Progress: Awaiting committee decision
| Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | ECON | ||
| Former Responsible Committee | ECON |
LUCKE Bernd ( ECR)
|
|
| Former Responsible Committee | ECON | ||
| Committee Opinion | EMPL | ||
| Committee Opinion | REGI | ||
| Former Committee Opinion | EMPL | ||
| Former Committee Opinion | EMPL | ||
| Former Committee Opinion | REGI |
GODMANIS Ivars ( ALDE),
MĂNESCU Ramona Nicole ( ALDE)
|
|
| Former Committee Opinion | REGI |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 338-p1
Legal Basis:
TFEU 338-p1Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 614 votes to 56 with 6 abstentions, certain amendments to the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the provision and quality of statistics for the macroeconomic imbalances procedure (MIP).
The matter had been referred back to the competent committee. The vote had been postponed to a later session.
The main amendments adopted in plenary were as follows:
Quality of data : Parliament underlined that reliable, accurate and useful statistical data are essential for effective surveillance of macroeconomic imbalances. To guarantee this goal, the independence of Eurostat should be strengthened in line with the European Parliament's proposals for the revision of Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Quality assurance procedures : the procedures put in place in the framework of this Regulation shall build on and take into consideration best practices in existing quality assurance procedures. They shall not result in the duplication of quality assurance efforts nor parallel data series.
Transmission of data to the Commission : in order to clarify the process for transmission, reporting and communication of the data, Members suggested including a cut-off date for the extraction by the Commission (Eurostat) of the MIP relevant data to compute for each Member State the MIP scoreboard indicators and set up a reference database on MIP relevant data.
The Commission (Eurostat) shall make public the MIP relevant data used for the purposes of the macroeconomic imbalances procedure. It shall determine the publication date for the news release and communicate it to Member States within ten working days after the cut-off date
Dialogue missions to Member States : in order to improve the effectiveness of the proposed procedures, Parliament wanted: i) to call the missions “dialogue missions» in the Member States; ii) to clarify that the aim of these missions is to investigate in depth the quality of the data ; iii) to ensure the right selection and distribution as well as a rotation of experts in good time, and iv) to provide that the general provision in relation to the dialogue missions does not apply where the sectoral legislation already foresees these Commission visits to Member States.
Provision of data by the Commission : when the Commission (Eurostat) expresses a reservation on the quality of a Member State's MIP relevant data, the Member State concerned shall be given the opportunity to defend its position.
Sanctions : Members suggested that the Council, acting on the recommendations of the Commission, might decide, via a two-step procedure: 1) to impose an interest-bearing deposit and subsequently, if the Commission assesses that the Member States has not complied with the corrective actions, as a last resort measure, 2) inflict a fine on a Member State that has acted intentionally to misrepresent the data or in the case of serious negligence which has impacted on the ability of the Commission to make a true and fair assessment.
The Member State shall report to the Commission within a specified deadline on the corrective actions necessary to address and remedy the misrepresentation or serious negligence as well as to prevent similar circumstances to arise in future. The report shall be made public.
The interest-bearing deposit shall be effective, dissuasive and proportionate to the nature, seriousness and duration of the misrepresentation and the amount of the interest bearing shall not exceed 0.05% of the GDP in the preceding year of the Member State concerned.
Role of Parliament : the Commission shall inform the competent Committee of the European Parliament of any investigation or recommendation made pursuant to this regulation. The competent committee of the European Parliament may offer a Member State which is the subject of a Commission recommendation an opportunity to participate in an exchange of views.
Report : the Commission (Eurostat) shall report at least annually to the European Parliament and to the Council on the activities carried out by the Commission (Eurostat) for the purpose of implementing the Regulation in the context of the European Semester.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report by Derk Jan EPPINK (ECR, BE) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the provision and quality of statistics for the macroeconomic imbalances procedure (MIP).
The parliamentary committee recommended that the position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure modify the Commission proposal as follows.
Quality of data : Members underlined that reliable, accurate and useful statistical data are essential for effective surveillance of macroeconomic imbalances. To guarantee this goal, the independence of Eurostat should be strengthened in line with the European Parliament's proposals for the revision of Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Quality assurance procedures : the procedures put in place in the framework of this Regulation shall build on and take into consideration best practices in existing quality assurance procedures. They shall not result in the duplication of quality assurance efforts nor parallel data series.
Transmission of data to the Commission : in order to clarify the process for transmission, reporting and communication of the data, Members suggested including (i) a cut-off date when the Commission (Eurostat) would extract the time series needed for the MIP Scoreboard and (ii) a publication date for the news release of the MIP Scoreboard indicators.
Dialogue missions to Member States : in order to improve the effectiveness of the proposed procedures, the report suggested: i) to call the missions “dialogue missions”in the Member States; ii) to clarify that the aim of these missions is to investigate in depth the quality of the data ; iii) to ensure the right selection and distribution as well as a rotation of experts in good time, and iv) to provide that the general provision in relation to the dialogue missions does not apply where the sectoral legislation already foresees these visits.
Provision of data by the Commission : when the Commission (Eurostat) expresses a reservation on the quality of a Member State's MIP relevant data, the Member State concerned shall be given the opportunity to defend its position.
Sanctions : Members suggested that the Council, acting on the recommendations of the Commission, might decide, via a two-step procedure: 1) to impose an interest-bearing deposit and subsequently, if the Commission assesses that the Member States has not complied with the corrective actions, as a last resort measure, 2) inflict a fine on a Member State that has acted intentionally to misrepresent the data or in the case of serious negligence which has impacted on the ability of the Commission to make a true and fair assessment.
The Member State shall report to the Commission within a specified deadline on the corrective actions necessary to address and remedy the misrepresentation or serious negligence as well as to prevent similar circumstances to arise in future. The report shall be made public.
The interest-bearing deposit shall be effective, dissuasive and proportionate to the nature, seriousness and duration of the misrepresentation and the amount of the interest bearing shall not exceed 0.05% of the GDP in the preceding year of the Member State concerned.
Role of Parliament : the Commission shall inform the competent Committee of the European Parliament of any investigation or recommendation made pursuant to this regulation. The competent committee of the European Parliament may offer a Member State which is the subject of a Commission recommendation an opportunity to participate in an exchange of views.
Report : the Commission (Eurostat) shall report at least annually to the European Parliament and to the Council on the activities carried out by the Commission (Eurostat) for the purpose of implementing this Regulation in the context of the European Semester.
Opinion of the European Central Bank on a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the provision and quality of statistics for the macroeconomic imbalances procedure.
The ECB underlines the importance of ensuring reliable statistical data for the macroeconomic imbalances procedure (MIP) established under Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances.
Within this context, the Commission has started a legislative initiative to assure the statistical quality of the MIP. The initiative aims to secure that the compilation, monitoring and release of the macroeconomic and financial statistics relevant for the elaboration of MIP scoreboard indicators is conducted in a manner that delivers sound and independent figures.
The proposed regulation provides that the Commission may carry out missions to investigate any problems and propose that the Council imposes fines on Member States that misrepresent MIP relevant data intentionally or by serious negligence.
European Statistical System (ESS) and European System of Central Banks (ESCB) quality assurance of the statistics underlying the MIP : the quality assurance of macroeconomic and financial statistics is secured by the ESS and the ESCB as producers of European statistics.
The ECB notes that the quality framework suggested by the proposed regulation targets statistical data for the MIP, while neglecting other economic and monetary policy purposes. It thereby seems to establish parallel quality assessments instead of integrating the statistical data for the MIP into the existing quality frameworks.
Consequently, the ECB recommends that rather than introducing a new quality assurance framework by means of the proposed regulation, the already existing quality assurance arrangements of the ESS and the ESCB should also be applied to statistical data for the MIP.
Enhancing quality assurance of statistics through a closer cooperation of the ESS and ESCB: since the responsibilities for the production of the macroeconomic and financial statistics underlying the indicators for the MIP are shared between the ESS and the ESCB, close cooperation between the two systems is necessary to assure their quality.
The ECB points to the work initiated by the Committee on Monetary, Financial and Balance of Payments Statistics (CMFB), with a view to assessing the quality and comparability of the MIP relevant data under the current statistical legal framework. Once the work of the CMFB has progressed, practical arrangements for the cooperation between the ESS and the ESCB on quality assurance frameworks for statistical data for the MIP could be laid down.
PURPOSE: to set in place a common and reliable procedure for the provision of relevant data for the macroeconomic imbalances procedure (MIP).
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: this initiative fits into the political context of improving of the economic governance of the Union which requires an ability to detect, prevent and correct macroeconomic imbalances.
For this purpose, Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011 set out detailed rules for the early detection, prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances which emerge or persist in the euro area and the EU (the Macroeconomic Imbalances Procedure or MIP).
The MIP and its scoreboard of indicators require efficient statistical quality monitoring of the indicators and of the underlying statistical information.
The ECOFIN Councils of 8 November 2011 and 13 November 2012 underlined the importance for the credibility of the MIP of having timely statistics of the highest quality for inclusion in the scoreboard and invited the Commission (Eurostat) to take all necessary initiatives to assure a reliable procedure for the compilation of these statistics.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: no impact assessment was undertaken. The successful implementation of this Regulation will mainly require close cooperation from Member States’ statistical authorities with a view to improving the quality of the MIP relevant data and the underlying statistical information. No additional data collection mechanisms are foreseen.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 338(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
CONTENT: the proposed Regulation sets out the rules governing the way the statistical data that are relevant for the macroeconomic imbalances procedure are provided . These rules relate to the compilation, quality monitoring and release of the indicators in the macroeconomic imbalances procedure scoreboard.
This Regulation will cover the monitoring of data quality; the compilation and transmission of data and metadata, and the reporting/communication on the data to the different stakeholders and to the European Parliament and the Council.
The Regulation will introduce new tasks for the Commission (Eurostat) on the following main aspects:
validating the quality of the MIP relevant data in relation to quality criteria that either exist already or will be further specified in certain areas; structuring, collecting and analysing Member States’ compilation sources and methods; and developing and implementing an improvement action plan.
The work on the MIP relevant data will need to be supported by good website publication and dissemination arrangements, as well as release actions.
The implementation of the proposed Regulation with a view to providing high quality statistics will require close cooperation with Member States’ statistical authorities covering both the scoreboard data and the underlying statistical information.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: additional resources will be necessary in order to assure the high quality requirements for the MIP-relevant data. This has meant introducing a staff bid for 21 posts (12 posts and 9 external personnel) to cover the tasks required of the Commission (Eurostat).
The overall impact on the EU budget is estimated at EUR 9.788 million for the period 2013-2016 .
Moreover, the Commission will need assistance from Member States’ experts in the context of the MIP missions covered by this proposal. At this stage, it is difficult to give a precise estimate of costs, in particular because all possible synergies will be sought with Eurostat missions in related areas.
Documents
- Debate in Council: 3468
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading: T7-0181/2014
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0143/2014
- European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report: CON/2013/0072
- European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report: OJ C 014 18.01.2014, p. 0005
- Contribution: COM(2013)0342
- Contribution: COM(2013)0342
- Contribution: COM(2013)0342
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2013)0342
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- European Central Bank: opinion, guideline, report: CON/2013/0072 OJ C 014 18.01.2014, p. 0005
- Contribution: COM(2013)0342
- Contribution: COM(2013)0342
- Contribution: COM(2013)0342
Votes
A7-0143/2014 - Derk Jan Eppink - Vote unique #
PPE
S&D
Verts/ALE
EFD
NI
GUE/NGL| Amendments | Dossier |
| 128 |
2013/0181(COD)
2013/12/10
REGI
44 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) It is necessary that the Commission continues to address the need for reliable statistical information that enables Union policies to better respond to economic, social and territorial realities at regional level.
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) A reliable procedure should be set up for the collection, compilation, monitoring and release of the data relevant for the macroeconomic imbalances procedure (hereinafter referred to as “MIP relevant data”) as well as a continuous improvement of the underlying statistical information in line with the Commission’s quality management frameworks for European statistics4. The Group of Directors of Macroeconomic Statistics (DMES), established by the Commission and including in its ranks experts from the European Statistical System Committee and the European System of Central Banks, is an appropriate expert group to provide the Commission (Eurostat) with the required assistance for the application of a robust quality monitoring procedure for the MIP relevant data.
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) It is essential that the statistical production necessary for the performance of the activities of the Union should only be based on reliable data. In the production of MIP relevant data, which is an essential input for the detection of macroeconomic imbalances as well as the prevention and correction of excessive macroeconomic imbalances within the Union, unreliable data can have a significant impact on the interest of the Union. Additional measures to make the enforcement of the production, provision and quality monitoring of MIP relevant data more effective are necessary for the performance of the macroeconomic imbalances procedure. Those measures should enhance the credibility of the underlying statistical information as well as of the provision and quality monitoring of the MIP relevant data.
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) It is essential that the statistical production necessary for the performance of the activities of the Union should only be based on reliable data. In the production of MIP relevant data, which is an essential input for the detection of macroeconomic imbalances as well as the prevention and correction of excessive macroeconomic imbalances within the Union, unreliable data can have a significant impact on the interest of the Union. Additional measures to make the enforcement of the production, provision and quality monitoring of MIP relevant data more effective are necessary for the performance of the macroeconomic imbalances procedure. Those measures should enhance the credibility of the underlying statistical information as well as of the provision and quality monitoring of the MIP relevant data. In order to deter against misrepresentation, whether intentional or due to serious negligence, of MIP relevant data, a mechanism of financial sanctions applied to the Eurozone Member States should be established, which will also serve the purpose of ensuring due diligence in the production of MIP relevant data.
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Close cooperation and on-going dialogue should be established between the Commission and Member States’ statistical authorities in order to ensure the quality and accuracy of the MIP relevant data reported by Member States and the underlying statistical information. The scope of the data that will be linked to the MIP must be precisely defined.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 a (new) (8a) The establishment of a legal framework for 'Commitments on Confidence in Statistics' should be encouraged. Compliance with the data confidentiality rule within the ESS (European Statistical System), as well as with the principle of subsidiarity, will help to increase trust in statistical agencies.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) In order to ensure thorough, accurate and high-quality data, a system for researching the socio-economic processes taking place in cross-border regions should be set up, and statistics should be drawn up for macro-regions in order to obtain a reliable, full and accurate economic picture of regional and macro-regional development in both urban and rural areas.
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) The implementation of European and Structural (ESI) Funds is, according to Regulation (EU) n° .../2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006, linked to sound economic governance and to the Macroeconomic Imbalances Procedure among others.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 b (new) (12b) In particular, Article 23(1) of Regulation (EU) No .../2013 provides that the Commission may request a Member State to review and propose amendments to its Partnership Agreement and relevant programmes, where this is necessary to support the implementation of relevant Council Recommendations addressed to the Member State concerned and adopted in accordance with Articles 7(2) or 8(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011 on the prevention and correction of macro- economic imbalances, provided that these amendments are deemed necessary to help correct the macroeconomic imbalances.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 c (new) (12c) Article 23(9) and Annex III of Regulation (EU) No .../2013 also provides that the Commission is to make a proposal to the Council to suspend part or all of the commitments or payments for the programmes of a Member State where the Council adopts two successive recommendations in the same imbalance procedure, in accordance with Article 8(3) or Article 10(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011 on the prevention and correction of macro-economic imbalances.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 d (new) (12d) However, the suspension of funds due to be triggered by the macroeconomic imbalances procedure should be used as a last resort and take into account an in- depth analyses of the unemployment, poverty and GDP contraction indicators.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 e (new) (12e) For the purpose of effectiveness, this Regulation should cover all statistical data that are required within the scope of the macroeconomic imbalances procedure.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation lays down the rules on the provision and quality monitoring of data, including statistical data, which are compiled or transmitted for the purpose of the procedures for the detection of macroeconomic imbalances as well as the prevention and correction of excessive macroeconomic imbalances within the Union established under Articles 3 to 11 of Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011 (hereinafter referred to as the MIP relevant data).
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. MIP relevant data shall be the subject of a certificate issued by the higher audit institution of the Member State concerned regarding the quality of the information provided by it.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall indicate to the Member States, each year, the timetable of the annual Alert Mechanism Report established by Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011. Based on this timetable and on the deadlines and calendars referred to in paragraph 2, the Commission shall also
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall adopt
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. In the event of doubt regarding the correct implementation of the rules governing the compilation and transmission of the MIP relevant data, the Member State concerned shall request clarification from the Commission (Eurostat). The Commission shall promptly examine the issue and communicate its
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall establish the inventories and send them to the Commission (Eurostat) at the latest on […][nine months after the adoption of this Regulation– exact date to be inserted by OP upon publication]. The Commission shall adopt
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall make their inventories public within one month of their submission to the Commission.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission (Eurostat) shall report to the Economic Policy Committee set up by Council Decision 74/122/EEC7 and to the European Parliament on the findings of these missions, including any comments on these findings made by the Member State concerned. After having been transmitted to the Economic Policy Committee and European Parliament, these reports, along with any comments made by the Member State concerned, shall be made public, without prejudice to the provisions concerning statistical confidentiality in Regulation (EC) No 223/2009. _______________ 7 OJ L 63, 05.03.74, p. 21. JO L 63 du 5.3.1974, p. 21.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission (Eurostat) shall lay down the rules and procedures related to the selection of the experts
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission (Eurostat) may express a reservation on the quality of a Member State's MIP relevant data. No later than
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission (Eurostat) may amend data transmitted by Member States and provide the amended data and a justification of the amendment where there is evidence that the data reported by Member States do not comply with the requirements of Article 3(2). No later than t
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The Council, acting on a proposal by the Commission, may decide to impose a fine on a Eurozone Member State that intentionally or by serious negligence misrepresents the MIP relevant data.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. The fine referred to in paragraph 1 shall be effective, dissuasive and proportionate to the nature, seriousness and duration of the misrepresentation. The amount of the fine shall not exceed 0.0
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. The fine referred to in paragraph 1 shall be effective, dissuasive and proportionate to the nature, seriousness and duration of the misrepresentation. The amount of the fine shall not exceed 0.025% of the GDP of the Member State concerned.
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new) Member States under procedure of suspension of European Funds in accordance with paragraph 5 of Article 21 of Regulation (EU) No. .../2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 shall be imposed a reduced fine taking into account the scope of suspension.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 5 Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 3 Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 5 Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2011 on the prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances1
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Reliable, thorough, accurate and useful statistical data are the basis for effective surveillance of macroeconomic imbalances. To guarantee sound and independent statistics, Member States
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Reliable statistical data are
source: PE-524.765
2013/12/13
ECON
66 amendments...
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 1 Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 338(1) and Article 121(6) thereof,
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Regulation (EU) No 1174/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2011 on enforcement measures to correct excessive macroeconomic imbalances in the euro area2 lays down a
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Reliable statistical data are the basis for effective surveillance of macroeconomic imbalances. To guarantee sound and independent statistics, the independance of Eurostat should be strenghtened in line with the European Parliament's proposals for the revision of regulation (EC) No 223/2009 and Member States should ensure the professional independence of national statistical authorities, consistent with the European statistics code of practice laid down in Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 on European statistics3 . __________________ 3 OJ L 87, 31.3.2009, p. 164 OJ L 87, 31.3.2009, p. 164
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The AMR, which is based on a scoreboard with a set of indicators the values of which are compared to their indicative thresholds, is an initial screening device whereby the Commission identifies Member States where it considers that developments warrant further in-depth analysis to determine whether imbalances exist or risk emerging. The AMR should include MIP relevant data. It is however in the following in-depth reviews that the
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) It is essential that the statistical production necessary for the performance of the activities of the Union should only be based on reliable data. In the production of MIP relevant data, which is an essential input for the detection of macroeconomic imbalances as well as the prevention and correction of excessive macroeconomic imbalances within the Union, unreliable data can have a significant impact on the interest of the Union. Additional measures to make the enforcement of the production, provision and quality monitoring of MIP relevant data more effective are necessary for the performance of the macroeconomic imbalances procedure. Those measures should enhance the credibility of the underlying statistical information as well as of the provision and quality monitoring of the MIP relevant data. In order to deter against misrepresentation, whether intentional or due to serious negligence, of MIP relevant data, a
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) It is essential that the statistical production necessary for the performance of the activities of the Union is
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) To s
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Close cooperation and
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) Close cooperation between the European Statistical System and the European System of Central Banks should be ensured in relation to MIP relevant data, in line with Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 223/2009, in order to minimise the reporting burden, guarantee coherence, improve the underlying statistics and ensure comparability. Practical operational arrangements for the cooperation between the ESS and the ESCB on quality assurance for statistical data for the MIP could be laid down in a memorandum of understanding. Given its long-standing experience in the areas of statistics covered by the MIP relevant data, the Committee on Monetary, Financial and Balance of Payments Statistics (CMFB) established by the Council Decision 2006/856/EC could provide advice on the practical operational arrangements for cooperation that could be reflected in such a memorandum of understanding.'
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9a) The strengthening of economic governance through an improved statistical monitoring system of MIP relevant data should include a closer and more timely involvement of the European Parliament and the national parliaments. While recognising that the counterparts of the European Parliament in the framework of the dialogue are the relevant institutions of the Union and their representatives, the competent committee of the European Parliament may extend invitations to representatives of the National Statistical Institutes (NSIs) to voluntarily participate in hearings.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) The provisions laid out in this Regulation are to be considered within the frame of the reinforcement of european economic governance, which calls for greater democratic accountability at both national and european levels;
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Quality assurance procedures put in place in the framework of this Regulation shall build on and take into consideration best practices in existing quality assurance procedures. They shall not result in the duplication of quality assurance efforts nor parallel data series.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 2. The deadlines for the transmission of the MIP relevant data shall be those laid down pursuant to the relevant basic acts or shall be communicated by the Commission in specific calendars taking into account the European Semester framework and the needs of the Union.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Member States shall transmit the quality report within 7 days as referred to in Art. 2 (3a)
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall adopt
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts with a view to defining the modalities, structure and periodicity of the quality reports referred to in paragraph 1. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 14(2).
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall establish the inventories and send them to the Commission (Eurostat) at the latest on […][nine months after the adoption of this Regulation– exact date to be inserted by OP upon publication]. The Commission shall adopt
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. Where the Commission (Eurostat) identifies problems, in particular in the context of the quality assessment under Article 5, it may decide to carry out
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. Where the Commission (Eurostat) identifies problems, in particular in the context of the quality assessment under Article 5, it may decide to carry out enquiry missions to the Member State concerned.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. The aim of such
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. The aim of such enquiry missions shall be to investigate in depth the quality of the MIP relevant data concerned. The enquiry missions shall concentrate on methodological issues, the sources and methods described in the inventories, the data and supporting statistical processes with a view to assessing their compliance with the relevant accounting and statistical rules. The Commission (Eurostat) may, in order to carry out its enquiry, perform on- site visits at the premices of MIP relevant data producers, including NSI, national ministries and national central banks;
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission (Eurostat) shall report to the Economic Policy Committee set up by Council Decision 74/122/EEC7 on the findings of these missions, including any comments on these findings made by the Member State concerned. After having been transmitted to the Economic Policy Committee, these reports, along with any comments made by the Member State concerned, shall be transmitted to the European Parliament and made public, without prejudice to the provisions concerning statistical confidentiality in Regulation (EC) No 223/2009. __________________ 7 OJ L 63, 5.3.1974, p.21
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission (Eurostat) shall report to the relevant committee of the European Parliament and to the Economic Policy Committee set up by Council Decision 74/122/EEC7 on the findings of these
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission (Eurostat) shall report to the European Parliament and the Economic Policy Committee set up by Council Decision 74/122/EEC7 on the findings of these enquiry missions, including any comments on these findings made by the Member State concerned. After having been transmitted to the Economic Policy Committee, these reports, along with any comments made by the Member State concerned, shall be made public, without prejudice to the provisions concerning statistical confidentiality in Regulation (EC) No 223/2009. __________________ 7 OJ L 63, 5.3.1974, p.21 OJ L 63, 5.3.1974, p.21
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall, at the request of the Commission (Eurostat), provide the assistance from experts on statistical issues related to the macroeconomic imbalances procedure, including for the preparation and carrying-out of the
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall, at the request of the Commission (Eurostat), provide the assistance from experts on statistical issues related to the macroeconomic imbalances procedure, including for the preparation and carrying-out of the enquiry missions. In the exercise of their duties, these experts shall provide independent expertise. A list of those experts shall be constituted by (date to be fixed) on the basis of proposals sent to the Commission (Eurostat) by the
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission (Eurostat) shall
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission (Eurostat) may express a reservation on the quality of a Member State's MIP relevant data. No later than t
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission (Eurostat) may amend data transmitted by Member States and
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter 8 – title SANCTIONS CONCERNING THE MANIPULATION OF STATISTICS AND STATISTICAL DATA
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The Council, acting on a proposal by the Commission, may decide to impose a fine on a Member State that acts intentionally
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The Council, acting on a
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The Council, acting on a proposal by the Commission, may
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The Council, acting on a proposal by the Commission, may decide
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. The fine referred to in paragraph 1 shall be effective, dissuasive and proportionate to the nature, seriousness and duration of the misrepresentation. The amount of the fine shall not exceed 0.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. The
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. The interest-bearing deposit or fine referred to in paragraph 1 shall be effective, dissuasive and proportionate to the nature, seriousness and duration of the misrepresentation. The amount of the fine shall not exceed 0.05% of the GDP of the Member State concerned.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Upon completion of its investigation, and before submitting any proposal to the Council, the Commission shall give the Member State concerned the opportunity of being heard in relation to the matters under investigation. The Commission shall base any proposal to the Council only on facts on which the Member State concerned has had the opportunity to comment. The competent committee of the European Parliament may offer a Member State which is the subject of a Commission proposal an opportunity to participate in an exchange of views.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Upon completion of its investigation, and before submitting any
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 a (new) The Commission shall inform the competent Committee of the European Parliament of any investigation or recommendation made pursuant to this paragraph.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. A fine shall be imposed by a Council decision, acting on a recommendation from the Commission, if a Council decision establishing intentional misrepresentation of MIP relevant data or serious negligence is adopted in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Regulation;
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. The fine referred to in paragraph 3a shall amount to 0.01% of the GDP in the preceding year of the Member State concerned;
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. The Commission's recommendation for a Council decision to impose a fine shall be issued within 20 days of the conditions referred to in paragraph 1 being met.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 d (new) 3d. By derogation from paragraph 3b (new), the Commission may, on grounds of exceptional economic circumstances or following a reasoned request by the Member State concerned addressed to the Commission within 10 days of the conditions referred to in paragraph 1 being met, propose to reduce or cancel the annual fine.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 – point a Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 – point a (a) detailed criteria establishing the amount of the
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 – point c (c) detailed rules of procedure aimed at guaranteeing the rights of the defence, access to the file, legal representation, confidentiality and provisions as to timing and the collection of the
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 5 5. The Court of Justice of the European Union shall have unlimited jurisdiction to review the decisions of the Council imposing
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 a (new) Article 9a Interest-bearing deposit Interest-bearing deposit 1. The Commission may, following a reasonded request by the Member State concerned adressed to the Commission recommend that the Council reduce the amount of the interest-bearing deposit or cancel it. 2. The inerest-bearing deposit shall bear an interest rate reflecting the Commission's credit risk and the relevant investment period.
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter 9 – title NATURE
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Articles 3(3), 6(2) and 9(4) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of t
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 9(4) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of three years starting after one month following the adoption of this Regulation. The Commission shall, after consultation of the relevent actors including the ECB in line with Article 127 of the TFEU, draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power not later than nine months before the end of that 3-
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 3 3. The delegation of power referred to in Articles 3(3), 6(2) and 9(4) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 5 5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Articles 3(3), 6(2) and 9(4) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of t
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 5 5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 9(4) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of t
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 For the measures referred to in Article 9 the Council shall act without taking into account the vote of the member of the Council representing the Member State concerned. The decision referred to in Article 9 (1) shall be deemed to be adopted by the Council unless the Council decides, by a qualified majority, to reject the recommendation within 10 days of its adoption by the Commission.
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 For the measures referred to in Article 9 the Council shall act without taking into account the vote of the member of the Council representing the Member State concerned. A qualified majority of the members of the Council referred to in article 9 paragraph 1 shall be defined in accordance with point (a) of Article 238(3) TFEU.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 In line with Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 223/2009, the national statistical institutes of the Member States (the NSI) shall ensure the required coordination on the MIP relevant data at national level. All other national authorities shall report to and cooperate with the NSI for this purpose. National authorities producing data shall be held responsible for it. The Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure the application of this provision.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 The Commission (Eurostat) shall report regularly and at least annually to the European Parliament and to the Council on the activities carried out by the Commission (Eurostat) for the purpose of implementing this Regulationin the context of the European Semester as referred to in Regulation (EU) No 1175/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) the effectiveness and the proportionality of this Regulation and the applied monitoring process.
source: PE-523.047
2013/12/18
EMPL
18 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 a (new) (4a) The inclusion of a number of (auxiliary) employment and social indicators in the Alert Mechanism Report is foreseen. This Regulation should also apply to these indicators.
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) It is essential that the statistical production necessary for
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) Close cooperation and on-going dialogue to coordinate and harmonise data to be transmitted should be established between the Commission and Member States' statistical authorities in order to ensure the quality of the MIP relevant data reported by Member States and the underlying statistical information.
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9a) The strengthening of economic governance through an improved statistical monitoring system of MIP relevant data should include a closer and more timely involvement of the European Parliament and the national parliaments.
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. When
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 In the event of doubt regarding the correct implementation of the rules governing the compilation and transmission of the MIP relevant data, the Member State concerned shall request clarification from the Commission (Eurostat). The Commission shall promptly examine the issue and communicate its clarification to the Member State concerned, to the relevant expert groups on macroeconomic and social statistics established by the Commission, to all other Member States and to the public.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. Where the Commission (Eurostat) identifies problems or potential issues as to the quality of statistics, in particular in the context of the quality assessment under Article 5, it may decide to carry out missions to the Member State concerned.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission (Eurostat) shall report to the Economic Policy Committee set up by Council Decision 74/122/EEC7 on the findings of these missions, including any comments on these findings made by the Member State concerned. After having been transmitted to the Economic Policy Committee and the European Parliament, these reports, along with any comments made by the Member State concerned, shall be made public, without prejudice to the provisions concerning statistical confidentiality in Regulation (EC) No 223/2009. __________________ 7 OJ L 63, 5.3.1974, p.21
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission (Eurostat) shall report to the Economic Policy Committee set up by Council Decision 74/122/EEC7 on the findings of these missions, including any comments on these findings made by the Member State concerned. After having
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission (Eurostat) may express a reservation on the quality of a Member State's MIP relevant data. No later than
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission (Eurostat) may amend data transmitted by Member States and provide the amended data and a justification of the amendment where there is evidence that the data reported by Member States do not comply with the requirements of Article 3(2). No later than
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter 8 – title SANCTIONS CONCERNING THE M
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. The Council, acting on a proposal by the Commission, may decide to impose a fine on a Member State that intentionally or by serious negligence misrepresents or delays the delivery of the MIP relevant data.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 5 5. The Court of Justice of the European Union shall have unlimited jurisdiction to review the decisions of the Council imposing fines under paragraph 1.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 The fines collected in accordance with Article 9 shall constitute other revenue, as referred to in Article 311 of the Treaty, and shall be assigned to the Union budget. They shall be designated for measures to enhance employment and education levels especially among the youth.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 In line with Article 5 of Regulation (EC)
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3)
source: PE-526.157
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| committees/0/rapporteur |
|
| committees/0/shadows |
|
| committees/2/rapporteur |
|
| committees/5/rapporteur |
|
| committees/0/date |
|
| committees/1/date |
|
| committees/1/rapporteur/0/date |
2014-07-22T00:00:00
|
| committees/2/date |
|
| committees/3/date |
|
| committees/4/date |
|
| committees/5/date |
|
| committees/6/date |
|
| committees/7/date |
|
| committees/7/rapporteur/0/date |
2013-06-20T00:00:00
|
| committees/7/rapporteur/1/date |
2013-06-20T00:00:00
|
| committees/8/date |
|
| activities |
|
| commission |
|
| committees/0/associated |
False
|
| committees/0/date |
Old
2014-07-22T00:00:00New
|
| committees/0/rapporteur |
|
| committees/0/responsible |
True
|
| committees/0/shadows |
|
| committees/0/type |
Responsible Committee
|
| committees/1/associated |
False
|
| committees/1/date |
Old
2013-06-18T00:00:00New
|
| committees/1/rapporteur/0 |
|
| committees/1/rapporteur/0 |
|
| committees/1/responsible |
True
|
| committees/1/type |
Former Responsible Committee
|
| committees/2/associated |
False
|
| committees/2/committee |
Old
EMPLNew
ECON |
| committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Employment and Social AffairsNew
Economic and Monetary Affairs |
| committees/2/date |
|
| committees/2/responsible |
False
|
| committees/2/type |
Former Responsible Committee
|
| committees/3/associated |
False
|
| committees/3/date |
Old
2013-07-03T00:00:00New
|
| committees/3/rapporteur |
|
| committees/3/responsible |
False
|
| committees/3/type |
Committee Opinion
|
| committees/4/associated |
False
|
| committees/4/date |
|
| committees/4/responsible |
False
|
| committees/4/type |
Committee Opinion
|
| committees/5/associated |
False
|
| committees/5/committee |
Old
REGINew
EMPL |
| committees/5/committee_full |
Old
Regional DevelopmentNew
Employment and Social Affairs |
| committees/5/date/0 |
2013-06-20T00:00:00
|
| committees/5/date/1 |
2013-06-20T00:00:00
|
| committees/5/rapporteur |
|
| committees/5/responsible |
False
|
| committees/5/type |
Former Committee Opinion
|
| committees/6 |
|
| committees/7 |
|
| committees/8 |
|
| council |
|
| docs |
|
| events |
|
| other |
|
| procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
| procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ECON/8/00179New
|
| procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
| procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
| procedure/summary |
|
| activities/6/council |
Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN
|
| activities/6/docs |
|
| activities/6/meeting_id |
3468
|
| activities/6/type |
Old
Debate in CouncilNew
Council Meeting |
| procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
| activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013PC0342:EN
|
| activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013PC0342:EN
|
| activities/6/council |
Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN
|
| activities/6/docs |
|
| activities/6/meeting_id |
3468
|
| activities/6/type |
Old
Council MeetingNew
Debate in Council |
| activities/5 |
|
| activities/0/commission/0/DG/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/economy_finance/index_en.htmNew
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/economic-and-financial-affairs_en |
| other/0/dg/url |
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/economy_finance/index_en.htmNew
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/economic-and-financial-affairs_en |
| activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=342New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2013/0342/COM_COM(2013)0342_EN.doc |
| activities/7 |
|
| activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013PC0342:EN
|
| activities/3 |
|
| activities/5 |
|
| activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013PC0342:EN
|
| activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013PC0342:EN
|
| activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013PC0342:EN
|
| links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
| activities/0/commission/0/Commissioner |
Old
REHN OlliNew
MOSCOVICI Pierre |
| other/0/commissioner |
Old
REHN OlliNew
MOSCOVICI Pierre |
| activities/4 |
|
| activities/1/committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
| activities/2/committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
| committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
| activities/1/committees/0/date |
2014-07-22T00:00:00
|
| activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
| activities/1/committees/0/shadows |
|
| activities/2/committees/0/date |
2014-07-22T00:00:00
|
| activities/2/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
| activities/2/committees/0/shadows |
|
| committees/0/date |
2014-07-22T00:00:00
|
| committees/0/rapporteur |
|
| committees/0/shadows |
|
| activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de184830fb8127435bdbda4New
4f1ac7c9b819f25efd0000ac |
| activities/1/committees/3/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de183180fb8127435bdbb94New
4f1ac652b819f25efd000032 |
| activities/1/committees/5/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de185260fb8127435bdbe95New
4f1ac84db819f25efd0000dd |
| activities/1/committees/5/rapporteur/1/mepref |
Old
4de186d60fb8127435bdc0f9New
4f1ad95bb819f207b3000011 |
| activities/2/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de184830fb8127435bdbda4New
4f1ac7c9b819f25efd0000ac |
| activities/2/committees/3/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de183180fb8127435bdbb94New
4f1ac652b819f25efd000032 |
| activities/2/committees/5/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de185260fb8127435bdbe95New
4f1ac84db819f25efd0000dd |
| activities/2/committees/5/rapporteur/1/mepref |
Old
4de186d60fb8127435bdc0f9New
4f1ad95bb819f207b3000011 |
| committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de184830fb8127435bdbda4New
4f1ac7c9b819f25efd0000ac |
| committees/3/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de183180fb8127435bdbb94New
4f1ac652b819f25efd000032 |
| committees/5/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de185260fb8127435bdbe95New
4f1ac84db819f25efd0000dd |
| committees/5/rapporteur/1/mepref |
Old
4de186d60fb8127435bdc0f9New
4f1ad95bb819f207b3000011 |
| activities/1/committees/1 |
|
| activities/1/committees/3 |
|
| activities/1/committees/5 |
|
| activities/2/committees/1 |
|
| activities/2/committees/3 |
|
| activities/2/committees/5 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/3 |
|
| committees/5 |
|
| activities/1 |
|
| activities/1/committees/0/date |
2013-06-18T00:00:00
|
| activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
| activities/1/committees/0/shadows |
|
| activities/1/committees/1/date |
2013-07-03T00:00:00
|
| activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
| activities/1/committees/2/date |
2013-06-20T00:00:00
|
| activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur |
|
| activities/1/date |
Old
2014-02-13T00:00:00New
2013-06-13T00:00:00 |
| activities/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
| activities/2/committees/0/date |
2013-06-18T00:00:00
|
| activities/2/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
| activities/2/committees/0/shadows |
|
| activities/2/committees/1/date |
2013-07-03T00:00:00
|
| activities/2/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
| activities/2/committees/2/date |
2013-06-20T00:00:00
|
| activities/2/committees/2/rapporteur |
|
| activities/3/docs/0 |
|
| activities/3/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
| committees/0/date |
2013-06-18T00:00:00
|
| committees/0/rapporteur |
|
| committees/0/shadows |
|
| committees/1/date |
2013-07-03T00:00:00
|
| committees/1/rapporteur |
|
| committees/2/date |
2013-06-20T00:00:00
|
| committees/2/rapporteur |
|
| procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
| procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ECON/7/12975New
ECON/8/00179 |
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting committee decision |
| activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://old.eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=342New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=342 |
| activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=342New
http://old.eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=342 |
| activities/4/docs/0/text |
|
| activities/3/docs/0/text |
|
| activities/4/docs |
|
| activities/4/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
| activities/3/docs |
|
| activities/4/date |
Old
2014-03-12T00:00:00New
2014-03-11T00:00:00 |
| activities/4/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in plenary scheduled |
| activities/3 |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
| activities/2/committees |
|
| activities/2/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
| activities/3/date |
Old
2014-04-02T00:00:00New
2014-03-12T00:00:00 |
| activities/0 |
|
| activities/0/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
| activities/0/commission |
|
| activities/0/date |
Old
2013-11-07T00:00:00New
2013-06-07T00:00:00 |
| activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013PC0342:EN
|
| activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
| activities/0/docs/0/title |
Old
PE522.929New
COM(2013)0342 |
| activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
Legislative proposal published |
| activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE522.929New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2013&nu_doc=342 |
| activities/0/type |
Old
Committee draft reportNew
Legislative proposal published |
| activities/3 |
|
| activities/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE523.047
|
| activities/3 |
|
| activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013PC0342:EN
|
| activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013PC0342:EN
|
| activities/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE522.929
|
| activities/2 |
|
| activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de186d60fb8127435bdc0f9New
4de185260fb8127435bdbe95 |
| activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
MĂNESCU Ramona NicoleNew
GODMANIS Ivars |
| committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de186d60fb8127435bdc0f9New
4de185260fb8127435bdbe95 |
| committees/2/rapporteur/0/name |
Old
MĂNESCU Ramona NicoleNew
GODMANIS Ivars |
| activities/1/committees/1/date |
2013-07-03T00:00:00
|
| activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
| committees/1/date |
2013-07-03T00:00:00
|
| committees/1/rapporteur |
|
| activities/3 |
|
| activities/1/committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
| activities/2 |
|
| committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
| activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
| committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
| activities/1/committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
| activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
| committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
| committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
| activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
| activities/1/committees/0/shadows |
|
| committees/0/shadows |
|
| activities/1/committees/0/date |
2013-06-18T00:00:00
|
| activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
| committees/0/date |
2013-06-18T00:00:00
|
| committees/0/rapporteur |
|
| activities/1/committees/2/date |
2013-06-20T00:00:00
|
| activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur |
|
| committees/2/date |
2013-06-20T00:00:00
|
| committees/2/rapporteur |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting committee decision |
| activities |
|
| committees |
|
| links |
|
| other |
|
| procedure |
|