BETA

Procedure completed



2013/0023(COD) Protection of the euro and other currencies against counterfeiting by criminal law
Next event: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading 2014/04/16 more...
RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Opinion ECON
Opinion IMCO
Lead LIBE
Lead committee dossier: LIBE/7/11903
Legal Basis TFEU 083-p1-a1

Activites

  • 2014/05/21 Final act published in Official Journal
  • 2014/05/15 Final act signed
  • 2014/05/15 End of procedure in Parliament
  • #3310
  • 2014/05/06 Council Meeting
  • 2014/05/06 Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
  • 2014/04/16 Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    • T7-0441/2014 summary
  • #3298
  • 2014/03/03 Council Meeting
  • 2014/01/10 Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
    • A7-0018/2014 summary
  • 2013/12/17 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • #3260
  • 2013/10/07 Council Meeting
  • 2013/03/12 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • 2013/02/05 Legislative proposal published
    • COM(2013)0042 summary
    • DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/olaf/', 'title': 'European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)'}, ŠEMETA Algirdas

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

activities/1/committees/0/date
2013-03-12T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: ZALBA BIDEGAIN Pablo
activities/1/committees/2/date
2013-01-31T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: ECR name: MCINTYRE Anthea
activities/1/committees/2/shadows
  • group: EPP name: STRIFFLER Michèle
  • group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja
  • group: ALDE name: WIKSTRÖM Cecilia
  • group: Verts/ALE name: TAVARES Rui
  • group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Cornelis
activities/3
date
2013-12-17T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/4/committees/0/date
2013-03-12T00:00:00
activities/4/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: ZALBA BIDEGAIN Pablo
activities/4/committees/2/date
2013-01-31T00:00:00
activities/4/committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: ECR name: MCINTYRE Anthea
activities/4/committees/2/shadows
  • group: EPP name: STRIFFLER Michèle
  • group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja
  • group: ALDE name: WIKSTRÖM Cecilia
  • group: Verts/ALE name: TAVARES Rui
  • group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Cornelis
activities/11/body
EP
activities/11/committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2013-03-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: ZALBA BIDEGAIN Pablo
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: STRIFFLER Michèle group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja group: ALDE name: WIKSTRÖM Cecilia group: Verts/ALE name: TAVARES Rui group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Cornelis responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2013-01-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: MCINTYRE Anthea
activities/11/date
Old
2013-12-17T00:00:00
New
2014-05-21T00:00:00
activities/11/docs
  • url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32014L0062 title: Directive 2014/62
  • url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0062&from=EN title: OJ L 151 21.05.2014, p. 0001
activities/11/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Final act published in Official Journal
committees/0/date
2013-03-12T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: ZALBA BIDEGAIN Pablo
committees/2/date
2013-01-31T00:00:00
committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: ECR name: MCINTYRE Anthea
committees/2/shadows
  • group: EPP name: STRIFFLER Michèle
  • group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja
  • group: ALDE name: WIKSTRÖM Cecilia
  • group: Verts/ALE name: TAVARES Rui
  • group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Cornelis
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
procedure/final
url
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32014L0062
title
Directive 2014/62
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
New
Procedure completed
activities/10
date
2014-05-15T00:00:00
body
EP
type
End of procedure in Parliament
activities/9
date
2014-05-15T00:00:00
body
CSL
type
Final act signed
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting signature of act
New
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
activities/6/docs/0/text
  • The European Parliament adopted by 545 votes to 8, with 21 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of the euro and other currencies against counterfeiting by criminal law, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2000/383/JHA.

    Parliament adopted its position at first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure. The amendments adopted in plenary are the result of an agreement reached between the European Parliament and the Council. They amended the proposal as follows:

    Aim: since its introduction in 2002, as a currency continuously targeted by organised crime groups active in money counterfeiting, counterfeiting of the euro has caused financial damage of at least EUR 500 million. This Directive should establish minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of counterfeiting of the euro and other currencies. It should also introduce common provisions to strengthen the fight against those offences and to improve investigation of them and to ensure better cooperation against counterfeiting.

    Offences: Member States should take the necessary measures to ensure that certain conduct is punishable as a criminal offence, when committed intentionally. These include any fraudulent making, receiving, obtaining or possession of instruments, articles, computer programmes as well as security features, such as holograms, watermarks or other components of currency which serve to protect against counterfeiting. 

    Intentional conduct should also punishable in relation to notes and coins which are not yet issued, but are designated for circulation as legal tender.

    Sanctions for natural persons: Member States should provide for criminal sanctions in their national law in respect of the provisions of Union law on combating currency counterfeiting. Those sanctions should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive and should include imprisonment. The minimum level of the maximum term of imprisonment (five and eight years according to the case) should apply at least to the most serious forms of those offences.

    Although intentionally passing on counterfeit currency which has been received in good faith could be sanctioned with a different type of criminal sanction, including fines, in the national law of the Member States, those national laws should provide for imprisonment as a maximum sanction.

    Transmission of counterfeit euro notes and coins: Member States should ensure that during criminal proceedings the examination by the National Analysis Centre and Coin National Analysis Centre of suspected counterfeit euro notes and coins for analysis, identification and detection of further counterfeits is permitted without delay. The competent authorities should transmit the necessary samples without any delay, and at the latest once a final decision concerning the criminal proceedings has been reached.

    Statistics: Member States should, at least every two years, transmit data to the Commission on the number of offences and the number of persons prosecuted for and convicted of the offences.

    By five years after the entry into force of the Directive, the Commission should submit a report on the application of this Directive. It should be accompanied, if necessary, by a legislative proposal.

activities/7
date
2014-05-06T00:00:00
body
CSL
type
Council Meeting
council
Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN
meeting_id
3310
activities/8
date
2014-05-06T00:00:00
body
EP/CSL
type
Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Provisional agreement between Parliament and Council on final act
New
Awaiting signature of act
activities/6/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0441
activities/6
date
2014-04-16T00:00:00
docs
type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0441/2014
body
EP
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Provisional agreement between Parliament and Council on final act
activities/0
date
2013-02-05T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0042/COM_COM(2013)0042_FR.pdf title: COM(2013)0042 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52013PC0042:EN
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
commission
DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/olaf/ title: European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
activities/0/body
Old
EP
New
EC
activities/0/commission
  • DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/olaf/ title: European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
activities/0/date
Old
2014-04-16T00:00:00
New
2013-02-05T00:00:00
activities/0/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0042/COM_COM(2013)0042_FR.pdf celexid: CELEX:52013PC0042:EN type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(2013)0042
activities/0/type
Old
Vote scheduled
New
Legislative proposal published
activities/6/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Vote scheduled
activities/4/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the report by Anthea McINTYRE (ECR, UK) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of the euro and other currencies against counterfeiting by criminal law, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2000/383/JHA.

    The committee recommended that Parliament’s position in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows:

    Subject matter: the provisions provided under this Directive should also am to ensure better coordination of anti-counterfeiting measures between national authorities within and outside the Eurozone.

    Intentional nature: with regard to the criminal offences provided for in this Directive, intention must be a part of all the elements constituting the offences referred to in this Directive. The intentional nature of an act or omission may be inferred from objective and factual circumstances. Offences by natural persons which do not require intention are not covered by this Directive.

    Penalties: given the substantial disparities between Member States the danger exists that the introduction of minimum penalties for counterfeiting the euro and other currencies might lead to lack of uniformity regarding minimum penalties within one and the same national legal system. Therefore, Member States should provide for minimum levels of maximum penalties.

    The report stated that offences referred to in the Directive should be punishable under national law by a maximum penalty of eight years of imprisonment.

    In enforcing and executing sentences for the criminal offences provided for in this Directive, Member States should apply the general rules and principles of national criminal law in accordance with the specific circumstances of each case.

    Compilation of data: Members proposed that Member States should regularly compile reliable data on the number of incidents concerning counterfeit euro notes and coins with particular reference to criminal prosecutions initiated and successful criminal prosecutions. Such data should be made available to OLAF.

    Obligation to transmit counterfeit euro notes and coins for analysis and detection of counterfeits: immediately after the proceedings have concluded, the judicial authorities should transmit those necessary samples of each type of suspected counterfeit note to the National Analysis Centre and each type of suspected counterfeit coin to the Coin National Analysis Centre.

    European Central Bank report: the European Central Bank, in consultation with the Commission, should, by one year after the entry into force of this Directive, submit a report on the EUR 200 and EUR 500 banknotes. That report should assess the extent to which the issuing of those denominations is justified in the light of the risks of counterfeiting and money laundering. The report should be accompanied, if necessary, by a proposal for a decision.

    Consultations with third countries: the Commission should, on behalf of the Union, consider the negotiation of appropriate agreements with third countries that use the euro as a currency in order to oppose and punish any activity likely to call into question the authenticity of the euro through counterfeiting and in order to attain the objectives of this Directive.

activities/6/date
Old
2014-04-15T00:00:00
New
2014-04-16T00:00:00
activities/6/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/5
date
2014-03-03T00:00:00
body
CSL
type
Council Meeting
council
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA)
meeting_id
3298
other/0
body
CSL
type
Council Meeting
council
Former Council configuration
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0018&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading title: A7-0018/2014
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52013DC0042:EN
New
CELEX:52013PC0042:EN
activities/5/date
Old
2014-03-12T00:00:00
New
2014-04-15T00:00:00
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
Old
CELEX:52013PC0042:EN
New
CELEX:52013DC0042:EN
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
activities/5/date
Old
2014-04-03T00:00:00
New
2014-03-12T00:00:00
activities/0
date
2013-02-05T00:00:00
docs
type
Legislative proposal
body
EC
commission
DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/olaf/ title: European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
activities/0/body
Old
EP
New
EC
activities/0/commission
  • DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/olaf/ title: European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
activities/0/date
Old
2013-06-06T00:00:00
New
2013-02-05T00:00:00
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013PC0042:EN
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: to draw up minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of counterfeiting of the euro and other currencies.

    PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of the euro and other currencies against counterfeiting by criminal law, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2000/383/JHA.

    PARLIAMENT’S ROLE: Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.

    BACKGROUND: the euro continues to be a target of organised crime groups active in the forgery of money. Counterfeiting of the euro has led to a financial damage of at least EUR 500 million since the introduction of the euro in 2002. Europol considers that there is a long-term trend towards an increase in the crime level and notes that the criminal threat remains serious.

    Council Framework Decision 2000/383/JHA on increasing protection by criminal penalties and other sanctions against counterfeiting in connection with the introduction of the euro aims at supplementing, on the territory of European Union, the provisions of the Geneva Convention of 1929 which lays down rules ensuring that severe criminal penalties and other sanctions can be imposed for offences of counterfeiting currency.

    Although all Member States have, with minor exceptions, formally implemented the Framework Decision correctly, Member States have adopted diverging rules and consequently often diverging levels of protection and practices within their national legal systems. In particular, considerable differences exist with respect to the levels of sanctions which are applicable in the Member States to the main forms of counterfeiting. It is therefore essential to ensure that effective and efficient criminal law measures protect the euro and any other currency whose circulation is legally authorised in all Member States.

    IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the Commission conducted an impact assessment of policy alternatives, taking into account the consultations of the interested parties. After considering the possible options, the impact assessment concludes that the following solution would be preferred: (i) maintenance of most of the provisions from Council Framework Decision 2000/383/JHA in a new proposal, with minor modifications, taking into account the Treaty of Lisbon; (ii) modification of the provisions on penalties; and (iii) introduction of a new provision obliging Member States to provide for the possibility to use certain investigative tools.

    LEGAL BASIS: Article 83 (1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

    CONTENT: the purpose of this Directive is to supplement the provisions and to facilitate the application of the Geneva Convention by the Member States. It builds on and updates Council Framework Decision 2000/383/JHA seeking to increase protection by criminal penalties and other sanctions against counterfeiting in connection with the introduction of the euro. The proposal:

    ·        requires Member States to criminalise all forms of preparation and participation. Criminal responsibility for attempt is included for the majority of offences;

    ·        requires Member States to apply effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties in line with jurisprudence of the Court of Justice. For more serious cases of the offences of production and distribution of counterfeit currency, it sets out a sanction of imprisonment within a range of at least six months and eight years for natural persons;

    ·        requires Member States to ensure liability of legal persons, while excluding that such liability is alternative to that of natural persons, and to apply effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions on legal persons;

    ·        requires jurisdiction of the judicial authorities which allow them to initiate investigations, pursue prosecutions and bring to judgment cases relating to currency counterfeiting;

    ·        obliges Member States whose currency is the euro to exercise universal jurisdiction on euro counterfeiting offences under certain conditions;

    ·        ensures that investigative tools which are provided for in national law for organised crime or other serious crime cases can also be used in cases of counterfeiting of currency;

    ·        requires from Member States to ensure that the National Analysis Centres and the National Coin Analysis Centres can analyse euro counterfeits also during on-going judicial proceedings for the purpose of detecting further counterfeits;

    ·        requests that Member States are contracting parties of the International Geneva Convention of 20 April 1929.

    BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no implications for the Budget of the European Union. 

activities/0/docs/0/title
Old
PE510.737
New
COM(2013)0042
activities/0/docs/0/type
Old
Committee draft report
New
Legislative proposal published
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE510.737
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0042/COM_COM(2013)0042_FR.pdf
activities/0/type
Old
Committee draft report
New
Legislative proposal published
activities/2
date
2013-05-23T00:00:00
docs
url: http://eescopinions.eesc.europa.eu/eescopiniondocument.aspx?language=EN&docnr=2896&year=2013 celexid: CELEX:52013AE2896:EN type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report title: CES2896/2013
body
ESOC
type
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
activities/3
date
2013-05-28T00:00:00
docs
body
ECB
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
activities/5
date
2013-07-17T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.694 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE516.694
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/8
date
2014-01-10T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/9/date
Old
2014-03-11T00:00:00
New
2014-04-03T00:00:00
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/7
date
2013-12-17T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013PC0042:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013PC0042:EN
procedure/subject/0
Old
5.20.02 Single currency, euro
New
5.20.02 Single currency, euro, euro area
activities/7/date
Old
2014-04-02T00:00:00
New
2014-03-11T00:00:00
activities/7
date
2014-04-02T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/4/date
Old
2013-07-17T00:00:00
New
2013-06-06T00:00:00
activities/4/docs/0/title
Old
PE516.694
New
PE510.737
activities/4/docs/0/type
Old
Amendments tabled in committee
New
Committee draft report
activities/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.694
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE510.737
activities/4/type
Old
Amendments tabled in committee
New
Committee draft report
activities/5/date
Old
2013-12-10T00:00:00
New
2013-07-17T00:00:00
activities/5/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.694 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE516.694
activities/5/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/6/body
Old
EP
New
CSL
activities/6/council
Justice and Home Affairs (JHA)
activities/6/date
Old
2013-06-06T00:00:00
New
2013-10-07T00:00:00
activities/6/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE510.737 type: Committee draft report title: PE510.737
activities/6/meeting_id
3260
activities/6/type
Old
Committee draft report
New
Council Meeting
activities/2/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013AE2896:EN
activities/3/docs/1/text
  • Opinion of the European Central Bank on a proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of the euro and other currencies against counterfeiting by criminal law, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2000/383/JHA.

    The ECB welcomes the proposed directive, as well as the fact that the proposed directive takes into account the ECB’s view that the criminal law framework should be reinforced by strengthening and harmonising the penalty regime, including by setting standards for minimum penalties.

    From a general perspective, the ECB:

    • suggests, in the interests of clarity, inserting the content of Article 9a of Council Framework Decision 2000/383/JHA into the proposed directive;
    • considers it would be beneficial to invite the competent authorities of Denmark, the United Kingdom and Ireland (if the latter two do not participate in the adoption of the proposed directive), to commit to apply the minimum and maximum standards for penalties, ensure the availability of effective investigative tools and the transmission of counterfeit notes and coins to National Analysis Centres (NACs) and the National Coin Analysis Centres (CNACs) by judicial authorities in accordance with the proposed directive.

    The ECB’s specific observations relate to the following points:

    - Potential nominal value of counterfeit notes and coins: the ECB considers that recital 19 of the proposal should be amended: (i) to allow for the possibility for Member States to apply a proportionate penalty in relation to unfinished counterfeited notes and coins, which may only have a potential nominal value; and (ii) to provide that the minimum and maximum standards for penalties would take into account the relevant nominal or potential nominal value of non-euro counterfeit notes and coins.

    - Counterfeit offences in relation to production tools and raw materials of banknotes and coins: with a view to significantly increasing the efficiency and deterrent effect of the penalties, the ECB considers that the minimum and maximum standards for penalties should apply to all offences defined in Article 3(1) of the proposed directive.

    In this respect, given that the most sophisticated counterfeit notes and coins are produced using components from multiple sources, for example fraudulent holograms from non-Union countries, the ECB would support the inclusion of offences under Article 3(1)(d) of the proposed directive, where they involve particularly serious circumstances, within the scope of the penalty regime envisaged in the proposed directive.

    - Obligation to transmit counterfeit notes and coins for analysis: the ECB recommends that where samples of suspected counterfeit notes and coins cannot be transmitted because it is necessary to retain them as evidence, these samples of counterfeit notes and coins should be transmitted to the NAC or CNAC without delay after the relevant proceedings have concluded.

activities/5/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.694
activities/3
date
2013-05-28T00:00:00
docs
body
ECB
type
European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report
activities/4
date
2013-07-17T00:00:00
docs
type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE516.694
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities/1/committees/2/shadows
  • group: EPP name: STRIFFLER Michèle
  • group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja
  • group: ALDE name: WIKSTRÖM Cecilia
  • group: Verts/ALE name: TAVARES Rui
  • group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Cornelis
committees/2/shadows
  • group: EPP name: STRIFFLER Michèle
  • group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja
  • group: ALDE name: WIKSTRÖM Cecilia
  • group: Verts/ALE name: TAVARES Rui
  • group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Cornelis
activities/1/committees/0/date
2013-03-12T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: ZALBA BIDEGAIN Pablo
committees/0/date
2013-03-12T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: ZALBA BIDEGAIN Pablo
activities/3/date
Old
2013-06-04T00:00:00
New
2013-06-06T00:00:00
activities/3/date
Old
2013-05-14T00:00:00
New
2013-06-04T00:00:00
activities/3
date
2013-05-23T00:00:00
docs
url: http://eescopinions.eesc.europa.eu/eescopiniondocument.aspx?language=EN&docnr=2896&year=2013 type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report title: CES2896/2013
body
ESOC
type
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
activities/3
date
2013-12-10T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/2/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE510.737
activities/2
date
2013-05-14T00:00:00
docs
type: Committee draft report title: PE510.737
body
EP
type
Committee draft report
activities/1
date
2013-03-12T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
LIBE/7/11903
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: to draw up minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of counterfeiting of the euro and other currencies.

    PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of the euro and other currencies against counterfeiting by criminal law, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2000/383/JHA.

    PARLIAMENT’S ROLE: Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.

    BACKGROUND: the euro continues to be a target of organised crime groups active in the forgery of money. Counterfeiting of the euro has led to a financial damage of at least EUR 500 million since the introduction of the euro in 2002. Europol considers that there is a long-term trend towards an increase in the crime level and notes that the criminal threat remains serious.

    Council Framework Decision 2000/383/JHA on increasing protection by criminal penalties and other sanctions against counterfeiting in connection with the introduction of the euro aims at supplementing, on the territory of European Union, the provisions of the Geneva Convention of 1929 which lays down rules ensuring that severe criminal penalties and other sanctions can be imposed for offences of counterfeiting currency.

    Although all Member States have, with minor exceptions, formally implemented the Framework Decision correctly, Member States have adopted diverging rules and consequently often diverging levels of protection and practices within their national legal systems. In particular, considerable differences exist with respect to the levels of sanctions which are applicable in the Member States to the main forms of counterfeiting. It is therefore essential to ensure that effective and efficient criminal law measures protect the euro and any other currency whose circulation is legally authorised in all Member States.

    IMPACT ASSESSMENT: the Commission conducted an impact assessment of policy alternatives, taking into account the consultations of the interested parties. After considering the possible options, the impact assessment concludes that the following solution would be preferred: (i) maintenance of most of the provisions from Council Framework Decision 2000/383/JHA in a new proposal, with minor modifications, taking into account the Treaty of Lisbon; (ii) modification of the provisions on penalties; and (iii) introduction of a new provision obliging Member States to provide for the possibility to use certain investigative tools.

    LEGAL BASIS: Article 83 (1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

    CONTENT: the purpose of this Directive is to supplement the provisions and to facilitate the application of the Geneva Convention by the Member States. It builds on and updates Council Framework Decision 2000/383/JHA seeking to increase protection by criminal penalties and other sanctions against counterfeiting in connection with the introduction of the euro. The proposal:

    ·        requires Member States to criminalise all forms of preparation and participation. Criminal responsibility for attempt is included for the majority of offences;

    ·        requires Member States to apply effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties in line with jurisprudence of the Court of Justice. For more serious cases of the offences of production and distribution of counterfeit currency, it sets out a sanction of imprisonment within a range of at least six months and eight years for natural persons;

    ·        requires Member States to ensure liability of legal persons, while excluding that such liability is alternative to that of natural persons, and to apply effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions on legal persons;

    ·        requires jurisdiction of the judicial authorities which allow them to initiate investigations, pursue prosecutions and bring to judgment cases relating to currency counterfeiting;

    ·        obliges Member States whose currency is the euro to exercise universal jurisdiction on euro counterfeiting offences under certain conditions;

    ·        ensures that investigative tools which are provided for in national law for organised crime or other serious crime cases can also be used in cases of counterfeiting of currency;

    ·        requires from Member States to ensure that the National Analysis Centres and the National Coin Analysis Centres can analyse euro counterfeits also during on-going judicial proceedings for the purpose of detecting further counterfeits;

    ·        requests that Member States are contracting parties of the International Geneva Convention of 20 April 1929.

    BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the proposal has no implications for the Budget of the European Union. 

activities
  • date: 2013-02-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0042/COM_COM(2013)0042_FR.pdf title: COM(2013)0042 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52013PC0042:EN url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2013:0019:FIN:EN:PDF type: Document attached to the procedure title: SWD(2013)0019 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2013:0020:FIN:EN:PDF type: Document attached to the procedure title: SWD(2013)0020 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/olaf/ title: European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) Commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas type: Legislative proposal
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: LIBE date: 2013-01-31T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: MCINTYRE Anthea
links
National parliaments
European Commission
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/olaf/ title: European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) commissioner: ŠEMETA Algirdas
procedure
Mandatory consultation of other institutions
European Central Bank
reference
2013/0023(COD)
instrument
Directive
legal_basis
Treaty on the Functioning of the EU TFEU 083-p1-a1
stage_reached
Preparatory phase in Parliament
summary
Repealing JHA act 2000/383/JHA (Framework Decision)
subtype
Legislation
title
Protection of the euro and other currencies against counterfeiting by criminal law
type
COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure)
subject