Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
Next event: Debate in plenary scheduled 2015/04/28 more...
- Vote in plenary scheduled 2015/04/29
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | CZARNECKI Ryszard (ECR) | ZDECHOVSKÝ Tomáš (EPP), VAUGHAN Derek (S&D), ALIOT Louis (NI), DE JONG Dennis (GUE/NGL), VALLI Marco (EFD) |
Opinion | ECON | FERBER Markus (EPP) |
Activites
-
2015/04/29
Vote in plenary scheduled
-
2015/04/28
Debate in plenary scheduled
- 2015/03/30 Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
-
2015/03/23
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
-
2014/10/20
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
-
2014/07/30
Non-legislative basic document published
-
COM(2014)0510
summary
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2013, as part of the 2013 discharge procedure. Analysis of the accounts of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA). CONTENT: this Commission document sets out the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2013 as prepared on the basis of the information presented by the institutions, organisations and bodies of the EU, in accordance with Article 129 (2) of the Financial Regulation applicable to the EU's General Budget, including the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA). The document contains the figures on which the discharge procedure is based. Discharge procedure of the EU agencies: the EU Budget finances a wide range of policies and programmes throughout the EU. In accordance with the priorities set by the European Parliament and the Council in the multi-annual financial framework (MFF), the European Commission carries out specific programmes, activities and projects in the field with the technical support of some specialised agencies. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from a budgetary and accrual accounting perspective. The consolidated reports on the implementation of the general budget of the EU include the budget implementation of all Institutions. Agencies do not have a separate budget inside the EU budget; and they are partially financed by a Commission budget subsidy. Each agency is subject to its own discharge procedure. ESMA: in 2013, the tasks and budget of this agency were as follows: description of ESMA's tasks: ESMA, which is located in Frankfurt, was set up by Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council with a view to protecting the public interest by contributing to the short, medium and long-term stability and efficiency of the financial system for the economy of the European Union, its citizens and its companies; ESMA's budget for the 2013 financial year: ESMA’s budget for 2013, as presented in the Commission document on the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union, gives the following figures: § Commitment appropriations : - committed : EUR 28 million; - paid : EUR 26 million; - carried-over : 0. § Payment appropriations : - committed : EUR 32 million; - paid : EUR 24 million; - carried-over : EUR 6 million. Please refer also to the final accounts of the Securities and Market Authority.
- DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/', 'title': 'Budget'}, GEORGIEVA Kristalina
-
COM(2014)0510
summary
Documents
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2014)0510
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A8-0087/2015
Amendments | Dossier |
30 |
2014/2122(DEC)
2015/01/09
ECON
25 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Takes note of the observation made by the Commission, in its recent report on the operation of the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) and the ESFS, that, in spite of difficult circumstances, the ESAs have quickly established well-functioning organisations which, overall, have performed well against their broad range of tasks, while facing increasing demands with limited human resources;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Notes in this connection that focusing more closely on the mandate from the European legislator might contribute to a more efficient use of resources and more effective achievement of objectives;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses with regard to the increasing expenses that the EU budget already faces difficulties due to outstanding payments; therefore urges ESMA to make efficient use of synergies arising from close cooperation with national supervisory agencies and to pay full respect to the principle of subsidiarity by refraining from any tasks assigned to national supervisory agencies; encourages ESMA to examine its internal administrative processes with a view to reducing administrative costs;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Encourages ESMA to develop further its consumer protection strategy making full use of its mandate;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that, given its limited resources, ESMA must s
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that, given its limited resources, ESMA must stick strictly to the tasks assigned to it by the Union legislator
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that, given its limited resources, ESMA must stick strictly to the tasks assigned to it by the Union legislator, remain free of political agenda and must not seek to broaden its mandate beyond those assignments;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes in this connection that ESMA spends a not insignificant proportion of its available resources on work relating to guidelines and recommendations which are not based on a direct mandate from the European legislator;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses that ESMA, while waiting for a stronger mandate on consumer protection, should seek to make broader and more active use of already available powers in that field; underlines that intensified consumer-focused collaboration with the other ESAs through the Joint Committee would be a positive step forward in this regard;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on ESMA to ensure that in future no legal commitments are entered into in advance of budget commitments;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Welcomes that ESMA has taken a proactive approach to markets' supervision as foreseen in Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/77/EC1; ______________________ 1 OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 84.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. C
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Concludes that ESMA’s mixed financing arrangement is inflexible, burdensome and a potential threat to its independence; calls therefore
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Concludes that ESMA’s mixed financing arrangement is inflexible, burdensome and a potential threat to its independence; therefore calls on the Commission to reconsider the financing arrangement in favour of a
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Concludes that ESMA’s present mixed financing arrangement is inflexible, administratively burdensome and a potential threat to its independence; therefore calls on the Commission to reconsider the financing arrangement in favour of an independent budget line from the EU budget and the introduction of fees by market participants.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that ESMA’s role in promoting a common supervisory regime across the Single Market
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that ESMA’s role in promoting a common supervisory regime across the Single Market is essential to ensure better integrated, more efficient and safer financial markets in the EU;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Emphasizes, without questioning that overall opinion, that ESMA needs to get its act together on a couple of minor points highlighted by the Court; finds the 2013 situation regarding late payments of bills and incorrectly paid VAT to be unacceptable;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Acknowledges that the ESFS is still in a setting-up phase and stresses that the tasks already entrusted to ESMA, as well as future tasks envisaged in on-going legislative work, require an adequate level of staff and budget to allow for satisfactory supervision; regrets that Council and Commission consistently refuse to grant the modest requests developed jointly by the ESAs and their national counterparts; stresses
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Acknowledges that the ESFS is still in a setting-up phase and stresses that the tasks already entrusted to ESMA, as well as future tasks envisaged in on-going legislative work, require an adequate level of staff and budget to allow for
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Acknowledges that the ESFS is still in a setting-up phase and stresses that the tasks already entrusted to ESMA, as well as future tasks envisaged in on-going
source: 546.609
2015/03/06
CONT
5 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1. Grants the Executive Director of the European Securities and Markets Authority discharge in respect of the implementation of the Authority’s budget for the financial year 2013;
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a decision 1 Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 2 2. Approves the closure of the accounts of the European Securities and Markets Authority for the financial year 2013;
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a decision 2 Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13 a. Notes that the current financing arrangements of the Authority are inflexible, create unnecessary administrative burdens and might jeopardise its independence; urges the Authority to cooperate with the Commission in order to revise its current financing structure;
source: 539.772
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
activities/3/docs/0/text |
|
activities/5 |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/2 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/2/date |
Old
2015-03-24T00:00:00New
2015-03-23T00:00:00 |
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c |
activities/1/committees/1/date |
2014-10-21T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c |
committees/1/date |
2014-10-21T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1/committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|