BETA


2016/2054(INI) EU common commercial policy in the context of wildlife sustainability imperatives

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead INTA MCCLARKIN Emma (icon: ECR ECR) FJELLNER Christofer (icon: PPE PPE), MARTIN David (icon: S&D S&D), TAKKULA Hannu (icon: ALDE ALDE), MINEUR Anne-Marie (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), JADOT Yannick (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), BEGHIN Tiziana (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2017/06/29
   Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2017/03/02
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2017/03/02
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2017/03/02
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 579 votes to 15, with 20 abstentions, a resolution on EU Common Commercial Policy in the context of wildlife sustainability imperatives.

The world is facing an unprecedented surge in wildlife trafficking. According to estimates, the illegal trade in wild flora and fauna is the fourth most profitable area of criminal activity, with an estimated turnover of as much as EUR 20 billion.

Parliament welcomed the EU action plan against wildlife trafficking and stated that the EU must lead efforts in tackling not only supply-side issues, including development issues on the ground in third countries, but also demand for illegal products in domestic markets, including online platforms.

Parliament called on the EU consider a possible ban at European level of trade, export or re-export within and outside the EU of elephant ivory , including ‘pre-Convention’ ivory, in a manner compliant with WTO law.

It also made the following recommendations:

ensuring the private sector’s involvement in the fight against wildlife trafficking, including the engagement of online marketplaces and social media; strengthening the customs dimension of the European Union’s Action Plan and promoting work on information sharing and capacity building, including specific training for customs officers; supporting the approach of including anti-corruption provisions in future trade agreements as well as those aimed at tackling wildlife trafficking; eliminating all remaining legal loopholes that could facilitate the “laundering” of illegally sourced wildlife and wildlife products; allocating sufficient resources should be committed for policies and measures designed to meet the EU’s objectives in terms of combating the illegal wildlife trade, which includes resources for third countries in terms of capacity-building; reinforcing cooperation with all actors concerned to ensure an integrated approach that acts to curtail demand and raise awareness in demand markets; ensuring that the illegal criminal networks and syndicates active in illegal wildlife trade are targeted for disruption, elimination and prosecution.

Parliament underlined that the common commercial policy should promote binding corporate social responsibility standards , given that corporate social responsibility standards are of particular importance within transport networks.

Documents
2017/03/02
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2017/01/30
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Details

The Committee on International Trade adopted the own-initiative report by Emma McCLARKIN (ECR, UK) on EU Common Commercial Policy in the context of wildlife sustainability imperatives.

The world is facing an unprecedented surge in wildlife trafficking. According to estimates, the illegal trade in wild flora and fauna is the fourth most profitable area of criminal activity, with an estimated turnover of as much as EUR 20 billion.

Members welcomed the EU action plan against wildlife trafficking and stated that the EU must lead efforts in tackling not only supply-side issues, including development issues on the ground in third countries, but also demand for illegal products in domestic markets, including online platforms.

The report made the following recommendations:

on trade policy, the Union should adopt an approach that not only prioritises the issue of combating the illegal wildlife trade but includes in all future agreements provisions aimed at: (i) its reduction and ultimate elimination; along with (ii) robust and effective complementary measures, with particular regard to training, prevention and the application of sanctions in the field of forest management, health and customs; EU trade policy should not prevent the EU or its trading partners from taking decisions that are necessary for the protection of wildlife and natural resources, provided that such measures continue to be in pursuit of legitimate public policy objectives and do not represent arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination; given that there is no “one size fits all” solution to global wildlife sustainability and combating the illegal trade, it is necessary to ensure full flexibility and to share information, data and best practice , in order to facilitate dialogue with a view to enhanced cooperation, bearing in mind the cross-border nature of this type of infringement; Member States should consider policy solutions that would allow for the elimination of all remaining legal loopholes that could facilitate the “laundering” of illegally sourced wildlife and wildlife products; exhaustive monitoring should be carried out in this connection; the EU should consider a possible ban at European level of trade, export or re-export within and outside the EU of elephant ivory , in a manner compliant with WTO law; sufficient resources should be committed for policies and measures designed to meet the EU’s objectives in terms of combating the illegal wildlife trade, which includes resources for third countries in terms of capacity-building; the Commission and the Member States should continue to work with all actors concerned to ensure an integrated approach that acts to curtail demand and raise awareness in demand markets; more should be done to ensure that the illegal criminal networks and syndicates active in illegal wildlife trade are targeted for disruption, elimination and prosecution, and that Member States should ensure that the punishments and sentences reserved for wildlife crime are both proportionate and dissuasive and in line with commitments, as defined in the UN Convention against Transnational Organised Crime; the EU should explore, within the scope of the WTO framework, how global trade and environmental regimes can better support each other; lastly, further opportunities for cooperation between the WTO and CITES should be explored, in particular in terms of offering technical assistance and capacity building on trade and environment matters to officials from developing countries.

Documents
2017/01/24
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2016/12/12
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/11/08
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2016/04/28
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2016/02/15
   EP - Responsible Committee

Documents

Votes

A8-0012/2017 - Emma McClarkin - Am 1

2017/03/02 Outcome: +: 318, -: 271, 0: 33
IT ES DE EL SE FR GB BE DK LU CY PT LT EE RO IE MT AT LV HU BG CZ NL FI HR SI SK PL
Total
61
45
77
17
16
55
58
17
10
6
6
18
9
5
28
10
4
16
7
15
12
19
22
12
10
7
12
48
icon: S&D S&D
157

Belgium S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
41

France GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
36

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
14

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

2

France NI

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
31

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

2

Poland ENF

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Romania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
63

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Belgium ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
178

Belgium PPE

4

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

3

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

2
3

Finland PPE

2

A8-0012/2017 - Emma McClarkin - résolution

2017/03/02 Outcome: +: 579, 0: 20, -: 15
DE IT FR ES PL GB RO BE NL CZ PT AT EL HU BG FI SE SK DK HR LT SI LU CY LV MT EE IE
Total
73
64
50
47
47
56
28
19
22
19
18
16
18
14
12
12
16
12
10
9
8
7
6
6
6
5
4
10
icon: PPE PPE
175

Finland PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

1

Malta PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
157

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Belgium ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
52

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

France GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
4
icon: ENF ENF
32

Poland ENF

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
37

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
13

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

France NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Hungary NI

2
AmendmentsDossier
85 2016/2054(INI)
2016/12/09 INTA 85 amendments...
source: 595.641

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

activities
  • date: 2016-04-28T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: FJELLNER Christofer group: S&D name: MARTIN David group: ALDE name: TAKKULA Hannu group: GUE/NGL name: MINEUR Anne-Marie group: Verts/ALE name: JADOT Yannick group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2016-02-15T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma
  • date: 2017-01-24T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: FJELLNER Christofer group: S&D name: MARTIN David group: ALDE name: TAKKULA Hannu group: GUE/NGL name: MINEUR Anne-Marie group: Verts/ALE name: JADOT Yannick group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2016-02-15T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma
  • date: 2017-01-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0012&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0012/2017 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2017-03-02T00:00:00 body: EP type: Debate in Parliament docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0064 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0064/2017
commission
  • body: EC dg: Trade commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2016-02-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
INTA
date
2016-02-15T00:00:00
committee_full
International Trade
rapporteur
group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma
docs
  • date: 2016-11-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE592.341 title: PE592.341 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2016-12-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE595.641 title: PE595.641 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2017-06-29T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=28118&j=0&l=en title: SP(2017)348 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2016-04-28T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2017-01-24T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2017-01-30T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0012&language=EN title: A8-0012/2017 summary: The Committee on International Trade adopted the own-initiative report by Emma McCLARKIN (ECR, UK) on EU Common Commercial Policy in the context of wildlife sustainability imperatives. The world is facing an unprecedented surge in wildlife trafficking. According to estimates, the illegal trade in wild flora and fauna is the fourth most profitable area of criminal activity, with an estimated turnover of as much as EUR 20 billion. Members welcomed the EU action plan against wildlife trafficking and stated that the EU must lead efforts in tackling not only supply-side issues, including development issues on the ground in third countries, but also demand for illegal products in domestic markets, including online platforms. The report made the following recommendations: on trade policy, the Union should adopt an approach that not only prioritises the issue of combating the illegal wildlife trade but includes in all future agreements provisions aimed at: (i) its reduction and ultimate elimination; along with (ii) robust and effective complementary measures, with particular regard to training, prevention and the application of sanctions in the field of forest management, health and customs; EU trade policy should not prevent the EU or its trading partners from taking decisions that are necessary for the protection of wildlife and natural resources, provided that such measures continue to be in pursuit of legitimate public policy objectives and do not represent arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination; given that there is no “one size fits all” solution to global wildlife sustainability and combating the illegal trade, it is necessary to ensure full flexibility and to share information, data and best practice , in order to facilitate dialogue with a view to enhanced cooperation, bearing in mind the cross-border nature of this type of infringement; Member States should consider policy solutions that would allow for the elimination of all remaining legal loopholes that could facilitate the “laundering” of illegally sourced wildlife and wildlife products; exhaustive monitoring should be carried out in this connection; the EU should consider a possible ban at European level of trade, export or re-export within and outside the EU of elephant ivory , in a manner compliant with WTO law; sufficient resources should be committed for policies and measures designed to meet the EU’s objectives in terms of combating the illegal wildlife trade, which includes resources for third countries in terms of capacity-building; the Commission and the Member States should continue to work with all actors concerned to ensure an integrated approach that acts to curtail demand and raise awareness in demand markets; more should be done to ensure that the illegal criminal networks and syndicates active in illegal wildlife trade are targeted for disruption, elimination and prosecution, and that Member States should ensure that the punishments and sentences reserved for wildlife crime are both proportionate and dissuasive and in line with commitments, as defined in the UN Convention against Transnational Organised Crime; the EU should explore, within the scope of the WTO framework, how global trade and environmental regimes can better support each other; lastly, further opportunities for cooperation between the WTO and CITES should be explored, in particular in terms of offering technical assistance and capacity building on trade and environment matters to officials from developing countries.
  • date: 2017-03-02T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=28118&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2017-03-02T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20170302&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2017-03-02T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0064 title: T8-0064/2017 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 579 votes to 15, with 20 abstentions, a resolution on EU Common Commercial Policy in the context of wildlife sustainability imperatives. The world is facing an unprecedented surge in wildlife trafficking. According to estimates, the illegal trade in wild flora and fauna is the fourth most profitable area of criminal activity, with an estimated turnover of as much as EUR 20 billion. Parliament welcomed the EU action plan against wildlife trafficking and stated that the EU must lead efforts in tackling not only supply-side issues, including development issues on the ground in third countries, but also demand for illegal products in domestic markets, including online platforms. Parliament called on the EU consider a possible ban at European level of trade, export or re-export within and outside the EU of elephant ivory , including ‘pre-Convention’ ivory, in a manner compliant with WTO law. It also made the following recommendations: ensuring the private sector’s involvement in the fight against wildlife trafficking, including the engagement of online marketplaces and social media; strengthening the customs dimension of the European Union’s Action Plan and promoting work on information sharing and capacity building, including specific training for customs officers; supporting the approach of including anti-corruption provisions in future trade agreements as well as those aimed at tackling wildlife trafficking; eliminating all remaining legal loopholes that could facilitate the “laundering” of illegally sourced wildlife and wildlife products; allocating sufficient resources should be committed for policies and measures designed to meet the EU’s objectives in terms of combating the illegal wildlife trade, which includes resources for third countries in terms of capacity-building; reinforcing cooperation with all actors concerned to ensure an integrated approach that acts to curtail demand and raise awareness in demand markets; ensuring that the illegal criminal networks and syndicates active in illegal wildlife trade are targeted for disruption, elimination and prosecution. Parliament underlined that the common commercial policy should promote binding corporate social responsibility standards , given that corporate social responsibility standards are of particular importance within transport networks.
  • date: 2017-03-02T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/trade_en title: Trade commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
INTA/8/06284
New
  • INTA/8/06284
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.70.01 Protection of natural resources: fauna, flora, nature, wildlife, countryside; biodiversity
  • 6.20 Common commercial policy in general
New
3.70.01
Protection of natural resources: fauna, flora, nature, wildlife, countryside; biodiversity
6.20
Common commercial policy in general
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0064 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0064/2017
activities/3/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/2/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on International Trade adopted the own-initiative report by Emma McCLARKIN (ECR, UK) on EU Common Commercial Policy in the context of wildlife sustainability imperatives.

    The world is facing an unprecedented surge in wildlife trafficking. According to estimates, the illegal trade in wild flora and fauna is the fourth most profitable area of criminal activity, with an estimated turnover of as much as EUR 20 billion.

    Members welcomed the EU action plan against wildlife trafficking and stated that the EU must lead efforts in tackling not only supply-side issues, including development issues on the ground in third countries, but also demand for illegal products in domestic markets, including online platforms.

    The report made the following recommendations:

    • on trade policy, the Union should adopt an approach that not only prioritises the issue of combating the illegal wildlife trade but includes in all future agreements provisions aimed at: (i) its reduction and ultimate elimination; along with (ii) robust and effective complementary measures, with particular regard to training, prevention and the application of sanctions in the field of forest management, health and customs;
    • EU trade policy should not prevent the EU or its trading partners from taking decisions that are necessary for the protection of wildlife and natural resources, provided that such measures continue to be in pursuit of legitimate public policy objectives and do not represent arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination;
    • given that there is no “one size fits all” solution to global wildlife sustainability and combating the illegal trade, it is necessary to ensure full flexibility and to share information, data and best practice, in order to facilitate dialogue with a view to enhanced cooperation, bearing in mind the cross-border nature of this type of infringement;
    • Member States should consider policy solutions that would allow for the elimination of all remaining legal loopholes that could facilitate the “laundering” of illegally sourced wildlife and wildlife products; exhaustive monitoring should be carried out in this connection;
    • the EU should consider a possible ban at European level of trade, export or re-export within and outside the EU of elephant ivory, in a manner compliant with WTO law;
    • sufficient resources should be committed for policies and measures designed to meet the EU’s objectives in terms of combating the illegal wildlife trade, which includes resources for third countries in terms of capacity-building;
    • the Commission and the Member States should continue to work with all actors concerned to ensure an integrated approach that acts to curtail demand and raise awareness in demand markets;
    • more should be done to ensure that the illegal criminal networks and syndicates active in illegal wildlife trade are targeted for disruption, elimination and prosecution, and that Member States should ensure that the punishments and sentences reserved for wildlife crime are both proportionate and dissuasive and in line with commitments, as defined in the UN Convention against Transnational Organised Crime;
    • the EU should explore, within the scope of the WTO framework, how global trade and environmental regimes can better support each other;
    • lastly, further opportunities for cooperation between the WTO and CITES should be explored, in particular in terms of offering technical assistance and capacity building on trade and environment matters to officials from developing countries.
activities/1/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: FJELLNER Christofer group: S&D name: MARTIN David group: ALDE name: TAKKULA Hannu group: GUE/NGL name: MINEUR Anne-Marie group: Verts/ALE name: JADOT Yannick group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2016-02-15T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma
activities/1/date
Old
2017-03-02T00:00:00
New
2017-01-24T00:00:00
activities/1/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/2
date
2017-01-30T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0012&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0012/2017
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
activities/3/date
Old
2017-01-24T00:00:00
New
2017-03-02T00:00:00
activities/3/type
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
other/0/dg/url
Old
http://ec.europa.eu/trade/
New
http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/trade_en
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/2
date
2017-03-02T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/1
date
2017-01-24T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/0/committees/0/shadows
  • group: EPP name: FJELLNER Christofer
  • group: S&D name: MARTIN David
  • group: ALDE name: TAKKULA Hannu
  • group: GUE/NGL name: MINEUR Anne-Marie
  • group: Verts/ALE name: JADOT Yannick
  • group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana
committees/0/shadows
  • group: EPP name: FJELLNER Christofer
  • group: S&D name: MARTIN David
  • group: ALDE name: TAKKULA Hannu
  • group: GUE/NGL name: MINEUR Anne-Marie
  • group: Verts/ALE name: JADOT Yannick
  • group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana
activities
  • date: 2016-04-28T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2016-02-15T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2016-02-15T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/ title: Trade commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
INTA/8/06284
reference
2016/2054(INI)
title
EU common commercial policy in the context of wildlife sustainability imperatives
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Awaiting committee decision
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject