Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Opinion | BUDG | ||
Opinion | ECON | ||
Lead | LIBE | MCINTYRE Anthea (ECR) | DÍAZ DE MERA GARCÍA CONSUEGRA Agustín (PPE), PAPADOPOULOU Antigoni (S&D), ALFANO Sonia (ALDE), TAVARES Rui (Verts/ALE), DE JONG Dennis (GUE/NGL) |
Legal Basis TFEU 133
Activites
- 2014/04/05 Final act published in Official Journal
- #3302
-
2014/03/11
Council Meeting
-
2014/03/11
End of procedure in Parliament
-
2014/03/11
Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
-
2013/12/11
Results of vote in Parliament
- Results of vote in Parliament
-
T7-0552/2013
summary
The European Parliament adopted by 528 votes to 4, with 9 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting (the 'Pericles 2020' programme). Parliament adopted its position at first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure. The amendments adopted in plenary are the result of a compromise reached between the European Parliament and the Council. They amend the Commission proposal as follows: Subject matter: Members stipulated that the multiannual action programme should seek to promote actions for the protection and safeguarding of the euro against counterfeiting and related fraud. Added value: the Programme should actively encourage and entail an increase in transnational cooperation for the protection of the euro inside and outside the Union and with the Union's trading partners, and with attention also being paid to those Member States or third countries that have the highest rates of euro counterfeiting, as shown by the relevant reports issued by the competent authorities; this cooperation shall contribute to the greater effectiveness of these operations through the sharing of best practice, common standards and joint specialised training. Financial envelope: Parliament proposed that the financial envelope for the implementation of the Programme for the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020 should be set at EUR 7 344 000 (in current prices). The Commission shall not depart from said indicative allocation of funds by more than 10 %. Should it prove necessary to exceed that limit, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts to modify the indicative allocation of funds laid down in the Annex. The annual appropriations shall be authorised by the European Parliament and the Council within the limits of the multiannual financial framework. Financial support should take the form of: (a) grants; (b) public procurement. The co-financing rate for grants should not exceed 75 % of the eligible costs with a level of 90% in exceptional circumstances. Eligible actions include: (i) exchange and dissemination of information; (ii) technical, scientific and operational assistance; (iii) grants to finance the purchase of equipment to be used by specialised anti-counterfeiting authorities. A minimum of 90 % of the budget shall be allocated to these actions. Europol, Eurojust and Interpol, private entities and other bodies offering specific expertise, including, where appropriate, such bodies from third countries and in particular from accession candidate countries may organise joint actions. Annual work programmes: in order to implement the Programme, the Commission should adopt annual work programmes. They should set out the following: the actions to be undertaken in accordance with the general and specific objectives, including the indicative allocation of financial resources and the method of implementation; the essential selection criteria for grants and the maximum possible rate of cofinancing. Resources allocated to communication actions under the Programme shall also contribute to cover the corporate communication of the Union's political priorities, as far as they are related to the general objectives of the Programme. Protection of the financial interests of the Union: the Commission may also take appropriate measures (administrative and financial penalties) ensuring that, when actions financed under this Regulation are implemented, the financial interests of the Union are protected. The European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF) may carry out investigations, including on-the-spot checks and inspections, with a view to establishing whether there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union. Evaluations: by 31 December 2017, an independent mid-term evaluation report should be presented by the Commission on the achievement of the objectives of all the measures, the efficient and cost effective use of resources and its added value to the Union. It should be prepared with a view to informing a decision on the renewal, modification or suspension of the measures. A final evaluation report should be presented by 31 December 2021. For reasons of urgency, this Regulation should enter into force as soon as possible after its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
-
2013/12/02
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
-
A7-0423/2013
summary
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the report by Anthea McINTYRE (ECR, UK) the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting (the 'Pericles 2020' programme). The committee recommended that Parliament adopt its position in first reading, following the ordinary legislative procedure, and amend the Commission proposal as follows: Subject matter: Members stipulated that the multiannual action programme should seek to promote actions for the protection and safeguarding of the euro against counterfeiting and related fraud. Added value: the amended text stipulated that the Programme shall actively encourage and entail an increase in transnational cooperation for the protection of the euro inside and outside the Union and with the Union's trading partners, and with attention also being paid to those Member States or third countries that have the highest rates of euro counterfeiting, as shown by the relevant reports issued by the competent authorities; this cooperation shall contribute to the greater effectiveness of these operations through the sharing of best practice, common standards and joint specialised training. Financial envelope: Members proposed that the financial envelope for the implementation of the Programme for the period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020 should be set at EUR 7 344 000 (in current prices). The Commission shall not depart from said indicative allocation of funds by more than 10 %. Should it prove necessary to exceed that limit, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts to modify the indicative allocation of funds laid down in the Annex. The annual appropriations shall be authorised by the European Parliament and the Council within the limits of the multiannual financial framework. Financial support should take the form of: (a) grants; (b) public procurement. The co-financing rate for grants should not exceed 75 % of the eligible costs with a level of 90% in exceptional circumstances. Eligible actions include: (i) exchange and dissemination of information; (ii) technical, scientific and operational assistance; (iii) grants to finance the purchase of equipment to be used by specialised anti-counterfeiting authorities. A minimum of 90 % of the budget shall be allocated to these actions. Annual work programmes: in order to implement the Programme, the Commission should adopt annual work programmes. They should set out the following: the actions to be undertaken in accordance with the general and specific objectives, including the indicative allocation of financial resources and the method of implementation; the essential selection criteria for grants and the maximum possible rate of cofinancing. Resources allocated to communication actions under the Programme shall also contribute to cover the corporate communication of the Union's political priorities, as far as they are related to the general objectives of the Programme. Evaluations: Members proposed that an evaluation of the Programme should be carried out by the Commission. By 31 December 2017, an independent mid-term evaluation report should be presented by the Commission on the achievement of the objectives of all the measures, the efficient and cost effective use of resources and its added value to the Union. It should be prepared with a view to informing a decision on the renewal, modification or suspension of the measures. A final evaluation report should be presented by 31 December 2021.
-
A7-0423/2013
summary
-
2013/11/27
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
-
2012/01/19
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
2011/12/19
Legislative proposal published
-
COM(2011)0913
summary
PURPOSE: to establish, from 2014 to 2020, an exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting (the 'Pericles 2020' programme). PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. BACKGROUND: the euro continues to be an attractive target for organised crime groups active in counterfeiting money, not only in Europe but also in other regions of the world. The international dimension of the threat with respect to euro counterfeiting calls for supranational coordination in facing it; through the Pericles programme, the Commission conducts such coordination by way of exchanges, training activities and technical assistance. Activities with the aim of promoting exchanges of information and staff, technical and scientific assistance and specialised training help significantly to protect Europe’s single currency against counterfeiting and related fraud and therefore to attain a high and equivalent level of protection across the Union. Past support for such initiatives, through Council Decision 2001/923/EC establishing an exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting (the "Pericles" programme), has made it possible to enhance the activities of the Union and the Member States in the field of the protection of the euro against counterfeiting. The objectives of the Pericles programme for both the period 2002-2006 and the period 2007-2013 were successfully achieved. The Treaty reflects concerns about the protection of the euro by providing for the measures necessary for its use as a single currency. As the legal basis for Pericles will expire at the end of 2013, its replacement should ensure the continuity of Union support for the activities carried out by the Commission and the Member States. IMPACT ASSESSMENT: four options have been considered: Option 1: continue the programme with the same level of funding (baseline scenario). Option 2: renew the Pericles programme with improved objectives and methodology, including in particular an increased maximum rate of co-financing. Option 3: merge Pericles with other Commission programmes. Option 4: discontinue the Pericles programme, and leave it for Member States to organise activities at national level for protecting the euro. The option to renew the programme with improved objectives and methodology is preferred (Option 2). This option has a budgetary allocation in real prices that remains similar to the current allocation (approximately one million euro per year). It adds flexibility in determining the amount of the grant by simplifying the determination of costs to be borne by Member States; it broadens the range of eligible activities by making it possible to finance the purchase of equipment to be used by specialised anti-counterfeiting agencies in for protecting the euro against counterfeiting; and it increases the rate of co-financing up to a maximum of 90 % of eligible costs, in duly justified cases. The higher rate of co-financing will particularly facilitate a more balanced geographic distribution of activities by offering wider scope for Member States to apply. LEGAL BASIS: Article 133 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The application of the Pericles programme will be extended to the Member States that have not adopted the euro as their single currency, through a proposal for a parallel Regulation based on Article 352 TFEU. CONTENT: the Commission proposes to establish a multiannual action programme ‘Pericles 2020’ to promote activities for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting and related fraud. The Programme shall run from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020. The Programme shall contribute to increased transnational cooperation for the protection of the euro at Union level and internationally and to the greater effectiveness of these operations on the basis of best practices, common standards and joint specialised training. The general objective of the Programme shall be to prevent and combat counterfeiting and fraud thus enhancing the competitiveness of the European economy and securing the sustainability of public finances. The specific objective of the Programme shall be to protect the euro banknotes and coins against counterfeiting and related fraud, by supporting and supplement the measures undertaken by the Member States and assisting the competent national and European authorities in their efforts to develop between themselves and with the European Commission a close and regular cooperation, also including third countries and international organisations. This objective shall be measured, inter alia, through the effectiveness of action by financial, technical, law-enforcement and judicial authorities, as measured through the number of counterfeits detected, illegal workshops dismantled, individuals arrested and sanctions imposed. The Pericles programme concerns this specific sphere of activity of the European Commission and its cooperation with Member States’ competent authorities, as well as with the other European institutions and bodies, more particularly through OLAF. Support from programmes designed to have a wider impact would be less effective in addressing such a specific issue and, in political terms, the EU institutions should demonstrate that they share a real determination to deal with this important aspect of EU policy and European identity. Accordingly, the Pericles programme will: target exclusively the protection of the euro, in the context of a long-term vision that is consistent with other EU objectives, on the basis of the priorities set each year for this specific field of expertise; allow the implementation of other EU programmes to focus on priorities other than the protection of the euro; fully take into account the results of the activities already co-financed in the past in this field, including in terms of targeted rules for beneficiaries and geographical balance; aim not only to have a direct impact on the situation of some Member States but to place strong emphasis on the EU dimension of the protection of Europe’s single currency. The Pericles 2020 programme will make a substantial contribution to maintaining and further improving the high level of protection of the euro associated with the intensification of cross-border cooperation, exchanges and assistance. At the same time, overall savings will be achieved from the collectively organised activities and procurement, as compared to potential individual national initiatives. Priorities and implementation strategies are regularly discussed at meetings of the Euro Counterfeiting Experts Group (ECEG). The ECEG coordinates and is associated with the implementation of Pericles activities. In addition, the objectives have been renewed with special attention to setting Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant and Time-bound (SMART) criteria. This will also help to ensure proper implementation and monitoring. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the overall budget is EUR 7 700 000 in current prices. This amount is in line with the Commission proposal for the next Multiannual Financial Framework for the period 2014-2020: ‘A Budget for Europe 2020’.
- DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/olaf/', 'title': 'European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)'}, ŠEMETA Algirdas
-
COM(2011)0913
summary
Documents
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2011)0913
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0423/2013
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T7-0552/2013
- : Regulation 2014/331
- : OJ L 103 05.04.2014, p. 0001
Amendments | Dossier |
23 |
2011/0449(COD)
2012/09/06
LIBE
23 amendments...
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) The Union and the Member States have set themselves the objective of laying down the measures necessary for the use of the euro as a single currency. These measures include protecting the euro against counterfeiting and related fraud thus empowering the effectiveness of the European economy and securing the sustainability of public finances.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The Commission carried out an impact assessment in 2011, so as to evaluate whether or not the programme should be continued. The outcome was that it should be renewed with improved objectives and methodology.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) The financial interests of the Union should be protected through proportionate measures throughout the expenditure cycle, including the prevention, detection and investigation of irregularities, the recovery of funds lost, wrongly paid or incorrectly used and, where appropriate,
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 The Programme shall
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 The specific objective of the Programme shall be to protect the euro banknotes and coins against counterfeiting and related fraud, by supporting and supplement the measures undertaken by the Member States and assisting the competent national and European authorities in their efforts to develop between themselves and with the European Commission a close and regular cooperation and an exchange of best practices, also including third countries and international organisations.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 The specific objective of the Programme shall be to protect the euro banknotes and coins against counterfeiting and related fraud, by supporting and supplementing the measures undertaken by the Member States and assisting the competent national and European authorities in their efforts to develop between themselves and with the European Commission a close and regular cooperation, also including third countries
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) judicial officers
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) EU citizens who should be aware through education and awareness-raising campaigns on euro counterfeiting how to be protected during their everyday consumptions.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point g a (new) (ga) private entities that have developed and provided evidence of technical knowledge and/or teams specialising in detecting counterfeit notes and coins.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 4 – point a – introductory part (a) Exchange and dissemination of information, in particular through organising workshops, meetings and seminars, targeted placements and exchanges of staff of competent national authorities and other similar activities. The exchange of information will be targeted inter alia at:
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 4 – point a – introductory part (a) Exchange of information
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 4 – point a – indent 7 a (new) – relevant technical and statistical data based on ECB's counterfeits database;
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 4 – point b – indent 1 – any measure which establishes teaching resources at European Union level (handbook of EU legislation, information bulletins, practical manuals, glossaries and lexicons, a register of coin-like objects that could be misused as euro coins, databases, especially in the area
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 4 – point c (c) Grants to finance the purchase of equipment to be used by specialised anti- counterfeiting authorities for protecting the euro against counterfeiting, in keeping with Article 10(3).
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 4 4. The co-financing rate for grants awarded under the programme shall not exceed 80 % of the eligible costs. In exceptional and duly justified cases, defined in the annual work programme referred to in Article 11, the co-financing rate shall not exceed 90 % of the eligible costs. This increase in co-financing is necessary in order to give the Member States greater economic flexibility, thus enabling them to carry out and complete projects to protect and safeguard the euro in a satisfactory manner.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 In order to implement the programme the
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 Budget allocated to communication actions to be carried out by the Commission under this Regulation shall also cover the corporate communication of the political priorities of the European Union within the context of the scope of the Programme.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 1. The Programme shall be implemented by the Commission in cooperation with the Member States, through consultations at different stages of the implementation of the Programme, within the appropriate advisory committee provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1338/2001, taking into account relevant measures undertaken by other competent entities, in particular the ECB and Europol. The Commission shall
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall take appropriate measures ensuring that, when acti
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 3. The European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF) may carry out investigations, including on-the-spot checks and inspections
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 4. Without prejudice to
source: PE-494.709
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c |
activities/2/committees/2/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c |
activities/3/committees/2/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c |
committees/2/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|