BETA
This is a historical view (2016/12/26)

Changes: 2020/02/19events.docs.url, 2020/01/05events, events.docs.url, 2019/11/15committees.rapporteur.date, events.docs.url, 2019/11/14committees.rapporteur.date, events.docs.url, 2019/11/13events.docs.url, 2019/11/12committees.rapporteur.date, committees.rapporteur, committees.opinion, 2019/11/10committees.rapporteur, committees.rapporteur.date, events.docs.url, 2019/11/09events.docs.url, 2019/11/08events.docs.url, 2019/11/07committees.rapporteur.date, committees.rapporteur, committees.opinion, 2019/11/01committees.rapporteur.date, committees.rapporteur, 2019/10/16committees.rapporteur, events.docs.url, 2019/09/20events.docs.url, 2019/09/17events.docs.url, committees.rapporteur, 2019/08/09committees.rapporteur, 2019/08/07committees.date, committees.rapporteur.date, 2019/08/05events.docs.url, 2019/08/03events.docs.url, 2019/08/02events.docs.url, 2019/08/01events.docs.url, 2019/07/31committees.rapporteur, committees.date, events.docs.url, 2019/07/30events.docs.url, 2019/07/29committees.date, committees.rapporteur, 2019/07/28events.docs.url, 2019/07/26events.docs.url, 2019/07/25events.docs.url, 2019/07/24events.docs.url, 2019/07/22events.docs.url, 2019/07/22events.docs.url, 2019/07/19events.docs.url, 2019/07/18events.docs.url, 2019/07/18events.docs.url, 2019/07/13events.docs.url, 2019/07/12events.docs.url, 2019/07/10events.docs.url, 2019/07/09committees.rapporteur, committees.date, events.docs.url, 2019/07/08committees.date, committees.rapporteur, 2019/07/06committees.date, events, committees.committee, committees.responsible, procedure.dossier_of_the_committee, activities, procedure.summary, other, procedure.subject, commission, committees, procedure.instrument, committees.type, committees.shadows, docs, committees.rapporteur, committees.associated, committees.committee_full, 2018/11/10activities.docs.url, 2018/07/01activities.docs.url, 2018/06/30activities.docs.url, activities.committees.rapporteur, activities.committees.date, committees.date, committees.rapporteur, 2018/06/17procedure.subject, activities.docs.url, 2018/01/09activities.docs.celexid, 2018/01/08activities.docs.celexid, 2017/06/17activities.docs.url, 2017/03/19other.dg.url, activities.docs.url, activities.commission.DG.url, 2017/03/14activities.docs.url, 2017/03/13activities.docs.celexid, 2017/03/12activities.docs.celexid, 2017/02/11activities.docs.url, 2017/01/20activities.docs.url, 2017/01/11activities.docs.url, 2017/01/10activities.docs.url, 2017/01/09activities.docs.url, 2017/01/07activities.docs.url, 2017/01/05activities.docs.url, 2017/01/03activities.docs.url, 2017/01/01activities.docs.url, 2016/12/31activities.docs.url, 2016/12/29activities.docs.url, 2016/12/26activities.docs.url

View current state | View Changes for this date

Awaiting committee decision



2013/0059(COD) Registered Traveller Programme (RTP)
RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Opinion AFET
Opinion BUDG HOHLMEIER Monika (EPP)
Opinion BUDG HOHLMEIER Monika (PPE)
Opinion DEVE
Lead LIBE FAJON Tanja (S&D) CORRAO Ignazio (EFD)
Lead LIBE ENCIU Ioan (S&D)
Lead committee dossier: LIBE/8/00153
Legal Basis TFEU 074, TFEU 077-p2

Activites

  • 2016/11/17 Additional information
  • 2014/10/20 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • 2013/03/14 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • 2013/02/28 Legislative proposal published
    • COM(2013)0097 summary
    • DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/', 'title': 'Migration and Home Affairs'}, MALMSTRÖM Cecilia

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
activities/3
date
2016-11-17T00:00:00
body
all
type
Additional information
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013PC0097:EN
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013PC0097:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013PC0097:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013PC0097:EN
links/European Commission/title
Old
PreLex
New
EUR-Lex
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf
activities/0/commission/0/DG/title
Old
Home Affairs
New
Migration and Home Affairs
other/0/dg/title
Old
Home Affairs
New
Migration and Home Affairs
activities/2
date
2014-10-20T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/1/committees/1/date
2014-10-13T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: HOHLMEIER Monika
committees/1/date
2014-10-13T00:00:00
committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: HOHLMEIER Monika
activities/1/committees/4/shadows
  • group: EFD name: CORRAO Ignazio
committees/4/shadows
  • group: EFD name: CORRAO Ignazio
activities/1/committees/4/date
2014-07-22T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/4/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja
committees/4/date
2014-07-22T00:00:00
committees/4/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: FAJON Tanja
activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de1857b0fb8127435bdbf06
New
4f1ac91bb819f25efd00010e
activities/1/committees/5/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de184800fb8127435bdbda1
New
4f1ac7c0b819f25efd0000a9
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de1857b0fb8127435bdbf06
New
4f1ac91bb819f25efd00010e
committees/5/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de184800fb8127435bdbda1
New
4f1ac7c0b819f25efd0000a9
activities/1/committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
BUDG
date
2013-12-10T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: PPE name: HOHLMEIER Monika
activities/1/committees/5
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
LIBE
date
2013-03-07T00:00:00
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur
group: S&D name: ENCIU Ioan
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
BUDG
date
2013-12-10T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: PPE name: HOHLMEIER Monika
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
LIBE
date
2013-03-07T00:00:00
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur
group: S&D name: ENCIU Ioan
activities/1/committees/3/date
2013-03-07T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/3/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: ENCIU Ioan
activities/1/committees/3/shadows
  • group: EPP name: SOMMER Renate
  • group: ALDE name: TORVALDS Nils
  • group: Verts/ALE name: KELLER Franziska
  • group: ECR name: KIRKHOPE Timothy
  • group: GUE/NGL name: TRIANTAPHYLLIDES Kyriacos
committees/3/date
2013-03-07T00:00:00
committees/3/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: ENCIU Ioan
committees/3/shadows
  • group: EPP name: SOMMER Renate
  • group: ALDE name: TORVALDS Nils
  • group: Verts/ALE name: KELLER Franziska
  • group: ECR name: KIRKHOPE Timothy
  • group: GUE/NGL name: TRIANTAPHYLLIDES Kyriacos
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
LIBE/7/12185
New
LIBE/8/00153
activities/1/committees/1/date
2013-12-10T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: HOHLMEIER Monika
committees/1/date
2013-12-10T00:00:00
committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: HOHLMEIER Monika
activities/0
date
2013-02-28T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52013PC0097:EN type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(2013)0097
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
commission
DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/ title: Home Affairs Commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
activities/0/body
Old
EP
New
EC
activities/0/commission
  • DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/ title: Home Affairs Commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
activities/0/date
Old
2014-04-14T00:00:00
New
2013-02-28T00:00:00
activities/0/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf title: COM(2013)0097 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52013PC0097:EN
activities/0/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Legislative proposal published
activities/0/docs/1
url
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2013:0050:FIN:EN:PDF
type
Document attached to the procedure
title
SWD(2013)0050
activities/0/docs/2
url
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2013:0051:FIN:EN:PDF
type
Document attached to the procedure
title
SWD(2013)0051
activities/0/docs/3
url
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2013:0052:FIN:EN:PDF
type
Document attached to the procedure
title
SWD(2013)0052
activities/0/type
Old
Legislative proposal
New
Legislative proposal published
activities/2
date
2013-05-22T00:00:00
docs
url: http://eescopinions.eesc.europa.eu/eescopiniondocument.aspx?language=EN&docnr=2662&year=2013 title: CES2662/2013 type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report celexid: CELEX:52013AE2662:EN
body
ESOC
type
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
activities/1/committees/1/date
2013-12-10T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: HOHLMEIER Monika
committees/1/date
2013-12-10T00:00:00
committees/1/rapporteur
  • group: EPP name: HOHLMEIER Monika
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013PC0097:EN
activities/2/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013AE2662:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013PC0097:EN
activities/2/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013AE2662:EN
procedure/summary
  • See also
procedure/summary
  • See also
procedure/summary
  • See also
activities/2/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52013AE2662:EN
activities/3
date
2014-04-14T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Awaiting committee decision
procedure/summary
  • See also
activities/2
date
2013-05-22T00:00:00
docs
url: http://eescopinions.eesc.europa.eu/eescopiniondocument.aspx?language=EN&docnr=2662&year=2013 type: Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report title: CES2662/2013
body
ESOC
type
Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
activities/1/committees/3/shadows
  • group: EPP name: SOMMER Renate
  • group: ALDE name: TORVALDS Nils
  • group: Verts/ALE name: KELLER Franziska
  • group: ECR name: KIRKHOPE Timothy
  • group: GUE/NGL name: TRIANTAPHYLLIDES Kyriacos
committees/3/shadows
  • group: EPP name: SOMMER Renate
  • group: ALDE name: TORVALDS Nils
  • group: Verts/ALE name: KELLER Franziska
  • group: ECR name: KIRKHOPE Timothy
  • group: GUE/NGL name: TRIANTAPHYLLIDES Kyriacos
activities/0/docs/0/text/0
Old

PURPOSE: to establish a Registered Traveller Programme (RTP) for third country national who travel frequently in the European Union.

PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.

BACKGROUND: according to the Schengen Borders Code, EU citizens and other persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law (e.g. family members of EU citizens) crossing the external border shall be subject to a minimum check, both at entry and exit, consisting of the verification of the travel document in order to establish the identity of the person. On the other hand, all third country nationals however must be subject, at entry, to a thorough check.

However, current rules for third-country nationals could be described as "one-size-fits-all" as the same checks apply regardless of any differences in risk between different travellers or their frequency of travel. This is because current legislation does not allow for exceptions to the principle of thorough border checks except for certain categories of third-country nationals, such as Heads of States, cross-border workers and border residents. Only a very small minority of persons crossing the external border are able to benefit from the above-mentioned exceptions (equivalent to 0.2 % of total passenger flows).

Taking into account the foreseen increase in passenger flows at the external borders, an alternative border check procedure should be offered for frequent third-country travellers moving gradually away from a "country-centric" approach towards a "person-centric" approach.

This is what is proposed in this proposed Regulation establishing a totally automated Registered Traveller Programme.

The establishment of an Entry/Exit System (EES) with or without biometrics which would record entries and exits of third-country nationals for short stays at the external borders would be the precondition for allowing full automation of the border checks for registered travellers.

The RTP together with the EES will improve management and control of travel flows at the border substantially by reinforcing checks while speeding up border crossings for frequent, pre-vetted non EU travellers.

It should be noted that this proposal has been presented together with a proposal to establish an Entry/Exit System (EES) for third country nationals and a proposal to amend the Community Code on the rules governing checks at external border crossing points and surveillance at the external border (Schengen Borders Code) for the purpose of the functioning of the two new systems.

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: a first impact assessment was carried out in 2008 when preparing the Commission Communication on this subject (please refer to the European Parliament’s position on this question – 2008/2181(INI)).

A second was completed in 2013. It analysed key implementation options. After the analysis of the options and their sub-options, a fee-based RTP for pre-vetted and pre-screened frequent third-country travellers with the data (biometrics, alphanumeric data and unique identifier number) stored in a Central Repository and the unique identifier (application number) stored in a token was found to be the most feasible option to guarantee smooth passenger flows at the external borders without decreasing the level of security at the EU.

This option would entail:

  • the retention of information for a maximum of five years;
  • an initial access to the RTP should be granted for one year that may be extended for two years, followed by a further two years without a new application;
  • four fingerprints should be stored in the Central Repository;
  • minimal use of personal data in a totally computerised EU system and a very limited consultation of data stored in the Central Repository (during border checks, the border guard will only receive a positive or negative response from the central repository).

The preferred option would therefore provide for a proportionate balance between security, facilitation and data protection.

LEGAL BASIS: Articles 74 and 77(2)(b) and (d) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

CONTENT: the proposal has three main objectives:

  1. to establish the procedures and conditions for access to the RTP;
  2. to define the purpose, the functionalities and responsibilities for a system combining tokens and a Central Repository for the storage of data on registered travellers; and
  3. to confer on the Agency for the operational management of large-scale information systems in the area of freedom, security and justice the development and operational management of the Central Repository and the definition of technical specifications for a token.

Set-up and technical architecture of the RTP: the RTP shall be based on a system for the storage of data on registered travellers which relies on tokens kept by the individual travellers on the one hand and on a Central Repository, a centrally located physical storage of the RTP data, on the other, together referred to as the "token-Central Repository".

The “token-Central Repository” system comprises the following: (i) a Central Repository and back-up Central Repository; (ii) uniform interfaces in each Member State, based on common technical specifications ; (iii) national network entry points linked to the Central Repository; (iv) a communications infrastructure linking the Central Repository and the network entry points; and (v) a token in the form of a machine-readable card, based on common technical standards, containing only a unique identifier.

Lodging an application for inclusion in the RTP: the proposal stipulates the procedures for acceptance to the RTP for those persons concerned. Technically, third-country nationals should be able to lodge an application for the RTP at the consulate of any Member State, at any common application centre, or at any external border crossing point.

An online application may also be made. Where an applicant is applying for access to the RTP for the first time, he/she shall be required to appear in person, in order to provide his/her fingerprints, for interview and for the travel document to be checked.

Where an applicant submits an on-line application, the biometric data shall be collected, the travel document checked and an interview carried out, if applicable, when the decision on the application is made and the token is issued.

Technical provisions are laid down stipulating the conditions to be met by the applicant to obtain his/her token:

  • application form: the applicant must fill in the form, an example of which is provided in Annex 1 of the proposal;
  • supporting documents: the applicant must provide supporting documents (travel documents…) a non-exhaustive list of which is provided in Annex II of the proposal, as well as proof of sufficient means of subsistence in relation to the travel and accommodation;
  • fees: when making an application, the applicant shal pay a registration fee of EUR 20. If the RTP application is examined at the same time with the multiple-entry visa application, the applicant shall pay a fee of EUR 10;
  • biometric data: where the applicant has not previously applied for access to the RTP, Member States shall collect biometric data from applicants comprising their four fingerprints taken flat and collected digitally. Where fingerprints collected from the applicant as part of an earlier application were entered in the Central Repository for the first time less than 59 months before the date of the new application, they may be copied to the subsequent application.

An application which is admissible shall be decided on by the competent authorities within 25 calendar days from the date of submission.

Duration of granting of access to the RTP: initial access to the RTP shall be granted for one year. Access may be extended for two years upon request, followed by a further two years without a new application in the case of travellers who have followed the rules and regulations laid down for crossing the external border and for staying in the Schengen area. The period of access granted shall not exceed the validity of the travel document(s), visa, residence permit or residence card, if applicable.

Provisions are laid down in regard to the extension, refusal or revocation of access to the RTP.

Operation of the system for registered travellers:

Once an application for the RTP has been validated, a registered traveller would be issued a token in the form of a machine-readable card containing only a unique identifier (i.e. application number), which is swiped on arrival and departure at the border using an automated gate. The gate would read the token and the travel document (and visa sticker number, if applicable) and the fingerprints of the travellers, which would be compared to the ones stored in the Central Repository and other databases, including the Visa Information system (VIS) for visa holders. If all checks are successful, the traveller is able to pass through the automated gate.

Administrative management and organisation: provisions are laid down for ensuring the administrative management of the system. Each Member State shall be responsible for organising the procedures related to submission and examination of applications as well as issuing tokens.

Data protection and use of data: the proposal includes a number of provisions on data protection, as well as defining strictly those persons with exclusive access to the RTP having the right to enter, amend, delete and consult data depending on the objectives pursued. National authorities should be designated to this end.

The proposal specifies the categories of data that will be entered by the competent authorities in the combined system of the Central Repository and the tokens, the procedures to be followed when entering data, as well as the specific and strictly limited cases of where these data may be used by the authorised persons.

  • Retention of data: Each individual application file shall be stored in the Central Repository for a maximum of five years. The registered traveller shall inform the issuing authority if the token has been lost or stolen.
  • Communication of data to third parties: data stored in the Central Repository shall not, under any circumstance, be transferred or made available to a third country, to an international organisation or any private party.

Provision is also made for data security, control of the use of data, as well as for sanctions in the event of their inappropriate use and for procedural guarantees for persons whose data have been used (including appeal mechanisms, etc.).

Role of the Agency: the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale information systems in the area of freedom, security and justice shall be entrusted with the tasks of development and operational management of the EES. The Agency shall be responsible for the development of the Central Unit, the Back-Up Central Unit, the Uniform Interfaces including the Network Entry Points and the Communication Infrastructure. Technical provisions lay down the tasks, mission and responsibilities of the Agency in this context. Provisions are also included defining the Member States’ responsibilities in regard to the EES infrastructure and its use.

Operational management of the EES shall consist of all the tasks necessary to keep the EES functioning 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Evaluation: two years after the start of operations of the EES and every two years thereafter, the Agency shall submit to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission a report on the technical functioning of EES, including the security thereof. For its part, , the Commission shall produce an overall evaluation of the EES two years after the EES is brought into operation and every four years thereafter.

Territorial measures: given that the proposal constitutes a further development of the Schengen acquis, it will have direct consequences for certain Member States and associated countries, in accordance with the relevant texts of the Treaties, Protocols and Agreements concluded with third countries:

  • Denmark shall decide within a period of six months after the Council has decided on this proposal whether it will implement it in its national law;
  • Ireland and the United Kingdom: these Member States are not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and are not bound by it or subject to its application;
  • Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and Liechtenstein shall be associated with the application of this Regulation;
  • Cyprus, Bulgaria and Romania shall apply this Regulation because it replaces the requirement to check the length of stay of third country nationals.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: the Commission's proposal for the next multi-annual financial framework (MFF) includes a proposal of EUR 4.6 billion for the Internal Security Fund (ISF) for the period 2014-2020. In the proposal, EUR 1.1 billion is set aside as an indicative amount for the development of an EES and an RTP assuming development costs would start from 2015.

This financial support would cover not only the costs of central components for the entire MFF period (EU level, both development and operational cost) but also the development costs for the national, Member States, components of these two systems, within the resources available.

DELEGATED ACTS: the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the adoption of technical amendments to the annexes.

New

PURPOSE: to establish a Registered Traveller Programme (RTP) for third country national who travel frequently in the European Union.

PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.

BACKGROUND: according to the Schengen Borders Code, EU citizens and other persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law (e.g. family members of EU citizens) crossing the external border shall be subject to a minimum check, both at entry and exit, consisting of the verification of the travel document in order to establish the identity of the person. On the other hand, all third country nationals however must be subject, at entry, to a thorough check.

However, current rules for third-country nationals could be described as "one-size-fits-all" as the same checks apply regardless of any differences in risk between different travellers or their frequency of travel. This is because current legislation does not allow for exceptions to the principle of thorough border checks except for certain categories of third-country nationals, such as Heads of States, cross-border workers and border residents. Only a very small minority of persons crossing the external border are able to benefit from the above-mentioned exceptions (equivalent to 0.2 % of total passenger flows).

Taking into account the foreseen increase in passenger flows at the external borders, an alternative border check procedure should be offered for frequent third-country travellers moving gradually away from a "country-centric" approach towards a "person-centric" approach.

This is what is proposed in this proposed Regulation establishing a totally automated Registered Traveller Programme.

The establishment of an Entry/Exit System (EES) with or without biometrics which would record entries and exits of third-country nationals for short stays at the external borders would be the precondition for allowing full automation of the border checks for registered travellers.

The RTP together with the EES will improve management and control of travel flows at the border substantially by reinforcing checks while speeding up border crossings for frequent, pre-vetted non EU travellers.

It should be noted that this proposal has been presented together with a proposal to establish an Entry/Exit System (EES) for third country nationals and a proposal to amend the Community Code on the rules governing checks at external border crossing points and surveillance at the external border (Schengen Borders Code) for the purpose of the functioning of the two new systems.

IMPACT ASSESSMENT: a first impact assessment was carried out in 2008 when preparing the Commission Communication on this subject (please refer to the European Parliament’s position on this question – 2008/2181(INI)).

A second was completed in 2013. It analysed key implementation options. After the analysis of the options and their sub-options, a fee-based RTP for pre-vetted and pre-screened frequent third-country travellers with the data (biometrics, alphanumeric data and unique identifier number) stored in a Central Repository and the unique identifier (application number) stored in a token was found to be the most feasible option to guarantee smooth passenger flows at the external borders without decreasing the level of security at the EU.

This option would entail:

  • the retention of information for a maximum of five years;
  • an initial access to the RTP should be granted for one year that may be extended for two years, followed by a further two years without a new application;
  • four fingerprints should be stored in the Central Repository;
  • minimal use of personal data in a totally computerised EU system and a very limited consultation of data stored in the Central Repository (during border checks, the border guard will only receive a positive or negative response from the central repository).

The preferred option would therefore provide for a proportionate balance between security, facilitation and data protection.

LEGAL BASIS: Articles 74 and 77(2)(b) and (d) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

CONTENT: the proposal has three main objectives:

  1. to establish the procedures and conditions for access to the RTP;
  2. to define the purpose, the functionalities and responsibilities for a system combining tokens and a Central Repository for the storage of data on registered travellers; and
  3. to confer on the Agency for the operational management of large-scale information systems in the area of freedom, security and justice the development and operational management of the Central Repository and the definition of technical specifications for a token.

Set-up and technical architecture of the RTP: the RTP shall be based on a system for the storage of data on registered travellers which relies on tokens kept by the individual travellers on the one hand and on a Central Repository, a centrally located physical storage of the RTP data, on the other, together referred to as the "token-Central Repository".

The “token-Central Repository” system comprises the following: (i) a Central Repository and back-up Central Repository; (ii) uniform interfaces in each Member State, based on common technical specifications ; (iii) national network entry points linked to the Central Repository; (iv) a communications infrastructure linking the Central Repository and the network entry points; and (v) a token in the form of a machine-readable card, based on common technical standards, containing only a unique identifier.

Lodging an application for inclusion in the RTP: the proposal stipulates the procedures for acceptance to the RTP for those persons concerned. Technically, third-country nationals should be able to lodge an application for the RTP at the consulate of any Member State, at any common application centre, or at any external border crossing point.

An online application may also be made. Where an applicant is applying for access to the RTP for the first time, he/she shall be required to appear in person, in order to provide his/her fingerprints, for interview and for the travel document to be checked.

Where an applicant submits an on-line application, the biometric data shall be collected, the travel document checked and an interview carried out, if applicable, when the decision on the application is made and the token is issued.

Technical provisions are laid down stipulating the conditions to be met by the applicant to obtain his/her token:

  • application form: the applicant must fill in the form, an example of which is provided in Annex 1 of the proposal;
  • supporting documents: the applicant must provide supporting documents (travel documents…) a non-exhaustive list of which is provided in Annex II of the proposal, as well as proof of sufficient means of subsistence in relation to the travel and accommodation;
  • fees: when making an application, the applicant shal pay a registration fee of EUR 20. If the RTP application is examined at the same time with the multiple-entry visa application, the applicant shall pay a fee of EUR 10;
  • biometric data: where the applicant has not previously applied for access to the RTP, Member States shall collect biometric data from applicants comprising their four fingerprints taken flat and collected digitally. Where fingerprints collected from the applicant as part of an earlier application were entered in the Central Repository for the first time less than 59 months before the date of the new application, they may be copied to the subsequent application.

An application which is admissible shall be decided on by the competent authorities within 25 calendar days from the date of submission.

Duration of granting of access to the RTP: initial access to the RTP shall be granted for one year. Access may be extended for two years upon request, followed by a further two years without a new application in the case of travellers who have followed the rules and regulations laid down for crossing the external border and for staying in the Schengen area. The period of access granted shall not exceed the validity of the travel document(s), visa, residence permit or residence card, if applicable.

Provisions are laid down in regard to the extension, refusal or revocation of access to the RTP.

Operation of the system for registered travellers:

Once an application for the RTP has been validated, a registered traveller would be issued a token in the form of a machine-readable card containing only a unique identifier (i.e. application number), which is swiped on arrival and departure at the border using an automated gate. The gate would read the token and the travel document (and visa sticker number, if applicable) and the fingerprints of the travellers, which would be compared to the ones stored in the Central Repository and other databases, including the Visa Information system (VIS) for visa holders. If all checks are successful, the traveller is able to pass through the automated gate.

Administrative management and organisation: provisions are laid down for ensuring the administrative management of the system. Each Member State shall be responsible for organising the procedures related to submission and examination of applications as well as issuing tokens.

Data protection and use of data: the proposal includes a number of provisions on data protection, as well as defining strictly those persons with exclusive access to the RTP having the right to enter, amend, delete and consult data depending on the objectives pursued. National authorities should be designated to this end.

The proposal specifies the categories of data that will be entered by the competent authorities in the combined system of the Central Repository and the tokens, the procedures to be followed when entering data, as well as the specific and strictly limited cases of where these data may be used by the authorised persons.

  • Retention of data: Each individual application file shall be stored in the Central Repository for a maximum of five years. The registered traveller shall inform the issuing authority if the token has been lost or stolen.
  • Communication of data to third parties: data stored in the Central Repository shall not, under any circumstance, be transferred or made available to a third country, to an international organisation or any private party.

Provision is also made for data security, control of the use of data, as well as for sanctions in the event of their inappropriate use and for procedural guarantees for persons whose data have been used (including appeal mechanisms, etc.).

Role of the Agency: the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale information systems in the area of freedom, security and justice shall be entrusted with the tasks of development and operational management of the EES. The Agency shall be responsible for the development of the Central Unit, the Back-Up Central Unit, the Uniform Interfaces including the Network Entry Points and the Communication Infrastructure. Technical provisions lay down the tasks, mission and responsibilities of the Agency in this context. Provisions are also included defining the Member States’ responsibilities in regard to the EES infrastructure and its use.

Operational management of the EES shall consist of all the tasks necessary to keep the EES functioning 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Evaluation: two years after the start of operations of the EES and every two years thereafter, the Agency shall submit to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission a report on the technical functioning of EES, including the security thereof. For its part, , the Commission shall produce an overall evaluation of the EES two years after the EES is brought into operation and every four years thereafter.

Territorial measures: given that the proposal constitutes a further development of the Schengen acquis, it will have direct consequences for certain Member States and associated countries, in accordance with the relevant texts of the Treaties, Protocols and Agreements concluded with third countries:

  • Denmark shall decide within a period of six months after the Council has decided on this proposal whether it will implement it in its national law;
  • Ireland and the United Kingdom: these Member States are not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and are not bound by it or subject to its application;
  • Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and Liechtenstein shall be associated with the application of this Regulation;
  • Cyprus, Bulgaria and Romania shall apply this Regulation because it replaces the requirement to check the length of stay of third country nationals.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: the Commission's proposal for the next multi-annual financial framework (MFF) includes a proposal of EUR 4.6 billion for the Internal Security Fund (ISF) for the period 2014-2020. In the proposal, EUR 1.1 billion is set aside as an indicative amount for the development of an EES and an RTP assuming development costs would start from 2015.

This financial support would cover not only the costs of central components for the entire MFF period (EU level, both development and operational cost) but also the development costs for the national, Member States, components of these two systems, within the resources available.

DELEGATED ACTS: the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the adoption of technical amendments to the annexes.

activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: to establish a Registered Traveller Programme (RTP) for third country national who travel frequently in the European Union.

    PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.

    ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.

    BACKGROUND: according to the Schengen Borders Code, EU citizens and other persons enjoying the right of free movement under Union law (e.g. family members of EU citizens) crossing the external border shall be subject to a minimum check, both at entry and exit, consisting of the verification of the travel document in order to establish the identity of the person. On the other hand, all third country nationals however must be subject, at entry, to a thorough check.

    However, current rules for third-country nationals could be described as "one-size-fits-all" as the same checks apply regardless of any differences in risk between different travellers or their frequency of travel. This is because current legislation does not allow for exceptions to the principle of thorough border checks except for certain categories of third-country nationals, such as Heads of States, cross-border workers and border residents. Only a very small minority of persons crossing the external border are able to benefit from the above-mentioned exceptions (equivalent to 0.2 % of total passenger flows).

    Taking into account the foreseen increase in passenger flows at the external borders, an alternative border check procedure should be offered for frequent third-country travellers moving gradually away from a "country-centric" approach towards a "person-centric" approach.

    This is what is proposed in this proposed Regulation establishing a totally automated Registered Traveller Programme.

    The establishment of an Entry/Exit System (EES) with or without biometrics which would record entries and exits of third-country nationals for short stays at the external borders would be the precondition for allowing full automation of the border checks for registered travellers.

    The RTP together with the EES will improve management and control of travel flows at the border substantially by reinforcing checks while speeding up border crossings for frequent, pre-vetted non EU travellers.

    It should be noted that this proposal has been presented together with a proposal to establish an Entry/Exit System (EES) for third country nationals and a proposal to amend the Community Code on the rules governing checks at external border crossing points and surveillance at the external border (Schengen Borders Code) for the purpose of the functioning of the two new systems.

    IMPACT ASSESSMENT: a first impact assessment was carried out in 2008 when preparing the Commission Communication on this subject (please refer to the European Parliament’s position on this question – 2008/2181(INI)).

    A second was completed in 2013. It analysed key implementation options. After the analysis of the options and their sub-options, a fee-based RTP for pre-vetted and pre-screened frequent third-country travellers with the data (biometrics, alphanumeric data and unique identifier number) stored in a Central Repository and the unique identifier (application number) stored in a token was found to be the most feasible option to guarantee smooth passenger flows at the external borders without decreasing the level of security at the EU.

    This option would entail:

    • the retention of information for a maximum of five years;
    • an initial access to the RTP should be granted for one year that may be extended for two years, followed by a further two years without a new application;
    • four fingerprints should be stored in the Central Repository;
    • minimal use of personal data in a totally computerised EU system and a very limited consultation of data stored in the Central Repository (during border checks, the border guard will only receive a positive or negative response from the central repository).

    The preferred option would therefore provide for a proportionate balance between security, facilitation and data protection.

    LEGAL BASIS: Articles 74 and 77(2)(b) and (d) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

    CONTENT: the proposal has three main objectives:

    1. to establish the procedures and conditions for access to the RTP;
    2. to define the purpose, the functionalities and responsibilities for a system combining tokens and a Central Repository for the storage of data on registered travellers; and
    3. to confer on the Agency for the operational management of large-scale information systems in the area of freedom, security and justice the development and operational management of the Central Repository and the definition of technical specifications for a token.

    Set-up and technical architecture of the RTP: the RTP shall be based on a system for the storage of data on registered travellers which relies on tokens kept by the individual travellers on the one hand and on a Central Repository, a centrally located physical storage of the RTP data, on the other, together referred to as the "token-Central Repository".

    The “token-Central Repository” system comprises the following: (i) a Central Repository and back-up Central Repository; (ii) uniform interfaces in each Member State, based on common technical specifications ; (iii) national network entry points linked to the Central Repository; (iv) a communications infrastructure linking the Central Repository and the network entry points; and (v) a token in the form of a machine-readable card, based on common technical standards, containing only a unique identifier.

    Lodging an application for inclusion in the RTP: the proposal stipulates the procedures for acceptance to the RTP for those persons concerned. Technically, third-country nationals should be able to lodge an application for the RTP at the consulate of any Member State, at any common application centre, or at any external border crossing point.

    An online application may also be made. Where an applicant is applying for access to the RTP for the first time, he/she shall be required to appear in person, in order to provide his/her fingerprints, for interview and for the travel document to be checked.

    Where an applicant submits an on-line application, the biometric data shall be collected, the travel document checked and an interview carried out, if applicable, when the decision on the application is made and the token is issued.

    Technical provisions are laid down stipulating the conditions to be met by the applicant to obtain his/her token:

    • application form: the applicant must fill in the form, an example of which is provided in Annex 1 of the proposal;
    • supporting documents: the applicant must provide supporting documents (travel documents…) a non-exhaustive list of which is provided in Annex II of the proposal, as well as proof of sufficient means of subsistence in relation to the travel and accommodation;
    • fees: when making an application, the applicant shal pay a registration fee of EUR 20. If the RTP application is examined at the same time with the multiple-entry visa application, the applicant shall pay a fee of EUR 10;
    • biometric data: where the applicant has not previously applied for access to the RTP, Member States shall collect biometric data from applicants comprising their four fingerprints taken flat and collected digitally. Where fingerprints collected from the applicant as part of an earlier application were entered in the Central Repository for the first time less than 59 months before the date of the new application, they may be copied to the subsequent application.

    An application which is admissible shall be decided on by the competent authorities within 25 calendar days from the date of submission.

    Duration of granting of access to the RTP: initial access to the RTP shall be granted for one year. Access may be extended for two years upon request, followed by a further two years without a new application in the case of travellers who have followed the rules and regulations laid down for crossing the external border and for staying in the Schengen area. The period of access granted shall not exceed the validity of the travel document(s), visa, residence permit or residence card, if applicable.

    Provisions are laid down in regard to the extension, refusal or revocation of access to the RTP.

    Operation of the system for registered travellers:

    Once an application for the RTP has been validated, a registered traveller would be issued a token in the form of a machine-readable card containing only a unique identifier (i.e. application number), which is swiped on arrival and departure at the border using an automated gate. The gate would read the token and the travel document (and visa sticker number, if applicable) and the fingerprints of the travellers, which would be compared to the ones stored in the Central Repository and other databases, including the Visa Information system (VIS) for visa holders. If all checks are successful, the traveller is able to pass through the automated gate.

    Administrative management and organisation: provisions are laid down for ensuring the administrative management of the system. Each Member State shall be responsible for organising the procedures related to submission and examination of applications as well as issuing tokens.

    Data protection and use of data: the proposal includes a number of provisions on data protection, as well as defining strictly those persons with exclusive access to the RTP having the right to enter, amend, delete and consult data depending on the objectives pursued. National authorities should be designated to this end.

    The proposal specifies the categories of data that will be entered by the competent authorities in the combined system of the Central Repository and the tokens, the procedures to be followed when entering data, as well as the specific and strictly limited cases of where these data may be used by the authorised persons.

    • Retention of data: Each individual application file shall be stored in the Central Repository for a maximum of five years. The registered traveller shall inform the issuing authority if the token has been lost or stolen.
    • Communication of data to third parties: data stored in the Central Repository shall not, under any circumstance, be transferred or made available to a third country, to an international organisation or any private party.

    Provision is also made for data security, control of the use of data, as well as for sanctions in the event of their inappropriate use and for procedural guarantees for persons whose data have been used (including appeal mechanisms, etc.).

    Role of the Agency: the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale information systems in the area of freedom, security and justice shall be entrusted with the tasks of development and operational management of the EES. The Agency shall be responsible for the development of the Central Unit, the Back-Up Central Unit, the Uniform Interfaces including the Network Entry Points and the Communication Infrastructure. Technical provisions lay down the tasks, mission and responsibilities of the Agency in this context. Provisions are also included defining the Member States’ responsibilities in regard to the EES infrastructure and its use.

    Operational management of the EES shall consist of all the tasks necessary to keep the EES functioning 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

    Evaluation: two years after the start of operations of the EES and every two years thereafter, the Agency shall submit to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission a report on the technical functioning of EES, including the security thereof. For its part, , the Commission shall produce an overall evaluation of the EES two years after the EES is brought into operation and every four years thereafter.

    Territorial measures: given that the proposal constitutes a further development of the Schengen acquis, it will have direct consequences for certain Member States and associated countries, in accordance with the relevant texts of the Treaties, Protocols and Agreements concluded with third countries:

    • Denmark shall decide within a period of six months after the Council has decided on this proposal whether it will implement it in its national law;
    • Ireland and the United Kingdom: these Member States are not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and are not bound by it or subject to its application;
    • Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and Liechtenstein shall be associated with the application of this Regulation;
    • Cyprus, Bulgaria and Romania shall apply this Regulation because it replaces the requirement to check the length of stay of third country nationals.

    BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: the Commission's proposal for the next multi-annual financial framework (MFF) includes a proposal of EUR 4.6 billion for the Internal Security Fund (ISF) for the period 2014-2020. In the proposal, EUR 1.1 billion is set aside as an indicative amount for the development of an EES and an RTP assuming development costs would start from 2015.

    This financial support would cover not only the costs of central components for the entire MFF period (EU level, both development and operational cost) but also the development costs for the national, Member States, components of these two systems, within the resources available.

    DELEGATED ACTS: the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of the adoption of technical amendments to the annexes.

activities/1/committees/3/date
2013-03-07T00:00:00
activities/1/committees/3/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: ENCIU Ioan
committees/3/date
2013-03-07T00:00:00
committees/3/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: ENCIU Ioan
activities
  • date: 2013-02-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0097/COM_COM(2013)0097_EN.pdf title: COM(2013)0097 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52013PC0097:EN url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2013:0050:FIN:EN:PDF type: Document attached to the procedure title: SWD(2013)0050 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2013:0051:FIN:EN:PDF type: Document attached to the procedure title: SWD(2013)0051 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2013:0052:FIN:EN:PDF type: Document attached to the procedure title: SWD(2013)0052 type: Legislative proposal body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/ title: Home Affairs Commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
  • date: 2013-03-14T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE
  • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
links
National parliaments
European Commission
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/ title: Home Affairs commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
LIBE/7/12185
reference
2013/0059(COD)
instrument
Regulation
legal_basis
stage_reached
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
summary
See also
subtype
Legislation
title
Registered Traveller Programme (RTP)
type
COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure)
subject