Next event: Results of vote in Parliament 2014/02/25 more...
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading 2014/02/25
- End of procedure in Parliament 2014/02/25
- Debate in Parliament 2014/02/24
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading 2013/12/04
- Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading 2013/11/26
- Committee opinion 2013/11/25
- Committee opinion 2013/11/25
- Committee opinion 2013/10/11
- Amendments tabled in committee 2013/10/01
- Committee opinion 2013/09/26
- Committee opinion 2013/09/24
- Committee opinion 2013/09/23
- Committee opinion 2013/09/10
- Committee opinion 2013/09/06
- Committee draft report 2013/07/22
Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | JURI | SZÁJER József ( PPE) | RAPKAY Bernhard ( S&D), THEIN Alexandra ( ALDE), LICHTENBERGER Eva ( Verts/ALE), KARIM Sajjad ( ECR), MAŠTÁLKA Jiří ( GUE/NGL), SPERONI Francesco Enrico ( EFD), STOYANOV Dimitar ( NA) |
Committee Opinion | AFCO | ||
Committee Opinion | DEVE | MITCHELL Gay ( PPE) | |
Committee Opinion | PECH | SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO Antolín ( S&D) | Alain CADEC ( PPE) |
Committee Opinion | AGRI | DE CASTRO Paolo ( S&D) | |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | GROOTE Matthias ( S&D) | |
Committee Opinion | TRAN | KUHN Werner ( PPE), EL KHADRAOUI Saïd ( S&D) | Gesine MEISSNER ( ALDE) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | SARTORI Amalia ( PPE) | Sajjad KARIM ( ECR), Claude TURMES ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | ECON | BOWLES Sharon ( ALDE) | Nikolaos CHOUNTIS ( GUE/NGL), Werner LANGEN ( PPE), Kay SWINBURNE ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | LIBE | BEŇOVÁ Monika ( S&D) | |
Committee Opinion | EMPL | BERÈS Pervenche ( S&D) | Thomas HÄNDEL ( GUE/NGL) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 052
Legal Basis:
RoP 052Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution on follow-up on the delegation of legislative powers and control by Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers.
The Lisbon Treaty introduced the possibility for Parliament and the Council to delegate part of its own powers to the Commission in a legislative act. The delegated power can only consist in supplementing or amending parts of a legislative act considered non-essential by the legislator.
The delineation of delegated and implementing acts , and the correct and most appropriate choice of provisions to be included in the basic act, constitute issues which become an integral part of most negotiations on legislative proposals.
Accordingly, the resolution contained a number of practical proposals to safeguard Parliament’s prerogatives in order to ensure a sufficient level of democratic legitimacy for the delegated acts.
Application criteria : Parliament considers that certain criteria should be followed by Parliament in applying Articles 290 and 291 TFEU. In general, delegated acts should be used where the basic act leaves a considerable margin of discretion to the Commission to supplement the legislative framework laid down in the basic act.
The Commission may only amend legislative acts by means of delegated acts. This includes amendment of annexes, as annexes are an integral part of the legislative act. Annexes are not to be added to or deleted with the aim of triggering or avoiding the use of delegated acts .
The following should be adopted through delegated acts:
· measures leading to a choice of priorities, objectives or expected results, if the legislator decides not to include them in the legislative act itself;
· measures designed to lay down (further) conditions, criteria or requirements to be met;
· additional binding rules of general scope that affect in substance the rights or obligations laid down in the basic act, further defining the Union policy;
· measure that determines the type of information to be provided under the basic act (i.e. the exact content of the information).
The following should be carried out by means of an implementing act:
· measures determining arrangements for the provision of information (i.e. the format);
· elements that do not reflect any further political or policy orientation
An empowerment to determine methods (i.e. ways of doing something in particular in a regular and systematic way) or methodology (i.e. rules to determine the methods) can provide for delegated or implementing acts depending on the content and the context.
Interinstitutional agreement : Members called on the Commission and the Council to enter into negotiation with the Parliament with a view to reaching an agreement on a set of criteria for the application of articles 290 and 291 TFEU listed in the resolution . These negotiations could take place within the framework of a revision of the interinstitutional agreement on Better Law Making, including the criteria set out.
Parliament made the following recommendations:
· the Commission must provide an explicit justification as to why it is proposing a delegated or implementing act in a particular legislative proposal and why it considers its regulatory content to be non-essential;
· to strengthen the position of its rapporteurs in legislative negotiations, greater recourse should be had to the possibility of requesting an opinion from the Committee on Legal Affairs under Rule 37a of the Rules of Procedure;
· all cases previously dealt with under regulatory procedure with scrutiny (RPS) should now be aligned to Article 290 TFEU; this procedure is expected to be finalised before the end of the current legislature;
· in those cases where it has been decided to use implementing acts , the Parliament's negotiating team should carefully assess what kind of control by Member States is needed and whether the advisory or the examination procedure should be used;
· the Commission must not misuse delegated acts in order to reopen discussions on matters agreed at political level in trilogues; the power to adopt delegated acts should preferably be conferred on the Commission only for a limited period of time ;
· to enable the committees to monitor the use of delegated acts and implementing acts, the Commission should improve its transmission of documents related to delegated acts ;
· Parliament should be regularly and in a timely manner associated with the preparatory phase of delegated acts ; the procedure for inviting Parliament's experts to meetings with national experts, if so requested by the responsible Parliamentary committee should be simplified;
· the time between the transmission of final draft implementing acts and their adoption by the Commission is often too short to allow for adequate oversight by Parliament; the Commission, therefore, must fully respect the Parliament's right to scrutinise final draft implementing acts within a period of one month .
Members recommended that, in each committee, permanent rapporteurs be appointed for delegated and implementing acts, guaranteeing coherence within the committee concerned and with other committees.
Lastly, Parliament commented on specific subject-matters:
Agriculture and fisheries : Parliament deplored the fact that the alignment dossiers on essential agricultural and fisheries legislation were blocked by the Council after the failure of negotiations in informal trilogues and Parliament's first reading. Development cooperation : since implementing acts are often based on prior consultations with third parties, Members stressed that earlier notification of and dialogue with Parliament would allow a more effective use of Parliament’s power of scrutiny. Economic and monetary affairs: given the technical expertise and specialist skills of the ESAs, delegated acts should take the form of RTS rather thanordinary delegated acts wherever possible. For certain legislative acts, Members considered that the period for scrutinising may be extended by a further month, given their volume and complexity.
The Committee on Legal Affairs adopted an own-initiative report by József SZÁJER (EPP, HU) on follow-up on the delegation of legislative powers and control by Member States of the Commission's exercise of implementing powers.
The Lisbon Treaty introduced the possibility for Parliament and the Council to delegate part of its own powers to the Commission in a legislative act. The adoption of provisions requiring political decisions that fall within the responsibility of the legislator cannot be delegated. The delegated power can only consist in supplementing or amending parts of a legislative act considered non-essential by the legislator.
The delineation of delegated and implementing acts , and the correct and most appropriate choice of provisions to be included in the basic act, constitute issues which become an integral part of most negotiations on legislative proposals.
That is why the report contained a number of practical proposals to safeguard Parliament’s prerogatives in order to ensure a sufficient level of democratic legitimacy for the delegated acts, taking into account the different positions taken by Parliament, the ‘horizontal approach’ endorsed by the Conference of Presidents and the regular screening exercises conducted by Parliament's services.
Members called on the Commission and the Council to enter into negotiation with the Parliament with a view to reaching an agreement on a set of criteria for the application of articles 290 and 291 TFEU listed in the report. These negotiations could take place within the framework of a revision of the interinstitutional agreement on Better Law Making, including these criteria:
The report made the following recommendations:
the Commission must provide an explicit justification as to why it is proposing a delegated or implementing act in a particular legislative proposal and why it considers its regulatory content to be non-essential; to strengthen the position of its rapporteurs in legislative negotiations, greater recourse should be had to the possibility of requesting an opinion from the Committee on Legal Affairs under Rule 37a of the Rules of Procedure; all cases previously dealt with under regulatory procedure with scrutiny (RPS) should now be aligned to Article 290 TFEU, as RPS measures are also measures of general scope designed to amend non-essential elements of a basic act; this procedure is expected to be finalised before the end of the current legislature; despite the fact that it can be a good solution in certain cases, Members did not support systematically keeping all policy elements in the basic act as this could, in due course, prevent recourse to Article 290 TFEU as a valuable means of rationalisation of the legislative process; in those cases where it has been decided to use implementing acts , the Parliament's negotiating team should carefully assess what kind of control by Member States is needed and whether the advisory or the examination procedure should be used; the Commission must not misuse delegated acts in order to reopen discussions on matters agreed at political level in trilogues; the power to adopt delegated acts should preferably be conferred on the Commission only for a limited period of time ; to enable the committees to monitor the use of delegated acts and implementing acts, the Commission should improve its transmission of documents related to delegated acts in order to ensure at least the same level of information and transparency as for the existing register of implementing acts and to guarantee a simultaneous flow of information to Parliament and to the Council as the legislator; Parliament should be regularly and in a timely manner associated with the preparatory phase of delegated acts ; it should be informed of the planned timetable, the scheduled meetings of expert groups and the content of envisaged delegated acts; in the context of the preparation of delegated acts, the Commission must fully respect the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission, inter alia by simplifying the procedure for inviting Parliament's experts to meetings with national experts, if so requested by the responsible Parliamentary committee; the time between the transmission of final draft implementing acts and their adoption by the Commission is often too short to allow for adequate oversight by Parliament; the Commission, therefore, must fully respect the Parliament's right to scrutinise final draft implementing acts within a period of one month .
Members recommended that, in each committee, permanent rapporteurs be appointed for delegated and implementing acts , guaranteeing coherence within the committee concerned and with other committees.
Finally, the report commented on specific subject-matters:
Agriculture and fisheries : the report d eplored the fact that the alignment dossiers on essential agricultural and fisheries legislation were blocked by the Council after the failure of negotiations in informal trilogues and Parliament's first reading. Development cooperation : since implementing acts are often based on prior consultations with third parties, Members stressed that earlier notification of and dialogue with Parliament would allow a more effective use of Parliament’s power of scrutiny. Economic and monetary affairs : given the technical expertise and specialist skills of the ESAs, delegated acts should take the form of RTS rather than ordinary delegated acts wherever possible. For certain legislative acts, Members considered that the period for scrutinising may be extended by a further month, given their volume and complexity.
Documents
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T7-0127/2014
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A7-0435/2013
- Committee opinion: PE506.206
- Committee opinion: PE508.273
- Committee opinion: PE514.604
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE519.797
- Committee opinion: PE513.045
- Committee opinion: PE510.865
- Committee opinion: PE513.388
- Committee opinion: PE510.583
- Committee opinion: PE513.025
- Committee draft report: PE510.803
- Committee opinion: PE507.927
- Committee opinion: PE507.927
- Committee draft report: PE510.803
- Committee opinion: PE513.025
- Committee opinion: PE510.583
- Committee opinion: PE513.388
- Committee opinion: PE510.865
- Committee opinion: PE513.045
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE519.797
- Committee opinion: PE514.604
- Committee opinion: PE506.206
- Committee opinion: PE508.273
Activities
- Elena BĂSESCU
Plenary Speeches (0)
Amendments | Dossier |
31 |
2012/2323(INI)
2013/05/06
ENVI
8 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Emphasises that the delegation of power is a choice for Parliament as a co- legislator, which it should exercise with care on a case-by-case basis having regard to the need to
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Recalls that it is 'clear from the provisions of Articles 290 and 291 of the Treaty that delegated acts and implementing acts are answering different needs and therefore cannot be substituted by one for another' (Handbook on Delegated Acts/Implementing Acts, DG IPOL, February 2012, page 4);
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Believes that, in the context of any post- Lisbon alignment of a legislative act, those measures previously subject to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny should become delegated rather than implementing acts, unless exceptionally justified; this justification should be evaluated within a reasonable amount of time.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Strongly criticises the Council for systematically trying not only to avoid delegated acts at all costs in new legislation, but even to roll back on the pre-Lisbon alignment by unduly trying to turn measures subject to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny into implementing acts in post-Lisbon alignment acts; calls on the Council to respect the provisions of the Treaty as regards the clearly distinct nature of delegated acts compared to implementing acts;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Considers that choosing not to delegate certain non-essential elements but to keep any changes thereto in the ordinary legislative procedure may be an appropriate solution in some cases that respects the prerogatives of both Council and Parliament, but would not be appropriate in other cases where it would be disproportionate to the nature of the non-essential element to be amended and would thus de facto act as a break on what may well be important adaptations;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Requests the Secretary-General to prepare a study on the outcome of legislative negotiations between Parliament and the Council involving the issue of delegated and implementing acts, with a view to providing advice and best- practice guidelines for rapporteurs and others involved in future negotiations.
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Is of the opinion that
source: PE-510.673
2013/06/06
PECH
9 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Proposes that, in each parliamentary committee, the Chair, one of the Vice- Chairs or a relevant Member should be charged with supporting Members and guaranteeing coherence regarding delegated and implementing acts in coordination with the other committees; points out that the rapporteur for the basic act should automatically become the rapporteur for its follow-up and should report periodically to the committee; also points out that functional organisation will be needed within the secretariats if scrutiny is to be effective, and recommends, further, that an item given over to follow-up of delegated acts be included on committee agendas;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that scrutiny is essential inasmuch as it enables Parliament to lay down predetermined criteria which, if fulfilled, would rule out the possibility that Parliament would object to a delegated act;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Calls on the Commission to make the publication of its acts more transparent, enabling Parliament and European citizens alike to gain access to them; suggests to that end that the Commission create an IT tool with a view to setting up a database in which acts could be recorded in a form lending itself to democratic scrutiny;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Deplores the fact that, in the field of the common fisheries policy, as in other fields in which the codecision procedure was not introduced until the entry into force of the current Treaty and the Regulatory Procedure with Scrutiny was previously not used, the process of aligning pre- Lisbon legislation with the new legal framework comprising legislative, delegated and implementing acts is facing considerable difficulties
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Maintains that the alignment of fisheries policy necessitated by the Treaty of Lisbon must not lead the Commission to assume powers exceeding the bounds of that Treaty; points out that the authorisation granted to the Commission to adopt delegated acts is not meant to be ‘open-ended’, but rather must be limited in time by agreement (as a rule, powers of this kind are delegated for three years);
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Invites the Commission and the Council to engage in further negotiations with the European Parliament in order to find a common understanding on the
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Recalls the importance of the delegation of executive powers to the Commission in certain policy areas in order to avoid micro-management and a heavy and lengthy co-decision procedure;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Stresses that the choice of instrument also has consequences as regards the follow-up control of the delegated power; therefore supports the line taken by the Conference of Presidents to opt for delegated acts in cases where the choice of conferral applying the rules of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union is not evident;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Is of the opinion that the European Parliament and the Council of Ministers lose credibility in the eyes of EU citizens if important policies cannot be introduced because the two institutions cannot agree among themselves on which administrative procedure is to be used.
source: PE-513.175
2013/06/19
TRAN
14 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) (4a) Considers that the correct exercise of Parliament’s scrutiny in relation to delegated acts may be difficult without an adequate follow-up of their preparatory phase and the necessary expertise to assess their content, given the limited time and resources given for their scrutiny at Committee level;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) (4a) Recalls that rule-making in the European Union also takes place below the legislative level, in acts developing and implementing legislative acts and that it is necessary to ensure the correct application of the Treaty to guarantee a sufficient level of democratic legitimacy for these acts as well;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) (4b) Recalls that according to Articles 290 and 291 of the Treaty, delegated acts and implementing acts are answering different needs and therefore cannot be substituted by one for another;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) (4b) Urges the Commission to propose a set of precise interinstutional criteria for the use of delegated and implementing acts, including revision mechanisms, and based on the various stages of decision making that lead these acts;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) (4c) Believes that, in order to strengthen the position of its rapporteurs in legislative negotiations, more recourse should be made to the possibility of requesting an opinion from JURI under Rule 37a of the Rules of Procedure;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 d (new) (4d) Calls on the Commission to ensure that the same level of information and transparency is provided to both national experts and Parliament’s experts;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 e (new) (4e) Considers that the correct exercise of Parliament’s scrutiny in relation to delegated acts may be difficult without an adequate follow-up of their preparatory phase and the necessary expertise to assess their content, given the limited time given for their scrutiny at Committee level;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 f (new) (4f) Underlines the importance of Parliament’s involvement in the preparatory phase of delegated acts both to influence, if possible, their content at an early stage and to be in a good position to scrutinise the content after their transmission, given the limited period given to Parliament for scrutiny;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 g (new) (4g) Insists that, in the context of the post- Lisbon alignment of a legislative act, those measures previously subject to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny should become delegated acts rather than implementing acts, unless exceptionally justified;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concerns about the alignment exercise in the current context of the Council and Commission’s hostility towards the use of delegated acts, since it could lead to Parliament losing its scrutiny rights if measures were to become implementing acts in important and politically sensitive pieces of legislation, like those related to security, where democratic control should, in any case, be adequately guaranteed through Parliament’s scrutiny rights on delegated acts;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) Urges the Commission, as guardian of the Treaties, to fulfil its commitments under Articles 290 and 291 of the Lisbon Treaty and support Parliament in defending its rights of scrutiny;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) (3a) Laments the Commission’s opposition, during the tripartite dialogues on legislative reports currently in progress, to the use of delegated acts, which would provide for scrutiny by Parliament; reminds the Commission of the Joint Declaration on practical arrangements for the codecision procedure, and in this respect requests that during those discussions the Commission perform its role of helping to reconcile the positions of Parliament and the Council;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) (3b) Considers that Parliament must at all times be guaranteed a right of scrutiny over the action the Commission takes by means of delegated acts, without the exercising of that right presenting an obstacle to the EU’s capacity for action and initiative;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) (4a) Emphasises that delegated and implementing acts should be limited to issues of purely technical and/or administrative nature: political topics should be reserved to a democratic and transparent co-decision procedure, accessible to the European citizen;
source: PE-513.391
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-0435&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0435_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0127New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0127_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
JURI/7/11460New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
other/0/dg/title |
Old
Secretariat GeneralNew
Secretariat-General |
activities/0/committees/1/committee |
Old
PECHNew
AGRI |
activities/0/committees/1/committee_full |
Old
FisheriesNew
Agriculture and Rural Development |
activities/0/committees/1/date |
Old
2013-01-17T00:00:00New
2013-03-19T00:00:00 |
activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de188750fb8127435bdc349New
4f1ac782b819f25efd00008f |
activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO AntolínNew
DE CASTRO Paolo |
activities/0/committees/2/committee |
Old
LIBENew
DEVE |
activities/0/committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsNew
Development |
activities/0/committees/2/date |
Old
2013-01-31T00:00:00New
2013-05-08T00:00:00 |
activities/0/committees/2/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
PPE |
activities/0/committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de184b00fb8127435bdbde7New
4f1ad9c5b819f207b3000035 |
activities/0/committees/2/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
FLAŠÍKOVÁ BEŇOVÁ MonikaNew
MITCHELL Gay |
activities/0/committees/3/committee |
Old
JURINew
ECON |
activities/0/committees/3/committee_full |
Old
Legal AffairsNew
Economic and Monetary Affairs |
activities/0/committees/3/date |
Old
2012-12-12T00:00:00New
2013-02-05T00:00:00 |
activities/0/committees/3/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
ALDE |
activities/0/committees/3/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1886f0fb8127435bdc340New
4f1ac688b819f25efd000047 |
activities/0/committees/3/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
SZÁJER JózsefNew
BOWLES Sharon |
activities/0/committees/3/responsible |
Old
TrueNew
|
activities/0/committees/3/shadows |
|
activities/0/committees/4/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de183180fb8127435bdbb94New
4f1ac652b819f25efd000032 |
activities/0/committees/5/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1851c0fb8127435bdbe88New
4f1ac8b9b819f25efd0000ec |
activities/0/committees/6/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
activities/0/committees/6/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de188530fb8127435bdc313New
4f1adb0cb819f207b30000a4 |
activities/0/committees/7/committee |
Old
DEVENew
JURI |
activities/0/committees/7/committee_full |
Old
DevelopmentNew
Legal Affairs |
activities/0/committees/7/date |
Old
2013-05-08T00:00:00New
2012-12-12T00:00:00 |
activities/0/committees/7/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
activities/0/committees/7/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de186e50fb8127435bdc10eNew
4f1adbc1b819f207b30000e1 |
activities/0/committees/7/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
MITCHELL GayNew
SZÁJER József |
activities/0/committees/7/responsible |
Old
New
True |
activities/0/committees/7/shadows |
|
activities/0/committees/8/committee |
Old
AGRINew
LIBE |
activities/0/committees/8/committee_full |
Old
Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentNew
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs |
activities/0/committees/8/date |
Old
2013-03-19T00:00:00New
2013-01-31T00:00:00 |
activities/0/committees/8/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1845e0fb8127435bdbd74New
4f1ac802b819f25efd0000c0 |
activities/0/committees/8/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
DE CASTRO PaoloNew
FLAŠÍKOVÁ BEŇOVÁ Monika |
activities/0/committees/9/committee |
Old
ECONNew
PECH |
activities/0/committees/9/committee_full |
Old
Economic and Monetary AffairsNew
Fisheries |
activities/0/committees/9/date |
Old
2013-02-05T00:00:00New
2013-01-17T00:00:00 |
activities/0/committees/9/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
ALDENew
S&D |
activities/0/committees/9/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de183630fb8127435bdbc04New
4f1adb00b819f207b30000a0 |
activities/0/committees/9/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
BOWLES SharonNew
SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO Antolín |
activities/0/committees/10/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
activities/0/committees/10/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1860d0fb8127435bdbfd4New
4f1ad21db819f27595000007 |
activities/0/committees/10/rapporteur/1/mepref |
Old
4de184760fb8127435bdbd94New
4f1ac7bcb819f25efd0000a7 |
activities/1/committees |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2014-02-25T00:00:00New
2013-11-26T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs |
|
activities/1/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/4/committees |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2013-11-26T00:00:00New
2014-02-25T00:00:00 |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
committees/1/committee |
Old
PECHNew
AGRI |
committees/1/committee_full |
Old
FisheriesNew
Agriculture and Rural Development |
committees/1/date |
Old
2013-01-17T00:00:00New
2013-03-19T00:00:00 |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de188750fb8127435bdc349New
4f1ac782b819f25efd00008f |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO AntolínNew
DE CASTRO Paolo |
committees/2/committee |
Old
LIBENew
DEVE |
committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsNew
Development |
committees/2/date |
Old
2013-01-31T00:00:00New
2013-05-08T00:00:00 |
committees/2/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
S&DNew
PPE |
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de184b00fb8127435bdbde7New
4f1ad9c5b819f207b3000035 |
committees/2/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
FLAŠÍKOVÁ BEŇOVÁ MonikaNew
MITCHELL Gay |
committees/3/committee |
Old
JURINew
ECON |
committees/3/committee_full |
Old
Legal AffairsNew
Economic and Monetary Affairs |
committees/3/date |
Old
2012-12-12T00:00:00New
2013-02-05T00:00:00 |
committees/3/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
ALDE |
committees/3/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1886f0fb8127435bdc340New
4f1ac688b819f25efd000047 |
committees/3/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
SZÁJER JózsefNew
BOWLES Sharon |
committees/3/responsible |
Old
TrueNew
|
committees/3/shadows |
|
committees/4/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de183180fb8127435bdbb94New
4f1ac652b819f25efd000032 |
committees/5/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1851c0fb8127435bdbe88New
4f1ac8b9b819f25efd0000ec |
committees/6/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/6/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de188530fb8127435bdc313New
4f1adb0cb819f207b30000a4 |
committees/7/committee |
Old
DEVENew
JURI |
committees/7/committee_full |
Old
DevelopmentNew
Legal Affairs |
committees/7/date |
Old
2013-05-08T00:00:00New
2012-12-12T00:00:00 |
committees/7/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/7/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de186e50fb8127435bdc10eNew
4f1adbc1b819f207b30000e1 |
committees/7/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
MITCHELL GayNew
SZÁJER József |
committees/7/responsible |
Old
New
True |
committees/7/shadows |
|
committees/8/committee |
Old
AGRINew
LIBE |
committees/8/committee_full |
Old
Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentNew
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs |
committees/8/date |
Old
2013-03-19T00:00:00New
2013-01-31T00:00:00 |
committees/8/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1845e0fb8127435bdbd74New
4f1ac802b819f25efd0000c0 |
committees/8/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
DE CASTRO PaoloNew
FLAŠÍKOVÁ BEŇOVÁ Monika |
committees/9/committee |
Old
ECONNew
PECH |
committees/9/committee_full |
Old
Economic and Monetary AffairsNew
Fisheries |
committees/9/date |
Old
2013-02-05T00:00:00New
2013-01-17T00:00:00 |
committees/9/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
ALDENew
S&D |
committees/9/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de183630fb8127435bdbc04New
4f1adb00b819f207b30000a0 |
committees/9/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
BOWLES SharonNew
SÁNCHEZ PRESEDO Antolín |
committees/10/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/10/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1860d0fb8127435bdbfd4New
4f1ad21db819f27595000007 |
committees/10/rapporteur/1/mepref |
Old
4de184760fb8127435bdbd94New
4f1ac7bcb819f25efd0000a7 |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052 |
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Debate scheduledNew
Debate in Parliament |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/3/type |
Old
Debate in plenary scheduledNew
Debate scheduled |
activities/3/date |
Old
2014-02-27T00:00:00New
2014-02-24T00:00:00 |
activities/4 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2014-02-26T00:00:00New
2014-02-27T00:00:00 |
activities/3/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/3/date |
Old
2014-04-14T00:00:00New
2014-02-26T00:00:00 |
activities/3/date |
Old
2014-02-25T00:00:00New
2014-04-14T00:00:00 |
activities/1 |
|
activities/3/docs/0/text |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2014-02-04T00:00:00New
2014-02-25T00:00:00 |
activities/4/date |
Old
2014-01-14T00:00:00New
2014-02-04T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2013-10-01T00:00:00New
2013-12-04T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/3 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2013-12-09T00:00:00New
2014-01-14T00:00:00 |
activities/0/committees/7/shadows |
|
committees/7/shadows |
|
activities/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE519.797
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2013-11-18T00:00:00New
2013-12-09T00:00:00 |
activities/1/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE510.803
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/0/committees/2/date |
2013-05-08T00:00:00
|
activities/0/committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/date |
2013-05-08T00:00:00
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
activities/0/committees/4/date |
2013-03-13T00:00:00
|
activities/0/committees/4/rapporteur |
|
committees/4/date |
2013-03-13T00:00:00
|
committees/4/rapporteur |
|
procedure/subject/1 |
Old
8.50.01 Implementation of Community lawNew
8.50.01 Implementation of EU law |
activities/0/committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
activities/0/committees/1/date |
2013-03-19T00:00:00
|
activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/date |
2013-03-19T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/0/committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
activities/1/date |
Old
2013-07-01T00:00:00New
2013-11-18T00:00:00 |
activities/1 |
|
activities/0/committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
activities/0/committees/5/date |
2013-01-31T00:00:00
|
activities/0/committees/5/rapporteur |
|
committees/5/date |
2013-01-31T00:00:00
|
committees/5/rapporteur |
|
activities/0/committees/7/date |
|
activities/0/committees/7/rapporteur |
|
committees/7/date |
|
committees/7/rapporteur |
|
activities/0/committees/3/date |
2012-12-17T00:00:00
|
activities/0/committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/3/date |
2012-12-17T00:00:00
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/0 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
JURI/7/11460
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|