Next event: Commission response to text adopted in plenary 2014/07/22 more...
- Results of vote in Parliament 2014/02/26
- Decision by Parliament 2014/02/26
- End of procedure in Parliament 2014/02/26
- Committee report tabled for plenary 2014/02/03
- Vote in committee 2014/01/22
- Committee opinion 2013/12/17
- Amendments tabled in committee 2013/12/03
- Committee opinion 2013/11/27
Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | REGI | SAVISAAR-TOOMAST Vilja ( ALDE) | DEUTSCH Tamás ( PPE), NILSSON Jens ( S&D), ALFONSI François ( Verts/ALE), RÜHLE Heide ( Verts/ALE), VLASÁK Oldřich ( ECR), KURSKI Jacek Olgierd ( EFD) |
Committee Opinion | FEMM | BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ Vilija ( S&D) | |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | EMPL | KÓSA Ádám ( PPE) | Marian HARKIN ( ALDE), Patrick LE HYARIC ( GUE/NGL) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Events
The European Parliament adopted a resolution on the European Commission’s 7th and 8th progress reports on the EU Cohesion Policy and the Strategic Report 2013 on programme implementation 2007-2013.
Cohesion policy in the context of a crisis : empirical evidence shows that the economic, financial and social crisis has brought the convergence process to a halt or has even reversed it, thus aggravating disparities between regions. Public resources both at Member State and EU level have become scarcer. The crisis is adversely affecting all European regions and cities, thus increasing the importance of cohesion policy funding.
The resolution noted that the emphasis of cohesion policy has up until now rather been on absorption than on defining and monitoring – and evaluating the achievement of – objectives, while the monitoring and evaluation systems fail to fully achieve their purpose of improving the definition of differentiated targets according to the local, regional and interregional features, specificities and needs.
Cohesion policy continues to be the main source of EU public funding in the context of the multiannual financial framework 2014-2020, and within the new framework for the cohesion policy all the emphasis is placed on the need to concentrate investment at regional and local level in important areas such as job creation, SMEs, training and education, urban development and cities.
General implementation challenges for the current programming period : welcoming the seventh and eighth progress reports, as well as the strategic report 2013, Parliament called on the Commission – which is now launching the 2007-2013 ex-post evaluation – and Member States to ensure that the monitoring and evaluation are based on reliable data, to look at the efficiency, effectiveness and impact of operations, and to ensure that the ex-post evaluation is completed by the end of 2015, in order for clear lessons to be drawn with a view to the implementation of the new programming period.
Members expressed concern over the lack of sufficient public financial resources , in particular at sub-national level, to implement the Europe 2020 Strategy adequately, owing to the impact of the economic crisis.
Although the resources allocated to cohesion policy in the current multiannual financial framework are relatively small as compared to the needs on the ground, Parliament felt that ensuring greater efficiency as well as synergies between the EU budget and the national budgets might nevertheless constitute important levers for growth-enhancing policies.
Further action must be taken to reinforce the territorial dimension of the governance system of cohesion policy, the Europe 2020 strategy and the European Semester.
Focus on employment and social inclusion : Parliament noted that, owing to the crisis, the percentage of the population at risk of poverty or social exclusion, suffering of material deprivation, environmental degradation and poor housing conditions, or having very low work intensity and threatened by energy poverty has increased considerably.
Employment rates have remained well below the Europe 2020 target of having at least 75 % of the population aged 20–64 in employment by 2020. Employment in some regions remains below 60 % and that some regions are missing their national targets by a factor of 20-25 %. The European Social Fund ( ESF ) should play a role in reducing the disparities in human capital among regions and in helping to increase employment rates.
The importance of the Youth Guarantee is also underlined.
Evaluation evidence : while there is strong evidence that implementation of cohesion policy has accelerated, a number of Member States are at risk of failing to implement their programmes before the end of the current programming period. Parliament urged the Commission, to analyse the low absorption rates , and urged the Member States to provide co-financing in order to accelerate the implementation of funds . Member States should also explore synergies between cohesion policy financing and other sources of EU funding as well as with financing provided by the European Investment Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. They were also urged to accelerate implementation and to improve access to the funds in order to encourage SMEs, civil society organisations, local municipalities and other interested beneficiaries to make use of them.
Monitoring and evaluation challenges : Members considered that evaluation has an essential role to play in the policy debate and learning, but are concerned that the uneven quality of progress reporting in many cases makes it difficult to develop a full and accurate picture of progress towards the targets at regional and local level . They emphasised that evaluation should also assess and propose measures to relieve unnecessary burdens on beneficiaries, including SMEs, local and regional authorities and NGOs.
In this respect, the Commission and the Member States are asked to make full use of the monitoring and evaluation tools available in the context of the current legislative framework (stronger result orientation, use of common output indicators, choice of programme-specific result indicators and a clear performance framework).
The Commission is urged to:
improve Member States’ reporting systems by introducing and utilising indicators so as to make it possible to assess the support provided under cohesion policy for genuine progress on gender equality; check whether Managing Authorities apply the Late Payment Directive in relation with beneficiaries of projects and take adequate measures to decrease the payments’ delays .
The Committee on Regional Development adopted the own-initiative report by Vilja SAVISAAR-TOOMAST (ALDE, EE) on the European Commission’s 7th and 8th progress reports on the EU Cohesion Policy and the Strategic Report 2013 on programme implementation 2007-2013.
Empirical evidence shows that the economic, financial and social crisis has brought the convergence process to a halt or has even reversed it, thus aggravating disparities between regions. Public resources both at Member State and EU level have become scarcer. The crisis is adversely affecting all European regions and cities, thus increasing the importance of cohesion policy funding.
The report noted that the emphasis of cohesion policy has up until now rather been on absorption than on defining and monitoring – and evaluating the achievement of – objectives, while the monitoring and evaluation systems fail to fully achieve their purpose of improving the definition of differentiated targets according to the local, regional and interregional features, specificities and needs.
The cohesion policy continues to be the main source of EU public funding in the context of the multiannual financial framework 2014-2020, and within the new framework for the cohesion policy all the emphasis is placed on the need to concentrate investment at regional and local level in important areas such as job creation, SMEs, training and education, urban development and cities.
General implementation challenges for the current programming period : the report welcomed the seventh and eighth progress reports, as well as the strategic report 2013, and called on the Commission – which is now launching the 2007-2013 ex-post evaluation – and the Member States to ensure that the monitoring and evaluation are based on reliable data, to look at the efficiency, effectiveness and impact of operations, and to ensure that the ex-post evaluation is completed by the end of 2015, in order for clear lessons to be drawn with a view to the implementation of the new programming period.
Members stated that, although the resources allocated to cohesion policy in the current multiannual financial framework are relatively small as compared to the needs on the ground, ensuring greater efficiency as well as synergies between the EU budget and the national budgets may nevertheless constitute important levers for growth-enhancing policies.
Further action must be taken to reinforce the territorial dimension of the governance system of cohesion policy, the Europe 2020 strategy and the European Semester.
Focus on employment and social inclusion : the report noted that, owing to the crisis, the percentage of the population at risk of poverty or social exclusion, suffering of material deprivation, environmental degradation and poor housing conditions, or having very low work intensity and threatened by exclusion and energy poverty has increased considerably. The European Social Fund ( ESF ) should play a role in reducing the disparities in human capital among regions and in helping to increase employment rates.
Evaluation evidence : the report recalled that while there is strong evidence that implementation of cohesion policy has accelerated, a number of Member States are at risk of failing to implement their programmes before the end of the current programming period. It urged the Commission, in this regard, to analyse in depth the causes of the low absorption rates , and urged the Member States to provide co-financing in order to accelerate the implementation of funds . Member States should also explore synergies between cohesion policy financing and other sources of EU funding as well as with financing provided by the European Investment Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. They were also urged to accelerate implementation and to simplify and improve access to the funds available in order to encourage SMEs, civil society organisations, local municipalities and other interested beneficiaries to make use of them.
Monitoring and evaluation challenges : Members considered that evaluation has an essential role to play in the policy debate and learning, but are concerned that the uneven quality of progress reporting in many cases makes it difficult to develop a full and accurate picture of progress towards the targets at regional and local level . They emphasised that evaluation should also assess and propose measures to relieve unnecessary burdens on beneficiaries, including SMEs, local and regional authorities and NGOs.
In this respect, the Commission and the Member States are asked to make full use of the monitoring and evaluation tools available in the context of the current legislative framework (stronger result orientation, use of common output indicators, choice of programme-specific result indicators and a clear performance framework).
The Commission is urged to improve Member States’ reporting systems by introducing and utilising indicators so as to make it possible to assess the support provided under cohesion policy for genuine progress on gender equality and to what extent this is being achieved. It is also urged to check whether Managing Authorities apply the Late Payment Directive in relation with beneficiaries of projects and take adequate measures to decrease the payments’ delays .
PURPOSE: Commissions progress report on economic, social and territorial cohesion.
CONTENT: cohesion policy is a key delivery mechanism for Europe 2020. This progress report assesses how, in the context of cohesion policy, regions and cities can contribute to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth of the Europe 2020 strategy. It measures the distance of cities and regions to the national 2020 targets proposed in the national reform programmes. Smart growth : the convergence regions score poorly on smart growth with low levels of R&D, low productivity and low shares of higher educated. With regard to the latter, only one in five EU regions has reached the target to increase the share of people aged 30-34 with a tertiary degree to 40% by 2020. Member States have set themselves targets ranging from 26% to 60%. The regions eligible under the regional competitiveness and employment (RCE) objective score the best with (1 in 3), the transition regions score average (1 in 4), while the convergence regions score poorly (1 in 20).
R&D is typically concentrated in core areas such as capital and metropolitan regions. In 2008, expenditure exceeded the Europe 2020 target in 24 out of 159 RCE regions, but only in one out of 84 convergence regions and not in a single transition region. On average R&D expenditure of the convergence regions is only 0.9% of their GDP.
Sustainable growth : the challenge of sustainable growth is present in all regions. With respect to the need to reduce emissions, the report stresses that the energy efficiency of existing and new buildings must increase everywhere. Regions can play a prominent role in fostering energy efficiency and this is particularly true as regards buildings, where actions must adapt to the local context and climate.
The report also notes that regional characteristics directly determine the extent to which EU regions can produce renewable energy such as solar and wind energy. Moving renewable energy between regions with a high potential to regions with a high demand will require the development of better and more intelligent energy networks. Increasing renewable energy will require more investment in efficient locations and in the network connecting supply with demand.
Inclusive growth : many convergence regions display low levels of employment and high unemployment levels. The employment rate in convergence regions in 2010 was only 63% after a decline due to the economic crisis. Only two convergence regions have reached the EU target of 75% in 2010. If the goal were to reach the 2020 target in all convergence regions, 11 million people would have to find a job.
The risk of poverty and exclusion is also higher in the convergence regions.
Although transition regions and RCE regions score better on these issues, they also need to improve their performance to reach the Europe 2020 targets. The crisis has reduced employment in RCE regions and revealed a lack of competitiveness in some of them. Unemployment has risen in more than 100 RCE regions and 36 have an unemployment rate above the EU average.
The report notes that cohesion policy programmes should select their investment priorities taking into account the starting position of a region or city in relation to the national 2020 targets and identify the concentrations to promote and the ones to fight. Cohesion policy programmes provide an opportunity to design strategies in an integrated way — focused on the specific needs of each territory — and reflect the trade-offs and synergies between different types of investments.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)447
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0132/2014
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0081/2014
- Committee opinion: PE522.835
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE524.733
- Committee opinion: PE519.793
- Committee draft report: PE523.085
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2011)0776
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE523.085
- Committee opinion: PE519.793
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE524.733
- Committee opinion: PE522.835
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)447
Amendments | Dossier |
20 |
2013/2008(INI)
2013/10/24
EMPL
20 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the seventh and eighth progress reports and calls on the Commission to examine, in the sixth Cohesion Report in 2014, the long-term impact of the steadily decreasing cohesion between Europe's countries and regions as a result of the economic crisis and the measures which must be taken to reduce the gap, in particular cohesion between programme and non-programme counties;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Stresses that the employment situation of young people is highly dependent on the overall economic situation and consequently the importance of support, guidance and monitoring of young people in their move from education to professional life is pertinent; the Commission could therefore align any future policy proposals in this area with the 'Youth on the Move' and 'Youth Opportunities' initiatives;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that employment in some regions remains below 60 % and that some regions are missing their national targets by a factor of 20-25 %, which is having a particularly adverse effect on young people, women, old people and people with disabilities;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that employment in some regions remains below 60 % and that some regions are missing their national targets by a factor of 20-25 %, which is having a particularly adverse effect on young people, women, older people, carers and people with disabilities; keeping such people in employment requires special measures, particularly as unemployment has been a feature of some isolated settlements for generations, and this poses a particular threat to marginalised communities;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Reminds that the employment rates remained well below the Europe 2020 target, to have at least 75 % of the population aged 20–64 in employment by 2020; notes that while there are no specific employment rate targets at a regional level , EU Member States have set, individually, national targets which in most cases have not been met, as the financial and economic crisis had a strong asymmetric impact on regional labour markets, predominantly, of Southern Europe with a remarkable increase of youth unemployment;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Underlines the inequalities recorded between the highest regional employment rates in the EU in northern and central Europe, particularly in Germany, the Netherlands, Austria, Sweden and the United Kingdom and the lowest regional employment rates in the southern regions of Spain, Italy, Greece, Hungary, Cyprus and Portugal;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises with regard to the
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises with regard to the ‘urban paradox’ that the number of families on the brink of poverty, suffering material deprivation, having very low work intensity and threatened by exclusion – primarily single-parent families, carers
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises with regard to the ‘urban paradox’ that the number of families on the brink of poverty, suffering material deprivation, having very low work intensity and threatened by exclusion – primarily single-parent families,
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Highlights that knowledge exchange with cooperation practices for development and growth between regional and local authorities of Member States, could help to overcome the gap in terms of expertise and raise awareness for employment mobility purposes; moreover, decentralisation and territorial development should be further supported as effective ways to overcome the current unemployment crisis.
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Addressing the issue of promoting development of democracy at local and regional level, which requires from the EU to have a stronger political commitment on the endorsement of an enabling environment which could strengthen local and regional actors capacities to influence and monitor job creation and social inclusion of their populations; to this end, the diversity of civil society could play a key role through the involvement of social partners in the process of reaching the EU target for inclusive growth.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Stress that GDP should remain one of the main criteria for determining eligibility for regional policy assistance, but that this must be complemented by other indicators for identification of the most vulnerable regions; underlines that GDP alone does not have the capacity to provide a comprehensive picture of regional development and social cohesion as it fails to take account of relevant social factors such as income disparities and unemployment.
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4 c. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to increase investment in the areas of entrepreneurship, business- start-ups and self-employment as a means of creating more jobs, in particular since SMEs and microenterprises provide over two thirds of the EU's private sector jobs; special emphasis should be paid to the regional and local level; in addition, investment in social business and social entrepreneurship provides a good additional option to meet social needs not satisfied by public goods and services.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Encourages the Commission to support specific measures for the creation of more and sustainable jobs, for investment in regional and local development education, for the encouragement of local entrepreneurship and the creation of new financial instruments for all kinds of businesses and especially of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in order to combat increasing levels of unemployment , poverty and social exclusion;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. Acknowledges that a large part of ESF's (European social fund)expenditure is allocated in promoting more and better jobs, in supporting integration and participation of disadvantaged groups, and in the developing of an inclusive society accessible to all; stresses however, that at times of crisis, more emphasis should be paid that the European social fund (ESF) is efficiently targeted to combat local and regional inequalities and social exclusion; to give access to employment to the most vulnerable groups and young in particular and to assist women's re-integration into the labour market, by reducing gender-based segregation.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that the high proportion of early school-leavers in some regions is significantly above the target of 10 % and that early school-leavers must receive an offer answering their needs, be it education, training or work; refers in this context to the importance of the Youth Guarantee for early-school leavers; stresses that in order to reduce the number of early school leavers is it important that the education system is inclusive, offering equal chances to all young people; stresses that a solution must
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that the high proportion of early school-leavers in some regions is significantly above the target of 10 % and that a solution must therefore be found to the problem of integrating poorly-trained young people into the labour market, by providing accessible and quality vocational and in-work training to help them aquire marketable skills, taking into account the fact that the lack of qualifications leads to unemployment, which in turn results in poverty and involves a multitude of social challenges linked to exclusion, alienation and the failed efforts in building an independent life;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that the high proportion of early school-leavers in some regions is significantly above the target of 10 % and that a solution must therefore be found to the problem of integrating poorly-trained young people into the labour market, taking into account the fact that the lack of qualifications leads to unemployment, which in turn results in poverty; to this end, ESF contribution is crucial, in helping more young people to stay at school and acquire the appropriate qualifications needed for a job and career and in ensuring wider access to high- quality education with special projects for children from disadvantaged groups and minorities.
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that the high proportion of early school-leavers in some regions is significantly above the target of 10 % and that a solution must therefore be found to the problem of integrating poorly-trained young people into the labour market, taking into account the fact that the lack of qualifications leads to unemployment, which in turn results in poverty, calls on Member States to encourage appropriate vocational and on the job training for those who will benefit from it;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Calls on the Commission and the Member-States to adopt growth-friendly policies, including the prioritisation of spending in the areas of education, life- long learning, research and innovation, because austerity measures alone are not sufficient to combat the current economic crisis;
source: PE-522.820
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE523.085New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-PR-523085_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE519.793&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AD-519793_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE524.733New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AM-524733_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE522.835&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-522835_EN.html |
events/0/docs/1/url |
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=0776New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=776 |
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/date |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
docs/4/body |
EC
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0081&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2014-0081_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2014-0132New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2014-0132_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
REGI/7/11646New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/title |
Old
European Commission's seventh and eight progress reports on the EU Cohesion Policy and the 2013 strategic report on programme implementation 2007-2013New
European Commission's seventh and eight progress reports on the EU cohesion policy and the 2013 strategic report on programme implementation 2007-2013 |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0776:EN
|
activities/0/commission/0/DG/title |
Old
Regional PolicyNew
Regional and Urban Policy |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0776:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0776/COM_COM(2011)0776_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0776/COM_COM(2011)0776_EN.pdf |
other/0/dg/title |
Old
Regional PolicyNew
Regional and Urban Policy |
procedure/subject/1 |
Old
4.70.02 Cohesion, Cohesion FundNew
4.70.02 Cohesion policy, Cohesion Fund |
activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1837e0fb8127435bdbc28New
4f1ac66ab819f25efd00003c |
activities/1/committees/4/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1889c0fb8127435bdc383New
4f1adb18b819f207b30000a8 |
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de184620fb8127435bdbd78New
4f1ac79cb819f25efd000099 |
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de182e10fb8127435bdbb47New
4f1ac5dcb819f25efd000006 |
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
4de187ec0fb8127435bdc27cNew
4f1adaefb819f207b300009b |
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
4de1893a0fb8127435bdc457New
4f1adc6eb819f207b3000119 |
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/5/mepref |
Old
4de1860e0fb8127435bdbfd6New
4f1ad223b819f27595000009 |
activities/1/date |
Old
2014-01-22T00:00:00New
2013-01-17T00:00:00 |
activities/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/2/committees |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2014-02-26T00:00:00New
2014-01-22T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/4/committees |
|
activities/4/date |
Old
2013-01-17T00:00:00New
2014-02-26T00:00:00 |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1837e0fb8127435bdbc28New
4f1ac66ab819f25efd00003c |
committees/4/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1889c0fb8127435bdc383New
4f1adb18b819f207b30000a8 |
committees/4/shadows/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/4/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de184620fb8127435bdbd78New
4f1ac79cb819f25efd000099 |
committees/4/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de182e10fb8127435bdbb47New
4f1ac5dcb819f25efd000006 |
committees/4/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
4de187ec0fb8127435bdc27cNew
4f1adaefb819f207b300009b |
committees/4/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
4de1893a0fb8127435bdc457New
4f1adc6eb819f207b3000119 |
committees/4/shadows/5/mepref |
Old
4de1860e0fb8127435bdbfd6New
4f1ad223b819f27595000009 |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052 |
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/3/docs/0/text |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
Old
CELEX:52011PC0776:ENNew
CELEX:52011DC0776:EN |
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
Old
CELEX:52011DC0776:ENNew
CELEX:52011PC0776:EN |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in plenary scheduled |
activities/4/date |
Old
2014-02-25T00:00:00New
2014-02-26T00:00:00 |
activities/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/2 |
|
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/4 |
|
activities/1/committees/4/shadows/5 |
|
activities/2/committees/4/shadows/2 |
|
activities/2/committees/4/shadows/4 |
|
activities/2/committees/4/shadows/5 |
|
committees/4/shadows/2 |
|
committees/4/shadows/4 |
|
committees/4/shadows/5 |
|
activities/2 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
activities/0 |
|
activities/0/body |
Old
EPNew
EC |
activities/0/commission |
|
activities/0/date |
Old
2013-12-03T00:00:00New
2011-11-24T00:00:00 |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0776:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/0/docs/0/title |
Old
PE524.733New
COM(2011)0776 |
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Non-legislative basic document published |
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE524.733New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0776/COM_COM(2011)0776_EN.pdf |
activities/0/type |
Old
Amendments tabled in committeeNew
Non-legislative basic document published |
activities/2 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
Old
CELEX:52011PC0776:ENNew
CELEX:52011DC0776:EN |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
Old
CELEX:52011DC0776:ENNew
CELEX:52011PC0776:EN |
activities/3/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE524.733
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0776:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0776:EN
|
activities/1/committees/0/date |
2013-07-03T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/3 |
|
committees/0/date |
2013-07-03T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/2/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE523.085
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/2 |
|
procedure/title |
Old
European Commission's seventh progress report on the EU Cohesion PolicyNew
European Commission's seventh and eight progress reports on the EU Cohesion Policy and the 2013 strategic report on programme implementation 2007-2013 |
activities/1/committees/0/date |
2013-07-03T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/date |
2013-07-03T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityNew
Women's Rights and Gender Equality |
committees/2/committee_full |
Old
Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityNew
Women's Rights and Gender Equality |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1/committees/2/date |
2013-03-14T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/date |
2013-03-14T00:00:00
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/4/date |
2012-03-19T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/4/rapporteur |
|
activities/1/committees/4/shadows |
|
committees/4/date |
2012-03-19T00:00:00
|
committees/4/rapporteur |
|
committees/4/shadows |
|
activities/1/committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|