{"change_dates":[],"dossier":{"amendments":[],"changes":{"2014-11-10T01:06:49":[{"data":[{"body":"EC","commission":[{"Commissioner":"FIGE\u013d J\u00e1n","DG":{"title":"Education and Culture","url":"http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/"}}],"date":"2007-11-06T00:00:00","docs":[{"celexid":"CELEX:52007PC0680:EN","text":["
PURPOSE: to\n repeal Council Decision 85/368/EEC on the comparability of vocational\n training qualifications between the Member States of the EC.
PROPOSED ACT: Decision of the\n European Parliament and of the Council.
CONTENT: The\n current proposal forms part of the simplification programme within the\n Commission Legislative and Work Programme for 2007, which aims to simplify\n the regulatory environment for business and other stakeholders. The\n Commission considers that Council Decision 85/368/EEC is redundant and should\n therefore be repealed for the following reasons:
-implementation\n of the Decision has not been effective in achieving the comparability of\n vocational qualifications for the benefit of workers seeking employment in\n another Member State.
-the\n methods and approach used to describe and compare qualifications provided for\n in Decision 85/368/EEC differ from those currently applied in education and\n training systems;
-the\n Decision is superseded by the adoption of the Recommendation on the\n establishment of the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning.
Council\n Decision 85/368/EEC introduced a system for the comparability of vocational\n education and training (VET) qualifications. In practice the system proposed\n by the Decision proved cumbersome and implementation at best partial.\n Procedures for defining job descriptions and comparing qualifications,\n involving the Commission, Cedefop and Member State experts, were established.\n However, a report prepared for the Commission in 1990 detailed the\n difficulties in this process and acknowledged the slow pace of progress - by\n 1990 data on the comparability of qualifications had been published for only\n 5 of the 19 specified sectors, covering 66 occupations. The process of recording,\n describing and comparing qualifications had proven slow and unwieldy.
The\n Decision also proved too inflexible to adapt to changing needs. Although it\n referred to the need to adapt to new situations brought about by\n technological change, the Commission, Cedefop and the Member States came to accept that the centralised approach chosen, and the constant and rapid\n evolution of qualifications, soon made the published information out of date.\n The 1990 report had emphasised that the system would only be effective if\n used by Member States. In reality the work carried out at the European level\n had little impact at the level of national and sectoral stakeholders.
For all\n these reasons, implementation of the activities specified in the Decision was\n soon abandoned.
The\n European Qualifications Framework, or EQF, will seek to replicate the broad\n objective of the 1985 Decision, in aiming to facilitate the comparison of\n qualifications and thereby the mobility of workers. In comparing the two, the\n Commission points out that the 1985 Decision took a top-down approach\n requiring intensive co-operation between experts from different countries to\n update the list, amend descriptions of occupations and qualifications, and\n add new qualifications. The fact that only a limited field of occupations was\n covered reflects the impracticality of such an approach.
The EQF\n adopts a voluntary and decentralised approach where the Community provides a\n common reference point while detailed decisions are left to competent bodies\n at national and sectoral level. The arrangements envisaged for the\n referencing work within countries are not unduly burdensome. Countries relate\n their levelsof qualifications to the EQF, so that any qualification\n falling within a particular level in their national framework or system can\n be given an EQF level rating. The EQF thus provides a common language to\n describe and understand qualifications. The national decisions on placing\n qualifications in the EQF levels are then submitted to the EQF Advisory Group\n which ensures the quality of the process. The EQF thus addresses the\n limitations of the 1985 Decision at two levels: by focusing on improving the\n transparency of qualifications, and by introducing a decentralised approach\n for co-operation more appropriate to the increasing complexity of\n qualifications in Europe. While the EQF will be the instrument which most\n closely pursues the aims and functions the 1985 Decision could not fulfil,\n there are other instruments and measures at European level which promote\n transparency and increase transferability of qualifications. These include\n Europass, the European Credit Transfer System for higher education (ECTS),\n the 2004 Council Conclusions on the identification and validation of\n non-formal and informal learning and the Ploteus portal.
Lastly, the\n Commission points out that the mutual recognition of qualifications in the\n area of regulated professions is ensured by Directive 2005/36/EC.
\nThe Committee on Employment and\n Social Affairs adopted the report by Jan ANDERSSON (PES, SE) approving\n unamended, under the simplified procedure, the proposal for a decision of the\n European Parliament and of the Council repealing Council Decision 85/368/EEC\n on the comparability of vocational training qualifications between the Member\n States of the European Community.
\nThe European Parliament adopted\n by 527 votes to 10, with 34 abstentions, a legislative resolution approving,\n under the first reading of the codecision procedure, the proposal for a\n decision of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing Council\n Decision 85/368/EEC on the comparability of vocational training\n qualifications between the Member States of the European Community.
The report had been tabled for\n consideration in plenary by Jan ANDERSSON (PES, SE) on behalf of the\n Committee on Employment and Social Affairs.
\nPURPOSE: to\n repeal Council Decision 85/368/EEC on the comparability of vocational training\n qualifications between Member States.
LEGISLATIVE\n ACT: Decision No 1065/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing\n Council Decision 85/368/EEC on the comparability of vocational training\n qualifications between the Member States of the European Community.
BACKGROUND: Council\n Decision 85/368/EEC introduced a system for the comparability of vocational\n education and training (VET) qualifications. It aimed to give workers an\n opportunity to make better use of their qualifications to obtain access to\n employment in other Member States. The system defined in the Decision sought\n to achieve this by defining practical job descriptions in specified\n occupations, readable across the Community, and so provide firms, workers,\n and public authorities with the necessary information on the comparability of\n qualifications obtained in various Member States. The Decision called for the\n Commission and Member States to cooperate in drawing up Community job\n descriptions for specific occupations or groups of occupations, and then\n match vocational training qualifications recognised in the Member States with\n these agreed job descriptions. The Decision also required countries to\n designate a coordination body to gather and disseminate information on\n comparable vocational qualifications.
In practice,\n however, the system proposed by the Decision proved cumbersome and\n implementation at best partial. The Commission and Member States concentrated initially on the occupational qualifications of skilled workers. As a first\n step, 219 VET qualifications in 19 sectors were designated (the 19 sectors\n were chosen to reflect occupations whose workers were most likely to move to\n other countries). However, the process of recording, describing and comparing\n qualifications had proven slow and unwieldy. Moreover, the Decision proved\n too inflexible to adapt to changing needs and the Commission and Member\n States came to accept that the centralised approach set out in Decision\n 85/368/ECC, and the constant and rapid evolution of qualifications, soon made\n the published information out of date and the system, as a whole, almost\n impossible to apply.
For all these\n reasons, implementation of the activities specified in the Decision was soon\n abandoned. Its application is therefore rendered useless given the recently\n adopted initiatives taken at EU or inter-governmental level to increase\n transparency, support transfer and facilitate the valuing of learning\n outcomes (in particular, the European Qualifications Network [see COD/2006/0163],\n which seeks to replicate the broad objective of the 1985 Decision, in aiming\n to facilitate the comparison of qualifications and thereby the mobility of\n workers).
CONTENT: the\n only objective of the Decision is therefore to repeal Council Decision\n 85/368/EEC on the comparability of vocational training qualifications between\n Member States, under the Commission's programme to simplify legislation.
The repeal of\n this text is consistent with the Lisbon agenda, in particular the Better\n Regulation strategy and the need to simplify the regulatory environment for\n business and other stakeholders.
ENTRY INTO\n FORCE: 19 November 2008.
\nPURPOSE: to\n repeal Council Decision 85/368/EEC on the comparability of vocational\n training qualifications between the Member States of the EC.
PROPOSED ACT: Decision of the\n European Parliament and of the Council.
CONTENT: The\n current proposal forms part of the simplification programme within the\n Commission Legislative and Work Programme for 2007, which aims to simplify\n the regulatory environment for business and other stakeholders. The\n Commission considers that Council Decision 85/368/EEC is redundant and should\n therefore be repealed for the following reasons:
-implementation\n of the Decision has not been effective in achieving the comparability of\n vocational qualifications for the benefit of workers seeking employment in\n another Member State.
-the\n methods and approach used to describe and compare qualifications provided for\n in Decision 85/368/EEC differ from those currently applied in education and\n training systems;
-the\n Decision is superseded by the adoption of the Recommendation on the\n establishment of the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning.
Council\n Decision 85/368/EEC introduced a system for the comparability of vocational\n education and training (VET) qualifications. In practice the system proposed\n by the Decision proved cumbersome and implementation at best partial.\n Procedures for defining job descriptions and comparing qualifications,\n involving the Commission, Cedefop and Member State experts, were established.\n However, a report prepared for the Commission in 1990 detailed the\n difficulties in this process and acknowledged the slow pace of progress - by\n 1990 data on the comparability of qualifications had been published for only\n 5 of the 19 specified sectors, covering 66 occupations. The process of recording,\n describing and comparing qualifications had proven slow and unwieldy.
The\n Decision also proved too inflexible to adapt to changing needs. Although it\n referred to the need to adapt to new situations brought about by\n technological change, the Commission, Cedefop and the Member States came to accept that the centralised approach chosen, and the constant and rapid\n evolution of qualifications, soon made the published information out of date.\n The 1990 report had emphasised that the system would only be effective if\n used by Member States. In reality the work carried out at the European level\n had little impact at the level of national and sectoral stakeholders.
For all\n these reasons, implementation of the activities specified in the Decision was\n soon abandoned.
The\n European Qualifications Framework, or EQF, will seek to replicate the broad\n objective of the 1985 Decision, in aiming to facilitate the comparison of\n qualifications and thereby the mobility of workers. In comparing the two, the\n Commission points out that the 1985 Decision took a top-down approach\n requiring intensive co-operation between experts from different countries to\n update the list, amend descriptions of occupations and qualifications, and\n add new qualifications. The fact that only a limited field of occupations was\n covered reflects the impracticality of such an approach.
The EQF\n adopts a voluntary and decentralised approach where the Community provides a\n common reference point while detailed decisions are left to competent bodies\n at national and sectoral level. The arrangements envisaged for the\n referencing work within countries are not unduly burdensome. Countries relate\n their levelsof qualifications to the EQF, so that any qualification\n falling within a particular level in their national framework or system can\n be given an EQF level rating. The EQF thus provides a common language to\n describe and understand qualifications. The national decisions on placing\n qualifications in the EQF levels are then submitted to the EQF Advisory Group\n which ensures the quality of the process. The EQF thus addresses the\n limitations of the 1985 Decision at two levels: by focusing on improving the\n transparency of qualifications, and by introducing a decentralised approach\n for co-operation more appropriate to the increasing complexity of\n qualifications in Europe. While the EQF will be the instrument which most\n closely pursues the aims and functions the 1985 Decision could not fulfil,\n there are other instruments and measures at European level which promote\n transparency and increase transferability of qualifications. These include\n Europass, the European Credit Transfer System for higher education (ECTS),\n the 2004 Council Conclusions on the identification and validation of\n non-formal and informal learning and the Ploteus portal.
Lastly, the\n Commission points out that the mutual recognition of qualifications in the\n area of regulated professions is ensured by Directive 2005/36/EC.
\nThe Committee on Employment and\n Social Affairs adopted the report by Jan ANDERSSON (PES, SE) approving\n unamended, under the simplified procedure, the proposal for a decision of the\n European Parliament and of the Council repealing Council Decision 85/368/EEC\n on the comparability of vocational training qualifications between the Member\n States of the European Community.
\nThe European Parliament adopted\n by 527 votes to 10, with 34 abstentions, a legislative resolution approving,\n under the first reading of the codecision procedure, the proposal for a\n decision of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing Council\n Decision 85/368/EEC on the comparability of vocational training\n qualifications between the Member States of the European Community.
The report had been tabled for\n consideration in plenary by Jan ANDERSSON (PES, SE) on behalf of the\n Committee on Employment and Social Affairs.
\nPURPOSE: to\n repeal Council Decision 85/368/EEC on the comparability of vocational training\n qualifications between Member States.
LEGISLATIVE\n ACT: Decision No 1065/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing\n Council Decision 85/368/EEC on the comparability of vocational training\n qualifications between the Member States of the European Community.
BACKGROUND: Council\n Decision 85/368/EEC introduced a system for the comparability of vocational\n education and training (VET) qualifications. It aimed to give workers an\n opportunity to make better use of their qualifications to obtain access to\n employment in other Member States. The system defined in the Decision sought\n to achieve this by defining practical job descriptions in specified\n occupations, readable across the Community, and so provide firms, workers,\n and public authorities with the necessary information on the comparability of\n qualifications obtained in various Member States. The Decision called for the\n Commission and Member States to cooperate in drawing up Community job\n descriptions for specific occupations or groups of occupations, and then\n match vocational training qualifications recognised in the Member States with\n these agreed job descriptions. The Decision also required countries to\n designate a coordination body to gather and disseminate information on\n comparable vocational qualifications.
In practice,\n however, the system proposed by the Decision proved cumbersome and\n implementation at best partial. The Commission and Member States concentrated initially on the occupational qualifications of skilled workers. As a first\n step, 219 VET qualifications in 19 sectors were designated (the 19 sectors\n were chosen to reflect occupations whose workers were most likely to move to\n other countries). However, the process of recording, describing and comparing\n qualifications had proven slow and unwieldy. Moreover, the Decision proved\n too inflexible to adapt to changing needs and the Commission and Member\n States came to accept that the centralised approach set out in Decision\n 85/368/ECC, and the constant and rapid evolution of qualifications, soon made\n the published information out of date and the system, as a whole, almost\n impossible to apply.
For all these\n reasons, implementation of the activities specified in the Decision was soon\n abandoned. Its application is therefore rendered useless given the recently\n adopted initiatives taken at EU or inter-governmental level to increase\n transparency, support transfer and facilitate the valuing of learning\n outcomes (in particular, the European Qualifications Network [see COD/2006/0163],\n which seeks to replicate the broad objective of the 1985 Decision, in aiming\n to facilitate the comparison of qualifications and thereby the mobility of\n workers).
CONTENT: the\n only objective of the Decision is therefore to repeal Council Decision\n 85/368/EEC on the comparability of vocational training qualifications between\n Member States, under the Commission's programme to simplify legislation.
The repeal of\n this text is consistent with the Lisbon agenda, in particular the Better\n Regulation strategy and the need to simplify the regulatory environment for\n business and other stakeholders.
ENTRY INTO\n FORCE: 19 November 2008.
\n