{"change_dates":[],"dossier":{"amendments":[{"authors":"Gesine Meissner, Ramon Tremosa i Balcells","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-22","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 1 a (new)"]],"meps":[96870,97203],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:22"},"new":["(1a) The first successes have become","apparent since Eel Management Plans","came into force in 2009. However, the","status of European eel stocks remains","critical and further actions are therefore","necessary. These actions should take into","consideration the importance of eel","fishery for the recreation of the stocks."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"22","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Gesine Meissner, Ramon Tremosa i Balcells","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-23","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 1 b (new)"]],"meps":[96870,97203],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:22"},"new":["(1b) A sustainable eel fishery in Europe","can be only achieved if the export of glass","eel to Asia and the re-importation of","European eel from Asia are strictly","restricted and the implementation of these","restrictions is tightly controlled."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"23","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Alain Cadec","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-24","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 3"]],"meps":[96849],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:22"},"new":["(3) In order to apply certain provisions of","Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007, it would","be appropriate to delegate to the","Commission the power to adopt acts in","accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty","on the Functioning of the European Union,","in respect of taking measures to address a","significant decline of average market prices","for eels used for restocking, as compared to","those of eels used for other purposes. It is","of particular importance that the","Commission carry out appropriate","consultations during its preparatory work,","including at expert level. The","Commission, when preparing and","drawing up delegated acts, should ensure","a simultaneous and timely transmission of","relevant documents to the European","Parliament and to the Council."],"old":["(3) In order to apply certain provisions of","Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007, the power","to adopt acts in accordance with Article","290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the","European Union should be delegated to","the Commission in respect of taking","measures to address a significant decline of","average market prices for eels used for","restocking, as compared to those of eels","used for other purposes."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"24","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Maria do C\u00e9u Patr\u00e3o Neves","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-25","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Recital 4"]],"meps":[96902],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:23"},"new":["(4) It is of particular importance that the","Commission carry out appropriate","consultations during its preparatory work","for the adoption of delegated acts,","especially at expert level, so as to ensure","that the information available to it will be","impartial, accurate, complete, and up to","date."],"old":["(4) It is of particular importance that the","Commission carry out appropriate","consultations during its preparatory work","for the adoption of delegated acts,","including at expert level."],"orig_lang":"pt","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"25","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Nils Torvalds","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-26","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 4"]],"meps":[114268],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:23"},"new":["(4) It is of particular importance that the","Commission carry out appropriate","consultations during its preparatory work,","based on latest scientific advice and","scientific recommendations, for the","adoption of delegated acts, including at","expert level."],"old":["(4) It is of particular importance that the","Commission carry out appropriate","consultations during its preparatory work","for the adoption of delegated acts,","including at expert level."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"26","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Maria do C\u00e9u Patr\u00e3o Neves","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-27","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 6"]],"meps":[96902],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:23"},"new":["(6) In order to ensure uniform conditions","for the implementation of the provisions of","Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007 concerning","the approval of Eel Management Plans by","the Commission on the basis of the best","and most recent technical and scientific","information available, implementing","powers should be conferred upon the","Commission. Those powers should be","exercised in accordance with Regulation","(EU) No 182/2011 of the European","Parliament and of the Council of","16 February 2011 laying down the rules","and general principles concerning","mechanisms for control by Member States","of the Commission\u2019s exercise of","implementing powers."],"old":["(6) In order to ensure uniform conditions","for the implementation of the provisions of","Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007 concerning","the approval of Eel Management Plans by","the Commission on the basis of technical","and scientific data, implementing powers","should be conferred upon the Commission.","Those powers should be exercised in","accordance with Regulation (EU)","No 182/2011 of the European Parliament","and of the Council of 16 February 2011","laying down the rules and general","principles concerning mechanisms for","control by Member States of the","Commission\u2019s exercise of implementing","powers."],"orig_lang":"pt","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"27","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Dani\u00ebl van der Stoep","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-28","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Recital 7"]],"meps":[96946],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:23"},"new":["(7) The Commission will not be in a","position to report to the European","Parliament and the Council on the","measures concerning restocking, including","the evolution of market prices by 1 July","2011, due to late transmission by some","Member States of the relevant information.","The deadline for this report should","therefore be postponed to 31 December","2014."],"old":["(7) The Commission will not be in a","position to report to the European","Parliament and the Council on the","measures concerning restocking, including","the evolution of market prices by 1 July","2011, due to late transmission by some","Member States of the relevant information.","The deadline for this report should","therefore be postponed to 31 December","2012."],"orig_lang":"nl","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"28","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Isabelle Thomas","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-29","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Recital 7 a (new)"]],"meps":[114279],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:23"},"new":["(7a) It is important that the Commission","penalise Member States which have not","forwarded or analysed all the data","available to them to allow an exhaustive","and scientifically sound inventory of the","situation regarding European eel to be","drawn up."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"29","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Isabelle Thomas","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-30","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 7 b (new)"]],"meps":[114279],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:23"},"new":["(7b) In order to clarify the situation","regarding European eel, it is important","that the ICES, in its opinion of 2013,","make reference to all the causes of the","reduction in eel stocks and to the issues in","connection with eel spawning grounds,","not least in the Mediterranean."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"30","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Struan Stevenson","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-31","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 11 a (new)"]],"meps":[4546],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:23"},"new":["(11a) European eels are a species with a","very particular lifecycle; travelling to","European coasts to access the natural","habitat (freshwater systems and wetlands)","and then returning to the ocean to spawn.","A lasting solution to allow the recovery of","the eel population is to unblock migratory","pathways by modifying lock gates,","screening hydro-electric power turbines","and water pumps."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"31","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Struan Stevenson","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-32","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Recital 11 b (new)"]],"meps":[4546],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:23"},"new":["(11b) As long as migratory pathways","remain closed, restocking is the only","temporary measure to help the eel","recover. When transfers of glass eels are","conducted following available best","practices, such as the Sustainable Eel","standard, they are an efficient way of","boosting eel recovery. Another temporary","measure to boost silver eel escapement is","transferring them with human support","over obstacles such as dykes, hydro power","stations and water pumps. At a time when","fishermen are looking to find an","alternative occupation, their skills could","be used to accelerate the European eel","recovery."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"32","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Jens Nilsson","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-33","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 1 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 1a (new)"],[" Regulation (EC) n\u00ba 1100/2007","Article 2 \u2013 paragraph 10"]],"meps":[111024],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:23"},"new":["(1a) In Article 2, paragraph 10 is replaced","by the following:","\u201810. In the Eel Management Plan, each","Member State shall implement as soon as","possible appropriate measures to reduce","the mortality caused on eel by factors","outside the fishery, including","hydroelectric turbines and pumps.","Further measures shall be taken where","necessary to reduce mortality caused by","other factors, so as to meet the targets of","the Plan.\u2019"],"orig_lang":"sv","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"33","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Pat the Cope Gallagher","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-34","justification":"It is grossly unfair to suspend the fishery of eel without providing proper compensation to the\nfishermen and processors in the interest of fairness and equity. Banning the fishing and\npreventing the opportunity to restock is of questionable benefit for the recovery of eel stocks.\nThese measures, even if effective, cannot restore the stock for at least fifteen years after their\nimposition. The fishermen are therefore being heavily penalised with immediate effect and\nwithout any guarantee of a return to their former wellbeing. A precedent already exists in\nfisheries legislation at an EU level whereby Italian drift net fishermen have received\ncompensation after the EU ban on tuna drift net fishing in 1997. There was also a scheme for\nall community fishermen introduced in December 1998 (Council Decision 1999/27/EC).","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 1 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 1a (new)"],["Regulation (EC) n\u00ba 1100/2007","Article 2 \u2013 paragraph 12a (new)"]],"meps":[2125],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:23"},"new":["(1a) In Article 2, the following paragraph","is inserted:","\"12a. Member States which prohibit","fishing for eel, the processing of eel and","selling of eel caught in a river basin","within their national territory shall","provide funding to fishermen and","processors to support relevant","diversification schemes.\""],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"34","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Jens Nilsson","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-35","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 1 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 2"],["Regulation (EC) n\u00ba 1100/2007","Article 3"]],"meps":[111024],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:23"},"new":["(2) Article 3 is replaced by the following:","\u2018The Commission shall, in the light of the","report referred to in paragraph 2, propose","no later than 31 March 2014 any","appropriate measures to achieve with high","probability the recovery of the stock of","European eel and the Council shall","decide by qualified majority on alternative","measures to achieve the escapement target","level set out in Article 2(4) or a reduction","of fishing effort in accordance with","Articles 4(2) and 5(4).\u2019"],"old":["(2) Article 3 is deleted."],"orig_lang":"sv","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"35","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Martina Anderson, James Nicholson, Diane Dodds, Pat the Cope Gallagher","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-36","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 1 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 3 a (new)"],[" Regulation (EC) n\u00ba 1100/2007","Article 5 \u2013 paragraph 4"]],"meps":[113959,1318,96951,2125],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:24"},"new":["(3a) In Article 5, paragraph 4 is replaced","by the following:","\"4. A Member State which has submitted","an Eel Management Plan to the","Commission for approval not later than","31 December 2008, which cannot be","approved by the Commission in","accordance with paragraph 1 or which","does not adhere to the reporting and","evaluation conditions set out in Article 9,","shall either reduce fishing effort by at","least 50 % relative to the average effort","deployed from 2004 to 2006 or reduce","fishing effort to ensure a reduction in eel","catches by at least 50 % relative to the","average catch from 2004 to 2006, either","by shortening the fishing season for eel or","by other means. This reduction shall be","implemented within three months of the","decision not to approve the plan or within","three months of failure to meet a","reporting deadline.\""],"old":[""],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"36","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Maria do C\u00e9u Patr\u00e3o Neves","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-37","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 1 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 4 \u2013 subparagraph 1"],["Regulation (EC) n\u00ba 1100/2007","Article 7 \u2013 paragraph 6"]],"meps":[96902],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:24"},"new":["\u201c6. In the event of a significant decline, in","money and percentage terms, in average","market prices for eels used for restocking,","as compared to those of eels used for other","purposes, the Member State concerned","shall inform the Commission. The","Commission, by means of delegated acts","adopted in accordance with Article 12a and","in order to address the situation, may","temporarily reduce the percentages of eels","used for restocking as referred to in","paragraph 2."],"old":["\u201c6. In the event of a significant decline of","average market prices for eels used for","restocking, as compared to those of eels","used for other purposes, the Member State","concerned shall inform the Commission.","The Commission, by means of delegated","acts adopted in accordance with","Article 12a and in order to address the","situation, may temporarily reduce the","percentages of eels used for restocking as","referred to in paragraph 2."],"orig_lang":"pt","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"37","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Martina Anderson, Pat the Cope Gallagher, James Nicholson, Diane Dodds","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-38","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 1 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 4"],["Regulation (EC) n\u00ba 1100/2007","Article 7 \u2013 paragraphs 6 and 7"]],"meps":[113959,2125,1318,96951],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:24"},"new":["6. In the event of a significant decline of","average market prices for eels used for","restocking, as compared to those of eels","used for other purposes, the Member State","concerned shall inform the Commission.","The Commission, by means of delegated","acts adopted in accordance with Article","12a and in order to address the situation,","may temporarily reduce the percentages of","eels used for restocking as referred to in","paragraph 2 where the Eel Management","Plan is in compliance with Article 2(4).","7. The Commission shall, not later than 31","December 2012, report to the European","Parliament and the Council and evaluate","the measures concerning restocking","including the evolution of market process.","The Commission shall, not later than 31","October 2013, report to the European","Parliament and the Council and evaluate","the measures concerning restocking,","taking into account the latest scientific","advice on the conditions under which","restocking is likely to contribute to the","increase of the spawning stock biomass."],"old":["6. In the event of a significant decline of","average market prices for eels used for","restocking, as compared to those of eels","used for other purposes, the Member State","concerned shall inform the Commission.","The Commission, by means of delegated","acts adopted in accordance with Article","12a and in order to address the situation,","may temporarily reduce the percentages of","eels used for restocking as referred to in","paragraph 2.","7. The Commission shall, not later than 31","December 2012, report to the European","Parliament and the Council and evaluate","the measures concerning restocking","including the evolution of market prices."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"38","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Alain Cadec","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-39","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 1 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 4 \u2013 subparagraph 1"],[" Regulation (EC) n\u00ba 1100/2007","Article 7 \u2013 paragraph 6"]],"meps":[96849],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:24"},"new":["6. In the event of a significant decline of","average market prices for eels used for","restocking, as compared to those of eels","used for other purposes, the Member State","concerned shall inform the Commission","within a reasonable time limit. The","Commission, by means of delegated acts","adopted in accordance with Article 12a and","in order to address the situation, may","temporarily reduce the percentages of eels","used for restocking as referred to in","paragraph 2."],"old":["6. In the event of a significant decline of","average market prices for eels used for","restocking, as compared to those of eels","used for other purposes, the Member State","concerned shall inform the Commission.","The Commission, by means of delegated","acts adopted in accordance with Article","","","12a and in order to address the situation,","may temporarily reduce the percentages of","eels used for restocking as referred to in","paragraph 2."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"39","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Maria do C\u00e9u Patr\u00e3o Neves","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-40","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 1 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 4 \u2013 subparagraph 2"],["Regulation (EC) n\u00ba 1100/2007","Article 7 \u2013 paragraph 7"]],"meps":[96902],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:24"},"new":["7. The Commission shall, not later than","31 December 2012, report to the European","Parliament and the Council and evaluate","the measures concerning restocking,","including a detailed description of the","evolution of market prices and the annual","average variations in the Member States.\u201d"],"old":["7. The Commission shall, not later than","31 December 2012, report to the European","Parliament and the Council and evaluate","the measures concerning restocking","including the evolution of market prices."],"orig_lang":"pt","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"40","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Jens Nilsson","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-41","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 1 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 4 a (new)"],["Regulation (EC) n\u00ba 1100/2007","Article 7 \u2013 paragraph 8"]],"meps":[111024],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:24"},"new":["(4a) In Article 7, the following is inserted","at the end of paragraph 8:","\u2018\u2013 it concerns eels caught and managed","using methods and equipment that","guarantee the lowest possible mortality","during catch, storage, transport and","breeding,","\u2013 it takes place in areas affording a high","probability of survival and migration,","\u2013 the eels are quarantined in order to","prevent the spread of any diseases or","parasites.\u2019"],"old":["",""],"orig_lang":"sv","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"41","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Martina Anderson, Pat the Cope Gallagher, Diane Dodds, James Nicholson","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-42","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 1 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 4a (new)"],[" Regulation (EC) n\u00ba 1100/2007","Article 7 \u2013 paragraph 8"]],"meps":[113959,2125,96951,1318],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:24"},"new":["(4a) In Article 7, paragraph 8 is replaced","by the following:","\"Restocking shall be deemed to be a","conservation measure for the purposes of","Article 38(2) of (insert new EMFF","Regulation), provided that:","- it is part of an Eel Management Plan","established in accordance with Article 2,","- it concerns eels less than 20 cm in","length, and","- it contributes to the achievement of the","40 % target level of escapement as","referred to in Article 2(4).\""],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"42","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Isabelle Thomas","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-43","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 1 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 5"],[" Regulation (EC) n\u00ba 1100/2007","Article 9"]],"meps":[114279],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:24"},"new":["5) Article 9 is replaced by the following","text :","\u201cArticle 9","Reporting and evaluation","1. Each Member State shall report to the","Commission, initially every third year,","with the first report to be presented by 30","June 2012. The frequency of reporting","shall then increase to once every year,","after the first tri-annual report has been","submitted Reports shall outline","monitoring, implementation, effectiveness","and outcome, and in particular shall","provide the best available estimates of:","(a) for each Member State, the proportion","of the silver eel biomass that escapes to","the sea to spawn, or the proportion of the","silver eel biomass leaving the territory of","that Member State as part of a seaward","migration to spawn, relative to the target","level of escapement set out in Article 2(4);","(b) the level of fishing effort that catches","eel each year, and the reduction effected","in accordance with Articles 4(2) and 5(4);","(c) the level of mortality factors outside","the fishery, and the reduction effected in","accordance with Article 2(10);","(d) the amount of eel of less than 12 cm in","length caught and the proportions of this","utilised for different purposes;","(e) the identification, on a voluntary basis,","of the spawning grounds of the eel","caught.","2. The Commission shall present to the","Parliament and the Council, by 31","December 2013 at the latest, a report","consisting of a statistical and scientific","evaluation of the results of the eel","management plans, along with an opinion","from the Scientific, Technical and","Economic Committee for Fisheries. Based","on the findings of that report, the","Commission may bring forward proposals","to broaden the scope of the regulation to","include eel mortality factors other than","fishery.","3. The Commission shall, considering the","report described in paragraph 2, propose","any appropriate measures to achieve with","high probability the recovery of the stock","of European eel, and the Council shall","decide by qualified majority on other","measures enabling attainment of the","escapement target set out in paragraph","2(4) and the reduction in fishing effort","under Article 4(2) and Article 5(4).\u201d"],"old":["5) In Article 9, paragraph 3 is deleted.",""],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"43","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Jens Nilsson","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-44","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 1 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 5 a (new)"],[" Regulation (EC) n\u00ba 1100/2007","Article 9 \u2013 paragraph 1a (new)"]],"meps":[111024],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:24"},"new":["(5a) In article 9, the following paragraph","is inserted:","\"1a. Member States shall collect data","needed for research in order to quantify","the impacts of measures taken on the eel","stock, find mitigation measures and","recommend management targets.","Member States shall make the data","available to the Commission and","designated scientific bodies.\""],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"44","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Carmen Fraga Est\u00e9vez","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-45","justification":"A fixed period of time should always be set for delegated acts.","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 1 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 6"],["Regulation (EC) n\u00ba 1100/2007","Article 12a \u2013 paragraph 2"]],"meps":[1993],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:24"},"new":["2. The delegation of powers referred to in","Article7(6) shall be conferred for a period","of three years starting from\u2026 *. The","Commission shall draw up a report in","respect of the delegation of power not","later than nine months before the end of","the three-year period. The delegation of","power shall be tacitly extended for periods","of an identical duration, unless the","European Parliament or the Council","opposes such extension not later than","three months before the end of each","period.","_____________","*OJ: please insert the date of entry into","force of this Regulation."],"old":["2. The delegation of powers referred to in","Article7(6) shall be conferred for an","indeterminate period of time."],"orig_lang":"es","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"45","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Werner Kuhn","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-46","location":[["Proposal for a regulation","Article 1 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 6 \u2013 subparagraph 2"],["Regulation (EC) n\u00ba 1100/2007","Article 12a \u2013 paragraph 2"]],"meps":[96767],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:24"},"new":["2. The delegation of powers referred to in","Article 7(6) shall be conferred on the","Commission for a period of three years","from the entry into force of the present","regulation."],"old":["2. The delegation of powers referred to in","Article 7(6) shall be conferred for an","indeterminate period of time.","",""],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"46","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Alain Cadec","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-47","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 1 \u2013 paragraph 1 \u2013 point 6 \u2013 subparagraph 2"],[" Regulation (EC) n\u00ba 1100/2007","Article 12a \u2013 paragraph 2"]],"meps":[96849],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:25"},"new":["2. The delegation of powers referred to in","Article7(6) shall be conferred for a period","of three years starting from [OJ: please","insert the date of entry into force of this","regulation]. The Commission shall draw","up a report in respect of the delegation of","power not later than nine months before","the end of the three-year period."],"old":["2. The delegation of powers referred to in","Article7(6) shall be conferred for an","indeterminate period of time."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"47","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":" Jean-Pierre Audy","changes":{},"committee":["PECH"],"date":"2013-04-30T00:00:00","id":"PE510.585-48","location":[[" Proposal for a regulation","Article 2 \u2013 paragraph 1"]],"meps":[33775],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:46:25"},"new":["This Regulation shall enter into force on","the 20th day following that of its","publications in the Official Journal of the","European Union. It shall be consolidated","with the regulation it is amending within","one month of entering into force."],"old":["This Regulation shall enter into force on","the 20th day following that of its","publications in the Official Journal of the","European Union."],"orig_lang":"fr","peid":"PE510.585v01-00","reference":"2012/0201(COD)","seq":"48","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-510.585+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"}],"changes":{"2012-08-15T18:45:24":[{"data":[{"body":"EP","date":"2012-07-26T00:00:00","type":"EP officialisation"},{"body":"EC","commission":[{"Commissioner":"DAMANAKI Maria","DG":{"title":"Maritime Affairs and Fisheries","url":"http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/maritimeaffairs_fisheries/"}}],"date":"2012-07-26T00:00:00","docs":[{"celexid":"CELEX:52012PC0413:EN","title":"COM(2012)0413","type":"Legislative proposal published","url":"http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=413"}],"type":"Legislative proposal"}],"path":["activities"],"type":"added"},{"data":[{"body":"EC","commissioner":"DAMANAKI Maria","dg":{"title":"Maritime Affairs and Fisheries","url":"http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/maritimeaffairs_fisheries/"}}],"path":["other"],"type":"added"},{"data":[{"body":"EP","committee":"PECH","committee_full":"Fisheries","responsible":true}],"path":["committees"],"type":"added"},{"data":{"European Commission":{"title":"PreLex","url":"http://ec.europa.eu/prelex/liste_resultats.cfm?CL=en&ReqId=0&DocType=COD&DocYear=2012&DocNum=0201"},"National parliaments":{"title":"IPEX","url":"http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2012&number=0201&appLng=EN"}},"path":["links"],"type":"added"},{"data":{"instrument":"Regulation","legal_basis":["Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 043-p2"],"reference":"2012/0201(COD)","stage_reached":"Preparatory phase in Parliament","subject":["3.15.01 Fish stocks, conservation of fishery resources","3.15.04 Management of fisheries, fisheries, fishing grounds","3.15.05 Fish catches, import tariff quotas"],"subtype":"Legislation","summary":["Amending Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007"],"title":"Fishery resources: recovery of the European eel stock; aligning the Regulation with the TFEU (Commission delegated and implementing powers)","type":"COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision)"},"path":["procedure"],"type":"added"}],"2012-08-30T21:15:59":[{"data":["
PURPOSE: to align Council Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007\nestablishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European eel\nwith the new rules of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European\nUnion (delegated and implementing acts of the\nCommission).
\nPROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament\nand of the Council.
\nBACKGROUND: the Treaty on the Functioning of the\nEuropean Union (TFEU) makes a distinction between,
\nIn this context Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007 needs to\nbe aligned with the new rules of the TFEU. Powers currently\nconferred upon the Commission by that Regulation should be\nreclassified into delegated and implementing powers.
\nIMPACT ASSESSMENT: it was not necessary to carry out\nan impact assessment.
\nLEGAL BASIS: Article 43(2) of the Treaty on the\nFunctioning of the European Union (TFEU).
\nCONTENT: the main legal action is to identify the\npowers conferred upon the Commission in Council Regulation (EC) No\n1100/2007 and to classify these as delegated or implementing\npowers.
\nBUDGETARY IMPACT: this measure does not involve any\nadditional Union expenditure.
\nPURPOSE: to align Council Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007\nestablishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European eel\nwith the new rules of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European\nUnion (delegated and implementing acts of the\nCommission).
\nPROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament\nand of the Council.
\nBACKGROUND: the Treaty on the Functioning of the\nEuropean Union (TFEU) makes a distinction between,
\nIn this context Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007 needs to\nbe aligned with the new rules of the TFEU. Powers currently\nconferred upon the Commission by that Regulation should be\nreclassified into delegated and implementing powers.
\nIMPACT ASSESSMENT: it was not necessary to carry out\nan impact assessment.
\nLEGAL BASIS: Article 43(2) of the Treaty on the\nFunctioning of the European Union (TFEU).
\nCONTENT: the main legal action is to identify the\npowers conferred upon the Commission in Council Regulation (EC) No\n1100/2007 and to classify these as delegated or implementing\npowers.
\nBUDGETARY IMPACT: this measure does not involve any\nadditional Union expenditure.
\nPURPOSE: to align Council Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007\nestablishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European eel\nwith the new rules of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European\nUnion (delegated and implementing acts of the\nCommission).
\nPROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament\nand of the Council.
\nBACKGROUND: the Treaty on the Functioning of the\nEuropean Union (TFEU) makes a distinction between,
\nIn this context Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007 needs to\nbe aligned with the new rules of the TFEU. Powers currently\nconferred upon the Commission by that Regulation should be\nreclassified into delegated and implementing powers.
\nIMPACT ASSESSMENT: it was not necessary to carry out\nan impact assessment.
\nLEGAL BASIS: Article 43(2) of the Treaty on the\nFunctioning of the European Union (TFEU).
\nCONTENT: the main legal action is to identify the\npowers conferred upon the Commission in Council Regulation (EC) No\n1100/2007 and to classify these as delegated or implementing\npowers.
\nBUDGETARY IMPACT: this measure does not involve any\nadditional Union expenditure.
\nPURPOSE: to align Council Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007\nestablishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European eel\nwith the new rules of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European\nUnion (delegated and implementing acts of the\nCommission).
\nPROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament\nand of the Council.
\nBACKGROUND: the Treaty on the Functioning of the\nEuropean Union (TFEU) makes a distinction between,
\nIn this context Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007 needs to\nbe aligned with the new rules of the TFEU. Powers currently\nconferred upon the Commission by that Regulation should be\nreclassified into delegated and implementing powers.
\nIMPACT ASSESSMENT: it was not necessary to carry out\nan impact assessment.
\nLEGAL BASIS: Article 43(2) of the Treaty on the\nFunctioning of the European Union (TFEU).
\nCONTENT: the main legal action is to identify the\npowers conferred upon the Commission in Council Regulation (EC) No\n1100/2007 and to classify these as delegated or implementing\npowers.
\nBUDGETARY IMPACT: this measure does not involve any\nadditional Union expenditure.
\nPURPOSE: to align Council Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007\nestablishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European eel\nwith the new rules of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European\nUnion (delegated and implementing acts of the\nCommission).
\nPROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament\nand of the Council.
\nBACKGROUND: the Treaty on the Functioning of the\nEuropean Union (TFEU) makes a distinction between,
\nIn this context Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007 needs to\nbe aligned with the new rules of the TFEU. Powers currently\nconferred upon the Commission by that Regulation should be\nreclassified into delegated and implementing powers.
\nIMPACT ASSESSMENT: it was not necessary to carry out\nan impact assessment.
\nLEGAL BASIS: Article 43(2) of the Treaty on the\nFunctioning of the European Union (TFEU).
\nCONTENT: the main legal action is to identify the\npowers conferred upon the Commission in Council Regulation (EC) No\n1100/2007 and to classify these as delegated or implementing\npowers.
\nBUDGETARY IMPACT: this measure does not involve any\nadditional Union expenditure.
\nThe Committee on Fisheries adopted the report by\nIsabella LÖVIN (Greens/EFA, SE) on the proposal for a\nregulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending\nCouncil Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007 establishing measures for the\nrecovery of the stock of European eel.
\nThe committee recommends that the European\nParliaments position at first reading, following the ordinary\nlegislative procedure, should amend the Commissions proposal\nas follows:
\nEel management plan:\nMember States shall identify and define the individual river basins\nlying within their national territory that constitute natural\nhabitats for the European eel (eel river basins), which may include\nmaritime waters. In the Eel Management Plan, each Member State\nshall implement as soon as possible appropriate measures to reduce\nthe mortality of eel caused by factors outside the fishery,\nincluding hydroelectric turbines and pumps. Further measures shall\nbe taken where necessary to reduce mortality caused by other\nfactors in order to meet the targets of the Plan.
\nStarting on 1 January 2014, all Eel Management Plans shall be revised and\nupdated every two years, taking into consideration the latest\nscientific advice.
\nRestocking: the\nCommission shall, not later than 31 October 2013, report to\nthe European Parliament and the Council and evaluate the measures\nconcerning restocking, taking into account the latest scientific\nadvice on the conditions in which restocking is likely to\ncontribute to an increase of the spawning stock biomass. In such\nreport, the Commission shall review the evolution of market\nprices.
\nAmendments stipulate that restocking shall be deemed\nto be a conservation measure provided that:
\nReporting and evaluation: Member States shall collect research data in order\nto quantify the impact of measures taken on the eel stock, find\nmitigation measures and recommend management targets.
\nThe Commission shall present to the Parliament and the\nCouncil, by 31 October 2013, a report consisting of a\nstatistical and scientific evaluation of the results of the\nimplementation of the eel management plans, along with an opinion\nfrom the STECF. Based on the findings of that report, the\nCommission may submit proposals to broaden the scope of the\nRegulation to include eel mortality factors other than\nfishery.
\nThe Commission shall, no later than 31 December\n2013, present an evaluation of Union and international trade in\nEuropean eels and an estimation of illegal trade in European eels\nin Member States. Such report shall identify inconsistencies in the\ndifferent data sets available and suggest measures to improve\nmonitoring of trade, including a modification of the existing\ncustom codes to allow for more effective monitoring.
\nTaking into consideration the findings in the reports\nand as well as any new and more comprehensive advice provided by\nICES on the status of the European eel stock in 2013, the\nCommission shall, no later than 31 March 2014, present a new\nlegislative proposal to the Parliament and to the Council aimed\nat achieving, with high probability, the recovery of the stock of\nEuropean eel.
\nDelegated acts: Members\npropose limiting the delegation of powers conferred on the\nCommission to three years (renewable) from the date of the entry\ninto force of the Regulation and obliges the Commission to report\non its exercise in order to have a regular evaluation and\nquestioning of the use of the delegation.
\nMoreover, the report states that it is of particular\nimportance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations\nduring its preparatory work, especially at expert level, in order\nto obtain objective, rigorous, complete and up-to-date\ninformation.
\nThe Committee on Fisheries adopted the report by\nIsabella LÖVIN (Greens/EFA, SE) on the proposal for a\nregulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending\nCouncil Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007 establishing measures for the\nrecovery of the stock of European eel.
\nThe committee recommends that the European\nParliaments position at first reading, following the ordinary\nlegislative procedure, should amend the Commissions proposal\nas follows:
\nEel management plan:\nMember States shall identify and define the individual river basins\nlying within their national territory that constitute natural\nhabitats for the European eel (eel river basins), which may include\nmaritime waters. In the Eel Management Plan, each Member State\nshall implement as soon as possible appropriate measures to reduce\nthe mortality of eel caused by factors outside the fishery,\nincluding hydroelectric turbines and pumps. Further measures shall\nbe taken where necessary to reduce mortality caused by other\nfactors in order to meet the targets of the Plan.
\nStarting on 1 January 2014, all Eel Management Plans shall be revised and\nupdated every two years, taking into consideration the latest\nscientific advice.
\nRestocking: the\nCommission shall, not later than 31 October 2013, report to\nthe European Parliament and the Council and evaluate the measures\nconcerning restocking, taking into account the latest scientific\nadvice on the conditions in which restocking is likely to\ncontribute to an increase of the spawning stock biomass. In such\nreport, the Commission shall review the evolution of market\nprices.
\nAmendments stipulate that restocking shall be deemed\nto be a conservation measure provided that:
\nReporting and evaluation: Member States shall collect research data in order\nto quantify the impact of measures taken on the eel stock, find\nmitigation measures and recommend management targets.
\nThe Commission shall present to the Parliament and the\nCouncil, by 31 October 2013, a report consisting of a\nstatistical and scientific evaluation of the results of the\nimplementation of the eel management plans, along with an opinion\nfrom the STECF. Based on the findings of that report, the\nCommission may submit proposals to broaden the scope of the\nRegulation to include eel mortality factors other than\nfishery.
\nThe Commission shall, no later than 31 December\n2013, present an evaluation of Union and international trade in\nEuropean eels and an estimation of illegal trade in European eels\nin Member States. Such report shall identify inconsistencies in the\ndifferent data sets available and suggest measures to improve\nmonitoring of trade, including a modification of the existing\ncustom codes to allow for more effective monitoring.
\nTaking into consideration the findings in the reports\nand as well as any new and more comprehensive advice provided by\nICES on the status of the European eel stock in 2013, the\nCommission shall, no later than 31 March 2014, present a new\nlegislative proposal to the Parliament and to the Council aimed\nat achieving, with high probability, the recovery of the stock of\nEuropean eel.
\nDelegated acts: Members\npropose limiting the delegation of powers conferred on the\nCommission to three years (renewable) from the date of the entry\ninto force of the Regulation and obliges the Commission to report\non its exercise in order to have a regular evaluation and\nquestioning of the use of the delegation.
\nMoreover, the report states that it is of particular\nimportance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations\nduring its preparatory work, especially at expert level, in order\nto obtain objective, rigorous, complete and up-to-date\ninformation.
\nThe Committee on Fisheries adopted the report by\nIsabella LÖVIN (Greens/EFA, SE) on the proposal for a\nregulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending\nCouncil Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007 establishing measures for the\nrecovery of the stock of European eel.
\nThe committee recommends that the European\nParliaments position at first reading, following the ordinary\nlegislative procedure, should amend the Commissions proposal\nas follows:
\nEel management plan:\nMember States shall identify and define the individual river basins\nlying within their national territory that constitute natural\nhabitats for the European eel (eel river basins), which may include\nmaritime waters. In the Eel Management Plan, each Member State\nshall implement as soon as possible appropriate measures to reduce\nthe mortality of eel caused by factors outside the fishery,\nincluding hydroelectric turbines and pumps. Further measures shall\nbe taken where necessary to reduce mortality caused by other\nfactors in order to meet the targets of the Plan.
\nStarting on 1 January 2014, all Eel Management Plans shall be revised and\nupdated every two years, taking into consideration the latest\nscientific advice.
\nRestocking: the\nCommission shall, not later than 31 October 2013, report to\nthe European Parliament and the Council and evaluate the measures\nconcerning restocking, taking into account the latest scientific\nadvice on the conditions in which restocking is likely to\ncontribute to an increase of the spawning stock biomass. In such\nreport, the Commission shall review the evolution of market\nprices.
\nAmendments stipulate that restocking shall be deemed\nto be a conservation measure provided that:
\nReporting and evaluation: Member States shall collect research data in order\nto quantify the impact of measures taken on the eel stock, find\nmitigation measures and recommend management targets.
\nThe Commission shall present to the Parliament and the\nCouncil, by 31 October 2013, a report consisting of a\nstatistical and scientific evaluation of the results of the\nimplementation of the eel management plans, along with an opinion\nfrom the STECF. Based on the findings of that report, the\nCommission may submit proposals to broaden the scope of the\nRegulation to include eel mortality factors other than\nfishery.
\nThe Commission shall, no later than 31 December\n2013, present an evaluation of Union and international trade in\nEuropean eels and an estimation of illegal trade in European eels\nin Member States. Such report shall identify inconsistencies in the\ndifferent data sets available and suggest measures to improve\nmonitoring of trade, including a modification of the existing\ncustom codes to allow for more effective monitoring.
\nTaking into consideration the findings in the reports\nand as well as any new and more comprehensive advice provided by\nICES on the status of the European eel stock in 2013, the\nCommission shall, no later than 31 March 2014, present a new\nlegislative proposal to the Parliament and to the Council aimed\nat achieving, with high probability, the recovery of the stock of\nEuropean eel.
\nDelegated acts: Members\npropose limiting the delegation of powers conferred on the\nCommission to three years (renewable) from the date of the entry\ninto force of the Regulation and obliges the Commission to report\non its exercise in order to have a regular evaluation and\nquestioning of the use of the delegation.
\nMoreover, the report states that it is of particular\nimportance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations\nduring its preparatory work, especially at expert level, in order\nto obtain objective, rigorous, complete and up-to-date\ninformation.
\nThe European Parliament adopted by 427 votes to 249,\nwith 25 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a\nregulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending\nCouncil Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007 establishing measures for the\nrecovery of the stock of European eel.
\nThe European Parliaments position at first\nreading, following the ordinary legislative procedure, amends the\nCommissions proposal as follows:
\nEel management plan: in\nthe Eel Management Plan, each Member State shall implement as soon\nas possible appropriate measures to reduce the mortality of\neel caused by factors outside the fishery, including\nhydroelectric turbines and pumps. Further measures shall be taken\nwhere necessary to reduce mortality caused by other factors in\norder to meet the targets of the Plan.
\nStarting on 1 January 2014, all Eel Management Plans shall be revised and\nupdated every two years, taking into consideration the latest\nscientific advice.
\nRestocking: the\nCommission shall, not later than 31 October 2013, report to\nthe European Parliament and the Council and evaluate the measures\nconcerning restocking, taking into account the latest scientific\nadvice on the conditions in which restocking is likely to\ncontribute to an increase of the spawning stock biomass. In such\nreport, the Commission shall review the evolution of market\nprices.
\nAmendments stipulate that restocking shall be deemed\nto be a conservation measure provided that:
\nReporting and evaluation: Member States shall collect research data in order\nto quantify the impact of measures taken on the eel stock, find\nmitigation measures and recommend management targets. They shall\nreport to the Commission initially every third year and shall make\nthe information available to designated scientific bodies.\nThereafter, the frequency of reporting shall increase to once\nevery two years, after the first tri-annual report has been\nsubmitted.
\nThe Commission shall present:
\nFollow-up measures:\ntaking into consideration the findings in the reports and as well\nas any new and more comprehensive advice provided by ICES on the\nstatus of the European eel stock in 2013, the Commission shall,\nno later than 31 March 2014, present a new legislative\nproposal to the Parliament and to the Council aimed at\nachieving, with high probability, the recovery of the stock of\nEuropean eel.
\nPenalties: Parliament\nconsiders it important that the Commission penalise Member States\nwhich have not forwarded or analysed all the data available to them\nin order to enable an exhaustive and scientifically sound inventory\nof the situation regarding European eel to be drawn up.
\nDelegated acts:\nParliament proposes limiting the delegation of powers conferred on\nthe Commission to three years (renewable) from the date of\nthe entry into force of the Regulation and obliges the Commission\nto report on its exercise in order to have a regular evaluation and\nquestioning of the use of the delegation.
\nMoreover, the Commission should carry out appropriate\nconsultations during its preparatory work, especially at expert\nlevel, in order to obtain objective, rigorous, complete and\nup-to-date information.
\nThe European Parliament adopted by 427 votes to 249,\nwith 25 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a\nregulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending\nCouncil Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007 establishing measures for the\nrecovery of the stock of European eel.
\nThe European Parliaments position at first\nreading, following the ordinary legislative procedure, amends the\nCommissions proposal as follows:
\nEel management plan: in\nthe Eel Management Plan, each Member State shall implement as soon\nas possible appropriate measures to reduce the mortality of\neel caused by factors outside the fishery, including\nhydroelectric turbines and pumps. Further measures shall be taken\nwhere necessary to reduce mortality caused by other factors in\norder to meet the targets of the Plan.
\nStarting on 1 January 2014, all Eel Management Plans shall be revised and\nupdated every two years, taking into consideration the latest\nscientific advice.
\nRestocking: the\nCommission shall, not later than 31 October 2013, report to\nthe European Parliament and the Council and evaluate the measures\nconcerning restocking, taking into account the latest scientific\nadvice on the conditions in which restocking is likely to\ncontribute to an increase of the spawning stock biomass. In such\nreport, the Commission shall review the evolution of market\nprices.
\nAmendments stipulate that restocking shall be deemed\nto be a conservation measure provided that:
\nReporting and evaluation: Member States shall collect research data in order\nto quantify the impact of measures taken on the eel stock, find\nmitigation measures and recommend management targets. They shall\nreport to the Commission initially every third year and shall make\nthe information available to designated scientific bodies.\nThereafter, the frequency of reporting shall increase to once\nevery two years, after the first tri-annual report has been\nsubmitted.
\nThe Commission shall present:
\nFollow-up measures:\ntaking into consideration the findings in the reports and as well\nas any new and more comprehensive advice provided by ICES on the\nstatus of the European eel stock in 2013, the Commission shall,\nno later than 31 March 2014, present a new legislative\nproposal to the Parliament and to the Council aimed at\nachieving, with high probability, the recovery of the stock of\nEuropean eel.
\nPenalties: Parliament\nconsiders it important that the Commission penalise Member States\nwhich have not forwarded or analysed all the data available to them\nin order to enable an exhaustive and scientifically sound inventory\nof the situation regarding European eel to be drawn up.
\nDelegated acts:\nParliament proposes limiting the delegation of powers conferred on\nthe Commission to three years (renewable) from the date of\nthe entry into force of the Regulation and obliges the Commission\nto report on its exercise in order to have a regular evaluation and\nquestioning of the use of the delegation.
\nMoreover, the Commission should carry out appropriate\nconsultations during its preparatory work, especially at expert\nlevel, in order to obtain objective, rigorous, complete and\nup-to-date information.
\nPURPOSE: to align Council Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007\nestablishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European eel\nwith the new rules of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European\nUnion (delegated and implementing acts of the\nCommission).
\nPROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament\nand of the Council.
\nBACKGROUND: the Treaty on the Functioning of the\nEuropean Union (TFEU) makes a distinction between,
\nIn this context Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007 needs to\nbe aligned with the new rules of the TFEU. Powers currently\nconferred upon the Commission by that Regulation should be\nreclassified into delegated and implementing powers.
\nIMPACT ASSESSMENT: it was not necessary to carry out\nan impact assessment.
\nLEGAL BASIS: Article 43(2) of the Treaty on the\nFunctioning of the European Union (TFEU).
\nCONTENT: the main legal action is to identify the\npowers conferred upon the Commission in Council Regulation (EC) No\n1100/2007 and to classify these as delegated or implementing\npowers.
\nBUDGETARY IMPACT: this measure does not involve any\nadditional Union expenditure.
\nThe European Parliament adopted by 427 votes to 249,\nwith 25 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a\nregulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending\nCouncil Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007 establishing measures for the\nrecovery of the stock of European eel.
\nThe European Parliaments position at first\nreading, following the ordinary legislative procedure, amends the\nCommissions proposal as follows:
\nEel management plan: in\nthe Eel Management Plan, each Member State shall implement as soon\nas possible appropriate measures to reduce the mortality of\neel caused by factors outside the fishery, including\nhydroelectric turbines and pumps. Further measures shall be taken\nwhere necessary to reduce mortality caused by other factors in\norder to meet the targets of the Plan.
\nStarting on 1 January 2014, all Eel Management Plans shall be revised and\nupdated every two years, taking into consideration the latest\nscientific advice.
\nRestocking: the\nCommission shall, not later than 31 October 2013, report to\nthe European Parliament and the Council and evaluate the measures\nconcerning restocking, taking into account the latest scientific\nadvice on the conditions in which restocking is likely to\ncontribute to an increase of the spawning stock biomass. In such\nreport, the Commission shall review the evolution of market\nprices.
\nAmendments stipulate that restocking shall be deemed\nto be a conservation measure provided that:
\nReporting and evaluation: Member States shall collect research data in order\nto quantify the impact of measures taken on the eel stock, find\nmitigation measures and recommend management targets. They shall\nreport to the Commission initially every third year and shall make\nthe information available to designated scientific bodies.\nThereafter, the frequency of reporting shall increase to once\nevery two years, after the first tri-annual report has been\nsubmitted.
\nThe Commission shall present:
\nFollow-up measures:\ntaking into consideration the findings in the reports and as well\nas any new and more comprehensive advice provided by ICES on the\nstatus of the European eel stock in 2013, the Commission shall,\nno later than 31 March 2014, present a new legislative\nproposal to the Parliament and to the Council aimed at\nachieving, with high probability, the recovery of the stock of\nEuropean eel.
\nPenalties: Parliament\nconsiders it important that the Commission penalise Member States\nwhich have not forwarded or analysed all the data available to them\nin order to enable an exhaustive and scientifically sound inventory\nof the situation regarding European eel to be drawn up.
\nDelegated acts:\nParliament proposes limiting the delegation of powers conferred on\nthe Commission to three years (renewable) from the date of\nthe entry into force of the Regulation and obliges the Commission\nto report on its exercise in order to have a regular evaluation and\nquestioning of the use of the delegation.
\nMoreover, the Commission should carry out appropriate\nconsultations during its preparatory work, especially at expert\nlevel, in order to obtain objective, rigorous, complete and\nup-to-date information.
\nPURPOSE: to align Council Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007\nestablishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European eel\nwith the new rules of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European\nUnion (delegated and implementing acts of the\nCommission).
\nPROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament\nand of the Council.
\nBACKGROUND: the Treaty on the Functioning of the\nEuropean Union (TFEU) makes a distinction between,
\nIn this context Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007 needs to\nbe aligned with the new rules of the TFEU. Powers currently\nconferred upon the Commission by that Regulation should be\nreclassified into delegated and implementing powers.
\nIMPACT ASSESSMENT: it was not necessary to carry out\nan impact assessment.
\nLEGAL BASIS: Article 43(2) of the Treaty on the\nFunctioning of the European Union (TFEU).
\nCONTENT: the main legal action is to identify the\npowers conferred upon the Commission in Council Regulation (EC) No\n1100/2007 and to classify these as delegated or implementing\npowers.
\nBUDGETARY IMPACT: this measure does not involve any\nadditional Union expenditure.
\nPURPOSE: to align Council Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007\nestablishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European eel\nwith the new rules of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European\nUnion (delegated and implementing acts of the\nCommission).
\nPROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament\nand of the Council.
\nBACKGROUND: the Treaty on the Functioning of the\nEuropean Union (TFEU) makes a distinction between,
\nIn this context Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007 needs to\nbe aligned with the new rules of the TFEU. Powers currently\nconferred upon the Commission by that Regulation should be\nreclassified into delegated and implementing powers.
\nIMPACT ASSESSMENT: it was not necessary to carry out\nan impact assessment.
\nLEGAL BASIS: Article 43(2) of the Treaty on the\nFunctioning of the European Union (TFEU).
\nCONTENT: the main legal action is to identify the\npowers conferred upon the Commission in Council Regulation (EC) No\n1100/2007 and to classify these as delegated or implementing\npowers.
\nBUDGETARY IMPACT: this measure does not involve any\nadditional Union expenditure.
\nThe Committee on Fisheries adopted the report by\nIsabella LÖVIN (Greens/EFA, SE) on the proposal for a\nregulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending\nCouncil Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007 establishing measures for the\nrecovery of the stock of European eel.
\nThe committee recommends that the European\nParliaments position at first reading, following the ordinary\nlegislative procedure, should amend the Commissions proposal\nas follows:
\nEel management plan:\nMember States shall identify and define the individual river basins\nlying within their national territory that constitute natural\nhabitats for the European eel (eel river basins), which may include\nmaritime waters. In the Eel Management Plan, each Member State\nshall implement as soon as possible appropriate measures to reduce\nthe mortality of eel caused by factors outside the fishery,\nincluding hydroelectric turbines and pumps. Further measures shall\nbe taken where necessary to reduce mortality caused by other\nfactors in order to meet the targets of the Plan.
\nStarting on 1 January 2014, all Eel Management Plans shall be revised and\nupdated every two years, taking into consideration the latest\nscientific advice.
\nRestocking: the\nCommission shall, not later than 31 October 2013, report to\nthe European Parliament and the Council and evaluate the measures\nconcerning restocking, taking into account the latest scientific\nadvice on the conditions in which restocking is likely to\ncontribute to an increase of the spawning stock biomass. In such\nreport, the Commission shall review the evolution of market\nprices.
\nAmendments stipulate that restocking shall be deemed\nto be a conservation measure provided that:
\nReporting and evaluation: Member States shall collect research data in order\nto quantify the impact of measures taken on the eel stock, find\nmitigation measures and recommend management targets.
\nThe Commission shall present to the Parliament and the\nCouncil, by 31 October 2013, a report consisting of a\nstatistical and scientific evaluation of the results of the\nimplementation of the eel management plans, along with an opinion\nfrom the STECF. Based on the findings of that report, the\nCommission may submit proposals to broaden the scope of the\nRegulation to include eel mortality factors other than\nfishery.
\nThe Commission shall, no later than 31 December\n2013, present an evaluation of Union and international trade in\nEuropean eels and an estimation of illegal trade in European eels\nin Member States. Such report shall identify inconsistencies in the\ndifferent data sets available and suggest measures to improve\nmonitoring of trade, including a modification of the existing\ncustom codes to allow for more effective monitoring.
\nTaking into consideration the findings in the reports\nand as well as any new and more comprehensive advice provided by\nICES on the status of the European eel stock in 2013, the\nCommission shall, no later than 31 March 2014, present a new\nlegislative proposal to the Parliament and to the Council aimed\nat achieving, with high probability, the recovery of the stock of\nEuropean eel.
\nDelegated acts: Members\npropose limiting the delegation of powers conferred on the\nCommission to three years (renewable) from the date of the entry\ninto force of the Regulation and obliges the Commission to report\non its exercise in order to have a regular evaluation and\nquestioning of the use of the delegation.
\nMoreover, the report states that it is of particular\nimportance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations\nduring its preparatory work, especially at expert level, in order\nto obtain objective, rigorous, complete and up-to-date\ninformation.
\nThe European Parliament adopted by 427 votes to 249,\nwith 25 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a\nregulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending\nCouncil Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007 establishing measures for the\nrecovery of the stock of European eel.
\nThe European Parliaments position at first\nreading, following the ordinary legislative procedure, amends the\nCommissions proposal as follows:
\nEel management plan: in\nthe Eel Management Plan, each Member State shall implement as soon\nas possible appropriate measures to reduce the mortality of\neel caused by factors outside the fishery, including\nhydroelectric turbines and pumps. Further measures shall be taken\nwhere necessary to reduce mortality caused by other factors in\norder to meet the targets of the Plan.
\nStarting on 1 January 2014, all Eel Management Plans shall be revised and\nupdated every two years, taking into consideration the latest\nscientific advice.
\nRestocking: the\nCommission shall, not later than 31 October 2013, report to\nthe European Parliament and the Council and evaluate the measures\nconcerning restocking, taking into account the latest scientific\nadvice on the conditions in which restocking is likely to\ncontribute to an increase of the spawning stock biomass. In such\nreport, the Commission shall review the evolution of market\nprices.
\nAmendments stipulate that restocking shall be deemed\nto be a conservation measure provided that:
\nReporting and evaluation: Member States shall collect research data in order\nto quantify the impact of measures taken on the eel stock, find\nmitigation measures and recommend management targets. They shall\nreport to the Commission initially every third year and shall make\nthe information available to designated scientific bodies.\nThereafter, the frequency of reporting shall increase to once\nevery two years, after the first tri-annual report has been\nsubmitted.
\nThe Commission shall present:
\nFollow-up measures:\ntaking into consideration the findings in the reports and as well\nas any new and more comprehensive advice provided by ICES on the\nstatus of the European eel stock in 2013, the Commission shall,\nno later than 31 March 2014, present a new legislative\nproposal to the Parliament and to the Council aimed at\nachieving, with high probability, the recovery of the stock of\nEuropean eel.
\nPenalties: Parliament\nconsiders it important that the Commission penalise Member States\nwhich have not forwarded or analysed all the data available to them\nin order to enable an exhaustive and scientifically sound inventory\nof the situation regarding European eel to be drawn up.
\nDelegated acts:\nParliament proposes limiting the delegation of powers conferred on\nthe Commission to three years (renewable) from the date of\nthe entry into force of the Regulation and obliges the Commission\nto report on its exercise in order to have a regular evaluation and\nquestioning of the use of the delegation.
\nMoreover, the Commission should carry out appropriate\nconsultations during its preparatory work, especially at expert\nlevel, in order to obtain objective, rigorous, complete and\nup-to-date information.
\n