BETA


2016/2144(INI) EU funds for gender equality

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead FEMM MOODY Clare (icon: S&D S&D) MATERA Barbara (icon: PPE PPE), WIŚNIEWSKA Jadwiga (icon: ECR ECR), MLINAR Angelika (icon: ALDE ALDE), FORENZA Eleonora (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), VANA Monika (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), AIUTO Daniela (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Committee Opinion BUDG GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL Eider (icon: S&D S&D) Anneli JÄÄTTEENMÄKI (icon: ALDE ALDE), Sophie MONTEL (icon: ENF ENF), Liadh NÍ RIADA (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Committee Opinion CONT FLANAGAN Luke Ming (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL) Nedzhmi ALI (icon: ALDE ALDE), Inés AYALA SENDER (icon: S&D S&D), Patricija ŠULIN (icon: PPE PPE)
Committee Opinion EMPL
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2017/08/22
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2017/03/14
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2017/03/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 437 votes to 166, with 80 abstentions, a resolution on the EU funds for gender equality.

Members noted that gender issues are usually more often addressed in “soft” policy areas, such as human resources development, rather than in “hard” ones, such as infrastructure and ICT, which receive higher financial support.

The resolution called for European funding to be used more proactively in order to achieve gender equality goals.

European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI Funds) : in order to enhance female participation in the labour market and women's economic independence, Parliament called for the use of appropriate tools and incentives , including the European Funds such as ESF, the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), ensuring the necessary social infrastructure funding for the provision of quality, affordable and accessible care services for children and other dependent persons, including elderly dependents and family members with disabilities.

In general, use should be made of the potential of cross‑cutting financing opportunities under ESI funds to support projects aimed at promoting gender equality.

Rights, Equality and Citizenship 2014-2020 programme (REC) : Members regretted that the Daphne programme for combating violence against women has no separate budget line, given that it is currently one of the specific objectives of the REC programme . Deploring the decrease in the funds available for the Daphne specific objective (EUR 20 million in 2011 compared to EUR 14 million foreseen for 2016), Parliament called for Daphne to be provided with sufficient financial support and for its visibility and highly successful profile to be maintained.

The resolution called for priority to be given to organisations dealing with the prevention of violence and supporting victims of all forms of violence. The Commission should increase support for European networks on gender equality themes as well as for gender equality initiatives such as the European Charter for Equality of Women and Men in Local Life.

Horizon 2020 programme (research and innovation) : Parliament recalled the three mainstreaming objectives under the Horizon 2020 programme , namely: (i) to foster equal opportunities and gender balance in project teams; (ii) to ensure gender balance in decision-making; and (iii) to integrate a gender dimension into research content.

They called for:

gender mainstreaming to be further strengthened within this programme, and for the development of gender equality targets in strategies, programmes and projects at all stages of the research cycle; the maintenance of an independent line of funding for gender-specific structural change projects as well as of other gender equality topics in research and innovation.

As regards other instruments , Parliament called:

for the introduction of a requirement for a gender-sensitive analysis into the EU Solidarity Fund when evaluating the impact on populations following natural disasters and in particular on the impact on women: for the allocation of EU development funds for voluntary, modern family planning and reproductive health services; for gender mainstreaming to be included among the founding principles of the recent Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF).

Strategic recommendations : Parliament regretted the Commission’s decision not to address the issue of implementing gender mainstreaming in its mid-term review of the multi-annual financial framework .

It recommended in particular:

integrating and implementing strong and effective gender budgeting and gender mainstreaming in the post-2020 generation of EU funding programmes, with a view to increasing EU funding for measures to combat gender discrimination; for gender-specific indicators to be applied in the project selection, monitoring and evaluation phases of all actions that receive funding from the EU budget; for the close monitoring of the effectiveness of national complaints bodies and procedures in the implementation of gender equality directives.

Documents
2017/03/14
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2017/03/13
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2017/02/08
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Details

The Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality adopted an own-initiative report by Clare MOODY (S&D, UK) on EU funds for gender equality.

Members noted that gender issues are usually more often addressed in “soft” policy areas, such as human resources development, rather than in “hard” ones, such as infrastructure and ICT, which receive higher financial support.

This report assesses how gender mainstreaming is applied in the EU funds.

European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI Funds) : the report pointed out that the ESI Funds constitutes the most important financial support for the implementation of gender equality policy in the EU, especially in the case of the European Social Fund (ESF), which aims to foster the full integration of women in the labour market.

In order to enhance female participation in the labour market and women's economic independence, Members called for the use of appropriate tools and incentives , including the European Funds such as ESF, the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), ensuring the necessary social infrastructure funding for the provision of quality, affordable and accessible care services for children and other dependent persons, including elderly dependents and family members with disabilities.

The report invited the Commission to propose new targeted actions aimed at encouraging women's participation in the labour market, such as a specific programme financed by the EAFRD to support female entrepreneurship.

Rights, Equality and Citizenship 2014-2020 programme (REC) : Members regretted that the Daphne programme for combating violence against women has no separate budget line, given that it is currently one of the specific objectives of the REC programme . Members emphasised the need for Daphne to be provided with sufficient financial support and for its visibility and highly successful profile to be maintained.

The Commission is called upon to increase support for European networks on gender equality themes and to bolster the requirement for the collection of gender disaggregated data in the implementation of this programme.

Horizon 2020 programme (research and innovation) : Members recalled the three mainstreaming objectives under the Horizon 2020 programme , namely: (i) to foster equal opportunities and gender balance in project teams; (ii) to ensure gender balance in decision-making; and (iii) to integrate a gender dimension into research content.

They called for:

gender mainstreaming to be further strengthened within this programme, and for the development of gender equality targets in strategies, programmes and projects at all stages of the research cycle; the maintenance of an independent line of funding for gender-specific structural change projects as well as of other gender equality topics in research and innovation.

As regards other instruments, the report called on the Commission to introduce a requirement for a gender-sensitive analysis into the EU Solidarity Fund when evaluating the impact on populations following natural disasters and in particular on the impact on women.

Members also stated that gender mainstreaming should also be included among the founding principles of the recent Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF).

The report called for strategic recommendations on how to better internalise the EU declared principle of gender equality and gender mainstreaming in the budget allocation and spending decisions of the EU policy areas.

Members called for, inter alia :

the EU-level funding of EUR 6.17 billion allocated in the current multiannual framework (MFF) for achieving the objectives of gender-strategic engagement as a first step to be increased in the next MFF; gender-specific indicators to be applied in the project selection, monitoring and evaluation phases of all actions that receive funding from the EU budget; the Commission to monitor closely the effectiveness of national complaints bodies and procedures in the implementation of gender equality directives.

Documents
2017/01/25
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2017/01/19
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/12/16
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2016/12/12
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/11/16
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2016/10/19
   EP - FLANAGAN Luke Ming (GUE/NGL) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2016/09/15
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2016/09/12
   EP - MOODY Clare (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM
2016/06/15
   EP - GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL Eider (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0033/2017 - Clare Moody - § 35/2

2017/03/14 Outcome: +: 453, -: 172, 0: 56
ES GB DE IT FR BE PT RO SE EL FI BG CZ LV DK CY NL LU AT LT EE IE SI SK HR HU MT PL
Total
49
63
88
62
63
20
21
30
18
19
13
13
19
8
12
6
23
5
18
11
5
8
8
13
11
18
6
50
icon: S&D S&D
175

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: PPE PPE
200

Sweden PPE

Against (1)

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

Abstain (1)

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3

Slovenia PPE

For (1)

5
5
icon: ECR ECR
66

Italy ECR

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1
2

Bulgaria ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Czechia ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

3

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
15

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

2

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Poland ENF

2

A8-0033/2017 - Clare Moody - § 52

2017/03/14 Outcome: -: 333, +: 327, 0: 22
IT ES SE RO PT DE EE CY FI BE IE EL MT LU AT SI DK LT HR CZ NL LV SK BG GB HU FR PL
Total
62
47
18
30
21
89
6
6
12
21
8
20
6
6
18
8
12
11
11
20
23
8
13
13
62
18
63
49
icon: S&D S&D
176

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Sweden ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Germany ALDE

For (1)

3

Estonia ALDE

3

Finland ALDE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
37

Sweden EFDD

2

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

Hungary NI

2

France NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ECR ECR
66

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2
icon: PPE PPE
201

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Ireland PPE

3

Malta PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

3
5

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0033/2017 - Clare Moody - § 55/2

2017/03/14 Outcome: +: 480, -: 116, 0: 87
DE ES IT GB FR RO BE SE AT PT NL EL FI BG CZ DK LV LU CY LT EE HU IE SI HR SK MT PL
Total
89
49
60
62
63
30
21
18
18
21
22
19
13
13
20
12
8
6
6
11
6
18
8
8
11
13
6
51
icon: S&D S&D
175

Netherlands S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Malta S&D

For (1)

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Germany ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2
icon: PPE PPE
201

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

1

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

Slovenia PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

5
6
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ECR ECR
66

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1
2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

3
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3

France NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Germany ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Austria ENF

For (1)

4

Netherlands ENF

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Poland ENF

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

A8-0033/2017 - Clare Moody - Am 2

2017/03/14 Outcome: +: 430, -: 179, 0: 67
ES DE FR IT BE PT GB RO SE NL CZ FI EL DK LU CY IE BG EE LT HR SK AT SI LV MT HU PL
Total
49
88
63
61
21
20
63
30
18
22
20
13
19
12
6
5
8
10
5
10
11
13
18
8
8
5
18
51
icon: S&D S&D
174

Netherlands S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Portugal ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3
2

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3
icon: PPE PPE
196

Sweden PPE

Against (1)

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3

Bulgaria PPE

4

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

3
5

Slovenia PPE

5

Latvia PPE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Malta PPE

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
37

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
66

Italy ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Finland ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

3

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

Abstain (1)

3

Poland ENF

2

A8-0033/2017 - Clare Moody - § 56/2

2017/03/14 Outcome: +: 425, -: 176, 0: 78
DE IT GB FR ES BE PT NL RO SE EL FI CZ DK CY LV LU BG EE AT SI LT IE HR SK MT HU PL
Total
87
63
62
64
48
20
21
23
29
17
19
13
20
12
6
7
6
13
6
18
8
11
8
11
13
6
17
50
icon: S&D S&D
177

Netherlands S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Malta S&D

For (1)

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

Germany ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
15

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3

France NI

2

Hungary NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
66

Italy ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

1

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

3
icon: ENF ENF
36

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Poland ENF

2
icon: PPE PPE
198

Sweden PPE

Against (1)

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

Abstain (1)

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

5

Lithuania PPE

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland PPE

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3
5

A8-0033/2017 - Clare Moody - § 56/3

2017/03/14 Outcome: +: 407, -: 203, 0: 59
GB IT ES FR BE NL DE SE FI PT RO IE DK MT LU CZ EL EE CY LT HR AT LV BG SI SK HU PL
Total
60
61
48
64
21
22
86
18
13
21
28
8
11
6
6
20
20
5
5
11
11
18
8
12
8
12
18
47
icon: S&D S&D
172

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

Abstain (1)

2

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Sw