Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ECON | KARAS Othmar ( PPE), BERÈS Pervenche ( S&D) | LOONES Sander ( ECR), KLINZ Wolf ( ALDE), GIEGOLD Sven ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | AFCO | CASTALDO Fabio Massimo ( EFDD) | Elmar BROK ( PPE), Morten MESSERSCHMIDT ( ECR), Jasenko SELIMOVIC ( ALDE) |
Committee Opinion | JURI | ||
Committee Opinion | BUDG | GEIER Jens ( S&D) | Nedzhmi ALI ( ALDE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114
Legal Basis:
TFEU 114Subjects
Events
The Commission presented a report on the European Banking Authority's (EBA) compliance with the requirements regarding the establishment of its seat.
In the context of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the Union, the EBA Regulation had to be amended to move the headquarters from London to Paris. In addition to the change of seat, the amendment to the EBA regulation also introduced new requirements for EBA in relation to its seat and an obligation for the Commission to publish a report by 30 March 2019 and every 12 months thereafter on EBA’s compliance with these requirements.
The EBA provided the necessary input to fulfill these reporting requirements. This first report under the new reporting obligation is published after 30 March 2019 since full operations in Paris did not start until 3 June 2019.
According to the information available, the report concludes that the performance of the EBA's tasks and competences, its governance structure, its main organisation and the financing of its activities have not been affected by the transfer of the EBA headquarters to Paris, nor by the administrative arrangements for cooperation with the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA), which are not linked to the core activities of the EBA.
The report notes in particular the following points:
Headquarters agreement
The agreement was signed at a ceremony in Paris on 6 March 2019 and has not affected the EBA’s operations and governance. The agreement: (i) establishes the privilege for staff relocating from London to Paris of purchasing a car tax–free within twelve months of relocation, a privilege that has been extended to staff with French nationality; (ii) commits the French government to engage in a process to establish a European School in the Paris Region.
The EBA has also engaged with the Protocol office of the French Ministry of Europe and Foreign Affairs and with the French customs authorities to ensure a smooth process in relation to the arrival of staff and their families in France, the provision of special residence permits, and the application of tax privileges to the EBA.
Governance
The EBA received special funding from the French government to assist with the relocation costs:
- EUR 1.5 million to be used as a contribution to the costs of fitting out the Paris offices. This has been received and paid;
- EUR 7 million to be used as a contribution to the rent and building charges of the Paris offices. To date the EBA has received EUR 2.5 million of this amount. The balance will be received over the duration of the lease on the offices in Paris.
Until the arrival of the EBA’s new Chairperson on 1 May 2019, the EBA’s alternate chairperson acted as the EBA’s Interim Chairperson.
Senior management has been operative from Paris as of 30 March 2019 where EBA secured limited temporary offices in the Europlaza building (the building of the new premises of the EBA). Full operations in Paris started on 3 June 2019 when all staff took up their duties in the EBA’s new headquarters in the Europlaza building.
EBA data centre relocation
With its data centre hosting contracts expiring in 2019, EBA decided to migrate its data centre to an Interagency Community Cloud environment, in line with its hosting strategy and ahead of the expected March 2019 Brexit date.
EBA, in close collaboration with the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA), designed, planned, contracted and fully implemented the transfer of its hosted data and infrastructure services. This ensured no disruption to the Agency’s activities.
The EBA has joined two inter-institutional procurement procedures led by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA): for information and communications technology (ICT) consultancy services, and for facility management consultancy services.
PURPOSE: to relocate the seat of the European Banking Authority following the notification by the United Kingdom to the European Council of its intention to leave the Union.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) 2018/1717 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 as regards the location of the seat of the European Banking Authority.
CONTENT: this Regulation amends Regulation (EC) No 1093/2010 in order to establish the location of the seat of the European Banking Authority (EBA) in Paris, France .
Following the United Kingdom's notification of its intention to withdraw from the Union, the other 27 Member States, meeting on 20 November 2017 in the margins of the Council, chose Paris, France, as the new seat of the EBA.
The transfer of the seat of the Authority does not call into question the establishment plan as adopted by the European Parliament and the Council, nor the application of the Staff Regulations to officials or other agents who work at the Authority.
The relocation of the Authority should not have any consequences with regard to the execution of the distinct mandates of the European Supervisory Authorities or the maintenance of their separate legal status. The relocation might allow, where applicable, for the sharing among Union agencies of administrative support services and facility management services which are not related to core activities.
By 30 March 2019 at the latest and every 12 months thereafter, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and the Council on the compliance of the European Supervisory Authorities with this requirement.
Given the United Kingdom's commitment to contribute to the general budget of the Union for the financial years 2019 and 2020 as if it remained in the Union and to contribute to its share of the financing of the commitments outstanding at 31 December 2020, the costs of relocation of the seat of the Authority arising from the decision of the United Kingdom to withdraw from the Union are to be borne by all Union taxpayers through the general budget of the Union.
The United Kingdom has offered to discuss with those Union agencies that are located in London how they could reduce their withdrawal costs.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 16.11.2018.
APPLICATION: from 30.3.2019.
The European Parliament adopted by 462 votes to 48, with 40 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 as regards the location of the seat of the European Banking Authority (EBA).
The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows:
Following the notification by the United Kingdom on 29 March 2017 of its intention to withdraw from the Union, the Commission proposed to amend Regulation (EC) No 1093/2010 in order to re locate the EBA's headquarters to Paris , France.
The amended text specifies that the location of the seat of the Authority shall not affect the Authority’s execution of its tasks and powers , the organisation of its governance structure, the operation of its main organisation, or the main financing of its activities.
The transfer of the seat of the Authority does not call into question the establishment plan as adopted by the European Parliament and the Council, nor the application of the Staff Regulations to officials or other agents who work at the Authority.
The relocation of the Authority should not have any consequences with regard to the execution of the distinct mandates of the European Supervisory Authorities or the maintenance of their separate legal status. The relocation might allow, where applicable, for the sharing among Union agencies of administrative support services and facility management services which are not related to core activities.
In its legislative resolution, Parliament stressed that the new premises should be ready and fit for the purpose of permanent relocation by 30 March 2019.
In addition, Members deplored that Parliament was not involved in the definition and the weighting of the criteria to select the location of the seat of the EBA despite Parliament's prerogatives.
They also deplored the lack of transparency and accountability , in the voting procedure the Council has undertaken on the 20 November 2017, leaving final decisions to the drawing of lots.
Members considered that Parliament should be systematically and on equal terms with the Commission and Council involved in defining and weighting the criteria for the location of all Union bodies and agencies. They requested the Commission and Council to launch a revision of the Joint Statement of 19 July 2012 on decentralised agencies with the aim of ensuring a strong involvement of Parliament whilst respecting in particular its co-decision powers.
In a statement to the legislative resolution , Parliament recognised the commitment of sincere and transparent cooperation, and in the light of the process followed for the relocation of the EMA and EBA, which was specific to the situation and did not constitute a precedent for location of agencies in the future.
The Council took note of the request by Parliament to revise, as soon as possible, the 2012 Joint Statement and Common Approach on decentralised Agencies. As a first step, it invited the Commission to provide, by April 2019, an in-depth analysis of the implementation of the Joint Statement and Common Approach as regards the location of decentralised Agencies.
The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the report prepared jointly by Burkhard BALZ (EPP, DE) and Pervenche BERÈS (S&D, FR) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 as regards the location of the seat of the European Banking Authority (EBA).
In the context of the United Kingdom's notification on 29 March 2017 of its intention to leave the Union, the Commission proposed to amend Regulation (EC) No 1093/2010 with a view to establishing the seat of the EBA in Paris, France.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission's proposal so as to make it clear that the relocation of the EBA shall not have any consequences with regard to executing the distinct mandate or maintaining the separate legal status of the European Supervisory Authorities, namely the European Banking Authority (EBA), the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA). At the latest on the date of application of the Regulation and every 12 months thereafter, the Commission shall report on the compliance of those Authorities with that requirement.
The relocation of the EBA might allow, where applicable, for the sharing of administrative support services and facility management services among Union agencies which are not related to core activities.
The new premises should be ready and fit for the purpose of permanent relocation by the time the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union comes into effect. Furthermore, they stressed that the transfer of the seat of the EBA does not call into question the establishment plan as adopted by the European Parliament and the Council, nor the application of the Staff Regulations to officials or other agents who work at the EBA.
In a statement annexed to the draft Regulation, the European Parliament regretted that its role of co-legislator has not been duly taken into account since it was not involved in the procedure leading to the selection of the new seat of the European Banking Authority (EBA). They condemned the procedure followed for the selection of the new location of the seat, which has de facto deprived the European Parliament of its prerogatives since it was not effectively involved in the process, but is now expected to simply confirm the selection made for the new location of the seat by means of the ordinary legislative procedure.
Under these conditions, the European Parliament insisted that the procedure followed for the selection of a new location for the agencies will be revised and not used anymore in this form in the future.
PURPOSE: to relocate the seat of the European Banking Authority following the notification by the United Kingdom to the European Council of its intention to leave the Union.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 establishing the European Banking Authority (EBA), the EBA is established in London, UK.
Following the notification by the United Kingdom of its intention to leave the Union , the 27 remaining Member States, in the margins of the General Affairs Council (Article 50), selected Paris, France, as the new seat for the European Banking Authority
CONTENT: the Commission proposes to amend Regulation (EC) No 1093/2010 in order to confirm the new seat of the EBA in Paris, France.
The EBA should occupy its new seat from the date on which the Treaties cease to apply to the United Kingdom or from 30 March 2019, whichever is the earlier.
It is proposed that the Regulation shall enter into force as a matter of urgency in order to give the European Banking Authority sufficient time to relocate.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: the relocation of the European Banking Authority will have budgetary implications, in particular in view of the costs related to the early termination of its current rental contract in London as a consequence of the withdrawal, the costs related to the move itself and the costs related to the installation in the new premises in Paris.
As set out in the negotiation directives of the Council of 22 May 2017, the United Kingdom should fully cover the specific costs related to the withdrawal process, such as the relocation of the agencies based in the United Kingdom.
Some of the relocation costs (e.g. costs related to the move itself) may have to be pre-financed by the EU budget prior to the final financial settlement. If necessary, the Commission will submit the relevant proposals to the European Parliament and the Council in the framework of the annual budgetary procedure for 2019 and, if necessary, for 2018.
In addition, the costs related to the installation in the new premises will also be presented in the context of the building procedure set out in Article 203 of the Financial Regulation, which requires prior approval from the European Parliament and the Council before contracts related to building projects are concluded. This procedure is expected to be launched as soon as possible (at the latest in early 2018).
Documents
- Follow-up document: COM(2022)0387
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2021)0771
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2020)0317
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2019)0451
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)755
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2018/1717
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 291 16.11.2018, p. 0001
- Draft final act: 00039/2018/LEX
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T8-0426/2018
- Committee letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: PE629.618
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE629.454
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: PE629.454
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: PE629.618
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A8-0153/2018
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE619.350
- Committee opinion: PE616.580
- Committee opinion: PE616.916
- Committee draft report: PE616.660
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES5890/2017
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2017)0734
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES5890/2017
- Committee draft report: PE616.660
- Committee opinion: PE616.916
- Committee opinion: PE616.580
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE619.350
- Committee letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: PE629.618
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE629.454
- Draft final act: 00039/2018/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)755
- Follow-up document: COM(2019)0451 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2020)0317 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2021)0771 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2022)0387 EUR-Lex
Votes
A8-0153/2018 - Othmar Karas et Pervenche Berès - Am 2 25/10/2018 12:57:00.000 #
FR | DE | ES | PL | RO | IT | BE | NL | SE | CZ | FI | PT | SK | HU | LT | AT | LV | BG | LU | EE | IE | HR | SI | MT | EL | DK | ?? | GB | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
68
|
72
|
43
|
38
|
26
|
50
|
19
|
22
|
13
|
16
|
11
|
17
|
11
|
10
|
9
|
13
|
7
|
9
|
6
|
6
|
5
|
6
|
5
|
4
|
7
|
5
|
2
|
49
|
|
PPE |
156
|
France PPEFor (17) |
Germany PPEFor (28)Albert DESS, Andreas SCHWAB, Angelika NIEBLER, Axel VOSS, Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN, Daniel CASPARY, David MCALLISTER, Dennis RADTKE, Elmar BROK, Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, Ingeborg GRÄSSLE, Jens GIESEKE, Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Manfred WEBER, Markus FERBER, Markus PIEPER, Michael GAHLER, Monika HOHLMEIER, Norbert LINS, Peter JAHR, Peter LIESE, Rainer WIELAND, Renate SOMMER, Sabine VERHEYEN, Stefan GEHROLD, Thomas MANN, Werner KUHN, Werner LANGEN
|
11
|
Poland PPEFor (17)Adam SZEJNFELD, Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA, Andrzej GRZYB, Barbara KUDRYCKA, Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI, Bogdan Brunon WENTA, Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI, Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA, Danuta Maria HÜBNER, Dariusz ROSATI, Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA, Janusz LEWANDOWSKI, Jarosław KALINOWSKI, Jarosław WAŁĘSA, Julia PITERA, Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN, Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
11
|
Italy PPEFor (8) |
3
|
3
|
Czechia PPEFor (6) |
2
|
Portugal PPEFor (6) |
5
|
Hungary PPEFor (7) |
1
|
4
|
4
|
5
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
||||
S&D |
142
|
Germany S&DFor (19) |
2
|
10
|
Italy S&DFor (23)Andrea COZZOLINO, Brando BENIFEI, Caterina CHINNICI, Damiano ZOFFOLI, Daniele VIOTTI, David Maria SASSOLI, Elena GENTILE, Elly SCHLEIN, Enrico GASBARRA, Flavio ZANONATO, Giuseppe FERRANDINO, Isabella DE MONTE, Luigi MORGANO, Massimo PAOLUCCI, Michela GIUFFRIDA, Nicola CAPUTO, Nicola DANTI, Paolo DE CASTRO, Patrizia TOIA, Pier Antonio PANZERI, Renata BRIANO, Roberto GUALTIERI, Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI
|
4
|
3
|
5
|
2
|
2
|
Portugal S&DFor (6) |
3
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (4) |
||||
ALDE |
53
|
France ALDEFor (7) |
3
|
3
|
Belgium ALDE |
Netherlands ALDEFor (6) |
2
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
39
|
5
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (9)Abstain (1) |
Spain Verts/ALE |
2
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
|||||||||||||
ECR |
54
|
Germany ECRFor (1)Against (2)Abstain (1) |
1
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom ECR |
|||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
31
|
France GUE/NGL |
5
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
29
|
France ENFFor (14)Abstain (1) |
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
11
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
34
|
France EFDDAbstain (2) |
1
|
1
|
Italy EFDDAgainst (11) |
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (13) |
A8-0153/2018 - Othmar Karas et Pervenche Berès - Am 2 #
FR | DE | ES | PL | RO | IT | BE | NL | SE | CZ | FI | PT | SK | HU | LT | AT | LV | BG | LU | EE | IE | HR | SI | MT | EL | DK | ?? | GB | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total |
67
|
72
|
43
|
38
|
26
|
50
|
19
|
22
|
13
|
16
|
11
|
17
|
11
|
10
|
9
|
13
|
7
|
9
|
6
|
6
|
5
|
6
|
5
|
4
|
7
|
5
|
2
|
49
|
|
PPE |
156
|
France PPEFor (17) |
Germany PPEFor (28)Albert DESS, Andreas SCHWAB, Angelika NIEBLER, Axel VOSS, Birgit COLLIN-LANGEN, Daniel CASPARY, David MCALLISTER, Dennis RADTKE, Elmar BROK, Godelieve QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL, Ingeborg GRÄSSLE, Jens GIESEKE, Karl-Heinz FLORENZ, Manfred WEBER, Markus FERBER, Markus PIEPER, Michael GAHLER, Monika HOHLMEIER, Norbert LINS, Peter JAHR, Peter LIESE, Rainer WIELAND, Renate SOMMER, Sabine VERHEYEN, Stefan GEHROLD, Thomas MANN, Werner KUHN, Werner LANGEN
|
11
|
Poland PPEFor (17)Adam SZEJNFELD, Agnieszka KOZŁOWSKA, Andrzej GRZYB, Barbara KUDRYCKA, Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI, Bogdan Brunon WENTA, Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI, Danuta JAZŁOWIECKA, Danuta Maria HÜBNER, Dariusz ROSATI, Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA, Janusz LEWANDOWSKI, Jarosław KALINOWSKI, Jarosław WAŁĘSA, Julia PITERA, Róża THUN UND HOHENSTEIN, Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
|
11
|
Italy PPEFor (8) |
3
|
3
|
Czechia PPEFor (6) |
2
|
Portugal PPEFor (6) |
5
|
Hungary PPEFor (7) |
1
|
4
|
4
|
5
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
||||
S&D |
141
|
Germany S&DFor (19) |
2
|
10
|
Italy S&DFor (23)Andrea COZZOLINO, Brando BENIFEI, Caterina CHINNICI, Damiano ZOFFOLI, Daniele VIOTTI, David Maria SASSOLI, Elena GENTILE, Elly SCHLEIN, Enrico GASBARRA, Flavio ZANONATO, Giuseppe FERRANDINO, Isabella DE MONTE, Luigi MORGANO, Massimo PAOLUCCI, Michela GIUFFRIDA, Nicola CAPUTO, Nicola DANTI, Paolo DE CASTRO, Patrizia TOIA, Pier Antonio PANZERI, Renata BRIANO, Roberto GUALTIERI, Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI
|
4
|
3
|
5
|
2
|
2
|
Portugal S&DFor (6) |
3
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
United Kingdom S&DFor (4) |
||||
ALDE |
54
|
France ALDEFor (7) |
3
|
3
|
Belgium ALDE |
Netherlands ALDEFor (6) |
2
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||
Verts/ALE |
39
|
5
|
Germany Verts/ALEFor (9)Abstain (1) |
Spain Verts/ALE |
2
|
2
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
|||||||||||||
ECR |
54
|
Germany ECRFor (1)Against (2)Abstain (1) |
1
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom ECR |
|||||||||||||
GUE/NGL |
31
|
France GUE/NGL |
5
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||
ENF |
28
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
4
|
3
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
NI |
11
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
||||||||||||||||||||
EFDD |
34
|
France EFDDAbstain (2) |
1
|
1
|
Italy EFDDAgainst (11) |
1
|
1
|
United Kingdom EFDDAgainst (13) |
Amendments | Dossier |
22 |
2017/0326(COD)
2018/01/30
BUDG
4 amendments...
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The relocation of the European Banking Authority to Paris, France, opens a window of opportunity to create synergies in areas such as administration, IT and security between the European Banking Authority and ESMA, particularly since ESMA is due to launch a procurement procedure to find new office space as from late 2019; at the same time it is important to strictly distinguish between the tasks assigned to those agencies in their respective mandates and to maintain their independence from other the agencies located in Paris.
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The transfer of the European Banking Authority seat in no way calls into question the establishment plan as adopted by the budgetary authority or the application of the Staff Regulations of officials or other servants who work there.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The relocation of the European Banking Authority to Paris, France, opens a window of opportunity to readdress the overall framework of the European supervisory authorities. The fact that European Banking Authority and ESMA will both be located in Paris and benefiting from underlying synergies that will occur provides an opportunity to debate which changes need to be made to the whole system to upgrade it and provide a more resilient regulatory oversight.
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 Regulation 2010/1093/EU Article 7 – paragraph 1 “The Authority shall have its seat in Paris, France. The Authority shall seek close cooperation with other agencies of the Union, especially those that are based in its immediate proximity, in order to achieve efficiency gains.”
source: 616.850
2018/02/21
AFCO
3 amendments...
Amendment 3 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls for an immediate review of the Common Approach annexed to the joint statement of the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on decentralised agencies of 19 July 2012 to take due account of the role of the European Parliament in the decision- making process on the location of agencies in view of its prerogatives as co- legislator under the ordinary legislative procedure; calls therefore for a close involvement of the European Parliament in the decision making process concerning the location of agencies;
Amendment 4 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 1 a (new) Having regard to the Treaty on the European Union, and in particular Article 13(2) thereof,
source: 618.176
2018/03/22
ECON
15 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 5 5. Deplores the lack of transparency and accountability, in the voting procedure the Council has undertaken on the 20 November 2017, leaving final decisions to a draw; points to the fact that the agencies are currently partly funded by the Union budget and that also relocation costs may partly occur at the expense of the Union budget which are subject to ongoing negotiations between the European Union and the United Kingdom; highlights therefore the need for democratic accountability as well as a transparent and understandable decision-making in the interest of the European public; Requests further details on the weighting of the criteria applied by the Council in the selection procedure for the location of EBA
Amendment 11 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 6 6. Believes that the European Parliament should be systematically
Amendment 12 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Underlines that the revised Joint Statement on decentralised agencies of 19 July 2012 and any stronger role of the European Parliament provided by the Joint Statement should adequately respect the principle of geographical distribution as well as the equilibrium between large and small Member States;
Amendment 13 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. Notes that taken together, the six largest Member States currently hold more than 56% of the seats in the European Parliament; notes, as a consequence, that a stronger role for the European Parliament might negatively affect the chances for smaller Member States of hosting Union agencies;
Amendment 14 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 7 7. Highlights the different tasks and areas of competence of the European Supervisory Authorities EBA, EIOPA and ESMA; recalls the deliberate decision of the co-legislators to set up three authorities with separate tasks and fields of competence, one for banking, one for securities and one for insurance and pensions;
Amendment 15 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 7 7. Highlights the different tasks and areas of competence of the European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, EIOPA and ESMA); points to the need to grant them the financial and human resources necessary to guarantee their absolute impartiality and independence; recalls the deliberate decision of the co-legislators to set up three authorities with separate tasks and fields of competence, one for banking, one for securities and one for insurance and pensions; demands that this separation remains
Amendment 16 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 7 7. Highlights the different tasks and areas of competence of the European Supervisory Authorities EBA, EIOPA and ESMA; recalls the deliberate decision of the co-legislators to set up three authorities in three different Member States with separate tasks and fields of competence, one for banking, one for securities and one for insurance and pensions; regrets that the principle of having a location in three different Member States has been given up; demands that this separation remains to be reflected in the regulatory and supervisory competences and the governance, the main organisation and main financing of their activities independent of their location, while allowing for sharing, where applicable, administrative support services and facility management services which are not related to core activities, requests the Commission and Council to safeguard the current set-up of the three authorities during and after the relocation of EBA; demands a regular update from the Commission in this regard, in particular during the ongoing legislative procedure on the review of the European Supervisory authorities COM(2017)536; recalls that Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 is part of the legislative procedure under review of the European Supervisory Authorities COM(2017)536;
Amendment 17 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 18 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 9 9. Underlines that the relocation and the new premises need to be ready and fit by the time the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union comes into effect; highlights that any delay affecting the full functioning and operability of the EBA in the relocated site could cause excessive harmful effects on the implementation of consistent prudential regulation and supervision across the Union banking sector;
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) In the context of the United Kingdom's notification on 29 March 2017 of its intention to leave the Union, pursuant to Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union, the other 27 Member States, meeting in the margins of the General Affairs Council (‘Article 50’), selected Paris, France, as the new seat of the European Banking Authority. At the same time, another possible result of Brexit is harmful regulatory downward competition as financial hubs in the other 27 Member States scramble to attract business from London. To prevent that, the remaining Member States need to commit to strengthening common Union financial regulatory standards and practices and to coordinating wherever possible in order to manage the challenges of Brexit.
Amendment 5 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 2 a (new) - having regard to Article 295 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union as well as the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on Better Law-Making, which are committed to sincere and transparent cooperation throughout the entire legislative cycle and the equality of both co-legislators
Amendment 6 #
Draft legislative resolution Citation 4 a (new) - having regard to the Procedure leading up to a decision on the relocation of the European Medicines Agency and the European Banking Authority in the context of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the Union, as endorsed in the margins of the European Council (Article 50 TEU format) on 22 June 2017;
Amendment 7 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Deplores the fact that the Council missed the opportunity to negotiate with France on the European Parliament's double seat arrangement, and points out that having a double seat is incompatible with sustainable development, good governance, avoiding wasteful use of resources, supporting democratic decision-making, and gender equality objectives;
Amendment 8 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 3 3. Deplores that the European Parliament was not involved in the definition and the weighting of the criteria to select the location of the seat of the European Banking Authority (EBA) despite the European Parliament's prerogatives, whereby the European Parliament and the Council are equal co- legislators on Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 establishing the EBA and defining its location; believes that, given the relatively low number of establishment plan staff (170), it might have been possible to choose a more outlying location;
Amendment 9 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 5 5. Deplores the lack of transparency and accountability, in the voting procedure the Council has undertaken on the 20 November 2017, leaving final decisions to a draw; points to the fact that the agencies are currently partly funded by the Union budget and that also relocation costs may partly occur at the expense of the Union budget which are subject to ongoing negotiations between the European Union and the United Kingdom; stresses that most of the costs related to EBA's relocation should be borne by the Member State that has decided to leave the Union; highlights therefore the need for democratic accountability as well as a transparent and understandable decision- making in the interest of the European public; Requests further details on the weighting of the criteria applied by the Council in the selection procedure for the location of EBA;
source: 619.350
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/12 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7/date |
Old
2018-10-18T00:00:00New
2018-10-17T00:00:00 |
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:5890)(documentyear:2017)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:5890)(documentyear:2017)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE616.660New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-PR-616660_EN.html |
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE616.916&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFCO-AD-616916_EN.html |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE616.580&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-616580_EN.html |
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE619.350New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AM-619350_EN.html |
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=31083&j=0&l=en
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/docs/1 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/10 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/1 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/6/body |
EC
|
docs/7 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0153&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0153_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0426New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0426_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
ECON/8/11693New
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
committees/0/date |
2018-02-26T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/1/date |
2017-12-11T00:00:00
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/date |
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/2/shadows |
|
other/0 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
ECON/8/11693
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|