{"change_dates":[],"dossier":{"amendments":[{"authors":"Spyros Danellis, David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-44","justification":"Primary auctioning of slots, as also to a certain extent secondary trading of slots, would\nbenefit larger carriers and would favour more profitable long-haul routes. Until the capacity\nproblem is addressed in a more comprehensive way, this will inevitably be at the expense of\nEuropean regions' access to hubs and hub economies.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 4"]],"meps":[99325,96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:40"},"new":["(4) The slot allocation system established","in 1993 does not ensure the optimum","allocation and use of slots and thus of","airport capacity. In the context of growing","airport congestion and the limited","development of major new airport","infrastructure, the slots are a rare resource.","Access to such resources is of crucial","importance for the provision of air","transport services and for the maintenance","of effective competition. To this end, the","allocation and use of slots could be made","more effective by introducing market","mechanisms, by ensuring that the unused","slots are made available to interested","operators as soon as possible and in a","transparent manner, and by reinforcing the","underlying principles of the system with","regard to the allocation, management and","use of the slots. At the same time,","concerns regarding efficient allocation of","slots must continue to be balanced against","the need to protect the external benefits of","air transport services and in particular the","value that they create for European","regions."],"old":["(4) The slot allocation system established","in 1993 does not ensure the optimum","allocation and use of slots and thus of","airport capacity. In the context of growing","airport congestion and the limited","development of major new airport","infrastructure, the slots are a rare resource.","Access to such resources is of crucial","importance for the provision of air","transport services and for the maintenance","of effective competition. To this end, the","allocation and use of slots could be made","more effective by introducing market","mechanisms, by ensuring that the unused","slots are made available to interested","operators as soon as possible and in a","transparent manner, and by reinforcing the","underlying principles of the system with","regard to the allocation, management and","use of the slots. At the same time,","although the historical slots meet the need","for stability in schedules for the airlines,","during the future assessment of the","application of this Regulation, a gradual","introduction of other market mechanisms","could be envisaged, such as withdrawing","and auctioning historical slots."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"44","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" James Nicholson","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-45","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Recital 4"]],"meps":[1318],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:40"},"new":["(4) The slot allocation system established","in 1993 does not ensure the optimum","allocation and use of slots and thus of","airport capacity. In the context of growing","airport congestion and the limited","development of major new airport","infrastructure, the slots are a rare resource.","Access to such resources is of crucial","importance for the provision of air","transport services and for the maintenance","of effective competition. To this end, the","allocation and use of slots could be made","more effective by introducing market","mechanisms, by ensuring that the unused","slots are made available to interested","operators as soon as possible and in a","transparent manner, and by reinforcing the","underlying principles of the system with","regard to the allocation, management and","use of the slots. In addition it is important","that access to hub airports from regional","airports should be maintained where such","routes are essential to the economy of that","region. At the same time, although the","historical slots meet the need for stability","in schedules for the airlines, during the","future assessment of the application of this","Regulation, a gradual introduction of other","market mechanisms could be envisaged,","such as withdrawing and auctioning","historical slots."],"old":["(4) The slot allocation system established","in 1993 does not ensure the optimum","allocation and use of slots and thus of","airport capacity. In the context of growing","airport congestion and the limited","development of major new airport","infrastructure, the slots are a rare resource.","Access to such resources is of crucial","importance for the provision of air","transport services and for the maintenance","of effective competition. To this end, the","allocation and use of slots could be made","more effective by introducing market","mechanisms, by ensuring that the unused","slots are made available to interested","operators as soon as possible and in a","transparent manner, and by reinforcing the","underlying principles of the system with","regard to the allocation, management and","use of the slots. At the same time, although","the historical slots meet the need for","stability in schedules for the airlines,","during the future assessment of the","application of this Regulation, a gradual","introduction of other market mechanisms","could be envisaged, such as withdrawing","and auctioning historical slots."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"45","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Dominique Riquet","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-46","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 4"]],"meps":[96885],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:40"},"new":["(4) The slot-allocation system established","in 1993 does not ensure the optimum","allocation and use of slots and thus of","airport capacity. In the context of growing","airport congestion and the limited","development of major new airport","infrastructure, the slots are a rare resource.","Access to such resources is of crucial","importance for the provision of air","transport services and for the maintenance","of effective competition. To this end, the","allocation and use of slots could be made","more effective by introducing slot","exchange mechanisms, by ensuring that","the unused slots are made available to","interested operators as soon as possible and","in a transparent manner, and by reinforcing","the underlying principles of the system","with regard to the allocation, management","and use of the slots."],"old":["(4) The slot-allocation system established","in 1993 does not ensure the optimum","allocation and use of slots and thus of","airport capacity. In the context of growing","airport congestion and the limited","development of major new airport","infrastructure, the slots are a rare resource.","Access to such resources is of crucial","importance for the provision of air","transport services and for the maintenance","of effective competition. To this end, the","allocation and use of slots could be made","more effective by introducing market","mechanisms, by ensuring that the unused","slots are made available to interested","operators as soon as possible and in a","transparent manner, and by reinforcing the","underlying principles of the system with","regard to the allocation, management and","use of the slots. At the same time,","although the historical slots meet the need","for stability in schedules for the airlines,","during the future assessment of the","application of this Regulation, a gradual","introduction of other market mechanisms","could be envisaged, such as withdrawing","and auctioning historical slots."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"46","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Christine De Veyrac, Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-47","justification":" There is no justification whatsoever given for the introduction of secondary trading at a\n European level. The necessary guarantees for a market open to genuine competition have not\n been provided. A monetisation of trading is no answer to the issue of the congestion of the\n EU\u2019s airports.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 4"]],"meps":[4347,97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:40"},"new":["(4) The slot-allocation system established","in 1993 does not ensure the optimum","allocation and use of slots and thus of","airport capacity. In the context of growing","airport congestion and the limited","development of major new airport","infrastructure, the slots are a rare resource.","Access to such resources is of crucial","importance for the provision of air","transport services and for the maintenance","of effective competition. To this end, the","allocation and use of slots could be made","more effective by ensuring that the unused","slots are made available to interested","operators as soon as possible and in a","transparent manner, and by reinforcing the","underlying principles of the system with","regard to the allocation, management and","use of the slots."],"old":["(4) The slot-allocation system established","in 1993 does not ensure the optimum","allocation and use of slots and thus of","","airport capacity. In the context of growing","airport congestion and the limited","development of major new airport","infrastructure, the slots are a rare resource.","Access to such resources is of crucial","importance for the provision of air","transport services and for the maintenance","of effective competition. To this end, the","allocation and use of slots could be made","more effective by introducing market","mechanisms, by ensuring that the unused","slots are made available to interested","operators as soon as possible and in a","transparent manner, and by reinforcing the","underlying principles of the system with","regard to the allocation, management and","use of the slots. At the same time,","although the historical slots meet the need","for stability in schedules for the airlines,","during the future assessment of the","application of this Regulation, a gradual","introduction of other market mechanisms","could be envisaged, such as withdrawing","and auctioning historical slots."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"47","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-48","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Recital 6"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:40"},"new":["(6) The allocation of slots at congested","airports must continue to be based on","neutral, transparent and non-discriminatory","rules."],"old":["(6) The allocation of slots at congested","airports should continue to be based on","neutral, transparent and non-discriminatory","","rules."],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"48","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Christine De Veyrac, Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-49","justification":"There is no justification whatsoever given for the introduction of secondary trading at a\nEuropean level. The necessary guarantees for a market open to genuine competition have not\nbeen provided. A monetisation of trading is no answer to the issue of the congestion of the\nEU\u2019s airports.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 7"]],"meps":[4347,97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:40"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["(7) The current slot allocation system","should be adapted to the development of","the market mechanisms used in certain","airports for transferring or exchanging","slots. In its Communication to the","European Parliament, the Council, the","European Economic and Social","Committee and the Committee of the","Regions on the application of Regulation","No 95/93 on common rules for the","allocation of slots at Community airports,","the Commission undertook to make an","appropriate proposal if it became","apparent that revision of the existing","legislation was required for competition","or other reasons."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"49","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Dominique Riquet","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-50","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 8"]],"meps":[96885],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:40"},"new":["(8) Experience has shown that secondary","trading, that is the exchange of slots for","financial or other compensation, does not","benefit from a uniform and consistent","legislative framework, including","guarantees of transparency and competitive","safeguards. It is therefore necessary to","regulate the exchange of slots and prohibit","secondary trading in slots in the European","Union."],"old":["(8) Experience has shown that secondary","trading, that is the exchange of slots for","financial or other compensation, does not","benefit from a uniform and consistent","legislative framework, including","guarantees of transparency and competitive","safeguards. It is therefore necessary to","regulate secondary trading in slots in the","European Union."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"50","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Christine De Veyrac, Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-51","justification":" This recital provides not justification whatsoever for the introduction of secondary trading at\n a European level. The necessary guarantees for a market open to genuine competition have\n not been provided. A monetisation of trading is no answer to the issue of the congestion of the\n EU\u2019s airports.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Recital 8"]],"meps":[4347,97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:41"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["(8) Experience has shown that secondary","trading, that is the exchange of slots for","financial or other compensation, does not","benefit from a uniform and consistent","legislative framework, including","guarantees of transparency and","competitive safeguards. It is therefore","necessary to regulate secondary trading in","slots in the European Union."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"51","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"James Nicholson","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-52","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 12"]],"meps":[1318],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:41"},"new":["(12) Situations where, owing to a lack of","available slots, the benefits of liberalisation","are unevenly spread and competition is","distorted should also be avoided. In such","situations provision should be made for","Member State intervention."],"old":["(12) Situations where, owing to a lack of","available slots, the benefits of liberalisation","are unevenly spread and competition is","distorted, should also be avoided."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"52","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-53","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 12"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:41"},"new":["(12) Situations where, owing to a lack of","available slots, the benefits of liberalisation","are unevenly spread and competition is","distorted, need also to be avoided ."],"old":["(12) Situations where, owing to a lack of","available slots, the benefits of liberalisation","are unevenly spread and competition is","distorted, should also be avoided ."],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"53","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-54","justification":" Non-scheduled air transportation plays a role in providing links to and from the less\n accessible regions of Europe and thus contributes to their development and this needs to be\n recognised.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 12 a (new)"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:41"},"new":["(12a) Non-scheduled air transportation","contributes to regional cohesion and","competitiveness. Where air carriers have","regularly used slots for such","transportation at an airport falling within","the scope of this regulation, even where","these slots do not always involve the same","routes, priority should be given to requests","for continued usage of such slots."],"old":[""],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"54","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Michael Gahler, Markus Ferber","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-55","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Recital 13"]],"meps":[2341,1917],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:41"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["(13) The progress made in implementing","the Single European Sky has a major","impact on the slot allocation process. The","imposition of performance plans, which","make the airports, the air navigation","service providers and airspace users","subject to performance improvement and","monitoring measures, and the network","management function, based on the","establishment of a European network of","routes and a central air traffic","management, means it is necessary to","update the slot allocation rules. It is","therefore necessary to create an adequate","framework allowing the network","manager, the performance review body","and the national supervisory authorities to","participate in the procedure of setting the","airport capacity and coordination","parameters. A new category of airports of","importance to this network should also be","created with a view to allowing the","network to react better in crisis situations."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"55","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-56","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 13"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:41"},"new":["(13) The progress made in implementing","the Single European Sky has a major","impact on the slot allocation process. The","imposition of performance plans, which","make the airports, the air navigation","service providers and airspace users subject","to performance improvement and","monitoring measures, and the network","management function, based on the","establishment of a European network of","routes and a central air traffic management,","means it is necessary to update the slot","allocation rules. It is therefore necessary to","create an adequate framework allowing the","network manager, the performance","evaluation body and the national","supervisory authorities to participate in the","procedure of setting the airport capacity","and coordination parameters. To that end","an inter-airport information exchange","system should be introduced between","airports with no designation or","coordinators and the coordinators","themselves in order to enhance air traffic","management and planning."],"old":["(13) The progress made in implementing","the Single European Sky has a major","impact on the slot allocation process. The","imposition of performance plans, which","make the airports, the air navigation","service providers and airspace users subject","to performance improvement and","monitoring measures, and the network","management function, based on the","establishment of a European network of","routes and a central air traffic management,","means it is necessary to update the slot","allocation rules. It is therefore necessary to","create an adequate framework allowing the","network manager, the performance","evaluation body and the national","supervisory authorities to participate in the","procedure of setting the airport capacity","and coordination parameters. A new","category of airports of interest for this","network should also be created with a","view to allowing the network to react","better in crisis situations."],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"56","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-57","justification":" There is no need to create a new category of airports in addition to coordinated and\n schedules facilitated airports.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 13"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:41"},"new":["(13) The progress made in implementing","the Single European Sky has a major","impact on the slot allocation process. The","imposition of performance plans, which","make the airports, the air navigation","service providers and airspace users subject","to performance improvement and","monitoring measures, and the network","management function, based on the","establishment of a European network of","routes and a central air traffic management,","means it is necessary to update the slot","allocation rules. It is therefore necessary to","create an adequate framework allowing the","network manager, the performance review","body and the national supervisory","authorities to participate in the procedure","of setting the airport capacity and","coordination parameters."],"old":["(13) The progress made in implementing","the Single European Sky has a major","impact on the slot allocation process. The","imposition of performance plans, which","make the airports, the air navigation","service providers and airspace users subject","to performance improvement and","monitoring measures, and the network","management function, based on the","establishment of a European network of","routes and a central air traffic management,","means it is necessary to update the slot","allocation rules. It is therefore necessary to","create an adequate framework allowing the","network manager, the performance rewiew","body and the national supervisory","authorities to participate in the procedure","of setting the airport capacity and","coordination parameters. A new category","of airports of importance to this network","should also be created with a view to","allowing the network to react better in","crisis situations."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"57","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" James Nicholson","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-58","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Recital 14"]],"meps":[1318],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:41"},"new":["(14) The flight plans and the slots should","be better matched to better exploit airport","capacity and improve flight punctuality","insofar as this does not restrict access to","hub airports from regional airports."],"old":["(14) The flight plans and the slots should","be better matched to better exploit airport","capacity and improve flight punctuality.","",""],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"58","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian, Michael Gahler","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-59","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 14"]],"meps":[96810,96733,2341],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:41"},"new":["(14) The flight plans and the slots should","be better matched to better exploit airport","capacity and improve flight punctuality.","The flight plans can be rejected in a \"no","slot\" situation."],"old":["(14) The flight plans and the slots should","be better matched to better exploit airport","capacity and improve flight punctuality."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"59","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Christine De Veyrac, Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-60","justification":" It would seem useful, with a view to creating the position of European coordinator, to clarify\n and strengthen the role of the coordinators and schedules facilitators. In addition, better\n interaction between those players will smooth the way for the establishing of a\n European-scale coordinator.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 15"]],"meps":[4347,97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:41"},"new":["(15) The Member State responsible for the","schedules facilitated or coordinated airport","should ensure the appointment of a","schedules facilitator or a coordinator","whose neutrality should be unquestioned.","To this end, the coordinators' role and that","of the schedules facilitators should be","enhanced. Provision should be made for","the legal, organisational, decision-making","and financial independence of the","coordinators with regard to stakeholders,","the Member State and bodies subordinate","to that State. To prevent the coordinator's","activity and that of the schedules","facilitator suffering from a lack of","financial, technical or human resources or","expertise, Member States should ensure","that the coordinators have all the resources","needed for their work."],"old":["(15) The Member State responsible for the","schedules facilitated or coordinated airport","should ensure the appointment of a","schedules facilitator or a coordinator","whose neutrality should be unquestioned.","To this end, the coordinators' role should","be enhanced. Provision should be made for","the legal, organisational, decision-making","and financial independence of the","coordinators with regard to stakeholders,","the Member State and bodies subordinate","to that State. To prevent the coordinator's","activity suffering from a lack of financial,","technical or human resources or expertise,","Member States should ensure that the","","coordinators have all the resources needed","for their work."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"60","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-61","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Recital 16"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:41"},"new":["(16) Additional obligations should be","introduced for air carriers with regard to","sending information to the coordinators.","Provision should be made for additional","penalties for omitting information or","sending false or misleading information.","For airports with no specific designation,","the air carriers should have the obligation","to communicate their flight intentions or","other relevant information requested by the","coordinator or schedules facilitator."],"old":["(16) Additional obligations should be","introduced for air carriers with regard to","sending information to the coordinators.","Provision should be made for additional","penalties for omitting information or","sending false or misleading information.","For network airports, the air carriers should","have the obligation to communicate their","flight intentions or other relevant","information requested by the coordinator or","schedules facilitator."],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"61","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Christine De Veyrac, Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-62","justification":"It would seem useful, with a view to creating the position of European coordinator, to clarify\nand strengthen the role of the coordinators and schedules facilitators. In addition, better\ninteraction between those players will smooth the way for the establishing of a\nEuropean-scale coordinator.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Recital 16"]],"meps":[4347,97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:41"},"new":["(16) Additional obligations should be","introduced for air carriers with regard to","sending information to the coordinators","and schedules facilitators. Provision","should be made for additional penalties for","omitting information or sending false or","misleading information. For network","airports, the air carriers should have the","obligation to communicate their flight","intentions or other relevant information","requested by the coordinator or schedules","facilitator."],"old":["(16) Additional obligations should be","introduced for air carriers with regard to","sending information to the coordinators.","Provision should be made for additional","penalties for omitting information or","sending false or misleading information.","For network airports, the air carriers should","have the obligation to communicate their","flight intentions or other relevant","information requested by the coordinator or","schedules facilitator."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"62","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-63","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 17"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:41"},"new":["(17) The Union should facilitate","cooperation between the coordinators and","schedules facilitators to allow them to","exchange best practices with a view to the","establishment of a European coordinator at","the earliest opportunity and in line with","the implementation of a Single European","Sky."],"old":["(17) The Union should facilitate","cooperation between the coordinators and","schedules facilitators to allow them to","exchange best practices with a view to the","establishment of a European coordinator in","due course."],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"63","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-64","justification":" The Commission's proposal introduces a new concept of a European coordinator, which is\n not defined anywhere and makes this provision extremely unclear. It will be a bureaucratic,\n expensive and unnecessary body. Therefore, it should be deleted.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Recital 17"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:41"},"new":["(17) The Union should facilitate","cooperation between the coordinators and","schedules facilitators to allow them to","exchange best practices."],"old":["(17) The Union should facilitate","cooperation between the coordinators and","schedules facilitators to allow them to","exchange best practices with a view to the","establishment of a European coordinator","in due course."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"64","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-65","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Recital 21"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:41"},"new":["(21) The period of validity for a series of","slots should be limited to the schedule","planning period for which the series is","granted. The priority for allocating a series","of slots, even historical slots, should come","from the allocation or confirmation by the","coordinator and should be based on","compliance with all the rules under this","Regulation governing slot allocation and","enabling that slot allocation to continue","into the next scheduling season."],"old":["(21) The period of validity for a series of","slots should be limited to the schedule","planning period for which the series is","granted. The priority for allocating a series","of slots, even historical slots, should come","from the allocation or confirmation by the","coordinator."],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"65","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-66","justification":"The historical rights are not obtained from the allocation but from the previous use of slots\naccording to the Regulation. The coordinator should only execute the legally defined rules.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 21"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:42"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["(21) The period of validity for a series of","slots should be limited to the schedule","planning period for which the series is","granted. The priority for allocating a","series of slots, even historical slots, should","come from the allocation or confirmation","by the coordinator."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"66","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"James Nicholson","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-67","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 22"]],"meps":[1318],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:42"},"new":["(22) It is necessary to retain special","provisions, such as PSOs imposed on","routes between regional and hub airports,","for the maintenance of adequate domestic","air services within a Member State."],"old":["(22) It is necessary to retain special","provisions, under limited circumstances,","for the maintenance of adequate domestic","air services to regions of the Member State","or Member States concerned when a","public service obligation has been","imposed."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"67","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Dominique Riquet, Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-68","justification":" Local rules offer a worthwhile means of flexibility and responsiveness which the Commission\n should continue to handle so that it can ensure overall consistency.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Recital 23"]],"meps":[96885,97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:42"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["(23) Since the environmental aspects may","be taken into account in the coordination","parameters and regional connectivity can","also be fully ensured in the context of the","public service obligations, experience has","not shown that local rules are useful.","Furthermore, it cannot be excluded that","such rules do not lead to discrimination in","allocating slots. Consequently, the option","of resorting to local rules should be","restricted. All the technical, operational,","performance and environmental","constraints that should be applied by the","coordinators or the facilitators should be","defined in the coordination parameters.","The resort to local rules would also be","reduced to supervising the use of slots and","the possibility of reducing the length of","the series of slots in the cases provided for","by this Regulation. With a view to","promoting better use of airport capacity,","two basic principles in slot allocation","should be reinforced, namely the","definition of the series of slots and the","calculation of historical slots. At the same","time, the flexibility given to air carriers","should be better regulated with a view to","preventing distortions during the","application of this Regulation in the","Member States. Therefore, better use of","airport capacity should be encouraged."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"68","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Eva Lichtenberger","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-69","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 23"]],"meps":[28253],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:42"},"new":["(23) Since the environmental aspects may","be taken into account in the coordination","parameters and regional connectivity can","also be fully ensured in the context of the","public service obligations, experience has","not demonstrated the usefulness of local","rules. Furthermore, it cannot be excluded","that such rules do not lead to","discrimination in allocating slots.","Consequently, the option of resorting to","local rules should be restricted. All the","technical, operational, performance and","environmental constraints that should be","applied by the coordinators or the","facilitators should be defined in the","coordination parameters. Recourse to local","rules would also be reduced to monitoring","the use of slots and the possibility of","reducing the length of the series of slots in","the cases provided for by this Regulation.","With a view to promoting better use of","airport capacity, two basic principles in slot","allocation should be reinforced, namely the","definition of a series of slots and the","calculation of historical slots. At the same","time, the flexibility given to air carriers","should be better regulated with a view to","preventing distortions in the application of","this Regulation in the Member States.","Therefore, better use of airport capacity","should be encouraged. The integration of","air and rail tickets for shorter rail","connections between airports shall be","supported."],"old":["(23) Since the environmental aspects may","be taken into account in the coordination","parameters and regional connectivity can","also be fully ensured in the context of the","public service obligations, experience has","not demonstrated the usefulness of local","rules. Furthermore, it cannot be excluded","that such rules do not lead to","discrimination in allocating slots.","Consequently, the option of resorting to","local rules should be restricted. All the","technical, operational, performance and","environmental constraints that should be","applied by the coordinators or the","facilitators should be defined in the","coordination parameters. Recourse to local","rules would also be reduced to monitoring","the use of slots and the possibility of","reducing the length of the series of slots in","the cases provided for by this Regulation.","With a view to promoting better use of","airport capacity, two basic principles in slot","allocation should be reinforced, namely the","definition of a series of slots and the","calculation of historical slots. At the same","time, the flexibility given to air carriers","should be better regulated with a view to","preventing distortions in the application of","this Regulation in the Member States.","Therefore, better use of airport capacity","should be encouraged."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"69","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-70","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Recital 23"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:42"},"new":["(23) Since the environmental aspects may","be taken into account in the coordination","parameters and regional connectivity can","also be fully ensured in the context of the","public service obligations, experience has","not shown that local rules are useful.","Furthermore, it cannot be excluded that","such rules do not lead to discrimination in","allocating slots. Consequently, the option","of resorting to local rules should be","restricted. All the technical, operational,","performance and environmental constraints","that should be applied by the coordinators","or the facilitators should be defined in the","coordination parameters. The resort to","local rules would also be reduced to","supervising the use of slots and the","possibility of increasing the length of the","series of slots in the cases provided for by","this Regulation. With a view to promoting","better use of airport capacity, two basic","principles in slot allocation should be","reinforced, namely the definition of the","series of slots and the calculation of","historical slots. At the same time, the","flexibility given to air carriers should be","better regulated with a view to preventing","distortions during the application of this","Regulation in the Member States.","Therefore, better use of airport capacity","should be encouraged."],"old":["(23) Since the environmental aspects may","be taken into account in the coordination","parameters and regional connectivity can","also be fully ensured in the context of the","public service obligations, experience has","not shown that local rules are useful.","Furthermore, it cannot be excluded that","such rules do not lead to discrimination in","allocating slots. Consequently, the option","of resorting to local rules should be","restricted. All the technical, operational,","performance and environmental constraints","that should be applied by the coordinators","or the facilitators should be defined in the","coordination parameters. The resort to","local rules would also be reduced to","supervising the use of slots and the","possibility of reducing the length of the","series of slots in the cases provided for by","this Regulation. With a view to promoting","better use of airport capacity, two basic","principles in slot allocation should be","reinforced, namely the definition of the","series of slots and the calculation of","historical slots. At the same time, the","flexibility given to air carriers should be","better regulated with a view to preventing","distortions during the application of this","Regulation in the Member States.","Therefore, better use of airport capacity","should be encouraged."],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"70","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Christine De Veyrac","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-71","justification":"Applying local guidelines enables the specific needs of airports to be satisfied and hence\nmaximises infrastructure capacity use in the most efficient manner possible. Besides this,\nalthough it would be preferable to maintain the length of five-slot series, these should be\nextendable in order to enable a response to local traffic characteristics.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 23"]],"meps":[4347],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:42"},"new":["(23) With a view to promoting better use of","airport capacity, two basic principles in slot","allocation should be reinforced, namely the","definition of the series of slots and the","calculation of historical slots. At the same","time, the flexibility given to air carriers","should be better regulated with a view to","preventing distortions during the","application of this Regulation in the","Member States. Therefore, better use of","airport capacity should be encouraged."],"old":["(23) Since the environmental aspects may","be taken into account in the coordination","parameters and regional connectivity can","also be fully ensured in the context of the","public service obligations, experience has","not shown that local rules are useful.","Furthermore, it cannot be excluded that","such rules do not lead to discrimination in","allocating slots. Consequently, the option","of resorting to local rules should be","restricted. All the technical, operational,","performance and environmental","constraints that should be applied by the","coordinators or the facilitators should be","defined in the coordination parameters.","The resort to local rules would also be","reduced to supervising the use of slots and","the possibility of reducing the length of","the series of slots in the cases provided for","by this Regulation. With a view to","promoting better use of airport capacity,","two basic principles in slot allocation","should be reinforced, namely the definition","of the series of slots and the calculation of","historical slots. At the same time, the","flexibility given to air carriers should be","better regulated with a view to preventing","distortions during the application of this","Regulation in the Member States.","Therefore, better use of airport capacity","should be encouraged."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"71","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Eva Lichtenberger","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-72","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Recital 23 a (new)"]],"meps":[28253],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:42"},"new":["(23a) Auctioning slots in a framework of","environmental criteria should be proposed","by the Commission."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"72","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Petra Kammerevert","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-73","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Recital 24"]],"meps":[96837],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:42"},"new":["(24) To allow air carriers to adapt to","imperative situations of urgency, such as a","marked decline in traffic or an economic","crisis that severely affects the activity of air","carriers, affecting a lager part of the","scheduling period, the Commission should","be allowed to adopt urgent measures to","ensure the consistency of measures to be","taken at coordinated airports. These","measures will allow air carriers to retain","priority in allocating the same series for the","following scheduling period even if the","80% rate has not been met."],"old":["(24) To allow air carriers to adapt to","imperative situations of urgency, such as a","marked decline in traffic or an economic","crisis that severely affects the activity of air","carriers, affecting a lager part of the","scheduling period, the Commission should","be allowed to adopt urgent measures to","ensure the consistency of measures to be","taken at coordinated airports. These","measures will allow air carriers to retain","priority in allocating the same series for the","following scheduling period even if the","85% rate has not been met."],"orig_lang":"de","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"73","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Vilja Savisaar-Toomast","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-74","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Recital 24"]],"meps":[97308],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:42"},"new":["(24) To allow air carriers to adapt to","imperative situations of urgency, such as a","marked decline in traffic or an economic","crisis that severely affects the activity of air","carriers, affecting a lager part of the","scheduling period, the Commission should","be allowed to adopt urgent measures to","ensure the consistency of measures to be","taken at coordinated airports. These","measures will allow air carriers to retain","priority in allocating the same series for the","following scheduling period even if the","80% rate has not been met."],"old":["(24) To allow air carriers to adapt to","imperative situations of urgency, such as a","marked decline in traffic or an economic","crisis that severely affects the activity of air","carriers, affecting a lager part of the","scheduling period, the Commission should","be allowed to adopt urgent measures to","ensure the consistency of measures to be","taken at coordinated airports. These","measures will allow air carriers to retain","priority in allocating the same series for the","following scheduling period even if the","85% rate has not been met."],"orig_lang":"et","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"74","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"James Nicholson","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-75","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 24"]],"meps":[1318],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:42"},"new":["(24) To allow air carriers to adapt to","imperative situations of urgency, such as a","marked decline in traffic or an economic","crisis that severely affects the activity of air","carriers, affecting a lager part of the","scheduling period, Member States should","be allowed to adopt urgent measures to","ensure the consistency of measures to be","taken at coordinated airports. These","measures will allow air carriers to retain","priority in allocating the same series for","the following scheduling period even if the","85% rate has not been met."],"old":["(24) To allow air carriers to adapt to","imperative situations of urgency, such as a","marked decline in traffic or an economic","crisis that severely affects the activity of air","carriers, affecting a lager part of the","scheduling period, the Commission should","be allowed to adopt urgent measures to","ensure the consistency of measures to be","taken at coordinated airports. These","measures will allow air carriers to retain","priority for the allocation of the same","series for the following scheduling period","even if the 85% rate has not been met."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"75","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-76","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Recital 24"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:42"},"new":["(24) To allow air carriers to adapt to","imperative situations of urgency, such as a","marked decline in traffic or an economic","crisis that severely affects the activity of air","carriers, affecting a lager part of the","scheduling period, the Commission should","be allowed to adopt urgent measures to","ensure the consistency of measures to be","taken at coordinated airports. These","measures will allow the Commission to","lower the time slot use threshold to under","85%, thereby enabling air carriers to retain","priority in allocating the same series for the","scheduling period following that in which","they reach the aforesaid threshold."],"old":["(24) To allow air carriers to adapt to","imperative situations of urgency, such as a","marked decline in traffic or an economic","crisis that severely affects the activity of air","carriers, affecting a lager part of the","scheduling period, the Commission should","be allowed to adopt urgent measures to","ensure the consistency of measures to be","taken at coordinated airports. These","measures will allow air carriers to retain","priority in allocating the same series for the","following scheduling period even if the","85% rate has not been met."],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"76","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Dominique Riquet","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-77","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Recital 24"]],"meps":[96885],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:42"},"new":["(24) To allow air carriers to adapt to","imperative situations of urgency, such as a","marked decline in traffic or an economic","crisis that severely affects the activity of air","carriers, affecting a lager part of the","scheduling period, the Commission should","be allowed to adopt urgent measures to","ensure the consistency of measures to be","taken at coordinated airports. These","measures will allow air carriers to retain","priority in allocating the same series for the","following scheduling period even if the","80% rate has not been met."],"old":["(24) To allow air carriers to adapt to","imperative situations of urgency, such as a","marked decline in traffic or an economic","crisis that severely affects the activity of air","carriers, affecting a lager part of the","scheduling period, the Commission should","be allowed to adopt urgent measures to","ensure the consistency of measures to be","taken at coordinated airports. These","measures will allow air carriers to retain","priority in allocating the same series for the","following scheduling period even if the","","85% rate has not been met."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"77","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Christine De Veyrac, Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-78","justification":"Raising the slot series usage rate to 85% seems excessive and is not an appropriate answer to\ncongestion problems. This rate would also lead to carriers \u2018flying empty\u2019 in order not to lose\ntheir series allocation, which is hardly in keeping with the overriding need to address the\nenvironmental impact of this mode of transport. The rate would therefore seem to be of little\neconomic or environmental benefit. An 80-20 ratio should therefore be maintained for series\nusage rates.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 24"]],"meps":[4347,97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:42"},"new":["(24) To allow air carriers to adapt to","imperative situations of urgency, such as a","marked decline in traffic or an economic","crisis that severely affects the activity of air","carriers, affecting a lager part of the","scheduling period, the Commission should","be allowed to adopt urgent measures to","ensure the consistency of measures to be","taken at coordinated airports. These","measures will allow air carriers to retain","priority in allocating the same series for the","following scheduling period even if the","80% rate has not been met."],"old":["(24) To allow air carriers to adapt to","imperative situations of urgency, such as a","marked decline in traffic or an economic","crisis that severely affects the activity of air","carriers, affecting a lager part of the","scheduling period, the Commission should","be allowed to adopt urgent measures to","ensure the consistency of measures to be","taken at coordinated airports. These","measures will allow air carriers to retain","priority in allocating the same series for the","following scheduling period even if the","85% rate has not been met."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"78","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Michael Gahler, Corien Wortmann-Kool","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-79","justification":" The change of the globally accepted Use-it or Lose-it rule of 80-20 to the proposed 85-15 will\n deprive air carriers of the ability to cope with unforeseen events outside their control\n (weather, ATC delays, technical problems, etc.) which can force them to cancel flights. It is\n advisable to keep the status quo on this aspect.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 24"]],"meps":[96810,96733,28393,2341,28167],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:42"},"new":["(24) To allow air carriers to adapt to","imperative situations of urgency, such as a","marked decline in traffic or an economic","crisis that severely affects the activity of air","carriers, affecting a larger part of the","scheduling period, the Commission should","be allowed to adopt urgent measures to","ensure the consistency of measures to be","taken at coordinated airports. These","measures will allow air carriers to retain","priority in allocating the same series for","the following scheduling period even if the","80% rate has not been met."],"old":["(24) To allow air carriers to adapt to","imperative situations of urgency, such as a","marked decline in traffic or an economic","crisis that severely affects the activity of air","carriers, affecting a lager part of the","scheduling period, the Commission should","be allowed to adopt urgent measures to","ensure the consistency of measures to be","taken at coordinated airports. These","measures will allow air carriers to retain","priority for the allocation of the same","series for the following scheduling period","even if the 85% rate has not been met."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"79","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" In\u00e9s Ayala Sender","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-80","justification":"Amendment taking over the wording the rapporteur uses in the report (Amendment 12), and\nincluding charter flights as well as business flights, to which the same slot allocation issues\napply.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Recital 24 a (new)"]],"meps":[28292],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:43"},"new":["(24a) This Regulation should allow for","the flexibility requirements of business","aviation and of charter flights so as to","enable non-scheduled flights to be","operated, especially in view of the fact","that the operators concerned cannot build","up a slot portfolio based on historical","rights."],"orig_lang":"es","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"80","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Michael Gahler, Markus Ferber","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-81","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 25"]],"meps":[2341,1917],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:43"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["(25) The role of the coordination","committee should be strengthened in two","ways. On the one hand, the network","manager, the performance review body","and the national supervisory authority","should be invited to follow the","committee's meetings. On the other hand,","the coordination committee's tasks could","include making suggestions or giving","advice to the coordinator and/or Member","State on any issue concerning the airport","capacity, in particular in relation to the","implementation of the Single European","Sky and the working of the European Air","Traffic Management Network. The","committee should also be able to provide","the performance review body and the","national supervisory authority with","opinions concerning the link between the","coordination parameters and the key","performance indicators proposed to the","air navigation service providers."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"81","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-82","justification":" An ex-ante penalty system would create barriers to entering the market, which could\n undermine the competitiveness of European airline companies as a whole. This ex-ante\n system is a new cash outgoing that would penalise indiscriminately all air carriers \u2013\n including those that comply with the rules. The focus should be on an ex-post system targeting\n airline companies that do not play fair.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 26"]],"meps":[97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:43"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["(26) Experience shows that a significant","number of slots are returned to the pool","too late to be reallocated effectively. The","airport managing body should be","encouraged to use the airport charge","system to discourage this type of","behaviour. Despite having recourse to this","mechanism, the airport managing body","should not, however, discourage air","carriers from entering the market or","developing services."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"82","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-83","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Recital 26"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:43"},"new":["(26) Experience shows that a significant","number of slots are returned to the pool too","late to be reallocated effectively. The","airport managing body should be","encouraged to use financial charging","schemes and significantly strengthen the","current penalty system in order to","dissuade air carriers from such practices.","Despite having recourse to these","mechanisms, the airport managing body","should not, however, discourage air","carriers from entering the market or","developing services."],"old":["(26) Experience shows that a significant","number of slots are returned to the pool too","late to be reallocated effectively. The","airport managing body should be","encouraged to use the airport charge","system to discourage this type of","behaviour. Despite having recourse to this","mechanism, the airport managing body","should not, however, discourage air","carriers from entering the market or","developing services.","",""],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"83","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Dominique Riquet","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-84","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 26"]],"meps":[96885],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:43"},"new":["(26) Experience shows that a significant","number of slots are returned to the pool too","late to be reallocated effectively. Penalty","mechanisms should be introduced to","discourage this type of behaviour. Despite","having recourse to these mechanisms, the","airport managing body should not,","however, discourage air carriers from","entering the market or developing services."],"old":["(26) Experience shows that a significant","number of slots are returned to the pool too","late to be reallocated effectively. The","airport managing body should be","encouraged to use the airport charge","system to discourage this type of","behaviour. Despite having recourse to this","mechanism, the airport managing body","should not, however, discourage air","carriers from entering the market or","developing services."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"84","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Christine De Veyrac","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-85","justification":" Its seems disproportionate to impose additional penalties for the late return of unused slots.\n It would seem to be sufficient to simply reinforce the ex-post penalty system provided for in\n Article 18 of the proposal. Introducing an administrative procedure of this type to create an\n ex-ante penalty would make things unnecessarily complicated for all the players involved. In\n addition to this, it seems difficult to assess what costs airports might be liable to incur.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 26"]],"meps":[4347],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:43"},"new":["(26) Experience shows that a significant","number of slots are returned to the pool too","late to be reallocated effectively. Better","application of the current ex-post","penalties should be encouraged in order to","stop airline companies adopting this type","of behaviour."],"old":["(26) Experience shows that a significant","number of slots are returned to the pool too","late to be reallocated effectively. The","airport managing body should be","encouraged to use the airport charge","system to discourage this type of","behaviour. Despite having recourse to this","mechanism, the airport managing body","should not, however, discourage air","carriers from entering the market or","","developing services."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"85","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" In\u00e9s Ayala Sender","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-86","justification":" This amendment emphasises, via a new recital, the possibility introduced by the rapporteur of\n the proceeds of time slot trading being used to improving and increasing airport capacities.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Recital 26 a (new)"]],"meps":[28292],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:43"},"new":["(26a) In order to increase airport","capacity, the Regulation should cover the","possibility of Member States being able to","use the proceeds of the sale of time slots","following secondary trading for the","purpose of optimising air traffic and","developing new infrastructure."],"orig_lang":"es","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"86","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-87","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Recital 28"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:43"},"new":["(28) The application of the provisions of","this Regulation must be without prejudice","to the competition rules of the Treaty, in","particular Articles 101 , 102 and 106 ."],"old":["(28) The application of the provisions of","this Regulation should be without","prejudice to the competition rules of the","Treaty, in particular Articles 101 , 102 and","106 ."],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"87","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Artur Zasada, Bogdan Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-88","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 30"]],"meps":[96778,96792],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:43"},"new":["(30) In order to ensure uniform","conditions for the implementation of this","Regulation, implementing powers should","be conferred on the Commission. Those","powers should be exercised in accordance","with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the","European Parliament and of the Council","of 16 February 2011 laying down the","rules and general principles concerning","mechanisms for control by the Member","States of the Commission's exercise of","implementing powers."],"old":["(30) The power to adopt delegated acts","should be delegated to the Commission, in","accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty","on the Functioning of the European","Union, in order to lay down the methods","for developing a study on capacity and","demand. It is of particular importance","that the Commission carry out","appropriate consultations during its","preparatory work, including at expert","level."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"88","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-89","justification":" The Commission's proposal introduces a new concept of a European coordinator, which is\n not defined anywhere and makes this provision extremely unclear. It will be a bureaucratic,\n expensive and unnecessary body. Therefore, it should be deleted.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 33"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:43"},"new":["(33) The examination procedure should be","used for the adoption of implementing","instruments concerning, the template for","the coordinator and schedules facilitator's","annual activity report and the decision that","one or more Member States should take","measures with a view to remedying a third","country's discriminatory behaviour with","regard to the Union's air carriers."],"old":["(33) The examination procedure should be","used for the adoption of implementing","","instruments concerning the creation of a","European coordinator, the template for","the coordinator and schedules facilitator's","annual activity report and the decision that","one or more Member States should take","measures with a view to remedying a third","country's discriminatory behaviour with","regard to the Union's air carriers."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"89","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Dominique Vlasto","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-90","justification":" The arrangements for \u2018new entrants\u2019 are designed to spur free and fair competition on the\n European market. Laying down a special rule on the maximum number of time slots that must\n be held in order to enjoy the status of \u2018new entrant\u2019 would favour certain carriers. In order\n to prevent this distortion of competition, one single rule should be applied, regardless of\n whether the flights are on European or international routes.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 2 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 2 \u2013 point a"]],"meps":[5737],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:43"},"new":["a) an air carrier requesting, as part of a","series of slots, a slot at an airport on any","day, where, if the carrier's request were","accepted, it would in total hold fewer than","nine slots at that airport on that day; or"],"old":["a) an air carrier requesting, as part of a","series of slots, a slot at an airport on any","day, where, if the carrier's request were","accepted, it would in total hold fewer than","five slots at that airport on that day; or"],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"90","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-91","justification":"The maximum number of slots held by a new entrant at an airport or on a European route\nshould be the same. Keeping it to five here while bringing the maximum number of slots to\nnine on an intra-European route (as in Article 2 paragraph 2 b/) would be a discrimination\nfor non-European carriers in gaining New Entrant status.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 2 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 2 \u2013 point a"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:43"},"new":["a) an air carrier requesting, as part of a","series of slots, a slot at an airport on any","day, where, if the carrier's request were","accepted, it would in total hold fewer than","nine slots at that airport on that day; or"],"old":["a) an air carrier requesting, as part of a","series of slots, a slot at an airport on any","day, where, if the carrier's request were","accepted, it would in total hold fewer than","five slots at that airport on that day; or"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"91","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Dominique Vlasto","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-92","justification":" The arrangements for \u2018new entrants\u2019 are designed to spur free and fair competition on the\n European market. Laying down a special rule on the maximum number of time slots that must\n be held in order to enjoy the status of \u2018new entrant\u2019 would favour certain carriers. In order\n to prevent this distortion of competition, one single rule should be applied, regardless of\n whether the flights are on European or international routes.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 2 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 2 \u2013 point b \u2013 introductory part"]],"meps":[5737],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:43"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["b) an air carrier requesting a series of","slots for a non-stop scheduled passenger","service between two European Union","airports, where at most two other air","carriers operate the same non-stop","scheduled service between those airports","on that day, and where, if the air carrier's","request were accepted, the air carrier","would nonetheless hold fewer than nine","slots at that airport on that day for that","non-stop service."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"92","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-93","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 2 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 3"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:43"},"new":["3) 'scheduling period' shall mean either the","summer or winter season as used in the","schedules of air carriers, in accordance","with the rules and guidelines established by","the air transport sector on a global basis;"],"old":["3) \u2018scheduling period\u2019 shall mean either the","summer or winter season as used in the","schedules of air carriers , in accordance","with the rules and guidelines established by","the air transport section on a global basis ;"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"93","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-94","justification":" It is essential that non-scheduled and business aviation operators are able to benefit from the\n\nsame opportunities offered by the new rules as scheduled operators.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 2 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 6"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:44"},"new":["6) 'Group of air carriers' shall mean two or","more air carriers which together perform","joint operations, franchise operations,","code-sharing, or a consortium in the case","of non-scheduled operators for the","purpose of utilising a specific slot;"],"old":["6) \u2018group of air carriers\u2019 shall mean two or","more air carriers which together perform","joint operations, franchise operations or","code-sharing for the purpose of operating","a specific air service;"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"94","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-95","justification":"The concept of a network airport is unnecessary and inappropriate within the Slot Regulation.\nThe purpose of the Slot Regulation is to manage the allocation of slots at congested airports,\nwhereas the Network Airport concept introduces undefined data reporting requirements\n(administrative burdens) for uncongested airports that are not subject to slot coordination or\nschedules facilitation.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 2 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 9"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:44"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["9) \u2018airport belonging to the network\u2019 shall","mean an airport which is not confronted","with congestion problems but which, in","the event of a sudden and significant","increase in traffic or in the event of a","sudden and significant reduction of its","capacity, could have an impact on the","functioning of the European air-traffic","management network (hereinafter \u2018the","network\u2019), in accordance with Article 6 of","Regulation (EC) No 551/2004 of the","European Parliament and of the Council;"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"95","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-96","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 2 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 9"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:44"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["9) 'network airport' shall mean an airport","which is not confronted with congestion","problems but which, in the event of a","","sudden and significant increase in traffic","or in the event of a sudden and significant","reduction of its capacity, could have an","impact on the functioning of the","European air-traffic management","network (hereinafter 'the network'), in","accordance with Article 6 of Regulation","(EC) No 551/2004 of the European","Parliament and of the Council;"],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"96","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Debora Serracchiani","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-97","justification":" The standard should be 15 slots out of which 5 are consecutive for the summer season and 10\n slots for the winter season. Any deviation from this standard could be discussed amongst\n members of the airport\u2019s coordination committee and addressed through a local rule. This\n would provide flexibility for the specific needs of the individual airlines and airports. This\n would fully support the principle of making the best use of existing capacity.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 2 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 13"]],"meps":[96865],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:44"},"new":["13) For the summer scheduling period a","\"Series of slots\" shall mean at least 15","slots of which at least 5 shall be","consecutive unless agreed otherwise","through a local rule. For the winter","scheduling period a \"series of slots\" shall","mean at least 10 slots of which at least 5","shall be consecutive unless agreed","otherwise through a local rule. The slot","allocated by the coordinator shall be on the","basis that it is on the same time of the day","and the same day of the week,"],"old":["13) \u2018series of slots\u2019 shall mean at least 15","slots for a summer scheduling period and","10 slots for a winter scheduling period","requested for the same time on the same","day of the week for consecutive weeks and","allocated by the coordinator on that basis","or, if that is not possible, allocated at","approximately the same time;"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"97","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Vilja Savisaar-Toomast","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-98","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 2 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 13"]],"meps":[97308],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:44"},"new":["13) \u2018series of slots\u2019 shall mean at least 5","slots having been requested for the same","time on the same day of the week for","consecutive weeks and allocated by the","coordinator on that basis or, if that is not","possible, allocated at approximately the","same time;"],"old":["13) \u2018series of slots\u2019 shall mean at least 15","slots for a summer scheduling period and","10 slots for a winter scheduling period","requested for the same time on the same","day of the week for consecutive weeks and","allocated by the coordinator on that basis","or, if that is not possible, allocated at","approximately the same time;"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"98","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-99","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 2 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 13"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:44"},"new":["13) 'series of slots' shall mean at least 5","slots requested for the same time on the","same day of the week for consecutive","weeks and allocated by the coordinator on","that basis or, if that is not possible,","allocated at approximately the same time.","When an airport reaches a level of","congestion of 80% during peak weeks and","70% during off-peak weeks, that airport","may introduce a congestion local rule to","lengthen the series of slots qualifying for","a historic period,"],"old":["13) \u2018series of slots\u2019 shall mean at least 15","slots for a summer scheduling period and","10 slots for a winter scheduling period","requested for the same time on the same","day of the week for consecutive weeks and","allocated by the coordinator on that basis","or, if that is not possible, allocated at","approximately the same time;"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"99","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Dominique Riquet","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-100","justification":" Longer slot series would straight-jacket coordination.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 2 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 13"]],"meps":[96885],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:44"},"new":["13) 'series of slots' shall mean at least 5","slots requested for the same time on the","same day of the week for consecutive","weeks and allocated by the coordinator","on that basis or, if that is not possible,","allocated at approximately the same time;"],"old":["13) 'series of slots' shall mean at least 15","slots for a summer scheduling period and","10 slots for a winter scheduling period","requested for the same time on the same","day of the week for consecutive weeks and","allocated by the coordinator on that basis","or, if that is not possible, allocated at","approximately the same time;"],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"100","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Marian-Jean Marinescu","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-101","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 2 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 13"]],"meps":[33982],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:44"},"new":["13) \u2018series of slots\u2019 shall mean at least 5","slots having been requested for the same","time on the same day of the week for","consecutive weeks and allocated by the","coordinator on that basis or, if that is not","possible, allocated at approximately the","same time;"],"old":["13) \u2018series of slots\u2019 shall mean at least 15","slots for a summer scheduling period and","10 slots for a winter scheduling period","requested for the same time on the same","day of the week for consecutive weeks and","allocated by the coordinator on that basis","or, if that is not possible, allocated at","approximately the same time;"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"101","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-102","justification":"A considerable lengthening of the series would be anti-competitive, it would entrench\ndominant airlines' positions at home airports by reducing competitors' historic rights. It could\nmake it more difficult to qualify for a series, if a legacy carrier has its series in the middle of\na season other operators might not be able to have enough consecutive weeks to qualify for a\nseries , thereby negatively affecting business aviation and smaller airlines.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 2 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 13"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:44"},"new":["13) 'Series of slots' shall mean for the","summer scheduling period at least 15 slots","of which at least 5 shall be consecutive","unless agreed otherwise through a local","rule. For the winter scheduling period a","\"series of slots\" shall mean at least 10","slots of which at least 5 shall be","consecutive unless agreed otherwise","through a local rule. The slot allocated by","the coordinator shall be on the basis that","it is on the same time of the day and the","same day of the week or, if that is not","possible, allocated at approximately the","same time;"],"old":["13) \u2018series of slots\u2019 shall mean at least 15","slots for a summer scheduling period and","10 slots for a winter scheduling period","requested for the same time on the same","day of the week for consecutive weeks and","allocated by the coordinator on that basis","or, if that is not possible, allocated at","approximately the same time;"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"102","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Christine De Veyrac, Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-103","justification":" Extending the length of slot series would straight-jacket coordination and undermine the\n flexibility needed by many players. Slot series could nevertheless be extended under local\n guidelines and in response to specific local needs. This constitutes a return to the approach\n adopted under Council Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 of 18 January 1993.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 2 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 13"]],"meps":[4347,97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:44"},"new":["13) series of slots' shall mean at least 5","slots requested for the same scheduling","period regularly for the same time on the","same day of the week for consecutive","weeks and regularly allocated by the","coordinator or, if that is not possible,","allocated at approximately the same time;"],"old":["13) 'series of slots' shall mean at least 15","slots for a summer scheduling period and","10 slots for a winter scheduling period","requested for the same time on the same","day of the week for consecutive weeks and","allocated by the coordinator on that basis","or, if that is not possible, allocated at","","","approximately the same time;"],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"103","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Corien Wortmann-Kool","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-104","justification":" A series of slots is defined worldwide as a minimum of 5 slots (Worldwide Slot Guidelines).\n Introducing a different rule in Europe would be impractical given the global nature of\n aviation. However, under certain specific circumstances, local rules may be applied.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 2 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 13"]],"meps":[96810,96733,28393,28167],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:44"},"new":["13) 'series of slots' shall mean at least 5","slots having been requested for the same","time on the same day of the week regularly","in the same scheduling period and","allocated by the coordinator on that basis","or, if that is not possible, allocated at","approximately the same time, unless","agreed otherwise through a local rule","under the conditions as referred to in","Article 9, paragraph 8 of this Regulation;"],"old":["13) \u2018series of slots\u2019 shall mean at least 15","slots for a summer scheduling period and","10 slots for a winter scheduling period","requested for the same time on the same","day of the week for consecutive weeks and","allocated by the coordinator on that basis","or, if that is not possible, allocated at","approximately the same time;"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"104","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-105","justification":"The suggested changes of 9(3) and 10(2) make the definition of \"programmed non scheduled\nair services\" (PNS) redundant. This would simplify an already complex legal text. The\ndefinition of PNS remains unclear, such a lack of clarity could lead to varying interpretations\nof a notion that is not required.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 2 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 18"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:44"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["18) \u2018programmed non-scheduled air","service\u2019 shall mean a series of flights","which do not meet all the conditions of","Article 2(16) of Regulation (EC) No","1008/2008, but which operate so regularly","or frequently that they constitute a","recognisably systematic series;"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"105","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-106","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 2 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 18"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:44"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["18) 'programmed non-scheduled air","service' shall mean a series of flights","which do not meet all the conditions of","Article 2(16) of Regulation (EC)","No 1008/2008, but which operate so","regularly or frequently that they constitute","a recognisably systematic series;"],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"106","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian, Christine De Veyrac","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-107","justification":" It is essential that a better linkage with the business aviation activities is included by\n introducing a definition of \u2018non-scheduled air service\u2019 as the Regulation will apply and affect\n the business aviation sector.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 2 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 18"]],"meps":[96810,96733,4347],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:44"},"new":["18) \u2018non-scheduled air service\u2019 shall mean","a flight which does not meet all the","conditions of Article 2(16) of Regulation","(EC) No 1008/2008;"],"old":["18) \u2018programmed non-scheduled air","service\u2019 shall mean a series of flights","which do not meet all the conditions of","Article 2(16) of Regulation (EC) No","1008/2008, but which operate so regularly","or frequently that they constitute a","recognisably systematic series;"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"107","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Philippe De Backer, Gesine Meissner","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-108","justification":" Business aviation has a specific way of operating. Most business aviation operations cannot\n be included in the concept of \"programmed non-scheduled air services\". As business aviation\n is affected by the new Regulation on slots, a new definition is necessary.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 2 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 18 a (new)"]],"meps":[109337,96870],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:44"},"new":["18a) 'non-scheduled air service' shall","mean a flight which does not meet all the","conditions of Article 2 (16) of Regulation","(EC) No 1008/2008"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"108","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" James Nicholson","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-109","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 2 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 21 a (new)"]],"meps":[1318],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:44"},"new":["21a) 'Regional Airport' shall mean a non-","co-ordinated airport that operates regular","scheduled flights between distinct","geographical or political areas of a","Member State."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"109","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-110","justification":"The role of the Network Manager is one of coordination at the Network level, rather than\ngiving directions at local level. Each airport is responsible for its own Airport Operations\nPlan, which needs to be taken into account by the Network Manager.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 3 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 point ii"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:45"},"new":["(ii) upon request from the Commission, in","particular where new entrants encounter","serious problems in securing landing and","take off possibilities at the airport in","question, or when the network manager","considers it necessary to ensure that the","airport's network's operational plan is","consistent with the network's airport's","operational plan, in accordance with","Article 6(7) of Commission Regulation","(EU) No 677/2011;"],"old":["(ii) upon request from the Commission, in","particular where new entrants encounter","serious problems in securing landing and","take off possibilities at the airport in","question , or when the network manager","considers it necessary to ensure that the","airport's operational plan is consistent with","the network's operational plan, in","accordance with Article 6(7) of","Commission Regulation (EU) No","677/2011."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"110","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-111","justification":" The role of the Network Manager is one of coordination at the Network level, rather than\n giving directions at local level. Each airport is responsible for its own Airport Operations\n Plan, which needs to be taken into account by the Network Manager.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 3 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 point ii"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:45"},"new":["(ii) upon request from the Commission, in","particular where new entrants encounter","serious problems in securing landing and","take off possibilities at the airport in","question, or when the network manager","considers it necessary to ensure that the","network's operational plan is consistent","with the airport's operational plan, in","accordance with Article 6(7) of","Commission Regulation (EU) No","677/2011."],"old":["(ii) upon request from the Commission, in","particular where new entrants encounter","serious problems in securing landing and","take off possibilities at the airport in","question , or when the network manager","considers it necessary to ensure that the","airport's operational plan is consistent with","the network's operational plan, in","accordance with Article 6(7) of","Commission Regulation (EU) No","677/2011."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"111","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-112","justification":"Opposed to the proposals for the Commission to develop and adopt a delegated act\nprescribing the methodology for airport capacity assessments. Airport capacity assessment\ncan be complex and a \"one size fits all\" approach would not be appropriate. Suggests that the\nCommission might in conjunction with the Network Manager, help to develop best practice\nand guidance to achieve better network efficiency, rather than pursuing a regulatory\napproach.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 3 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 2"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:45"},"new":["This analysis, based on commonly","recognised methods which take account of","the requirements of the network","operational plan, as required by Annex V","to Regulation (EU) No 677/2011, shall","determine any shortfall in capacity, taking","into account environmental constraints at","the airport in question. The analysis shall","consider the possibilities of overcoming","such shortfall through new or modified","infrastructure, operational changes, or any","other change, and the time frame envisaged","to resolve the problems. The Commission","can, in conjunction with the Network","Manager, help to develop best practice","and guidance."],"old":["This analysis shall determine any shortfall","in capacity, taking into account","environmental constraints at the airport in","question. The analysis shall consider the","possibilities of overcoming such shortfall","through new or modified infrastructure,","operational changes, or any other change,","and the time frame envisaged to resolve the","problems.","",""],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"112","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-113","justification":"The Network Manager has no role in declaring capacity at an airport. The responsibility for\nairport capacity analysis and for setting the parameters should remain at local level taking\nlocal circumstances into account. The notion of the network airport in the Commission\nproposal would add further complexity to the network and costs at local level.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 3 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 3"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:45"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["The analysis is based on methods","determined by a Commission delegated","act, in accordance with Article 15 of this","Regulation. The methods take account of","the requirements of the network","operational plan, as required by Annex V","to Regulation (EU) No 677/2011."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"113","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-114","justification":" The Network Manager has no role in declaring capacity at an airport.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 3 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 3"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:45"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["The analysis is based on methods","determined by a Commission delegated","act, in accordance with Article 15 of this","Regulation. The methods take account of","the requirements of the network","operational plan, as required by Annex V","to Regulation (EU) No 677/2011."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"114","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Silvia-Adriana \u0142ic\u0103u","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-115","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 3 \u2013 paragraph 4"]],"meps":[36281],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:45"},"new":["4. On the basis of the analysis, the Member","State shall consult on the capacity situation","at the airport with the managing body of","the airport, the air carriers using the airport,","their representative organisations,","representatives of general aviation using","the airport regularly and air traffic control","authorities."],"old":["4. On the basis of the analysis, the Member","State shall consult on the capacity situation","at the airport with the managing body of","the airport, the air carriers using the airport","regularly, their representative","organisations, representatives of general","aviation using the airport regularly and air","traffic control authorities."],"orig_lang":"ro","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"115","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-116","justification":"This could imply that General Aviation has rights which de facto they do not have.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 3 \u2013 paragraph 4"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:45"},"new":["4. On the basis of the analysis, the Member","State shall consult on the capacity situation","at the airport with the managing body of","the airport, the air carriers using the airport","regularly, their representative","organisations, representatives of general","aviation and air traffic control authorities."],"old":["4. On the basis of the analysis, the Member","State shall consult on the capacity situation","at the airport with the managing body of","the airport, the air carriers using the airport","regularly, their representative","organisations, representatives of general","aviation using the airport regularly and air","traffic control authorities."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"116","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Michael Gahler, Markus Ferber","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-117","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 3 \u2013 paragraph 5"]],"meps":[2341,1917],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:45"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["5. The Commission can ask the network","manager to deliver an opinion on how the","capacity is set in relation to the network","operating needs. The Commission can","make recommendations. The Member","State shall give reasons for any decision","that does not follow these","recommendations. The decision shall be","communicated to the Commission."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"117","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-118","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 3 \u2013 paragraph 5"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:45"},"new":["5. The Commission can ask the network","manager to deliver an opinion on how the","capacity is set in relation to the network","operating needs."],"old":["5. The Commission can ask the network","manager to deliver an opinion on how the","capacity is set in relation to the network","operating needs. The Commission can","make recommendations. The Member","State shall give reasons for any decision","that does not follow these","recommendations. The decision shall be","communicated to the Commission."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"118","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-119","justification":" The Network Manager has no role in declaring capacity at an airport. The responsibility for\n airport capacity analysis and to set the parameters should remain at local level taking local\n circumstances into account. This should be done at Member State level, ideally with the\n managing body of the airport.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 3 \u2013 paragraph 5"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:45"},"new":["5. The Commission can ask the network","manager to deliver an opinion on how the","capacity is set in relation to the network","operating needs."],"old":["5. The Commission can ask the network","manager to deliver an opinion on how the","capacity is set in relation to the network","operating needs. The Commission can","make recommendations. The Member","State shall give reasons for any decision","that does not follow these","recommendations. The decision shall be","communicated to the Commission."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"119","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian, Michael Gahler","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-120","justification":"The designation of airports as coordinated should not occur if the emergency situation is very\nshort since the burden will not be proportionate.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 3 \u2013 paragraph 7"]],"meps":[96810,96733,2341],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:45"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["7. By way of derogation from paragraph","6(b), Member States may, in exceptional","circumstances, designate as coordinated","the airports affected for the appropriate","period , which can be less than a","scheduling period .","By way of derogation from paragraphs 3,","4, 5 and 6, Member States may, in","emergency situations, designate as","coordinated the airports affected for the","appropriate period."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"120","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Michael Gahler, Markus Ferber","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-121","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 3 \u2013 paragraph 7 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[2341,1917],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:45"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["By way of derogation from paragraph","6(b), Member States may, in exceptional","circumstances, designate as coordinated","the airports affected for the appropriate","period, which can be less than a","scheduling period ."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"121","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Michael Gahler, Markus Ferber","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-122","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 3 \u2013 paragraph 7 \u2013 subparagraph 2"]],"meps":[2341,1917],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:45"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["By way of derogation from paragraphs 3,","4, 5 and 6, Member States may, in","emergency situations, designate as","coordinated the airports affected for the","appropriate period."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"122","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Petra Kammerevert","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-123","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 3 \u2013 paragraph 9"]],"meps":[96837],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:45"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["9. At the request of the Commission,","which may act on its own initiative or on","the initiative of the network manager, and","after consulting the bodies mentioned in","paragraph 4, the Member State shall","ensure that an airport with no designation","status be designated as belonging to the","network. The decision shall be","communicated to the Commission. If the","Commission considers that the airport is","no longer of interest for the network, the","Member State, after consulting the bodies","mentioned in paragraph 4, shall change","the designation of the airport to that of an","airport with no designation status."],"orig_lang":"de","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"123","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-124","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 3 \u2013 paragraph 9"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:46"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["9. At the request of the Commission,","which may act on its own initiative or on","the initiative of the network manager, and","after consulting the bodies mentioned in","paragraph 4, the Member State shall","ensure that an airport with no designation","status be designated as belonging to the","network. The decision shall be","communicated to the Commission. If the","Commission considers that the airport is","no longer of interest for the network, the","Member State, after consulting the bodies","mentioned in paragraph 4, shall change","the designation of the airport to that of an","airport with no designation status."],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"124","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-125","justification":" The concept of network airports has to be defined by the Network Manager and the Slot\n Regulation is not the right place to address this concept. The notion of the network airport in\n the Commission proposal would add further complexity and costs to the coordination process\n without any evidence that this would be the best way to provide the Network Manager with\n potentially needed data. The collection of additional real time data would need to be\n evaluated and kept at a reasonable level.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 3 \u2013 paragraph 9"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:46"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["9. At the request of the Commission,","which may act on its own initiative or on","the initiative of the network manager, and","after consulting the bodies mentioned in","paragraph 4, the Member State shall","ensure that an airport with no designation","status be designated as belonging to the","network. The decision shall be","communicated to the Commission. If the","Commission considers that the airport is","no longer of importance for the network,","the Member State, after consulting the","","bodies mentioned in paragraph 4, shall","change the designation of the airport to","that of an airport with no designation","status."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"125","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-126","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 3 \u2013 paragraph 10"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:46"},"new":["10. If a decision is taken under paragraphs","6 or 8, the Member State shall","communicate it to the bodies mentioned in","paragraph 4 no later than 1 April for the","winter scheduling period and no later than","1 September for the summer scheduling","period."],"old":["10. If a decision is taken under","paragraphs 6, 8 or 9, the Member State","shall communicate it to the bodies","mentioned in paragraph 4 no later than","1 April for the winter scheduling period","and no later than 1 September for the","summer scheduling period."],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"126","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-127","justification":"The concept of network airports has to be defined by the Network Manager and the Slot\nRegulation is not the right place to address this concept. The notion of the network airport in\nthe Commission proposal would add further complexity and costs to the coordination process\nwithout any evidence that this would be the best way to provide the Network Manager with\npotentially needed data. The collection of additional real time data would need to be\nevaluated and kept at a reasonable level.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 3 \u2013 paragraph 10"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:46"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["10. If a decision is taken under","","","paragraphs 6, 8 or 9, the Member State","shall communicate it to the bodies","mentioned in paragraph 4 no later than 1","April for the winter scheduling period and","no later than 1 September for the summer","scheduling period."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"127","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Spyros Danellis, David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-128","justification":" A mandatory twice yearly capacity analysis in smaller airports, such as island and remote\n region airports, would constitute a considerable administrative burden and is unnecessary.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 4 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[99325,96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:46"},"new":["At a coordinated airport, the Member State","responsible shall ensure the determination","of the coordination parameters twice","yearly, while taking account of all relevant","technical, operational, performance and","environmental constraints as well as any","changes thereto. These constraints shall be","notified to the Commission. The","Commission, if necessary with the aid of","the network manager, shall examine the","constraints and deliver recommendations","which the Member State must take into","account before determining the","coordination parameters."],"old":["At a coordinated or schedules facilitated","airport, the Member State responsible shall","ensure the determination of the","coordination parameters twice yearly,","while taking account of all relevant","technical, operational , performance and","environmental constraints as well as any","changes thereto. These constraints shall be","notified to the Commission. The","Commission, if necessary with the aid of","the network manager, shall examine the","constraints and deliver recommendations","which the Member State must take into","account before determining the","coordination parameters."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"128","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Michael Gahler, Markus Ferber","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-129","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 4 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[2341,1917],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:46"},"new":["At a coordinated or schedules facilitated","airport, the Member State responsible shall","ensure the determination of the","coordination parameters twice yearly,","while taking account of all relevant","technical, operational , performance and","environmental constraints as well as any","changes thereto. These constraints shall be","notified to the Commission."],"old":["At a coordinated or schedules facilitated","airport, the Member State responsible shall","ensure the determination of the","coordination parameters twice yearly,","while taking account of all relevant","technical, operational , performance and","environmental constraints as well as any","changes thereto. These constraints shall be","notified to the Commission. The","Commission, if necessary with the aid of","the network manager, shall examine the","constraints and deliver recommendations","which the Member State must take into","account before determining the","coordination parameters."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"129","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-130","justification":"No need for the paragraph since the whole Regulation 95/93 is meant to be non-\ndiscriminatory.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 4 \u2013 paragraph 3"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:46"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["3. The determination of the coordination","parameters shall not affect the neutral","and non-discriminatory character of the","slot allocation."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"130","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-131","justification":"The Network Manager has no role in declaring capacity at an airport. The responsibility for\nairport capacity analysis and for setting the parameters should remain at local level taking\nlocal circumstances into account. The notion of the network airport in the Commission\nproposal would add further complexity to the network and costs at local level.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 5 \u2013 paragraph 1"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:46"},"new":["1. The Member State responsible for a","schedules facilitated or coordinated airport","shall ensure the appointment of a qualified","natural or legal person as schedules","facilitator or airport coordinator, after","having consulted the air carriers using the","airport regularly, their representative","organisations and the managing body of","the airport and the coordination committee,","where such a committee exists. The same","schedules facilitator or coordinator may be","appointed for more than one airport."],"old":["1. The Member State responsible for an","airport belonging to the network, a","schedules facilitated or coordinated airport","shall ensure the appointment of a qualified","natural or legal person as schedules","facilitator or airport coordinator, after","having consulted the air carriers using the","airport regularly, their representative","organisations and the managing body of","the airport and the coordination committee,","where such a committee exists. The same","schedules facilitator or coordinator may be","appointed for more than one airport."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"131","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-132","justification":" The Commission's proposal introduces a new concept of a European coordinator, which is\n not defined anywhere and makes this provision extremely unclear. It will be a bureaucratic,\n expensive and unnecessary body. Therefore, it should be deleted.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 5 \u2013 paragraph 2"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:46"},"new":["2. Member States shall encourage close","cooperation between the coordinators and","schedules facilitators to develop common","projects at a European level."],"old":["2. Member States shall encourage close","cooperation between the coordinators and","schedules facilitators to develop common","projects at a European level. In light of the","progress of these projects, the progress","made in implementing the Single","European Sky and the results of the","evaluation report mentioned in Article 21,","the Commission shall adopt implementing","acts for creating a European coordinator.","The implementing acts shall be adopted in","accordance with the examination","procedure referred to in Article 16(2). The","principles governing the coordinator's","independence in paragraph 3 of this","Article apply mutatis mutandis to the","European coordinator."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"132","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Giommaria Uggias","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-133","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 5 \u2013 paragraph 2"]],"meps":[97131],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:46"},"new":["2. Member States shall encourage close","cooperation between the coordinators and","schedules facilitators to develop common","projects at a European level. In order to","further improve the system for the","allocation of slots at European airports","and in the light of the progress made in","the common projects, the progress made in","implementing the Single European Sky and","the results of the assessment report","mentioned in Article 21, the Commission","shall adopt delegated acts for creating the","post of European coordinator. The","delegated acts shall be adopted in","accordance with the procedures referred to","in Article 15. The principles governing the","coordinator\u2019s independence, including in","financial terms and in terms of their","essential functions and organisational","and decision-making terms, referred to in","Article 5(3) apply mutatis mutandis to the","European coordinator. The Commission","shall appoint the European coordinator in","accordance with the examination","procedure referred to in Article 16(2)."],"old":["2. Member States shall encourage close","cooperation between the coordinators and","schedules facilitators to develop common","projects at a European level. In light of the","progress of these projects, the progress","made in implementing the Single European","Sky and the results of the assessment report","mentioned in Article 21, the Commission","","","shall adopt implementing measures for","creating a European coordinator. The","implementing measures shall be adopted","in accordance with the examination","procedure referred to in Article 16(2). The","principles governing the coordinator's","independence in paragraph 3 of this","Article apply mutatis mutandis to the","European coordinator."],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"133","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-134","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 5 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 point b \u2013 point i"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:46"},"new":["i) in legal terms, the coordinator's essential","functions, which consist of allocating slots","in an equal and non-discriminatory","manner, shall be given to a natural or legal","person who or which is not a service","provider in the airport, an airline operating","from the airport or the managing body of","the airport in question; in order to prove","that they do not share common interests","with these entities, the coordinator or","schedules facilitator must submit an","annual declaration of their financial","interests;"],"old":["i) in legal terms, the coordinator's essential","functions, which consist of allocating slots","in an equal and non-discriminatory","manner, shall be given to a natural or legal","person who or which is not a service","provider in the airport, an airline operating","from the airport or the managing body of","the airport in question;"],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"134","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-135","justification":" Ensuring balanced impartiality in the coordinators board.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 5 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 point b \u2013 point ii a (new)"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:46"},"new":["(iia) The composition of the coordinator's","board or supervisory function shall also","be independent of the direct interests of","the airport managing body, the airline","users of that airport and any other entity","representing a user or service provider,","however this does not preclude","representatives from such organisations","being members of a board or supervisory","function provided that voting rights are","balanced."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"135","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-136","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 5 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 point b \u2013 point ii a (new)"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:46"},"new":["iia) to that end, the coordinator or","schedules facilitator, whether as a natural","or legal person, must not have been","employed by, or worked regularly with,","the airport managing body or a service","provider or airline company operating","at/from the airport in question for the two","years preceding their appointment and for","two years from the end of their duties as a","coordinator or schedules facilitator."],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"136","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-137","justification":"This is to ensure a balanced impartiality in the coordinators board.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 5 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 point b \u2013 point ii a (new)"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:46"},"new":["(iia) that the composition of the","coordinator's board or supervisory","function shall also be independent of the","direct interests of the airport managing","body, the airline users of that airport and","any other entity representing a user or","service provider, however this does not","preclude representatives from such","organisations being members of a board","or supervisory function provided that","voting rights are balanced."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"137","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Christine De Veyrac","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-138","justification":" It would seem fair for all carriers benefitting from coordination to contribute to its cost, and\n for the amount of that contribution to correlate with the coordination service provided. Also,\n since airports already have the wherewithal to make collections, they would seem the right\n players to do this, and this avoids the need to create a new structure for this. Launching a\n consultation and appeal procedure will help prevent breaches of the rules and guarantee\n transparency.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 5 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 2"]],"meps":[4347],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:46"},"new":["The financing referred to under point (c)","shall be provided by all the air carriers who","operate in the coordinated and schedules","facilitated airports, and by those airports in","such a way as to ensure that the financial","burden is distributed equitably among all","interested parties and that the financing","does not largely depend on a sole interested","party. A stakeholder consultation","procedure, with the possibility of appeal,","shall be launched by Member States in","order to ensure transparent,","non-discriminatory charging correlating","to the service provided by the coordinator","or schedules facilitator. Collection of the","air carriers\u2019 payments shall be the","responsibility of the airports concerned,","which shall pay those amounts to the","coordinator or schedules facilitator. The","Member States shall ensure that the","financial, human, technical and material","resources and expertise required by the","coordinator for carrying out his duties are","at his disposal at all times."],"old":["The financing referred to under point (c)","shall be provided by the air carriers who","operate in the coordinated airports and by","the airports in such a way as to ensure that","the financial burden is distributed equitably","among all interested parties and that the","financing does not largely depend on a sole","interested party. The Member States shall","","ensure that the financial, human, technical","and material resources and expertise","required by the coordinator for carrying out","his duties are at his disposal at all times."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"138","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-139","justification":"Since all air carriers benefit directly from coordination activities, they should contribute\ndirectly to funding those activities so that the Member States can ensure that the coordinator\nhas the necessary financial, human, technical and material resources required to carry out\nhis duties.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 5 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 2"]],"meps":[97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:46"},"new":["The financing referred to under point (c)","shall be provided by the air carriers who","operate in the coordinated airports and by","the airports in such a way as to ensure that","the financial burden is distributed equitably","among all interested parties and that the","financing does not largely depend on a sole","interested party. The Member States shall","ensure that the financial, human, technical","and material resources and expertise","required by the coordinator for carrying out","his duties are at his disposal at all times. To","that effect, Member States shall establish","a charge for coordination activities,","payable by all air carriers operating from","coordinated airports and to the","coordinator for the carrying-out of his","duties;"],"old":["The financing referred to under point (c)","shall be provided by the air carriers who","operate in the coordinated airports and by","the airports in such a way as to ensure that","the financial burden is distributed equitably","among all interested parties and that the","financing does not largely depend on a sole","interested party. The Member States shall","ensure that the financial, human, technical","","and material resources and expertise","required by the coordinator for carrying out","his duties are at his disposal at all times."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"139","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Artur Zasada, Bogdan Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-140","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 5 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 2"]],"meps":[96778,96792],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:47"},"new":["The financing referred to under point (c)","shall be provided by the air carriers who","operate in the coordinated airports and","schedules facilitated airports and by the","airports in such a way as to ensure that the","financial burden is distributed equitably","among all interested parties and that the","financing does not largely depend on a sole","interested party. The Member States shall","ensure that adequate financial, human,","technical and material resources and","expertise are at the disposal of the","coordinator and the schedules facilitator","for carrying out their duties at all times.","All fees paid by the airlines shall be","collected by airports in parallel to the","airport charges. In case of coordination","implemented for the appropriate period","the cost of coordination should be covered","by the organization or entity that caused","the need for coordination. If it is not","possible to identify such organization or","entity the cost of coordination shall be","covered by the airport which has the right","to recover from the airlines 50% of","coordination costs;"],"old":["The financing referred to under point (c)","shall be provided by the air carriers who","operate in the coordinated airports and by","the airports in such a way as to ensure that","the financial burden is distributed equitably","among all interested parties and that the","financing does not largely depend on a sole","interested party. The Member States shall","ensure that the financial, human, technical","and material resources and expertise","required by the coordinator for carrying","out his duties are at its disposal at all","times.",""],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"140","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Spyros Danellis, David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-141","justification":" Considering the extensiveness of the report and the fact that slot data will be accessible on\n the electronic database anyway, it would be excessive to ask of smaller airports to conduct\n the report more often than annually.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 6 \u2013 paragraph 1"]],"meps":[99325,96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:47"},"new":["1. On an annual basis, the coordinator or","schedules facilitator shall submit to the","Member States concerned and to the","Commission an activity report describing","the general slot allocation and/or schedules","facilitation situation, examining, in","particular, the application of Article 9(5)","and Articles 13 and 18, as well as any","complaints regarding the application of","Articles 9 and 10 submitted to the","coordination committee and the steps taken","to resolve them. The report shall also","contain the results of a survey conducted","among the interested parties on the quality","of services provided by the coordinator."],"old":["1. At the end of each scheduling period,","the coordinator or schedules facilitator","shall submit to the Member States","concerned and to the Commission an","activity report describing the general slot","allocation and/or schedules facilitation","situation, examining, in particular, the","application of Article 9(5) and Articles 13","and 18, as well as any complaints","regarding the application of Articles 9 and","10 submitted to the coordination committee","and the steps taken to resolve them. The","report shall also contain the results of a","survey conducted among the interested","parties on the quality of services provided","by the coordinator."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"141","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Artur Zasada, Bogdan Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-142","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 6 \u2013 paragraph 1"]],"meps":[96778,96792],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:47"},"new":["1. At the end of each scheduling period, the","coordinator or schedules facilitator shall","submit to the Member States concerned","and to the Commission an activity report","describing the general slot allocation","and/or schedules facilitation situation,","examining, in particular, the application of","Article 9(5) and Articles 13 and 18, as well","as any complaints regarding the application","of Articles 9 and 10 submitted to the","coordination committee and the steps taken","to resolve them. Upon request, the report","shall be communicated to the legally","interested parties. The report shall also","contain the results of a survey conducted","among the interested parties on the quality","of services provided by the coordinator.","The coordinator and the schedules","facilitator shall furthermore submit to the","Commission, Member States and upon","request to all parties which has legal","interest an annual financial report","indicating in detail revenue and","expenditure relating to their activities."],"old":["1. At the end of each scheduling period, the","coordinator or schedules facilitator shall","submit to the Member States concerned","and to the Commission an activity report","describing the general slot allocation","and/or schedules facilitation situation,","examining, in particular, the application of","Article 9(5) and Articles 13 and 18, as well","as any complaints regarding the application","of Articles 9 and 10 submitted to the","coordination committee and the steps taken","to resolve them. The report shall also","contain the results of a survey conducted","among the interested parties on the quality","of services provided by the coordinator."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"142","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Marian-Jean Marinescu","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-143","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 6 \u2013 paragraph 1"]],"meps":[33982],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:47"},"new":["1. At the end of each scheduling period, the","coordinator or schedules facilitator shall","submit to the Member States concerned","and to the Commission as well as any","other interested party by request an","activity report and financial report","describing the general slot allocation","and/or schedules facilitation situation,","examining, in particular, the application of","Article 9(5) and Articles 13 and 18, as well","as any complaints regarding the application","of Articles 9 and 10 submitted to the","coordination committee and the steps taken","to resolve them. The report shall also","contain the results of a survey conducted","among the interested parties on the quality","of services provided by the coordinator."],"old":["1. At the end of each scheduling period, the","coordinator or schedules facilitator shall","submit to the Member States concerned","","and to the Commission an activity report","describing the general slot allocation","and/or schedules facilitation situation,","examining, in particular, the application of","Article 9(5) and Articles 13 and 18, as well","as any complaints regarding the application","of Articles 9 and 10 submitted to the","coordination committee and the steps taken","to resolve them. The report shall also","contain the results of a survey conducted","among the interested parties on the quality","of services provided by the coordinator."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"143","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Silvia-Adriana \u0142ic\u0103u","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-144","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 6 \u2013 paragraph 1"]],"meps":[36281],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:47"},"new":["1. At the end of each scheduling period,","the coordinator or schedules facilitator","shall submit to the Member States","concerned, the Commission, all","coordination financers and any other","stakeholder, at their request, a financial","report and an activity report describing the","general slot allocation and/or schedules","facilitation situation, examining, in","particular, the application of Article 9(5)","and Articles 13 and 18, as well as any","complaints regarding the application of","Articles 9 and 10 submitted to the","coordination committee and the steps taken","to resolve them. The report shall also","contain the results of a survey conducted","among the interested parties on the quality","of services provided by the coordinator."],"old":["1. At the end of each scheduling period,","the coordinator or schedules facilitator","shall submit to the Member States","concerned and to the Commission an","activity report describing the general slot","allocation and/or schedules facilitation","situation, examining, in particular, the","application of Article 9(5) and Articles 13","and 18, as well as any complaints","regarding the application of Articles 9 and","10 submitted to the coordination committee","and the steps taken to resolve them. The","report shall also contain the results of a","survey conducted among the interested","parties on the quality of services provided","by the coordinator."],"orig_lang":"ro","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"144","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Dominique Riquet","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-145","justification":"It is only natural, in the interests of full transparency, that airlines and airports that co-\nfinance coordinators should have access to the financial reports and activity reports.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 6 \u2013 paragraph 1"]],"meps":[96885],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:47"},"new":["1. At the end of each scheduling period,","the coordinator or schedules facilitator","shall submit to the Member States","concerned, to the Commission and to all","stakeholders an activity report and","financial report describing the general slot","allocation and/or schedules facilitation","situation, examining, in particular, the","application of Article 9(5) and Articles 13","and 18, as well as any complaints","regarding the application of Articles 9 and","10 submitted to the coordination committee","and the steps taken to resolve them. The","report shall also contain the results of a","survey conducted among the interested","parties on the quality of services provided","by the coordinator."],"old":["1. At the end of each scheduling period,","the coordinator or schedules facilitator","shall submit to the Member States","concerned and to the Commission an","activity report describing the general slot","allocation and/or schedules facilitation","situation, examining , , in particular, the","application of Article 9(5) and Articles 13","and 18, as well as any complaints","regarding the application of Articles 9 and","10 submitted to the coordination committee","and the steps taken to resolve them. The","report shall also contain the results of a","survey conducted among the interested","parties on the quality of services provided","by the coordinator."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"145","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-146","justification":" A survey every season is much too onerous on the airlines and is not necessary. Annual\n surveys are sufficient. Coordinators should also be accountable regarding the efficiency of\n their work.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 6 \u2013 paragraph 1"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:47"},"new":["1. Annually the coordinator or schedules","facilitator shall submit to the Member","States concerned, to the Commission, as","well as to any other interested party upon","request, an activity report describing the","general slot allocation and/or schedules","facilitation situation, examining , in","particular, the application of Article 9(5)","and Articles 13 and 18, as well as any","complaints regarding the application of","Articles 9 and 10 submitted to the","coordination committee and the steps taken","to resolve them. The report shall also cover","the cost efficiency and effectiveness of the","coordinator and contain the results of a","survey conducted among the interested","parties on the quality of services provided","by the coordinator."],"old":["1. At the end of each scheduling period,","the coordinator or schedules facilitator","shall submit to the Member States","","concerned and to the Commission an","activity report describing the general slot","allocation and/or schedules facilitation","situation, examining, in particular, the","application of Article 9(5) and Articles 13","and 18, as well as any complaints","regarding the application of Articles 9 and","10 submitted to the coordination committee","and the steps taken to resolve them. The","report shall also contain the results of a","survey conducted among the interested","parties on the quality of services provided","by the coordinator."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"146","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Marian-Jean Marinescu","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-147","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 6 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 introductory part"]],"meps":[33982],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:47"},"new":["The coordinator shall maintain, for each","airport, an up-to-date, freely-accessible","electronic database, containing the","following information:"],"old":["The coordinator shall maintain an up-to-","date, freely-accessible electronic database,","containing the following information:"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"147","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Silvia-Adriana \u0142ic\u0103u","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-148","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 6 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 point d"]],"meps":[36281],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:47"},"new":["d) remaining available slots with respect to","each type of constraint taken into","consideration in the coordination","parameters. The database shall allow the","air carriers to verify the availability of","slots;"],"old":["d) remaining available slots with respect to","each type of constraint taken into","consideration in the coordination","parameters. The database shall allow the","air carriers to verify the availability of slots","corresponding to their requests ;"],"orig_lang":"ro","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"148","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Marian-Jean Marinescu","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-149","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 6 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 point d"]],"meps":[33982],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:47"},"new":["(d) remaining available slots with respect","to each type of constraint taken into","consideration in the coordination","parameters. The database shall allow all","interested parties to verify the availability","of slots;"],"old":["(d) remaining available slots with respect","to each type of constraint taken into","consideration in the coordination","parameters. The database shall allow the","air carriers to verify the availability of","slots corresponding to their requests;"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"149","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Dominique Riquet, Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-150","justification":" It is only fair that both the parties concerned should have access to this information.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 6 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 point d"]],"meps":[96885,97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:47"},"new":["d) remaining available slots with respect to","each type of constraint taken into","consideration in the coordination","parameters. The database shall allow the","air carriers and airports to verify the","availability of slots corresponding to their","requests;"],"old":["d) remaining available slots with respect to","each type of constraint taken into","consideration in the coordination","parameters. The database shall allow the","air carriers to verify the availability of slots","","corresponding to their requests ;"],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"150","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-151","justification":" For the sake of clarification, the two concerned parties (airlines and airports) should have\n access to this information in order to optimize the usage of existing capacity.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 6 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 point d"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:47"},"new":["(d) remaining available slots with respect","to each type of constraint taken into","consideration in the coordination","parameters. The database shall allow the","air carriers to verify the availability of","slots;"],"old":["(d) remaining available slots with respect","to each type of constraint taken into","consideration in the coordination","parameters. The database shall allow the","air carriers to verify the availability of slots","corresponding to their requests;"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"151","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-152","justification":"Slots are constantly transferred or exchanged throughout the season and it would add no\nvalue to keep track of this on a data base. Therefore this obligation should be limited to\ntransfers with commercial arrangements. Transactions can be valued in monetary terms or\nnegotiations of another nature. Aggregate data on financial or other negotiated compensation\nshould not be published if only one transaction took place and the identity of the carriers can\ntherefore not be hidden.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 6 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 point e"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:47"},"new":["(e) slots transferred or exchanged for a","financial or other nature, indicating the","identity of the air carriers involved and","whether the transfer or exchange was made","for compensation of a financial or other","nature. Only aggregate data (i.e. data on","more than one transaction) on financial","compensation shall be published each year;"],"old":["(e) slots transferred or exchanged,","indicating the identity of the air carriers","involved and whether the transfer or","exchange was made for compensation of a","","financial or other nature. Aggregate data on","financial compensation shall be published","each year;"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"152","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Silvia-Adriana \u0142ic\u0103u","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-153","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 6 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 2"]],"meps":[36281],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:47"},"new":["This information shall be updated","regularly. At the end of each season, the","coordinator shall publish the activity report","and financial report mentioned in","paragraph 1."],"old":["This information shall be updated","regularly. At the end of each season, the","coordinator shall publish the activity report","mentioned in paragraph 1."],"orig_lang":"ro","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"153","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Marian-Jean Marinescu","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-154","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 6 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 2"]],"meps":[33982],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:47"},"new":["This information shall be updated","regularly. At the end of each season, the","coordinator shall publish the reports","mentioned in paragraph 1."],"old":["This information shall be updated","regularly. At the end of each season, the","coordinator shall publish the activity report","","","mentioned in paragraph 1."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"154","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-155","justification":" Consistency with Article 6 (1).","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 6 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 2"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:47"},"new":["This information shall be updated","regularly. At the end of each season, the","coordinator shall publish the activity and","financial report mentioned in paragraph 1."],"old":["This information shall be updated","regularly. At the end of each season, the","coordinator shall publish the activity report","mentioned in paragraph 1."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"155","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-156","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 7 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:47"},"new":["Air carriers operating or intending to","operate at a schedules facilitated or","coordinated airport shall submit to the","schedules facilitator or coordinator all","relevant information requested by them. If","this information changes, the air carriers","shall inform the schedules facilitator and","the coordinator at the earliest suitable and","possible opportunity. All relevant","information shall be provided in the format","and within the time-limit specified by the","schedules facilitator or coordinator. In","particular, an air carrier shall inform the","coordinator, at the time of the request for","allocation, whether it would benefit from","the status of new entrant, in accordance","with Article 2(2), in respect of requested","slots."],"old":["Air carriers operating or intending to","operate at a schedules facilitated or","coordinated airport belonging to the","network shall submit to the schedules","facilitator or coordinator all relevant","information requested by them. If this","information changes, the air carriers shall","inform the schedules facilitator and the","coordinator as soon as possible. All","relevant information shall be provided in","the format and within the time-limit","specified by the schedules facilitator or","","","coordinator. In particular, an air carrier","shall inform the coordinator, at the time of","the request for allocation, whether it would","benefit from the status of new entrant, in","accordance with Article 2(2), in respect of","requested slots."],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"156","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Michael Gahler, Markus Ferber","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-157","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 7 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[2341,1917],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:48"},"new":["Air carriers operating or intending to","operate at a schedules facilitated or","coordinated airport shall submit to the","schedules facilitator or coordinator all","relevant information requested by them. If","this information changes, the air carriers","shall inform the schedules facilitator and","the coordinator as soon as possible. All","relevant information shall be provided","within the time-limit specified by the","schedules facilitator or coordinator. In","particular, an air carrier shall inform the","coordinator, at the time of the request for","allocation, whether it would benefit from","the status of new entrant, in accordance","with Article 2(2), in respect of requested","slots."],"old":["Air carriers operating or intending to","operate at a schedules facilitated or","coordinated airport belonging to the","network shall submit to the schedules","facilitator or coordinator all relevant","information requested by them. If this","information changes, the air carriers shall","inform the schedules facilitator and the","coordinator as soon as possible. All","relevant information shall be provided in","the format and within the time-limit","specified by the schedules facilitator or","coordinator. In particular, an air carrier","shall inform the coordinator, at the time of","the request for allocation, whether it would","benefit from the status of new entrant, in","accordance with Article 2(2), in respect of","requested slots."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"157","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-158","justification":" The concept of network airports has to be defined by the Network Manager and the Slot\n Regulation is not the right place to address this concept. The notion of the network airport in\n the Commission proposal would add further complexity and costs to the coordination process\n without any evidence that this would be the best way to provide the Network Manager with\n potentially needed data. The collection of additional real time data would need to be\n evaluated and kept at a reasonable level.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 7 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:48"},"new":["Air carriers operating or intending to","operate at a schedules facilitated or","coordinated airport shall submit to the","schedules facilitator or coordinator all","relevant information requested by them. If","this information changes, the air carriers","shall inform the schedules facilitator and","the coordinator as soon as possible. All","relevant information shall be provided in","the format and within the time-limit","specified by the schedules facilitator or","coordinator. In particular, an air carrier","shall inform the coordinator, at the time of","the request for allocation, whether it would","benefit from the status of new entrant, in","accordance with Article 2(2), in respect of","requested slots."],"old":["Air carriers operating or intending to","operate at a schedules facilitated or","coordinated airport belonging to the","network shall submit to the schedules","facilitator or coordinator all relevant","information requested by them. If this","information changes, the air carriers shall","inform the schedules facilitator and the","coordinator as soon as possible. All","relevant information shall be provided in","the format and within the time-limit","specified by the schedules facilitator or","coordinator. In particular, an air carrier","shall inform the coordinator, at the time of","the request for allocation, whether it would","benefit from the status of new entrant, in","accordance with Article 2(2), in respect of","requested slots."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"158","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-159","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 7 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:48"},"new":["Air carriers operating or intending to","operate at a schedules facilitated or","coordinated airport shall submit to the","schedules facilitator or coordinator,","respectively, all relevant information","requested by them. If this information","changes, the air carriers shall inform the","schedules facilitator and the coordinator as","soon as possible. All relevant information","shall be provided within the time-limit","specified by the schedules facilitator or","coordinator. In particular, an air carrier","shall inform the coordinator, at the time of","the request for allocation, whether it would","benefit from the status of new entrant, in","accordance with Article 2(2), in respect of","requested slots."],"old":["Air carriers operating or intending to","operate at a schedules facilitated or","coordinated airport belonging to the","network shall submit to the schedules","","","facilitator or coordinator all relevant","information requested by them. If this","information changes, the air carriers shall","inform the schedules facilitator and the","coordinator as soon as possible. All","relevant information shall be provided in","the format and within the time-limit","specified by the schedules facilitator or","coordinator. In particular, an air carrier","shall inform the coordinator, at the time of","the request for allocation, whether it would","benefit from the status of new entrant, in","accordance with Article 2(2), in respect of","requested slots."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"159","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Michael Gahler, Markus Ferber","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-160","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 7 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 subparagraph 1 a (new)"]],"meps":[2341,1917],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:48"},"new":["The format and scope of the information","referred to in this article is determined in","an agreed worldwide industry standard.","The information provided shall be used","for the purpose of this Regulation only."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"160","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Michael Gahler, Markus Ferber","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-161","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 7 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 subparagraph 2"]],"meps":[2341,1917],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:48"},"new":["For all other airports with no particular","designation status the managing body of","the airport shall provide, when requested","by a coordinator, any information in their","possession about the planned services of","air carriers."],"old":["For all other airports with no particular","designation status, the air carriers","operating or intending to operate from","","that airport, the managing body of the","airport , the groundhandling service","providers and the air navigation service","providers shall provide, when requested by","a coordinator, any information in their","possession about the planned services of","air carriers."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"161","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-162","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 7 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 subparagraph 2"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:48"},"new":["For all other airports with no particular","designation status, the managing body of","the airport shall provide, when requested","by a coordinator, any information in its","possession about the planned services of","air carriers."],"old":["For all other airports with no particular","designation status, the air carriers","operating or intending to operate from","that airport, the managing body of the","airport, the groundhandling service","providers and the air navigation service","providers shall provide, when requested by","a coordinator, any information in their","possession about the planned services of","air carriers."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"162","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-163","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 7 \u2013 paragraph 2"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:48"},"new":["2. Where an air carrier fails to provide the","information referred to in paragraph 1,","unless it can satisfactorily demonstrate that","mitigating circumstances exist, or provides","false or misleading information, the","coordinator shall not take into","consideration the slot request or requests","by that air carrier to which the missing,","false or misleading information relates. It","shall recommend that penalties be imposed","by the competent body under national law.","The coordinator shall give that air carrier","the opportunity to submit its observations."],"old":["2. Where an air carrier fails to provide the","information referred to in paragraph 1,","unless it can satisfactorily demonstrate that","mitigating circumstances exist, or provides","false or misleading information, the","","coordinator shall not take into","consideration the slot request or requests","by that air carrier to which the missing,","false or misleading information relates. It","shall withdraw the series of slots if they","were already allocated and/or recommend","that penalties be imposed by the competent","body under national law. The coordinator","shall give that air carrier the opportunity to","submit its observations."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"163","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian, Luis de Grandes Pascual","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-164","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 7 \u2013 paragraph 3 a (new)"]],"meps":[96810,96733,28393],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:48"},"new":["3a. The format and scope of the","information referred to in this article is","determined in an agreed worldwide","industry standard. The information","provided shall be used for the purpose of","this Regulation only."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"164","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-165","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 8 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:48"},"new":["At a coordinated airport, the Member State","responsible shall ensure that a coordination","committee is set up. The same coordination","committee may be designated for more","than one airport. Membership of this","committee shall be open at least to the air","carriers using the airport(s) in question","more than occasionally and their","representative organisations, the managing","body of the airport concerned, the relevant","air traffic control authorities, the","representatives of general aviation using","the airport regularly , the network manager,","the performance review body and the","national supervisory authority of the","Member State concerned .","The coordination committee may invite","other slot allocation stakeholders to be","observers; however, when a third party","requests to participate in a coordination","committee meetings, the committee shall","be entitled to check the credentials of the","requesting third party and the relevance","of their request."],"old":["At a coordinated airport, the Member State","responsible shall ensure that a coordination","committee is set up. The same coordination","committee may be designated for more","than one airport. Membership of this","committee shall be open at least to the air","","carriers using the airport(s) in question","regularly and their representative","organisations, the managing body of the","airport concerned, the relevant air traffic","control authorities, the representatives of","general aviation using the airport","regularly , the network manager, the","performance review body and the national","supervisory authority of the Member State","concerned ."],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"165","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Silvia-Adriana \u0142ic\u0103u","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-166","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 8 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[36281],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:48"},"new":["At a coordinated airport, the Member State","responsible shall ensure that a coordination","committee is set up. The same coordination","committee may be designated for more","than one airport. Membership of this","committee shall be open at least to the air","carriers using the airport(s) in question","regularly and their representative","organisations, the managing body of the","airport concerned, the relevant air traffic","control authorities, the representatives of","general aviation using the airport, the","network manager, the performance review","body and the national supervisory authority","of the Member State concerned."],"old":["At a coordinated airport, the Member State","responsible shall ensure that a coordination","committee is set up. The same coordination","committee may be designated for more","than one airport. Membership of this","committee shall be open at least to the air","carriers using the airport(s) in question","regularly and their representative","organisations, the managing body of the","airport concerned, the relevant air traffic","control authorities, the representatives of","general aviation using the airport","regularly , the network manager, the","performance review body and the national","supervisory authority of the Member State","concerned ."],"orig_lang":"ro","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"166","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Michael Gahler, Markus Ferber","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-167","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 8 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[2341,1917],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:48"},"new":["At a coordinated airport, the Member State","responsible shall ensure that a coordination","committee is set up. The same coordination","committee may be designated for more","than one airport. Membership of this","committee shall be open at least to the air","carriers using the airport(s) in question","regularly and their representative","organisations, the managing body of the","airport concerned, the relevant air traffic","control authorities, the representatives of","general aviation using the airport regularly","and the national supervisory authority of","the Member State concerned."],"old":["At a coordinated airport, the Member State","responsible shall ensure that a coordination","committee is set up. The same coordination","committee may be designated for more","than one airport. Membership of this","committee shall be open at least to the air","carriers using the airport(s) in question","regularly and their representative","organisations, the managing body of the","airport concerned, the relevant air traffic","control authorities, the representatives of","general aviation using the airport regularly",", the network manager, the performance","review body and the national supervisory","authority of the Member State concerned."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"167","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-168","justification":" The Network Manager and the Performance Review Body should only have an Observer\n status without any voting rights.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 8 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:48"},"new":["At a coordinated airport, the Member State","responsible shall ensure that a coordination","committee is set up. The same coordination","committee may be designated for more","than one airport. Membership of this","coordination committee shall be restricted","to air carriers that have used the airport","during the current and previous season,","the managing body of the airport, the air","navigation service provider at that airport,","the coordinator and representatives of","general aviation. In addition to these","members, representatives of the network","manager, the performance review body and","the national supervisory authority may","attend in an observer capacity only and","have no voting rights. The chairman of","the coordination committee may invite","additional observers to act as advisors","where such observers' terms of reference","are communicated to the coordination","committee seven working days in advance","of the meeting."],"old":["At a coordinated airport, the Member State","responsible shall ensure that a coordination","committee is set up. The same coordination","committee may be designated for more","than one airport. Membership of this","committee shall be open at least to the air","carriers using the airport(s) in question","regularly and their representative","","organisations, the managing body of the","airport concerned, the relevant air traffic","control authorities, the representatives of","general aviation using the airport","regularly , the network manager, the","performance review body and the national","supervisory authority of the Member State","concerned."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"168","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-169","justification":"The role of the network manager is described in the network manager Implementing\nRegulation (EC Regulation 677/2011).","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 8 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:48"},"new":["At a coordinated airport, the Member State","responsible shall ensure that a coordination","committee is set up. The same coordination","committee may be designated for more","than one airport. Membership of this","committee shall be open at least to the air","carriers using the airport(s) in question","regularly and their representative","organisations, the managing body of the","airport concerned, the relevant air traffic","control authorities, the representatives of","general aviation and the national","supervisory authority of the Member State","concerned."],"old":["At a coordinated airport, the Member State","responsible shall ensure that a coordination","committee is set up. The same coordination","committee may be designated for more","than one airport. Membership of this","committee shall be open at least to the air","carriers using the airport(s) in question","regularly and their representative","organisations, the managing body of the","airport concerned, the relevant air traffic","control authorities, the representatives of","general aviation using the airport","regularly, the network manager, the","performance review body and the national","","supervisory authority of the Member State","concerned."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"169","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Michael Gahler, Markus Ferber","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-170","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 8 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 subparagraph 2 \u2013 point a \u2013 point iv"]],"meps":[2341,1917],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:48"},"new":["(iv) local guidelines related to the","supervision of the use of slots allocated or","the determination of capacity as provided","for in Article 9(8);"],"old":["(iv) local guidelines as provided for in","Article 9(8);"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"170","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian, Luis de Grandes Pascual","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-171","justification":" It is essential that the coordination committee also be in charge of monitoring the tasks of the\n coordinator and the cost effectiveness of its work.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 8 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 subparagraph 2 \u2013 point a \u2013 point vii a (new)"]],"meps":[96810,96733,28393],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:48"},"new":["(viia) any issues concerning the tasks and","organization of the coordinator and the","efficiency, costs and effectiveness of the","coordinator."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"171","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Michael Gahler, Markus Ferber","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-172","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 8 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 subparagraph 2 \u2013 point b"]],"meps":[2341,1917],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:48"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["(b) to provide the performance review","body and the national supervisory","authority with opinions concerning the","link between the coordination parameters","and the key performance indicators","proposed to the air navigation service","providers as defined by Commission","Regulation (EU) No 691/2010."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"172","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-173","justification":" In order to ensure that each stakeholder in the coordination committee can give an opinion on\n\nsuggested local guidelines, that committee should establish a voting system for this.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 8 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:48"},"new":["The coordination committee shall draw up","written rules of procedure covering, inter","alia participation, elections, the frequency","of meetings, the voting system applicable","to suggested local guidelines and the","language(s) used."],"old":["The coordination committee shall draw up","written rules of procedure covering, inter","alia participation, elections, the frequency","of meetings, and language(s) used."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"173","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-174","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 8 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:48"},"new":["The coordination committee shall draw up","written rules of procedure covering, inter","alia participation, elections, the frequency","of meetings, voting and language(s) used."],"old":["The coordination committee shall draw up","written rules of procedure covering, inter","alia participation, elections, the frequency","of meetings, and language(s) used."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"174","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-175","justification":" Sister amendment to the one to Article 8(3)(1). The coordination committee should be able to\n issue and opinion on any suggested local guideline, and not simply at the request of the\n coordinator. This would give greater legitimacy to the suggested local guidelines. This voting\n system would not undermine any final decision taken by the Member State, since the\n coordination committee would only issue an advisory opinion.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 8 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 2"]],"meps":[97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:48"},"new":["Any member of the coordination","committee may propose local guidelines as","provided for in Article 9(8). The","coordination committee shall discuss","suggested local guidelines, and issue an","advisory opinion on these following a","vote. A report of the discussions in the","coordination committee and any","agreement on local guidelines shall be","submitted to the Member State concerned","with an indication of the respective","positions stated within the committee. This","report shall also be communicated to the","performance review body and the network","manager ."],"old":["Any member of the coordination","committee may propose local guidelines as","provided for in Article 9(8). At the request","of the coordinator, the coordination","committee shall discuss suggested local","guidelines. A report of the discussions in","the coordination committee shall be","submitted to the Member State concerned","with an indication of the respective","positions stated within the committee. This","report shall also be communicated to the","performance review body and the network","manager ."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"175","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-176","justification":" All actors concerned within the coordination committee, as well as the Member State must\n agree on the deployment of local rules.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 8 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 2"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:49"},"new":["Any member of the coordination","committee may propose local guidelines as","provided for in Article 9 (8). The","coordination committee shall discuss and","vote on suggested local guidelines. A","report of the discussions and any agreed","actions in the coordination committee shall","be submitted to the Member State","concerned with an indication of the","respective positions stated within the","committee. This report shall also be","communicated to the performance review","body and the network manager."],"old":["Any member of the coordination","committee may propose local guidelines as","provided for in Article 9(8). At the request","of the coordinator, the coordination","committee shall discuss suggested local","guidelines. A report of the discussions in","the coordination committee shall be","submitted to the Member State concerned","with an indication of the respective","positions stated within the committee. This","report shall also be communicated to the","performance review body and the network","manager."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"176","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Michael Gahler, Markus Ferber","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-177","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 8 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 2"]],"meps":[2341,1917],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:49"},"new":["At the request of the coordinator, the","coordination committee shall discuss","suggested local guidelines. A report of the","discussions in the coordination committee","shall be submitted to the Member State","concerned with an indication of the","respective positions stated within the","committee. This report shall also be","communicated to the performance review","body and the network manager."],"old":["Any member of the coordination","committee may propose local guidelines","as provided for in Article 9(8). At the","request of the coordinator, the coordination","committee shall discuss suggested local","guidelines. A report of the discussions in","the coordination committee shall be","submitted to the Member State concerned","with an indication of the respective","positions stated within the committee. This","report shall also be communicated to the","performance review body and the network","manager ."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"177","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"James Nicholson","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-178","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 9 \u2013 paragraph 1"]],"meps":[1318],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:49"},"new":["1. The coordinator shall set up a pool,","which shall contain all the slots. All new","slot capacity determined pursuant to","Article 3(3) shall be placed in the pool.","This procedure shall be without prejudice","to regional airports connectivity to hub","airports. If such connectivity is","undermined Member States shall be","permitted to intervene."],"old":["1. The coordinator shall set up a pool,","which shall contain all the slots. All new","slot capacity determined pursuant to","Article 3(3) shall be placed in the pool."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"178","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-179","justification":" Under the present regulation the slot pool consists of all slots not allocated on the basis of\n historical precedence or re-timings. There is no reason to change this setup.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 9 \u2013 paragraph 1"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:49"},"new":["1. The coordinator shall set up a pool,","which shall contain all the slots not","allocated on the basis of Articles 10(2),","(3). All new slot capacity determined","pursuant to Article 3 (3) will be placed in","the pool."],"old":["1. The coordinator shall set up a pool,","which shall contain all the slots. All new","slot capacity determined pursuant to","Article 3(3) shall be placed in the pool."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"179","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Petra Kammerevert","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-180","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 9 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[96837],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:49"},"new":["Without prejudice to Article 10(2)","and (3) of this Regulation and without","prejudice to Article 19(2) of Regulation","(EC) No 1008/2008, slots placed in the","pool shall be distributed among applicant","air carriers. 50 % of these slots shall first","be allocated to new entrants unless requests","by new entrants are less than 50 %. The","coordinator shall treat the requests of new","entrants and other carriers fairly, in","accordance with the coordination periods","of each scheduling day."],"old":["Without prejudice to Article 10(2)","and (3) of this Regulation and without","prejudice to Article 19(2) of Regulation","(EC) No 1008/2008, slots placed in the","pool shall be distributed among applicant","air carriers. 50 % of these slots shall first","be allocated to new entrants unless requests","by new entrants are less than 50 %. The","preference given to new entrants shall be","respected during the entire scheduling","period. The coordinator shall treat the","requests of new entrants and other carriers","fairly, in accordance with the coordination","periods of each scheduling day."],"orig_lang":"de","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"180","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-181","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 9 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:49"},"new":["Without prejudice to Article 10(2) and (3)","of this Regulation and without prejudice to","Article 19(2) of Regulation (EC) No","1008/2008, slots placed in the pool shall be","distributed among applicant air carriers. 50","% of these slots shall first be allocated to","new entrants unless requests by new","entrants are less than 50 %. The","coordinator shall treat the requests of new","entrants and other carriers fairly, in","accordance with the coordination periods","of each scheduling day."],"old":["Without prejudice to Article 10(2) and (3)","of this Regulation and without prejudice to","Article 19(2) of Regulation (EC) No","1008/2008, slots placed in the pool shall be","distributed among applicant air carriers. 50","% of these slots shall first be allocated to","new entrants unless requests by new","entrants are less than 50 %. The preference","given to new entrants shall be respected","during the entire scheduling period. The","coordinator shall treat the requests of new","entrants and other carriers fairly, in","accordance with the coordination periods","of each scheduling day."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"181","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-182","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 9 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 subparagraph 2"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:49"},"new":["Among requests from new entrants,","consideration shall only be given to those","qualifying for new entrant status under","Article 2(2)( (b)."],"old":["Among requests from new entrants,","preference shall be given to air carriers","qualifying for new entrant status under","Article 2(2)( (b)"],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"182","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-183","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 9 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 subparagraph 2"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:49"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["Among requests from new entrants,","preference shall be given to air carriers","qualifying for new entrant status under","Article 2(2)(b)"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"183","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-184","justification":" The definition of \"programmed non-scheduled air services\" (PNS) is vague. It isn't clear from\n the proposal which operators are covered by PNS and which are excluded (and thus could not\n qualify for historical rights). Such a situation could lead to a range of interpretations by slot\n coordinators, which would not be in the interest of the single market.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 9 \u2013 paragraph 3"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:49"},"new":["3. Without prejudice to Article 10(2), in a","situation where all slot requests cannot be","accommodated to the satisfaction of the air","carriers concerned, preference shall be","given to commercial air services. In the","case of competing requests within the same","category of services, priority shall be given","for year round operations."],"old":["3. Without prejudice to Article 10(2), in a","situation where all slot requests cannot be","accommodated to the satisfaction of the air","carriers concerned, preference shall be","given to commercial air services and in","particular to scheduled air services and","programmed non-scheduled air services.","In the case of competing requests within","the same category of services, priority shall","be given for year round operations."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"184","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-185","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 9 \u2013 paragraph 3"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:49"},"new":["3. Without prejudice to Article 10(2), in a","situation where all slot requests cannot be","accommodated to the satisfaction of the air","carriers concerned, preference shall be","given to commercial air services. In the","case of competing requests within the same","category of services, priority shall be given","for year round operations."],"old":["3. Without prejudice to Article 10(2), in a","situation where all slot requests cannot be","accommodated to the satisfaction of the air","carriers concerned, preference shall be","given to commercial air services and in","particular to scheduled air services and","programmed non-scheduled air services.","In the case of competing requests within","the same category of services, priority shall","be given for year round operations."],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"185","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Marian-Jean Marinescu","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-186","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 9 \u2013 paragraph 3"]],"meps":[33982],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:49"},"new":["3. Without prejudice to Article 10(2), in a","situation where all slot requests cannot be","accommodated to the satisfaction of the air","carriers concerned, preference shall be","given to all types of commercial air","services. In the case of competing requests","within the same category of services,","priority shall be given for year round","operations."],"old":["3. Without prejudice to Article 10(2), in a","situation where all slot requests cannot be","accommodated to the satisfaction of the air","carriers concerned, preference shall be","given to commercial air services and in","particular to scheduled air services and","programmed non-scheduled air services.","In the case of competing requests within","the same category of services, priority shall","be given for year round operations."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"186","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Philippe De Backer, Gesine Meissner","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-187","justification":" When an airport becomes coordinated, business aviation operators are no longer able to gain\n and maintain slots at that airport. In order to protect the infrastructure and investments that\n were made in that airport, business aviation operators and other non-scheduled operators\n should be able to continue benefiting from these investments. Therefore, it would be good if a\n number of slots available at the affected airport are reserved to non-scheduled and business\n aviation operators.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 9 \u2013 paragraph 3 a (new)"]],"meps":[109337,96870],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:49"},"new":["3a. For non-scheduled air services,","airport coordinators will reserve a number","of slots per hour for an entire scheduling","season for the sole use of non-scheduled","and business aviation operations. This","allocation will be based on the historical","usage by non-scheduled air services in the","previous equivalent scheduling season.","Airport coordinators will allocate the","reserved slots to non-scheduled air","services in a non-discriminatory manner."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"187","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-188","justification":"There is no reason to use the word \u201cpriority\u201d because Article 10 is about \u201chistorical slots\u201d\nand historical precedence is a globally used and accepted terminology.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 9 \u2013 paragraph 5 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:49"},"new":["In the case of services operated by a group","of air carriers, only one of the participating","air carriers can apply for the required slots.","The air carrier operating such a service","accepts responsibility for meeting the","operating criteria required to maintain","historical precedence referred to in Article","10 (2)."],"old":["In the case of services operated by a group","of air carriers, only one of the participating","air carriers can apply for the required slots.","The air carrier operating such a service","accepts responsibility for meeting the","operating criteria required to benefit from","the priority referred to in Article 10(2)."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"188","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Debora Serracchiani","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-189","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 9 \u2013 paragraph 8"]],"meps":[96865],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:49"},"new":["8. The coordinator shall also take into","account additional guidelines established","by the air transport industry Union -wide or","world-wide as well as local guidelines","proposed by the coordination committee","and approved by the Member State or any","other competent body responsible for the","airport in question, provided that such","guidelines do not affect the independent","status of the coordinator, comply with","Union law, aim at improving the efficient","use of airport capacity and have been","notified in advance to and pre-approved by","the Commission. Local Rules concern the","allocation and monitoring of slots. These","can be applied where performance or","throughput improvements can be","delivered through locally applied rules,","these must be transparent and non-","discriminatory. The local guidelines may","only concern the monitoring of the use of","slots allocated or the amendment of the","definition of a series of slots to reduce its","length below 10 slots for the winter","scheduling period or below 15 slots for the","summer scheduling period, but under no","circumstances below 5 slots. The reduction","of the length of the series of slots applies","only at airports where demand for air","services is highly seasonable."],"old":["8. The coordinator shall also take into","account additional guidelines established","by the air transport industry Union -wide or","world-wide as well as local guidelines","proposed by the coordination committee","and approved by the Member State or any","other competent body responsible for the","airport in question, provided that such","guidelines do not affect the independent","status of the coordinator, comply with","Union law, aim at improving the efficient","use of airport capacity and have been","notified in advance to and pre-approved by","the Commission . The local guidelines may","only concern the monitoring of the use of","slots allocated or the amendment of the","definition of a series of slots to reduce its","length below 10 slots for the winter","scheduling period or below 15 slots for the","summer scheduling period, but under no","circumstances below 5 slots. The reduction","of the length of the series of slots applies","only at airports where demand for air","services is highly seasonable."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"189","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Christine De Veyrac","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-190","justification":" The scope of local guidelines should not be limited to slot supervision, since they can also be\n used in response to unforeseeable urgent cases. It is essential to keep matters flexible in this\n respect. Moreover, the possibility of adapting the length of the slot series using a local\n guideline, while relevant, should serve to extend and not to reduce the length of a series.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 9 \u2013 paragraph 8"]],"meps":[4347],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:49"},"new":["8. The coordinator shall also take into","account additional guidelines established","by the air transport industry Union-wide or","world-wide as well as local guidelines","proposed by the coordination committee","and approved by the Member State or any","other competent body responsible for the","airport in question, provided that such","guidelines do not affect the independent","status of the coordinator, comply","with Union law, aim at improving the","efficient use of airport capacity and have","been notified in advance to and","pre-approved by the Commission within","two months. In urgent cases, the Member","State concerned may call on the","Commission to approve a local guideline","within a shorter time-scale of just two","weeks. Local guidelines may relate to the","amendment of the definition of the series","of slots, for extending its length to over","10 slots. The Commission may adopt","implementing measures aimed at","broadening the scope of a local guideline","to apply to all EU airports. Those","implementing measures shall be adopted","in accordance with the examination","procedure referred to in Article 16(2)."],"old":["8. The coordinator shall also take into","account additional guidelines established","by the air transport industry world-wide or","Union -wide as well as local guidelines","proposed by the coordination committee","and approved by the Member State or any","other competent body responsible for the","airport in question, provided that such","guidelines do not affect the independent","status of the coordinator, comply with","Union law, aim at improving the efficient","use of airport capacity and have been","notified in advance to and pre-approved by","the Commission . The local guidelines","may only concern the supervision of the","use of slots allocated or the amendment of","the definition of the series of slots for","reducing its length below 10 slots for the","winter scheduling period or below 15 slots","for the summer scheduling period, but","under no circumstances below 5 slots. The","reduction of the length of the series of","slots applies only in airports where","demand for air services is highly","seasonable."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"190","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Spyros Danellis","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-191","justification":"The Regulation should allow local circumstances to be taken into account when airports and\nairport users can jointly set performance-enhancing arrangements, while also giving the\nCommission the freedom to assess local rules on a case-by-case basis.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 9 \u2013 paragraph 8"]],"meps":[99325],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:49"},"new":["8. The coordinator shall also take into","account additional guidelines established","by the air transport industry Union -wide or","world-wide as well as local guidelines","proposed by the coordination committee","and approved by the Member State or any","other competent body responsible for the","airport in question. Such guidelines should","not affect the independent status of the","coordinator, should comply with Union","law, should aim at improving the efficient","use of airport capacity taking local","circumstances into account, and should","be notified in advance to the Commission","and be pre-approved. The local guidelines","may only concern the allocation and","monitoring of slots and can be introduced","in cases where they can result in","performance improvements, such as in","airports where slot demand displays strong","seasonability."],"old":["8. The coordinator shall also take into","account additional guidelines established","by the air transport industry Union -wide or","world-wide as well as local guidelines","proposed by the coordination committee","and approved by the Member State or any","other competent body responsible for the","airport in question, provided that such","guidelines do not affect the independent","status of the coordinator, comply with","Union law, aim at improving the efficient","use of airport capacity and have been","notified in advance to and pre-approved by","the Commission . The local guidelines may","only concern the monitoring of the use of","slots allocated or the amendment of the","definition of a series of slots to reduce its","length below 10 slots for the winter","scheduling period or below 15 slots for the","summer scheduling period, but under no","circumstances below 5 slots. The","reduction of the length of the series of","slots applies only at airports where","demand for air services is highly","seasonable."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"191","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" J\u00f6rg Leichtfried","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-192","justification":" Local rules exist and are essential to allow taking into account of specific/local circumstances\n at a given airport (for example, environment, accessibility, geographical diversity, special\n weather conditions). This would provide flexibility for the specific needs of the individual\n airlines and airports. This would fully support the principle of making the best use of existing\n capacity.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 9 \u2013 paragraph 8"]],"meps":[28251],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:49"},"new":["8. The coordinator shall also take into","account additional guidelines established","by the air transport industry Union -wide or","world-wide as well as local guidelines","proposed by the coordination committee","and approved by the Member State or any","other competent body responsible for the","airport in question, provided that such","guidelines do not affect the independent","status of the coordinator, comply with","Union law, aim at improving the efficient","use of airport capacity. Local Rules","concern the allocation and monitoring of","slots. These can be applied where","performance or throughput improvements","can be delivered through locally applied","rules, these must be transparent and non-","discriminatory."],"old":["8. The coordinator shall also take into","account additional guidelines established","by the air transport industry Union -wide or","world-wide as well as local guidelines","proposed by the coordination committee","and approved by the Member State or any","other competent body responsible for the","airport in question, provided that such","guidelines do not affect the independent","status of the coordinator, comply with","Union law, aim at improving the efficient","use of airport capacity and have been","notified in advance to and pre-approved","by the Commission. The local guidelines","may only concern the monitoring of the","use of slots allocated or the amendment of","the definition of a series of slots to reduce","its length below 10 slots for the winter","scheduling period or below 15 slots for the","summer scheduling period, but under no","circumstances below 5 slots. The","reduction of the length of the series of","slots applies only at airports where","demand for air services is highly","seasonable."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"192","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Dominique Riquet","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-193","justification":"The Commission\u2019s approval, which is needed in order to ensure overall consistency, must not\nreduce either flexibility or responsiveness, which are the main reasons for having local\nguidelines in the first place.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 9 \u2013 paragraph 8"]],"meps":[96885],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:49"},"new":["8. The coordinator shall also take into","account additional guidelines established","by the air transport industry Union-wide or","world-wide as well as local guidelines","proposed by the coordination committee","and approved by the Member State or any","other competent body responsible for the","airport in question, provided that such","guidelines do not affect the independent","status of the coordinator, comply","with Union law, aim at improving the","efficient use of airport capacity and have","been notified in advance to and","pre-approved by the Commission within a","reasonable timeframe, especially in","urgent circumstances."],"old":["8. The coordinator shall also take into","account additional guidelines established","by the air transport industry world-wide or","Union -wide as well as local guidelines","proposed by the coordination committee","and approved by the Member State or any","other competent body responsible for the","airport in question, provided that such","guidelines do not affect the independent","status of the coordinator, comply with","Union law, aim at improving the efficient","use of airport capacity and have been","notified in advance to and pre-approved by","the Commission . The local guidelines","may only concern the supervision of the","use of slots allocated or the amendment of","the definition of the series of slots for","reducing its length below 10 slots for the","winter scheduling period or below 15 slots","for the summer scheduling period, but","under no circumstances below 5 slots. The","reduction of the length of the series of slots","applies only in airports where demand for","air services is highly seasonable."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"193","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-194","justification":" It is important in view of the specific characteristics of certain airports, that local guidelines\n can still be used to alter the allocation of time slots.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 9 \u2013 paragraph 8"]],"meps":[97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:50"},"new":["8. The coordinator shall also take into","account additional guidelines established","by the air transport industry world-wide or","Union -wide as well as local guidelines","proposed by the coordination committee","and approved by the Member State or any","other competent body responsible for the","airport in question, provided that such","guidelines do not affect the independent","status of the coordinator, comply with","Union law, aim at improving the efficient","use of airport capacity and have been","notified in advance to and pre-approved by","the Commission . The local guidelines","shall concern the allocation of slots,","supervision of the use of slots allocated","and the amendment of the definition of the","series of slots, but under no circumstances","below 5 slots. The reduction of the length","of the series of slots applies only in airports","where demand for air services is highly","seasonable."],"old":["8. The coordinator shall also take into","account additional guidelines established","by the air transport industry world-wide or","Union -wide as well as local guidelines","proposed by the coordination committee","and approved by the Member State or any","other competent body responsible for the","airport in question, provided that such","guidelines do not affect the independent","status of the coordinator, comply with","Union law, aim at improving the efficient","use of airport capacity and have been","notified in advance to and pre-approved by","the Commission . The local guidelines may","only concern the supervision of the use of","slots allocated or the amendment of the","definition of the series of slots for","reducing its length below 10 slots for the","winter scheduling period or below 15 slots","for the summer scheduling period, but","under no circumstances below 5 slots. The","reduction of the length of the series of slots","applies only in airports where demand for","air services is highly seasonable."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"194","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-195","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 9 \u2013 paragraph 8"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:50"},"new":["8. The coordinator shall also take into","account additional guidelines established","by the air transport industry Union -wide or","world-wide as well as local guidelines","proposed by the coordination committee","and approved by the Member State or any","other competent body responsible for the","airport in question, provided that such","guidelines do not affect the independent","status of the coordinator, comply with","Union law, aim at improving the efficient","use of airport capacity and have been","notified in advance to and pre-approved by","the Commission . The local guidelines may","concern the monitoring of the use of slots","allocated or the determination of capacity.","The increase of the length of the series of","slots applies only after an impact analysis","at airports where demand for air services is","highly seasonable."],"old":["8. The coordinator shall also take into","account additional guidelines established","by the air transport industry Union -wide or","world-wide as well as local guidelines","proposed by the coordination committee","and approved by the Member State or any","other competent body responsible for the","airport in question, provided that such","guidelines do not affect the independent","status of the coordinator, comply with","Union law, aim at improving the efficient","use of airport capacity and have been","notified in advance to and pre-approved by","the Commission . The local guidelines may","only concern the monitoring of the use of","slots allocated or the amendment of the","definition of a series of slots to reduce its","length below 10 slots for the winter","scheduling period or below 15 slots for the","summer scheduling period, but under no","circumstances below 5 slots. The","reduction of the length of the series of","slots applies only at airports where demand","for air services is highly seasonable."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"195","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Michael Gahler, Markus Ferber","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-196","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 9 \u2013 paragraph 8"]],"meps":[2341,1917],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:50"},"new":["8. The coordinator shall also take into","account additional guidelines established","by the air transport industry Union -wide or","world-wide as well as local guidelines","proposed by the coordination committee","and approved by the Member State or any","other competent body responsible for the","airport in question, provided that such","guidelines do not affect the independent","status of the coordinator, comply with","Union law, aim at improving the efficient","use of airport capacity and have been","notified in advance to and pre-approved by","the Commission . The local guidelines may","only concern the monitoring of the use of","slots allocated or the determination of","capacity."],"old":["8. The coordinator shall also take into","account additional guidelines established","by the air transport industry Union -wide or","world-wide as well as local guidelines","proposed by the coordination committee","and approved by the Member State or any","other competent body responsible for the","airport in question, provided that such","","guidelines do not affect the independent","status of the coordinator, comply with","Union law, aim at improving the efficient","use of airport capacity and have been","notified in advance to and pre-approved by","the Commission . The local guidelines may","only concern the monitoring of the use of","slots allocated or the amendment of the","definition of a series of slots to reduce its","length below 10 slots for the winter","scheduling period or below 15 slots for the","summer scheduling period, but under no","circumstances below 5 slots. The","reduction of the length of the series of","slots applies only at airports where","demand for air services is highly","seasonable."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"196","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" In\u00e9s Ayala Sender","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-197","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 9 \u2013 paragraph 8"]],"meps":[28292],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:50"},"new":["8. The coordinator shall also take into","account additional guidelines established","by the air transport industry Union -wide or","world-wide as well as local guidelines","proposed by the coordination committee","and approved by the Member State or any","other competent body responsible for the","airport in question, provided that such","guidelines do not affect the independent","status of the coordinator, comply with","Union law, aim at improving the efficient","use of airport capacity and have been","notified in advance to and pre-approved by","the Commission. Local Rules may concern","monitoring of slots as well as allocation","only where demand is highly seasonable.","These can be applied where performance","or throughput improvements can be","delivered through locally applied rules,","these must be transparent and non-","discriminatory."],"old":["8. The coordinator shall also take into","account additional guidelines established","by the air transport industry Union -wide or","world-wide as well as local guidelines","proposed by the coordination committee","and approved by the Member State or any","other competent body responsible for the","airport in question, provided that such","guidelines do not affect the independent","status of the coordinator, comply with","Union law, aim at improving the efficient","use of airport capacity and have been","notified in advance to and pre-approved by","the Commission. The local guidelines may","only concern the monitoring of the use of","slots allocated or the amendment of the","definition of a series of slots to reduce its","length below 10 slots for the winter","","scheduling period or below 15 slots for the","summer scheduling period, but under no","circumstances below 5 slots. The","reduction of the length of the series of","slots applies only at airports where","demand for air services is highly","seasonable."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"197","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-198","justification":" Local rules are essential to allow taking into account of local circumstances at a given\n airport (e.g, accessibility, geographical diversity, special weather conditions). Any deviation\n from the standard slot series could be discussed amongst members of the airport\u2019s\n coordination committee and addressed through a local rule, providing flexibility for the\n specific needs of the individual airlines and airports. This would fully support the principle of\n making the best use of existing capacity.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 9 \u2013 paragraph 8"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:50"},"new":["8. The coordinator shall also take into","account additional guidelines established","by the air transport industry Union -wide or","world-wide as well as local guidelines","proposed by the coordination committee","and approved by the Member State or any","other competent body responsible for the","airport in question, provided that such","guidelines do not affect the independent","status of the coordinator, comply with","Union law, aim at improving the efficient","use of airport capacity. Local Rules","concern the allocation and monitoring of","slots. These can be applied where","performance or throughput improvements","can be delivered through locally applied","rules, these must be transparent and non-","discriminatory."],"old":["8. The coordinator shall also take into","account additional guidelines established","by the air transport industry Union -wide or","world-wide as well as local guidelines","proposed by the coordination committee","and approved by the Member State or any","other competent body responsible for the","airport in question, provided that such","guidelines do not affect the independent","status of the coordinator, comply with","Union law, aim at improving the efficient","use of airport capacity and have been","notified in advance to and pre-approved","by the Commission. The local guidelines","may only concern the monitoring of the","use of slots allocated or the amendment of","the definition of a series of slots to reduce","its length below 10 slots for the winter","scheduling period or below 15 slots for the","summer scheduling period, but under no","circumstances below 5 slots. The","reduction of the length of the series of","slots applies only at airports where","demand for air services is highly","seasonable."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"198","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-199","justification":"Local rules do exist and are essential to allow to take into account specific/local\ncircumstances at a given airport (for example, environment, accessibility, geographical\ndiversity, special weather conditions). However, those rules can be applied only under\nspecific circumstances and after agreement of all parties concerned in order to avoid abuse.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 9 \u2013 paragraph 8"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:50"},"new":["8. The coordinator shall also take into","account additional guidelines established","by the air transport industry world-wide or","Union-wide as well as local guidelines","proposed by the coordination committee","and approved by the Member State or any","other competent body responsible for the","airport in question, provided that such","guidelines do not affect the independent","status of the coordinator, comply with","Union law, aim at improving the efficient","use of airport capacity. Local Rules","concern the allocation and monitoring of","slots. These can be applied only where it","can be proved that an airport reaches an","alarming level of congestion and","therefore performance or throughput","improvements can be delivered through","locally applied rules. These must be","transparent and non-discriminatory.","Local rules must be agreed and voted on","in the coordination committee after","agreement of all parties concerned, as","referred to in Article 8 paragraph 3 of this","Regulation."],"old":["8. The coordinator shall also take into","account additional guidelines established","by the air transport industry Union -wide","or world-wide as well as local guidelines","proposed by the coordination committee","and approved by the Member State or any","other competent body responsible for the","airport in question, provided that such","guidelines do not affect the independent","status of the coordinator, comply with","Union law, aim at improving the efficient","use of airport capacity and have been","notified in advance to and pre-approved","by the Commission. The local guidelines","may only concern the monitoring of the","use of slots allocated or the amendment of","the definition of a series of slots to reduce","its length below 10 slots for the winter","scheduling period or below 15 slots for the","summer scheduling period, but under no","circumstances below 5 slots. The","reduction of the length of the series of","slots applies only at airports where","demand for air services is highly","seasonable."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"199","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-200","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 1"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:50"},"new":["1. Series of slots are allocated from the slot","pool by the coordinator with the utmost","transparency and fairness to applicant","carriers as permissions to use the airport","infrastructure for the purpose of landing or","take-off for the scheduling period for","which they are requested, at the expiry of","which they have to be returned to the slot","pool as set up according to the provisions","of Article 9."],"old":["1. Series of slots are allocated from the slot","pool to applicant carriers as permissions to","use the airport infrastructure for the","purpose of landing or take-off for the","scheduling period for which they are","requested, at the expiry of which they have","to be returned to the slot pool as set up","according to the provisions of Article 9."],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"200","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Eva Lichtenberger","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-201","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 1 a (new)"]],"meps":[28253],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:50"},"new":["1a. Slots are non-material assets of public","utility. They are assigned by airport","coordinators so as to ensure maximum","transparency, in the interests of Member","Sates, citizens living near to the airport,","passengers, airport managers, air carriers","and airport employees and workers."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"201","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Christine De Veyrac","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-202","justification":" The concept of \u2018priority\u2019 introduced by the Commission could lead to differing interpretations\n and hence uncertainty. The concept of \u2018entitlement\u2019 used in Regulation (EEC) No 95/93\n should therefore be maintained.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 introductory part"]],"meps":[4347],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:50"},"new":["2. Without prejudice to Articles 7, 12, 13","and 17, entitlement is to be granted to the","air carrier concerned for the allocation of","the same series during the following","equivalent scheduling period, if that air","carrier so requests within the time-limit","mentioned in Article 7(1), if the following","conditions are satisfied:"],"old":["2. Without prejudice to Articles 7, 12, 13","and 17, priority is to be given to the air","carrier concerned for the allocation of the","same series during the following equivalent","scheduling period, if that air carrier so","requests within the time-limit mentioned in","Article 7(1), if the following conditions are","satisfied:"],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"202","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-203","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 introductory part"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:50"},"new":["2. Without prejudice to Articles 7 and 12,","historical precedence is to be given to the","air carrier concerned for the allocation of","the same series during the following","equivalent scheduling period, if that air","carrier so requests within the time-limit","mentioned in Article 7(1), if the following","conditions are satisfied:"],"old":["2. Without prejudice to Articles 7, 12, 13","and 17, priority is to be given to the air","carrier concerned for the allocation of the","same series during the following equivalent","scheduling period, if that air carrier so","requests within the time-limit mentioned in","Article 7(1), if the following conditions are","satisfied:"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"203","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-204","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 point a"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:50"},"new":["a) a series of slots has been used by that","air carrier, and"],"old":["a) a series of slots has been used by that","air carrier for the operation of scheduled","and programmed non-scheduled air","services, and"],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"204","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Marian-Jean Marinescu","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-205","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 point a"]],"meps":[33982],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:50"},"new":["(a) a series of slots has been used by that","air carrier, and"],"old":["(a) a series of slots has been used by that","air carrier for the operation of scheduled","and programmed non-scheduled air","services, and"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"205","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Christine De Veyrac, Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-206","justification":" Raising the slot series usage rate to 85% seems excessive and is not an appropriate answer to\n congestion problems. This rate would also lead to carriers \u2018flying empty\u2019 in order not to lose\n their series allocation, which is hardly in keeping with the overriding need to address the\n environmental impact of this mode of transport. The rate would therefore seem to be of little\n economic or environmental benefit. An 80-20 ratio should therefore be maintained for series\n usage rates.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 point b"]],"meps":[4347,97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:50"},"new":["b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the","satisfaction of the coordinator that the","series of slots in question has been","operated, as cleared by the coordinator, by","that air carrier for at least 80 % of the time","during the scheduling period for which it","has been allocated."],"old":["b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the","satisfaction of the coordinator that the","","","series of slots in question has been","operated, as cleared by the coordinator, by","that air carrier for at least 85 % of the time","during the scheduling period for which it","has been allocated."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"206","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Eva Lichtenberger","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-207","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 point b"]],"meps":[28253],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:50"},"new":["(b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the","satisfaction of the coordinator that the","series of slots in question has been","operated, as cleared by the coordinator, by","that air carrier for at least 80 % of the time","during the scheduling period for which it","has been allocated."],"old":["(b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the","satisfaction of the coordinator that the","series of slots in question has been","operated, as cleared by the coordinator, by","that air carrier for at least 85 % of the time","during the scheduling period for which it","has been allocated."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"207","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Petra Kammerevert","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-208","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 point b"]],"meps":[96837],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:51"},"new":["(b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the","satisfaction of the coordinator that the","series of slots in question has been","operated, as cleared by the coordinator, by","that air carrier for at least 80 % of the time","during the scheduling period for which it","has been allocated."],"old":["(b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the","satisfaction of the coordinator that the","series of slots in question has been","operated, as cleared by the coordinator, by","that air carrier for at least 85 % of the time","during the scheduling period for which it","has been allocated."],"orig_lang":"de","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"208","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Vilja Savisaar-Toomast","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-209","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 point b"]],"meps":[97308],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:51"},"new":["(b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the","satisfaction of the coordinator that the","series of slots in question has been","operated, as cleared by the coordinator, by","that air carrier for at least 80 % of the time","during the scheduling period for which it","has been allocated."],"old":["(b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the","satisfaction of the coordinator that the","series of slots in question has been","operated, as cleared by the coordinator, by","that air carrier for at least 85 % of the time","during the scheduling period for which it","has been allocated."],"orig_lang":"et","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"209","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Dominique Riquet","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-210","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 point b"]],"meps":[96885],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:51"},"new":["b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the","satisfaction of the coordinator that the","series of slots in question has been","operated, as cleared by the coordinator, by","that air carrier for at least 80 % of the time","during the scheduling period for which it","has been allocated."],"old":["b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the","satisfaction of the coordinator that the","series of slots in question has been","operated, as cleared by the coordinator, by","that air carrier for at least 85 % of the time","","during the scheduling period for which it","has been allocated."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"210","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Marian-Jean Marinescu","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-211","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 point b"]],"meps":[33982],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:51"},"new":["(b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the","satisfaction of the coordinator that the","series of slots in question has been","operated, as cleared by the coordinator, by","that air carrier for at least 80 % of the time","during the scheduling period for which it","has been allocated."],"old":["(b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the","satisfaction of the coordinator that the","series of slots in question has been","operated, as cleared by the coordinator, by","that air carrier for at least 85 % of the time","during the scheduling period for which it","has been allocated."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"211","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-212","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 point b"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:51"},"new":["(b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the","satisfaction of the coordinator that the","series of slots in question has been","operated, as cleared by the coordinator, by","that air carrier for at least 80 % of the time","during the scheduling period for which it","has been allocated."],"old":["(b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the","satisfaction of the coordinator that the","series of slots in question has been","operated, as cleared by the coordinator, by","that air carrier for at least 85 % of the time","during the scheduling period for which it","has been allocated."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"212","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Michael Gahler, Corien Wortmann-Kool","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-213","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 point b"]],"meps":[96810,96733,28393,2341,28167],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:51"},"new":["(b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the","satisfaction of the coordinator that the","series of slots in question has been","operated, as cleared by the coordinator, by","that air carrier for at least 80 % of the time","during the scheduling period for which it","has been allocated."],"old":["(b) that air carrier can demonstrate to the","satisfaction of the coordinator that the","series of slots in question has been","operated, as cleared by the coordinator, by","that air carrier for at least 85 % of the time","during the scheduling period for which it","has been allocated."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"213","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-214","justification":"Non-scheduled air transportation plays a role in providing links to and from the less\naccessible regions of Europe contributing to their development. Such regions are often poorly\nserved by scheduled operations. The positive contributions of other air transportation\ntherefore deserves to be recognised, slots that have regularly been used for such flights,\n\n should like other slots be used 80% of the time benefit from preferential treatment by the\n coordinators.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 2 a (new)"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:51"},"new":["(2a) Non-scheduled air transportation","contributes to regional cohesion and","competitiveness. Where air carriers have","regularly used slots for such","transportation at an airport falling within","the scope of this regulation, even where","these slots do not always involve the same","routes, priority shall be given to requests","for continued usage of such slots."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"214","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-215","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 3"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:51"},"new":["3. Re-timing of series of slots before the","allocation of the remaining slots from the","pool referred to in Article 9 to the other","applicant air carriers shall be accepted only","for operational reasons such as, changes in","the type of aircraft used or route operated","by the air carrier. It shall not take effect","until expressly confirmed by the","coordinator or, in the case of series of slots","allocated to new entrants as defined in","Article 2, if the slot timing for those","requesting air carriers is better than the","slot timing originally requested . It shall","not take effect until expressly confirmed by","the coordinator."],"old":["3. Re-timing of series of slots before the","allocation of the remaining slots from the","pool referred to in Article 9 to the other","applicant air carriers shall be accepted only","for operational reasons such as, changes in","the type of aircraft used or route operated","by the air carrier . It shall not take effect","until expressly confirmed by the","coordinator."],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"215","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-216","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 3"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:51"},"new":["3. Re-timing of a series of slots before the","allocation of the remaining slots from the","pool referred to in Article 9 to the other","applicant air carriers shall be accepted only","for operational reasons such as changes in","the type of aircraft used or route operated","by the air carrier or, in the case of slots","originally allocated to new entrants as","defined in Article 2, if the slot timings of","such applicant air carriers would be","improved in relation to the timings","initially requested. It shall not take effect","until expressly confirmed by the","coordinator."],"old":["3. Re-timing of series of slots before the","allocation of the remaining slots from the","pool referred to in Article 9 to the other","applicant air carriers shall be accepted only","for operational reasons such as, changes in","the type of aircraft used or route operated","by the air carrier. It shall not take effect","","until expressly confirmed by the","coordinator."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"216","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Michael Gahler","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-217","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 4 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[96810,96733,28393,2341],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:51"},"new":["Slots allocated to an air carrier on or before","the agreed Industry Historics Baseline","Date, but which are returned to the","coordinator for reallocation before those","dates, shall not be taken into account for","the purposes of the usage calculation,","provided that the remaining allocated slots","can be recognised as being part of a series","within the meaning of Article 2(13)."],"old":["Slots allocated to an air carrier before 31","January for the following summer season,","or before 31 August for the following","winter season, but which are returned to","the coordinator for reallocation before","those dates, shall not be taken into account","for the purposes of the usage calculation","provided that the remaining allocated slots","constitute a series within the meaning of","Article 2(13)."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"217","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Dominique Riquet, Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-218","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 4 \u2013 subparagraph 2"]],"meps":[96885,97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:51"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["Slots coinciding with public holidays shall","be incorporated into the series for the","following season without any need to","justify their non-use."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"218","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-219","justification":" This should not be a valid reason to wave the use it or lose it rule at the expense of the\n airport. In practice, this provision would be impossible to implement as holidays vary\n considerably across Europe.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 4 \u2013 subparagraph 2"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:51"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["Slots coinciding with public holidays shall","be incorporated into the series for the","following season without any need to","justify their non-use."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"219","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian, Michael Gahler","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-220","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 4 \u2013 subparagraph 2"]],"meps":[96810,96733,2341],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:51"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["Slots coinciding with public holidays shall","be incorporated into the series for the","following season without any need to","justify their non-use."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"220","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Christine De Veyrac, Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-221","justification":"Raising the slot series usage rate to 85% seems excessive and is not an appropriate answer to\ncongestion problems. This rate would also lead to carriers \u2018flying empty\u2019 in order not to lose\ntheir series allocation, which is hardly in keeping with the overriding need to address the\nenvironmental impact of this mode of transport. The rate would therefore seem to be of little\neconomic or environmental benefit. An 80-20 ratio should therefore be maintained for series\nusage rates.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 5 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 introductory part"]],"meps":[4347,97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:51"},"new":["If the 80 % usage of the series of slots","cannot be demonstrated, the priority","provided under paragraph (2) shall not be","given , unless the non-utilisation can be","justified on the basis of any of the","following reasons:"],"old":["If the 85 % usage of the series of slots","cannot be demonstrated, the priority","provided under paragraph (2) shall not be","given , unless the non-utilisation can be","justified on the basis of any of the","following reasons:"],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"221","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Eva Lichtenberger","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-222","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 5 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 introductory part"]],"meps":[28253],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:51"},"new":["If the 80 % usage of the series of slots","cannot be demonstrated, the priority","provided under paragraph (2) shall not be","given , unless the non-utilisation can be","justified on the basis of any of the","following reasons:"],"old":["If the 85 % usage of the series of slots","cannot be demonstrated, the priority","provided under paragraph (2) shall not be","given , unless the non-utilisation can be","justified on the basis of any of the","following reasons:"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"222","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Petra Kammerevert","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-223","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 5 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 introductory part"]],"meps":[96837],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:51"},"new":["If the 80 % usage of the series of slots","cannot be demonstrated, the priority","provided under paragraph (2) shall not be","given , unless the non-utilisation can be","justified on the basis of any of the","following reasons:"],"old":["If the 85 % usage of the series of slots","cannot be demonstrated, the priority","provided under paragraph (2) shall not be","given , unless the non-utilisation can be","justified on the basis of any of the","following reasons:"],"orig_lang":"de","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"223","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Vilja Savisaar-Toomast","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-224","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 5 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 introductory part"]],"meps":[97308],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:51"},"new":["If the 80 % usage of the series of slots","cannot be demonstrated, the priority","provided under paragraph (2) shall not be","given, unless the non-utilisation can be","justified on the basis of any of the","following reasons:"],"old":["If the 85 % usage of the series of slots","cannot be demonstrated, the priority","provided under paragraph (2) shall not be","given, unless the non-utilisation can be","justified on the basis of any of the","following reasons:"],"orig_lang":"et","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"224","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Dominique Riquet","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-225","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 5 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 introductory part"]],"meps":[96885],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:52"},"new":["If the 80 % usage of the series of slots","cannot be demonstrated, the priority","provided under paragraph (2) shall not be","given , unless the non-utilisation can be","justified on the basis of any of the","following reasons:"],"old":["If the 85 % usage of the series of slots","cannot be demonstrated, the priority","provided under paragraph (2) shall not be","given , unless the non-utilisation can be","justified on the basis of any of the","","following reasons:"],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"225","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Marian-Jean Marinescu","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-226","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 5 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 introductory part"]],"meps":[33982],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:52"},"new":["If the 80 % usage of the series of slots","cannot be demonstrated, the priority","provided under paragraph (2) shall not be","given , unless the non-utilisation can be","justified on the basis of any of the","following reasons:"],"old":["If the 85 % usage of the series of slots","cannot be demonstrated, the priority","provided under paragraph (2) shall not be","given , unless the non-utilisation can be","justified on the basis of any of the","following reasons:"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"226","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-227","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 5 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 introductory part"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:52"},"new":["If the 80 % usage of the series of slots","cannot be demonstrated, the priority","provided under paragraph (2) shall not be","given , unless the non-utilisation can be","justified on the basis of any of the","following reasons:"],"old":["If the 85 % usage of the series of slots","cannot be demonstrated, the priority","provided under paragraph (2) shall not be","given , unless the non-utilisation can be","justified on the basis of any of the","following reasons:"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"227","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Michael Gahler, Corien Wortmann-Kool","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-228","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 5 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 introductory part"]],"meps":[96810,96733,28393,2341,28167],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:52"},"new":["If the 80 % usage of the series of slots","cannot be demonstrated, the historical","precedence provided under paragraph (2)","shall not be given , unless the non-","utilisation can be justified on the basis of","any of the following reasons:"],"old":["If the 85 % usage of the series of slots","cannot be demonstrated, the priority","provided under paragraph (2) shall not be","given , unless the non-utilisation can be","justified on the basis of any of the","following reasons:"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"228","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-229","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 5 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 point a \u2013 point iii"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:52"},"new":["iii) serious disturbance of operations at the","airports concerned, including those series","of slots at other airports related to routes","which have been affected by such","disturbance, during a substantial part of the","relevant scheduling period;"],"old":["iii) serious disturbance of operations at the","airports concerned, including those series","of slots at other Union airports related to","routes which have been affected by such","disturbance, during a substantial part of the","relevant scheduling period;"],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"229","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian, Michael Gahler","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-230","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 5 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 point a \u2013 point iii"]],"meps":[96810,96733,2341],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:52"},"new":["(iii) serious disturbance of operations at the","airports concerned, including those series","of slots at other airports related to routes","which have been affected by such","disturbance, during a substantial part of the","relevant scheduling period;"],"old":["(iii) serious disturbance of operations at the","airports concerned, including those series","of slots at other Union airports related to","routes which have been affected by such","disturbance, during a substantial part of the","","relevant scheduling period;"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"230","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-231","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 5 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 point c"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:52"},"new":["c) serious financial damage for an air","carrier concerned, resulting in the granting","of a temporary licence by the licensing","authorities pending financial reorganisation","of the air carrier in accordance with Article","9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008;"],"old":["c) serious financial damage for a Union","air carrier concerned, resulting in the","granting of a temporary licence by the","licensing authorities pending financial","reorganisation of the air carrier in","accordance with Article 9(1) of Regulation","(EC) No 1008/2008;"],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"231","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian, Michael Gahler","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-232","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 5 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 point c"]],"meps":[96810,96733,2341],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:52"},"new":["(c) serious financial difficulties for an air","carrier concerned, resulting in the granting","of a temporary licence by the licensing","authorities pending financial reorganisation","of the air carrier in accordance with Article","9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008;"],"old":["(c) serious financial difficulties of the","Union air carrier concerned, resulting in","the granting of a temporary licence by the","licensing authorities pending financial","reorganisation of the air carrier in","accordance with Article 9(1) of Regulation","(EC) No 1008/2008;"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"232","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-233","justification":" Giving the Commission the power to waive use-it-or-lose-it could dilute the effectiveness of\n this rule. Presently the Commission cannot suspend the rule without the Council's and\n Parliament's agreement. Appropriate safeguards should be included regarding the use of this\n power, e.g a requirement for a full impact assessment of the effect on competition and\n consumers, airports suffer flight cancellations, stronger airlines are denied the chance to take\n over slots from weaker airlines.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 7"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:52"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["7. If the conditions set out in paragraph","(2)(a) and (b) are not met, the","Commission may however decide that","priority for the allocation of the same","series should be awarded to the air","carriers for the following scheduling","period, if this is justified on imperative","grounds of urgency linked to exceptional","events requiring coherence in the","application of measures to be taken in","these airports. The Commission shall","adopt the necessary measures, the","application of which shall not exceed the","length of one scheduling period. It shall","adopt these immediately applicable","implementing acts in accordance with the","procedure referred to in Article 16(3)."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"233","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Christine De Veyrac","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-234","justification":"Relaxing the 80-20 rule would seem to be enough to address exceptional events. However, it\nshould be specified that the measures can only be applied to a given region for a temporary\nperiod. They should not necessarily have uniform, pan-European effect. A degree of flexibility\nis therefore necessary.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 7"]],"meps":[4347],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:52"},"new":["7. If the conditions set out in paragraph","(2)(a) and (b) are not met, the Commission,","in consultation with the various partners,","may however decide that entitlements for","the allocation of the same series should be","maintained for the air carriers for the","following scheduling period, if this is","justified on imperative grounds of urgency","linked to exceptional events requiring","coherence in the application of measures to","be taken in these airports. The","Commission, within one month of the","Member State or airport concerned","having so requested, shall adopt the","necessary measures, the application of","which shall not exceed the length of one","scheduling period. It shall adopt these","immediately applicable implementing acts","in accordance with the procedure referred","to in Article 16(3). The measures adopted","by the European Commission may differ","according to the Member State, airport or","type of airline services concerned by the","exceptional event in question."],"old":["7. If the conditions set out in paragraph","(2)(a) and (b) are not met, the Commission","","","may however decide that priority for the","allocation of the same series should be","awarded to the air carriers for the","following scheduling period, if this is","justified on imperative grounds of urgency","linked to exceptional events requiring","coherence in the application of measures to","be taken in these airports. The Commission","shall adopt the necessary measures, the","application of which shall not exceed the","length of one scheduling period. It shall","adopt these immediately applicable","implementing acts in accordance with the","procedure referred to in Article 16(3)."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"234","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Silvia-Adriana \u0142ic\u0103u","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-235","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 7"]],"meps":[36281],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:52"},"new":["7. If the conditions set out in paragraph","(2)(a) and (b) are not met, the Commission","may however decide that priority for the","allocation of the same series should be","awarded to the air carriers for the following","scheduling period, if this is justified on","imperative grounds of urgency linked to","exceptional events or operational","stoppages requiring coherence in the","application of measures to be taken in these","airports. The Commission shall adopt the","necessary measures, the application of","which shall not exceed the length of one","scheduling period. It shall adopt these","immediately applicable implementing acts","in accordance with the procedure referred","to in Article 16(3)."],"old":["7. If the conditions set out in paragraph","(2)(a) and (b) are not met, the Commission","may however decide that priority for the","allocation of the same series should be","awarded to the air carriers for the following","","scheduling period, if this is justified on","imperative grounds of urgency linked to","exceptional events requiring coherence in","the application of measures to be taken in","these airports. The Commission shall adopt","the necessary measures, the application of","which shall not exceed the length of one","scheduling period. It shall adopt these","immediately applicable implementing acts","in accordance with the procedure referred","to in Article 16(3)."],"orig_lang":"ro","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"235","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian, Michael Gahler","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-236","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 \u2013 paragraph 7"]],"meps":[96810,96733,2341],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:52"},"new":["7. If the conditions set out in paragraph","(2)(a) and (b) are not met, the Commission","may however decide that priority for the","allocation of the same series should be","awarded to the air carriers for the following","scheduling period, if this is justified on","imperative grounds of urgency linked to","exceptional operational disruption","requiring coherence in the application of","measures to be taken in these airports. The","Commission shall adopt the necessary","measures, the application of which shall","not exceed the length of one scheduling","period. It shall adopt these immediately","applicable implementing acts in","accordance with the procedure referred to","in Article 16(3)."],"old":["7. If the conditions set out in paragraph","(2)(a) and (b) are not met, the Commission","may however decide that priority for the","allocation of the same series should be","awarded to the air carriers for the following","scheduling period, if this is justified on","imperative grounds of urgency linked to","exceptional events requiring coherence in","the application of measures to be taken in","these airports. The Commission shall adopt","the necessary measures, the application of","which shall not exceed the length of one","scheduling period. It shall adopt these","immediately applicable implementing acts","in accordance with the procedure referred","to in Article 16(3)."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"236","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Eva Lichtenberger","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-237","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 10 a (new)"]],"meps":[28253],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:53"},"new":["Article 10a","Auctioning of slots under a framework","environmental criteria.","The Commission shall propose a system","of auctioning slots under a framework of","environmental criteria, favorising","airplanes with best performance on","reduction of noise, gaseous emissions and","climate impact."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"237","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Christine De Veyrac","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-238","justification":" Its seems disproportionate to impose additional penalties for the late return of unused slots.\n It would seem to be sufficient to simply reinforce the ex-post penalty system provided for in\n Article 18 of the proposal. Introducing an administrative procedure of this type to create an\n ex-ante penalty would make things unnecessarily complicated for all the players involved. In\n\naddition to this, it seems difficult to assess what costs airports might be liable to incur.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 11"]],"meps":[4347],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:53"},"new":["Article 11 deleted","Slot reservation"],"old":["1. The managing body of a coordinated","airport may decide to use the airport","charge system with the aim of dissuading","air carriers from belatedly returning slots","to the pool referred to in Article 9 and to","hold them liable for having reserved","airport infrastructure without using it.","The following principles shall be","respected:","a) the procedure set out under Article 6 of","Directive 2009/12/EC of the European","Parliament and of the Council shall be","observed before this decision is taken. The","coordinator shall also be consulted. For","","coordinated airports not covered by","Article 1(2) of Directive 2009/12/EC, the","airport managing body shall consult the","coordination committee and the","coordinator;","b) this decision shall not affect the non-","discriminatory and transparent character","of the slot allocation process and the","system of airport charges;","c) this decision shall not discourage air","carriers from developing services or","entering the market and it shall be limited","to covering the costs incurred by the","airport for reserving the airport capacity","corresponding to the slots which remained","unused;","d) air carriers shall not be held liable for","having reserved airport infrastructure","without using it for slots allocated but","returned to the pool before 31 January for","the following summer scheduling period","or before 31 August for the following","winter scheduling period, for slots","coinciding with public holidays and","returned to the pool before the same dates","and for slots for which the non-use can be","justified on the basis of Article 10(5);","e) this decision shall be communicated to","the coordinator, the interested parties and","the Commission at least six months before","the start of the scheduling season","concerned.","2. The coordinator shall send the airport","managing body all the information","necessary for the implementation of the","decision referred to in the first paragraph."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"238","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-239","justification":" An ex-ante penalty system would create barriers to entering the market, which could\n undermine the competitiveness of European airline companies as a whole. This ex-ante\n system is a new outgoing which would penalise indiscriminately all air carriers \u2013 including\n those who comply with the rules. The focus should be on an ex-post system targeting airline\n companies which are not playing fair.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 11"]],"meps":[97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:53"},"new":["Article 11 deleted","Slot reservation"],"old":["1. The managing body of a coordinated","airport may decide to use the airport","charge system with the aim of dissuading","air carriers from belatedly returning slots","to the pool referred to in Article 9 and to","hold them liable for having reserved","airport infrastructure without using it.","The following principles shall be","respected:","a) the procedure set out under Article 6 of","Directive 2009/12/EC of the European","Parliament and of the Council shall be","observed before this decision is taken. The","coordinator shall also be consulted. For","coordinated airports not covered by","Article 1(2) of Directive 2009/12/EC, the","airport managing body shall consult the","coordination committee and the","coordinator;","b) this decision shall not affect the non-","discriminatory and transparent character","of the slot allocation process and the","system of airport charges;","c) this decision shall not discourage air","carriers from developing services or","entering the market and it shall be limited","to covering the costs incurred by the","airport for reserving the airport capacity","corresponding to the slots which remained","unused;","d) air carriers shall not be held liable for","having reserved airport infrastructure","","without using it for slots allocated but","returned to the pool before 31 January for","the following summer scheduling period","or before 31 August for the following","winter scheduling period, for slots","coinciding with public holidays and","returned to the pool before the same dates","and for slots for which the non-use can be","justified on the basis of Article 10(5);","e) this decision shall be communicated to","the coordinator, the interested parties and","the Commission at least six months before","the start of the scheduling season","concerned.","2. The coordinator shall send the airport","managing body all the information","necessary for the implementation of the","decision referred to in the first paragraph."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"239","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian, Michael Gahler","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-240","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 11"]],"meps":[96810,96733,2341],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:53"},"new":["Article 11 deleted","Slot reservation"],"old":["1. The managing body of a coordinated","airport may decide to use the airport","charge system with the aim of dissuading","air carriers from belatedly returning slots","to the pool referred to in Article 9 and to","","hold them liable for having reserved","airport infrastructure without using it.","The following principles shall be","respected:","(a) the procedure set out under Article 6","of Directive 2009/12/EC of the European","Parliament and of the Council shall be","observed before this decision is taken. The","coordinator shall also be consulted. For","coordinated airports not covered by","Article 1(2) of Directive 2009/12/EC, the","airport managing body shall consult the","coordination committee and the","coordinator;","(b) this decision shall not affect the non-","discriminatory and transparent character","of the slot allocation process and the","system of airport charges;","(c) this decision shall not discourage air","carriers from developing services or","entering the market and it shall be limited","to covering the costs incurred by the","airport for reserving the airport capacity","corresponding to the slots which remained","unused;","(d) air carriers shall not be held liable for","having reserved airport infrastructure","without using it for slots allocated but","returned to the pool before 31 January for","the following summer scheduling period","or before 31 August for the following","winter scheduling period, for slots","coinciding with public holidays and","returned to the pool before the same dates","and for slots for which the non-use can be","justified on the basis of Article 10(5);","(e) this decision shall be communicated to","the coordinator, the interested parties and","the Commission at least six months before","the start of the scheduling season","concerned.","2. The coordinator shall send the airport","managing body all the information","necessary for the implementation of the","decision referred to in the first paragraph."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"240","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Dominique Riquet","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-241","justification":"A penalty based on the value of airport services seems inappropriate in that those services are\nfluid and, above all, not yet set in stone at the time the slots are allocated.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 11 \u2013 paragraph 1"]],"meps":[96885],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:53"},"new":["Article 11 deleted","Slot reservation"],"old":["1. The managing body of a coordinated","airport may decide to use the airport","charge system with the aim of dissuading","air carriers from belatedly returning slots","to the pool referred to in Article 9 and to","hold them liable for having reserved","airport infrastructure without using it.","The following principles shall be","respected:","a) the procedure set out under Article 6 of","Directive 2009/12/EC of the European","Parliament and of the Council shall be","observed before this decision is taken. The","coordinator shall also be consulted. For","coordinated airports not covered by","Article 1(2) of Directive 2009/12/EC, the","airport managing body shall consult the","coordination committee and the","coordinator;","b) this decision shall not affect the non-","discriminatory and transparent character","of the slot allocation process and the","system of airport charges;","c) this decision shall not discourage air","carriers from developing services or","entering the market and it shall be limited","to covering the costs incurred by the","airport for reserving the airport capacity","corresponding to the slots which remained","unused;","d) air carriers shall not be held liable for","having reserved airport infrastructure","","without using it for slots allocated but","returned to the pool before 31 January for","the following summer scheduling period","or before 31 August for the following","winter scheduling period, for slots","coinciding with public holidays and","returned to the pool before the same dates","and for slots for which the non-use can be","justified on the basis of Article 10(5);","e) this decision shall be communicated to","the coordinator, the interested parties and","the Commission at least six months before","the start of the scheduling season","concerned.","2. The coordinator shall send the airport","managing body all the information","necessary for the implementation of the","decision referred to in the first paragraph."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"241","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Dominique Vlasto, Jim Higgins","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-242","justification":" The \u2018Use it or Lose it\u2019 rule and a potential ex-post penalty under Article 18 of the Regulation\n are enough to ensure the return of unused slots. Moreover, the creation of ex-ante penalties\n may create cash-flow problems for airline companies.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 11 \u2013 paragraph 1"]],"meps":[5737,28117],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:53"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["1. The managing body of a coordinated","airport may decide to use the airport","charge system with the aim of dissuading","air carriers from belatedly returning slots","to the pool referred to in Article 9 and to","hold them liable for having reserved","airport infrastructure without using it.","The following principles shall be","respected:","a) the procedure set out under Article 6 of","","Directive 2009/12/EC of the European","Parliament and of the Council shall be","observed before this decision is taken. The","coordinator shall also be consulted. For","coordinated airports not covered by","Article 1(2) of Directive 2009/12/EC, the","airport managing body shall consult the","coordination committee and the","coordinator;","b) this decision shall not affect the non-","discriminatory and transparent character","of the slot allocation process and the","system of airport charges;","c) this decision shall not discourage air","carriers from developing services or","entering the market and it shall be limited","to covering the costs incurred by the","airport for reserving the airport capacity","corresponding to the slots which remained","unused;","d) air carriers shall not be held liable for","having reserved airport infrastructure","without using it for slots allocated but","returned to the pool before 31 January for","the following summer scheduling period","or before 31 August for the following","winter scheduling period, for slots","coinciding with public holidays and","returned to the pool before the same dates","and for slots for which the non-use can be","justified on the basis of Article 10(5);","e) this decision shall be communicated to","the coordinator, the interested parties and","the Commission at least six months before","the start of the scheduling season","concerned."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"242","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Debora Serracchiani","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-243","justification":"Adding clarity and transparency to the airline community that this scheme is non-\ndiscriminatory, fair and transparent and does not generate additional income/ revenues for\nthe airport managing body.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 11 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 introductory part"]],"meps":[96865],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:53"},"new":["1. The managing body of a coordinated","airport may decide to use the airport","charges system with the aim of dissuading","air carriers from belatedly returning slots to","the pool referred to in Article 9 and to hold","them liable for having reserved airport","infrastructure without using it-the scheme","shall be revenue neutral for the airport","managing body. The following principles","shall be respected:"],"old":["1. The managing body of a coordinated","airport may decide to use the airport","charges system with the aim of dissuading","air carriers from belatedly returning slots to","the pool referred to in Article 9 and to hold","them liable for having reserved airport","infrastructure without using it. The","following principles shall be respected:"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"243","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-244","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 11 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 introductory part"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:53"},"new":["1. The managing body of a coordinated","airport shall introduce financial sanctions","imposed on air carriers that have belatedly","returning slots to the pool referred to in","Article 9 and to hold them liable for having","reserved airport infrastructure without","using it. The following principles shall be","respected."],"old":["1. The managing body of a coordinated","airport may decide to use the airport","charges system with the aim of dissuading","air carriers from belatedly returning slots","to the pool referred to in Article 9 and to","hold them liable for having reserved airport","infrastructure without using it. The","following principles shall be respected:"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"244","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Spyros Danellis","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-245","justification":" According to the impact assessment, slot reservation fees can be effective in deterring late\n handback of slots while at the same time revenue-neutral for airports.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 11 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point b"]],"meps":[99325],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:53"},"new":["(b) this decision shall not affect the non-","discriminatory and transparent character of","the slot allocation process and the system","of airport charges, and neither shall it","create additional net revenues for the","airport managing body;"],"old":["(b) this decision shall not affect the non-","discriminatory and transparent character of","the slot allocation process and the system","of airport charges;"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"245","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Spyros Danellis","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-246","justification":"Determining the appropriate level of the fee and monitoring compliance could create\nunnecessary complexity.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 11 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point c"]],"meps":[99325],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:53"},"new":["(c) this decision shall not discourage air","carriers from developing services or","entering the market;"],"old":["(c) this decision shall not discourage air","carriers from developing services or","entering the market and it shall be limited","to covering the costs incurred by the","airport for reserving the airport capacity","corresponding to the slots which remained","unused;"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"246","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"In\u00e9s Ayala Sender","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-247","justification":"It should be clearly stated, as a matter of principle, that the system of charges for reserving\ntime slots must not generate any profit over and above that made by the airport, and that its\naim is to help prevent the belated return of slots.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 11 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point e a (new)"]],"meps":[28292],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:53"},"new":["ea) the airport charge or incentive system","must not result in financial gain for the","airport management body and shall be","aimed solely at increasing the efficiency","of time slot allocation."],"orig_lang":"es","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"247","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"James Nicholson","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-248","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 12 \u2013 paragraph 1"]],"meps":[1318],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:53"},"new":["1. Where public service obligations have","been imposed on a route in accordance","with Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No","1008/2008, a Member State shall reserve","the slots required for the operations","envisaged on that route at a coordinated or","hub airport. If the reserved slots on the","route concerned are not used, they shall be","made available to any other air carrier","interested in operating the route in","accordance with the public service","obligations, subject to paragraph 2. If no","other carrier is interested in operating the","route and the Member State concerned","does not issue a call for tenders under","Article 16(10), Article 17(3) to (7), and","Article 18(1) of Regulation (EC) No","1008/2008, the slots shall either be","reserved for another route subject to public","service obligations or be returned to the","pool."],"old":["1. Where public service obligations have","been imposed on a route in accordance","with Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No","1008/2008, a Member State may reserve","the slots required for the operations","envisaged on that route at a coordinated","airport. If the reserved slots on the route","concerned are not used, they shall be made","available to any other air carrier interested","","in operating the route in accordance with","the public service obligations, subject to","paragraph 2. If no other carrier is interested","in operating the route and the Member","State concerned does not issue a call for","tenders under Article 16(10), Article 17(3)","to (7), and Article 18(1) of Regulation","(EC) No 1008/2008, the slots shall either","be reserved for another route subject to","public service obligations or be returned to","the pool."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"248","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-249","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 12 \u2013 paragraph 1"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:53"},"new":["1. Where public service obligations have","been imposed on a route in accordance","with Article16 of Regulation (EC) No","1008/2008, a Member State may reserve","the slots required for the operations","envisaged on that route at a coordinated","airport. If the reserved slots on the route","concerned are not used, they shall be made","available to any other air carrier interested","in operating the route in accordance with","the public service obligations, subject to","paragraph 2. If no other carrier is interested","in operating the route and the Member","State concerned does not issue a call for","tenders under Article 16(10), Article 17(3)","to (7), and Article 18(1) of Regulation","(EC) No 1008/2008, the slots shall either","be reserved for another route subject to","public service obligations or be returned to","the pool. Slots should be returned to the","pool when they are not being used after a","maximum period of 6 months. When a","route does not any longer meet the","requirement for Public Service","Obligations slots reservation, the slots are","either reserved for another route subject","to public service obligations or remain","with the air carrier which was using them","if the requirement of Article 10 (2) was","met for the series concerned."],"old":["1. Where public service obligations have","been imposed on a route in accordance","with Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No","1008/2008, a Member State may reserve","the slots required for the operations","envisaged on that route at a coordinated","airport. If the reserved slots on the route","concerned are not used, they shall be made","available to any other air carrier interested","in operating the route in accordance with","the public service obligations, subject to","paragraph 2. If no other carrier is interested","in operating the route and the Member","State concerned does not issue a call for","tenders under Article 16(10), Article 17(3)","to (7), and Article 18(1) of Regulation","(EC) No 1008/2008, the slots shall either","be reserved for another route subject to","public service obligations or be returned to","the pool.",""],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"249","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Christine De Veyrac, Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-250","justification":"The establishing of secondary trading creates too many uncertainties for EU airline\ncompanies and airports. The risk of seeing regional routes disappear at the expense of more\nprofitable routes, as well as the creation of a market in which not all the players are subject\nto the same financing rules, are further arguments against secondary trading. It would be\ninappropriate to help introduce differentiated rules in Europe by authorising the secondary\nmarket in certain Member States.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 13"]],"meps":[4347,97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:53"},"new":["Article 13 deleted"],"old":["Slot transfers and exchanges","1. Slots may be:","a) transferred by an air carrier from one","route or type of service to another route or","type of service operated by that same air","carrier;","b) transferred between two air carriers,","with or without monetary or any other","kind of compensation;","c) exchanged, one for one, between air","carriers, with or without monetary or any","other kind of compensation .","2. The Member State shall establish a","transparent framework to allow contact","between air carriers interested in","transferring or exchanging slots in","conformity with Union law.","The transfers or exchanges referred to in","paragraph 1 shall be notified to the","coordinator and shall not take effect until","expressly confirmed by the coordinator.","The coordinator shall decline to confirm","the transfers or exchanges if they are not","in conformity with the requirements of","","this Regulation and if the coordinator is","not satisfied that:","a) airport operations would not be","prejudiced, taking into account all","technical, operational , performance and","environmental constraints;","b) limitations imposed in accordance","with Article 12 are respected;","c) a transfer of slots does not fall within","the scope of paragraph 3 of this Article .","For the transfers or exchanges referred to","in paragraph 1(b) and (c), the air carriers","shall give the coordinator the details of","any monetary or any other kind of","compensation. The transfers or exchanges","may not be subject to conditions intended","to limit the possibility for the air carrier","wishing to obtain the slots from entering","into competition with the air carrier","which transfers or exchanges the slots.","3. Slots allocated to a new entrant as","defined in Article 2(2) may not be","transferred as provided for in paragraph","1(b) of this Article for a period of two","equivalent scheduling periods, except in","the case of a legally authorised takeover","of the activities of a bankrupt","undertaking.","Slots allocated to a new entrant as defined","in Article 2(2)(b) may not be transferred","to another route as provided for in","paragraph 1(a) of this Article for a period","of two equivalent scheduling periods","unless the new entrant would have been","treated with the same priority on the new","route as on the initial route.","Slots allocated to a new entrant as defined","in Article 2(2) may not be exchanged as","provided for in paragraph 1(c) of this","Article for a period of two equivalent","scheduling periods, except in order to","improve the slot timings for these services","in relation to the timings initially","requested."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"250","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-251","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 13 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point a"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:53"},"new":["(a) transferred by an air carrier or between","air carriers within a consortium from one","route or type of service to another route or","type of service operated by that same air","carrier;"],"old":["(a) transferred by an air carrier from one","route or type of service to another route or","type of service operated by that same air","carrier;"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"251","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Christine De Veyrac, Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-252","justification":" The establishing of secondary trading creates too many uncertainties for EU airline\n companies and airports. The risk of seeing regional routes disappear at the expense of more\n profitable routes, as well as the creation of a market in which not all the players are subject\n to the same financing rules, are further arguments against secondary trading. It would be\n inappropriate to help introduce differentiated rules in Europe by authorising the secondary\n market in certain Member States.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 13 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point b"]],"meps":[4347,97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:53"},"new":["b) transferred between two air carriers;"],"old":["b) transferred between two air carriers,","with or without monetary or any other","kind of compensation;"],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"252","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Dominique Riquet","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-253","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 13 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point b"]],"meps":[96885],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:53"},"new":["b) transferred between two air carriers,","without monetary compensation;"],"old":["b) transferred between two air carriers,","with or without monetary or any other","kind of compensation;"],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"253","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Christine De Veyrac, Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-254","justification":" The establishing of secondary trading creates too many uncertainties for EU airline\n companies and airports. The risk of seeing regional routes disappear at the expense of more\n profitable routes, as well as the creation of a market in which not all the players are subject\n to the same financing rules, are further arguments against secondary trading. It would be\n inappropriate to help introduce differentiated rules in Europe by authorising the secondary\n\nmarket in certain Member States.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 13 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point c"]],"meps":[4347,97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:53"},"new":["c) exchanged, one for one, between air","carriers."],"old":["c) exchanged, one for one, between air","carriers, with or without monetary or any","other kind of compensation ."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"254","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Dominique Riquet","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-255","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 13 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point c"]],"meps":[96885],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:54"},"new":["c) exchanged, one for one, between air","carriers, without monetary compensation."],"old":["c) exchanged, one for one, between air","carriers, with or without monetary or any","other kind of compensation ."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"255","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"James Nicholson","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-256","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 13 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point c a (new)"]],"meps":[1318],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:54"},"new":["(ca) subparagraphs a-c will operate","insofar as they do not jeopardise","connectivity between regional and hub","airports."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"256","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-257","justification":" The independent coordinator manages slot allocation and should therefore be the body\n responsible for managing the information exchange.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 13 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:54"},"new":["The coordinator shall establish a","transparent framework to allow contact","between air carriers interested in","transferring or exchanging slots in","conformity with Union law."],"old":["The Member State shall establish a","transparent framework to allow contact","between air carriers interested in","","","transferring or exchanging slots in","conformity with Union law."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"257","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Marian-Jean Marinescu","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-258","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 13 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[33982],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:54"},"new":["The coordinator shall establish a","transparent framework to allow contact","between air carriers interested in","transferring or exchanging slots in","conformity with Union law."],"old":["The Member State shall establish a","transparent framework to allow contact","between air carriers interested in","transferring or exchanging slots in","conformity with Union law."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"258","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Dominique Riquet","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-259","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 13 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[96885],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:54"},"new":["The coordinator shall establish a","transparent framework to allow contact","between air carriers interested in","transferring or exchanging slots in","conformity with Union law."],"old":["The Member State shall establish a","transparent framework to allow contact","between air carriers interested in","transferring or exchanging slots in","conformity with Union law."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"259","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-260","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 13 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 subparagraph 1 a (new)"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:54"},"new":["The Member State take steps to ensure","that 10% of the proceeds of the sale of the","time slots is paid into a fund for the","enlargement and infrastructural and","technological improvement of airports. In","the interests of complete transparency,","that fund shall be managed by a transport","supervisory authority as stipulated in","Directive 2009/12/EC. The fund must","always be managed in such a way as to","ensure that the principles of separate","accounting are followed, so that the","financial amounts to be allocated from","the fund to each airport can be","established."],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"260","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-261","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 13 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 subparagraph 2 \u2013 point a"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:54"},"new":["(a) airport operations would not be","prejudiced, taking into account all","technical, operational and environmental","constraints;"],"old":["(a) airport operations would not be","prejudiced, taking into account all","technical, operational, performance and","environmental constraints;"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"261","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Dominique Vlasto, Jim Higgins","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-262","justification":" It should not be possible to sell on a series of historical slots for a winter scheduling period\n unless these are for the next winter scheduling period. The idea here is to prevent speculation\n on the secondary slot market.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 13 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 subparagraph 2 a (new)"]],"meps":[5737,28117],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:54"},"new":["Transfers of historical slots for a","scheduling period that give rise to","financial payments may not be sold on","before the end of that scheduling period."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"262","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Christine De Veyrac, Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-263","justification":" The establishing of secondary trading creates too many uncertainties for EU airline\n companies and airports. The risk of seeing regional routes disappear at the expense of more\n profitable routes, as well as the creation of a market in which not all the players are subject\n to the same financing rules, are further arguments against secondary trading. It would be\n\ninappropriate to help introduce differentiated rules in Europe by authorising the secondary\nmarket in certain Member States.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 13 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 subparagraph 3"]],"meps":[4347,97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:54"},"new":["deleted"],"old":["For the transfers or exchanges referred to","in paragraph 1(b) and (c), the air carriers","shall give the coordinator the details of","any monetary or any other kind of","compensation. The transfers or exchanges","may not be subject to conditions intended","to limit the possibility for the air carrier","wishing to obtain the slots from entering","into competition with the air carrier","which transfers or exchanges the slots."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"263","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Spyros Danellis","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-264","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 13 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 subparagraph 3"]],"meps":[99325],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:54"},"new":["For the transfers or exchanges referred to","in paragraph 1(b) and (c), the air carriers","shall give the coordinator the details of any","monetary or any other kind of","compensation. The details regarding","compensation for the transfers or","exchanges are confidential and the","coordinator shall only divulge such details","to the Member State where the airport is","situated or the Commission, upon their","request. The transfers or exchanges may","not be subject to restrictive conditions","intended to limit the possibility for the air","carrier wishing to obtain the slots to enter","into competition with the air carrier which","transfers or exchanges the slots, or with","other members of a group of air carriers","that it is part of."],"old":["For the transfers or exchanges referred to","in paragraph 1(b) and (c), the air carriers","shall give the coordinator the details of any","monetary or any other kind of","compensation. The details regarding","compensation for the transfers or","exchanges are confidential and the","coordinator shall only divulge such details","to the Member State where the airport is","situated or the Commission, upon their","request. The transfers or exchanges may","not be subject to conditions intended to","limit the possibility for the air carrier","wishing to obtain the slots to enter into","competition with the air carrier which","transfers or exchanges the slots."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"264","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Jacqueline Foster","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-265","justification":" There is no reason why airlines should disclose the details, i.e. the price or other commercial\n considerations, of a traded slot to the coordinator, and therefore there is no need to give the\n coordinator these details. Parties to the same kind of transactions in other sectors are not\n under that obligation either. The fact that this constitutes a confidential business transaction\n is already recognised in Article 6.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 13 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 subparagraph 3"]],"meps":[4553],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:54"},"new":["For the transfers or exchanges referred to","in paragraph 1(b) and (c), the air carriers","shall give the coordinator the details of any","monetary or any other kind of","compensation. The transfers or exchanges","may not be subject to conditions intended","to limit the possibility for the air carrier","wishing to obtain the slots from entering","into competition with the air carrier which","transfers or exchanges the slots;"],"old":["For the transfers or exchanges referred to","in paragraph 1(b) and (c), the air carriers","shall give the coordinator the details of any","monetary or any other kind of","","compensation. The details regarding","compensation for the transfers or","exchanges are confidential and the","coordinator shall only divulge such details","to the Member State where the airport is","situated or the Commission, upon their","request. The transfers or exchanges may","not be subject to conditions intended to","limit the possibility for the air carrier","wishing to obtain the slots to enter into","competition with the air carrier which","transfers or exchanges the slots."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"265","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Dominique Riquet","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-266","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 13 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 subparagraph 3"]],"meps":[96885],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:54"},"new":["The transfers or exchanges may not be","subject to conditions intended to limit the","possibility for the air carrier wishing to","obtain the slots to enter into competition","with the air carrier which transfers or","exchanges the slots."],"old":["For the transfers or exchanges referred to","in paragraph 1(b) and (c), the air carriers","shall give the coordinator the details of","any monetary or any other kind of","compensation. The details regarding","compensation for the transfers or","exchanges are confidential and the","coordinator shall only divulge such details","to the Member State where the airport is","situated or the Commission, upon their","request. The transfers or exchanges may","not be subject to conditions intended to","limit the possibility for the air carrier","wishing to obtain the slots from entering","","into competition with the air carrier which","transfers or exchanges the slots."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"266","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-267","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 13 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 subparagraph 3"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:54"},"new":["For the transfers or exchanges referred to","in paragraph 1(b) and (c), the air carriers","shall give the coordinator the details of any","monetary or any other kind of","compensation. The data regarding","compensation for the transfer or","exchange must be set out in detail in an","annual report to be submitted by the","coordinator or schedules facilitator. The","transfers or exchanges may not be subject","to conditions intended to limit the","possibility for the air carrier wishing to","obtain the slots from entering into","competition with the air carrier which","transfers or exchanges the slots."],"old":["For the transfers or exchanges referred to","in paragraph 1(b) and (c), the air carriers","shall give the coordinator the details of any","monetary or any other kind of","compensation. The details regarding","compensation for the transfers or","exchanges are confidential and the","coordinator shall only divulge such details","to the Member State where the airport is","situated or the Commission, upon their","request. The transfers or exchanges may","not be subject to conditions intended to","limit the possibility for the air carrier","wishing to obtain the slots from entering","into competition with the air carrier which","transfers or exchanges the slots."],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"267","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Spyros Danellis","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-268","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 13 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 subparagraph 3 a (new)"]],"meps":[99325],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:54"},"new":["In order to ensure that slot exchanges or","transfers do not have anti-competitive","effects or covenants, Coordinators shall","where necessary provide relevant data and","information to competition authorities."],"old":["",""],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"268","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-269","justification":" This addition would prevent incumbent airlines from transferring slots for financial gain\n immediately upon allocation from the slot pool.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 13 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 3 a (new)"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:55"},"new":["Slots that have been newly allocated to","incumbent airlines may not be transferred","or exchanged for compensation or","monetary gain for at least one equivalent","scheduling season."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"269","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Debora Serracchiani","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-270","justification":"Under Directive 2009/12/EC, the fund may be managed by the independent authority. This\nwould enable further administrative costs to be avoided and also allow greater flexibility to\nsatisfy the specific requirements of individual airports.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 13 a (new)"]],"meps":[96865],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:55"},"new":["Article 13a","Member States may adopt measures","aimed at earmarking some of the proceeds","from the sale of time slots to a fund","designed to support the enlargement of","airport infrastructure."],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"270","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-271","justification":"According to the DIRECTIVE 2009/12/EC the fund could be managed by the Independent\nAuthority. This would avoid additional administrative burdens and at the same time provide\nflexibility for the specific needs of the individual airports. Separation accounting principle\nmust be applied in order to allow the identification of the monetary resources dedicated to\neach airport within the fund. Part of revenues from secondary trading may be also allocated\nto finance infrastructure to improve access to the airport or to enhance intermodal links (i.e.\nhigh speed train / air transport).","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 13 a (new)"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:55"},"new":["Article 13a","Member States may set measures to","allocate a portion of proceeds from slots","trading to a fund for supporting the","airports infrastructure expansion,","including infrastructure to access the","airport."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"271","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Christine De Veyrac, Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-272","justification":" The establishing of secondary trading creates too many uncertainties for EU airline\n companies and airports. The risk of seeing regional routes disappear at the expense of more\n profitable routes, as well as the creation of a market in which not all the players are subject\n to the same financing rules, are further arguments against secondary trading. It would be\n inappropriate to help introduce differentiated rules in Europe by authorising the secondary\n market in certain Member States.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 14 \u2013 paragraph 1"]],"meps":[4347,97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:55"},"new":["This Regulation shall not affect the powers","of public authorities to approve the","transfer of slots between air carriers and to","direct how these are allocated pursuant to","national competition law or to Articles 101,","102 or 106 of the Treaty or Council","Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. These","transfers can only take place without","monetary compensation."],"old":["This Regulation shall not affect the powers","","","of public authorities to approve the","transfer of slots between air carriers and to","direct how these are allocated pursuant to","national competition law or to Articles 101,","102 or 106 of the Treaty or Council","Regulation (EC) No 139/2004."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"272","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Giommaria Uggias","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-273","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 15 \u2013 paragraph 2"]],"meps":[97131],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:55"},"new":["2. The delegation of power referred to in","Article 3(3) shall be conferred on the","Commission for a period of five years from","the date of entry into force of this","Regulation. The Commission shall draw","up a report in respect of the delegation of","power no later than nine months before","the end of the five-year period. The","delegation of power shall be tacitly","extended for periods of an identical","duration, unless the European Parliament","or the Council opposes such extension not","later than three months before the end of","each period."],"old":["2. The power to adopt delegated acts","referred to in Article 3(3) in fine shall be","conferred on the Commission for an","indeterminate period of time from the","entry into force of this Regulation."],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"273","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-274","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 17 \u2013 title"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:55"},"new":["Rejection of a flight plan in a \"no slot\"","situation"],"old":["Consistency between the slots and the","flight plans"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"274","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Christine De Veyrac","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-275","justification":"It would seem worthwhile to guard against any automatic or accidental rejection of a flight\nplan. A local filter for assessing more closely a flight without a slot would ensure, inter alia,\nthat sensitive flights, such as humanitarian flights or official flights, are not rejected. There is\na need to avoid discrimination against a class of carriers which are not ideal coordination\n\n matter, but are nonetheless an essential part of the flight scene.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 17 \u2013 paragraph 1"]],"meps":[4347],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:55"},"new":["1. When an air carrier submits a flight plan,","it shall include a reference to the slot","allocated. At the request of the Member","State, which may delegate this duty to a","coordinator, the network manager shall","reject an air carrier's flight plan if the air","carrier intends to land or take off at a","coordinated airport, during the periods for","which it is coordinated, without having a","slot allocated by the coordinator."],"old":["1. When an air carrier submits a flight plan,","it shall include a reference to the slot","allocated. The network manager shall","reject an air carrier's flight plan if the air","carrier intends to land or take off at a","coordinated airport, during the periods for","which it is coordinated, without having a","slot allocated by the coordinator. Business","aviation operators shall not be deemed to","have been allocated a slot if they would","have to operate outside the time-band","offered by the slot and if the delay is not","attributable to air navigation services."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"275","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-276","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 17 \u2013 paragraph 1"]],"meps":[96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:55"},"new":["1. When an air carrier submits a flight plan,","it shall include a reference to the slot","allocated. The network manager shall","reject an air carrier's flight plan if the air","carrier intends to land or take off at a","coordinated airport, during the periods for","which it is coordinated, without having a","slot allocated by the coordinator."],"old":["1. When an air carrier submits a flight plan,","it shall include a reference to the slot","allocated. The network manager shall","reject an air carrier's flight plan if the air","carrier intends to land or take off at a","coordinated airport, during the periods for","which it is coordinated, without having a","slot allocated by the coordinator. Business","aviation operators shall not be deemed to","have been allocated a slot if they would","have to operate outside the time-band","offered by the slot and if the delay is not","attributable to air navigation services."],"orig_lang":"it","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"276","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-277","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 17 \u2013 paragraph 1"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:55"},"new":["1. When an air carrier submits a flight plan,","it shall include a reference to the slot","allocated. The network manager, after","having heard the air carrier concerned,","may reject an air carrier's flight plan if the","air carrier intends to land or take off at a","coordinated airport, during the periods for","which it is coordinated, without having a","slot allocated by the coordinator. Business","aviation operators shall not be deemed to","have been allocated a slot if they would","have to operate outside the time-band","offered by the slot and if the delay is not","attributable to air navigation services."],"old":["1. When an air carrier submits a flight plan,","it shall include a reference to the slot","allocated. The network manager shall","reject an air carrier's flight plan if the air","carrier intends to land or take off at a","coordinated airport, during the periods for","which it is coordinated, without having a","slot allocated by the coordinator. Business","aviation operators shall not be deemed to","have been allocated a slot if they would","","","have to operate outside the time-band","offered by the slot and if the delay is not","attributable to air navigation services."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"277","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Christine De Veyrac","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-278","justification":"All carriers, including carriers with slot exemption, must notify the coordinator of their flight\nplans in order to ensure a dovetailing of flight plans and flight slots.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 17 \u2013 paragraph 2 a (new)"]],"meps":[4347],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:55"},"new":["2a. Fur the purposes of implementation of","paragraph 1 of this article, any aircraft","operator planning to operate an exempted","flight as defined in Article 2(11) shall","communicate to the coordinator their","flight plan identification details."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"278","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-279","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 18 \u2013 paragraph 1"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:55"},"new":["1. The coordinator shall withdraw the","series of slots provisionally allocated to an","air carrier in the process of establishing","itself and place them in the pool on the","agreed industry Historics Baseline Date if","the undertaking does not hold an operating","licence or equivalent on that date or if it is","not stated by the competent licensing","authority that it is likely that an operating","licence or equivalent will be issued before","the relevant scheduling period commences.","The competent licensing authorities shall","give regular information updates to the","coordinator and respond to its requests","within a reasonable period of time."],"old":["1. The coordinator shall withdraw the","series of slots provisionally allocated to an","air carrier in the process of establishing","itself and place them in the pool on 31","January for the following summer season","or on 31 August for the following winter","","","season if the undertaking does not hold an","operating licence or equivalent on that date","or if it is not stated by the competent","licensing authority that it is likely that an","operating licence or equivalent will be","issued before the relevant scheduling","period commences. The competent","licensing authorities shall give regular","information updates to the coordinator and","respond to its requests within a reasonable","period of time."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"279","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Christine De Veyrac","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-280","justification":" The concept of \u2018priority\u2019 introduced by the Commission could lead to differing interpretations\n and hence uncertainty. The concept of \u2018entitlement\u2019 used in Regulation (EEC) No 95/93\n\nshould therefore be maintained.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 18 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[4347],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:55"},"new":["Air carriers that repeatedly or intentionally","operate air services at a time significantly","different from the slot allocated as part of a","series of slots or use slots in a significantly","different way from that indicated at the","time of allocation shall lose","their entitlement as referred to in Article","10(2). The coordinator may decide to","withdraw from that air carrier the series of","slots in question for the remainder of the","scheduling period and place them in the","pool after having consulted the air carrier","concerned and after issuing a single","warning. If the air carrier requests","equivalent slots, the coordinator is not","obliged to allocate them."],"old":["Air carriers that repeatedly or intentionally","operate air services at a time significantly","different from the slot allocated as part of a","series of slots or use slots in a significantly","different way from that indicated at the","time of allocation shall lose their priority","as referred to in Article 10(2). The","coordinator may decide to withdraw from","that air carrier the series of slots in","question for the remainder of the","scheduling period and place them in the","pool after having consulted the air carrier","concerned and after issuing a single","warning. If the air carrier requests","equivalent slots, the coordinator is not","obliged to allocate them."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"280","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-281","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 18 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:55"},"new":["Air carriers that intentionally operate air","services at a time significantly different","from the slot allocated as part of a series of","slots or use slots in a significantly different","way from that indicated at the time of","allocation shall lose their priority as","referred to in Article 10(2). The","coordinator may decide to withdraw from","that air carrier the series of slots in","question for the remainder of the","scheduling period and place them in the","pool after having consulted the air carrier","concerned and after issuing a single","warning. If the air carrier requests","equivalent slots, the coordinator is not","obliged to allocate them."],"old":["Air carriers that repeatedly or intentionally","operate air services at a time significantly","different from the slot allocated as part of a","series of slots or use slots in a significantly","different way from that indicated at the","time of allocation shall lose their priority as","referred to in Article 10(2). The","coordinator may decide to withdraw from","that air carrier the series of slots in","question for the remainder of the","scheduling period and place them in the","pool after having consulted the air carrier","concerned and after issuing a single","warning. If the air carrier requests","equivalent slots, the coordinator is not","obliged to allocate them."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"281","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-282","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 18 \u2013 paragraph 2 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:55"},"new":["Air carriers that repeatedly and","intentionally, or General Aviation /","Business aviation that intentionally,","operate air services at a time significantly","different from the slot allocated as part of a","series of slots or use slots in a significantly","different way from that indicated at the","time of allocation and thereby cause","prejudice to airport or air traffic","operations shall lose their historical","precedence as referred to in Article 10(2).","The coordinator may decide to withdraw","from that air carrier the series of slots in","question for the remainder of the","scheduling period and place them in the","pool after having consulted the air carrier","concerned and after issuing a single","warning. If the air carrier then requests","equivalent slots, the coordinator is not","obliged to allocate them."],"old":["Air carriers that repeatedly or intentionally","operate air services at a time significantly","different from the slot allocated as part of a","series of slots or use slots in a significantly","different way from that indicated at the","time of allocation shall lose their priority","as referred to in Article 10(2). The","","coordinator may decide to withdraw from","that air carrier the series of slots in","question for the remainder of the","scheduling period and place them in the","pool after having consulted the air carrier","concerned and after issuing a single","warning. If the air carrier requests","equivalent slots, the coordinator is not","obliged to allocate them."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"282","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-283","justification":" Special reference should be made to financial penalties, which are an especially effective\n deterrent, and which should be tightened up across Europe.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 18 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 introductory part"]],"meps":[97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:55"},"new":["Member States shall ensure that effective,","proportionate and dissuasive financial or","other penalties are available, and are","applied, to deal with:"],"old":["Member States shall ensure that effective,","proportionate and dissuasive sanctions are","available and are applied to deal with:"],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"283","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian, Christine De Veyrac, Luis de Grandes Pascual","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-284","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 18 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 introductory part"]],"meps":[96810,96733,4347,28393],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:55"},"new":["Member States shall implement effective,","proportionate and dissuasive financial","penalties and/ or appropriate sanctions","that are effectively applied to deal with"],"old":["Member States shall ensure that effective,","proportionate and dissuasive sanctions are","available and are applied to deal with"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"284","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-285","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 18 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 introductory part"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:56"},"new":["Member States shall implement effective,","proportionate and dissuasive financial","penalties and/ or appropriate sanctions","that are effectively applied to deal with"],"old":["Member States shall ensure that effective,","proportionate and dissuasive sanctions are","available and are applied to deal with"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"285","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-286","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 18 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 indent 1"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:56"},"new":["\u2013 air carriers that intentionally, or","General Aviation / Business aviation that","intentionally, operates air services without","a corresponding slot or at times","significantly different from the allocated","slots or with the use of slots in a","significantly different way from that","indicated at the time of allocation;"],"old":["\u2013 repeated or intentional operation of air","services without a corresponding slot or at","times significantly different from the","allocated slots or with the use of slots in a","significantly different way from that","indicated at the time of allocation;"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"286","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-287","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 18 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 indent 1"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:56"},"new":["\u2013 Air carriers that repeatedly and","intentionally, or General Aviation /","Business aviation that intentionally,","operates air services without a","corresponding slot or at times significantly","different from the allocated slots or with","the use of slots in a significantly different","way from that indicated at the time of","allocation;"],"old":["\u2013 repeated or intentional operation of air","services without a corresponding slot or at","times significantly different from the","allocated slots or with the use of slots in a","significantly different way from that","indicated at the time of allocation;"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"287","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Christine De Veyrac","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-288","justification":" Its seems disproportionate to impose additional penalties for the late return of unused slots.\n In view of the deletion of Article 11 on the ex-ante penalty mechanism, the part of this article\n referring to that mechanism has also been deleted.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 18 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 indent 2"]],"meps":[4347],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:56"},"new":["\u2013 the return of slots after 31 January for the","following summer season or after","31 August for the following winter season,","or the retention of unused slots;"],"old":["- the return of slots after 31 January for the","following summer season or after","31 August for the following winter season,","or the retention of unused slots; the penalty","should in any case take account of the","possible use of the mechanism provided","by Article 11;"],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"288","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Dominique Riquet","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-289","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 18 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 indent 2"]],"meps":[96885],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:56"},"new":["\u2013 the return of slots after 31 January for the","following summer season or after","31 August for the following winter season,","or the retention of unused slots;"],"old":["- the return of slots after 31 January for the","following summer season or after","31 August for the following winter season,","or the retention of unused slots; the penalty","should in any case take account of the","possible use of the mechanism provided","by Article 11;"],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"289","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-290","justification":"An ex-ante penalty system would create barriers to entering the market, which could\nundermine the competitiveness of European airline companies as a whole. This ex-ante\nsystem is a new cash outgoing that would penalise indiscriminately all air carriers \u2013\nincluding those that comply with the rules. The focus should be on an ex-post system targeting\nairline companies that do not play fair.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 18 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 indent 2"]],"meps":[97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:56"},"new":["\u2013 the return of slots after 31 January for the","following summer season or after","31 August for the following winter season,","or the retention of unused slots;"],"old":["- the return of slots after 31 January for the","following summer season or after","31 August for the following winter season,","or the retention of unused slots; the penalty","should in any case take account of the","possible use of the mechanism provided","by Article 11;"],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"290","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-291","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 18 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 indent 2"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:56"},"new":["\u2013 the return of slots series after 31 January","for the following summer season or after","31 August for the following winter season,","or the retention of unused slots; the penalty","should in any case take account of the","possible use of the mechanism provided by","Article 11;"],"old":["\u2013 the return of slots after 31 January for the","following summer season or after 31","August for the following winter season, or","the retention of unused slots; the penalty","should in any case take account of the","possible use of the mechanism provided by","Article 11;"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"291","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-292","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 18 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 1 \u2013 indent 2"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:56"},"new":["\u2013 the return of slots and/or slot series after","the industry agreed Historics Baseline","Date, or the retention of unused slots","and/or slot series for commercial reasons;"],"old":["\u2013 the return of slots after 31 January for","the following summer season or after 31","August for the following winter season, or","the retention of unused slots; the penalty","should in any case take account of the","possible use of the mechanism provided","by Article 11;"],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"292","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Michel Dantin","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-293","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 18 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 1 a (new)"]],"meps":[97296],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:56"},"new":["Member States shall notify the European","Commission of the penalty system they","have implemented under this paragraph."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"293","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-294","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 18 \u2013 paragraph 3 \u2013 subparagraph 2"]],"meps":[96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:56"},"new":["Members States shall have these penalties","in place not later than one year after","adoption of this Regulation. They shall","duly inform the Commission who will","assess their effectiveness. When a","potential case of a breach of Art 18 (2) (3)","is identified, through slot monitoring or","otherwise, then the air carrier will be","contacted in writing with details of the","alleged breach and a request for","information about the air service or slot in","question. Where a financial penalty is","necessary it will apply to each individual","failure, by an air carrier who fails to","comply with Article 18 (2) (3), and will","have a pre-determined minimum value, to","be set by the Member State. Multiple","infringements could trigger several","financial penalties and could result in, for","example, the doubling of the financial","penalty for each further misuse. The","coordinator shall be duly informed of the","application of penalties. Decisions to","impose financial penalties will be","published by the coordinator."],"old":["The coordinator shall be duly informed of","the application of penalties."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"294","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Petra Kammerevert","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-295","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 18 \u2013 paragraph 4 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[96837],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:56"},"new":["Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if the","80 % usage rate as defined in Article 10(2)","cannot be achieved by an air carrier, the","coordinator may decide to withdraw from","that air carrier the series of slots in","question for the remainder of the","scheduling period and place them in the","pool after having consulted the air carrier","concerned."],"old":["Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if the","85 % usage rate as defined in Article 10(2)","cannot be achieved by an air carrier, the","coordinator may decide to withdraw from","that air carrier the series of slots in","question for the remainder of the","scheduling period and place them in the","pool after having consulted the air carrier","concerned."],"orig_lang":"de","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"295","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Vilja Savisaar-Toomast","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-296","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 18 \u2013 paragraph 4 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[97308],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:56"},"new":["Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if the","80 % usage rate as defined in Article 10(2)","cannot be achieved by an air carrier, the","coordinator may decide to withdraw from","that air carrier the series of slots in","question for the remainder of the","scheduling period and place them in the","pool after having consulted the air carrier","concerned."],"old":["Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if the","85 % usage rate as defined in Article 10(2)","cannot be achieved by an air carrier, the","coordinator may decide to withdraw from","that air carrier the series of slots in","question for the remainder of the","scheduling period and place them in the","pool after having consulted the air carrier","concerned."],"orig_lang":"et","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"296","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Dominique Riquet","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-297","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 18 \u2013 paragraph 4 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[96885],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:56"},"new":["Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if the","80 % usage rate as defined in Article 10(2)","cannot be achieved by an air carrier, the","coordinator may decide to withdraw from","that air carrier the series of slots in","question for the remainder of the","scheduling period and place them in the","pool after having consulted the air carrier","concerned."],"old":["Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if the","85 % usage rate as defined in Article 10(2)","cannot be achieved by an air carrier, the","coordinator may decide to withdraw from","that air carrier the series of slots in","question for the remainder of the","scheduling period and place them in the","pool after having consulted the air carrier","concerned."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"297","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Marian-Jean Marinescu","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-298","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 18 \u2013 paragraph 4 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[33982],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:57"},"new":["Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if the","80 % usage rate as defined in Article 10(2)","cannot be achieved by an air carrier, the","coordinator may decide to withdraw from","that air carrier the series of slots in","question for the remainder of the","scheduling period and place them in the","pool after having consulted the air carrier","concerned."],"old":["Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if the","85 % usage rate as defined in Article 10(2)","cannot be achieved by an air carrier, the","coordinator may decide to withdraw from","that air carrier the series of slots in","question for the remainder of the","scheduling period and place them in the","pool after having consulted the air carrier","concerned."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"298","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Michael Gahler, Corien Wortmann-Kool","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-299","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 18 \u2013 paragraph 4 \u2013 subparagraph 1"]],"meps":[96810,96733,28393,2341,28167],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:57"},"new":["Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if the","80 % usage rate as defined in Article 10(2)","cannot be achieved by an air carrier, the","coordinator may decide to withdraw from","that air carrier the series of slots in","question for the remainder of the","scheduling period and place them in the","pool after having consulted the air carrier","concerned."],"old":["Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if the","85 % usage rate as defined in Article 10(2)","cannot be achieved by an air carrier, the","coordinator may decide to withdraw from","that air carrier the series of slots in","question for the remainder of the","scheduling period and place them in the","pool after having consulted the air carrier","concerned."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"299","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Petra Kammerevert","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-300","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 18 \u2013 paragraph 4 \u2013 subparagraph 2"]],"meps":[96837],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:57"},"new":["Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if after","an allotted time corresponding to 20 % of","the period of the series validity no slots of","that series of slots have been used, the","coordinator shall place the series of slots in","question in the pool for the remainder of","the scheduling period, after having","consulted the air carrier concerned. The","coordinator may decide to withdraw the","series of slots before the end of a period","corresponding to 20 % of the period of","validity of the series if the carrier does not","show that it intends to use them."],"old":["Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if after","an allotted time corresponding to 15 % of","the period of the series validity no slots of","that series of slots have been used, the","coordinator shall place the series of slots in","question in the pool for the remainder of","the scheduling period, after having","consulted the air carrier concerned. The","coordinator may decide to withdraw the","series of slots before the end of a period","corresponding to 15 % of the period of","validity of the series if the carrier does not","show that it intends to use them."],"orig_lang":"de","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"300","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Vilja Savisaar-Toomast","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-301","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 18 \u2013 paragraph 4 \u2013 subparagraph 2"]],"meps":[97308],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:57"},"new":["Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if after","an allotted time corresponding to 20 % of","the period of the series validity no slots of","that series of slots have been used, the","coordinator shall place the series of slots in","question in the pool for the remainder of","the scheduling period, after having","consulted the air carrier concerned. The","coordinator may decide to withdraw the","series of slots before the end of a period","corresponding to 20 % of the period of","validity of the series if the carrier does not","show that it intends to use them."],"old":["Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if after","an allotted time corresponding to 15 % of","the period of the series validity no slots of","that series of slots have been used, the","coordinator shall place the series of slots in","question in the pool for the remainder of","the scheduling period, after having","consulted the air carrier concerned. The","coordinator may decide to withdraw the","series of slots before the end of a period","corresponding to 15 % of the period of","validity of the series if the carrier does not","show that it intends to use them."],"orig_lang":"et","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"301","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Michael Gahler, Corien Wortmann-Kool","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-302","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 18 \u2013 paragraph 4 \u2013 subparagraph 2"]],"meps":[96810,96733,28393,2341,28167],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:57"},"new":["Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if after","an allotted time corresponding to 20 % of","the period of the series validity no slots of","that series of slots have been used, the","coordinator shall place the series of slots in","question in the pool for the remainder of","the scheduling period, after having","consulted the air carrier concerned. The","coordinator may decide to withdraw the","series of slots before the end of a period","corresponding to 20 % of the period of","validity of the series if the carrier does not","show that it intends to use them."],"old":["Without prejudice to Article 10(5), if after","an allotted time corresponding to 15 % of","the period of the series validity no slots of","that series of slots have been used, the","coordinator shall place the series of slots in","question in the pool for the remainder of","the scheduling period, after having","consulted the air carrier concerned. The","coordinator may decide to withdraw the","series of slots before the end of a period","corresponding to 15 % of the period of","validity of the series if the carrier does not","show that it intends to use them."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"302","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carlo Fidanza, Antonio Cancian","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-303","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 19 \u2013 paragraph 1"]],"meps":[96810,96733],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:57"},"new":["1. Without prejudice to rights of appeal","under national law, complaints regarding","the application of Articles 7(2), 9, 10, 13,","17 and 18(1),(2), (3) and (4) shall be","submitted to the coordination committee.","The committee shall, within a period of","one month following submission of the","complaint, consider the matter and if","possible make proposals to the coordinator","in an attempt to resolve the problem. If the","complaint cannot be settled, the Member","State responsible may, within a further two","month period, provide for mediation by an","air carriers' or airports' representative","organisation or other third party."],"old":["1. Without prejudice to rights of appeal","under national law, complaints regarding","the application of Articles 7(2), 9, 10, 13,","17 and 18(1),(2) and (4) shall be submitted","to the coordination committee. The","committee shall, within a period of one","month following submission of the","complaint, consider the matter and if","possible make proposals to the coordinator","in an attempt to resolve the problem. If the","complaint cannot be settled, the Member","State responsible may, within a further two","month period, provide for mediation by an","air carriers\u2018 or airports\u2019 representative","organisation or other third party."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"303","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Spyros Danellis","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-304","justification":"The air transport industry can adjust speedily to regulatory changes and therefore a three\nyear period would be sufficient to see the first round of effects of the Regulation.","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 21 \u2013 paragraph 1"]],"meps":[99325],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:57"},"new":["1. The Commission shall submit a report to","the European Parliament and the Council","on the operation of this Regulation at the","latest three years after its entry into force.","The report shall address in particular the","functioning of Articles 9, 10 11 and 13."],"old":["1. The Commission shall submit a report to","the European Parliament and the Council","on the operation of this Regulation at the","latest four years after its entry into force.","The report shall address in particular the","functioning of Articles 9, 10 11 and 13."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"304","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Spyros Danellis, David-Maria Sassoli","changes":{},"committee":["TRAN"],"date":"2012-09-17T00:00:00","id":"PE496.307-305","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 21 \u2013 paragraph 1 a (new)"]],"meps":[99325,96864],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:39:57"},"new":["1a. The Commission will monitor the","secondary markets for slots based on the","data received from co-ordinators and will","report on relevant trends, including those","relating to regional and intra-EU","connectivity, in its Annual Analysis of Air","Transport Markets."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE496.307v01-00","reference":"2011/0391(COD)","seq":"305","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-496.307+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"}],"changes":{"2014-11-09T23:27:44":[{"data":[{"body":"EC","commission":[{"Commissioner":"KALLAS Siim","DG":{"title":"Mobility and Transport","url":"http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/transport/index_en.htm"}}],"date":"2011-12-01T00:00:00","docs":[{"celexid":"CELEX:52011PC0827:EN","text":["
PURPOSE: to recast Regulation (EEC) n° 95/93 on\nthe allocation of airport slots in order to i) ensure optimal\nallocation and use of airport slots in congested airports; ii)\nensure strengthened and effectively implemented slot allocation and\nuse and iii) enhance fair competition and competitiveness of\noperators.
\nPROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament\nand of the Council.
\nBACKGROUND: the implementation of the Slot Regulation\nhas significantly improved slot allocation at busy European\nairports in terms of neutrality and transparency, making a major\ncontribution to the creation of the internal market in\naviation.
\nNowadays, however, there is much more competition.\nSince 1992, the number of intra-EU routes operated has more than\ndoubled and there has been a 150 % increase in long-haul flights\ndeparting from European airports. In 1992, just 93 European routes\nwere served by more than two airlines. In 2010 there were 479 such\nroutes.
\nThe slot-allocation system established in 1993 does\nnot ensure the optimum allocation and use of slots and thus of\nairport capacity.
\nAs highlighted by Eurocontrol and ACI-Europe, one of\nthe key challenges facing Europe is airport congestion. According\nto Eurocontrol's Long Term Forecast in December 2010, even taking\ninto account currently planned infrastructure enhancements, as much\nas 10% of demand for air transport will remain unmet in 2030 due to\na shortage of airport capacity.
\nTherefore, it is necessary to review the Slot\nRegulation to determine to what extent it can be improved with a\nview to matching capacity to demand for air transport in all\nsectors (long-haul, regional, cargo, etc.).
\nThis initiative is one of the actions necessary for\nthe Single European Transport Area as described in the Commission's\nWhite Paper: Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area\n Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport\nsystem. It is also part of the airport package of\nmeasures identified as a strategic initiative in the 2011\nCommission Work Programme.
\nIMPACT ASSESSMENT: three packages is as\nfollows:
\n\n· \nthe first policy package included measures to improve the effectiveness of slot\nallocation and the use of slots, without changing the\nadministrative nature of the current system;
\n\n· \nthe second package incorporated the elements of the first package but\nadded several more, including market-based mechanisms (in the form\nof explicit provision for secondary trading across the EU). It also\nincluded several pro-competitive proposals, such as revision of the\nnew entrant rule and making the criteria for granting priority for\nallocation of a slot for the following season (so-called\ngrandfather rights) slightly stricter;
\n\n· \nthe third package comprised all elements of the second package, but took\nthe market-based mechanism a step further by withdrawing\n'grandfather' or 'historical' slots and having them\nauctioned.
\nThe Commission recommended that the second package be\nimplemented as its benefits would be considerably higher than the\ncosts incurred. For the 2012-25 period, the package was estimated\nto result in an average annual increase of 1.6 % (or 23.8 million)\nin the number of passengers carried, a net economic benefit of EUR\n5.3 billion, as well as a significant increase in employment (up to\n62 000 full-time jobs).
\nLEGAL BASIS: Article 100 (2) TFEU.
\nCONTENT: the main points of the proposal are as\nfollows :
\n1) Introduction of the possibility for secondary\ntrade in slots and increased competition
\n\n· \nin order to encourage greater slot mobility, the\nproposal expressly allows airlines to buy and sell\nslots ;
\n\n· \nit is also proposed to broaden the definition of\n'new entrant', to help facilitate the growth of sustainable\ncompetitors and reduce the schedule fragmentation that occurs when\nslots are allocated to a larger number of airlines unable to\ntranslate these slots into a viable alternative to dominant\ncarriers.
\n2) Strengthening the transparency of the slot\nallocation process and the independence of slot coordinators:\nthe proposal:
\n\n· \ncontains a number of provisions to ensure that\nthe slot allocation process is supported by a sufficient\ndegree of transparency;
\n\n· \nwill allow stricter criteria for the\nindependence of the coordinators with regard to any interested\nparty to be defined;
\n\n· \nadvocates enhanced cooperation between the\ncoordinators, initially through the development of common projects\ncovering, for instance, the development of common slot allocation\nsoftware or even merging the coordination activities for airports\nsituated in different Member States.
\nOn the basis of progress made, the Commission could\neventually propose, at a later stage, the creation of a European\ncoordinator responsible for slot allocation at all European Union\nairports.
\n3) Integration of slot allocation with the reform\nof the European air traffic management system (Single European\nSky): the proposal aims to make an important contribution to\nstrengthening the management of the aviation network at European\nlevel by associating the European Network Manager with the slot\nallocation process:
\n\n· \nthe Commission may request a capacity analysis\nat an airport, should the network manager deem this necessary for\nensuring coherence with the airport operational plan. Such capacity\nanalyses would be carried out in accordance with standards agreed\nat European level;
\n\n· \nthe Commission could make recommendations \nto the Member State on the capacity assessment if the network\nmanager suggests that it does not fully take into account the needs\nof the European network;
\n\n· \nthe proposal also introduces a new category of\nairport: the 'network airport'. Such airports are not coordinated,\nbut are identified as important since they may offer alternatives\nduring times of network disruption. Thus, the proposal provides\nthat coordinators gather information on the operations at these\nairports.
\n4) Amendment of the '80-20' rule and definition of\na series of slots and resort to the airport charge system to\ndiscourage the late return of slots to the pool:
\n\n· \nin order for airlines to be granted priority for\nthe allocation of a given slot in the next corresponding scheduling\nseason, they need to have used at least 85 % of the allocated\nseries of slots (instead of 80 % at present);
\n\n· \nthe minimum series length (i.e. the minimum\nnumber of weekly slots required for priority allocation for the\nfollowing corresponding season) is raised from 5 to 15 for the\nsummer season and 10 for the winter season. Exceptions are provided\nfor certain types of traffic (charter) to take the characteristics\nof regional airports into account;
\n\n· \nlastly, to ensure that slots reserved prior to\nthe start of an operating season are in fact operated as planned by\nairlines, the proposal would authorise airports to use an airport\ncharge system to dissuade air carriers from belatedly returning\nslots to the pool.
\nBUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no\nimplications for the EU budget.
\nDELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions\nempowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance\nwith Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European\nUnion.
\nThe Council agreed a general approach on a\nrecast of the 1993 regulation on the allocation of landing and\ntake-off slots at EU airports that face capacity\nproblems.
\nThe revision is intended to tackle growing airport\ncongestion by introducing a series of measures:
\nThe main outstanding issue that needed to be settled\nby ministers concerned the possibility for airlines to sell and\nbuy slots. Some delegations requested the introduction of\nsafeguards because of concerns about the possible negative impact\nof secondary trading on - economically less profitable - regional\nflights or about the potential speculative use of traded slots.\nOther delegations, however, as well as the Commission, stressed the\nneed for a uniform application of the system, pointing to the risk\nof market fragmentation.
\nAs a compromise acceptable to the majority of\ndelegations, the text of the draft regulation tabled by the\nPresidency has been amended to allow Member States to apply\ntemporary restrictions where a significant and demonstrable problem\nwith secondary trading occurs. Such restrictions must be\ntransparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate, justified and\ncommunicated to the Commission, which has the right to oppose them.\nMember States will be obliged to comply with the Commission's\ndecision, which must also be justified.
\nIn addition, still within the framework of the\nsecondary trading scheme, conditions have been slightly relaxed as\nregards the use of re-timed slots received after an exchange of\nnewly acquired slots, which is allowed only in order to improve\nthe slot timings for the services concerned. It was agreed that\nsuch re-timed slots need not necessarily be operated during a full\nscheduling period.
\nThe compromise achieved also includes a number of\nchanges to other parts of the Draft Regulation:
\nAs regards the changes proposed by the Commission to\nthe current conditions for granting priority in slot allocation\nto carriers that already had the same slots in previous scheduling\nseasons (\"historical slots\"), the discussions in the Council's\npreparatory bodies had already shown that a large majority of\nMember States are against those changes. At the Council meeting,\nthe Commission reaffirmed its proposal to raise the minimum rate at\nwhich carriers must effectively have used the slots allocated from\nthe current 80% to 85% and the minimum number of slots to be\nrequested for the same time on the same day of the week (\"slot\nseries\") from the current 5 to 15 for the summer season and 10 for\nthe winter season. Most Member States, on the contrary, prefer to\nkeep the current system, pointing to the need for\nflexibility for airlines, notably in order to avoid empty flights\nbeing operated only in order to secure entitlement to the slots.\nHowever, it will be possible to increase the minimum number of\nslots required within the framework of local guidelines.
\nThe European Parliament, whose approval is also\nrequired for the adoption of the Regulation, has not yet determined\nits position on the proposal.
\nThe Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the\nreport by Giommaria UGGIAS (ALDE, IT) on the proposal for a\nRegulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common\nrules for the allocation of slots at EU airports (recast).\nIt recommends that the European Parliaments position in first\nreading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend\nthe Commission proposal as follows:
\n\nCoordinators role: in legal terms, the coordinator's\nessential functions, which consist of allocating slots in an equal\nand non-discriminatory manner, shall be given to a natural or legal\nperson who or which is not a service provider in the airport, an\nairline operating from the airport or the managing body of the\nairport in question. The committee adds that in order to prove\nthat he/she/it does not share common interests\nwith any such entities, the coordinator or schedules\nfacilitator must submit an annual declaration\nof his/her/its financial interests. Furthermore, the\ncomposition of the coordinator's board or supervisory function\nshall also be independent of the direct interests of the airport\nmanaging body, the airline users of that airport and any other\nentity representing a user or service provider. This shall not,\nhowever preclude representatives of such\norganisations from being members of a board or\nsupervisory function, provided that voting rights are\nbalanced.
\nMembers also add\nthat:
\nThe financing referred to shall be provided by all\nthe air carriers who operate in the coordinated and\nschedules facilitated airports, and by those airports in\nsuch a way as to ensure that the financial burden is distributed\nequitably among all interested parties and that the financing does\nnot largely depend on a sole interested party. Member\nStates shall launch a stakeholder consultation procedure,\nincorporating the possibility of an appeal, in order to ensure\ntransparent, non-discriminatory charging correlating to the service\nprovided by the coordinator or schedules facilitator. Collection of\nthe air carriers payments shall be the responsibility of the\nairports concerned, which shall pay those amounts to the\ncoordinator or schedules facilitator. Member States shall ensure\nthat adequate financial, human, technical and material\nresources and expertise are at the disposal of the\ncoordinator and the schedules facilitator, such as to enable\nthem to carryout their duties at all times.
\nThe coordinator and\nthe schedules facilitator shall furthermore submit to the\nCommission, to the Member States and to all\nparties involved in their financing a separate annual financial\nreport indicating in detail revenue and expenditure relating to\ntheir activities.
\nUsage rate:\nunder the Commission's proposal on airport slot allocation, a\nslot would be taken away from an airline if it is used\nless than 85% of the time. The current threshold is 80%. The\ncommittee states that raising the slot series usage rate to 85%\nseems excessive and is not an appropriate answer to congestion\nproblems. This rate would also lead to carriers flying\nempty in order not to lose their series allocation, which is\nhardly in keeping with the overriding need to address the\nenvironmental impact of this mode of transport. The rate would\ntherefore seem to be of little economic or environmental benefit.\nAn 80-20 ratio should therefore be maintained for series usage\nrates.
\nFinancial\nsanctions: rather than using general fees, Members specify that\nthe managing body of a coordinated airport must establish and\napply effective, proportionate and dissuasive financial\nsanctions to deal with the return of slots after the agreed\nHistoric Baseline Dates for the following winter or summer season,\nrespectively, or the retention of unused slots with the aim of\ndissuading air carriers from belatedly returning slots to the pool,\nand must hold them liable for having reserved airport\ninfrastructure without using it. The new text sets out a series of\nprinciples that must be respected in laying down sanctions.
\nRevenue from\nslots trading: Members specify that Member States may adopt\nmeasures to allocate a portion of the revenue generated from the\nslots trading to a fund in order to cover the costs of developing\nairport infrastructure and optimising related services. In the\ninterests of complete transparency, the fund in\nquestion shall be determined and approved by an\nindependent supervisory authority as referred to in\nDirective 2009/12/EC. The fund must at all times be\nmanaged in such a way as to ensure that the principles of separate\naccounting are followed, so that the financial amounts to be\nallocated from the fund to each airport can be established. The\nrevenues generated from the slot trading at one airport shall be\nreinvested at the same airport.
\nMonitoring of\nsecondary trading: lastly, the\nCommission shall monitor the secondary markets for slots\nbased on the data received from co-ordinators\nand shall report on relevant trends, including those\nrelating to regional and intra-Union connectivity, in its Annual\nAnalysis of Air Transport Markets.
\nThe European Parliament adopted by 565 votes to 69\nwith 26 abstentions a legislative resolution on the proposal for a\nregulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common\nrules for the allocation of slots at EU airports (recast).\nParliaments position in first reading following the ordinary\nlegislative procedure amends the Commission proposal as\nfollows:
\nDefinition of airport slots: Parliament notes that the relevant theory and case law\nhave not yet advanced sufficiently to produce an exhaustive legal\ndefinition of airport slots. As of now it is expedient to be able\nto work on the assumption that the use of slots in the public\ninterest - hence not in any strict sense a public good - may serve\nas a guideline for a legal definition. It is therefore appropriate\nto formulate a definition of slots that establishes that they may\nbecome subject to rights and that governs the allocation of slots.\nParliament adds that airport slots are non-material assets of\npublic utility whose use is subject to the conditions laid down in\nthis Regulation. They are therefore assigned by airport\ncoordinators so as to ensure maximum transparency, in\nthe interests of Member States, passengers, airport managers and\nair carriers.
\nSeries of slots is amended to mean at least five slots which\nhave been requested for the same time on the same day of the week\nregularly in the same scheduling period and allocated by the\ncoordinator on that basis or, if that is not possible, allocated at\napproximately the same time, unless agreed otherwise through a\nlocal rule under the conditions referred to in the text. The\nCommission proposal had stated that series of\nslots should mean at least 15 slots for a summer scheduling\nperiod and 10 slots for a winter scheduling period requested for\nthe same time on the same day of the week for consecutive\nweeks.
\nCoordinators role: Members strengthened provisions regarding the\nindependence of the coordinator. The draft regulation states that\nin legal terms, the coordinator's essential functions, which\nconsist of allocating slots in an equal and non-discriminatory\nmanner, shall be given to a natural or legal person who or which is\nnot a service provider in the airport, an airline operating from\nthe airport or the managing body of the airport in question.\nParliament adds that in order to prove that he/she/it does not\nshare common interests with any such entities, the coordinator or\nschedules facilitator must submit an annual declaration of\nhis/her/its financial interests. Furthermore, the composition of\nthe coordinator's board or supervisory function shall also be\nindependent of the direct interests of the airport managing body,\nthe airline users of that airport and any other entity representing\na user or service provider. This shall not, however preclude\nrepresentatives of such organisations from being members of a board\nor supervisory function, provided that voting rights are\nbalanced.
\nMembers also add that:
\nThe financing referred to shall be provided by all\nthe air carriers who operate in the coordinated and schedules\nfacilitated airports, and by those airports in such a way as to\nensure that the financial burden is distributed equitably\namong all interested parties and that the financing does not\nlargely depend on a sole interested party. Member States shall\nlaunch a stakeholder consultation procedure, incorporating the\npossibility of an appeal, in order to ensure transparent,\nnon-discriminatory charging correlating to the service provided by\nthe coordinator or schedules facilitator. Collection of the air\ncarriers payments shall be the responsibility of the airports\nconcerned, which shall pay those amounts to the coordinator or\nschedules facilitator. Member States shall ensure that adequate\nfinancial, human, technical and material resources and\nexpertise are at the disposal of the coordinator and the\nschedules facilitator, such as to enable them to carryout their\nduties at all times.
\nThe coordinator and the schedules facilitator shall\nfurthermore submit to the Commission, to the Member States and to\nall parties involved in their financing a separate annual\nfinancial report indicating in detail revenue and expenditure\nrelating to their activities.
\nThe electronic database for which the\ncoordinator is responsible shall be freely accessible for all\ninterested parties upon request, including the European\nParliament, and contain the information prescribed in the\ntext.
\nLocal rules: Members\nspecify that local rules shall concern the allocation and\nmonitoring of slots and may be applied only where it can be\nproved that an airport reaches an alarming level of congestion\nand that performance or throughput improvements can therefore be\ndelivered through locally applied rules. Such local rules shall be\ntransparent and non-discriminatory, and shall be agreed on in the\ncoordination committee. The Commission proposal had specified\ninstead that the local guidelines might only concern the monitoring\nof the use of slots allocated or the amendment of the definition of\na series of slots to reduce its length below 10 slots for the\nwinter scheduling period or below 15 slots for the summer\nscheduling period, but under no circumstances below 5\nslots.
\nUsage rate: under the\nCommission's proposal on airport slot allocation, a slot would be\ntaken away from an airline if it is used less than 85% of the time.\nThe current threshold is 80%. However, Parliament rejected the\nproposal to raise the slot series usage rate to 85% and maintains\nin the text an 80-20 ratio for series usage\nrates.
\nMembers add that slots shall be returned to the pool\nwhen they are not being used after the expiry of a maximum\nperiod of six months. When a route no longer meets the\nrequirement for Public Service Obligations slots reservation, the\nslots shall either be reserved for another route subject to public\nservice obligations or shall remain with the air carrier which was\nusing them if the requirement laid down in the Regulation has been\nmet for the series concerned.
\nFinancial sanctions: rather than using general fees, Members specify that\nthe managing body of a coordinated airport must establish and apply\neffective, proportionate and dissuasive financial sanctions\nto deal with the return of slots after the agreed Historic Baseline\nDates for the following winter or summer season, respectively, or\nthe retention of unused slots with the aim of dissuading air\ncarriers from belatedly returning slots to the pool, and must hold\nthem liable for having reserved airport infrastructure without\nusing it. The new text sets out a series of principles that must be\nrespected in laying down sanctions. Members stipulate that the\nsystem of sanctions shall be revenue-neutral for the airport\nmanaging body and shall be aimed solely at increasing the\nefficiency of time slot allocation.
\nThese sanctions must be in place not later than one\nyear after the adoption of the Regulation. Member States shall\nduly inform the Commission, which shall assess the effectiveness of\nthe sanctions in question.
\nWhere a financial sanction is necessary, it shall\napply to each individual failure by an air carrier to comply with\nthe relevant provisions, and shall have a pre-determined minimum\nvalue, to be set by the Member State concerned. Multiple\ninfringements may give rise to the imposition of a series of\nfinancial sanctions and may result in, for example, the doubling of\nthe financial penalty for each further infringement. The\ncoordinator shall be duly informed of the imposition of penalties.\nDecisions to impose financial sanctions shall be published by the\ncoordinator.
\nRevenue from slots trading: Parliament specifies that Member States may adopt\nmeasures to allocate a portion of the revenue generated from the\nslots trading to a fund in order to cover the costs of developing\nairport infrastructure and optimising related services. In the\ninterests of complete transparency, the fund in question shall be\ndetermined and approved by an independent supervisory authority as\nreferred to in Directive 2009/12/EC. The fund must at all times be\nmanaged in such a way as to ensure that the principles of separate\naccounting are followed, so that the financial amounts to be\nallocated from the fund to each airport can be established. The\nrevenues generated from the slot trading at one airport shall be\nreinvested at the same airport.
\nMonitoring of secondary trading: Parliament approves the Commissions view that\nthe allocation and use of slots could be made more effective by\nintroducing slot exchange mechanisms, by ensuring that the unused\nslots are made available to interested operators as soon as\npossible and in a transparent manner, and by reinforcing the\nunderlying principles of the system with regard to the allocation,\nmanagement and use of the slots. In addition, it is important that\naccess to hub airports from regional airports be maintained where\nsuch routes are essential to the economy of the region in question.\nTherefore, concerns regarding efficient allocation of slots\nmust continue to be balanced against the need to protect the\nexternal benefits of air transport services and in particular the\nvalue that they create for European regions.
\nLastly, Parliament adds that the\nCommission shall monitor the secondary markets for slots\nbased on the data received from co-ordinators\nand shall report on relevant trends, including those\nrelating to regional and intra-Union connectivity, in its Annual\nAnalysis of Air Transport Markets.
\nPURPOSE: to recast Regulation (EEC) n° 95/93 on\nthe allocation of airport slots in order to i) ensure optimal\nallocation and use of airport slots in congested airports; ii)\nensure strengthened and effectively implemented slot allocation and\nuse and iii) enhance fair competition and competitiveness of\noperators.
\nPROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament\nand of the Council.
\nBACKGROUND: the implementation of the Slot Regulation\nhas significantly improved slot allocation at busy European\nairports in terms of neutrality and transparency, making a major\ncontribution to the creation of the internal market in\naviation.
\nNowadays, however, there is much more competition.\nSince 1992, the number of intra-EU routes operated has more than\ndoubled and there has been a 150 % increase in long-haul flights\ndeparting from European airports. In 1992, just 93 European routes\nwere served by more than two airlines. In 2010 there were 479 such\nroutes.
\nThe slot-allocation system established in 1993 does\nnot ensure the optimum allocation and use of slots and thus of\nairport capacity.
\nAs highlighted by Eurocontrol and ACI-Europe, one of\nthe key challenges facing Europe is airport congestion. According\nto Eurocontrol's Long Term Forecast in December 2010, even taking\ninto account currently planned infrastructure enhancements, as much\nas 10% of demand for air transport will remain unmet in 2030 due to\na shortage of airport capacity.
\nTherefore, it is necessary to review the Slot\nRegulation to determine to what extent it can be improved with a\nview to matching capacity to demand for air transport in all\nsectors (long-haul, regional, cargo, etc.).
\nThis initiative is one of the actions necessary for\nthe Single European Transport Area as described in the Commission's\nWhite Paper: Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area\n Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport\nsystem. It is also part of the airport package of\nmeasures identified as a strategic initiative in the 2011\nCommission Work Programme.
\nIMPACT ASSESSMENT: three packages is as\nfollows:
\n\n· \nthe first policy package included measures to improve the effectiveness of slot\nallocation and the use of slots, without changing the\nadministrative nature of the current system;
\n\n· \nthe second package incorporated the elements of the first package but\nadded several more, including market-based mechanisms (in the form\nof explicit provision for secondary trading across the EU). It also\nincluded several pro-competitive proposals, such as revision of the\nnew entrant rule and making the criteria for granting priority for\nallocation of a slot for the following season (so-called\ngrandfather rights) slightly stricter;
\n\n· \nthe third package comprised all elements of the second package, but took\nthe market-based mechanism a step further by withdrawing\n'grandfather' or 'historical' slots and having them\nauctioned.
\nThe Commission recommended that the second package be\nimplemented as its benefits would be considerably higher than the\ncosts incurred. For the 2012-25 period, the package was estimated\nto result in an average annual increase of 1.6 % (or 23.8 million)\nin the number of passengers carried, a net economic benefit of EUR\n5.3 billion, as well as a significant increase in employment (up to\n62 000 full-time jobs).
\nLEGAL BASIS: Article 100 (2) TFEU.
\nCONTENT: the main points of the proposal are as\nfollows :
\n1) Introduction of the possibility for secondary\ntrade in slots and increased competition
\n\n· \nin order to encourage greater slot mobility, the\nproposal expressly allows airlines to buy and sell\nslots ;
\n\n· \nit is also proposed to broaden the definition of\n'new entrant', to help facilitate the growth of sustainable\ncompetitors and reduce the schedule fragmentation that occurs when\nslots are allocated to a larger number of airlines unable to\ntranslate these slots into a viable alternative to dominant\ncarriers.
\n2) Strengthening the transparency of the slot\nallocation process and the independence of slot coordinators:\nthe proposal:
\n\n· \ncontains a number of provisions to ensure that\nthe slot allocation process is supported by a sufficient\ndegree of transparency;
\n\n· \nwill allow stricter criteria for the\nindependence of the coordinators with regard to any interested\nparty to be defined;
\n\n· \nadvocates enhanced cooperation between the\ncoordinators, initially through the development of common projects\ncovering, for instance, the development of common slot allocation\nsoftware or even merging the coordination activities for airports\nsituated in different Member States.
\nOn the basis of progress made, the Commission could\neventually propose, at a later stage, the creation of a European\ncoordinator responsible for slot allocation at all European Union\nairports.
\n3) Integration of slot allocation with the reform\nof the European air traffic management system (Single European\nSky): the proposal aims to make an important contribution to\nstrengthening the management of the aviation network at European\nlevel by associating the European Network Manager with the slot\nallocation process:
\n\n· \nthe Commission may request a capacity analysis\nat an airport, should the network manager deem this necessary for\nensuring coherence with the airport operational plan. Such capacity\nanalyses would be carried out in accordance with standards agreed\nat European level;
\n\n· \nthe Commission could make recommendations \nto the Member State on the capacity assessment if the network\nmanager suggests that it does not fully take into account the needs\nof the European network;
\n\n· \nthe proposal also introduces a new category of\nairport: the 'network airport'. Such airports are not coordinated,\nbut are identified as important since they may offer alternatives\nduring times of network disruption. Thus, the proposal provides\nthat coordinators gather information on the operations at these\nairports.
\n4) Amendment of the '80-20' rule and definition of\na series of slots and resort to the airport charge system to\ndiscourage the late return of slots to the pool:
\n\n· \nin order for airlines to be granted priority for\nthe allocation of a given slot in the next corresponding scheduling\nseason, they need to have used at least 85 % of the allocated\nseries of slots (instead of 80 % at present);
\n\n· \nthe minimum series length (i.e. the minimum\nnumber of weekly slots required for priority allocation for the\nfollowing corresponding season) is raised from 5 to 15 for the\nsummer season and 10 for the winter season. Exceptions are provided\nfor certain types of traffic (charter) to take the characteristics\nof regional airports into account;
\n\n· \nlastly, to ensure that slots reserved prior to\nthe start of an operating season are in fact operated as planned by\nairlines, the proposal would authorise airports to use an airport\ncharge system to dissuade air carriers from belatedly returning\nslots to the pool.
\nBUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no\nimplications for the EU budget.
\nDELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions\nempowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance\nwith Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European\nUnion.
\nThe Council agreed a general approach on a\nrecast of the 1993 regulation on the allocation of landing and\ntake-off slots at EU airports that face capacity\nproblems.
\nThe revision is intended to tackle growing airport\ncongestion by introducing a series of measures:
\nThe main outstanding issue that needed to be settled\nby ministers concerned the possibility for airlines to sell and\nbuy slots. Some delegations requested the introduction of\nsafeguards because of concerns about the possible negative impact\nof secondary trading on - economically less profitable - regional\nflights or about the potential speculative use of traded slots.\nOther delegations, however, as well as the Commission, stressed the\nneed for a uniform application of the system, pointing to the risk\nof market fragmentation.
\nAs a compromise acceptable to the majority of\ndelegations, the text of the draft regulation tabled by the\nPresidency has been amended to allow Member States to apply\ntemporary restrictions where a significant and demonstrable problem\nwith secondary trading occurs. Such restrictions must be\ntransparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate, justified and\ncommunicated to the Commission, which has the right to oppose them.\nMember States will be obliged to comply with the Commission's\ndecision, which must also be justified.
\nIn addition, still within the framework of the\nsecondary trading scheme, conditions have been slightly relaxed as\nregards the use of re-timed slots received after an exchange of\nnewly acquired slots, which is allowed only in order to improve\nthe slot timings for the services concerned. It was agreed that\nsuch re-timed slots need not necessarily be operated during a full\nscheduling period.
\nThe compromise achieved also includes a number of\nchanges to other parts of the Draft Regulation:
\nAs regards the changes proposed by the Commission to\nthe current conditions for granting priority in slot allocation\nto carriers that already had the same slots in previous scheduling\nseasons (\"historical slots\"), the discussions in the Council's\npreparatory bodies had already shown that a large majority of\nMember States are against those changes. At the Council meeting,\nthe Commission reaffirmed its proposal to raise the minimum rate at\nwhich carriers must effectively have used the slots allocated from\nthe current 80% to 85% and the minimum number of slots to be\nrequested for the same time on the same day of the week (\"slot\nseries\") from the current 5 to 15 for the summer season and 10 for\nthe winter season. Most Member States, on the contrary, prefer to\nkeep the current system, pointing to the need for\nflexibility for airlines, notably in order to avoid empty flights\nbeing operated only in order to secure entitlement to the slots.\nHowever, it will be possible to increase the minimum number of\nslots required within the framework of local guidelines.
\nThe European Parliament, whose approval is also\nrequired for the adoption of the Regulation, has not yet determined\nits position on the proposal.
\nThe Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the\nreport by Giommaria UGGIAS (ALDE, IT) on the proposal for a\nRegulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common\nrules for the allocation of slots at EU airports (recast).\nIt recommends that the European Parliaments position in first\nreading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend\nthe Commission proposal as follows:
\n\nCoordinators role: in legal terms, the coordinator's\nessential functions, which consist of allocating slots in an equal\nand non-discriminatory manner, shall be given to a natural or legal\nperson who or which is not a service provider in the airport, an\nairline operating from the airport or the managing body of the\nairport in question. The committee adds that in order to prove\nthat he/she/it does not share common interests\nwith any such entities, the coordinator or schedules\nfacilitator must submit an annual declaration\nof his/her/its financial interests. Furthermore, the\ncomposition of the coordinator's board or supervisory function\nshall also be independent of the direct interests of the airport\nmanaging body, the airline users of that airport and any other\nentity representing a user or service provider. This shall not,\nhowever preclude representatives of such\norganisations from being members of a board or\nsupervisory function, provided that voting rights are\nbalanced.
\nMembers also add\nthat:
\nThe financing referred to shall be provided by all\nthe air carriers who operate in the coordinated and\nschedules facilitated airports, and by those airports in\nsuch a way as to ensure that the financial burden is distributed\nequitably among all interested parties and that the financing does\nnot largely depend on a sole interested party. Member\nStates shall launch a stakeholder consultation procedure,\nincorporating the possibility of an appeal, in order to ensure\ntransparent, non-discriminatory charging correlating to the service\nprovided by the coordinator or schedules facilitator. Collection of\nthe air carriers payments shall be the responsibility of the\nairports concerned, which shall pay those amounts to the\ncoordinator or schedules facilitator. Member States shall ensure\nthat adequate financial, human, technical and material\nresources and expertise are at the disposal of the\ncoordinator and the schedules facilitator, such as to enable\nthem to carryout their duties at all times.
\nThe coordinator and\nthe schedules facilitator shall furthermore submit to the\nCommission, to the Member States and to all\nparties involved in their financing a separate annual financial\nreport indicating in detail revenue and expenditure relating to\ntheir activities.
\nUsage rate:\nunder the Commission's proposal on airport slot allocation, a\nslot would be taken away from an airline if it is used\nless than 85% of the time. The current threshold is 80%. The\ncommittee states that raising the slot series usage rate to 85%\nseems excessive and is not an appropriate answer to congestion\nproblems. This rate would also lead to carriers flying\nempty in order not to lose their series allocation, which is\nhardly in keeping with the overriding need to address the\nenvironmental impact of this mode of transport. The rate would\ntherefore seem to be of little economic or environmental benefit.\nAn 80-20 ratio should therefore be maintained for series usage\nrates.
\nFinancial\nsanctions: rather than using general fees, Members specify that\nthe managing body of a coordinated airport must establish and\napply effective, proportionate and dissuasive financial\nsanctions to deal with the return of slots after the agreed\nHistoric Baseline Dates for the following winter or summer season,\nrespectively, or the retention of unused slots with the aim of\ndissuading air carriers from belatedly returning slots to the pool,\nand must hold them liable for having reserved airport\ninfrastructure without using it. The new text sets out a series of\nprinciples that must be respected in laying down sanctions.
\nRevenue from\nslots trading: Members specify that Member States may adopt\nmeasures to allocate a portion of the revenue generated from the\nslots trading to a fund in order to cover the costs of developing\nairport infrastructure and optimising related services. In the\ninterests of complete transparency, the fund in\nquestion shall be determined and approved by an\nindependent supervisory authority as referred to in\nDirective 2009/12/EC. The fund must at all times be\nmanaged in such a way as to ensure that the principles of separate\naccounting are followed, so that the financial amounts to be\nallocated from the fund to each airport can be established. The\nrevenues generated from the slot trading at one airport shall be\nreinvested at the same airport.
\nMonitoring of\nsecondary trading: lastly, the\nCommission shall monitor the secondary markets for slots\nbased on the data received from co-ordinators\nand shall report on relevant trends, including those\nrelating to regional and intra-Union connectivity, in its Annual\nAnalysis of Air Transport Markets.
\nThe European Parliament adopted by 565 votes to 69\nwith 26 abstentions a legislative resolution on the proposal for a\nregulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common\nrules for the allocation of slots at EU airports (recast).\nParliaments position in first reading following the ordinary\nlegislative procedure amends the Commission proposal as\nfollows:
\nDefinition of airport slots: Parliament notes that the relevant theory and case law\nhave not yet advanced sufficiently to produce an exhaustive legal\ndefinition of airport slots. As of now it is expedient to be able\nto work on the assumption that the use of slots in the public\ninterest - hence not in any strict sense a public good - may serve\nas a guideline for a legal definition. It is therefore appropriate\nto formulate a definition of slots that establishes that they may\nbecome subject to rights and that governs the allocation of slots.\nParliament adds that airport slots are non-material assets of\npublic utility whose use is subject to the conditions laid down in\nthis Regulation. They are therefore assigned by airport\ncoordinators so as to ensure maximum transparency, in\nthe interests of Member States, passengers, airport managers and\nair carriers.
\nSeries of slots is amended to mean at least five slots which\nhave been requested for the same time on the same day of the week\nregularly in the same scheduling period and allocated by the\ncoordinator on that basis or, if that is not possible, allocated at\napproximately the same time, unless agreed otherwise through a\nlocal rule under the conditions referred to in the text. The\nCommission proposal had stated that series of\nslots should mean at least 15 slots for a summer scheduling\nperiod and 10 slots for a winter scheduling period requested for\nthe same time on the same day of the week for consecutive\nweeks.
\nCoordinators role: Members strengthened provisions regarding the\nindependence of the coordinator. The draft regulation states that\nin legal terms, the coordinator's essential functions, which\nconsist of allocating slots in an equal and non-discriminatory\nmanner, shall be given to a natural or legal person who or which is\nnot a service provider in the airport, an airline operating from\nthe airport or the managing body of the airport in question.\nParliament adds that in order to prove that he/she/it does not\nshare common interests with any such entities, the coordinator or\nschedules facilitator must submit an annual declaration of\nhis/her/its financial interests. Furthermore, the composition of\nthe coordinator's board or supervisory function shall also be\nindependent of the direct interests of the airport managing body,\nthe airline users of that airport and any other entity representing\na user or service provider. This shall not, however preclude\nrepresentatives of such organisations from being members of a board\nor supervisory function, provided that voting rights are\nbalanced.
\nMembers also add that:
\nThe financing referred to shall be provided by all\nthe air carriers who operate in the coordinated and schedules\nfacilitated airports, and by those airports in such a way as to\nensure that the financial burden is distributed equitably\namong all interested parties and that the financing does not\nlargely depend on a sole interested party. Member States shall\nlaunch a stakeholder consultation procedure, incorporating the\npossibility of an appeal, in order to ensure transparent,\nnon-discriminatory charging correlating to the service provided by\nthe coordinator or schedules facilitator. Collection of the air\ncarriers payments shall be the responsibility of the airports\nconcerned, which shall pay those amounts to the coordinator or\nschedules facilitator. Member States shall ensure that adequate\nfinancial, human, technical and material resources and\nexpertise are at the disposal of the coordinator and the\nschedules facilitator, such as to enable them to carryout their\nduties at all times.
\nThe coordinator and the schedules facilitator shall\nfurthermore submit to the Commission, to the Member States and to\nall parties involved in their financing a separate annual\nfinancial report indicating in detail revenue and expenditure\nrelating to their activities.
\nThe electronic database for which the\ncoordinator is responsible shall be freely accessible for all\ninterested parties upon request, including the European\nParliament, and contain the information prescribed in the\ntext.
\nLocal rules: Members\nspecify that local rules shall concern the allocation and\nmonitoring of slots and may be applied only where it can be\nproved that an airport reaches an alarming level of congestion\nand that performance or throughput improvements can therefore be\ndelivered through locally applied rules. Such local rules shall be\ntransparent and non-discriminatory, and shall be agreed on in the\ncoordination committee. The Commission proposal had specified\ninstead that the local guidelines might only concern the monitoring\nof the use of slots allocated or the amendment of the definition of\na series of slots to reduce its length below 10 slots for the\nwinter scheduling period or below 15 slots for the summer\nscheduling period, but under no circumstances below 5\nslots.
\nUsage rate: under the\nCommission's proposal on airport slot allocation, a slot would be\ntaken away from an airline if it is used less than 85% of the time.\nThe current threshold is 80%. However, Parliament rejected the\nproposal to raise the slot series usage rate to 85% and maintains\nin the text an 80-20 ratio for series usage\nrates.
\nMembers add that slots shall be returned to the pool\nwhen they are not being used after the expiry of a maximum\nperiod of six months. When a route no longer meets the\nrequirement for Public Service Obligations slots reservation, the\nslots shall either be reserved for another route subject to public\nservice obligations or shall remain with the air carrier which was\nusing them if the requirement laid down in the Regulation has been\nmet for the series concerned.
\nFinancial sanctions: rather than using general fees, Members specify that\nthe managing body of a coordinated airport must establish and apply\neffective, proportionate and dissuasive financial sanctions\nto deal with the return of slots after the agreed Historic Baseline\nDates for the following winter or summer season, respectively, or\nthe retention of unused slots with the aim of dissuading air\ncarriers from belatedly returning slots to the pool, and must hold\nthem liable for having reserved airport infrastructure without\nusing it. The new text sets out a series of principles that must be\nrespected in laying down sanctions. Members stipulate that the\nsystem of sanctions shall be revenue-neutral for the airport\nmanaging body and shall be aimed solely at increasing the\nefficiency of time slot allocation.
\nThese sanctions must be in place not later than one\nyear after the adoption of the Regulation. Member States shall\nduly inform the Commission, which shall assess the effectiveness of\nthe sanctions in question.
\nWhere a financial sanction is necessary, it shall\napply to each individual failure by an air carrier to comply with\nthe relevant provisions, and shall have a pre-determined minimum\nvalue, to be set by the Member State concerned. Multiple\ninfringements may give rise to the imposition of a series of\nfinancial sanctions and may result in, for example, the doubling of\nthe financial penalty for each further infringement. The\ncoordinator shall be duly informed of the imposition of penalties.\nDecisions to impose financial sanctions shall be published by the\ncoordinator.
\nRevenue from slots trading: Parliament specifies that Member States may adopt\nmeasures to allocate a portion of the revenue generated from the\nslots trading to a fund in order to cover the costs of developing\nairport infrastructure and optimising related services. In the\ninterests of complete transparency, the fund in question shall be\ndetermined and approved by an independent supervisory authority as\nreferred to in Directive 2009/12/EC. The fund must at all times be\nmanaged in such a way as to ensure that the principles of separate\naccounting are followed, so that the financial amounts to be\nallocated from the fund to each airport can be established. The\nrevenues generated from the slot trading at one airport shall be\nreinvested at the same airport.
\nMonitoring of secondary trading: Parliament approves the Commissions view that\nthe allocation and use of slots could be made more effective by\nintroducing slot exchange mechanisms, by ensuring that the unused\nslots are made available to interested operators as soon as\npossible and in a transparent manner, and by reinforcing the\nunderlying principles of the system with regard to the allocation,\nmanagement and use of the slots. In addition, it is important that\naccess to hub airports from regional airports be maintained where\nsuch routes are essential to the economy of the region in question.\nTherefore, concerns regarding efficient allocation of slots\nmust continue to be balanced against the need to protect the\nexternal benefits of air transport services and in particular the\nvalue that they create for European regions.
\nLastly, Parliament adds that the\nCommission shall monitor the secondary markets for slots\nbased on the data received from co-ordinators\nand shall report on relevant trends, including those\nrelating to regional and intra-Union connectivity, in its Annual\nAnalysis of Air Transport Markets.
\n