURI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2004-04-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2004-300 title: T5-0300/2004 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2004:104E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 104 30.04.2004, p. 0036-0304 E summary: type: Text adopted by Parliament after reconsultation body: EP
  • date: 2008-11-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2008/0769/COM_COM(2008)0769_EN.pdf title: COM(2008)0769 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=769 title: EUR-Lex summary: The Commission presents a Communication on the Directive 2004/67/EC of 26 April 2004 concerning measures to safeguard security of natural gas supply. Security of supply, as one of the three pillars of the energy policy for Europe defined by the European Council in March 2007, is more and more seen as a public good deserving a closer attention from the European Union. Natural gas is currently the second most important fuel in the EU's energy mix, representing roughly a quarter of EU gross inland consumption. It is widely used in various sectors, such as power generation, district heating, households and industry. The Commission considers that the EU needs to take a step forward on security of gas supply and solidarity. While crises may be rare, they can have very high economic and social impacts. Therefore the EU needs to be prepared to tackle security of supply in an effective way. Today's Community mechanism – although fortunately not yet needed – is not sufficient to provide a timely response to a gas supply crisis which goes beyond the level that national measures can mitigate. Further, today's lack of transparency prevents the assessment of the real-time gas supply situation and potential responses within the EU. The purpose of this Communication is to examine and discuss proposals on how the EU could approach security of gas supply more effectively in the current and future situation and which elements of the current EU policy on gas security supply should be further developed. It is suggested that Directive 2004/67/EC should be revised along the lines proposed in this communication. 1) Scope and better implementation of security of supply standards at national level: i t should be carefully examined whether the mandatory scope of the security of supply standards should be extended beyond households. Especially where electricity production from gas is significant, in the absence of adequate alternative measures (fuel switching, storage of alternative fuel or sufficient spare capacity), supplies to power plants should be ensured also under extreme events. The Commission should examine with the Member States and the industry whether the differences between the definition of roles and responsibilities of market players imply a market distortion or a hindrance to cross-border cooperation in case of crises. A thorough analysis should be carried out for each country to see: i) whether the individually defined security of supply standards are proportionate to the risks incurred; ii) whether the differences impact the competition or constitute a hindrance to solidarity agreements. The following questions should be examined: are there other events which should be considered beyond partial disruption and extreme winter conditions? What should be the minimum level of short-term security of supply that every Member State individually has to be prepared for? How should it be defined? This Commission makes suggestions to these questions. 2) Community mechanism and solidarity : the gas markets, dominated (90%) by pipeline gas, have a mainly regional character : several countries are linked along the same major pipeline infrastructure. Therefore these Member States usually depend on each other's actions and consumption. If for example there is a shortfall of supplies on a specific pipeline, Member States should co-operate in the allocation of the available supplies, reduction of consumption, increase in withdrawal from storage etc. Within the EU, gas is physically transported only through pipelines therefore regional coordination could provide a timely response which EU-level actions might be unable to do. However, for the same reason, a supply shortage is most likely to affect a whole region, which might not be able to cope with it alone. Therefore a further step could be introduced to the levels of intervention: (1) industry, (2) Member States, (3) regional, (4) Community level. If the supply disruption cannot be managed adequately at regional level, the region would have the right to ask for Community assistance. Pre-defined actions would provide a clear, foreseeable and timely reaction. The defined actions might include: a) a common declaration of an emergency situation, b) allocation of available supplies and infrastructure capacity among the affected countries, c) co-ordinated dispatching, d) activation of emergency measures in unaffected or less affected states in order to increase the amount of gas available to the affected markets. This approach should lead to the definition of an effective EU Emergency Plan , including a European emergency scale, which will specify the nominal level of gas market operation, prevention mechanisms, as well as different pre-emergency and emergency levels defined by disruption volume and by the economic impact. The Community response would be a de facto solidarity action . Solidarity is by no means charity and adequate compensation mechanisms would have to be worked out. Each Member State should comply with the defined security of supply standards. 3) Transparency : adequate reporting obligations should be proposed, in order to increase transparency and assess the EU security of supply situation. The measures proposed in the third package on internal energy market to increase transparency should be taken into account: assessment of future supply and demand by the European network of TSOs, the obligation to publish aggregated levels of supply and demand, gas in stock and use of gas storage and LNG facilities. 4) The security of supply margin : during a supply shortfall, a gas supply must be guaranteed to households and other entities protected by the Directive. Two elements are needed: a) increase the available gas for the consumers protected by the Directive and b) dispose of sufficient infrastructure to transport the gas to these customers. This excess gas and capacities could be called the "supply security margin". The extent of this margin could be derived directly from the re-defined national security of supply standards. These amounts could then be expressed as a percentage of average consumption. Spare capacity and "excess gas" should match such an indicator. 5) Strategic storage : strategic gas stocks refer to the stockpiling of natural gas which is destined to be used exclusively in emergency situations, hence inaccessible under normal market conditions. Stockpiling of natural gas is expensive. Member States have different levels of exposure to risks and hence different gas supply security requirements. Strategic stocks might be the preferable or only midterm solution for countries with single-source dependence and high share of uninterruptible demand. The Commission does not propose an EU-level obligation as regards strategic stocks. If a Member State chooses this option as a national measure, the use of strategic stocks has to be carefully regulated to avoid market distortions: strategic stocks should not be released in non crisis situations to influence the value of storage and other flexibility instruments that are developed under competitive market conditions. Development of commercial storages should be encouraged . Long-term strategy : although it goes beyond the scope of this Directive, the long-term EU strategy on gas and on energy supply security, as discussed in the Strategic Energy Review , remains crucial. In order to reduce the risk and the effects of short-term gas supply shocks in the future, the EU has to continue striving for energy efficiency, a well-functioning, well-interconnected internal energy market, innovation and technological developments, diversification of the energy mix, supplies and routes, and effective international frameworks and relations. Transparency and coordination between Member States' actions towards third countries should contribute to strengthen a single voice on energy topics at international level. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2009-07-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2009/0978/COM_SEC(2009)0978_EN.pdf title: SEC(2009)0978 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2009&nu_doc=978 title: EUR-Lex summary: In order to strengthen the security of gas supply in the internal market, Council Directive 2004/67/EC concerning measures to safeguard security of natural gas supplies was adopted (see COD/2009/0108 ). The Directive provides that the Commission shall present an evaluation report on the implementation of the Directive by Member States, which is the purpose of this Commission Staff Working Document. Transposition : most of the Member States have transposed the security of gas supply provisions of the Directive as part of their internal gas market legislation. Differences in the security of gas supply roles of market players : Member States have defined the roles for their market players in a different way, which has created distortion for security of gas supply in European internal gas markets. Security of supply standards : Member States have set very heterogeneous security of supply standards and in some Member States the definition of standards has not been made. These differences may create a barrier to the solidarity mechanism and to the finalisation of the internal gas market. Security of gas supply instruments : the balance of various instruments is essential to enhancing the security of gas supply. The most frequent measures are gas storage, long term contracts, flexibility of production and imports and diversifications of gas supply. The general conclusion is that the level playing field within the EU has not been reached in terms of security of gas supply instruments. National emergency measures : the two-step approach used by Member States has created a delay in full transposition of this provision and means that the Commission could only assess national emergency measures of 18 Member States. In any event, most of the Member States have defined their national emergency measures in a systematic way creating the national emergency plans. In these plans they also included prevention mechanisms, nominal level of gas market operation and different pre-emergency and emergency levels defined by disruption volume and by the economic impact. Monitoring and reporting : Member States’ reporting obligations are set out in two gas Directives. Member States have not prepared their annual internal market report in a proper way and much of the mandated information is not included in those reports. Therefore, the Commission had to prepare additional questionnaires and data tables to fulfil its monitoring obligation, which created an additional administrative burden. Moreover, the obligation concerning what to monitor is not sufficient to assess either the current long-term and short-term, or any future security of supply situation of the EU and the effectiveness of the mitigation tools. In addition, reporting obligations are limited in frequency and scope and only three Member States provided complete reporting. Greater transparency is therefore needed. type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
events
  • date: 2002-09-11T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2002/0488/COM_COM(2002)0488_EN.pdf title: COM(2002)0488 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2002&nu_doc=488 title: EUR-Lex summary:
  • date: 2002-10-09T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2003-05-14T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2507*&MEET_DATE=14/05/2003 title: 2507 summary:
  • date: 2003-09-09T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary:
  • date: 2003-09-09T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2003-295&language=EN title: A5-0295/2003
  • date: 2003-09-22T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20030922&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2003-09-23T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2003-397 title: T5-0397/2003 summary:
  • date: 2003-12-08T00:00:00 type: Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published body: EC docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=15769%2F03&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 15769/2003
  • date: 2003-12-18T00:00:00 type: Formal reconsultation of Parliament body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2004-03-18T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary:
  • date: 2004-03-18T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2004-213&language=EN title: A5-0213/2004
  • date: 2004-04-19T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20040419&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2004-04-20T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2004-300 title: T5-0300/2004 summary:
  • date: 2004-04-26T00:00:00 type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2004-04-26T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2004-04-29T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: title: Directive 2004/67 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32004L0067 title: OJ L 127 29.04.2004, p. 0092-0096 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:127:SOM:EN:HTML
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: Energy and Transport
procedure/final/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32004L0067
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32004L0067
procedure/instrument
Old
Directive
New
  • Directive
  • Repealed by 2009/0108(COD)
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.60.03 Gas, electricity, natural gas, biogas
  • 3.60.10 Security of energy supply
New
3.60.03
Gas, electricity, natural gas, biogas
3.60.10
Security of energy supply
procedure/summary
  • Repealed by
activities/2/meeting_id
Old
X018
New
2507
activities/16/docs/1/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:127:SOM:EN:HTML
New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2004:127:TOC
links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
activities/2/meeting_id
Old
2507
New
X018
activities/16/docs/1/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2004:127:TOC
New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:127:SOM:EN:HTML
activities
  • date: 2002-09-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2002/0488/COM_COM(2002)0488_EN.pdf title: COM(2002)0488 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52002DC0488:EN body: EC type: Legislative proposal published commission: DG: Energy and Transport
  • date: 2002-10-09T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2002-11-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: EDD name: BLOKLAND Johannes body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2002-11-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health, Consumer Policy rapporteur: group: NI name: KRONBERGER Hans body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2002-11-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, External Trade, Research, Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: MOMBAUR Peter Michael body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2004-02-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market rapporteur: group: ELDR name: WALLIS Diana body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market committee: JURI
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2507 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=X018*&MEET_DATE=14/05/2003 type: Debate in Council title: X018 council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy date: 2003-05-14T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2002-11-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: EDD name: BLOKLAND Johannes body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2002-11-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health, Consumer Policy rapporteur: group: NI name: KRONBERGER Hans body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2002-11-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, External Trade, Research, Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: MOMBAUR Peter Michael body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2004-02-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market rapporteur: group: ELDR name: WALLIS Diana body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market committee: JURI docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2003-295&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A5-0295/2003 date: 2003-09-09T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2003-09-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20030922&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2003-09-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2003-397 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0397/2003 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2003-12-04T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Transport, Telecommunications and Energy meeting_id: X019
  • date: 2003-12-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=15769%2F03&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published title: 15769/2003 body: EC type: Amended legislative proposal for reconsultation published commission: DG: Energy and Transport
  • date: 2003-12-18T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Formal reconsultation of Parliament
  • date: 2004-03-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A5-2004-213&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation title: A5-0213/2004 body: unknown type: Committee report tabled for plenary, reconsultation
  • date: 2004-03-18T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2002-11-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: EDD name: BLOKLAND Johannes body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2002-11-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health, Consumer Policy rapporteur: group: NI name: KRONBERGER Hans body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2002-11-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, External Trade, Research, Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: MOMBAUR Peter Michael body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2004-02-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market rapporteur: group: ELDR name: WALLIS Diana body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market committee: JURI type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2004-04-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20040419&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2004-04-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P5-TA-2004-300 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T5-0300/2004 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2004-04-26T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Agriculture and Fisheries meeting_id: 2578
  • date: 2004-04-26T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament
  • date: 2004-04-26T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
  • date: 2004-04-29T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32004L0067 title: Directive 2004/67 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2004:127:TOC title: OJ L 127 29.04.2004, p. 0092-0096
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2002-11-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: EDD name: BLOKLAND Johannes
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2002-11-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health, Consumer Policy rapporteur: group: NI name: KRONBERGER Hans
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2002-11-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, External Trade, Research, Energy rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: MOMBAUR Peter Michael
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2004-02-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market rapporteur: group: ELDR name: WALLIS Diana
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs and Internal Market committee: JURI
links
European Commission
other
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Former Council configuration
  • body: EC dg: Energy and Transport
procedure
reference
2002/0220(CNS)
subtype
Legislation
legal_basis
EC Treaty (after Amsterdam) EC 095
stage_reached
Procedure completed
summary
Repealed by
instrument
Directive
title
Energy: natural gas, security of supply
type
CNS - Consultation procedure
final
subject