2010/0133(COD) | [ParlTrack]

Changes: 2023/08/03docs, links.National_parliaments.url, events, docs.docs.url, 2021/12/18procedure.Modified_legal_basis, events, procedure.instrument, docs.docs.url, docs.docs, docs, events.type, procedure.Other_legal_basis, 2020/01/19docs.body, committees, events.docs.url, docs.docs.url, 2019/07/06council, procedure.instrument, procedure.Modified_legal_basis, procedure.dossier_of_the_committee, events, procedure.final.url, procedure.subject, activities, docs, committees, other, commission, procedure.summary

View current state | View Changes for this date

Procedure completed

2010/0133(COD) Agricultural statistics: permanent crops

Role	Committee	Rapporteur	Shadows
Lead	AGRI	GABRIEL Mariya (PPE)

Lead committee dossier: AGRI/7/03015
Legal Basis TFEU 338-p1

Subjects

Links

Activites

2011/12/30 Final act published in Official Journal
- Regulation 2011/1337
- OJ L 347 30.12.2011, p. 0007
2011/12/13 Final act signed
2011/12/13 End of procedure in Parliament
#3131
2011/12/01 Council Meeting
2011/12/01 Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
2011/11/15 Results of vote in Parliament
- Results of vote in Parliament
- T7-0487/2011 summary
  
  The European Parliament adopted by 610 votes to 15, with 9 abstentions, a resolution in the first reading of the ordinary legislative procedure and amended the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning European statistics on permanent crops. The amendments are the result of a compromise agreement between Parliament and Council. The main amendments to the Commission proposal are as follows: List of permanent crops: the Regulation establishes a common framework for the systematic production of European statistics on the following permanent crops: (i) dessert apple trees; (ii) apple trees for industrial processing (optional); (iii) dessert pear trees ; (iv) pear trees for industrial processing (optional) ; (v) apricot trees; (vi) dessert peach trees; (vii) peach trees for industrial processing (optional); (viii) orange trees; (ix) small citrus fruit trees (optional); (x) lemon trees; (xi) olive trees; (xii) vines intended for the production of table grapes; (xiii) vines intended for other purposes. Coverage: Member States may exclude holdings below a threshold of 0.2 ha of each permanent crop producing entirely or mainly for the market in each Member State. If the area covered by such holdings is less than 5% of the total planted area of the individual crop, Member States may increase that threshold provided that this does not lead to the exclusion of more than an additional 5 % of the total planted area of the individual crop. Data production: save where the option referred to above has been exercised, only Member States with a minimum planted area of 1000 ha of each individual crop shall produce, during 2012 and every five years thereafter, the data referred to in the text. Member States with a minimum planted area of 500 ha of vines for other purposes shall produce, during 2015 and every five years thereafter, the data referred to in Annex II. Delegated acts: in order to take into account economic and technical developments, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts concerning the amendment of: (a) the breakdowns of species by groups, density classes and age classes set out in Annex I, and (b) the variables/characteristics, size classes, degree of specialisation and vine varieties set out in Annex II, except in respect of the optional nature of the required information In exercising this power, the Commission must ensure that the delegated acts do not impose a significant additional administrative burden on the Member States and on the respondents. Regional statistics: data with regard to statistics on permanent crops referred to above save vines for other purposes and further specified in Annex I to this Regulation, shall be broken down by NUTS 1 territorial units, save where a less detailed breakdown is specified in the Regulation. Data with regard to vines for other purposes shall be broken down by NUTS 2 territorial units. Derogation: where the application of the Regulation to the national statistical system of a Member State requires major adaptations and is likely to cause significant practical problems with regard to the permanent, the Commission may adopt implementing acts granting a derogation from its application to that Member State until 31 December 2012. Those Member States benefiting from a derogation shall continue to apply Directive 2001/109/EC. Review: the Commission will review the functioning of the Regulation by 31 December 2018 and every five years thereafter, and shall also assess whether it is necessary to produce all the data referred to in the text. Where the Commission considers that some of those data are no longer required, it shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts that delete certain data from Annexes I and II.
2011/05/06 Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
- A7-0188/2011
2011/05/02 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2010/06/15 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2010/05/21 Legislative proposal published
- COM(2010)0249 summary
  
  PURPOSE: to update the common framework for the systematic production of permanent crop statistics.PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.LEGAL BASE: Article 338(1) on the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. BACKGROUND: Council Regulation (EEC) No 357/79 on statistical surveys of areas under vines and Directive 2001/109/EC concerning the statistical surveys to be carried out by Member States in order to determine the production potential of plantations of certain species of fruit trees provided for the establishment of an information system on the most important permanent crops statistics at European level. These legal acts have helped create national systems for collecting data on the production potential of these crops, from a business perspective and as regards structural characteristics of the production units. However, both users and producers of the data have underlined the need for an update. On the one hand, changes in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and market situation of these products since the existing legislation entered into force have created new or different user needs in terms of variables and breakdowns and more timely data. On the other hand, there is still scope for improving the comparability and completeness of the framework by doing more to harmonise the variables and concepts and to allow Member States more freedom to choose the methods and sources they use, including administrative sources, to collect the basic data needed to produce such statistics.IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the following options were examined:Option 1 (baseline option, i.e. no new EU). If the EU were to take no new action, the comparability and harmonisation of permanent crop statistics across Europe would be weakened and, in a setting where the share of permanent crops is predominant in a big part of EU regions, the opportunities to make efficient use of statistics compiled by partner countries on the basis of common concepts and reporting formats would not be fully exploited. Where permanent crop statistics from official sources are not harmonised or not available, or are only partially available because they are provided voluntarily, other sources must be used (stakeholders and traders' organisations). As a result, the quality of the data might suffer and this might have an adverse impact on policymaking.Option 2 (EU involvement as proposed). The proposed framework for European statistics makes the data more comparable and thus more relevant for users at both European and national level. Additionally, the use of common concepts and reporting formats can help to make the collection and use of permanent crop statistics more efficient.CONTENT: the aim of this proposal is to update, simplify and optimise the existing legal framework for European statistics on permanent crops replacing the existing two legal acts mentioned above by a single one. The proposal revises some variables, greatly simplifying the breakdown of production and regions, and takes into account recent changes in the categories of wines. From a supply side perspective, the proposal responds to changes in user needs, e.g. for data on olive plantations. It also updates the data transmission deadlines.The proposal further simplifies the variables and concepts and significantly adapts the permanent crop statistics to actual user needs by cancelling the annual statistics on changes on plantations and very detailed breakdown of wine production. Due account is taken also of the necessary trade-off between user needs and the burden on respondents and national statistical institutes. New variables or breakdowns are offset by some requirements under the existing legislation being dropped. The level of additional requirements, especially information from businesses, is intended to lower the overall burden. As regards the information to be collected from respondents, the burden is lowered by introducing thresholds at farm and territorial level that are expected to entail smaller samples.Simplification: the proposal provides for simplification of administrative procedures for public authorities (EU or national) and for private parties. The reduced breakdown of supply-side data by regions, varieties, density classes, age classes and the withdrawal of production classes, the possibility of limiting the scope in terms of the size of the farms producing permanent crops and the withdrawal of transmission of annual data for changes in the vineyard area for wine will simplify the work of EU and national administrations.The possibility of limiting the scope of data collection in regard to permanent crops will reduce the burden on respondents, especially micro-enterprises. Giving Member States the freedom to produce the necessary figures by using a combination of sources (surveys, but also administrative data or estimation procedures) is intended to lighten the burden on respondents – enterprises and households alike.FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no implications for the budget of the European Union.
- DG {'url': 'http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home', 'title': 'Eurostat'}, REHN Olli

Documents

Legislative proposal published: COM(2010)0249
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0188/2011
Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T7-0487/2011
: Regulation 2011/1337
: OJ L 347 30.12.2011, p. 0007

Amendments	Dossier
25	2010/0133(COD) 2011/04/14 AGRI 25 amendments... Amendment 16 # Rareș-Lucian NICULESCU Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) It is necessary to strengthen cooperation between the authorities involved in the drawing up and publication of European statistics. Amendment 17 # Rareș-Lucian NICULESCU Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 b (new) (3b) In the process of preparing and drawing up European statistics, account should be taken of international recommendations and best practices. Amendment 18 # Rareș-Lucian NICULESCU Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation establishes a common framework for systematic production of comprehensive and reliable European statistics on the permanent crops listed in Annex I. Amendment 19 # Elisabeth JEGGLE Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Holdings can be excluded if they are of less than 0.15 hectare, producing entirely or mainly for the market of each permanent crop referred to in each Member State if their cumulated area represents less than 5% of the total planted area of the individual crop. Amendment 20 # Michel DANTIN Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Holdings can be excluded if they are of less than 0.15 hectare, producing entirely or mainly for the market of each permanent crop referred to in each Member State if their cumulated area represents less than 5% of the total planted area of the individual crop. Amendment 21 # Marc TARABELLA Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Holdings can be excluded if they are of less than 0.135 hectare, producing entirely or mainly for the market of each permanent crop referred to in each Member State if their cumulated area represents less than 5% of the total planted area of the individual crop. Amendment 22 # Rareș-Lucian NICULESCU Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Holdings can be excluded if they are of less than 0.13 hectare, producing entirely or mainly for the market of each permanent crop referred to in each Member State if their cumulated area represents less than 5% of the total planted area of the individual crop. Amendment 23 # Elisabeth JEGGLE Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. ~~Without prejudice to any delegated act adopted in accordance with Article 4 (4) of this Regulation, t~~The statistics for crops referred to in point 12 of Annex I shall be provided using the data available in the vineyard register implemented in accordance with Article 185a of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 for all the holdings included in this register as defined in Article 3(1a) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 436/2009. Amendment 24 # Richard ASHWORTH Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 3 3. Each Member State shall produce the structural statistics listed in Annexes II and III on the planted area of permanent crops with a minimum of 5000 ha for each individual permanent crop referred to in Annex I within the territory of that Member State. Amendment 25 # Rareș-Lucian NICULESCU Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission ~~shall~~may adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 10 for the purpose of modifying the list in Annex I and the statistics set out in Annexes II and III, provided that the system for statistical data collection is not affected. Amendment 26 # Michel DANTIN Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. The regional breakdown to be used is ~~as specifi~~NUTS level 1 for all the information contained in Annex I and NUTS level 2 for that contained in Annexes II and ~~III~~indicated as compulsory. Amendment 27 # Elisabeth JEGGLE Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall transmit to the Commission (Eurostat) the data set out in Annexes II ~~and III by 31 July~~by 30 September of the year following the reference period at the latest. and those set out in Annex III no later than 15 months after completion of the survey. Amendment 28 # Elisabeth JEGGLE Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. By 3~~1 July~~0 September 2013, and every five years thereafter, Member States shall provide the Commission (Eurostat) with reports on the quality of the data transmitted and the methods used. Amendment 29 # Elisabeth JEGGLE Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. No later than 15 months after completion of the survey in 2015, and every five years thereafter, Member States shall provide the Commission (Eurostat) with reports on the quality of the data transmitted and the methods used for the statistics on the crops referred to in Article 1l. Amendment 30 # Rareș-Lucian NICULESCU Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) While delegated acts are being prepared and drawn up, the Commission shall allow the European Parliament access to preparatory meetings, exchanges of views and consultations. Amendment 31 # Elisabeth JEGGLE Proposal for a regulation Annex II – point 3 3. Density classes Density classes Apple Peach, Orange, Olive Table and Nectarine and Small trees grape Pear Apricot trees citrus and vines trees Lemon trees Density (in 1 <400 <600 <250 <140 <1000 number of 2 400- 600-1199 250-499 140- 1000-1499 trees/hectar 1599 399 e) 3 1600- ≥1200 500-749 ≥400 ≥1500 3199 4 ≥3200 750-999 5 ≥1000 deleted Amendment 32 # Elisabeth JEGGLE Proposal for a regulation Annex II – point 4 4. ~~Age classes~~ Age classes Apple Peach, Nectarine Orange, Olive Table and and Apricot trees Small trees grape Pear citrus and vines trees Lemon trees Age (years 1 0-4 0-4 0-4 0-4 0-3 from 2 5-9 5-14 5-9 5-11 3-9 plantation) 3 10-14 and over 10-14 12-49 9-19 4 15-24 15-24 50 and 20 and over over 5 25 and 25 and over over deleted Amendment 33 # Michel DANTIN Proposal for a regulation Annex II – point 5 5. Summary The data (in ha) to be provided should be the following: Member State: Region: Specie: Group: Age class 1 Age class 2 Age class 3 Age class 4 Age class 5 Density class 1 Density class 2 Density class 3 Density class 4 Density class 5 deleted Amendment 34 # Elisabeth JEGGLE Proposal for a regulation Annex II – point 5 5. Summary The data (in ha) to be provided should be the following: Member State: Region: Species: Group: Age class 1 Age class 2 Age class 3 Age class 4 Age class 5 Density class 1 Density class 2 Density class 3 Density class 4 Density class 5 deleted Amendment 35 # Elisabeth JEGGLE Proposal for a regulation Annex III – Table 1 - Table 1.1 ~~Table 1.1: Wine-grower holdings by type of production by NUTS 3 (a)~~ Variables/Characteristics ~~No.~~ No. Area ~~Production~~ hold. prcl. (ha) (hl or 100kg)1 Red Wht(ha) Vine area, total Total (in/not yet in production) Vine area in wine grape varieties ~~b) b)~~ production planted - of which suitable for the with production of wines with ~~PDO~~ b)PDO b) - of which suitable for the production of wines with ~~PGI~~ PGI ~~b) b)~~ - of which suitable for the production of wines without PDO or PGI ~~b) b)~~ - of which "grapes for double end" ~~b) b)~~ dried grapes b) b) Total b) b) a) Member States concerned: BG, CZ, DE, IT, EL, ES, FR, HU, AT, PT, RO, SI and SK. b) Optional. _____ 1 "Olympic" average (3-year production in the last 5 crop years, excluding therefore the two extreme values). Total a) Member States concerned: BG, CZ, DE, IT, EL, ES, FR, HU, AT, PT, RO, SI and SK. b) Optional. Amendment 36 # Elisabeth JEGGLE Proposal for a regulation Annex III – Table 1 - Table 1.2 Table 1.2: Wine-grower holdings by type of production by NUTS 2 (a) Variables/Characteristics ~~No.~~ No. Area ~~Production~~ hold. ~~prcl.~~ (ha) ~~(hl or 100kg)3 Red Wht~~ Vine area, total (in/not Total yet in production) Vine area in wine grape varieties ~~b) b)~~ production planted - of which suitable for the with production of wines with ~~PDO~~ PDO ~~b) b)~~ - of which suitable for the production of wines with ~~PGI~~ PGI ~~b) b)~~ - of which suitable for the production of wines without PDO or PGI ~~b) b)~~ - of which "grapes for double end" ~~b) b) dried grapes b) b) Total b) b)~~dried grapes Total Vines not yet in wine grapes (including production, planted "grapes for double end") ~~- -~~ with - of which suitable for the production of wines with ~~PDO~~ PDO ~~- -~~ - of which suitable for the production of wines with PGI ~~- -~~ - of which suitable for the production of wines without PDO or PGI ~~- -~~ - of which "grapes for double end" ~~- -~~ dried grapes Total ~~- - Total - -~~ Vines (in/not yet in material for the vegetative production) intended propagation of vines ~~- -~~ to produce other vines not elsewhere classified (nec) ~~- -~~ a) Member States concerned: BG, CZ, DE, IT, EL, ES, FR, HU, AT, PT, RO, SI and SK. b) Optional. Amendment 37 # Elisabeth JEGGLE Proposal for a regulation Annex III – Table 1 - Table 1.3 Table 1.3: Data by type of production by production region (PDO (a), PGI (a), other areas) (b) Variables/Characteristics ~~No.~~ No. Area ~~Production~~ hold. ~~prcl.~~ (ha) ~~(hl or 100kg)3 Red Wht~~ Vine area, total (in/not Total yet in production) Vine area in wine grape varieties ~~c) c)~~ production planted - of which suitable for the with production of wines with ~~PDO~~ PDO ~~c) c)~~ - of which suitable for the production of wines with ~~PGI~~ PGI ~~c) c)~~ - of which suitable for the production of wines without PDO or PGI ~~c) c)~~ - of which "grapes for double end" c) c) dried grapes c) c) Total c) c)dried grapes Total Vines not yet in wine grapes (including production, planted "grapes for double end") ~~- -~~ with - of which suitable for the production of wines with ~~PDO~~ - PDO - - of which suitable for the production of wines with ~~PGI~~ PGI ~~- -~~ - of which suitable for the production of wines without PDO or PGI ~~- -~~ - of which "grapes for double end" - - dried grapes - - Total - - Vines (in/not yet in material for the vegetative - - dried grapes Total Vines (in/not yet in material for the vegetative Variables/Characteristics No. ~~No.~~ Area ~~Production~~ hold. ~~prcl. (ha) (hl or 100kg)3 Red Wht~~ (ha) production) intended propagation of vines to produce other vines not elsewhere classified (nec) ~~- -~~ a) The data by production region have to be produced for each "designation of origin or geographical indication" as referred to in Part II, Title II, Chapter I, Section I a, Subsection I of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007. b) Member States concerned: BG, CZ, DE, IT, EL, ES, FR, HU, AT, PT, RO, SI and SK. c) Optional. Amendment 38 # Elisabeth JEGGLE Proposal for a regulation Annex III – Table 2 - Table 2.1 Table 2.1: Wine-grower holdings by size classes of the total area under vines, total vineyard Size classes of (ha) No. hold. No. prcl. Area (ha) Prod. (hl or 100kg) < 0.10 Area (ha) < 0.10 0.10 - < 0.50 0.50 - < 1 1-<3 ~~3-<5 5 - < 10 > 10~~ 3-<5 5 - < 10 > 10 * Only for the country(ies) concerned. Amendment 39 # Elisabeth JEGGLE Proposal for a regulation Annex III – Table 3 - Table 3.1 Table 3.1: Wine-grower holdings by degree of specialisation and size classes by NUTS1/NUTS 2 (to be defined by MS) Degree of specialisation < 0.10 ha4 … … No. Area ~~Prod~~ No. ~~No.~~ Area Prod. Degree of specialisation hold. (ha) (hl or hold. (ha) (hl or 100 100 kg) kg hold. (ha) hold. (ha) Holdings with vines Holdings having vine areas exclusively intended for wine production of which holdings having vine areas exclusively intended for production of PDO and/or PGI wine - of which only PDO - of which only PGI - of which PDO and PGI of which holdings having vine areas exclusively intended for wine Degree of specialisation < 0.10 ha4 … No. Area No. Area hold. (ha) hold. (ha) production without PDO and/or PGI of which holdings having vine areas intended for the production of several types of wines Holdings having vine areas exclusively intended for production of dried grapes Holdings having other areas under vines Holdings having vine areas intended for several types of production Amendment 40 # Elisabeth JEGGLE Proposal for a regulation Annex III – Table 3 - Table 3.2 Degree of specialisation < 0.10 ha4 … … No. Area ~~Prod.~~ No. Area ~~Prod.~~ hold. (ha) ~~(hl or~~ hold. (ha) ~~(hl or 100 kg) 100 kg)~~ As for Table 3.1 source: PE-462.813

Amendments

Dossier

2010/0133(COD)

2011/04/14 AGRI 25 amendments...

Amendment 16 #

Rareș-Lucian NICULESCU

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 a (new)

(3a) It is necessary to strengthen cooperation between the authorities involved in the drawing up and publication of European statistics.

Amendment 17 #

Rareș-Lucian NICULESCU

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 b (new)

(3b) In the process of preparing and drawing up European statistics, account should be taken of international recommendations and best practices.

Amendment 18 #

Rareș-Lucian NICULESCU

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1

1. This Regulation establishes a common framework for systematic production of comprehensive and reliable European statistics on the permanent crops listed in Annex I.

Amendment 19 #

Elisabeth JEGGLE

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Holdings can be excluded if they are of less than 0.15 hectare, producing entirely or mainly for the market of each permanent crop referred to in each Member State if their cumulated area represents less than 5% of the total planted area of the individual crop.

Amendment 20 #

Michel DANTIN

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Amendment 21 #

Marc TARABELLA

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Holdings can be excluded if they are of less than 0.135 hectare, producing entirely or mainly for the market of each permanent crop referred to in each Member State if their cumulated area represents less than 5% of the total planted area of the individual crop.

Amendment 22 #

Rareș-Lucian NICULESCU

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Holdings can be excluded if they are of less than 0.13 hectare, producing entirely or mainly for the market of each permanent crop referred to in each Member State if their cumulated area represents less than 5% of the total planted area of the individual crop.

Amendment 23 #

Elisabeth JEGGLE

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 3

3. ~~Without prejudice to any delegated act adopted in accordance with Article 4 (4) of this Regulation, t~~The statistics for crops referred to in point 12 of Annex I shall be provided using the data available in the vineyard register implemented in accordance with Article 185a of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 for all the holdings included in this register as defined in Article 3(1a) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 436/2009.

Amendment 24 #

Richard ASHWORTH

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 3

3. Each Member State shall produce the structural statistics listed in Annexes II and III on the planted area of permanent crops with a minimum of 5000 ha for each individual permanent crop referred to in Annex I within the territory of that Member State.

Amendment 25 #

Rareș-Lucian NICULESCU

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4

4. The Commission ~~shall~~may adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 10 for the purpose of modifying the list in Annex I and the statistics set out in Annexes II and III, provided that the system for statistical data collection is not affected.

Amendment 26 #

Michel DANTIN

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1

1. The regional breakdown to be used is ~~as specifi~~NUTS level 1 for all the information contained in Annex I and NUTS level 2 for that contained in Annexes II and ~~III~~indicated as compulsory.

Amendment 27 #

Elisabeth JEGGLE

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1

1. Member States shall transmit to the Commission (Eurostat) the data set out in Annexes II ~~and III by 31 July~~by 30 September of the year following the reference period at the latest. and those set out in Annex III no later than 15 months after completion of the survey.

Amendment 28 #

Elisabeth JEGGLE

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2

2. By 3~~1 July~~0 September 2013, and every five years thereafter, Member States shall provide the Commission (Eurostat) with reports on the quality of the data transmitted and the methods used.

Amendment 29 #

Elisabeth JEGGLE

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new)

2a. No later than 15 months after completion of the survey in 2015, and every five years thereafter, Member States shall provide the Commission (Eurostat) with reports on the quality of the data transmitted and the methods used for the statistics on the crops referred to in Article 1l.

Amendment 30 #

Rareș-Lucian NICULESCU

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)

(1a) While delegated acts are being prepared and drawn up, the Commission shall allow the European Parliament access to preparatory meetings, exchanges of views and consultations.

Amendment 31 #

Elisabeth JEGGLE

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 3

3. Density classes Density classes Apple Peach, Orange, Olive Table and Nectarine and Small trees grape Pear Apricot trees citrus and vines trees Lemon trees Density (in 1 <400 <600 <250 <140 <1000 number of 2 400- 600-1199 250-499 140- 1000-1499 trees/hectar 1599 399 e) 3 1600- ≥1200 500-749 ≥400 ≥1500 3199 4 ≥3200 750-999 5 ≥1000 deleted

Amendment 32 #

Elisabeth JEGGLE

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 4

4. ~~Age classes~~ Age classes Apple Peach, Nectarine Orange, Olive Table and and Apricot trees Small trees grape Pear citrus and vines trees Lemon trees Age (years 1 0-4 0-4 0-4 0-4 0-3 from 2 5-9 5-14 5-9 5-11 3-9 plantation) 3 10-14 and over 10-14 12-49 9-19 4 15-24 15-24 50 and 20 and over over 5 25 and 25 and over over deleted

Amendment 33 #

Michel DANTIN

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 5

5. Summary The data (in ha) to be provided should be the following: Member State: Region: Specie: Group: Age class 1 Age class 2 Age class 3 Age class 4 Age class 5 Density class 1 Density class 2 Density class 3 Density class 4 Density class 5 deleted

Amendment 34 #

Elisabeth JEGGLE

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – point 5

5. Summary The data (in ha) to be provided should be the following: Member State: Region: Species: Group: Age class 1 Age class 2 Age class 3 Age class 4 Age class 5 Density class 1 Density class 2 Density class 3 Density class 4 Density class 5 deleted

Amendment 35 #

Elisabeth JEGGLE

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Table 1 - Table 1.1

~~Table 1.1: Wine-grower holdings by type of production by NUTS 3 (a)~~ Variables/Characteristics ~~No.~~ No. Area ~~Production~~ hold. prcl. (ha) (hl or 100kg)1 Red Wht(ha) Vine area, total Total (in/not yet in production) Vine area in wine grape varieties ~~b) b)~~ production planted - of which suitable for the with production of wines with ~~PDO~~ b)PDO b) - of which suitable for the production of wines with ~~PGI~~ PGI ~~b) b)~~ - of which suitable for the production of wines without PDO or PGI ~~b) b)~~ - of which "grapes for double end" ~~b) b)~~ dried grapes b) b) Total b) b) a) Member States concerned: BG, CZ, DE, IT, EL, ES, FR, HU, AT, PT, RO, SI and SK. b) Optional. _____ 1 "Olympic" average (3-year production in the last 5 crop years, excluding therefore the two extreme values). Total a) Member States concerned: BG, CZ, DE, IT, EL, ES, FR, HU, AT, PT, RO, SI and SK. b) Optional.

Amendment 36 #

Elisabeth JEGGLE

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Table 1 - Table 1.2

Table 1.2: Wine-grower holdings by type of production by NUTS 2 (a) Variables/Characteristics ~~No.~~ No. Area ~~Production~~ hold. ~~prcl.~~ (ha) ~~(hl or 100kg)3 Red Wht~~ Vine area, total (in/not Total yet in production) Vine area in wine grape varieties ~~b) b)~~ production planted - of which suitable for the with production of wines with ~~PDO~~ PDO ~~b) b)~~ - of which suitable for the production of wines with ~~PGI~~ PGI ~~b) b)~~ - of which suitable for the production of wines without PDO or PGI ~~b) b)~~ - of which "grapes for double end" ~~b) b) dried grapes b) b) Total b) b)~~dried grapes Total Vines not yet in wine grapes (including production, planted "grapes for double end") ~~- -~~ with - of which suitable for the production of wines with ~~PDO~~ PDO ~~- -~~ - of which suitable for the production of wines with PGI ~~- -~~ - of which suitable for the production of wines without PDO or PGI ~~- -~~ - of which "grapes for double end" ~~- -~~ dried grapes Total ~~- - Total - -~~ Vines (in/not yet in material for the vegetative production) intended propagation of vines ~~- -~~ to produce other vines not elsewhere classified (nec) ~~- -~~ a) Member States concerned: BG, CZ, DE, IT, EL, ES, FR, HU, AT, PT, RO, SI and SK. b) Optional.

Amendment 37 #

Elisabeth JEGGLE

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Table 1 - Table 1.3

Table 1.3: Data by type of production by production region (PDO (a), PGI (a), other areas) (b) Variables/Characteristics ~~No.~~ No. Area ~~Production~~ hold. ~~prcl.~~ (ha) ~~(hl or 100kg)3 Red Wht~~ Vine area, total (in/not Total yet in production) Vine area in wine grape varieties ~~c) c)~~ production planted - of which suitable for the with production of wines with ~~PDO~~ PDO ~~c) c)~~ - of which suitable for the production of wines with ~~PGI~~ PGI ~~c) c)~~ - of which suitable for the production of wines without PDO or PGI ~~c) c)~~ - of which "grapes for double end" c) c) dried grapes c) c) Total c) c)dried grapes Total Vines not yet in wine grapes (including production, planted "grapes for double end") ~~- -~~ with - of which suitable for the production of wines with ~~PDO~~ - PDO - - of which suitable for the production of wines with ~~PGI~~ PGI ~~- -~~ - of which suitable for the production of wines without PDO or PGI ~~- -~~ - of which "grapes for double end" - - dried grapes - - Total - - Vines (in/not yet in material for the vegetative - - dried grapes Total Vines (in/not yet in material for the vegetative Variables/Characteristics No. ~~No.~~ Area ~~Production~~ hold. ~~prcl. (ha) (hl or 100kg)3 Red Wht~~ (ha) production) intended propagation of vines to produce other vines not elsewhere classified (nec) ~~- -~~ a) The data by production region have to be produced for each "designation of origin or geographical indication" as referred to in Part II, Title II, Chapter I, Section I a, Subsection I of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007. b) Member States concerned: BG, CZ, DE, IT, EL, ES, FR, HU, AT, PT, RO, SI and SK. c) Optional.

Amendment 38 #

Elisabeth JEGGLE

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Table 2 - Table 2.1

Table 2.1: Wine-grower holdings by size classes of the total area under vines, total vineyard Size classes of (ha) No. hold. No. prcl. Area (ha) Prod. (hl or 100kg) < 0.10 *Area (ha) < 0.10 * 0.10 - < 0.50 0.50 - < 1 1-<3 ~~3-<5 5 - < 10 > 10~~ 3-<5 5 - < 10 > 10 * Only for the country(ies) concerned.

Amendment 39 #

Elisabeth JEGGLE

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Table 3 - Table 3.1

Table 3.1: Wine-grower holdings by degree of specialisation and size classes by NUTS1/NUTS 2 (to be defined by MS) Degree of specialisation < 0.10 ha4 … … No. Area ~~Prod~~ No. ~~No.~~ Area Prod. Degree of specialisation hold. (ha) (hl or hold. (ha) (hl or 100 100 kg) kg hold. (ha) hold. (ha) Holdings with vines Holdings having vine areas exclusively intended for wine production of which holdings having vine areas exclusively intended for production of PDO and/or PGI wine - of which only PDO - of which only PGI - of which PDO and PGI of which holdings having vine areas exclusively intended for wine Degree of specialisation < 0.10 ha4 … No. Area No. Area hold. (ha) hold. (ha) production without PDO and/or PGI of which holdings having vine areas intended for the production of several types of wines Holdings having vine areas exclusively intended for production of dried grapes Holdings having other areas under vines Holdings having vine areas intended for several types of production

Amendment 40 #

Elisabeth JEGGLE

Proposal for a regulation
Annex III – Table 3 - Table 3.2

Degree of specialisation < 0.10 ha4 … … No. Area ~~Prod.~~ No. Area ~~Prod.~~ hold. (ha) ~~(hl or~~ hold. (ha) ~~(hl or 100 kg) 100 kg)~~ As for Table 3.1

source: PE-462.813

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

2019-07-06Show (14) Changes | Timetravel

activities	date: 2010-05-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0249/COM_COM(2010)0249_EN.pdf title: COM(2010)0249 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52010PC0249:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home title: Eurostat Commissioner: REHN Olli type: Legislative proposal published date: 2010-06-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AGRI date: 2010-06-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: GABRIEL Mariya date: 2011-05-02T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AGRI date: 2010-06-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: GABRIEL Mariya type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading date: 2011-05-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-188&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A7-0188/2011 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AGRI date: 2010-06-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: GABRIEL Mariya type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading date: 2011-11-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=20068&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-487 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0487/2011 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament date: 2011-12-01T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs meeting_id: 3131 date: 2011-12-01T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading date: 2011-12-13T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed date: 2011-12-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament date: 2011-12-30T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32011R1337 title: Regulation 2011/1337 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2011:347:TOC title: OJ L 347 30.12.2011, p. 0007
commission	body: EC dg: Eurostat commissioner: REHN Olli
committees/0	type Responsible Committee body EP associated False committee_full Agriculture and Rural Development committee AGRI date 2010-06-02T00:00:00 rapporteur name: GABRIEL Mariya group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/0	body EP responsible True committee AGRI date 2010-06-02T00:00:00 committee_full Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur group: PPE name: GABRIEL Mariya
council	body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs meeting_id: 3131 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3131*&MEET_DATE=01/12/2011 date: 2011-12-01T00:00:00
docs	date: 2011-03-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE445.697 title: PE445.697 type: Committee draft report body: EP date: 2011-04-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE462.813 title: PE462.813 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP date: 2011-05-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-188&language=EN title: A7-0188/2011 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP date: 2011-12-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=[%n4]%2F11&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 00054/2011/LEX type: Draft final act body: CSL date: 2012-01-11T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=20068&j=0&l=en title: SP(2012)29 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary date: 2016-03-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2016/0158/COM_COM(2016)0158_EN.pdf title: COM(2016)0158 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2016&nu_doc=0158 title: EUR-Lex type: Follow-up document body: EC date: 2019-02-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2019/0050/COM_COM(2019)0050_EN.pdf title: COM(2019)0050 summary: The Commission presents a report on the functioning of Regulation (EU) No 1337/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning European statistics on permanent crops. Regulation (EU) No 1337/2011 covers two structural data collections on permanent crops: orchard data collection on apple, pear, peach, nectarine, orange, lemon, small citrus fruit and olive trees and vines for table grapes; and vineyard data collection on vineyards producing grapes for wine, raisins and dual purpose grapes. Three data collections have been organised: two on orchards (2012 and 2017) and one on vineyards (2015). Main findings The report states that Regulation (EU) No 1337/2011 has not worked as was planned when it was adopted. This is due to the data content and the cross-tabulation of data being too detailed. These factors contributed to the heavy burden on respondents and high data collection costs, resulting in confidential data. The user needs also changed over the years and currently the Commission requires fewer details With regard to orchard data collection, the Commission found two consequences from having the data variables (species group, colour of fruit, time of harvest, age, density) cross-tabled against each other: (i) Member States have to use very high sampling rates; (ii) the detailed breakdown of the data leads to costly and time consuming data collections. The average cost of the orchard data collection (per reference year) is approximately EUR 220 000 per country, ranging from EUR 2 500 to EUR 900 000. The labour input in statistical authorities ranges from 0.1 full time equivalent (FTE) to 6.2 FTE. There is also a very heavy burden on respondents due to very large samples and long questionnaires requiring a lot of area measurements. The large investment made at national level for collecting very detailed information unfortunately does not bring the full benefit to the data users as some of the collected data cannot be released due to statistical confidentiality. With regard to vineyard data, the obligatory link between the vineyard register set up in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 , and the vineyard data collection under the Regulation poses problems in several Member States as the register is not always up to date and it does not contain all the variables listed in the Regulation. User needs have also changed over the past decade, and the Commission needs fewer details. The following variables are no longer needed: (i) species groups for apples and pears; (ii) colour of fruit for peaches, nectarines and table grapes; and (iii) the time of harvest for peaches, nectarines, apricots, oranges and small citrus fruits. In addition, there is no longer a need to cross-tabulate certain variables. New Framework Regulation on Integrated Farm Statistics (IFS) The structural data collections on orchards and vineyards will take place under the orchard and vineyards modules of Regulation 2018/1091 (IFS Regulation) adopted in July 2018. Regulation (EU) No 1337/2011 has been repealed with effect from 1 January 2022. The IFS Regulation also covers the farm structure survey currently covered by the Regulation on farm surveys , the statistics on the structure of orchards and vineyards under Regulation (EU) No 1337/2011 and some agri-environmental indicators. The orchard data collection under the IFS orchard module will take place in 2023. The collection of vineyard data under the IFS Regulation will take place in 2026. The 2020 vineyard data collection will still take place under Regulation (EU) No 1337/2011 to allow enough time to align the statistical holding register with the vineyard register, which is necessary under the IFS Regulation. The new legal basis for the structural data on orchards and vineyards will better meet user needs and it is expected to reduce the burden on respondents. The orchard and vineyard module data under the IFS Regulation will allow the holdings cultivating fruit trees and vines to be thoroughly analysed. This is thanks to ample possibilities offered by the delivery of micro data, which will allow the structure of the orchards and vineyards to be linked with the full structural 7 data of the farms. Therefore, this will strengthen the evidence base used for taking decisions affecting the sector. type: Follow-up document body: EC date: 2010-07-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0249 title: COM(2010)0249 type: Contribution body: IT_SENATE date: 2010-07-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0249 title: COM(2010)0249 type: Contribution body: PT_PARLIAMENT
events	date: 2010-05-21T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0249/COM_COM(2010)0249_EN.pdf title: COM(2010)0249 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2010&nu_doc=249 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to update the common framework for the systematic production of permanent crop statistics. PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. LEGAL BASE: Article 338(1) on the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. BACKGROUND: Council Regulation (EEC) No 357/79 on statistical surveys of areas under vines and Directive 2001/109/EC concerning the statistical surveys to be carried out by Member States in order to determine the production potential of plantations of certain species of fruit trees provided for the establishment of an information system on the most important permanent crops statistics at European level. These legal acts have helped create national systems for collecting data on the production potential of these crops, from a business perspective and as regards structural characteristics of the production units. However, both users and producers of the data have underlined the need for an update. On the one hand, changes in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and market situation of these products since the existing legislation entered into force have created new or different user needs in terms of variables and breakdowns and more timely data. On the other hand, there is still scope for improving the comparability and completeness of the framework by doing more to harmonise the variables and concepts and to allow Member States more freedom to choose the methods and sources they use, including administrative sources, to collect the basic data needed to produce such statistics. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the following options were examined: Option 1 (baseline option, i.e. no new EU). If the EU were to take no new action, the comparability and harmonisation of permanent crop statistics across Europe would be weakened and, in a setting where the share of permanent crops is predominant in a big part of EU regions, the opportunities to make efficient use of statistics compiled by partner countries on the basis of common concepts and reporting formats would not be fully exploited. Where permanent crop statistics from official sources are not harmonised or not available, or are only partially available because they are provided voluntarily, other sources must be used (stakeholders and traders' organisations). As a result, the quality of the data might suffer and this might have an adverse impact on policymaking. Option 2 (EU involvement as proposed). The proposed framework for European statistics makes the data more comparable and thus more relevant for users at both European and national level. Additionally, the use of common concepts and reporting formats can help to make the collection and use of permanent crop statistics more efficient. CONTENT: the aim of this proposal is to update, simplify and optimise the existing legal framework for European statistics on permanent crops replacing the existing two legal acts mentioned above by a single one. The proposal revises some variables, greatly simplifying the breakdown of production and regions, and takes into account recent changes in the categories of wines . From a supply side perspective, the proposal responds to changes in user needs, e.g. for data on olive plantations. It also updates the data transmission deadlines . The proposal further simplifies the variables and concepts and significantly adapts the permanent crop statistics to actual user needs by cancelling the annual statistics on changes on plantations and very detailed breakdown of wine production. Due account is taken also of the necessary trade-off between user needs and the burden on respondents and national statistical institutes. New variables or breakdowns are offset by some requirements under the existing legislation being dropped. The level of additional requirements, especially information from businesses, is intended to lower the overall burden. As regards the information to be collected from respondents, the burden is lowered by introducing thresholds at farm and territorial level that are expected to entail smaller samples. Simplification : the proposal provides for simplification of administrative procedures for public authorities (EU or national) and for private parties. The reduced breakdown of supply-side data by regions, varieties, density classes, age classes and the withdrawal of production classes, the possibility of limiting the scope in terms of the size of the farms producing permanent crops and the withdrawal of transmission of annual data for changes in the vineyard area for wine will simplify the work of EU and national administrations. The possibility of limiting the scope of data collection in regard to permanent crops will reduce the burden on respondents, especially micro-enterprises. Giving Member States the freedom to produce the necessary figures by using a combination of sources (surveys, but also administrative data or estimation procedures) is intended to lighten the burden on respondents – enterprises and households alike. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no implications for the budget of the European Union. date: 2010-06-15T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP date: 2011-05-02T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development adopted the report drafted by Mariya NEDELCHEVA (EPP, BG) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning European statistics on permanent crops. It recommends that the European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading, under the ordinary legislative procedure, amends the Commission proposal as follows: List of permanent crops : Members consider that the list of permanent crops to which this Regulation applies constitutes an essential element (scope), which should be defined in the articles of the legislative act and should not be subject to amendment by delegated acts. Coverage : with a view to reducing the administrative burden placed on small holdings, Members propose to amend the precision requirements, to exclude all small holdings of less than 0.2 hectares from the scope of the provisions and no longer requiring a breakdown by NUTS 3 region to be given for certain data on vines for purposes other than for the production of table grapes. The statistics on areas under vines should be compiled solely on the basis of the data available in the vineyard register. Reference year : the report states that the statistics provided shall refer to the planted area after the usual planting period. Transmission to the Commission : the existing deadlines for the transmission of data have been proved satisfactory in practice. However, the Commission proposed to bring this date to 31 July 2013 following the reference year, Members suggest retaining 31 September 2013 in the new Regulation. By 30 September 2016, and every five years thereafter, Member States shall provide the Commission (Eurostat) with reports on the quality of the data transmitted and the methods used for the statistics on the crops. Delegated acts : Members propose a series of amendments relating to delegated acts. The objectives, content, scope and duration of the delegation of power pursuant to Article 290 TFEU must be explicitly and meticulously defined in each basic act. The wording used is based on the Common Understanding agreed by the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission and approved by the Conference of Committee Chairs at its meeting of 15 February 2011. date: 2011-05-06T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-188&language=EN title: A7-0188/2011 date: 2011-11-15T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=20068&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament date: 2011-11-15T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-487 title: T7-0487/2011 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 610 votes to 15, with 9 abstentions, a resolution in the first reading of the ordinary legislative procedure and amended the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning European statistics on permanent crops. The amendments are the result of a compromise agreement between Parliament and Council. The main amendments to the Commission proposal are as follows: List of permanent crops : the Regulation establishes a common framework for the systematic production of European statistics on the following permanent crops: (i) dessert apple trees; (ii) apple trees for industrial processing (optional); (iii) dessert pear trees ; (iv) pear trees for industrial processing (optional) ; (v) apricot trees; (vi) dessert peach trees; (vii) peach trees for industrial processing (optional); (viii) orange trees; (ix) small citrus fruit trees (optional); (x) lemon trees; (xi) olive trees; (xii) vines intended for the production of table grapes; (xiii) vines intended for other purposes. Coverage : Member States may exclude holdings below a threshold of 0.2 ha of each permanent crop producing entirely or mainly for the market in each Member State. If the area covered by such holdings is less than 5% of the total planted area of the individual crop, Member States may increase that threshold provided that this does not lead to the exclusion of more than an additional 5 % of the total planted area of the individual crop. Data production : save where the option referred to above has been exercised, only Member States with a minimum planted area of 1000 ha of each individual crop shall produce, during 2012 and every five years thereafter, the data referred to in the text. Member States with a minimum planted area of 500 ha of vines for other purposes shall produce, during 2015 and every five years thereafter, the data referred to in Annex II. Delegated acts : in order to take into account economic and technical developments, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts concerning the amendment of: (a) the breakdowns of species by groups, density classes and age classes set out in Annex I, and (b) the variables/characteristics, size classes, degree of specialisation and vine varieties set out in Annex II, except in respect of the optional nature of the required information In exercising this power, the Commission must ensure that the delegated acts do not impose a significant additional administrative burden on the Member States and on the respondents. Regional statistics : data with regard to statistics on permanent crops referred to above save vines for other purposes and further specified in Annex I to this Regulation, shall be broken down by NUTS 1 territorial units, save where a less detailed breakdown is specified in the Regulation. Data with regard to vines for other purposes shall be broken down by NUTS 2 territorial units. Derogation : where the application of the Regulation to the national statistical system of a Member State requires major adaptations and is likely to cause significant practical problems with regard to the permanent, the Commission may adopt implementing acts granting a derogation from its application to that Member State until 31 December 2012. Those Member States benefiting from a derogation shall continue to apply Directive 2001/109/EC. Review : the Commission will review the functioning of the Regulation by 31 December 2018 and every five years thereafter, and shall also assess whether it is necessary to produce all the data referred to in the text. Where the Commission considers that some of those data are no longer required, it shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts that delete certain data from Annexes I and II. date: 2011-12-01T00:00:00 type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading body: EP/CSL date: 2011-12-13T00:00:00 type: Final act signed body: CSL date: 2011-12-13T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP date: 2011-12-30T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to update the common framework for the systematic production of permanent crop statistics. LEGISLATIVE ACT : Regulation (EU) No 1337/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning European statistics on permanent crops and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 357/79 and Directive 2001/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. CONTENT: following an agreement at first reading with the European Parliament, the Council adopted this Regulation concerning European statistics on permanent crops. The aim of the Regulation is to update and simplify the legal framework for European statistics on permanent crops (vines and fruits). Since Regulation (EEC) 357/79 on vines and Directive 2001/109/EC on fruit trees came into force, both production conditions and the market situation have undergone significant changes. The new Regulation: · simplifies the breakdown of production and regions and takes into account recent changes in the categories of wines ; · significantly adapts the permanent crop statistics by cancelling the annual statistics on changes to plantations and the detailed breakdown on wine production ; · simplifies the variables and concepts involved; · responds to changes in user need e.g for data on olive plantations; · updates the transmission deadlines for data. The main points are as follows: List of permanent crops : the Regulation establishes a common framework for the systematic production of European statistics on the following permanent crops: (i) dessert apple trees; (ii) apple trees for industrial processing (optional); (iii) dessert pear trees; (iv) pear trees for industrial processing (optional); (v) apricot trees; (vi) dessert peach trees; (vii) peach trees for industrial processing (optional); (viii) orange trees; (ix) small citrus fruit trees (optional); (x) lemon trees; (xi) olive trees; (xii) vines intended for the production of table grapes; (xiii) vines intended for other purposes. Coverage: statistics to be provided on permanent crops shall be representative of at least 95 % of the total planted area producing entirely or mainly for the market of each permanent crop referred to in each Member State. However, Member States may exclude holdings below a threshold of 0.2 ha of each permanent crop producing entirely or mainly for the market in each Member State. If the area covered by such holdings is less than 5% of the total planted area of the individual crop, Member States may increase that threshold provided that this does not lead to the exclusion of more than an additional 5 % of the total planted area of the individual crop. Data production : save where the option referred to above has been exercised, only Member States with a minimum planted area of 1000 ha of each individual crop shall produce, during 2012 and every five years thereafter, the data referred to in Annex I. Member States with a minimum planted area of 500 ha of vines for other purposes shall produce, during 2015 and every five years thereafter, the data referred to in Annex II. Precision requirements : Member States conducting sample surveys in order to obtain statistics on permanent crops shall take all necessary steps to ensure that the coefficient of variation of the data shall not exceed, at national level, 3 % for the planted area for each crop. Regional statistics : data with regard to statistics on permanent crops referred to above save vines for other purposes and further specified in Annex I to this Regulation, shall be broken down by NUTS 1 territorial units, save where a less detailed breakdown is specified in the Regulation. Data with regard to vines for other purposes shall be broken down by NUTS 2 territorial units. Transmission to the Commission : the data set out in Annexes I and II must be transmitted by 30 September of the year following the reference period. Derogation : where the application of the Regulation to the national statistical system of a Member State requires major adaptations and is likely to cause significant practical problems with regard to the permanent, the Commission may adopt implementing acts granting a derogation from its application to that Member State until 31 December 2012. Those Member States benefiting from a derogation shall continue to apply Directive 2001/109/EC. Review: the Commission will review the functioning of the Regulation by 31 December 2018 and every five years thereafter, and shall also assess whether it is necessary to produce all the data referred to in the text. Where the Commission considers that some of those data are no longer required, it shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts that delete certain data from Annexes I and II. ENTRY INTO FORCE: 31/12/2011. APPLICATION: 01/01/2012. DELEGATED ACTS: the power to adopt the delegated acts is conferred on the Commission for a period of 5 years from 31 December 2011 (tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than 3 months before the end of each period.) The delegation of power may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A delegated act shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of 2 months of notification of that act (extended by 2 months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.) docs: title: Regulation 2011/1337 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32011R1337 title: OJ L 347 30.12.2011, p. 0007 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2011:347:TOC
other	body: EC dg: url: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home title: Eurostat commissioner: REHN Olli
procedure/Modified legal basis	Old Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150 New Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee	Old AGRI/7/03015 New AGRI/7/03015
procedure/final/url	Old http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32011R1337 New https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32011R1337
procedure/instrument	Old Regulation New Regulation Repealing Regulation (EEC) No 357/79 Repealing Directive 2001/109/EC 2000/0291(COD) Repealed by 2016/0389(COD)
procedure/subject	Old 3.10.06 Crop products in general, floriculture 3.10.30 Agricultural statistics New 3.10.06 Crop products in general, floriculture 3.10.30 Agricultural statistics
procedure/summary	Repealing Directive 2001/109/EC Repealing Regulation (EEC) No 357/79

2015-11-04Show (1) Changes | Timetravel

activities/0/docs/0/celexid

CELEX:52010PC0249:EN

2015-11-04Show (2) Changes | Timetravel

activities/0/docs/0/celexid	CELEX:52010PC0249:EN
links/European Commission/title	Old PreLex New EUR-Lex

2014-11-09Show (5) Changes

activities	date: 2010-05-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0249/COM_COM(2010)0249_EN.pdf title: COM(2010)0249 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52010PC0249:EN body: EC type: Legislative proposal published commission: DG: url: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home title: Eurostat Commissioner: REHN Olli date: 2010-06-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AGRI date: 2010-06-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: GABRIEL Mariya date: 2011-05-02T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AGRI date: 2010-06-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: GABRIEL Mariya type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading date: 2011-05-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-188&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A7-0188/2011 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AGRI date: 2010-06-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: GABRIEL Mariya type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading date: 2011-11-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=20068&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-487 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0487/2011 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament date: 2011-12-01T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs meeting_id: 3131 date: 2011-12-01T00:00:00 body: EP/CSL type: Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading date: 2011-12-13T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Final act signed date: 2011-12-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: End of procedure in Parliament date: 2011-12-30T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32011R1337 title: Regulation 2011/1337 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2011:347:TOC title: OJ L 347 30.12.2011, p. 0007
committees	body: EP responsible: True committee: AGRI date: 2010-06-02T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: GABRIEL Mariya
links	National parliaments url: http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2010&number=0133&appLng=EN title: IPEX European Commission url: http://ec.europa.eu/prelex/liste_resultats.cfm?CL=en&ReqId=0&DocType=COD&DocYear=2010&DocNum=0133 title: PreLex
other	body: EC dg: url: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home title: Eurostat commissioner: REHN Olli
procedure	dossier_of_the_committee AGRI/7/03015 reference 2010/0133(COD) subtype Legislation legal_basis Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 338-p1 stage_reached Procedure completed summary Repealing Directive 2001/109/EC Repealing Regulation (EEC) No 357/79 instrument Regulation Modified legal basis Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150 title Agricultural statistics: permanent crops type COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure) final url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32011R1337 title: Regulation 2011/1337 subject 3.10.06 Crop products in general, floriculture 3.10.30 Agricultural statistics

Activites

Documents

History

ParlTrack - 2011-2024