BETA


2013/2606(RSP) Resolution on a cybersecurity strategy of the European Union: an open, safe and secure cyberspace

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead IMCO SCHWAB Andreas (icon: PPE PPE), HARBOUR Malcolm (icon: ECR ECR) GARCÉS RAMÓN Vicente Miguel (icon: S&D S&D), MANDERS Antonius (icon: ALDE ALDE), ENGSTRÖM Christian (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), SALVINI Matteo (icon: EFD EFD)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 132-p2

Events

2013/12/19
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2013/09/12
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2013/09/12
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 585 votes to 45 with 8 abstentions a resolution tabled by the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the Committee on Foreign Affairs on a Cybersecurity Strategy of the European Union: An Open, Safe and Secure Cyberspace, in response to the Joint Communication of 7 February 2013 by the Commission and the HR/VP on the subject.

It notes the growing cyber-challenges, in the form of increasingly sophisticated threats and attacks, as well as the need to ensure that cyberspace remains open to free expression and to online services. Members stress the need for a strategic communication policy on EU cyber-security, cyber-crisis situations, strategy reviews, public-private collaboration and alerts, and recommendations to the public.

Parliament reiterates its call on the Member States to adopt national cyber-security strategies that: (i) cover technical, coordination, human resources and financial allocation aspects, (ii) include distinct rules on the benefits for and responsibilities of the private sector, in order to guarantee their participation; (iii) provide for comprehensive risk management procedures as well as safeguard the regulatory environment. At the same time it stresses that Member States should aim never to endanger citizens' rights and freedoms when developing responses to cyber threats and attacks.

The resolution also emphasises the need for training programmes aimed at promoting awareness, among European citizens, in particular with regard to personal security, as a part of a digital literacy curriculum from an early age.

Cyber-resilience : Parliament insists on the development of cyber-resilience for critical infrastructures, and recalls that the forthcoming arrangements for the implementation of the Solidarity Clause (Article 222 TFEU) should take into consideration the risk of cyber-attack against a Member State. The Commission and the HR are asked to take this risk into account in their joint integrated threat and risk assessment reports to be issued as from 2015. Parliament welcomes the Commission's notion to create a risk-management culture with regard to cyber-security, and urges Member States and Union institutions rapidly to include cyber-crisis management in their crisis management plans and risk analyses . Private sector actors must also be encouraged to include cyber-crisis management in their management plans and risk analyses, and to train their staff in cyber-security.

Members stress the need to establish a network of well functioning Computer Emergency and Response Teams (CERTs) operational on a 24/7 basis. They also support ENISA in exercising its duties with regard to network and information security, in particular by providing guidance and by advising Member States.

Industrial and technological resources : Parliament calls on Union institutions and Member States to take the necessary measures to establish a ‘single market for cyber-security’ in which users and suppliers are able to make best use of the innovations, synergies and combined expertise on offer, and which enables the entry of SMEs. Member States are asked to consider making joint investments in the European cyber-security industry , much in the same way as has been done in other industries, such as the aviation sector.

Cybercrime: recalling that cybercrime costs the global economy almost EUR 295 billion each year, Parliament takes the view that, given the borderless nature of cybercrime, joint efforts made, and expertise offered, at Union level, above the level of the individual Member States, are particularly important, and that Eurojust, Europol's EC3, CERTs, and universities and research centres must therefore be provided with adequate resources and capabilities to function properly as hubs for expertise, cooperation and information-sharing. Furthermore, citizens should be able easily to access information on cyber-threats and how to fight them.

Lastly, all Member States should ratify the Council of Europe's Budapest Convention on Cybercrime.

Cyber-defence : the resolution calls on Member States to intensify their cooperation with the European Defence Agency (EDA) with a view to developing proposals and initiatives for cyber-defence capabilities. It also calls on the VP/HR to include cyber-crisis management in crisis management planning , and stresses the need for the Member States, in cooperation with the EDA, to develop plans to protect CSDP missions and operations against cyber-attacks.

International policy : since international cooperation and dialogue play an essential role in creating trust and transparency, Parliament wants the Commission and EEAS to set up a cyber-diplomacy team, whose responsibilities would include the promotion of dialogue with like-minded countries and organisations. It calls on the VP/HR to mainstream the cyber-security dimension into the EU's external actions, especially in relation to third countries. In this connection, the EU-US Working Group on Cybersecurity and Cybercrime should serve as an instrument for the EU and the US to exchange best practices on cyber-security policies.

Implementation: Members ask the Commission to draw up a clear roadmap determining the timelines for the objectives to be delivered at Union level under the cyber-security strategy and invite Member States to agree on a similar delivery plan for national activities under this strategy.

Documents
2013/09/12
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2013/09/10
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2013/09/06
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2013/07/09
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2013/06/25
   CSL - Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council
Details

On 7 February 2013, the Commission and the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy issued a Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council on “the Cybersecurity Strategy of the European Union: An Open, Safe and Secure Cyberspace".

On this basis, the Council adopted a series of conclusions as follows:

Comprehensive approach : the Council regarded it essential and urgent to develop further and implement a comprehensive approach for EU cyberspace policy that:

protects and promotes enjoyment of human rights and is grounded in the EU’s fundamental values of democracy, human rights and the rule of law,

advances European prosperity and the social and economic benefits of cyberspace including the Internet, promotes effective and improved cyber security across the EU and beyond, advances the efforts to bridge the global digital divide and promotes international cooperation in cybersecurity, reflects the roles and rights of individual citizens, the private sector, and civil society in cyber issues.

In this context, the Council invited the Member States, the Commission and the High Representative to work together, respecting each others’ areas of competence and the principle of subsidiarity, in response to the strategic objectives:

(1) Values : the Council invited Member States to take all reasonable steps to ensure that all EU citizens are able to access and enjoy the benefits of the Internet.

(2) Prosperity : legislation in support of cybersecurity should foster innovation and growth according to the Council. The digital economy is a major driver of growth, innovation and employment, and cybersecurity is key to protecting the digital economy. The Council also stated the importance at national level of CIIP (Critical Information Infrastructure Protection).

(3) Cyber resilience : Member States are invited to take steps to ensure they reach an efficient national level of cybersecurity, by developing and implementing the proper policies, organisational and operational capacities in order to protect information systems in cyberspace, in particular those considered to be critical. The Council called for a series of measures such as: (i) support awareness-raising on the nature of the threats and the fundamentals of good digital practices, at all levels; (ii) support the owners and providers of ICT systems in protecting their own systems; (iii) foster pan-European cybersecurity cooperation, in particular by enhancing pan-European cybersecurity exercises; (iv) strengthen and expand cooperation between Member States and EU users, building on existing structures; (v) take into account cybersecurity issues in light of ongoing work on the solidarity clause.

(4) Cybercrime : the Council invited the Commission to support Member States, at their request, to identify gaps and strengthen their capability to investigate and combat cybercrime. It suggested the use of the future Internal Security Fund (ISF), within its budget limit, to support relevant authorities fighting cybercrime as well as the use of the Instrument for Stability (IfS) to develop the fight against cybercrime as well as cybercriminal organisations. It also suggested continuing to facilitate cross-community cooperation, in particular by supporting Europol.

Other proposals have been made as regards the fight against cybercrime through the cooperation with third countries and the Common Security and Defence Policy.

At the same time, the Council called upon the Commission and High Representative to produce a progress report on the cybersecurity Strategy to be presented at the High Level Conference to be held in February 2014. It also proposed to hold regular meetings of the competent Council preparatory bodies, (in particular the FoP on Cyber Issues) to assist in setting EU cyber priorities and strategic objectives as part of a comprehensive policy framework.

Lastly, the Council invited the Commission to present the financing of the Strategy, taking into account the upcoming negotiations with the European Parliament.

2013/06/25
   CSL - Council Meeting
2013/06/06
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2013/03/20
   EP - SCHWAB Andreas (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in IMCO
2013/03/20
   EP - HARBOUR Malcolm (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in IMCO

Documents

Votes

B7-0386/2013 - Résolution #

2013/09/12 Outcome: +: 585, -: 45, 0: 8
DE FR IT ES PL GB RO BE HU BG AT SE SK CZ PT FI EL IE DK HR NL SI LT EE LV LU MT CY
Total
86
65
49
46
44
55
27
18
18
15
19
16
13
19
19
11
17
12
12
11
22
8
7
6
8
4
4
6
icon: PPE PPE
222

Czechia PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Malta PPE

2
2
icon: S&D S&D
173

Finland S&D

2

Ireland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
71

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

1

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1
3

Slovenia ALDE

2

Lithuania ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
52

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: ECR ECR
42

Italy ECR

1

Hungary ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
23

United Kingdom EFD

4

Belgium EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Denmark EFD

1

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2
icon: NI NI
25

France NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Spain NI

1

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

1
5

Ireland NI

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2013-0386_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2013-0386_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130910&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2013-09-10-TOC_EN.html
events/4
date
2013-09-12T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0376_EN.html title: T7-0376/2013
summary
events/4
date
2013-09-12T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0376_EN.html title: T7-0376/2013
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
associated
False
rapporteur
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
associated
False
date
rapporteur
shadows
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2013-386&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2013-0386_EN.html
docs/2/body
EC
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-376
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0376_EN.html
activities
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 3251 council: General Affairs date: 2013-06-25T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2013-07-09T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: GARCÉS RAMÓN Vicente Miguel group: ALDE name: MANDERS Toine group: Verts/ALE name: ENGSTRÖM Christian group: EFD name: SALVINI Matteo responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2013-03-20T00:00:00 2013-03-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PPE name: SCHWAB Andreas group: ECR name: HARBOUR Malcolm
  • date: 2013-09-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130910&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2013-09-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23400&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-376 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0376/2013 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Communications Networks, Content and Technology commissioner: KROES Neelie
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
associated
False
date
rapporteur
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
IMCO
date
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
rapporteur
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 3251 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3251*&MEET_DATE=25/06/2013 date: 2013-06-25T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2013-06-06T00:00:00 docs: title: PE513.182 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2013-09-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2013-386&language=EN title: B7-0386/2013 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2013-12-19T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=23400&j=0&l=en title: SP(2013)816 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2013-06-25T00:00:00 type: Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council body: CSL summary: On 7 February 2013, the Commission and the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy issued a Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council on “the Cybersecurity Strategy of the European Union: An Open, Safe and Secure Cyberspace". On this basis, the Council adopted a series of conclusions as follows: Comprehensive approach : the Council regarded it essential and urgent to develop further and implement a comprehensive approach for EU cyberspace policy that: protects and promotes enjoyment of human rights and is grounded in the EU’s fundamental values of democracy, human rights and the rule of law, advances European prosperity and the social and economic benefits of cyberspace including the Internet, promotes effective and improved cyber security across the EU and beyond, advances the efforts to bridge the global digital divide and promotes international cooperation in cybersecurity, reflects the roles and rights of individual citizens, the private sector, and civil society in cyber issues. In this context, the Council invited the Member States, the Commission and the High Representative to work together, respecting each others’ areas of competence and the principle of subsidiarity, in response to the strategic objectives: (1) Values : the Council invited Member States to take all reasonable steps to ensure that all EU citizens are able to access and enjoy the benefits of the Internet. (2) Prosperity : legislation in support of cybersecurity should foster innovation and growth according to the Council. The digital economy is a major driver of growth, innovation and employment, and cybersecurity is key to protecting the digital economy. The Council also stated the importance at national level of CIIP (Critical Information Infrastructure Protection). (3) Cyber resilience : Member States are invited to take steps to ensure they reach an efficient national level of cybersecurity, by developing and implementing the proper policies, organisational and operational capacities in order to protect information systems in cyberspace, in particular those considered to be critical. The Council called for a series of measures such as: (i) support awareness-raising on the nature of the threats and the fundamentals of good digital practices, at all levels; (ii) support the owners and providers of ICT systems in protecting their own systems; (iii) foster pan-European cybersecurity cooperation, in particular by enhancing pan-European cybersecurity exercises; (iv) strengthen and expand cooperation between Member States and EU users, building on existing structures; (v) take into account cybersecurity issues in light of ongoing work on the solidarity clause. (4) Cybercrime : the Council invited the Commission to support Member States, at their request, to identify gaps and strengthen their capability to investigate and combat cybercrime. It suggested the use of the future Internal Security Fund (ISF), within its budget limit, to support relevant authorities fighting cybercrime as well as the use of the Instrument for Stability (IfS) to develop the fight against cybercrime as well as cybercriminal organisations. It also suggested continuing to facilitate cross-community cooperation, in particular by supporting Europol. Other proposals have been made as regards the fight against cybercrime through the cooperation with third countries and the Common Security and Defence Policy. At the same time, the Council called upon the Commission and High Representative to produce a progress report on the cybersecurity Strategy to be presented at the High Level Conference to be held in February 2014. It also proposed to hold regular meetings of the competent Council preparatory bodies, (in particular the FoP on Cyber Issues) to assist in setting EU cyber priorities and strategic objectives as part of a comprehensive policy framework. Lastly, the Council invited the Commission to present the financing of the Strategy, taking into account the upcoming negotiations with the European Parliament.
  • date: 2013-07-09T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-09-10T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130910&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2013-09-12T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23400&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2013-09-12T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-376 title: T7-0376/2013 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 585 votes to 45 with 8 abstentions a resolution tabled by the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the Committee on Foreign Affairs on a Cybersecurity Strategy of the European Union: An Open, Safe and Secure Cyberspace, in response to the Joint Communication of 7 February 2013 by the Commission and the HR/VP on the subject. It notes the growing cyber-challenges, in the form of increasingly sophisticated threats and attacks, as well as the need to ensure that cyberspace remains open to free expression and to online services. Members stress the need for a strategic communication policy on EU cyber-security, cyber-crisis situations, strategy reviews, public-private collaboration and alerts, and recommendations to the public. Parliament reiterates its call on the Member States to adopt national cyber-security strategies that: (i) cover technical, coordination, human resources and financial allocation aspects, (ii) include distinct rules on the benefits for and responsibilities of the private sector, in order to guarantee their participation; (iii) provide for comprehensive risk management procedures as well as safeguard the regulatory environment. At the same time it stresses that Member States should aim never to endanger citizens' rights and freedoms when developing responses to cyber threats and attacks. The resolution also emphasises the need for training programmes aimed at promoting awareness, among European citizens, in particular with regard to personal security, as a part of a digital literacy curriculum from an early age. Cyber-resilience : Parliament insists on the development of cyber-resilience for critical infrastructures, and recalls that the forthcoming arrangements for the implementation of the Solidarity Clause (Article 222 TFEU) should take into consideration the risk of cyber-attack against a Member State. The Commission and the HR are asked to take this risk into account in their joint integrated threat and risk assessment reports to be issued as from 2015. Parliament welcomes the Commission's notion to create a risk-management culture with regard to cyber-security, and urges Member States and Union institutions rapidly to include cyber-crisis management in their crisis management plans and risk analyses . Private sector actors must also be encouraged to include cyber-crisis management in their management plans and risk analyses, and to train their staff in cyber-security. Members stress the need to establish a network of well functioning Computer Emergency and Response Teams (CERTs) operational on a 24/7 basis. They also support ENISA in exercising its duties with regard to network and information security, in particular by providing guidance and by advising Member States. Industrial and technological resources : Parliament calls on Union institutions and Member States to take the necessary measures to establish a ‘single market for cyber-security’ in which users and suppliers are able to make best use of the innovations, synergies and combined expertise on offer, and which enables the entry of SMEs. Member States are asked to consider making joint investments in the European cyber-security industry , much in the same way as has been done in other industries, such as the aviation sector. Cybercrime: recalling that cybercrime costs the global economy almost EUR 295 billion each year, Parliament takes the view that, given the borderless nature of cybercrime, joint efforts made, and expertise offered, at Union level, above the level of the individual Member States, are particularly important, and that Eurojust, Europol's EC3, CERTs, and universities and research centres must therefore be provided with adequate resources and capabilities to function properly as hubs for expertise, cooperation and information-sharing. Furthermore, citizens should be able easily to access information on cyber-threats and how to fight them. Lastly, all Member States should ratify the Council of Europe's Budapest Convention on Cybercrime. Cyber-defence : the resolution calls on Member States to intensify their cooperation with the European Defence Agency (EDA) with a view to developing proposals and initiatives for cyber-defence capabilities. It also calls on the VP/HR to include cyber-crisis management in crisis management planning , and stresses the need for the Member States, in cooperation with the EDA, to develop plans to protect CSDP missions and operations against cyber-attacks. International policy : since international cooperation and dialogue play an essential role in creating trust and transparency, Parliament wants the Commission and EEAS to set up a cyber-diplomacy team, whose responsibilities would include the promotion of dialogue with like-minded countries and organisations. It calls on the VP/HR to mainstream the cyber-security dimension into the EU's external actions, especially in relation to third countries. In this connection, the EU-US Working Group on Cybersecurity and Cybercrime should serve as an instrument for the EU and the US to exchange best practices on cyber-security policies. Implementation: Members ask the Commission to draw up a clear roadmap determining the timelines for the objectives to be delivered at Union level under the cyber-security strategy and invite Member States to agree on a similar delivery plan for national activities under this strategy.
  • date: 2013-09-12T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/connect/index_en.htm title: Communications Networks, Content and Technology commissioner: KROES Neelie
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
IMCO/7/12435
New
  • IMCO/7/12435
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 132-p2
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 123-p2
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.30.06 Information and communication technologies
New
3.30.07
Cybersecurity, cyberspace policy
procedure/subtype
Old
Resolution on statements
New
Resolution on statement
procedure/title
Old
Resolution on a Cybersecurity Strategy of the European Union: an open, safe and secure cyberspace
New
Resolution on a cybersecurity strategy of the European Union: an open, safe and secure cyberspace
activities
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 3251 council: General Affairs date: 2013-06-25T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2013-07-09T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: GARCÉS RAMÓN Vicente Miguel group: ALDE name: MANDERS Toine group: Verts/ALE name: ENGSTRÖM Christian group: EFD name: SALVINI Matteo responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2013-03-20T00:00:00 2013-03-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PPE name: SCHWAB Andreas group: ECR name: HARBOUR Malcolm
  • date: 2013-09-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130910&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2013-09-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23400&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-376 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0376/2013 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: GARCÉS RAMÓN Vicente Miguel group: ALDE name: MANDERS Toine group: Verts/ALE name: ENGSTRÖM Christian group: EFD name: SALVINI Matteo responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2013-03-20T00:00:00 2013-03-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PPE name: SCHWAB Andreas group: ECR name: HARBOUR Malcolm
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/connect/index_en.htm title: Communications Networks, Content and Technology commissioner: KROES Neelie
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
IMCO/7/12435
reference
2013/2606(RSP)
title
Resolution on a Cybersecurity Strategy of the European Union: an open, safe and secure cyberspace
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 123-p2
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Resolution on statements
Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
type
RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
subject
3.30.06 Information and communication technologies