BETA


2017/2052(INI) Next MFF: preparing the Parliament’s position on the MFF post-2020

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead BUDG OLBRYCHT Jan (icon: PPE PPE), THOMAS Isabelle (icon: S&D S&D) KÖLMEL Bernd (icon: ECR ECR), DEPREZ Gérard (icon: ALDE ALDE), SOLÉ Jordi (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), ZANNI Marco (icon: ENF ENF)
Committee Opinion AFET PANZERI Pier Antonio (icon: S&D S&D) Sabine LÖSING (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), Cristian Dan PREDA (icon: PPE PPE), Anders Primdahl VISTISEN (icon: ECR ECR)
Committee Opinion DEVE RÜBIG Paul (icon: PPE PPE) Nirj DEVA (icon: ECR ECR), Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), Jean-Luc SCHAFFHAUSER (icon: ENF ENF), Elly SCHLEIN (icon: S&D S&D)
Committee Opinion INTA
Committee Opinion CONT SARVAMAA Petri (icon: PPE PPE) Nedzhmi ALI (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion EMPL ULVSKOG Marita (icon: S&D S&D)
Committee Opinion ENVI JÄÄTTEENMÄKI Anneli (icon: ALDE ALDE) Nicola CAPUTO (icon: S&D S&D)
Committee Opinion ITRE MARINESCU Marian-Jean (icon: PPE PPE) Sofia SAKORAFA (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), Claude TURMES (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), Anneleen VAN BOSSUYT (icon: ECR ECR)
Committee Opinion TRAN MARINESCU Marian-Jean (icon: PPE PPE) Nicola CAPUTO (icon: S&D S&D), Pavel TELIČKA (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion REGI VAUGHAN Derek (icon: S&D S&D)
Committee Opinion AGRI RIBEIRO Sofia (icon: PPE PPE) Giulia MOI (icon: EFDD EFDD), Hannu TAKKULA (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion PECH AGUILERA Clara (icon: S&D S&D) Werner KUHN (icon: PPE PPE), Norica NICOLAI (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion CULT TRÜPEL Helga (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE) Luigi MORGANO (icon: S&D S&D), Liadh NÍ RIADA (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI (icon: PPE PPE)
Committee Opinion LIBE MACOVEI Monica (icon: ECR ECR) Gérard DEPREZ (icon: ALDE ALDE), Bodil VALERO (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Committee Opinion AFCO ANNEMANS Gerolf (icon: ENF ENF) Mercedes BRESSO (icon: S&D S&D), Morten MESSERSCHMIDT (icon: ECR ECR)
Committee Opinion FEMM GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe (icon: S&D S&D) Arne GERICKE (icon: ECR ECR), Barbara MATERA (icon: PPE PPE), Angelika MLINAR (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2018/08/30
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2018/03/14
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2018/03/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 458 votes to 177, with 62 abstentions, a resolution on the next multiannual financial framework (MFF): Preparing Parliament's position on the MFF post-2020.

This resolution outlined the Parliament’s position on the post-2020 MFF and the specific budgetary orientations for the respective EU policies covered by the next financial framework. It called on the Commission to present the legislative proposal for the next MFF together with a new draft interinstitutional agreement that takes into account Parliament’s positions and suggestions.

In parallel, it adopted a separate resolution to set out its position on the reform of the EU’s own-resources system. It stressed that both the expenditure and the revenue side of the next MFF will be treated as a single package in the upcoming negotiations, and that no agreement will be reached on the MFF without corresponding headway being made on own resources.

Priorities and challenges of the next MFF : Members felt that that the next MFF should be embedded in a broader strategy for the future of Europe and should build on the Union’s well-established policies and priorities and address challenges such as youth unemployment, persistent poverty and social exclusion, the phenomenon of migration and refugees, climate change and natural disasters, environmental degradation, terrorism and instability.

Parliament called for continued support for the Union's existing policies, in particular the long-standing EU policies enshrined in the Treaties, namely the common agricultural and fisheries policies, and cohesion policy, whilst rejecting any attempt to renationalise these policies.

Europe should offer prospects to the younger generation and is determined to substantially scale up two of its flagship programmes, namely the Research Framework Programme and Erasmus+, which cannot satisfy the very high demand involving top quality applications with their current means.

Members stand firm in their support for a substantial increase in resources for the fight against youth unemployment and in support for small and medium-sized enterprises through the successor programmes of the Youth Employment Initiative and the programme for the Competitiveness of Enterprises and Small and medium-sized enterprises (COSME); also supports reinforcing the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) 2.0. They also called on the EU to assume its role in three emerging policy areas with internal and external dimensions, namely asylum, migration and integration policy, protection of external borders and common internal security and defence.

It called in the light of the above mentioned challenges and priorities, and taking into account the UK’s withdrawal from the Union, for a significant increase in the Union’s budget. Members estimate the required MFF expenditure ceilings at 1.3 % of the GNI of the EU-27, notwithstanding the range of instruments to be counted over and above the ceilings.

They are convinced that, unless the Council agrees to significantly increase the level of its national contributions to the EU budget, the introduction of new genuine EU own resources remains the only option for adequately financing the next MFF. Members stated that in this respect no agreement will be reached on the MFF.

Alignment of the duration of the MFF : Parliament stated that the decision on the duration of the MFF should strike the right balance between two conflicting requirements, namely, on the one hand, the need for several EU policies – especially those under shared management, such as agriculture and cohesion – to operate on the basis of the stability and predictability that is ensured through a commitment of at least seven years, and, on the other hand, the need for democratic legitimacy and accountability that results from the synchronisation of each financial framework with the five-year political cycle of the European Parliament and the Commission.

It underlined the need for the MFF’s duration to move progressively towards a 5+5 period with a mandatory mid-term revision . However, due to the timing of the next European Parliament elections in spring 2019 the 5+5 period may not apply, therefore it is proposed that the next MFF should be set for a period of seven years (2021-2027), including a mandatory mid-term revision, by way of a transitional solution to be applied for one last time.

Flexibility : Members recalled that, during the current MFF, the budgetary authority approved a substantial mobilisation of the flexibility mechanisms and special instruments included in the MFF Regulation, in order to secure the additional appropriations needed to respond to serious crises or finance new political priorities.

Although these provisions have worked well, in particular to face the challenges of migration and to bridge the investment deficit, a further reinforcement of these provisions is still necessary in order to better cope with new challenges, unforeseen events and the evolving political priorities that arise during the implementation of a long-term plan, such as the MFF.

Parliament reiterated its long-standing position that the European Development Fund , alongside other instruments outside the MFF, should be integrated into the Union budget in order to increase its legitimacy as well as the efficiency and effectiveness of the Union’s development policy.

Level of payments : Members called for the future payment ceilings to be set at an appropriate level, leaving only a limited and realistic gap between commitments and payments . They warned against a repetition of such a payment crisis in the transition to the next MFF, as this would have serious consequences for beneficiaries such as students, universities, SMEs and researchers.

Procedure and decision-making process : Members called for a decision-making procedure on the next MFF that safeguards Parliament’s role and prerogatives as set out in the Treaties. They insisted that the MFF Regulation is not the appropriate place for changes to the EU Financial Regulation and urged the Commission to put forward a separate proposal for a revision of the EU Financial Regulation if need be. They also stressed that a shift towards qualified majority voting for the adoption of the MFF Regulation would be in line with the decision-making process for the adoption of virtually all EU multiannual programmes, as well as for the annual procedure for adopting the EU budget.

Lastly, the Commission is called on to propose a mechanism whereby Member States that do not respect the values enshrined in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) can be subject to financial consequences but not through the European Union budget, so that beneficiaries such as regions, organisations or citizens are not harmed financially.

Documents
2018/03/14
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2018/03/13
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2018/02/28
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/02/28
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Budgets adopted an own-initiative report by Jan OLBRYCHT (EPP, PL) and Isabelle THOMAS (S&D, FR) on the next MFF: Preparing the Parliament’s position on the MFF post-2020.

The report noted that the multi-annual financial framework (MFF) 2014-2020 quickly proved its inadequacy in meeting actual needs and political ambitions, as, from the outset, it was called upon to address a series of crises and new challenges in the areas of investment, migration and refugees, youth employment, security, the environment and climate change, which had not been anticipated at the time of its adoption.

As a result, the current MFF had already been pushed to its limits after only two years of implementation as available margins had been exhausted, flexibility provisions and special instruments had been mobilised to a substantial extent, existing policies and programmes had been put under pressure or even reduced, and some off-budget mechanisms had been created as a way of compensating for the insufficient level and flexibility of the EU budget.

The Commission will present its package of proposals on the post-2020 MFF, including future own resources, in May 2018.

Members adopted the present report in order to outline Parliament’s position on the post-2020 MFF . They expect the Commission to present the legislative proposal for the next MFF together with a new draft interinstitutional agreement that takes into account Parliament’s positions and suggestions. They aim to adopt, in parallel, a separate report to set out its position on the reform of the EU’s own-resources system in line with the recommendations of the High Level Group on Own Resources.

Members called on the Commission to take due account of Parliament’s position in preparing the legislative proposals on the EU’s own resources, which should be ambitious in scope and presented together with the MFF proposals.

Priorities and challenges of the next MFF : Members stressed that the next MFF should be embedded in a broader strategy and narrative for the future of Europe and should enable the Union to provide solutions and emerge strengthened from the crises of the decade. Europe should offer prospects to the younger generation and is determined to substantially scale up two of its flagship programmes, namely the Research Framework Programme and Erasmus+, which cannot satisfy the very high demand involving top quality applications with their current means. Members stand firm in their support for a substantial increase in resources for the fight against youth unemployment and in support for small and medium-sized enterprises through the successor programmes of the Youth Employment Initiative and the programme for the Competitiveness of Enterprises and Small and medium-sized enterprises (COSME); also supports reinforcing the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) 2.0. They also called on the EU to assume its role in three emerging policy areas with internal and external dimensions .

The report stated that a stronger and a more ambitious Europe can only be achieved if it is provided with reinforced financial means . It called in the light of the above mentioned challenges and priorities, and taking into account the UK’s withdrawal from the Union, for a significant increase in the Union’s budget . Members estimate the required MFF expenditure ceilings at 1.3 % of the GNI of the EU-27, notwithstanding the range of instruments to be counted over and above the ceilings.

They are convinced that, unless the Council agrees to significantly increase the level of its national contributions to the EU budget, the introduction of new genuine EU own resources remains the only option for adequately financing the next MFF. Members stated that in this respect no agreement will be reached on the MFF without corresponding headway being made on own resources.

Alignment of the duration of the MFF : Members stated that the decision on the duration of the MFF should strike the right balance between two conflicting requirements, namely, on the one hand, the need for several EU policies – especially those under shared management, such as agriculture and cohesion – to operate on the basis of the stability and predictability that is ensured through a commitment of at least seven years, and, on the other hand, the need for democratic legitimacy and accountability that results from the synchronisation of each financial framework with the five-year political cycle of the European Parliament and the Commission.

They underlined the need for the MFF’s duration to move progressively towards a 5+5 period with a mandatory mid-term revision . However, due to the timing of the next European Parliament elections in spring 2019 the 5+5 period may not apply, therefore it is proposed that the next MFF should be set for a period of seven years (2021-2027), including a mandatory mid-term revision, by way of a transitional solution to be applied for one last time.

Flexibility : the report underlined that, during the current MFF, the budgetary authority approved a substantial mobilisation of the flexibility mechanisms and special instruments included in the MFF Regulation, in order to secure the additional appropriations needed to respond to serious crises or finance new political priorities. These provisions have worked well but a further reinforcement of these provisions is still necessary in order to better cope with new challenges, unforeseen events and the evolving political priorities that arise during the implementation of a long-term plan, such as the MFF.

Members reiterated their long-standing position that the European Development Fund , alongside other instruments outside the MFF, should be integrated into the Union budget in order to increase its legitimacy as well as the efficiency and effectiveness of the Union’s development policy.

Procedure and decision-making process : Members called for a decision-making procedure on the next MFF that safeguards Parliament’s role and prerogatives as set out in the Treaties. They insisted that the MFF Regulation is not the appropriate place for changes to the EU Financial Regulation and urged the Commission to put forward a separate proposal for a revision of the EU Financial Regulation if need be. They also stressed that a shift towards qualified majority voting for the adoption of the MFF Regulation would be in line with the decision-making process for the adoption of virtually all EU multiannual programmes, as well as for the annual procedure for adopting the EU budget.

Lastly, the Commission is called on to propose a mechanism whereby Member States that do not respect the values enshrined in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) can be subject to financial consequences but not through the European Union budget, so that beneficiaries such as regions, organisations or citizens are not harmed financially.

Documents
2018/02/22
   EP - Vote in committee
2018/02/01
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/02/01
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/02/01
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/01/31
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/01/26
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/01/26
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/01/25
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/01/15
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/01/10
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2017/12/07
   EP - ULVSKOG Marita (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in EMPL
2017/12/06
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2017/12/06
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2017/12/01
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2017/11/30
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2017/11/23
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2017/11/23
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2017/10/12
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2017/10/11
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2017/07/03
   EP - RÜBIG Paul (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE
2017/06/29
   EP - MACOVEI Monica (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2017/05/19
   EP - MARINESCU Marian-Jean (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE
2017/05/18
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2017/05/17
   EP - PANZERI Pier Antonio (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in AFET
2017/04/25
   EP - OLBRYCHT Jan (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2017/04/25
   EP - THOMAS Isabelle (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2017/04/25
   EP - MARINESCU Marian-Jean (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in TRAN
2017/04/18
   EP - SARVAMAA Petri (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2017/04/06
   EP - JÄÄTTEENMÄKI Anneli (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2017/04/05
   EP - RIBEIRO Sofia (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in AGRI
2017/04/04
   EP - GARCÍA PÉREZ Iratxe (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM
2017/03/28
   EP - TRÜPEL Helga (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in CULT
2017/03/22
   EP - AGUILERA Clara (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in PECH
2017/03/21
   EP - VAUGHAN Derek (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in REGI
2017/03/20
   EP - ANNEMANS Gerolf (ENF) appointed as rapporteur in AFCO

Documents

  • Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)366
  • Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
  • Decision by Parliament: T8-0075/2018
  • Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
  • Committee opinion: PE618.338
  • Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0048/2018
  • Amendments tabled in committee: PE616.895
  • Amendments tabled in committee: PE616.896
  • Amendments tabled in committee: PE616.897
  • Committee opinion: PE612.385
  • Committee opinion: PE612.219
  • Committee opinion: PE612.377
  • Committee opinion: PE610.546
  • Committee opinion: PE609.632
  • Committee draft report: PE615.478
  • Committee opinion: PE610.693
  • Committee opinion: PE610.884
  • Committee opinion: PE610.555
  • Committee opinion: PE612.221
  • Committee opinion: PE606.021
  • Committee opinion: PE610.677
  • Committee opinion: PE606.254
  • Committee opinion: PE606.230
  • Committee opinion: PE606.230
  • Committee opinion: PE606.254
  • Committee opinion: PE606.021
  • Committee opinion: PE610.677
  • Committee opinion: PE612.221
  • Committee opinion: PE610.555
  • Committee opinion: PE610.693
  • Committee opinion: PE610.884
  • Committee draft report: PE615.478
  • Committee opinion: PE609.632
  • Committee opinion: PE610.546
  • Committee opinion: PE612.219
  • Committee opinion: PE612.377
  • Committee opinion: PE612.385
  • Amendments tabled in committee: PE616.895
  • Amendments tabled in committee: PE616.896
  • Amendments tabled in committee: PE616.897
  • Committee opinion: PE618.338
  • Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)366

Votes

A8-0048/2018 - Jan Olbrycht et Isabelle Thomas - Am 144S 14/03/2018 12:38:47.000 #

2018/03/14 Outcome: -: 536, +: 156, 0: 13
GB DK NL FI IE MT EE CY LU BE LV SK SI LT HR SE AT EL PL BG CZ PT HU FR RO ES IT DE
Total
69
12
25
13
9
6
6
6
6
21
7
10
8
11
11
17
17
20
47
17
21
20
20
69
32
47
64
92
icon: ECR ECR
62

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

2
icon: ENF ENF
33

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Poland ENF

1

Germany ENF

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
43

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
17

United Kingdom NI

2

Denmark NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
3

Romania NI

1

Germany NI

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
50

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3
4
icon: S&D S&D
179

Denmark S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Czechia S&D

4
icon: PPE PPE
208

United Kingdom PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

A8-0048/2018 - Jan Olbrycht et Isabelle Thomas - Am 67 14/03/2018 12:39:11.000 #

2018/03/14 Outcome: -: 587, +: 60, 0: 53
EL CY EE IE LU LV MT SI LT HR DK SK PT HU FI PL AT SE BG CZ BE NL ES RO IT FR GB DE
Total
19
6
6
9
6
7
6
8
11
11
12
10
20
20
13
47
17
17
17
21
20
25
48
32
63
69
68
90
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (2)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
17

Denmark NI

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

3

Poland NI

1

Romania NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2

Germany NI

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: ECR ECR
61

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

2
icon: ENF ENF
33

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
43

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
4
icon: S&D S&D
177

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2
3

Hungary S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Finland S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia S&D

4

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
208

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0048/2018 - Jan Olbrycht et Isabelle Thomas - Am 23/1 14/03/2018 12:40:20.000 #

2018/03/14 Outcome: -: 441, +: 237, 0: 24
SE FR EE NL BE IE FI DK EL MT LT LU CY LV SI HR AT GB ES BG CZ PT HU SK IT RO DE PL
Total
17
68
6
25
20
9
13
12
20
6
11
6
6
7
8
11
17
69
48
17
21
20
20
10
64
32
90
47
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Czechia ALDE

4

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
50

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
43

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
33

Netherlands ENF

4

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
17

France NI

Against (1)

3

Denmark NI

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Romania NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
62

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
178

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

Against (1)

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Lithuania S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Czechia S&D

4
3
icon: PPE PPE
207

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0048/2018 - Jan Olbrycht et Isabelle Thomas - Am 23/2 14/03/2018 12:40:33.000 #

2018/03/14 Outcome: -: 527, +: 149, 0: 19
IE CY MT LV SE EE SI EL LU HR DK FI AT GB LT PT SK NL CZ BG HU BE ES IT RO DE PL FR
Total
9
6
6
7
17
5
8
20
6
11
12
13
17
69
11
19
9
25
21
15
20
21
46
63
31
90
47
69
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
50

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
43

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
17

Denmark NI

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
3

Romania NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
33

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Finland ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Romania ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Germany ALDE

Abstain (1)

4
icon: ECR ECR
61

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
176

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

Against (1)

3

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2
3

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

4
icon: PPE PPE
204

Ireland PPE

For (1)

4

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0048/2018 - Jan Olbrycht et Isabelle Thomas - Am 74 14/03/2018 12:40:46.000 #

2018/03/14 Outcome: -: 476, +: 186, 0: 37
IE EL DK GB CY MT LU AT SE EE FI LV HU SI HR LT BE SK PT CZ NL BG ES IT RO DE PL FR
Total
9
20
12
68
6
6
6
17
17
6
13
7
20
8
11
11
21
10
20
21
25
17
47
64
31
90
47
68
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
50

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2
icon: ECR ECR
61

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

2

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
43

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
17

Denmark NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Romania NI

1

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

3
icon: ENF ENF
33

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3
4
icon: S&D S&D
177

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Greece S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Denmark S&D

Against (1)

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1
4

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2
3

Czechia S&D

4

Netherlands S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

4
icon: PPE PPE
207

Ireland PPE

Against (1)

4

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

3