BETA
This is a historical view (2018/09/12)

Changes: 2024/01/30docs.date, 2022/09/02docs.docs.url, 2022/07/31docs.date, committees.rapporteur, 2022/05/04committees.rapporteur, 2022/04/27committees.rapporteur

View current state | View Changes for this date

Sorry, but we failed to recreate history before 2021-06-30T22:17:50


2017/0360(NLE) Determination of a clear risk of a serious breach by Poland of the rule of law
Next event: REGNER Evelyn (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM 2020/04/27 more...

Progress: Preparatory phase in Parliament

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead LIBE LÓPEZ AGUILAR Juan Fernando (icon: S&D S&D) METSOLA Roberta (icon: EPP EPP), ŠIMEČKA Michal (icon: Renew Renew), REINTKE Terry (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), BAY Nicolas (icon: ID ID), JAKI Patryk (icon: ECR ECR), ARVANITIS Konstantinos (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Former Responsible Committee LIBE
Committee Opinion AFCO
Committee Opinion FEMM REGNER Evelyn (icon: S&D S&D)
Former Committee Opinion AFCO PAGAZAURTUNDÚA Maite (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Legal Basis:
Treaty on European Union TEU 07-p1

Events

2020/04/27
   EP - REGNER Evelyn (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM
2019/10/14
   EP - LÓPEZ AGUILAR Juan Fernando (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2019/01/23
   FR_ASSEMBLY - Contribution
Documents
2018/12/11
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2018/12/11
   CSL - Council Meeting
2018/04/17
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2018/04/17
   CSL - Council Meeting
2018/02/26
   EP - PAGAZAURTUNDÚA Maite (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in AFCO
2017/12/20
   EP - Preparatory document
Details

PURPOSE: to determine a clear risk of a serious breach of the rule of law by Poland.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.

ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act.

BACKGROUND: the European Union is founded on a common set of values enshrined in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), which include the respect for the rule of law.

According to Article 7(1) TEU , on a reasoned proposal by one third of the Member States, by the European Parliament or by the European Commission, the Council, acting by a majority of four fifths of its members after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament, may determine that there is a clear risk of a serious breach by a Member State of the values referred to in Article 2.

In this reasoned proposal , the Commission presents its concerns regarding the lack of an independent and legitimate constitutional review and to the adoption in 2017 by the Polish Parliament of the law on the Supreme Court, the law on Ordinary Courts Organisation, the law on the National Council for the Judiciary and the law on the National School of Judiciary which contain provisions raising serious concerns as regards judicial independence, the separation of powers and legal certainty .

In particular, the main concerns relate to the new retirement regimes of Supreme Court judges and ordinary court judges, a new extraordinary appeal procedure in the Supreme Court, the dismissal and appointment of presidents of ordinary courts and the termination of the mandate and the appointment procedure of judges-members of the National Council for the Judiciary.

The Commission has carried out an extensive dialogue with the Polish authorities since January 2016 in order to find solutions to the concerns raised. On 20 December 2017, it adopted a further r ecommendation regarding the rule of law in Poland supplementing three previous recommendations adopted on 27 July 2016, 21 December 2016 and 27 July 2017. However, Poland failed to take the appropriate measures within the time set in this recommendation.

On 15 November 2017, the European Parliament adopted a resolution stating that the current situation in Poland represents a clear risk of a serious breach of EU values.

CONTENT: in accordance with Article 7(1) TEU, the Commission submits the present reasoned proposal to the Council inviting it to determine that there is a clear risk of a serious breach by Poland of the rule of law.

It recommended that Poland take the following actions within three months after notification of this Decision:

restore the independence and legitimacy of the Constitutional Tribunal as guarantor of the Polish Constitution by ensuring that its judges, its President and its Vice-President are lawfully elected and appointed; ensure that the law on the Supreme Court, the law on Ordinary Courts Organisation, the law on the National Council for the Judiciary and the law on the National School of Judiciary are amended in order to ensure their compliance with the requirements relating to the independence of the judiciary, the separation of powers and legal certainty; ensure that any justice reform is prepared in close cooperation with the judiciary and all interested parties, including the European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission); refrain from actions and public statements which could undermine further the legitimacy of the Constitutional Tribunal, the Supreme Court, the ordinary courts, the judges, individually or collectively, or the judiciary as a whole.

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/2
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
associated
False
rapporteur
name: REGNER Evelyn date: 2020-04-27T00:00:00 group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/3
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
associated
False
rapporteur
name: REGNER Evelyn date: 2020-04-27T00:00:00 group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
committees/0/shadows/5/group
Old
Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left
New
The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: LÓPEZ AGUILAR Juan Fernando date: 2019-10-14T00:00:00 group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: LÓPEZ AGUILAR Juan Fernando date: 2019-10-14T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
shadows
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
associated
False
rapporteur
name: REGNER Evelyn date: 2020-04-27T00:00:00 group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
associated
False
rapporteur
name: REGNER Evelyn date: 2020-04-27T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
committees/4
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
rapporteur
name: PAGAZAURTUNDÚA Maite date: 2018-02-26T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/4
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
rapporteur
name: PAGAZAURTUNDÚA Maite date: 2018-02-26T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: LÓPEZ AGUILAR Juan Fernando date: 2019-10-14T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: LÓPEZ AGUILAR Juan Fernando date: 2019-10-14T00:00:00 group: S&D - Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
associated
False
rapporteur
name: REGNER Evelyn date: 2020-04-27T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
associated
False
rapporteur
name: REGNER Evelyn date: 2020-04-27T00:00:00 group: S&D - Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/4
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
rapporteur
name: PAGAZAURTUNDÚA Maite date: 2018-02-26T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
committees/4
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
rapporteur
name: PAGAZAURTUNDÚA Maite date: 2018-02-26T00:00:00 group: ALDE - Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: LÓPEZ AGUILAR Juan Fernando date: 2019-10-14T00:00:00 group: S&D - Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: LÓPEZ AGUILAR Juan Fernando date: 2019-10-14T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
shadows
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
associated
False
rapporteur
name: REGNER Evelyn date: 2020-04-27T00:00:00 group: S&D - Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
associated
False
rapporteur
name: REGNER Evelyn date: 2020-04-27T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
committees/4
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
rapporteur
name: PAGAZAURTUNDÚA Maite date: 2018-02-26T00:00:00 group: ALDE - Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/4
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
rapporteur
name: PAGAZAURTUNDÚA Maite date: 2018-02-26T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: LÓPEZ AGUILAR Juan Fernando date: 2019-10-14T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: LÓPEZ AGUILAR Juan Fernando date: 2019-10-14T00:00:00 group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
associated
False
rapporteur
name: REGNER Evelyn date: 2020-04-27T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
associated
False
rapporteur
name: REGNER Evelyn date: 2020-04-27T00:00:00 group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/4
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
rapporteur
name: PAGAZAURTUNDÚA Maite date: 2018-02-26T00:00:00 group: ??? abbr: Unknown Group
committees/4
type
Former Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
associated
False
rapporteur
name: PAGAZAURTUNDÚA Maite date: 2018-02-26T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: LÓPEZ AGUILAR Juan Fernando date: 2019-10-14T00:00:00 group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: LÓPEZ AGUILAR Juan Fernando date: 2019-10-14T00:00:00 group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/3/rapporteur/0/mepref
96998
committees/4/rapporteur/0/mepref
125038
procedure/subtype
Old
  • Consent by Parliament
  • See also 2017/0360R(NLE)
New
Consent by Parliament
procedure/subtype
Old
Consent by Parliament
New
  • Consent by Parliament
  • See also 2017/0360R(NLE)
committees/3/rapporteur
  • name: REGNER Evelyn date: 2020-04-27T00:00:00 group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
associated
False
events/0/body
EP
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: LÓPEZ AGUILAR Juan Fernando date: 2019-10-14T00:00:00 group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
associated
False
rapporteur
name: LÓPEZ AGUILAR Juan Fernando date: 2019-10-14T00:00:00 group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0/shadows
  • name: METSOLA Roberta group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
  • name: ŠIMEČKA Michal group: Renew Europe group abbr: Renew
  • name: REINTKE Terry group: Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
  • name: BAY Nicolas group: Identity and Democracy abbr: ID
  • name: BRUDZIŃSKI Joachim Stanisław group: European Conservatives and Reformists Group abbr: ECR
  • name: ARVANITIS Konstantinos group: Confederal Group of the European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
events/0
date
2017-12-20T00:00:00
type
Preparatory document
docs
summary
committees/0/rapporteur
  • name: LÓPEZ AGUILAR Juan Fernando date: 2019-10-14T00:00:00 group: Group of Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
events/0
date
2017-12-20T00:00:00
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
committees/0/date
    committees/1/date
      committees/2/date
        committees/3
        type
        Former Committee Opinion
        body
        EP
        committee_full
        Constitutional Affairs
        committee
        AFCO
        associated
        False
        rapporteur
        name: PAGAZAURTUNDÚA Maite date: 2018-02-26T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
        committees/3
        type
        Former Committee Opinion
        body
        EP
        committee_full
        Constitutional Affairs
        committee
        AFCO
        associated
        False
        date
        2018-02-26T00:00:00
        rapporteur
        name: PAGAZAURTUNDÚA Maite group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
        activities
        • date: 2017-12-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2017/0835/COM_COM(2017)0835_EN.pdf title: COM(2017)0835 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52017PC0835:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/justice-and-consumers_en title: Justice and Consumers Commissioner: TIMMERMANS Frans type: Legislative proposal published
        • body: CSL meeting_id: 3614 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3614*&MEET_DATE=17/04/2018 type: Debate in Council title: 3614 council: General Affairs date: 2018-04-17T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
        commission
        • body: EC dg: Justice and Consumers commissioner: TIMMERMANS Frans
        committees/0
        type
        Responsible Committee
        body
        EP
        committee_full
        Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
        committee
        LIBE
        associated
        False
        date
        committees/0
        body
        EP
        responsible
        False
        committee
        AFCO
        date
        2018-02-26T00:00:00
        committee_full
        Constitutional Affairs
        rapporteur
        group: ALDE name: PAGAZAURTUNDÚA RUIZ Maite
        committees/1
        type
        Former Responsible Committee
        body
        EP
        committee_full
        Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
        committee
        LIBE
        associated
        False
        date
        committees/1
        body
        EP
        responsible
        True
        committee_full
        Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
        committee
        LIBE
        committees/2
        type
        Committee Opinion
        body
        EP
        committee_full
        Constitutional Affairs
        committee
        AFCO
        associated
        False
        date
        committees/3
        type
        Former Committee Opinion
        body
        EP
        committee_full
        Constitutional Affairs
        committee
        AFCO
        associated
        False
        date
        2018-02-26T00:00:00
        rapporteur
        name: PAGAZAURTUNDÚA Maite group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
        council
        • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 3663 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3663*&MEET_DATE=11/12/2018 date: 2018-12-11T00:00:00
        • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 3614 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3614*&MEET_DATE=17/04/2018 date: 2018-04-17T00:00:00
        docs
        • date: 2019-01-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2017)0835 title: COM(2017)0835 type: Contribution body: FR_ASSEMBLY
        events
        • date: 2017-12-20T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2017/0835/COM_COM(2017)0835_EN.pdf title: COM(2017)0835 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2017&nu_doc=0835 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to determine a clear risk of a serious breach of the rule of law by Poland. PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision. ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act. BACKGROUND: the European Union is founded on a common set of values enshrined in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), which include the respect for the rule of law. According to Article 7(1) TEU , on a reasoned proposal by one third of the Member States, by the European Parliament or by the European Commission, the Council, acting by a majority of four fifths of its members after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament, may determine that there is a clear risk of a serious breach by a Member State of the values referred to in Article 2. In this reasoned proposal , the Commission presents its concerns regarding the lack of an independent and legitimate constitutional review and to the adoption in 2017 by the Polish Parliament of the law on the Supreme Court, the law on Ordinary Courts Organisation, the law on the National Council for the Judiciary and the law on the National School of Judiciary which contain provisions raising serious concerns as regards judicial independence, the separation of powers and legal certainty . In particular, the main concerns relate to the new retirement regimes of Supreme Court judges and ordinary court judges, a new extraordinary appeal procedure in the Supreme Court, the dismissal and appointment of presidents of ordinary courts and the termination of the mandate and the appointment procedure of judges-members of the National Council for the Judiciary. The Commission has carried out an extensive dialogue with the Polish authorities since January 2016 in order to find solutions to the concerns raised. On 20 December 2017, it adopted a further r ecommendation regarding the rule of law in Poland supplementing three previous recommendations adopted on 27 July 2016, 21 December 2016 and 27 July 2017. However, Poland failed to take the appropriate measures within the time set in this recommendation. On 15 November 2017, the European Parliament adopted a resolution stating that the current situation in Poland represents a clear risk of a serious breach of EU values. CONTENT: in accordance with Article 7(1) TEU, the Commission submits the present reasoned proposal to the Council inviting it to determine that there is a clear risk of a serious breach by Poland of the rule of law. It recommended that Poland take the following actions within three months after notification of this Decision: restore the independence and legitimacy of the Constitutional Tribunal as guarantor of the Polish Constitution by ensuring that its judges, its President and its Vice-President are lawfully elected and appointed; ensure that the law on the Supreme Court, the law on Ordinary Courts Organisation, the law on the National Council for the Judiciary and the law on the National School of Judiciary are amended in order to ensure their compliance with the requirements relating to the independence of the judiciary, the separation of powers and legal certainty; ensure that any justice reform is prepared in close cooperation with the judiciary and all interested parties, including the European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission); refrain from actions and public statements which could undermine further the legitimacy of the Constitutional Tribunal, the Supreme Court, the ordinary courts, the judges, individually or collectively, or the judiciary as a whole.
        • date: 2018-04-17T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3614*&MEET_DATE=17/04/2018 title: 3614
        • date: 2018-12-11T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3663*&MEET_DATE=11/12/2018 title: 3663
        links
        other
        • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/justice-and-consumers_en title: Justice and Consumers commissioner: TIMMERMANS Frans
        procedure/subject
        Old
        • 8.30.10 Principles common to the Member States, EU values
        New
        8.30.10
        Principles common to the Member States, EU values
        activities/0/docs/0/text
        • PURPOSE: to determine a clear risk of a serious breach of the rule of law by Poland.

          PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.

          ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act.

          BACKGROUND: the European Union is founded on a common set of values enshrined in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), which include the respect for the rule of law.

          According to Article 7(1) TEU, on a reasoned proposal by one third of the Member States, by the European Parliament or by the European Commission, the Council, acting by a majority of four fifths of its members after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament, may determine that there is a clear risk of a serious breach by a Member State of the values referred to in Article 2.

          In this reasoned proposal, the Commission presents its concerns regarding the lack of an independent and legitimate constitutional review and to the adoption in 2017 by the Polish Parliament of the law on the Supreme Court, the law on Ordinary Courts Organisation, the law on the National Council for the Judiciary and the law on the National School of Judiciary which contain provisions raising serious concerns as regards judicial independence, the separation of powers and legal certainty.

          In particular, the main concerns relate to the new retirement regimes of Supreme Court judges and ordinary court judges, a new extraordinary appeal procedure in the Supreme Court, the dismissal and appointment of presidents of ordinary courts and the termination of the mandate and the appointment procedure of judges-members of the National Council for the Judiciary. 

          The Commission has carried out an extensive dialogue with the Polish authorities since January 2016 in order to find solutions to the concerns raised. On 20 December 2017, it adopted a further recommendation regarding the rule of law in Poland supplementing three previous recommendations adopted on 27 July 2016, 21 December 2016 and 27 July 2017. However, Poland failed to take the appropriate measures within the time set in this recommendation.

          On 15 November 2017, the European Parliament adopted a resolution stating that the current situation in Poland represents a clear risk of a serious breach of EU values.

          CONTENT: in accordance with Article 7(1) TEU, the Commission submits the present reasoned proposal to the Council inviting it to determine that there is a clear risk of a serious breach by Poland of the rule of law.

          It recommended that Poland take the following actions within three months after notification of this Decision:

          • restore the independence and legitimacy of the Constitutional Tribunal as guarantor of the Polish Constitution by ensuring that its judges, its President and its Vice-President are lawfully elected and appointed;
          • ensure that the law on the Supreme Court, the law on Ordinary Courts Organisation, the law on the National Council for the Judiciary and the law on the National School of Judiciary are amended in order to ensure their compliance with the requirements relating to the independence of the judiciary, the separation of powers and legal certainty; 
          • ensure that any justice reform is prepared in close cooperation with the judiciary and all interested parties, including the European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission);
          • refrain from actions and public statements which could undermine further the legitimacy of the Constitutional Tribunal, the Supreme Court, the ordinary courts, the judges, individually or collectively, or the judiciary as a whole.
        activities/1
        body
        CSL
        meeting_id
        3614
        docs
        url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3614*&MEET_DATE=17/04/2018 type: Debate in Council title: 3614
        council
        General Affairs
        date
        2018-04-17T00:00:00
        type
        Council Meeting
        committees/0/date
        2018-02-26T00:00:00
        committees/0/rapporteur
        • group: ALDE name: PAGAZAURTUNDÚA RUIZ Maite
        procedure/legal_basis/0
        Old
        Treaty on European Union TEU 007-p1
        New
        Treaty on European Union TEU 07-p1
        procedure/subject/0
        Old
        7.40 Judicial cooperation
        New
        8.30.10 Principles common to the Member States, EU values
        procedure/subject/0
        1.20 Citizen's rights
        procedure/subject/2
        8.50 EU law
        activities/0/commission/0
        DG
        Commissioner
        TIMMERMANS Frans
        other/0
        body
        EC
        dg
        commissioner
        TIMMERMANS Frans
        activities
        • date: 2017-12-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2017/0835/COM_COM(2017)0835_EN.pdf title: COM(2017)0835 type: Legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52017PC0835:EN body: EC type: Legislative proposal published commission:
        committees
        • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO
        • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
        links
        other
          procedure
          legal_basis
          Treaty on European Union TEU 007-p1
          reference
          2017/0360(NLE)
          title
          Determination of a clear risk of a serious breach by Poland of the rule of law
          geographical_area
          Poland
          stage_reached
          Preparatory phase in Parliament
          subtype
          Consent by Parliament
          type
          NLE - Non-legislative enactments
          subject