BETA


2013/2023(INI) Improving private international law: jurisdiction rules applicable to employment

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead JURI REGNER Evelyn (icon: S&D S&D)
Committee Opinion EMPL OOMEN-RUIJTEN Ria (icon: PPE PPE) Thomas HÄNDEL (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2014/03/06
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2013/10/08
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2013/10/08
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution on improving private international law: jurisdiction rules applicable to employment.

Parliament recalled that it is a major concern of private international law at European level to prevent forum shopping – particularly when this might occur to the detriment of the weaker party, such as employees in particular – and to ensure the greatest possible level of predictability as to jurisdiction. It also recalled that a number of high-profile European court cases on jurisdiction and applicable law in relation to individual employment contracts and industrial action have led to fears that national provisions on employment law could be undermined by European rules which can lead, in certain cases, to the law of one Member State being applied by the court of another Member State. In view of the major importance of employment law for the constitutional and political identities of the Member States, it is important that European law should respect national traditions in this field.

It is also in the interest of the proper administration of justice to align the rules on jurisdiction with the rules on applicable law to the extent possible.

In this regard, it seemed appropriate to evaluate whether there is a need for changes to be made to the rules on jurisdiction in the field of employment law. Parliament congratulated the institutions on the successful review of the Brussels I Regulation and considered that employment law issues should be further addressed by the Commission with a view to a possible future revision.

Parliament noted that one of the main principles of private international law relating to jurisdiction is the protection of the weaker party and that the objective of employee protection is spelt out in the current jurisdiction rules .

Employees are generally well protected by jurisdiction rules in employment matters when they are defendants in cases brought by their employers through the exclusive grounds of jurisdiction laid down in the Brussels I Regulation.

Parliament urged the Commission to assess whether the current legal framework under the Brussels I Regulation sufficiently takes into account the specificities of actions in the employment sector.

The Commission is also called upon to pay particular attention to the following issues:

whether, concerning the liability of a worker or an employer or of an organisation representing the professional interests of workers or employers for damages caused by industrial action, any steps need to be taken to clarify that Article 7(2) of the recast Brussels I Regulation refers to the place where the industrial action is to be or has been taken , and whether alignment with Article 9 of the Rome II Regulation is necessary; whether, in cases where an employee sues an employer, the fall-back clause which applies where there is no habitual place of work should be reworded so as to refer to the place of business from which the employee receives or received day-to-day instructions rather than to the engaging place of business.

Documents
2013/10/08
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2013/10/07
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2013/09/20
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Legal Affairs unanimously adopted the own-initiative report by Evelyn REGNER (S&D, AT) on improving private international law: jurisdiction rules applicable to employment.

Members recalled that a number of high-profile European court cases on jurisdiction and applicable law in relation to individual employment contracts and industrial action have led to fears that national provisions on employment law could be undermined by European rules which can lead, in certain cases, to the law of one Member State being applied by the court of another Member State.

It is also a major concern of private international law at European level to prevent forum shopping – particularly when this might occur to the detriment of the weaker party, such as employees in particular – and to ensure the greatest possible level of predictability as to jurisdiction.

It is therefore important that European law should respect national traditions in this field.

Whilst congratulating the institutions on the successful review of the Brussels I Regulation , Members considered that employment law issues should be further addressed by the Commission with a view to a possible future revision.

Members noted that one of the main principles of private international law relating to jurisdiction is the protection of the weaker party and that the objective of employee protection is spelt out in the current jurisdiction rules .

Employees are generally well protected by jurisdiction rules in employment matters when they are defendants in cases brought by their employers through the exclusive grounds of jurisdiction laid down in the Brussels I Regulation.

The committee urged the Commission to assess whether the current legal framework under the Brussels I Regulation sufficiently takes into account the specificities of actions in the employment sector.

The Commission is also called upon to pay particular attention to the following issues:

whether, concerning the liability of a worker or an employer or of an organisation representing the professional interests of workers or employers for damages caused by industrial action, any steps need to be taken to clarify that Article 7(2) of the recast Brussels I Regulation refers to the place where the industrial action is to be or has been taken , and whether alignment with Article 9 of the Rome II Regulation is necessary; whether, in cases where an employee sues an employer, the fall-back clause which applies where there is no habitual place of work should be reworded so as to refer to the place of business from which the employee receives or received day-to-day instructions rather than to the engaging place of business.

Documents
2013/09/17
   EP - Vote in committee
2013/09/05
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2013/06/17
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2013/05/08
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2013/03/11
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2013/02/20
   EP - REGNER Evelyn (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in JURI
2013/01/17
   EP - OOMEN-RUIJTEN Ria (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in EMPL

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
21 2013/2023(INI)
2013/06/17 EMPL 21 amendments...
source: PE-514.567

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE508.078
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-PR-508078_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE513.236
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AM-513236_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE510.701&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AD-510701_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2013-09-20T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0291_EN.html title: A7-0291/2013
summary
events/2
date
2013-09-20T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0291_EN.html title: A7-0291/2013
summary
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131007&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2013-10-07-TOC_EN.html
events/5
date
2013-10-08T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0396_EN.html title: T7-0396/2013
summary
events/5
date
2013-10-08T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0396_EN.html title: T7-0396/2013
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: REGNER Evelyn date: 2013-02-20T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2013-02-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: REGNER Evelyn group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
rapporteur
name: OOMEN-RUIJTEN Ria date: 2013-01-17T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2013-01-17T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: OOMEN-RUIJTEN Ria group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
docs/3/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-291&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0291_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-396
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0396_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2013-03-11T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2013-01-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: OOMEN-RUIJTEN Ria body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2013-02-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: REGNER Evelyn
  • date: 2013-09-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2013-01-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: OOMEN-RUIJTEN Ria body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2013-02-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: REGNER Evelyn
  • date: 2013-09-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-291&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0291/2013 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2013-10-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131007&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2013-10-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23426&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-396 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0396/2013 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Justice and Consumers commissioner: REDING Viviane
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2013-02-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: REGNER Evelyn group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
EMPL
date
2013-01-17T00:00:00
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE name: OOMEN-RUIJTEN Ria
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2013-01-17T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: OOMEN-RUIJTEN Ria group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
JURI
date
2013-02-20T00:00:00
committee_full
Legal Affairs
rapporteur
group: S&D name: REGNER Evelyn
docs
  • date: 2013-05-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE508.078 title: PE508.078 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2013-06-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE513.236 title: PE513.236 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2013-09-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE510.701&secondRef=02 title: PE510.701 committee: EMPL type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2014-03-06T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=23426&j=0&l=en title: SP(2014)61 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2013-03-11T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-09-17T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-09-20T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-291&language=EN title: A7-0291/2013 summary: The Committee on Legal Affairs unanimously adopted the own-initiative report by Evelyn REGNER (S&D, AT) on improving private international law: jurisdiction rules applicable to employment. Members recalled that a number of high-profile European court cases on jurisdiction and applicable law in relation to individual employment contracts and industrial action have led to fears that national provisions on employment law could be undermined by European rules which can lead, in certain cases, to the law of one Member State being applied by the court of another Member State. It is also a major concern of private international law at European level to prevent forum shopping – particularly when this might occur to the detriment of the weaker party, such as employees in particular – and to ensure the greatest possible level of predictability as to jurisdiction. It is therefore important that European law should respect national traditions in this field. Whilst congratulating the institutions on the successful review of the Brussels I Regulation , Members considered that employment law issues should be further addressed by the Commission with a view to a possible future revision. Members noted that one of the main principles of private international law relating to jurisdiction is the protection of the weaker party and that the objective of employee protection is spelt out in the current jurisdiction rules . Employees are generally well protected by jurisdiction rules in employment matters when they are defendants in cases brought by their employers through the exclusive grounds of jurisdiction laid down in the Brussels I Regulation. The committee urged the Commission to assess whether the current legal framework under the Brussels I Regulation sufficiently takes into account the specificities of actions in the employment sector. The Commission is also called upon to pay particular attention to the following issues: whether, concerning the liability of a worker or an employer or of an organisation representing the professional interests of workers or employers for damages caused by industrial action, any steps need to be taken to clarify that Article 7(2) of the recast Brussels I Regulation refers to the place where the industrial action is to be or has been taken , and whether alignment with Article 9 of the Rome II Regulation is necessary; whether, in cases where an employee sues an employer, the fall-back clause which applies where there is no habitual place of work should be reworded so as to refer to the place of business from which the employee receives or received day-to-day instructions rather than to the engaging place of business.
  • date: 2013-10-07T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131007&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2013-10-08T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23426&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2013-10-08T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-396 title: T7-0396/2013 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution on improving private international law: jurisdiction rules applicable to employment. Parliament recalled that it is a major concern of private international law at European level to prevent forum shopping – particularly when this might occur to the detriment of the weaker party, such as employees in particular – and to ensure the greatest possible level of predictability as to jurisdiction. It also recalled that a number of high-profile European court cases on jurisdiction and applicable law in relation to individual employment contracts and industrial action have led to fears that national provisions on employment law could be undermined by European rules which can lead, in certain cases, to the law of one Member State being applied by the court of another Member State. In view of the major importance of employment law for the constitutional and political identities of the Member States, it is important that European law should respect national traditions in this field. It is also in the interest of the proper administration of justice to align the rules on jurisdiction with the rules on applicable law to the extent possible. In this regard, it seemed appropriate to evaluate whether there is a need for changes to be made to the rules on jurisdiction in the field of employment law. Parliament congratulated the institutions on the successful review of the Brussels I Regulation and considered that employment law issues should be further addressed by the Commission with a view to a possible future revision. Parliament noted that one of the main principles of private international law relating to jurisdiction is the protection of the weaker party and that the objective of employee protection is spelt out in the current jurisdiction rules . Employees are generally well protected by jurisdiction rules in employment matters when they are defendants in cases brought by their employers through the exclusive grounds of jurisdiction laid down in the Brussels I Regulation. Parliament urged the Commission to assess whether the current legal framework under the Brussels I Regulation sufficiently takes into account the specificities of actions in the employment sector. The Commission is also called upon to pay particular attention to the following issues: whether, concerning the liability of a worker or an employer or of an organisation representing the professional interests of workers or employers for damages caused by industrial action, any steps need to be taken to clarify that Article 7(2) of the recast Brussels I Regulation refers to the place where the industrial action is to be or has been taken , and whether alignment with Article 9 of the Rome II Regulation is necessary; whether, in cases where an employee sues an employer, the fall-back clause which applies where there is no habitual place of work should be reworded so as to refer to the place of business from which the employee receives or received day-to-day instructions rather than to the engaging place of business.
  • date: 2013-10-08T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice commissioner: REDING Viviane
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
JURI/7/11935
New
  • JURI/7/11935
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.15.12 Workers protection and rights, labour law
  • 7.40.02 Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters
New
4.15.12
Workers protection and rights, labour law
7.40.02
Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters
activities/0
date
2013-03-11T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/0/committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2013-01-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: OOMEN-RUIJTEN Ria
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2013-02-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: REGNER Evelyn
activities/0/date
Old
2013-06-17T00:00:00
New
2013-03-11T00:00:00
activities/0/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE513.236 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE513.236
activities/0/type
Old
Amendments tabled in committee
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
activities/1/committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2013-01-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: OOMEN-RUIJTEN Ria
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2013-02-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: REGNER Evelyn
activities/1/date
Old
2013-05-08T00:00:00
New
2013-09-17T00:00:00
activities/1/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE508.078 type: Committee draft report title: PE508.078
activities/1/type
Old
Committee draft report
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/3
date
2013-09-17T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=[%EY][%m][%d]&type=CRE
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131007&type=CRE
activities/4/docs/0
url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23426&l=en
type
Results of vote in Parliament
title
Results of vote in Parliament
activities/4/docs/1/text
  • The European Parliament adopted a resolution on improving private international law: jurisdiction rules applicable to employment.

    Parliament recalled that it is a major concern of private international law at European level to prevent forum shopping – particularly when this might occur to the detriment of the weaker party, such as employees in particular – and to ensure the greatest possible level of predictability as to jurisdiction. It also recalled that a number of high-profile European court cases on jurisdiction and applicable law in relation to individual employment contracts and industrial action have led to fears that national provisions on employment law could be undermined by European rules which can lead, in certain cases, to the law of one Member State being applied by the court of another Member State. In view of the major importance of employment law for the constitutional and political identities of the Member States, it is important that European law should respect national traditions in this field.

    It is also in the interest of the proper administration of justice to align the rules on jurisdiction with the rules on applicable law to the extent possible.

    In this regard, it seemed appropriate to evaluate whether there is a need for changes to be made to the rules on jurisdiction in the field of employment law. Parliament congratulated the institutions on the successful review of the Brussels I Regulation and considered that employment law issues should be further addressed by the Commission with a view to a possible future revision.

    Parliament noted that one of the main principles of private international law relating to jurisdiction is the protection of the weaker party and that the objective of employee protection is spelt out in the current jurisdiction rules.

    Employees are generally well protected by jurisdiction rules in employment matters when they are defendants in cases brought by their employers through the exclusive grounds of jurisdiction laid down in the Brussels I Regulation.

    Parliament urged the Commission to assess whether the current legal framework under the Brussels I Regulation sufficiently takes into account the specificities of actions in the employment sector.

    The Commission is also called upon to pay particular attention to the following issues:

    • whether, concerning the liability of a worker or an employer or of an organisation representing the professional interests of workers or employers for damages caused by industrial action, any steps need to be taken to clarify that Article 7(2) of the recast Brussels I Regulation refers to the place where the industrial action is to be or has been taken, and whether alignment with Article 9 of the Rome II Regulation is necessary;
    • whether, in cases where an employee sues an employer, the fall-back clause which applies where there is no habitual place of work should be reworded so as to refer to the place of business from which the employee receives or received day-to-day instructions rather than to the engaging place of business.
activities/4/type
Old
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
New
Results of vote in Parliament
committees/0/rapporteur/0/group
Old
EPP
New
PPE
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de1872b0fb8127435bdc168
New
4f1ada1db819f207b3000053
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de187fe0fb8127435bdc298
New
4f1adaa9b819f207b3000083
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
procedure/legal_basis/0
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048
New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
activities/4/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Legal Affairs unanimously adopted the own-initiative report by Evelyn REGNER (S&D, AT) on improving private international law: jurisdiction rules applicable to employment.

    Members recalled that a number of high-profile European court cases on jurisdiction and applicable law in relation to individual employment contracts and industrial action have led to fears that national provisions on employment law could be undermined by European rules which can lead, in certain cases, to the law of one Member State being applied by the court of another Member State.

    It is also a major concern of private international law at European level to prevent forum shopping – particularly when this might occur to the detriment of the weaker party, such as employees in particular – and to ensure the greatest possible level of predictability as to jurisdiction.

    It is therefore important that European law should respect national traditions in this field.

    Whilst congratulating the institutions on the successful review of the Brussels I Regulation, Members considered that employment law issues should be further addressed by the Commission with a view to a possible future revision.

    Members noted that one of the main principles of private international law relating to jurisdiction is the protection of the weaker party and that the objective of employee protection is spelt out in the current jurisdiction rules.

    Employees are generally well protected by jurisdiction rules in employment matters when they are defendants in cases brought by their employers through the exclusive grounds of jurisdiction laid down in the Brussels I Regulation.

    The committee urged the Commission to assess whether the current legal framework under the Brussels I Regulation sufficiently takes into account the specificities of actions in the employment sector.

    The Commission is also called upon to pay particular attention to the following issues:

    • whether, concerning the liability of a worker or an employer or of an organisation representing the professional interests of workers or employers for damages caused by industrial action, any steps need to be taken to clarify that Article 7(2) of the recast Brussels I Regulation refers to the place where the industrial action is to be or has been taken, and whether alignment with Article 9 of the Rome II Regulation is necessary;
    • whether, in cases where an employee sues an employer, the fall-back clause which applies where there is no habitual place of work should be reworded so as to refer to the place of business from which the employee receives or received day-to-day instructions rather than to the engaging place of business.
activities/5/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=[%EY][%m][%d]&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/5/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/6/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-396 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0396/2013
activities/6/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/4/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Legal Affairs unanimously adopted the own-initiative report by Evelyn REGNER (S&D, AT) on improving private international law: jurisdiction rules applicable to employment.

    Members recalled that a number of high-profile European court cases on jurisdiction and applicable law in relation to individual employment contracts and industrial action have led to fears that national provisions on employment law could be undermined by European rules which can lead, in certain cases, to the law of one Member State being applied by the court of another Member State.

    It is also a major concern of private international law at European level to prevent forum shopping – particularly when this might occur to the detriment of the weaker party, such as employees in particular – and to ensure the greatest possible level of predictability as to jurisdiction.

    It is therefore important that European law should respect national traditions in this field.

    Whilst congratulating the institutions on the successful review of the Brussels I Regulation, Members considered that employment law issues should be further addressed by the Commission with a view to a possible future revision.

    Members noted that one of the main principles of private international law relating to jurisdiction is the protection of the weaker party and that the objective of employee protection is spelt out in the current jurisdiction rules.

    Employees are generally well protected by jurisdiction rules in employment matters when they are defendants in cases brought by their employers through the exclusive grounds of jurisdiction laid down in the Brussels I Regulation.

    The committee urged the Commission to assess whether the current legal framework under the Brussels I Regulation sufficiently takes into account the specificities of actions in the employment sector.

    The Commission is also called upon to pay particular attention to the following issues:

    • whether, concerning the liability of a worker or an employer or of an organisation representing the professional interests of workers or employers for damages caused by industrial action, any steps need to be taken to clarify that Article 7(2) of the recast Brussels I Regulation refers to the place where the industrial action is to be or has been taken, and whether alignment with Article 9 of the Rome II Regulation is necessary;
    • whether, in cases where an employee sues an employer, the fall-back clause which applies where there is no habitual place of work should be reworded so as to refer to the place of business from which the employee receives or received day-to-day instructions rather than to the engaging place of business.
activities/4/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Legal Affairs unanimously adopted the own-initiative report by Evelyn REGNER (S&D, AT) on improving private international law: jurisdiction rules applicable to employment.

    Members recalled that a number of high-profile European court cases on jurisdiction and applicable law in relation to individual employment contracts and industrial action have led to fears that national provisions on employment law could be undermined by European rules which can lead, in certain cases, to the law of one Member State being applied by the court of another Member State.

    It is also a major concern of private international law at European level to prevent forum shopping – particularly when this might occur to the detriment of the weaker party, such as employees in particular – and to ensure the greatest possible level of predictability as to jurisdiction.

    It is therefore important that European law should respect national traditions in this field.

    Whilst congratulating the institutions on the successful review of the Brussels I Regulation, Members considered that employment law issues should be further addressed by the Commission with a view to a possible future revision.

    Members noted that one of the main principles of private international law relating to jurisdiction is the protection of the weaker party and that the objective of employee protection is spelt out in the current jurisdiction rules.

    Employees are generally well protected by jurisdiction rules in employment matters when they are defendants in cases brought by their employers through the exclusive grounds of jurisdiction laid down in the Brussels I Regulation.

    The committee urged the Commission to assess whether the current legal framework under the Brussels I Regulation sufficiently takes into account the specificities of actions in the employment sector.

    The Commission is also called upon to pay particular attention to the following issues:

    • whether, concerning the liability of a worker or an employer or of an organisation representing the professional interests of workers or employers for damages caused by industrial action, any steps need to be taken to clarify that Article 7(2) of the recast Brussels I Regulation refers to the place where the industrial action is to be or has been taken, and whether alignment with Article 9 of the Rome II Regulation is necessary;
    • whether, in cases where an employee sues an employer, the fall-back clause which applies where there is no habitual place of work should be reworded so as to refer to the place of business from which the employee receives or received day-to-day instructions rather than to the engaging place of business.
activities/4/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-291&language=EN
activities/3
date
2013-09-17T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/4
date
2013-09-20T00:00:00
docs
type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0291/2013
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/2
date
2013-06-17T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE513.236 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE513.236
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/2/date
Old
2013-09-20T00:00:00
New
2013-06-17T00:00:00
activities/2/docs/0/title
Old
A7-0291/2013
New
PE513.236
activities/2/docs/0/type
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
New
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/2/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE513.236
activities/2/type
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
New
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/3
date
2013-09-17T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities/3
date
2013-09-17T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/4
date
2013-09-20T00:00:00
docs
type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0291/2013
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/2
date
2013-06-17T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE513.236 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE513.236
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/2/committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2013-01-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: OOMEN-RUIJTEN Ria
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2013-02-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: REGNER Evelyn
activities/2/date
Old
2013-09-17T00:00:00
New
2013-06-17T00:00:00
activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE513.236 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE513.236
activities/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Amendments tabled in committee
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
activities/3
date
2013-09-17T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
activities/3
date
2013-10-07T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/4/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/2/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE513.236
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities/2/date
Old
2013-06-06T00:00:00
New
2013-06-17T00:00:00
procedure/subject/0
4.15.12 Workers protection and rights, labour law
activities/2
date
2013-06-06T00:00:00
docs
type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE513.236
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/0/committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
EMPL
date
2013-01-17T00:00:00
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
rapporteur
group: EPP name: OOMEN-RUIJTEN Ria
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
EMPL
date
2013-01-17T00:00:00
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
rapporteur
group: EPP name: OOMEN-RUIJTEN Ria
activities/1/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE508.078
activities/1
date
2013-05-08T00:00:00
docs
type: Committee draft report title: PE508.078
body
EP
type
Committee draft report
activities/1/date
Old
2013-09-09T00:00:00
New
2013-10-08T00:00:00
activities/1
date
2013-09-09T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities
  • date: 2013-03-11T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2013-02-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: REGNER Evelyn
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2013-02-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: S&D name: REGNER Evelyn
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/ title: Justice commissioner: REDING Viviane
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
JURI/7/11935
reference
2013/2023(INI)
title
Improving private international law: jurisdiction rules applicable to employment
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048
stage_reached
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
7.40.02 Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters