Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Opinion | AFET | DE KEYSER Véronique (S&D) | |
Lead | INTA | MOREIRA Vital (S&D) | ANDRIKIENĖ Laima Liucija (PPE), SCHAAKE Marietje (ALDE), JADOT Yannick (Verts/ALE), ZAHRADIL Jan (ECR), SCHOLZ Helmut (GUE/NGL) |
Opinion | ITRE |
Legal Basis TFEU 207, TFEU 218-p6a
Activites
- 2013/01/04 Final act published in Official Journal
- #3200
-
2012/11/20
Council Meeting
-
2012/11/20
End of procedure in Parliament
-
2012/11/20
Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
-
2012/10/23
Results of vote in Parliament
- Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament
-
T7-0385/2012
summary
The European Parliament adopted a legislative resolution on the draft Council Decision on the conclusion of a Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part, on Conformity Assessment and Acceptance of Industrial Products (CAA). Parliament gave its consent to the conclusion of the Protocol by 379 votes to 230, with 41 abstentions and in spite of its fundamental reservations on Israeli policy with respect to the Palestinians. To recap, the EU-Israel Agreement on the mutual recognition of pharmaceutical certificates will remove technical barriers to trade, cut manufacturers’ costs and enable them to get their products to market faster. This Agreement will apply to all pharmaceuticals except for advanced therapy products based on tissues and cells of human origin and medicinal products that include blood products. However, Parliament had feared that its consent to this Agreement would send the wrong political message to Israel at a time when Members condemn its policy in regard to Palestinians. It recalls that Members tables an Oral Question O-000129/2012 to Commissioner De GUCHT asking for the scope of the territorial competence of the Israeli Responsible Authority to be defined in respect of the Protocol. At the plenary session of 3 July 2012, the Commission clarified all the concerns of the parliamentary committees. As a result, Parliament gives its consent to the Protocol but calls on the Commission to provide it with regular reports on the progress of the Protocol’s implementation.
-
2012/09/26
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
-
A7-0289/2012
summary
The Committee on International Trade adopted the recommendation by Vital MOREIRA (S&D, PT) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a Protocol to the Euro Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part, on Conformity Assessment and Acceptance of Industrial Products (CAA). Members recall that an Oral Question O-000129/2012 was tabled by the Committee on International Trade and the Committee on Foreign Affairs whereby the Commissioner was asked to define the scope of the territorial competence of the Israeli Responsible Authority in connection to the Protocol. In view of the replies given by Commissioner De Gucht in Plenary Session on 3 July 2012, in which the Commission clarified all the concerns of the Committee on International Trade and the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the committee recommends that the European Parliament consent to conclusion of the Protocol. Members also call on the Commission to regularly report to the Parliament on any progress in the implementation of the Protocol.
-
A7-0289/2012
summary
-
2012/09/18
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
-
2012/07/19
Legislative proposal published
-
12428/2012
summary
PURPOSE: to conclude a Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Association Agreement between the EU-Israel on Conformity Assessment and Acceptance of Industrial Products (ACAA). PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision. BACKGROUND: the Euro-Mediterranean Association Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part came into force on 20 November 1995. Article 47 of the Association Agreement provides, where appropriate, for the conclusion of a European conformity assessment agreement, and Article 55 of the same Agreement provides for the use of best endeavours to approximate the laws of the Parties. In this context, a Protocol to the Association on Conformity Assessment and Acceptance of Industrial Products was signed on behalf of the European Union on 6 May 2010. This Protocol should be approved on behalf of the European Union. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was undertaken. LEGAL BASIS: Article 207 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a)(v) and Article 218(7) thereof. CONTENT: by means of this Decision, it is proposed to conclude a Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Association Agreement between the EU and Israel on Conformity Assessment and Acceptance of Industrial Products (ACAA) on behalf of the European Union. The draft protocol is identical to the proposal that dates from 22/10/2009. For further information on the detailed content of the protocol, please refer to the summary of the initial proposal of October 2009. Overall, the Protocole seeks to facilitate the market access of each of the partners by eliminating technical barriers to trade in industrial products. To this end, provision is made in the Protocol for two mechanisms of mutual recognition and mutual acceptance of the products of the partners. The recognition mechanism is set in place involving: safeguard clauses for sensitive products; a dispute settlement procedure for resolving any problem between the two parties regarding recognition; and an information exchange mechnism to facilitate the recognition of the industrial products covered by the Protocol. Management of the agreement and notification procedure: the Commission shall be responsible for the external representation of the Union for what concerns the Protocol, including the tasks of information and notification, as well as for providing responses to requests in accordance with the Annexes to the Protocol. The Protocol shall be implemented on the basis of the EU legislation applicable to accreditation, market surveillance and commercialisation of products. The Commission shall be empowered to make technical amendments to the Protocol. BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: the proposal has no implication for the European Union budget.
- DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/trade/', 'title': 'Trade'}, DE GUCHT Karel
-
12428/2012
summary
-
2010/06/15
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
- #3005
-
2010/03/22
Council Meeting
-
2010/02/10
Initial legislative proposal published
-
05190/2010
summary
PURPOSE: to conclude a Protocol to the Euro Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel of the other part, on Conformity Assessment and Acceptance of Industrial Products (CAA).PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.LEGAL BASE: Articles 207 and 218(6)(a)v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was carried out.BACKGROUND: the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel of the other part entered into force on 20 November 1995. Article 47 of the Association Agreement provides, where appropriate, for the conclusion of a European conformity assessment agreement, and Article 55 of the same Agreement provides for the use of best endeavours to approximate the laws of the Parties. CONTENT: the proposed decision aims to conclude, on behalf of the European Union, the Protocol to the Euro Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel of the other part, on Conformity Assessment and Acceptance of Industrial Products.For further details on the content of this Protocol, please refer to the summary of the former initial proposal of 22/10/2009.An EU-Israel consultation procedure is provided for in the proposal in order to strengthen relations between the parties. This procedure aims to: carry into effect the information, co-operation, notification, amendment, verification and management functions provided for the Protocol; carry into effect the information, co-operation, notification, amendment, verification and management functions provided for in the Annexes to the Protocol;if necessary, reply to requests in accordance with the Annexes to the Protocol.BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: the proposal has no implications for the Union’s budget.
- DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/trade/', 'title': 'Trade'}, DE GUCHT Karel
-
05190/2010
summary
-
2009/12/02
Additional information
-
2009/10/22
Initial legislative proposal published
-
COM(2009)0559
summary
PURPOSE: to conclude an additional Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Association Agreement between the EU-Israel on Conformity Assessment and Acceptance of Industrial Products (ACAA).PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.BACKGROUND: this Agreement is presented as a Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part, signed on 20 November 1995 rather than as a stand alone Agreement.The Protocol will allow Community exporters, if they so choose, to test and certify their industrial products to the same (aligned) requirements prior to export, and then access that market without any further conformity assessment requirements. The certification procedures will only need to be carried out one time for both markets and against the same aligned requirements or standards. The recognition of certification will permit savings and stimulate exports.LEGAL BASIS: Article 133 in conjunction the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) of the Treaty establishing the European Community.CONTENT: the Commission proposes that the Council adopts this proposal for a decision to conclude the ACAA with Israel. General principles of the Agreement: the ACAA facilitates market access by eliminating technical barriers to trade with respect to industrial products. To this end, the ACAA provides for two mechanisms:under the first mechanism, mutual recognition of products operates on the basis of the acquis communautaire that has been transposed by the partner country, in the same way as it would apply to products placed on the market of a Member State. It allows industrial products covered by it and attested as compliant according to the procedures of the European Union to be placed on the Israeli market without having to undergo any further approval procedures, and vice versa. At present one sector is included: good manufacturing practice (GMP) for pharmaceutical products. Israel has taken over the Community technical legislation in the sector covered by the Annex to the Protocol and participates in the European organisations in the sector covered by it;the second mechanism, i.e., the mutual acceptance of industrial products not commonly regulated, confirms that Articles 16 and 17 of the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement with Israel apply without other restriction in the product sectors covered by it. That is, Annexes applying this mechanism will provide that where no European technical regulations exist, industrial products listed under such Annexes lawfully traded in the market of either Party (i.e., on the territory of Israel or that of one of the Member States of the EU) may be lawfully traded in the other. No annexes making this mechanism operational are at present included.Main provisions of the Framework Agreement:Purpose and means: the ACAA aims to eliminate technical barriers to trade in respect to industrial products. The ACAA provides for two mechanisms, as described above.Alignment of legislation: Israel has a commitment to take appropriate measures to take over and maintain measures to align with and maintain Community law, as it applies to products covered by the Agreement. For New Approach sectors (which will be explicitly identified as such in the Annexes that relate to them) there is also an obligation on Israel to maintain relevant transposed standards, in the same way as a Member State of the EU. Infrastructure: Israel is committed to establish and maintain a quality infrastructure equivalent to that of the EU for sectors covered by the Protocol.Mutual acceptance of industrial products: the principles of the two mechanisms underlying the mutual acceptance of products onto the market of the other Party, as described above, are detailed in this Agreement. There is also a provision that, unless otherwise agreed, the ACAA does not entail any obligation, for one Party, to accept product attested as compliant by bodies other than those of the Parties.Safeguard clause: each Party has the right to deny market access when that Party is able to demonstrate that a product might endanger legitimate concerns covered by legislation applicable to the products covered by an Annex (mainly to do with safety or public health). The Annexes will provide for the detailed procedures to be used in such cases.Extension of coverage: Parties may modify the scope and coverage of this Protocol through amendment of the Annexes or by the addition of new ones.Obligations of Parties as regards their responsible authorities and notified bodies: Parties are obliged to ensure that their responsible authorities monitor the technical competence and compliance of their respective notified bodies and have power and expertise for designating, suspending, and withdrawing such bodies. In addition, they are obliged to ensure that their notified bodies comply with the requirements of Community and aligned national law, and maintain their technical competence to carry out the tasks for which they have been notified.Notified bodies: a procedure for the notification of bodies to assess conformity in relation to the legal requirements specified in the corresponding annexes is provided. The procedure is similar to the one applied within the Community. It also sets out the procedure for the withdrawal of notified bodies.Verification of notified bodies: each Party has the right to request a verification of a body notified by the other Party. The verification may be done either by the authorities which have designated the body or together by the authorities of both Parties. The notified body would be suspended until a final decision is taken.Exchange of information: measures are provided as regards the transparency provision. This provision ensures uniform application and interpretation of the Protocol. It also provides for the Parties to encourage their notified bodies to co-operate to establish mutual recognition agreements in the voluntary sphere.Confidentiality: this standard provision prohibits disclosing information acquired under this Protocol.Management of the Agreement: responsibility for the effective functioning of this Agreement shall be borne by the Committee (subcommittee "Industry, trade and services" - set up and designated for trade purposes under Article 73 of the Association Agreement). Its main tasks shall be to add and amend Annexes, appoint experts for verifications, consider new arrangements, and resolve questions related to the Protocol. Technical co-operation and assistance: measures are provided as regards technical co-operation and assistance with a view to properly implementing this Protocol.Agreements with other countries: the agreement can be extended to other countries by explicit agreement, and encourages - but does not force - Israel to make agreements similar to the Protocol, and covering the same products, that the EU might make with another country.Annexesannex on Mutual Acceptance of Industrial Products: there is one Annex, covering good manufacturing practice (GMP) for pharmaceutical products. It operates by the mechanism described above whereby mutual recognition of products operates on the basis of the acquis communautaire that has been transposed by Israel. Advanced therapy products, special medicinal products based on tissues and cells of human origin, and medicinal products that include blood products shall not be concerned. The inclusion of these fields may be agreed between the Parties if the Israeli legislation governing them is brought into alignment;annexes on Mutual Acceptance of Industrial Products no commonly regulated: no such annexes have been negotiated for the moment. The ACAA provides nevertheless the basis for such acceptance of products.BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: the proposal has no implication for the European Union budget.
- DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/trade/', 'title': 'Trade'}, DE GUCHT Karel
-
COM(2009)0559
summary
Documents
- Initial legislative proposal published: COM(2009)0559
- Initial legislative proposal published: 05190/2010
- Legislative proposal published: 12428/2012
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0289/2012
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T7-0385/2012
- : Decision 2013/1
- : OJ L 001 04.01.2013, p. 0001
Amendments | Dossier |
32 |
2009/0155(NLE)
2012/04/11
AFET
6 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion last paragraph The Committee on Foreign Affairs
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion last paragraph The Committee on Foreign Affairs
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion last paragraph The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on International Trade, as the committee responsible, to
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion last paragraph The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on International Trade, as the committee responsible, to
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion last paragraph The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on International Trade, as the committee responsible, to
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion last paragraph The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on International Trade, as the committee responsible, to
source: PE-486.181
2012/07/17
INTA
26 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a recommendation Citation 1 a new – having regard to the Euro- Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part,("the Association Agreement"), which entered into force on 20 November 1995;
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital D a (new) Da. Whereas the CAA is a trade agreement that seeks to eliminate technical barriers to trade in industrial products;
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital D a (new) Da. Whereas the European Parliament, in its resolution of the 29th September 2011, stressed again that peaceful and non- violent means are the only way to achieve a sustainable solution to the Israeli- Palestinian conflict;
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital D b (new) Db. Whereas any means aimed at holding this trade-related Protocol hostage to subjective and over-politicised views could undermine the achievement of a sustainable solution to the Israeli- Palestinian conflict;
Amendment 13 #
E. Whereas the enhancing of the trade partnership between the EU and Israel that would result from the application of the Protocol would
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital E E. Whereas the enhancing of the trade partnership between the EU and Israel that would result from the application of the Protocol would
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital E a (new) Ea. Whereas under the mutual recognition mechanism, Israel has transposed the relevant EU acquis, with respect to good manufacturing practice (GMP) for pharmaceutical products into its own legislation, and Israel has participated in the relevant European organisations in this sector;
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital F Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital F Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital F a (new) Fa. Whereas the Protocol does not affect the EU’s established policy that products manufactured in post-1967 territories of the State of Israel cannot benefit from preferential treatment under the Association Agreement;
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital G Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a recommendation Citation 3 a new - having regard to the Oral Question O- 000129/2012 tabled by INTA and AFET Committees whereby the Commissioner was asked to define the scope of the territorial competence of the Israeli Responsible Authority;
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital G Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital H Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital H Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a recommendation Paragraph 1 a new 1a. Calls on the Commission to regularly report to the Parliament on any progress in the implementation of the Protocol;
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a recommendation Citation 3 b new - having regard to the replies to the Oral Question given by Commissioner De Gucht in Plenary Session on 3 July 2012 where the Commission clarified all the concerns of INTA and AFET Committees,
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital A A. Whereas
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital A a (new) Aa. Whereas the trading partnership between the Union and Israel is mutually beneficial, the Union being Israel’s major source of imports and its second largest market for exports behind the United States;
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital A b (new) Ab. Whereas the Union and Israel, in conformity with their membership in the World Trade Organization, have set up a strategic framework for cooperation under the European Neighbourhood Policy Instrument over the period 2007- 2013 to develop amongst other things, trade and investment flows and regulatory approximation;
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital B Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital C C. Whereas the
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a recommendation Recital D source: PE-494.507
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0559/COM_COM(2009)0559_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0559/COM_COM(2009)0559_EN.pdf |
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|