Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Opinion | ENVI | ROSBACH Anna (EFD) | |
Lead | ITRE | EK Lena (ALDE) | VAN NISTELROOIJ Lambert (PPE), GIEREK Adam (S&D), HASSI Satu (Verts/ALE), GRÓBARCZYK Marek Józef (ECR) |
Legal Basis TFEU 185, TFEU 188-p2
Activites
- 2010/09/30 Final act published in Official Journal
-
2010/09/22
Final act signed
-
2010/09/22
End of procedure in Parliament
- #3026
-
2010/07/12
Council Meeting
-
2010/07/12
Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
-
2010/06/16
Results of vote in Parliament
- Results of vote in Parliament
-
T7-0212/2010
summary
The European Parliament adopted by 630 votes to 14, with 6 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on participation by the Community in a Joint Baltic Sea Research and Development Programme (BONUS-169) undertaken by several Member States. It adopted its position at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure (formerly known as the codecision procedure). The amendments adopted in plenary are a result of a compromise reached between the European Parliament and the Council. They amend the Commission proposal as follows:Implementation of BONUS: according to the amended text, the strategic phase of the Programme shall last up to 18 months. Parliament stressed the need to encourage an adequate participation of SME. They also state that the grant and payment of financing to participants in BONUS shall comply with common rules in line with the Seventh Framework Programme. Projects shall be selected according to the principles of equal treatment, transparency, independent evaluation, co-financing, no-profit, financing not cumulated with other Union sources, as well as the principle of non-retroactivity. Conditions for the Union contribution: Parliament added here that the Union financial contribution for the implementation phase shall be conditional upon, inter alia, the establishment by the participating Member States of the Strategic Research Agenda, Stakeholders Consultation Platforms and the implementation modalities referred to in the text as well as the progress made towards the achievement of objectives and deliverables set out in Annex I, section 2 (strategic Phase.) The Commission may, if appropriate, make recommendations for improving the Strategic Research Agenda. Evaluation: in the light of an interim evaluation conducted by the Commission, assisted by independent experts with a good knowledge of the local conditions, the Commission should assess the quality and efficiency of the implementation of BONUS and progress towards the objectives set, as well as conduct a final evaluation.Annexes: it is stipulated that the BONUS EEIG shall be the recipient and administrator of the Union contribution. A Participating State may decide to administer its own national funding and to devote its cash contribution exclusively to domestic research that is selected at central level or to have its cash contribution administered centrally by the BONUS EEIG.
- 2010/06/15 Debate in Parliament
- #3016
-
2010/05/25
Council Meeting
-
3016
summary
The Council took note of a presidency progress report (9423/10) on a decision aimed at approving Community participation in a research project in the Baltic Sea ("BONUS-169 programme") undertaken by several EU countries.BONUS-169 is a joint research programme undertaken by eight EU Baltic Sea Member States (Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Sweden) in support of sustainable development of the Baltic Sea region. Its main objective is to provide an effective response to key challenges in the region in relation to environmental protection and sustainable development, tourism, aquaculture, food safety, maritime transport and socio-economic issues. A first reading agreement with the European Parliament is expected to be confirmed after the vote at the EP plenary assembly in mid-June, thus allowing the EU to contribute up to EUR 50 million for the whole duration of the project.BONUS-169, which is in line with the objectives of the European strategy for maritime research and the Union's strategy for the Baltic Sea region, is to be considered as a pilot case for other similar regional initiatives.
-
3016
summary
- 2010/05/19 Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
-
2010/05/11
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
- #2982
-
2009/12/03
Council Meeting
-
2982
summary
The Commission made a brief presentation on the proposal for combating the negative impact of pollution, climate change, acidification, overexploitation and biodiversity loss in the Baltic Sea by means of a joint research and development project (the "BONUS-169" programme) undertaken by EU Baltic Sea countries.
-
2982
summary
-
2009/11/12
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
2009/10/29
Legislative proposal published
-
COM(2009)0610
summary
PURPOSE: to allow the Community’s participation in a Joint Baltic Sea Research and Development Programme (BONUS-169) undertaken by several Member States.PROPOSED ACT: Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council.BACKGROUND: the Baltic Sea ecosystem is seriously impacted by many natural and human-induced pressures. The sea and coasts are particularly affected by combined and increasing negative impacts from pollution, eutrophication, climate change, acidification, invasive alien species, overexploitation of living resources and loss of biodiversity.Although many research activities are taking place in the Baltic Sea region, these efforts remain, to a large degree, uncoordinated and lack a jointly agreed regional action plan.Given the limited research possibilities available at national, regional or local level to individually meet the complex environmental challenges of the Baltic Sea region as a whole, action at Community level in the Baltic Sea region is urgently called for.To respond to this, the Commission is presenting this proposal on the participation of the Community in a joint research and development programme for the Baltic (BONUS-169) to be undertaken by several Member States. By bringing together all 8 EU Baltic Sea Member States, this initiative aims to achieve sustainable coordination and cooperation among their research policies and scientific communities in tackling common European challenges and thus to make a significant contribution to the structuring of the European Research Area (ERA) in the Baltic Sea Region by removing barriers between nationally funded research programmes.IMPACT ASSESSMENT: three policy options have been considered for meeting the general and specific objectives of the initiative. These are:Policy option 1: continuation of policies so far developed under FP 7 (“business as usual”);Policy option 2: recourse to regionally-oriented trans-thematic call(s) under the Framework Programme;Policy option 3: recourse to Article 169 with three alternative approaches (A, B and C) varying in the extent and depth of the strategic orientation and the stakeholder involvement in the streamlining and implementation of the calls for proposalsPolicy option 3 through approach A– recourse to Article 169 with a focus limited to marine research and with the immediate launching of science-driven calls for proposals,Policy option 3 through approach B– recourse to Article 169 with a focus broadened to include the Baltic Sea drainage basin and with a strategic vision and roadmap to be developed prior to the start of the initiative and Commission proposal, Policy option 3 through approach C – recourse to Article 169 with a focus broadened to include the Baltic Sea drainage basin and with a strategic vision and roadmap developed during the first phase of the initiative.Policy option 3 through approach C is the preferred option since it can effectively address the shortcomings identified above by achieving long-lasting and durable integration at Member State, institutional and research community level. The Community contribution would ensure that truly European interest would be reflected in the working programme of the initiative, building upon, but not being limited by, activities addressed at purely national level.CONTENT: the purpose of this proposal is to establish the participation of the Community in a Joint Baltic Sea Research Programme (BONUS-169) undertaken by all eight EU Baltic Sea Member States (Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, and Sweden) in support of the Baltic Sea region’s sustainable development. There will be scope for participation of the Russian Federation in the Joint Research Programme provided that the necessary legal requirements are met. BONUS-169 will provide scientific outputs to facilitate the implementation of ecosystem-based management in the Baltic Sea region and support the development and implementation of 'fit-for-purpose' ecosystem-based regulations, policies and management practices aimed at safeguarding the sustainable use of the ecosystem’s goods and services. BONUS-169 will integrate the national research programmes and activities of the 8 Baltic Sea States into a single joint research programme and support, in particular, the research and environmental objectives of the Baltic Sea Strategy (see COM(2009)0248), the Marine and Maritime Strategy and the Water Framework Directive.In order to reach its objectives, BONUS-169 will be implemented in two distinct phases: an initial strategic phase, lasting two years, during which appropriate consultation platforms for active stakeholder involvement will be set-up, a strategic research agenda prepared, and precise implementation modalities will be further broadened and developed; an implementation phase, of minimum 5 years, during which a minimum of three joint calls will be launched in view of funding strategically targeted BONUS-169 projects specifically addressing the objectives of the initiative.Since the future success of BONUS-169 will depend to a large extent upon the achievement of the objectives set out for the strategic phase, the Commission will evaluate the maturity and readiness of the initiative and, provided that the results of the evaluation of are positive, the Commission and the BONUS EEIG shall conclude the implementation agreement. The participating states have agreed that the Baltic Organisations Network for Funding Science, BONUS EEIG, established in Helsinki, Finland, will be the dedicated BONUS-169 implementation structure.BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: the budgetary implications of this horizontal proposal are already mentioned in the legal basis of FP7 as well as in the "Cooperation" Specific Programme of FP7. The agreement to be concluded between the Commission and the dedicated implementation structure shall ensure that the financial interests of the Community are protected. The Community shall make a financial contribution of up to EUR 50 million for all the duration of BONUS-169 shall match the contribution of the participating states, bringing the total expected budget for the initiative to EUR 100 million.The strategic phase will be implemented by a grant according to the rules set out in this Decision and on Regulation (EC) no 1906/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities in actions under the Seventh Framework Programme and for the dissemination of research results (2007-2013). For 2010, the contribution from DG RTD for the strategic phase will amount to EUR 1.25 million (the participating states have to contribute an equivalent amount).The implementation phase will be implemented by indirect centralised management, according to the provisions of Art. 54(2) (c) of the Financial Regulation. According to the Financial Regulation, the Commission will first obtain evidence of the existence and proper operation of, inter-alia, grant-award procedures, an internal control system, an adequate accounting system within the entity to which it entrusts implementation, and an independent external audit.
- DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/research/home.cfm', 'title': 'Research and Innovation'}, GEOGHEGAN-QUINN Máire
-
COM(2009)0610
summary
Documents
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2009)0610
- Debate in Council: 2982
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0164/2010
- Debate in Council: 3016
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T7-0212/2010
- : Decision 2010/862
- : OJ L 256 30.09.2010, p. 0001
Amendments | Dossier |
81 |
2009/0169(COD)
2010/02/26
ENVI
37 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 15 (15) At the end of the strategic phase, the Commission
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 24 (24) In order to efficiently implement BONUS-169, during the implementation phase, financial support should be granted to participants in BONUS-169 projects selected at the central level under the responsibility of the BONUS EEIG following calls for proposals. The grant and payment of such financial support to participants in BONUS-169 should be in accordance with common rules in line with the Seventh Framework Programme.
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 24 (24) In order to efficiently implement BONUS
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 30 (30) It is essential that the research activities carried out under BONUS
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 32 a (new) (32a) The successful implementation of the projects already carried out under the BONUS-169 programme brought to light the disastrous condition of the Baltic Sea, particularly in those places where extensive energy-infrastructure projects are planned; the state of the Baltic Sea environment should therefore continue to be monitored actively.
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 32 b (new) (32b) Flawed practices revealed during the implementation of projects under the BONUS-169 programme should be discontinued, and projects submitted by the research centres of certain Member States should not be unduly favoured when the list of projects to be financed is established, as this would discriminate against other Member States in the Baltic Sea region.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a decision Article - 1 a (new) Article -1a Subject Matter The aim of this Decision is to support the environmentally sustainable development of the Baltic Sea region by facilitating the coordination of regional research efforts with the common goal of implementing an ecosystem-based management of the region.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 - paragraph 3 - introductory part 3. The strategic phase of the Programme shall last up to
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 - paragraph 3 - point a (a) preparation of the Strategic Research agenda – defining the part on scientific content of the programme focusing on calls for proposals, in conformity with the common goal of sustainable ecosystem- based management in the Baltic Sea region and with the objectives set in the Seventh Framework Programme;
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 - paragraph 4 4. The implementation phase shall last for a minimum of five years. During the implementation phase
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 - paragraph 4 4. The implementation phase shall last for a minimum of five years. During the implementation phase at least three calls for proposals shall be published with a view to funding projects which address the objectives of the BONUS-169. These calls shall be targeted at multi-partner and trans- national projects, and include research, technological development, training and dissemination activities. Projects shall be selected according to the principles of equal treatment, transparency, independent evaluation, co-financing, no-profit, financing not cumulated with other Community sources, as well as the principle of non-retroactivity. The grant and payment of financing to participants in BONUS-169 shall comply with common rules in line with the Seventh Framework Programme.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 - paragraph 3 - introductory part 3. The Comm
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 - paragraph 3 - introductory part 3. The Comm
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 - paragraph 3 - point a (a)
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 - paragraph 3 - introductory part and point a 3. The Community financial contribution for the implementation phase shall be
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 - paragraph 3 - point (a) (a)
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 - paragraph 3 - point (b) (b) demonstration by the BONUS EEIG of its capacity to implement BONUS-169 including achieving the objectives of the Baltic Sea region’s environmentally sustainable development, receiving, allocating and monitoring the Community financial contribution under indirect centralised management in accordance with Articles 54(2)(c) and 56 of the Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (hereinafter ‘Financial Regulation’) and Articles 35, 38(2) and 41 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 and in accordance with sound financial management.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 - paragraph 3 - point (e) (e) a commitment by each participating State to contribute its share of the financing to BONUS
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I - section 1 - point g (g) launch
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I - section 1 - point g a (new) (ga) actively invite all third countries bordering the Baltic Sea or providing its drainage basin to join the initiative as a Participating State
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I - section 2.2 - subparagraph 1 The BONUS EEIG shall send to the Commission the deliverables set out in the following paragraphs no later than
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I - section 2.2.1 - subparagraph 1 The Strategic Research Agenda shall be developed and agreed upon in consultation among Participating States, a broad range of stakeholders and the Commission. It shall be the basis for a policy-driven programme. It shall broaden the research focus to embody, in addition to the marine ecosystem, a basin approach that addresses the key issues affecting the quality and productivity of the Baltic Sea Region ecosystems. It shall include an estimate of the economic cost of environmental damages and the loss of biodiversity in the region.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I - section 2.2.3 - point h (h) developing a financing structure of funding BONUS
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I - section 2.2.3 - point h (h) developing a financing structure of funding BONUS
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I - section 3 3. Provided that the
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I - section 3 3.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I - section 3.1 During the implementation phase,
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I - section 3.2 - subparagraph 7 The BONUS EEIG shall establish a funding list strictly in accordance with the results of the independent evaluation and ensuring that projects are selected taking into account as even as possible a distribution between Member States in the Baltic Sea region. The ranking list established by the independent experts shall be considered binding for the allocation of BONUS-169 funds.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I - section 3.4 - subparagraph 2 Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I - section 3.4 - subparagraph 2 The Community financial contribution and the cash contribution of the Participating States to BONUS-169 shall be pooled and administered centrally by the BONUS EEIG, with the possibility for Participating States to devote their cash contributions exclusively to domestic research projects (‘virtual common pot’).
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I - section 3.4 - subparagraph 2 Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a decision Annex II - section 1 1. The BONUS shall be managed by BONUS EEIG through its Secretariat. BONUS EEIG
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a decision Title DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on participation by the Community in a Joint Baltic Sea Research and Development programme (BONUS
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 5 (5) Science
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 11 a (new) (11a) By and large, BONUS ERA-NET and ERA-NET PLUS have worked well and it is thus important to ensure the continuity of the research efforts in order to address the pressing environmental challenges.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 12 (12) While largely focused on environmental research, the BONUS-169 initiative cross-cuts a number of related Community research programmes on a range of human activities having accumulated impacts on the ecosystem such as fisheries, aquaculture, agriculture, infrastructure (particularly in the field of energy), transport, training and mobility of researchers as well as socioeconomic issues. The initiative is of considerable relevance to a number of Community policies and Directives including Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive), the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region, the Common Fisheries Policy, the Common Agricultural Policy, Directive 2000/60/EC of the
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 15 (15) At the end of the strategic phase, the Commission, assisted by independent experts, should
source: PE-439.291
2010/03/05
ITRE
44 amendments...
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 3 (3) The Baltic Sea ecosystem, a semi- enclosed European inland sea, is one of the world’s largest brackish water bodies and
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 15 (15) At the end of the strategic phase, the Commission
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 15 (15) At the end of the strategic phase, the Commission
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 15 (15) At the end of the strategic phase, the Commission
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 15 (15) At the end of the strategic phase, the Commission
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 15 (15) At the end of the strategic phase, the Commission
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 15 (15) At the end of the strategic phase, the Commission
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 15 (15) At the end of the strategic phase, the Commission, assisted by independent expert
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 24 (24) In order to efficiently implement BONUS
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 24 (24) In order to efficiently implement
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 24 (24) In order to efficiently implement BONUS-169, during the implementation phase, financial support should be granted to participants in BONUS-169 projects selected at the central level under the responsibility of the BONUS EEIG following calls for proposals. The grant and payment of such financial support to participants in BONUS-169 should be in accordance with common rules in line with the Seventh Framework Programme.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 28 (28) In line with the objectives of the Seventh Framework Programme, participation by any other countries in BONUS-169, such as the Russian Federation, other countries of the Baltic Sea basin, and Norway, should be possible where such participation is provided for by the relevant international agreement and where both the Commission and the participating Member States agree to it. In accordance with the Seventh Framework Programme, the
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 30 (30) It is essential that the research activities carried out under BONUS-169 conform to basic ethical principles, including those reflected in Article 6 of the Treaty on
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a decision Recital 31 (31)
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. The strategic phase of the Programme shall last up to two years. It shall prepare the implementation phase. Its purpose shall accordingly be to: – determine priority objectives with a view to achieving a good status of the Baltic Sea, – gradually develop the necessary research infrastructure. During the strategic phase, BONUS EEIG shall carry out the following tasks:
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. The strategic phase of the Programme shall last up to
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) preparation of the
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) preparation of
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 4 4. The implementation phase shall last for a minimum of five years. During the implementation phase at least three calls for proposals shall be published with a view to funding projects which address the objectives of the BONUS-169. These calls shall be targeted at multi-partner and trans
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 4 4. The implementation phase shall last for a minimum of five years. During the implementation phase at least three calls for
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 4 4. The implementation phase shall last for a minimum of five years. During the implementation phase at least three calls for proposals shall be published with a view to funding projects which address the objectives of the BONUS-169. These calls shall be targeted at multi-partner and trans
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a decision Article 2 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Small and medium-sized enterprises should receive a minimum allocation of funds (e.g. 15% of the total amount of the Programme) in the open calls published under BONUS.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The Community financial contribution for the implementation phase shall be up to EUR 48.75 million and match, within that limit, the contribution of the Participating States. This ceiling may be increased by any amount remaining after the implementation of the strategic phase. During the implementation phase,
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 3 – introductory part and point a 3. The
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 3 – introductory part and point a 3. The
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 3 – introductory part and point a 3. The
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 3 – introductory part and point a 3. The
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 3 – introductory part and point a 3. The
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. The Comm
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) a positive evaluation of the strategic phase carried out by the Commission with the assistance of independent experts
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a decision Article 3 – paragraph 3 – point a (a)
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a decision Article 9 The Commission and the Court of Auditors shall be entitled to carry out all the checks and inspections necessary to ensure proper management of the Community funds and to protect the Communities’ financial interest against any fraud or irregularity. To this end, the Participating States and the
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a decision Article 11 – paragraph 1 a (new) Particular attention shall be given to Norway.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – section 1 – point g a (new) (ga) urge all third countries bordering the Baltic Sea or providing its drainage basin to join the initiative as a Participating State.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – section 2.2 – paragraph 1 The BONUS EEIG shall send to the Commission the deliverables set out in the following paragraphs no later than 1
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – section 2.2.1 – paragraph 1 The Strategic Research Agenda shall be developed and agreed upon in consultation among Participating States, a broad range of stakeholders and the Commission. It shall be the basis for a policy-driven programme. It shall broaden the research focus to embody, in addition to the marine ecosystem, a basin approach that addresses the key issues affecting the quality and productivity of the Baltic Sea Region ecosystems, in particular eutrophication. It shall include an estimate of the economic cost of environmental damage and the loss of biodiversity in the region.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – section 2.2.3 – point h h) developing a financing structure
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – section 3.4 The implementation phase of BONUS-169 is co-funded by the Participating States and the
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – section 3.4 The implementation phase of BONUS-169 is co-funded by the Participating States and the
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – section 3.4 The implementation phase of BONUS-169 is co-funded by the Participating States and the
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – section 3.4 The implementation phase of BONUS-169 is co-funded by the Participating States and the
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – section 3.4 The implementation phase of BONUS-169 is co-funded by the Participating States and the
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – section 3.4 – paragraph 2 The Community financial contribution and the cash and in kind contributions of the Participating States to the BONUS
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a decision Annex I – section 3.4 – second paragraph source: PE-439.384
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ITRE/7/01485New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32010D0862New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32010D0862 |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2009/0610/COM_COM(2009)0610_FR.pdfNew
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2009&nu_doc=610 |
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities/1/committees/1/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
545fca37d1d1c5177a000000New
4f1ada05b819f207b300004b |
activities/3/committees/1/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
545fca37d1d1c5177a000000New
4f1ada05b819f207b300004b |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
545fca37d1d1c5177a000000New
4f1ada05b819f207b300004b |
committees/1/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
545fca37d1d1c5177a000000New
4f1ada05b819f207b300004b |
procedure/geographical_area/0 |
Old
Baltic Sea AreaNew
Baltic Sea area |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|