BETA
This is a historical view (2015/11/04)

Changes: 2023/08/03docs.docs.url, docs, 2021/12/18docs.docs.url, events, events.type, procedure.legal_basis, events.docs.url, committees.rapporteur

View current state | View Changes for this date

Sorry, but we failed to recreate history before 2020-01-19T22:49:16


2004/2225(INI) The effect of globalisation on the internal market

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead IMCO HERCZOG Edit (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion ENVI MARKOV Helmuth (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Committee Opinion INTA
Committee Opinion EMPL
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 052

Events

2006/07/04
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2006/03/09
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2006/02/14
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2006/02/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Edit HERCZOG (PES, HU) on the effects of globalisation on the internal market. Statistical data suggest that the EU has been facing challenges concerning the retention of its leading position in key areas such as economic growth, labour market performance, research and innovation. However, Parliament felt that globalisation should not be considered exclusively as a negative factor leading to social fragmentation. It should rather be seen as a framework, on the one hand providing new opportunities in the form of access to the worldwide market, but on the other, posing the threat of EU dependency on the development of worldwide trade. This is why political management should support positive and eliminate negative influences on the internal market. The latter must be made more flexible and globally oriented, while, at the same time, finding ways to deliver growth, jobs, social justice and respect for ecological balance and maintaining the EU's values and social model.

Parliament stated that in order to realise potential gains from globalisation, the EU must adapt to global economic changes; advance in areas of economic strength, such as the medium-high technology sector; address its weaknesses, as in the high-technology sector, including information and communication technology and bio-technology, and develop new areas of comparative advantage. A strategy for facing the challenges of globalisation must include a call for clear political commitment for the completion of the internal market as the EU's strongest asset to maximise the advantages of globalisation.

Parliament highlighted the concerns expressed by the Commission, in its Communication on European values in the globalised world ( COM(2005)0525 ), about the impact of globalisation on European workers. It was of the opinion that the Lisbon Strategy as a general economic plan might not be enough to deal with globalisation and called for other action lines that may be developed specifically to cushion the negative effects of globalisation and to help take advantage of its positive effects (such as a globalisation adjustment fund).

Parliament felt that the following factors were important in the development of a strategy for facing the challenges of globalisation:

- successful strategies to safeguard European values in a competitive global environment and to give effect to those values in the shaping of global policies;

- developing the European tradition of excellence and ensuring as a priority the establishment of a high level education system accompanied by a corresponding financial basis for research and development and innovation;

- a common knowledge-management system with efficient knowledge-protection tools and the need for an effective programme to turn innovation into investment and economic value;

- the protection of intellectual and industrial property rights, inter alia by setting up integrated and efficient patenting schemes, along with effective regulation and control on counterfeiting, in order to protect European economic interests;

- continuing the Better Regulation programme at both EU and national level;

- faster and more efficient dispute resolution within the internal market;

- speeding up transposition of internal market rules;

- an analysis of the non-market factors of the EU economy which are connected to the challenges of globalisation within the EU (such as demographic challenge) and worldwide (such as responsibility towards third world countries);

- the application of clear labelling rules and the observance of denominations of origin as means of guaranteeing the protection of European goods and values.

Parliament went on to call on the Commission to increase preferential access to the EU market for those third countries that have ratified and appropriately applied core international labour and environmental standards, and to grant further preferential market access to countries that have adopted legislation on social and environmental protection and respect for cultural diversity.

It applauded those Member States that have opened up their labour markets to citizens from the new Member States and thus have significantly contributed to a more mobile and competitive internal market in employment. Member States that still maintain restrictions in this regard were urged to eliminate existing obstacles to the free movement of labour.

Parliament stated that it was committed to developing a regular ex-post impact assessment procedure to evaluate the effects and implementation of economic and internal market regulation. It called on the Commission to do likewise. The Commission should also carry out impact assessments on the effect on the internal market of further multilateral market opening in agriculture, manufacturing and services. These assessments should be shared with a wide range of stake-holders before the Commission formulated its trade negotiation strategy in international trade negotiations.

Finally, Parliament pointed out that the creation of an internal market in services is essential in order to achieve the Lisbon Strategy goals and, therefore, to increase the EU's competitiveness on the world market.

Documents
2006/02/14
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2006/02/13
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2006/02/01
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2006/02/01
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2006/01/30
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The committee adopted the own-initiative report by Edit HERCZOG (PES, HU) on the effects of globalisation on the internal market.

Noting that the EU, over the past few years, had been facing challenges to retain its leading position in key areas such as economic growth, labour market performance, research and innovation, MEPs argued that the key to solving these problems lay in the completion of the internal market, "the EU's strongest asset to maximise the advantages of globalisation". A flexible and globally-oriented internal market should go hand in hand with efforts "to deliver growth, jobs, social justice and respect for ecological balance while maintaining [ Europe 's] values and [its] social model."

In calling for bold steps to complete the internal market the report "applauds those Member States which have opened up their labour markets for citizens from the new Member States" and urged those Member States which still maintain restrictions in this regard to eliminate existing obstacles to the free movement of labour. The Commission, meanwhile, should develop an "efficient and regular ex-post impact assessment procedure" to gauge the effects and implementation of economic and internal market regulation.

Noting the EU's struggle to attain the goals set forth by the Lisbon Agenda, MEPs said that the Lisbon Strategy, as a general economic plan, "may not be enough to deal with globalisation". They called for "other action lines" (such as a Globalisation Adjustment Fund) to cushion the negative effects of globalisation and to help take advantage of its positive effects.

The report also stressed the need for a "common knowledge management system with efficient protection tools for knowledge". It called for intellectual and industrial property rights to be protected through integrated and efficient patenting schemes, along with effective regulation and controls on counterfeiting. It also underlined the importance of " clear labelling rules and observance of denominations of origin as means of guaranteeing the protection of European goods and values".

Among other recommendations, MEPs called on the Commission to increase preferential access to the EU market for those third countries which have ratified and "appropriately applied" core international labour and environmental standards. Lastly, they urged the Commission to make an assessment of the impact on the internal market of further multilateral market opening in agriculture, manufacturing and services, and to consult with a wide range of stakeholders before formulating its trade negotiation strategy in international trade negotiations.

2006/01/05
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2005/12/06
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2005/11/10
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2005/01/17
   EP - MARKOV Helmuth (GUE/NGL) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2004/11/30
   EP - HERCZOG Edit (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in IMCO
2004/11/18
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading

Documents

Activities

Votes

Rapport Herczog A6-0021/2006 - am. 1 #

2006/02/14 Outcome: +: 448, -: 179, 0: 16
DE ES FR PL IT HU AT PT EL SK BE IE NL LV SE LU EE SI MT FI CY DK LT CZ GB
Total
90
45
71
52
53
20
18
21
22
14
22
12
26
8
17
5
5
6
5
11
6
9
12
23
70
icon: PSE PSE
183

Ireland PSE

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Denmark PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
235

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2

Finland PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
37

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

4
icon: UEN UEN
26

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: NI NI
28

Austria NI

Against (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

Belgium NI

Against (1)

3

Czechia NI

1

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
29

France IND/DEM

2

Italy IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34

France GUE/NGL

Against (2)

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
71
2

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
rapporteur
name: HERCZOG Edit date: 2004-11-30T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2004-11-30T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HERCZOG Edit group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: MARKOV Helmuth date: 2005-01-17T00:00:00 group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2005-01-17T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MARKOV Helmuth group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-21&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0021_EN.html
docs/4/body
EC
docs/5/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-21&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0021_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-55
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0055_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2004-11-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2004-11-30T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PSE name: HERCZOG Edit body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2005-01-17T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: MARKOV Helmuth
  • date: 2006-01-30T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2004-11-30T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PSE name: HERCZOG Edit body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2005-01-17T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: MARKOV Helmuth type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-02-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-21&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0021/2006 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2006-02-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060213&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-02-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4477&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-55 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0055/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2004-11-30T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HERCZOG Edit group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2005-01-17T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MARKOV Helmuth group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
IMCO
date
2004-11-30T00:00:00
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
rapporteur
group: PSE name: HERCZOG Edit
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
INTA
date
2005-01-17T00:00:00
committee_full
International Trade
rapporteur
group: GUE/NGL name: MARKOV Helmuth
docs
  • date: 2005-11-10T00:00:00 docs: title: PE360.120 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2005-12-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/commissions/imco/amendments/2005/365155/IMCO_AM(2005)365155_EN.pdf title: PE365.155 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2006-01-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE360.319&secondRef=02 title: PE360.319 committee: INTA type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2006-02-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-21&language=EN title: A6-0021/2006 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-03-09T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4477&j=1&l=en title: SP(2006)1012 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2006-07-04T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4477&j=0&l=en title: SP(2006)1347 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2004-11-18T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-01-30T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the own-initiative report by Edit HERCZOG (PES, HU) on the effects of globalisation on the internal market. Noting that the EU, over the past few years, had been facing challenges to retain its leading position in key areas such as economic growth, labour market performance, research and innovation, MEPs argued that the key to solving these problems lay in the completion of the internal market, "the EU's strongest asset to maximise the advantages of globalisation". A flexible and globally-oriented internal market should go hand in hand with efforts "to deliver growth, jobs, social justice and respect for ecological balance while maintaining [ Europe 's] values and [its] social model." In calling for bold steps to complete the internal market the report "applauds those Member States which have opened up their labour markets for citizens from the new Member States" and urged those Member States which still maintain restrictions in this regard to eliminate existing obstacles to the free movement of labour. The Commission, meanwhile, should develop an "efficient and regular ex-post impact assessment procedure" to gauge the effects and implementation of economic and internal market regulation. Noting the EU's struggle to attain the goals set forth by the Lisbon Agenda, MEPs said that the Lisbon Strategy, as a general economic plan, "may not be enough to deal with globalisation". They called for "other action lines" (such as a Globalisation Adjustment Fund) to cushion the negative effects of globalisation and to help take advantage of its positive effects. The report also stressed the need for a "common knowledge management system with efficient protection tools for knowledge". It called for intellectual and industrial property rights to be protected through integrated and efficient patenting schemes, along with effective regulation and controls on counterfeiting. It also underlined the importance of " clear labelling rules and observance of denominations of origin as means of guaranteeing the protection of European goods and values". Among other recommendations, MEPs called on the Commission to increase preferential access to the EU market for those third countries which have ratified and "appropriately applied" core international labour and environmental standards. Lastly, they urged the Commission to make an assessment of the impact on the internal market of further multilateral market opening in agriculture, manufacturing and services, and to consult with a wide range of stakeholders before formulating its trade negotiation strategy in international trade negotiations.
  • date: 2006-02-01T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-21&language=EN title: A6-0021/2006
  • date: 2006-02-13T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060213&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-02-14T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4477&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2006-02-14T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-55 title: T6-0055/2006 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Edit HERCZOG (PES, HU) on the effects of globalisation on the internal market. Statistical data suggest that the EU has been facing challenges concerning the retention of its leading position in key areas such as economic growth, labour market performance, research and innovation. However, Parliament felt that globalisation should not be considered exclusively as a negative factor leading to social fragmentation. It should rather be seen as a framework, on the one hand providing new opportunities in the form of access to the worldwide market, but on the other, posing the threat of EU dependency on the development of worldwide trade. This is why political management should support positive and eliminate negative influences on the internal market. The latter must be made more flexible and globally oriented, while, at the same time, finding ways to deliver growth, jobs, social justice and respect for ecological balance and maintaining the EU's values and social model. Parliament stated that in order to realise potential gains from globalisation, the EU must adapt to global economic changes; advance in areas of economic strength, such as the medium-high technology sector; address its weaknesses, as in the high-technology sector, including information and communication technology and bio-technology, and develop new areas of comparative advantage. A strategy for facing the challenges of globalisation must include a call for clear political commitment for the completion of the internal market as the EU's strongest asset to maximise the advantages of globalisation. Parliament highlighted the concerns expressed by the Commission, in its Communication on European values in the globalised world ( COM(2005)0525 ), about the impact of globalisation on European workers. It was of the opinion that the Lisbon Strategy as a general economic plan might not be enough to deal with globalisation and called for other action lines that may be developed specifically to cushion the negative effects of globalisation and to help take advantage of its positive effects (such as a globalisation adjustment fund). Parliament felt that the following factors were important in the development of a strategy for facing the challenges of globalisation: - successful strategies to safeguard European values in a competitive global environment and to give effect to those values in the shaping of global policies; - developing the European tradition of excellence and ensuring as a priority the establishment of a high level education system accompanied by a corresponding financial basis for research and development and innovation; - a common knowledge-management system with efficient knowledge-protection tools and the need for an effective programme to turn innovation into investment and economic value; - the protection of intellectual and industrial property rights, inter alia by setting up integrated and efficient patenting schemes, along with effective regulation and control on counterfeiting, in order to protect European economic interests; - continuing the Better Regulation programme at both EU and national level; - faster and more efficient dispute resolution within the internal market; - speeding up transposition of internal market rules; - an analysis of the non-market factors of the EU economy which are connected to the challenges of globalisation within the EU (such as demographic challenge) and worldwide (such as responsibility towards third world countries); - the application of clear labelling rules and the observance of denominations of origin as means of guaranteeing the protection of European goods and values. Parliament went on to call on the Commission to increase preferential access to the EU market for those third countries that have ratified and appropriately applied core international labour and environmental standards, and to grant further preferential market access to countries that have adopted legislation on social and environmental protection and respect for cultural diversity. It applauded those Member States that have opened up their labour markets to citizens from the new Member States and thus have significantly contributed to a more mobile and competitive internal market in employment. Member States that still maintain restrictions in this regard were urged to eliminate existing obstacles to the free movement of labour. Parliament stated that it was committed to developing a regular ex-post impact assessment procedure to evaluate the effects and implementation of economic and internal market regulation. It called on the Commission to do likewise. The Commission should also carry out impact assessments on the effect on the internal market of further multilateral market opening in agriculture, manufacturing and services. These assessments should be shared with a wide range of stake-holders before the Commission formulated its trade negotiation strategy in international trade negotiations. Finally, Parliament pointed out that the creation of an internal market in services is essential in order to achieve the Lisbon Strategy goals and, therefore, to increase the EU's competitiveness on the world market.
  • date: 2006-02-14T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    IMCO/6/24619
    New
    • IMCO/6/24619
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 052
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 2 Internal market, single market
    New
    2
    Internal market, single market
    procedure/subject/0
    Old
    2 Internal market, SLIM
    New
    2 Internal market, single market
    activities
    • date: 2004-11-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2004-11-30T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PSE name: HERCZOG Edit body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2005-01-17T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: MARKOV Helmuth
    • date: 2006-01-30T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2004-11-30T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PSE name: HERCZOG Edit body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2005-01-17T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: MARKOV Helmuth type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    • date: 2006-02-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-21&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0021/2006 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    • date: 2006-02-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060213&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2006-02-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4477&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-55 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0055/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
    • body: EP responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2004-11-30T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PSE name: HERCZOG Edit
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2005-01-17T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: MARKOV Helmuth
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      IMCO/6/24619
      reference
      2004/2225(INI)
      title
      The effect of globalisation on the internal market
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
      stage_reached
      Procedure completed
      subtype
      Initiative
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject
      2 Internal market, SLIM