Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | TRAN | ERTUG Ismail ( S&D) | BACH Georges ( PPE), DEMESMAEKER Mark ( ECR), RIQUET Dominique ( ALDE), CRAMER Michael ( Verts/ALE), PAKSAS Rolandas ( EFDD) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 47
Legal Basis:
RoP 47Events
The European Parliament adopted by 577 votes to 32, with 19 abstentions, a resolution containing with recommendations to the Commission on odometer manipulation in motor vehicles: revision of the EU legal framework.
Members recalled that odometer tampering, i.e. the malpractice of deliberate and unauthorised altering of the real mileage of a vehicle shown on its odometer, is a serious and widespread problem throughout the whole European Union especially in cross-border trade and harms third countries, which import second-hand cars from the European Union.
Studies estimate the share of tampered vehicles between 5 % and 12 % of used cars in national sales and between 30 % and 50 % in cross-border sales, accumulating to a total economic damage between EUR 5.6 and 9.6 billion in the whole Union.
Tackling odometer fraud by swiftly establishing uniform rules to prevent manipulation will fundamentally enhance security and certainty in the cross-border purchases of vehicles hence reducing the scale of unfair practices and also bringing substantial benefits to millions of Europeans consumers.
Odometer manipulation is prohibited in 26 Member States, only ten of them have additional measures to verify the mileage available to customers and only six recognise odometer manipulation as criminal offence.
In this context, Parliament asked the Commission to submit, on the basis of Article 91(1) and Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), a legislative framework that requires Member States to create legal, technical and operational barriers in order to make odometer manipulations impossible within a timeframe of twelve months after the adoption by Parliament of this resolution.
Parliament recommended that the proposal be structured around the following aspects:
Fostering technical solutions and type approval : in order to make the manipulation of odometer readings more difficult, a higher level of invehicle security for odometer data should be established. This is to be achieved by including the following in the proposal:
monitoring of the implementation of point (f) of Article 5 (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 and submit a report with the results to Parliament as soon as possible; establishing clear requirements for securing odometer readings against manipulation ; introducing a test method or apply the Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation for the preventive solutions provided for in Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 regarding odometer fraud.
Database systems : an EU-wide solution is essential as isolated national initiatives are not able to prevent odometer fraud in cross-border trading of second-hand vehicles. Therefore, the proposed act should contain the following measures:
the mandatory odometer reading recordings provided for in Directive 2014/45/EU should be made available for cross-border exchange and on request also to customers; create a legal framework for setting up comparable mileage recording databases in the Member States, ensuring international exchange and access to information, based on existing best practice that provides frequent and reliable mileage data recording; existing odometer reading databases on Member States’ level should be interconnected, compatible and interoperable on EU-level and allow for international data exchange while existing infrastructure like Eucaris should be used for a cost-effective and timely implementation; data protection rules should be respected; buyers of second-hand vehicles should be provided with a means to verify, before the purchase, the accuracy of the odometer reading of the car, based on the collected mileage data from that vehicle regardless of the Member State in which it was previously registered.
Block chain operation : blockchain technology can ultimately provide a reliable tool by which to secure data in a network and to help prevent manipulation of data entries. Parliament proposes:
to assess the potential costs and benefits of establishing a European blockchain network for odometer readings and to create the necessary legal and regulatory framework in case of a positive assessment;
to make it compulsory to record mileage readings during the periodical technical inspection (PTI) and makes these recordings available for the subsequent PTIs, but only addresses mileage recordings during roadworthiness tests from the first roadworthiness inspection onwards.
Lastly, the measures should provide that odometer fraud should be regarded as an offence committed both by the person who orders the meter reading to be changed (the car owner) and by the person who changes the meter reading, and should be punishable by effective, proportionate, dissuasive and non-discriminatory penalties that follow a highly comparable standard in the whole Union.
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the own-initiative report by Ismail ERTUG (S&D, DE) with recommendations to the Commission on odometer manipulation in motor vehicles: revision of the EU legal framework.
As a reminder, odometer tampering, i.e. the malpractice of deliberate and unauthorised altering of the real mileage of a vehicle shown on its odometer, is a serious and widespread problem throughout the whole European Union especially in cross-border trade and harms third countries, which import second-hand cars from the European Union.
Studies estimate the share of tampered vehicles between 5 % and 12 % of used cars in national sales and between 30 % and 50 % in cross-border sales, accumulating to a total economic damage between EUR 5.6 and 9.6 billion in the whole Union.
In the absence of a common, integrated system for exchange of information between Member States, there is an increased risk of legalising a mileage reading already manipulated before its initial verification in the country in which the car will ultimately be registered and where there are already measures to register the vehicle and verify its mileage.
Tackling odometer fraud by swiftly establishing uniform rules to prevent manipulation will fundamentally enhance security and certainty in the cross-border purchases of vehicles hence reducing the scale of unfair practices and also bringing substantial benefits to millions of Europeans consumers.
Odometer manipulation is prohibited in 26 Member States, only ten of them have additional measures to verify the mileage available to customers and only six recognise odometer manipulation as criminal offense. The hardware and software used for tampering with odometers are freely available in the Union and that is not classified as a criminal offence and whereas more Member States are on the way to criminalising activities connected with the illegal manipulation of meter readings.
Against this background, Members requested the Commission to:
submit a legislative framework that requires Member States to create legal, technical and operational barriers in order to make odometer manipulations impossible, following the recommendations set out in this report and the Annex hereto within a timeframe of twelve months after the adoption of this report by the European Parliament; ensure that the same legal and technical barriers are also applied to imports from non-EU countries; strengthen type approval for in-car security, especially for the technical measures against odometer fraud but also in light of the increase of connected cars; establish clear criteria for effectively checking the safety of odometers, to adjust those requirements if necessary, within the shortest timeframe possible and to report to the Parliament about the effectiveness of the regulation; propose a legislative framework for Member States to set up comparable and mutually compatible national data collection mechanisms , based on existing best practices, that will provide frequent and reliable mileage data collection, starting at the time of a vehicle’s first registration and allow for international exchange; proactively inform consumers and stakeholders about existing measures against odometer fraud and about ways to detect and prevent odometer manipulation; make participation in EUCARIS (the European Car and driving license Information System) mandatory and to implement it as a vehicle information platform thus facilitating mileage verification throughout the whole Union with a view to reducing the possibilities for odometer manipulation; provide for a legal framework enabling the Member States to register mandatory odometer readings from periodical technical inspections, from each inspection, service, maintenance operation and repair carried out, and from other garage visits, starting with the vehicle’s first registration; conduct a cost-benefit-analysis for a blockchain based solution within twelve months after the adoption of this report by the European Parliament, including security, transparency and protection of data; submit a proposal for an act on measures tackling odometer manipulation;
Member States are called on to:
create or amend legislation on odometer manipulation in order to make it a criminal offence – including the provision of hardware, software and the related services required for unauthorised manipulation – since tampering leads to incorrect assessment of vehicle roadworthiness and thus has a negative impact on road safety; provide sufficient human and financial resources for the effective, non-discriminatory and proportionate enforcement of this legislation.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)516
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0235/2018
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0155/2018
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE616.846
- Committee draft report: PE615.366
- Committee draft report: PE615.366
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE616.846
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)516
Activities
- Ioan Mircea PAŞCU
- Claudia ȚAPARDEL
- Daniela AIUTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nicola CAPUTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mark DEMESMAEKER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- André ELISSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Takis HADJIGEORGIOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jaromír KOHLÍČEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Notis MARIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rolandas PAKSAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Olga SEHNALOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jill SEYMOUR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Branislav ŠKRIPEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Monika SMOLKOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Adam SZEJNFELD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tibor SZANYI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Francis ZAMMIT DIMECH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Janusz ZEMKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0155/2018 - Ismail Ertug - Vote unique 31/05/2018 12:16:03.000 #
Amendments | Dossier |
129 |
2017/2064(INL)
2018/02/08
TRAN
129 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 a (new) – having regard to Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1a, _________________ 1aDirective 2014/47/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the technical roadside inspection of the roadworthiness of commercial vehicles circulating in the Union and repealing Directive 2000/30/EC, L 127, 29.4.2014, p. 134.
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the number of kilometres driven is one of the most important parameters for a buyer to assess the technical condition of a vehicle, and whereas the mileage reading has a significant impact on a vehicle’s market value;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 3 a (new) The Commission should propose a legal framework for the set-up of comparable mileage data collection in Member States based on existing best practice that provide for frequent and reliable mileage date collection;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 4 – indent 1 - the mandatory odometer reading recordings as called for in Directive 2014/45/EU should be made available for cross-border exchange
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 4 – indent 1 - the mandatory odometer reading recordings as called for in Directive 2014/45/EU should be made available to customers for cross-border exchange
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 4 – indent 1 - the mandatory odometer reading recordings as called for in Directive 2014/45/EU should be made available for cross-border exchange
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 4 – indent 1 - the mandatory odometer reading recordings as called for in Directive 2014/45/EU should be made available for cross-border exchange
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 4 – indent 1 a (new) - create a legal framework for setting up comparable mileage recording databases in the Member States, ensuring international exchange and access to information, based on existing best practice that provides frequent and reliable mileage data recording;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 4 – indent 2 - existing odometer reading databases on Member States’ level should be inte
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 4 – indent 2 - existing odometer reading databases on Member States’ level should be inte
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 4 – indent 2 -
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 4 – indent 2 - existing odometer reading databases on Member States’ level should be
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 4 – indent 3 - data protection rules should be respected and, where necessary, adapted in a way to enable storage and exchange of the relevant data and protection of privacy
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 4 – indent 3 - data protection rules should be respected and, where necessary, adapted in a way to enable storage and exchange of the relevant data and protection of privacy
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 4 – indent 3 a (new) - buyers of second-hand vehicles should be provided with a means to verify, before the purchase, the accuracy of the odometer reading of the car, based on the collected mileage data from that vehicle regardless of the Member State in which it was previously registered;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 4 – indent 3 a (new) – purchasers of second-hand vehicles must be given easy access to odometer data before concluding the sale contract.
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 4 a (new) Consumers should be able, before buying a second-hand vehicle, to verify the accuracy of the odometer reading of the vehicle, based on the collected mileage data from that vehicle regardless of the Member State in which it was previously registered;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 5 Blockchain and connectivity as potential and complementary long-term solutions
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 5 Blockchain and connectivity as possible long-term solutions
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 5 Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas odometer tampering harms consumers, second-hand car dealers, insurers and leasing companies, while those who commit this fraud derive advantages from it;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 7 The blockchain technology could in time offer
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 7 The blockchain technology could offer
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 7 The blockchain technology offers a
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 8 – indent 1 - assess the potential costs and benefits of establishing a European blockchain network for odometer readings;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 8 – indent 1 - consider the establishment of a European blockchain network for odometer readings;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 8 – indent 2 - create the legal and regulatory framework for an automated transmission of odometer readings of cars that are equipped with connectivity functions to complete mileage recordings taken from manual entries at PTI and other sources;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 8 – indent 2 - if positively assessed, create the legal and regulatory framework for an automated transmission of odometer readings of cars that are equipped with connectivity functions;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 8 – indent 3 -
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 10 – introductory part Until now, odometer fraud is not a criminal offence in all Member States, although Directive 2014/45/EU explicitly calls for that. Having effective legal measures enforced, including fines and penalties is crucial for eradicating odometer fraud. Therefore, following measures should be proposed:
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 10 – indent 1 Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas buyers of cars with manipulated odometers can experience increased maintenance and repair costs due to unexpected wear and tear which also negatively affects road safety if cars are not inspected and maintained according to their real mileage;
Amendment 14 #
E. whereas
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the second-hand car market in the European Union, which is two to three times larger than the market of new cars, has the lowest consumer trust among goods markets2 and odometer tampering seriously contributes to the loss of consumers’ trust in second-hand dealers and thus distorts the functioning of the internal market and fair competition; _________________ 2 Consumer Markets Scoreboard, European Commission 2014
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas consumers are not sufficiently informed about possible ways of preventing manipulation of odometer readings in second-hand cars and about existing techniques for monitoring mileage and preventing fraud in this area, and ways of gaining access to those techniques;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Ga. whereas many Member States are still failing to provide consumers with the necessary tools that would enable them to verify the history of a used vehicle;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas mileage fraud disproportionally affects social groups and geographical areas with lower income, exposing customers in
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas mileage fraud disproportionally affects social groups and geographical areas with lower income, exposing
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 a (new) - having regard to Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/11511a, Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council (EC) 661/20091b and UNECE Regulation 39, _________________ 1aCommission Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 of 1 June 2017 supplementing Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information, amending Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 and Commission Regulation (EU) No 1230/2012 and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 (OJ L 175, 7.7.2017, p. 1). 1bRegulation (EC) No 661/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning type-approval requirements for the general safety of motor vehicles, their trailers and systems, components and separate technical units intended therefor (OJ L 200, 31.7.2009, p. 1).
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. whereas, in the absence of a common, integrated system for exchange of information between Member States, there is an increased risk of legalising a mileage reading already manipulated before its initial verification in the country in which the car will ultimately be registered and where there are already measures to register the vehicle and verify its mileage;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. whereas tackling odometer tampering would have an immediate effect and bring substantial benefits to millions of European customers;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) Ha. whereas tackling odometer tampering would benefit and better protect millions of European consumers;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H b (new) Hb. whereas the establishment of uniform rules to prevent manipulation of meter readings will fundamentally enhance security and certainty in the cross-border purchases of vehicles and reduce the scale of unfair practices;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas some Member States have already introduced instruments to minimise odometer manipulation like “Car-Pass” in Belgium and “Nationale AutoPas” (NAP) in the Netherlands; whereas both use a database collecting odometer readings at every maintenance, service, repair or periodical inspection of the vehicle, without collecting any personal data and have both almost eradicated odometer fraud in their domains within a short timeframe;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) Ia. whereas odometer fraud is an urgent problem requiring realistic measures in the immediate term that could be of tangible benefit to millions of European consumers;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) Ia. whereas tackling mileage fraud would have immediate and tangible benefits for millions of European consumers
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas the significantly higher number of manipulated cars in countries without access to these databases shows that cross-border data exchange
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital M a (new) Ma. whereas Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 obliges manufacturers, in order to obtain type-approval for a vehicle, to implement systematic tamper- protection strategies and write-protect features to deter reprogramming of odometers, also taking account of remote data exchange features; whereas it only requires information and explications provided by the manufacturer and does not foresee any testing if the odometer is tampering proof while there are certified and internationally recognized processes like Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas odometer manipulation is prohibited in 26 Member States , only ten of them have additional measures to verify the mileage available to customers and only six recognise odometer manipulation as criminal offense3;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 — having regard to the E
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital N N. whereas odometer manipulation is prohibited in 26 Member States , only ten of them have additional measures to verify the mileage available to customers and only six recognise odometer manipulation as criminal offense3, and whereas more Member States are on the way to criminalising activities connected with the illegal manipulation of meter readings; _________________ 3 European Consumer Centers Network (ECC-Net, 2015), Cross-border car purchases: what to look out when you’re bargain hunting, p.236
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O O. whereas Directive 2014/45/EU recognises odometer fraud as threat to roadworthiness and calls on Member States to impose effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties on such manipulations;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O O. whereas Directive 2014/45/EU recognises odometer fraud as threat to roadworthiness and calls on Member States to impose effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties on such manipulations; further obliges the Commission to establish a
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital O O. whereas
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital P P. whereas Directive 2014/45/EU contains the obligation to record mileage readings during the periodical technical inspection (PTI) and makes these recordings available for the subsequent PTIs
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital Q Q. whereas Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 obliges manufacturers, in order to obtain type-approval for a vehicle, to implement systematic tamper-protection strategies and write-protect features to deter reprogramming of odometers, also taking account of remote data exchange features; whereas it only requires information and explications provided by the manufacturer and does not foresee any testing if the odometer is tampering proof; whereas internationally recognised processes such as the Common Criteria (ISO/IEC 15408), for instance, can help safeguard against tampering;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital R R. whereas neither Directives 2007/46/EC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 on type approval, nor UNECE Regulation 39 take account of mileage fraud and tamper-proof odometers; whereas the General Safety Regulation (EC) 661/2009 makes a reference to UNECE Regulation 39 regarding approval requirements for the speedometer, there are no requirements for the odometer or its essential characteristics;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital S S. whereas the automotive industry has made huge progress in developing and producing vehicles that are connected, use ITS and communicate with their environment so that most cars entering the market are already capable of connectivity features thus creating an almost completely connected car fleet on Europe’s roads;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital T Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 9 a (new) - having regard to European Parliament Written Declaration 0030/2016 of 11 April 2016 on combating mileage fraud in the second-hand car market;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital T T. whereas most cars entering the market are already capable of connectivity features thus
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Recital U U. whereas, according to various surveys, the average age of cars on European roads is
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Recital W W. whereas blockchain technology could be
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to pursue the overall goal of creating legal, technical and operational barriers to make manipulations either impossible or so time consuming, difficult and expensive that it is no longer lucrative; calls on the Commission to review the statutory requirements of Regulation (EU) 2017/1151;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to pursue the overall goal of creating legal, technical and operational barriers to make odometer manipulations
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the Commission to report as soon as possible on the findings obtained from a feasibility study on the use of the electronic vehicle information system;
Amendment 47 #
1a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that the same legal and technical barriers are also applied to imports from non-EU countries;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Underlines that technical solutions like HSM and SHE are already widely used to protect sensitive data in cars and that odometer readings should enjoy the same level of protection in order to prevent odometers from being easily manipulated;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 9 b (new) - having regard to Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/11511a;
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission to thoroughly monitor the implementation of Regulation 2017/1151 regarding the requirements on technology security for odometers, adjust those requirements if necessary, within the shortest timeframe possible and to report to the Parliament about the effectiveness of the regulation;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Notes that national solutions using databases of frequent odometer readings from PTI, garage visits and other vehicle inspections achieved great success in fighting odometer manipulation in the respective Member States, and therefore proposes that those Member States that, to date, have failed to act accordingly should establish appropriate solutions as quickly as possible;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to work together to develop a communication strategy aimed at providing adequate information for consumers and other stakeholders about ways of detecting and preventing falsification of odometer readings and about access to existing databases;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Emphasises in this regard that
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Emphasises in this regard that
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls upon the European Commission to propose a legislative framework for Member States to set up comparable and mutually compatible national data collection mechanisms, based on existing best practices, to provide for frequent and reliable mileage data collection from many sources and starting at the time of a vehicle’s first registration, at reasonable cost;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Underlines that a buyer of a second-hand vehicle should be able to verify the accuracy of its odometer reading, based on the collected mileage data from that vehicle since its first registration, which makes the access to cross-border data of odometer readings an indispensable tool to provide consumer protection;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Notes that odometer tampering is even more relevant in cross-border trade of used vehicles, which is mainly due to the lack of effective cooperation at supranational level and an insufficient exchange of information on mileage readings of odometers in vehicles traded between Member States;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that consumers need to have easy access to odometer readings;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 1 a (new) - having regard to Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/11511a, Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council (EC) 661/20091b, Commission Regulation No. 692/20081c and UNECE Regulation 39. _________________ 1aCommission Regulation (EU) 2017/1151 of 1 June 2017 supplementing Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information, amending Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 and Commission Regulation (EU) No 1230/2012 and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 (OJ L 175, 7.7.2017, p. 1). 1bRegulation (EC) No 661/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning type-approval requirements for the general safety of motor vehicles, their trailers and systems, components and separate technical units intended therefor (OJ L 200, 31.7.2009, p. 1). 1c Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 of 18 July 2008 implementing and amending Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information (OJ L 199, 28.7.2008, p. 1).
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Underlines that EUCARIS offers an existing infrastructure for cost-effective exchange of odometer readings across the Union based on a database solution and therefore encourages Member States to participate in exploiting the opportunities afforded by this system;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls on the Commission to propose framework provisions for the registration and storage of odometer readings by the Member States, using comparable methods and timescales and compatible national databases, thereby facilitating efficient exchanges of odometer readings;
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Regrets that in 2017 only Belgium, the Netherlands and Slovakia made use of the EUCARIS platform to exchange information on odometer readings;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Calls on the Commission to make participation in EUCARIS mandatory and to implement it as a vehicle information platform thus facilitating mileage verification throughout the whole Union, with a view to reducing the possibilities for odometer manipulation;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Regrets the fact that the electronic register from directive 2014/45/EU has not been established yet and that the Member States’ penalties are not dissuasive enough, as a result of which the data exchange objectives have not been met;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. C
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. C
Amendment 7 #
A. whereas odometer tampering, i.e. the malpractice of deliberate and unauthorised altering of the real mileage of a vehicle shown on its odometer, is a serious and widespread problem throughout the whole European Union especially in cross-border trade; whereas odometer fraud is financially worthwhile in that, as a result, higher prices can be obtained for second-hand cars, and technical solutions must be found in order to make it more difficult for non- professionals to tamper with odometers;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Considers a shorter period for the first mandatory PTI more
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Emphasises that, in future, shifting to a blockchain based solution is preferable, since that could be more cost- effective while providing high quality and security
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Emphasizes that the blockchain technology presents interesting potentials to provide users with an effective fraud prevention system, also increasing transparency and protecting privacy of data;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Underlines that wider application of advanced cryptographic technologies, such as Hardware Security Modules (HSM) or Secure Hardware Extensions (SHE) based solutions, could provide additional protection against odometer manipulations, protecting odometers from non authorised access by way of secured chips;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Emphasises that vehicles have become increasingly capable of connectivity and that this development will continue thus allowing to automatically feed odometer data into a database or a blockchain network; welcomes the automotive industry’s efforts to develop a variety of technical safeguards against odometer tampering and to make improper access more difficult through data encryption (AES), including with regard to data protection and security;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Highlights that all measures involving transmission and storage of data should follow the European data protection acquis and only be practiced for preventing odometer manipulation;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas odometer tampering, i.e. the malpractice of deliberate and unauthorised altering of the real mileage of a vehicle shown on its odometer, is a serious and widespread problem throughout the whole European Union especially in cross-border trade and harms third countries, which import second- hand cars from the European Union;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Highlights that all measures involving transmission and storage of data should follow the European data protection acquis and the highest level of cyber protection;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on Member States to improve their legislation on odometer fraud in order to
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on Member States to
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on Member States to improve their legislation on odometer fraud in order to make it a criminal offence and to provide sufficient human and financial resources for the enforcement;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on Member States to improve their legislation on odometer fraud - as regards both the provision of hardware and software and the related services - in order to make it a criminal offence;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Calls on Member States to improve their legislation - or in case they do not have any, to create a specific one - on odometer fraud in order to make it a criminal offence;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Believes that swapping one vehicle odometer for another with a lower mileage reading, if the aim in so doing is to conceal the real mileage and thereby make a profit, should be considered vehicle mileage fraud;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to implement stronger legislative measures at EU and national level, calling for stricter controls and mandatory recording of mileage readings when any kind of vehicle check occurs;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Calls on the Commission and all Member States to require from 2020 that odometer manipulation is proved to be excluded when motor vehicles are exported to third countries;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Calls on vehicle manufacturers to develop and implement more effective technical solutions to prevent manipulations or make them much more difficult and costly for fraudsters;
Amendment 9 #
A. whereas odometer tampering, i.e. the malpractice of deliberate
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Requests the Commission to submit by 2019, on the basis of Article 91(1) and Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, a proposal for an act on measures tackling odometer manipulation, following the recommendations set out in the Annex hereto;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Calls on the Commission to carry out an impact study covering both the costs to manufacturers and the positive effects for consumers;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Considers that the requested proposal does not have major financial implications affecting manufacturers in the internal market by comparison with non-European manufacturers;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Calls on the Commission to propose a legislative framework, within a timeframe of twelve months after the adoption of this report by the European Parliament, for Member States to set up national data collection mechanisms, based on best practices; these mileage data collection should be mutually compatible, exchanged and interconnected between Member States, within the existing framework of EUCARIS;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Calls on the Commission to propose a legislative framework following the recommendations in the annex within a timeframe of twelve months after the adoption of this report by the European Parliament;
Amendment 96 #
-
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Annex I – paragraph 2 – indent 2 -
source: 616.846
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/3/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE615.366New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-PR-615366_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE616.846New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-616846_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/2/body |
EC
|
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0155&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0155_EN.html |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0235New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0235_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
TRAN/8/09920New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 47
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 46
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/4 |
|
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 150
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 046New
Rules of Procedure EP 46 |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Procedure completed |
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
activities/0/committees/0/date |
2017-04-18T00:00:00
|
activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/0/committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/date |
2017-04-18T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
other/0 |
|
activities/0 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
TRAN/8/09920
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|