{"change_dates":[],"dossier":{"amendments":[],"changes":{"2016-12-16T02:29:55":[{"data":[{"body":"EP/CSL","date":"2016-11-24T00:00:00","type":"Initial period for examining delegated act 1 month(s)"},{"body":"EC","commission":[],"date":"2016-11-24T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"C(2016)07495","type":"Non-legislative basic document published","url":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/actes_delegues/2016/07495/COM_ADL(2016)07495_EN.pdf"}],"type":"Non-legislative basic document published"},{"body":"EP/CSL","date":"2016-12-12T00:00:00","type":"Delegated act not objected by Council"},{"body":"EP/CSL","date":"2016-12-14T00:00:00","type":"Initial period for examining delegated act extended at Parliament's request by 1 month(s)"},{"body":"EP","date":"2017-01-19T00:00:00","type":"Vote in plenary scheduled"}],"path":["activities"],"type":"added"},{"data":[],"path":["other"],"type":"added"},{"data":[{"body":"EP","committee":"ECON","committee_full":"Economic and Monetary Affairs","responsible":true},{"body":"EP","committee":"LIBE","committee_full":"Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs","responsible":true}],"path":["committees"],"type":"added"},{"data":{},"path":["links"],"type":"added"},{"data":{"reference":"2016/3007(DEA)","stage_reached":"Preparatory phase in Parliament","subject":["7.30.20 Action to combat terrorism","7.30.30.08 Capital outflow, money laundering"],"subtype":"Examination of delegated act","summary":["Supplementing"],"title":"Identifying high-risk third countries with strategic deficiencies","type":"DEA - Delegated acts procedure"},"path":["procedure"],"type":"added"}],"2016-12-18T02:28:02":[{"data":{"body":"EP","committees":[{"body":"EP","committee":"ECON","committee_full":"Economic and Monetary Affairs","responsible":true},{"body":"EP","committee":"LIBE","committee_full":"Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs","responsible":true}],"date":"2016-12-14T00:00:00","type":"Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading"},"path":["activities",3],"type":"added"},{"data":"CJ12/8/08555","path":["procedure","dossier_of_the_committee"],"type":"added"},{"data":["Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 055"],"path":["procedure","legal_basis"],"type":"added"},{"data":["Preparatory phase in Parliament","Awaiting committee decision"],"path":["procedure","stage_reached"],"type":"changed"}],"2017-01-11T02:36:37":[{"data":"Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 105-p3","path":["procedure","legal_basis",1],"type":"added"},{"data":["Awaiting committee decision","Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage"],"path":["procedure","stage_reached"],"type":"changed"}],"2017-01-21T03:49:39":[{"data":{"body":"EP","date":"2017-01-19T00:00:00","type":"Vote in plenary scheduled"},"path":["activities",5],"type":"deleted"}],"2017-02-02T03:23:15":[{"data":{"body":"EP","date":"2017-01-19T00:00:00","docs":[{"title":"T8-0008/2017","type":"Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading","url":"http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0008"}],"type":"Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading"},"path":["activities",5],"type":"added"},{"data":["Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage","Procedure completed - delegated act rejected"],"path":["procedure","stage_reached"],"type":"changed"}],"2017-02-16T18:38:41":[{"data":["
The European Parliament adopted by 393 votes to 67,\nwith 210 abstentions, a resolution objecting to a Commission\nDelegated Regulation of 24 November 2016 amending Commission\nDelegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 supplementing Directive (EU)\n2015/849 by identifying high-risk third countries with strategic\ndeficiencies.
\nThe Delegated Regulation, its annex and the amending\nDelegated Regulation are meant to identify high-risk third\ncountries with strategic deficiencies as regards anti-money\nlaundering and countering terrorist financing (AML/CTF), which\nrepresent a threat for the EU financial system and for which\nenhanced customer due diligence measures are necessary at EU\nobliged entities under Directive\n(EU) 2015/849 (4AMLD) on the prevention of the use of the\nfinancial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist\nfinancing.
\nParliament believes that the list of criteria\nestablished by the Commission which corresponds to those\nlaid down by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) - is\nnon-exhaustive and that it should be extended to include\ninclude territories that facilitate tax crimes.
\nStressing that the Commission assessment must be a\nfully independent and non-politicised process, Members expect the\nCommission to conduct its own assessment and to avoid\nrelying solely on external information sources.
\nThe evidence gathered by the Parliaments two\nSpecial Committees, Committee on Tax Rulings and Other Measures\nSimilar in Nature or Effect and the Inquiry Committee on Money\nLaundering, Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion indicates that some\ncountries not included in the present list of high-risk third\ncountries may present such deficiencies.
\nOn the basis of these considerations, Parliament\ncalled on the Commission to submit a new delegated act which\ntakes account of the concerns set out above.
\nThe European Parliament adopted by 393 votes to 67,\nwith 210 abstentions, a resolution objecting to a Commission\nDelegated Regulation of 24 November 2016 amending Commission\nDelegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 supplementing Directive (EU)\n2015/849 by identifying high-risk third countries with strategic\ndeficiencies.
\nThe Delegated Regulation, its annex and the amending\nDelegated Regulation are meant to identify high-risk third\ncountries with strategic deficiencies as regards anti-money\nlaundering and countering terrorist financing (AML/CTF), which\nrepresent a threat for the EU financial system and for which\nenhanced customer due diligence measures are necessary at EU\nobliged entities under Directive\n(EU) 2015/849 (4AMLD) on the prevention of the use of the\nfinancial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist\nfinancing.
\nParliament believes that the list of criteria\nestablished by the Commission which corresponds to those\nlaid down by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) - is\nnon-exhaustive and that it should be extended to include\ninclude territories that facilitate tax crimes.
\nStressing that the Commission assessment must be a\nfully independent and non-politicised process, Members expect the\nCommission to conduct its own assessment and to avoid\nrelying solely on external information sources.
\nThe evidence gathered by the Parliaments two\nSpecial Committees, Committee on Tax Rulings and Other Measures\nSimilar in Nature or Effect and the Inquiry Committee on Money\nLaundering, Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion indicates that some\ncountries not included in the present list of high-risk third\ncountries may present such deficiencies.
\nOn the basis of these considerations, Parliament\ncalled on the Commission to submit a new delegated act which\ntakes account of the concerns set out above.
\nThe European Parliament adopted by 393 votes to 67,\nwith 210 abstentions, a resolution objecting to a Commission\nDelegated Regulation of 24 November 2016 amending Commission\nDelegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 supplementing Directive (EU)\n2015/849 by identifying high-risk third countries with strategic\ndeficiencies.
\nThe Delegated Regulation, its annex and the amending\nDelegated Regulation are meant to identify high-risk third\ncountries with strategic deficiencies as regards anti-money\nlaundering and countering terrorist financing (AML/CTF), which\nrepresent a threat for the EU financial system and for which\nenhanced customer due diligence measures are necessary at EU\nobliged entities under Directive\n(EU) 2015/849 (4AMLD) on the prevention of the use of the\nfinancial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist\nfinancing.
\nParliament believes that the list of criteria\nestablished by the Commission which corresponds to those\nlaid down by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) - is\nnon-exhaustive and that it should be extended to include\nterritories that facilitate tax crimes.
\nStressing that the Commission assessment must be a\nfully independent and non-politicised process, Members expect the\nCommission to conduct its own assessment and to avoid\nrelying solely on external information sources.
\nThe evidence gathered by the Parliaments two\nSpecial Committees, the Committee on Tax Rulings and Other Measures\nSimilar in Nature or Effect and the Inquiry Committee on Money\nLaundering, Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion indicates that some\ncountries not included in the present list of high-risk third\ncountries may present such deficiencies.
\nOn the basis of these considerations, Parliament\ncalled on the Commission to submit a new delegated act which\ntakes account of the concerns set out above.
\nThe European Parliament adopted by 393 votes to 67,\nwith 210 abstentions, a resolution objecting to a Commission\nDelegated Regulation of 24 November 2016 amending Commission\nDelegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 supplementing Directive (EU)\n2015/849 by identifying high-risk third countries with strategic\ndeficiencies.
\nThe Delegated Regulation, its annex and the amending\nDelegated Regulation are meant to identify high-risk third\ncountries with strategic deficiencies as regards anti-money\nlaundering and countering terrorist financing (AML/CTF), which\nrepresent a threat for the EU financial system and for which\nenhanced customer due diligence measures are necessary at EU\nobliged entities under Directive\n(EU) 2015/849 (4AMLD) on the prevention of the use of the\nfinancial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist\nfinancing.
\nParliament believes that the list of criteria\nestablished by the Commission which corresponds to those\nlaid down by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) - is\nnon-exhaustive and that it should be extended to include\nterritories that facilitate tax crimes.
\nStressing that the Commission assessment must be a\nfully independent and non-politicised process, Members expect the\nCommission to conduct its own assessment and to avoid\nrelying solely on external information sources.
\nThe evidence gathered by the Parliaments two\nSpecial Committees, the Committee on Tax Rulings and Other Measures\nSimilar in Nature or Effect and the Inquiry Committee on Money\nLaundering, Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion indicates that some\ncountries not included in the present list of high-risk third\ncountries may present such deficiencies.
\nOn the basis of these considerations, Parliament\ncalled on the Commission to submit a new delegated act which\ntakes account of the concerns set out above.
\n