{"change_dates":[],"dossier":{"amendments":[{"authors":"Elmar Brok, Ana Gomes, Ioan Mircea Pa\u015fcu, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Ulrike Lunacek, Jos\u00e9 Ignacio Salafranca S\u00e1nchez-Neyra","changes":{},"committee":["AFCO"],"date":"2014-02-20T00:00:00","id":"PE529.818-4","location":[["Parliament's Rules of Procedure","Rule 90 \u2013 paragraph 4"]],"meps":[1263,28306,33984,1946,97017,2002],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:53:32"},"new":["4. At any stage of the negotiations and","from the end of the negotiations to the","conclusion of the agreement, Parliament","may, on the basis of a report from the","committee responsible, and after","considering any relevant proposal tabled","pursuant to Rule 121, adopt","recommendations and require them to be","taken into account before the conclusion of","the international agreement under","consideration."],"old":["4. At any stage of the negotiations","Parliament may, on the basis of a report","from the committee responsible, and after","considering any relevant proposal tabled","pursuant to Rule 121, adopt","recommendations and require them to be","taken into account before the conclusion of","the international agreement under","consideration."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE529.818v01-00","reference":"2013/2259(REG)","seq":"4","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-529.818+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Stanimir Ilchev","changes":{},"committee":["AFCO"],"date":"2014-02-20T00:00:00","id":"PE529.818-5","location":[["Parliament's Rules of Procedure","Rule 90 \u2013 paragraph 5"]],"meps":[34235],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:53:32"},"new":["5. When the negotiations are completed,","but before any agreement is signed, the","draft Council's decision concluding the","agreement shall be submitted to Parliament","for its opinion or consent. In the case of the","consent procedure Rule 81 shall apply."],"old":["5. When the negotiations are completed,","but before any agreement is signed, the","draft agreement shall be submitted to","Parliament for its opinion or consent. In the","case of the consent procedure Rule 81 shall","apply."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE529.818v01-00","reference":"2013/2259(REG)","seq":"5","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-529.818+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"},{"authors":"Stanimir Ilchev","changes":{},"committee":["AFCO"],"date":"2014-02-20T00:00:00","id":"PE529.818-6","location":[[" Parliament's Rules of Procedure","Rule 90 \u2013 paragraph 6"]],"meps":[34235],"meta":{"created":"2019-07-03T05:53:32"},"new":["6. Before the vote on the consent or on the","opinion is taken, the committee","responsible, a political group or at least","one-tenth of the Members may propose","that Parliament seek an opinion from the","Court of Justice on the compatibility of an","international agreement with the Treaties.","If Parliament approves such a proposal, the","vote shall be adjourned until the Court has","delivered its opinion."],"old":["6. Before the vote on the consent is taken,","the committee responsible, a political","group or at least one-tenth of the Members","may propose that Parliament seek an","opinion from the Court of Justice on the","compatibility of an international agreement","with the Treaties. If Parliament approves","such a proposal, the vote on the consent","shall be adjourned until the Court has","delivered its opinion."],"orig_lang":"en","peid":"PE529.818v01-00","reference":"2013/2259(REG)","seq":"6","src":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-529.818+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN"}],"changes":{"2014-03-18T18:19:37":[{"data":[{"body":"EP","committees":[{"body":"EP","committee":"AFCO","committee_full":"Constitutional Affairs","date":"2013-10-14T00:00:00","rapporteur":[{"group":"S&D","mepref":"4de1867c0fb8127435bdc074","name":"MARTIN David"}],"responsible":true,"shadows":[{"group":"EPP","mepref":"51d2126ab819f23b5b000002","name":"BU\u0160I\u0106 Zdravka"},{"group":"ALDE","mepref":"4de1858a0fb8127435bdbf19","name":"ILCHEV Stanimir"},{"group":"Verts/ALE","mepref":"4de1856e0fb8127435bdbefa","name":"H\u00c4FNER Gerald"},{"group":"ECR","mepref":"4de184c70fb8127435bdbe09","name":"FOX Ashley"},{"group":"GUE/NGL","mepref":"4de1889e0fb8127435bdc386","name":"SCHOLZ Helmut"},{"group":"EFD","mepref":"4de186fd0fb8127435bdc12a","name":"MESSERSCHMIDT Morten"}]}],"date":"2014-03-13T00:00:00","type":"Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading"},{"body":"EP","date":"2014-04-16T00:00:00","type":"Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading"}],"path":["activities"],"type":"added"},{"data":[],"path":["other"],"type":"added"},{"data":[{"body":"EP","committee":"AFCO","committee_full":"Constitutional Affairs","date":"2013-10-14T00:00:00","rapporteur":[{"group":"S&D","mepref":"4de1867c0fb8127435bdc074","name":"MARTIN David"}],"responsible":true,"shadows":[{"group":"EPP","mepref":"51d2126ab819f23b5b000002","name":"BU\u0160I\u0106 Zdravka"},{"group":"ALDE","mepref":"4de1858a0fb8127435bdbf19","name":"ILCHEV Stanimir"},{"group":"Verts/ALE","mepref":"4de1856e0fb8127435bdbefa","name":"H\u00c4FNER Gerald"},{"group":"ECR","mepref":"4de184c70fb8127435bdbe09","name":"FOX Ashley"},{"group":"GUE/NGL","mepref":"4de1889e0fb8127435bdc386","name":"SCHOLZ Helmut"},{"group":"EFD","mepref":"4de186fd0fb8127435bdc12a","name":"MESSERSCHMIDT Morten"}]}],"path":["committees"],"type":"added"},{"data":{},"path":["links"],"type":"added"},{"data":{"dossier_of_the_committee":"AFCO/7/14050","legal_basis":["Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 211","Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 212-p1"],"reference":"2013/2259(REG)","stage_reached":"Awaiting committee decision","subject":["8.40.01.08 Business of Parliament, procedure, sittings, rules of procedure"],"subtype":"Rules","title":"EP Rules of Procedure, Rule 90: international agreements","type":"REG - Parliament's Rules of Procedure"},"path":["procedure"],"type":"added"}],"2014-03-20T03:53:30":[{"data":{"body":"EP","committees":[{"body":"EP","committee":"AFCO","committee_full":"Constitutional Affairs","date":"2013-10-14T00:00:00","rapporteur":[{"group":"S&D","mepref":"4de1867c0fb8127435bdc074","name":"MARTIN David"}],"responsible":true,"shadows":[{"group":"EPP","mepref":"51d2126ab819f23b5b000002","name":"BU\u0160I\u0106 Zdravka"},{"group":"ALDE","mepref":"4de1858a0fb8127435bdbf19","name":"ILCHEV Stanimir"},{"group":"Verts/ALE","mepref":"4de1856e0fb8127435bdbefa","name":"H\u00c4FNER Gerald"},{"group":"ECR","mepref":"4de184c70fb8127435bdbe09","name":"FOX Ashley"},{"group":"GUE/NGL","mepref":"4de1889e0fb8127435bdc386","name":"SCHOLZ Helmut"},{"group":"EFD","mepref":"4de186fd0fb8127435bdc12a","name":"MESSERSCHMIDT Morten"}]}],"date":"2014-03-18T00:00:00","type":"Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading"},"path":["activities",1],"type":"added"}],"2014-03-26T04:09:38":[{"data":{"body":"EP","date":"2014-03-25T00:00:00","type":"Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading"},"path":["activities",2],"type":"added"},{"data":["Awaiting committee decision","Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage"],"path":["procedure","stage_reached"],"type":"changed"}],"2014-03-27T04:04:56":[{"data":["2014-03-25T00:00:00","2014-03-26T00:00:00"],"path":["activities",2,"date"],"type":"changed"}],"2014-04-05T03:15:59":[{"data":["Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading","Vote in plenary scheduled"],"path":["activities",3,"type"],"type":"changed"},{"data":[{"title":"A7-0253/2014","type":"Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading","url":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2014-0253&language=EN"}],"path":["activities",2,"docs"],"type":"added"}],"2014-04-18T03:47:02":[{"data":["Vote in plenary scheduled","Vote scheduled"],"path":["activities",3,"type"],"type":"changed"}],"2014-04-21T03:13:52":[{"data":{"body":"EP","date":"2014-04-16T00:00:00","type":"Vote scheduled"},"path":["activities",3],"type":"deleted"}],"2014-04-25T03:23:30":[{"data":{"body":"EP","date":"2014-04-16T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"T7-0409/2014","type":"Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading"}],"type":"Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading"},"path":["activities",3],"type":"added"},{"data":["Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage","Procedure completed"],"path":["procedure","stage_reached"],"type":"changed"}],"2014-11-09T22:20:19":[{"data":["
The Committee on Constitutional Affairs adopted the\nreport by David MARTIN (S&D, UK) on the amendment of Rule 90 of\nParliament's Rules of Procedure on international\nagreements.
\nMembers proposed authorising the presentation of\nopinions in the context of the scrutiny of international agreements\nby the Parliament: by extending the scope of application of Rule\n90(4) from the duration of the negotiations to the duration of the\nentire procedure from the beginning of the negotiations to the\nconclusion of the agreement, Parliament could intervene at any\nmoment in order to clarify its position in view of the consent\nwhich it is required to give.
\nRule 90 paragraph 5 of the Rules should be\namended so as to provide that requests by the Council for\nParliament's consent or opinion should be referred by the President\nto the committee responsible for consideration in accordance with\nRule 81 or Rule 43(1).
\nBefore the vote is taken, the committee responsible, a\npolitical group or at least one-tenth of the Members may propose\nthat Parliament seek an opinion from the Court of Justice on the\ncompatibility of an international agreement with the\nTreaties.
\nThe European Parliament decided by 650 votes to 15,\nwith 8 abstentions, to amend Rule 90 of Parliament's Rules of\nProcedure on international agreements.
\nThe amendments adopted are as follows:
\nOpinions in the context of the scrutiny of\ninternational agreements by the Parliament (Rule\n90(4)): at any stage of the\nnegotiations and from the end of the negotiations to the\nconclusion of the international agreement, Parliament may, on\nthe basis of a report from the committee responsible, adopt\nrecommendations and require them to be taken into account before\nthe conclusion of that agreement.
\nReview by the committee responsible (Rule\n90(5)): requests by the Council for\nParliament's consent or opinion should be referred by the President\nto the committee responsible for consideration in accordance with\nRule 81 or Rule 43(1).
\nOpinion of the Court of Justice (Rule\n90(6)): before the vote is taken, the\ncommittee responsible, a political group or at least one-tenth of\nthe Members may propose that Parliament seek an opinion from the\nCourt of Justice on the compatibility of an international agreement\nwith the Treaties.
\nThe Committee on Constitutional Affairs adopted the\nreport by David MARTIN (S&D, UK) on the amendment of Rule 90 of\nParliament's Rules of Procedure on international\nagreements.
\nMembers proposed authorising the presentation of\nopinions in the context of the scrutiny of international agreements\nby the Parliament: by extending the scope of application of Rule\n90(4) from the duration of the negotiations to the duration of the\nentire procedure from the beginning of the negotiations to the\nconclusion of the agreement, Parliament could intervene at any\nmoment in order to clarify its position in view of the consent\nwhich it is required to give.
\nRule 90 paragraph 5 of the Rules should be\namended so as to provide that requests by the Council for\nParliament's consent or opinion should be referred by the President\nto the committee responsible for consideration in accordance with\nRule 81 or Rule 43(1).
\nBefore the vote is taken, the committee responsible, a\npolitical group or at least one-tenth of the Members may propose\nthat Parliament seek an opinion from the Court of Justice on the\ncompatibility of an international agreement with the\nTreaties.
\nThe European Parliament decided by 650 votes to 15,\nwith 8 abstentions, to amend Rule 90 of Parliament's Rules of\nProcedure on international agreements.
\nThe amendments adopted are as follows:
\nOpinions in the context of the scrutiny of\ninternational agreements by the Parliament (Rule\n90(4)): at any stage of the\nnegotiations and from the end of the negotiations to the\nconclusion of the international agreement, Parliament may, on\nthe basis of a report from the committee responsible, adopt\nrecommendations and require them to be taken into account before\nthe conclusion of that agreement.
\nReview by the committee responsible (Rule\n90(5)): requests by the Council for\nParliament's consent or opinion should be referred by the President\nto the committee responsible for consideration in accordance with\nRule 81 or Rule 43(1).
\nOpinion of the Court of Justice (Rule\n90(6)): before the vote is taken, the\ncommittee responsible, a political group or at least one-tenth of\nthe Members may propose that Parliament seek an opinion from the\nCourt of Justice on the compatibility of an international agreement\nwith the Treaties.
\n