{"change_dates":[],"dossier":{"amendments":[],"changes":{"2014-11-10T00:53:56":[{"data":[{"body":"EC","commission":[{"Commissioner":"DE GUCHT Karel","DG":{"title":"Trade","url":"http://ec.europa.eu/trade/"}}],"date":"2008-03-18T00:00:00","docs":[{"celexid":"CELEX:52008PC0156:EN","text":["
were included in the list of countries in Annex 1 of the EPA Market Access Regulation adopted by Council on 20 December 2007 that have benefited from the Community market access offer made in the context of EPAs from 1 January 2008. Their inclusion on this list will become permanent following ratification of the EPA by all parties. This will ensure a single harmonised trade regime with the EU providing improved market access for all CARIFORUM States, including Haiti which is recognised as a Least Developed Country by the United Nations.
Free Trade Area and other areas of cooperation: the Caribbean EPA is the first comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement to be concluded. It includes all the measures necessary to establish a Free Trade Area compatible with the provisions of Article XXIV of the GATT 1994. It also includes a Title on Services, Investment and E-commerce and the related schedules of commitments, which are compatible with the provisions of Article V of the GATS (General Agreement on Trade in Services).
The EPA also contains provisions on Customs and Trade Facilitation, Technical Barriers to Trade, Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, Agriculture and Fisheries, Current Payment and Capital Movements, Competition, Innovation and Intellectual Property, transparency in Public Procurement, dialogue on finance issues, transparency and best practices in the area of tax policy, as well as Environmental and Social Aspects. Sustainable development is further promoted through the involvement of civil society and parliamentarians in joint committees, and special consultation mechanisms.
Development Cooperation provisions: there are also Development Cooperation provisions setting out priority areas of action for the implementation of the EPA. Each individual substantive chapter of the Agreement includes specific areas of cooperation and a Development Cooperation declaration establishes the link with the EU Aid for Trade strategy and recalls the Commission's and Member States' intention to contribute to a regional development fund.
Institutional and monitoring provisions: the institutional provisions include a Joint CARIFORUM-EC Council (\"Joint Council\") to supervise the implementation of the EPA. The Joint Council shall be composed of representatives of the CARIFORUM States as well as members of the Council and of the Commission. The Joint Council will be assisted by a CARIFORUM-EC Trade and Development Committee.
The EPA includes provision to establish comprehensive monitoring of the impact of the EPA. This will be supported by the provision for a CARIFORUM-EC Parliamentary Committee to provide a forum for members of the European Parliament and the CARIFORUM States legislatures. A CARIFORUM-EC Consultative Committee will furthermore assist the Joint Council to promote dialogue and cooperation between civil society representatives.
Provisional application: pending the entry into force of the EPA, the Agreement foresees the provisional application of the Agreement.
It should also be noted that the European Parliament will be called upon to give its assent to the conclusion of the EPA.
\n\t\t \t\t\t\t\t\t
This proposal\n for a Decision is the legal basis for the conclusion of the Economic\n Partnership Agreement between the CARIFORUM States, on the one hand, and the European\n Community and its Member States, on the other.
Recall that\n the CARIFORUM States are as follows:
The content of\n the agreement is, in essence, consistent with the Commission’s initial\n proposal (for details, please refer to the summary of the Commission’s\n initial proposal dated 18 March 2008).
The agreement\n was initialled on 16 December 2007 and has been provisionally applied\n since 29 December 2008 pending its entry into force.
Pursuant to\n Article 243(4) of the Agreement, certain elements of the Agreement have been applied\n on the basis of Council Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 applying the\n arrangements for products originating in certain states which are part of the\n African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Group of States provided for in\n agreements establishing, or leading to the establishment of, Economic\n Partnership Agreements. The Agreement shall not seek to affect the rights of\n investors of the Member States of the European Union to benefit from any more\n favourable treatment provided for in any agreement related to investment to\n which a Member State and a CARIFORUM State are Parties. Member States may\n maintain and conclude such agreements in so far as they comply with Community\n law.
The text of the\n Agreement is attached to the proposal for a Decision and appears in Council\n doc. 7507/08. To enter into force, the Agreement requires the assent\n of the European Parliament.
\nThe Committee\n on International Trade adopted the report drawn up by David MARTIN (PES, UK)\n recommending that the European Parliament give its assent to the conclusion\n of the Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its\n Member States, of the one part, and the CARIFORUM States, on the other part.
MEPs draw\n attention to a certain number of issues on which they would like to receive a\n firm commitment from the Commission and the Council. Among these issues, MEPs\n insist on a mandatory comprehensive review of the Agreement to be\n undertaken not later than five years after the date of signature and\n at subsequent five-yearly intervals, in order to determine the impact of the\n Agreement, including the costs and consequences of implementation.
They also call\n for : (i) an independent monitoring mechanism to be established within the\n CARIFORUM States endowed with the necessary resources to undertake the\n analysis necessary to determining the extent to which the EPA is achieving\n its objectives; (ii) clarifications on which funds are additional to the\n funding of the 10th EDF; (iii) the funds provided for an equitable share of\n the Aid for Trade resources to be considered as additional resources and not\n merely repackaging of EDF funding and their disbursement to be timely, predictable\n and in harmony with the execution schedules of national and regional\n strategic development plans; (iv) provisions regarding enforcement of\n intellectual property rights not be used to thwart legitimate competition\n from generic pharmaceutical suppliers, and/or to inhibit government\n purchasing entities from acquiring generic supplies.
Lastly, MEPs\n call on the European Union to apply the most favoured nation principle (MFN)\n among all the ACP sub-regional groups of the ACP countries. They also call\n for the elimination of the application of MFN treatment to the European Union\n by CARIFORUM and other sub-regional groups.
\nThe European\n Parliament adopted by 460 votes to 82, with 43 abstentions, a legislative\n resolution and gave its assent to the conclusion of the Economic Partnership\n Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one\n part, and the CARIFORUM States, on the other part.
It should be\n noted that this legislative resolution is linked to a joint resolution on the\n conclusion of the stepping stone Economic Partnership Agreement EC-CARIFORUM\n (see RSP/2008/2671)\n which was adopted on the same day.
\nThe Lisbon\n Treaty, which entered into force on 1 December 2009, amended the EU's two\n core treaties, the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the Treaty establishing\n the European Community (EC Treaty). The latter was renamed the Treaty on the Functioning\n of the European Union (TFEU).
These changes\n had various consequences for many ongoing procedures. First of all, the\n articles of the TEU and of the old EC Treaty that constitute the legal basis\n of all the proposals founded on those Treaties were renumbered in\n accordance with the table of equivalences mentioned in Article 5 of the\n Lisbon Treaty.
In addition,\n some proposals underwent a change to their legal basis going beyond a mere\n change to their numbering, and this resulted in changes to the type of\n procedure.
The Lisbon\n Treaty also introduced new concepts of decision-making procedure. The\n old \"codecision procedure\" was extended to new areas and renamed\n the \"ordinary legislative procedure\". A new \"consent\n procedure\" replaced the old \"assent procedure\". New\n interinstitutional procedures were also set up for the adoption of certain\n non-legislative acts, for example the conclusion of some international\n agreements.
The ongoing\n proposals concerned by these changes were formally modified by the Commission\n in a Communication published on 2 December 2009 (COM(2009)0665).
In the case of\n the proposal for a Council Decision concluding the Economic Partnership Agreement\n between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and\n the CARIFORUM States, on the other part, the entry into force of the\n Lisbon Treaty had the following impacts:
· \n the old legal basis – Treaty/EC/Art.57(2), Art. 133(1) and (5), Art.181, Art.300 (3)\n first and 2nd paras. - became Art 64(2), Art.207 (4) first para, Art.\n 211, Art 218 (6)(a) of the TFEU. Please note that the numbering of the old\n legal basis corresponds to the consolidated version of the Treaty that was\n applicable immediately before the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, and\n may differ from the references in the original Commission proposal;
· \n the proposal, which had previously fallen\n under the old assent procedure (AVC), was classified as an interinstitutional\n non-legislative procedure (NLE).
\nwere included in the list of countries in Annex 1 of the EPA Market Access Regulation adopted by Council on 20 December 2007 that have benefited from the Community market access offer made in the context of EPAs from 1 January 2008. Their inclusion on this list will become permanent following ratification of the EPA by all parties. This will ensure a single harmonised trade regime with the EU providing improved market access for all CARIFORUM States, including Haiti which is recognised as a Least Developed Country by the United Nations.
Free Trade Area and other areas of cooperation: the Caribbean EPA is the first comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement to be concluded. It includes all the measures necessary to establish a Free Trade Area compatible with the provisions of Article XXIV of the GATT 1994. It also includes a Title on Services, Investment and E-commerce and the related schedules of commitments, which are compatible with the provisions of Article V of the GATS (General Agreement on Trade in Services).
The EPA also contains provisions on Customs and Trade Facilitation, Technical Barriers to Trade, Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, Agriculture and Fisheries, Current Payment and Capital Movements, Competition, Innovation and Intellectual Property, transparency in Public Procurement, dialogue on finance issues, transparency and best practices in the area of tax policy, as well as Environmental and Social Aspects. Sustainable development is further promoted through the involvement of civil society and parliamentarians in joint committees, and special consultation mechanisms.
Development Cooperation provisions: there are also Development Cooperation provisions setting out priority areas of action for the implementation of the EPA. Each individual substantive chapter of the Agreement includes specific areas of cooperation and a Development Cooperation declaration establishes the link with the EU Aid for Trade strategy and recalls the Commission's and Member States' intention to contribute to a regional development fund.
Institutional and monitoring provisions: the institutional provisions include a Joint CARIFORUM-EC Council (\"Joint Council\") to supervise the implementation of the EPA. The Joint Council shall be composed of representatives of the CARIFORUM States as well as members of the Council and of the Commission. The Joint Council will be assisted by a CARIFORUM-EC Trade and Development Committee.
The EPA includes provision to establish comprehensive monitoring of the impact of the EPA. This will be supported by the provision for a CARIFORUM-EC Parliamentary Committee to provide a forum for members of the European Parliament and the CARIFORUM States legislatures. A CARIFORUM-EC Consultative Committee will furthermore assist the Joint Council to promote dialogue and cooperation between civil society representatives.
Provisional application: pending the entry into force of the EPA, the Agreement foresees the provisional application of the Agreement.
It should also be noted that the European Parliament will be called upon to give its assent to the conclusion of the EPA.
\n\t\t \t\t\t\t\t\t
This proposal\n for a Decision is the legal basis for the conclusion of the Economic\n Partnership Agreement between the CARIFORUM States, on the one hand, and the European\n Community and its Member States, on the other.
Recall that\n the CARIFORUM States are as follows:
The content of\n the agreement is, in essence, consistent with the Commission’s initial\n proposal (for details, please refer to the summary of the Commission’s\n initial proposal dated 18 March 2008).
The agreement\n was initialled on 16 December 2007 and has been provisionally applied\n since 29 December 2008 pending its entry into force.
Pursuant to\n Article 243(4) of the Agreement, certain elements of the Agreement have been applied\n on the basis of Council Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 applying the\n arrangements for products originating in certain states which are part of the\n African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Group of States provided for in\n agreements establishing, or leading to the establishment of, Economic\n Partnership Agreements. The Agreement shall not seek to affect the rights of\n investors of the Member States of the European Union to benefit from any more\n favourable treatment provided for in any agreement related to investment to\n which a Member State and a CARIFORUM State are Parties. Member States may\n maintain and conclude such agreements in so far as they comply with Community\n law.
The text of the\n Agreement is attached to the proposal for a Decision and appears in Council\n doc. 7507/08. To enter into force, the Agreement requires the assent\n of the European Parliament.
\nThe Committee\n on International Trade adopted the report drawn up by David MARTIN (PES, UK)\n recommending that the European Parliament give its assent to the conclusion\n of the Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Community and its\n Member States, of the one part, and the CARIFORUM States, on the other part.
MEPs draw\n attention to a certain number of issues on which they would like to receive a\n firm commitment from the Commission and the Council. Among these issues, MEPs\n insist on a mandatory comprehensive review of the Agreement to be\n undertaken not later than five years after the date of signature and\n at subsequent five-yearly intervals, in order to determine the impact of the\n Agreement, including the costs and consequences of implementation.
They also call\n for : (i) an independent monitoring mechanism to be established within the\n CARIFORUM States endowed with the necessary resources to undertake the\n analysis necessary to determining the extent to which the EPA is achieving\n its objectives; (ii) clarifications on which funds are additional to the\n funding of the 10th EDF; (iii) the funds provided for an equitable share of\n the Aid for Trade resources to be considered as additional resources and not\n merely repackaging of EDF funding and their disbursement to be timely, predictable\n and in harmony with the execution schedules of national and regional\n strategic development plans; (iv) provisions regarding enforcement of\n intellectual property rights not be used to thwart legitimate competition\n from generic pharmaceutical suppliers, and/or to inhibit government\n purchasing entities from acquiring generic supplies.
Lastly, MEPs\n call on the European Union to apply the most favoured nation principle (MFN)\n among all the ACP sub-regional groups of the ACP countries. They also call\n for the elimination of the application of MFN treatment to the European Union\n by CARIFORUM and other sub-regional groups.
\nThe European\n Parliament adopted by 460 votes to 82, with 43 abstentions, a legislative\n resolution and gave its assent to the conclusion of the Economic Partnership\n Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one\n part, and the CARIFORUM States, on the other part.
It should be\n noted that this legislative resolution is linked to a joint resolution on the\n conclusion of the stepping stone Economic Partnership Agreement EC-CARIFORUM\n (see RSP/2008/2671)\n which was adopted on the same day.
\nThe Lisbon\n Treaty, which entered into force on 1 December 2009, amended the EU's two\n core treaties, the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the Treaty establishing\n the European Community (EC Treaty). The latter was renamed the Treaty on the Functioning\n of the European Union (TFEU).
These changes\n had various consequences for many ongoing procedures. First of all, the\n articles of the TEU and of the old EC Treaty that constitute the legal basis\n of all the proposals founded on those Treaties were renumbered in\n accordance with the table of equivalences mentioned in Article 5 of the\n Lisbon Treaty.
In addition,\n some proposals underwent a change to their legal basis going beyond a mere\n change to their numbering, and this resulted in changes to the type of\n procedure.
The Lisbon\n Treaty also introduced new concepts of decision-making procedure. The\n old \"codecision procedure\" was extended to new areas and renamed\n the \"ordinary legislative procedure\". A new \"consent\n procedure\" replaced the old \"assent procedure\". New\n interinstitutional procedures were also set up for the adoption of certain\n non-legislative acts, for example the conclusion of some international\n agreements.
The ongoing\n proposals concerned by these changes were formally modified by the Commission\n in a Communication published on 2 December 2009 (COM(2009)0665).
In the case of\n the proposal for a Council Decision concluding the Economic Partnership Agreement\n between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and\n the CARIFORUM States, on the other part, the entry into force of the\n Lisbon Treaty had the following impacts:
· \n the old legal basis – Treaty/EC/Art.57(2), Art. 133(1) and (5), Art.181, Art.300 (3)\n first and 2nd paras. - became Art 64(2), Art.207 (4) first para, Art.\n 211, Art 218 (6)(a) of the TFEU. Please note that the numbering of the old\n legal basis corresponds to the consolidated version of the Treaty that was\n applicable immediately before the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, and\n may differ from the references in the original Commission proposal;
· \n the proposal, which had previously fallen\n under the old assent procedure (AVC), was classified as an interinstitutional\n non-legislative procedure (NLE).
\n