BETA


2005/2247(INI) Assessment of the Doha Round following the WTO Ministerial Conference in Hong Kong

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead INTA PAPASTAMKOS Georgios (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion ITRE RÜBIG Paul (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion DEVE MARTENS Maria (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion AGRI DAUL Joseph (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion ECON STARKEVIČIŪTĖ Margarita (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2006/06/30
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2006/05/11
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2006/04/04
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2006/04/04
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted the own-initiative report by Giorgios PAPASTAMKOS (EPP-ED, EL) on the assessment of the Doha Round following the WTO Ministerial Conference in Hong Kong. The non-binding report was adopted by 493 votes in favour to 103 against with 25 abstentions. (Please refer to the summary dated 22/02/2006).

Furthermore, it should be added that the Parliament highlighted the important offer made by the EU to abolish its export refund system by 2013 and insisted that a parallel move by other WTO members was required in the areas of export credits, State trading enterprises and food aid. It emphasised that 2013 is an end-date for this process and calls for a frontloading of a substantial part of the cuts in the first half of the implementation period.

In addition, the importance of encouraging public and political support for the WTO multilateral trading system has been stressed. Parliament notes that companies have a legitimate interest in shaping policies that affect how they do business and that the participation of different groups, including NGOs, is crucial to the WTO's functioning. It stresses, however, that corporate and NGO priorities disproportionately influence the WTO's policy agenda and could play a bigger role than democratically elected parliamentarians with regard to the final document. The Commission is urged to carefully examine the role of companies and NGOs in the negotiation process and there is a need for increased transparency and the reduction of corporate and NGO privileges. Equally, Parliament stresses that better information of the public and wider consultation of civil society are needed and it reiterates, in this respect, the important contribution the parliamentary dimension can make as a means of strengthening the WTO's democratic accountability and openness to the citizens.

The importance of the work of the Parliamentary Conference on the WTO in strengthening the democratic dimension of the WTO is also stressed. Parliament notes, however, the lack of consideration given to its Final Declarations by WTO negotiators. It acknowledges the effort made by EU negotiators to address the Parliamentary Conference on the WTO but deplores the lack of engagement of other WTO negotiators.

Lastly, the importance of Parliament being represented at all WTO meetings at which major steps in the negotiations are taken and where ministers are involved and not only on the occasion of official Ministerial Conferences is stressed. Parliament requests, therefore, that a small delegation of MEPs be meaningfully involved in the meetings to be convened in Geneva with a view to meeting the 30 April and 31 July 2006 deadlines set in the Hong Kong Declaration. The Council is invited to extend an invitation to such a delegation of MEPs to participate, as observers, in at least one of the meetings of the 133 Committee to be organised in Geneva at the end of April 2006. The Commission is called upon to support this initiative and to ensure that members of the Parliament receive appropriate information on the progress of negotiations during their stay in Geneva.

Documents
2006/04/04
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2006/04/03
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2006/03/01
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2006/03/01
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2006/02/22
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The committee adopted the own-initiative report by Giorgios PAPASTAMKOS (EPP-ED, EL) on the assessment of the Doha Round following the WTO Ministerial Conference in Hong Kong.

Deploring the slow progress in the negotiations so far and the "predetermined low level of ambition" for the outcome of the Ministerial Conference in Hong Kong, MEPs called for a greater commitment of all major players, including the EU, the US and the emerging economies. Industrialised countries and advanced developing countries should engage constructively in real negotiations to reach a successful conclusion. The report said that "the target of 2006 for the conclusion of the Round simply must not be missed". And it stressed that a successful conclusion of the negotiations must contribute to achieving the 2015 Millennium Development Goals.

On agriculture, the committee said that the commitments made by the Commission during the negotiations at the WTO must not go beyond the bounds of the current CAP arrangements or the negotiating mandate. It recalled the scope of the Luxembourg agreement on CAP reform and insisted on the need to define ‘green box’ measures, including decoupled support. MEPs also deplored the absence of progress on the establishment of a register for wines and spirits as well as on the extension of geographical indications to other products. The report asked the Commission to consider the possibility of introducing a ‘development box’ for the Least Developed Countries into the agricultural negotiations, so that they can tackle food safety and rural employment - major issues when it comes to eradicating poverty.

The committee said that negotiations on non-agricultural market access should lead to ambitious and balanced results, guaranteeing new real market access opportunities. Given the lack of progress in the services area, the report called for the intensification of negotiations at both bilateral and multilateral levels, with due regard for the interests of weak and vulnerable economies. It reiterated that essential public services, such as health, education and audiovisual services, should be excluded from liberalisation. However, it insisted that the EU should continue emphasising the liberalisation of services and the opening of markets, especially in the finance, tourist and distribution sectors, which are important for the European economy.

MEPs also called for strengthened discipline with regard to anti-dumping and other rules issues in order to prevent abusive recourse to trade defence instruments while preserving the legitimate use and effectiveness of these instruments. Among other points, the report called on the EU negotiators within the WTO to start formulating an EU position on energy that introduces greater security of supply and stronger market forces in this field. Lastly, it called for institutional reform to improve the functioning of the WTO and reiterated the importance of a parliamentary dimension for the WTO to enhance its democratic legitimacy and transparency, given that members of Parliament can constitute an important link with citizens.

2006/02/21
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2006/02/20
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2006/02/20
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2006/02/20
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2006/02/20
   CSL - Debate in Council
Details

Commissioner Fischer-Boel informed the Council on the latest state of play of the negotiations at the WTO. She insisted on the following issues:

- the European Communities must remain united on the WTO negotiations;

- bilateral meetings had been held in Geneva since the beginning of the year with certain WTO partners in order to seek for common ground on sensitive products and to build up alliances;

- the offensive interests of the Community in Agriculture remain domestic supports and export refunds; she agreed with the Netherlands delegation to discuss the phasing out of the export refunds on their overall budgetary value rather than on their volume;

- the Commission will not table any new offer on agriculture following the last offer issued on 28 October 2005; she made clear in reference to remarks raised by the French delegation, that this offer was within the mandate granted by the Council to the Commission for the negotiations at the WTO, and that Geographical Indications were still being discussed; in response to a question raised by the Polish delegation, she also stated that the special safeguard clause was not to be given up;

- the importance of pursuing non-trade concerns, including those on Geographical Indications;

- despite a complicated schedule, the principle remained that "nothing could be agreed until everything is agreed";

- the Commissioner undertook to keep the Council fully informed of the state of play on WTO negotiations and to report to the next Council meeting on 20th March in the light of the planned G6 Ministerial meeting to be held in London in the beginning of March.

The Presidency repeated its intention to keep this issue on the agenda of forthcoming Council meetings.

Documents
2006/02/20
   CSL - Council Meeting
2006/02/13
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2006/01/30
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2006/01/30
   CSL - Council Meeting
2006/01/19
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2005/12/20
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2005/12/20
   CSL - Council Meeting
2005/12/15
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2005/12/13
   EP - RÜBIG Paul (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE
2005/12/13
   EP - STARKEVIČIŪTĖ Margarita (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in ECON
2005/12/01
   EP - MARTENS Maria (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE
2005/11/23
   EP - DAUL Joseph (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in AGRI
2005/06/13
   EP - PAPASTAMKOS Georgios (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in INTA

Documents

Activities

Votes

Rapport Papastamkos A6-0051/2006 - am. 17 #

2006/04/04 Outcome: -: 510, +: 85, 0: 22
EL CY ?? LU MT EE LV SI DK FI AT IE CZ SK SE LT PT BE NL HU IT ES FR PL DE GB
Total
23
5
1
6
5
6
9
7
12
12
16
9
22
13
18
11
21
19
24
18
35
43
70
53
90
69
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
37

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Italy Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
26

Greece IND/DEM

1

IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
23

Austria NI

1

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

3

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: UEN UEN
21

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1

Italy UEN

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
71

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Spain ALDE

1
icon: PSE PSE
179

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

2

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

3

Lithuania PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
225

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Rapport Papastamkos A6-0051/2006 - am. 18 #

2006/04/04 Outcome: -: 511, +: 89, 0: 17
CY DK ?? EL LU MT IE FI EE LV SI SE CZ AT SK LT NL PT BE HU IT ES FR PL DE GB
Total
5
13
1
23
5
5
9
12
6
9
7
18
22
17
13
11
24
21
19
18
36
43
69
53
90
68
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
35

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
26

Denmark IND/DEM

1

IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
24

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

3

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: UEN UEN
21

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1

Italy UEN

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
72

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1
4

Spain ALDE

1
icon: PSE PSE
180

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

Against (1)

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

3

Lithuania PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
224

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Ireland PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Rapport Papastamkos A6-0051/2006 - par. 3/3 #

2006/04/04 Outcome: +: 520, -: 83, 0: 17
GB DE PL FR ES IT BE EL NL HU PT SE LT CZ SK DK IE FI LV SI AT EE MT LU CY ??
Total
69
90
53
69
42
36
22
23
24
17
21
18
11
22
13
13
9
12
9
7
17
6
5
6
5
1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
223
2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
179

Lithuania PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Finland PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
72

Spain ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
21

Italy UEN

2

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
26

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

IND/DEM

1
icon: NI NI
26

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Czechia NI

1

Slovakia NI

3

Austria NI

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Rapport Papastamkos A6-0051/2006 - am. 19/1 #

2006/04/04 Outcome: -: 307, +: 295, 0: 18
FR IT SE PT BE AT ES PL MT EL HU EE CY NL ?? LU FI IE SK SI CZ DK LT LV DE GB
Total
69
36
18
21
21
17
43
53
5
23
18
6
5
24
1
6
12
9
13
7
22
12
11
9
91
68
icon: PSE PSE
179

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Finland PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

France GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
26

Italy IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1
icon: NI NI
26

Austria NI

2

Slovakia NI

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: UEN UEN
21

Italy UEN

2

Ireland UEN

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
71
4

Sweden ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Spain ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
224

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Rapport Papastamkos A6-0051/2006 - am. 19/2 #

2006/04/04 Outcome: -: 513, +: 96, 0: 11
CY ?? LU MT EE DK AT LV SI IE FI BE SE CZ SK LT PT EL NL HU IT PL ES FR DE GB
Total
5
1
5
5
6
13
17
9
7
9
12
21
18
22
13
11
21
23
24
18
36
53
42
70
91
68
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: UEN UEN
21

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1

Italy UEN

2
icon: NI NI
27

Austria NI

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

3

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
26

IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
72

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3
4

Spain ALDE

1
icon: PSE PSE
178

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

3

Lithuania PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
223

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Ireland PPE-DE

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Rapport Papastamkos A6-0051/2006 - am. 20/1 #

2006/04/04 Outcome: +: 447, -: 156, 0: 15
DE GB FR EL PL CZ BE NL IT FI LT DK SI CY AT HU SK LV ES LU PT IE SE EE MT ??
Total
90
69
70
23
52
22
22
24
34
12
11
13
7
5
17
18
13
9
43
5
20
9
18
6
5
1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
224
2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
70

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Spain ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
37

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Italy Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
26

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

3

Greece IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
27

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Czechia NI

1

Austria NI

2

Slovakia NI

3
icon: UEN UEN
21

Italy UEN

2

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3
icon: PSE PSE
178

Czechia PSE

2

Finland PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

Against (1)

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Rapport Papastamkos A6-0051/2006 - am. 20/2 #

2006/04/04 Outcome: -: 439, +: 151, 0: 15
FR AT CY EL ?? LU LV MT IE DK EE FI SE SI BE CZ SK LT PT NL HU IT PL ES GB DE
Total
67
17
5
23
1
5
8
4
9
13
6
11
18
7
22
20
12
10
</