BETA


2017/2216(INI) Annual report 2016 on the protection of the EU’s financial interests - Fight against fraud

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CONT PARGNEAUX Gilles (icon: S&D S&D) MARINESCU Marian-Jean (icon: PPE PPE), CZARNECKI Ryszard (icon: ECR ECR), ALI Nedzhmi (icon: ALDE ALDE), DE JONG Dennis (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), JÁVOR Benedek (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), VALLI Marco (icon: EFDD EFDD), JALKH Jean-François (icon: ENF ENF)
Committee Opinion LIBE KUDRYCKA Barbara (icon: PPE PPE) Dennis de JONG (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), Monica MACOVEI (icon: ECR ECR)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2018/09/21
   Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2018/05/03
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2018/05/03
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 558 votes to 45, with 40 abstentions, a resolution on the annual report 2016 on the protection of the EU’s financial interests – Fight against fraud.

Better fraud detection: Member States and the Commission have shared responsibility for implementing approximately 74 % of the Union’s budget for 2016 . Members welcomed that the total number of fraudulent and non-fraudulent irregularities reported in 2016 (19 080 cases) was 15 % lower than in 2015 (22 349 cases) and their value had decreased by 8 % (from EUR 3.21 billion in 2015 to EUR 2.97 billion in 2016).

Parliament deplored the fact that not all Member States have adopted national anti-fraud strategies and that there is still a gap between the Member States in the reporting process. It called for a set of measures to be taken to ensure closer, more effective and more efficient cooperation in the area of fraud detection. The Commission is urged to: (i) establish a uniform system for the collection of comparable data on irregularities and cases of fraud from the Member States; (ii) continue its efforts to help Member States to step up the level and quality of inspections.

PIF Directive and European Public Prosecutors ‘s Office Regulation : Parliament welcomed the adoption of the Directive on the fight against fraud to the Union’s financial interests by means of criminal law (the PIF Directive ), which includes cross-border VAT fraud involving total damages of at least EUR 10 million.

It also welcomed the decision of 20 Member States to proceed with the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office through enhanced cooperation. In this context, it called for effective cooperation among Member States, the EPPO, OLAF and Eurojust.

Revenue - Own resources : VAT yielded almost EUR 1 035.3 billion in 2015, and contributed EUR 18.3 billion to EU own resources, or 13.9 % of the EU’s total revenue in the same year. The Missing Trader Intra-Community (MTIC) fraud, commonly called carousel fraud, alone was responsible for VAT revenue losses of approximately EUR 50 billion in 2015.

Members expressed concern about losses due to the VAT gap and fraud relating to EU VAT , which amounted to EUR 159.5 billion in 2015. They emphasised that the problems related to cross-border VAT fraud demand strong, coordinated and speedy measures. The Commission is urged to speed up its procedures to present its proposals for a definitive VAT system as provided for in the action plan.

Parliament called on Member States to improve their cooperation to combat tobacco smuggling into the European Union, which represents an estimated annual loss of EUR 10 billion on public revenue to the EU and Member States' budgets.

It also invited the Commission to:

strengthen the common policy on customs checks by providing for genuine harmonisation, focusing in particular on efforts to combat trade in illicit and counterfeit products; recover from the United Kingdom Government a shortfall of EUR 1.987 billion, an amount that should normally have returned to the Union budget; set up a system to calculate the total sums recovered following OLAF's recommendations.

Expenditure : Members regretted that this is the fourth year in which the irregularities reported as fraudulent in direct management increased in number and value (EUR 0.78 million in 2015 and EUR 6.25 million in 2016). They called on the Commission to present by the end of 2018 a specific plan to reduce fraud in this area. The resolution noted the following:

that the number of reported fraudulent and non-fraudulent irregularities concerning the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), while decreasing from 3 250 cases in 2015 to 2 676 cases in 2016, is still twice as high as in 2012, but wished to highlight that the amounts concerned in 2016 are only 8 % higher than in 2012; the 8 497 fraudulent and non-fraudulent irregularities linked to cohesion policy and fisheries in 2016 represented a 22 % decrease compared to 2015, but are still 25 % higher than the average for the last five years; of almost one third of the irregularities reported as fraudulent in 2016 in cohesion policy, no information was provided on the priority area concerned; the level of irregularities due to non-compliance with public procurement rules remains high. The Commission is invited to develop a database of irregularities, capable of providing a basis for meaningful analysis in a comprehensive way of the frequency, seriousness and causes of public procurement errors.

In view of the problems highlighted, Parliament suggested taking the following measures:

1) Improving controls : Members called for firmer measures against fraudulent irregularities and that non-fraudulent irregularities should be eliminated using administrative measures, in particular by introducing more transparent and simpler requirements.

In particular, a system enabling the authorities to exchange information would facilitate the cross-checking of accounting records for transactions between two or more Member States in order to prevent cross-border fraud in respect of the structural and investment funds.

2) Preventative actions : Parliament called for the strengthening of the implementation of the Early Detection and Exclusion System (EDES) and Anti-Fraud Information System (AFIS) and for the completion of the national antifraud strategies.

The Commission is invited to:

submit as a matter of urgency a horizontal legislative proposal on the protection of whistleblowers in order to effectively prevent and combat fraud affecting the financial interests of the European Union; investigative journalism should be encouraged by legal means both in the Member States and within the Union; commit to a much more credible and comprehensive anti-corruption strategy . Members recalled that in its resolution of 25 October 2016 , Parliament called for the establishment of an annual report on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights, including country-specific recommendations, with special focus on corruption; put in place, at EU level, all necessary measures to track and trace Philip Morris International tobacco products and to bring legal action in the event of any illegal seizures of this manufacturer’s products until all provisions of the Tobacco Products Directive are fully enforceable.

OLAF investigations : Parliament called on the Commission to ensure full implementation of OLAF’s recommendations in the Member States. It deplored the fact that despite numerous OLAF recommendations and investigations, the prosecution rate is only 30 % in the Member States and the judicial authorities of some Member States do not regard OLAF’s recommendations on the misspending of EU money as a priority.

Documents
2018/05/03
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2018/05/02
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2018/04/09
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Details

The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted an own-initiative report by Gilles PARGNEAUX (S&D, FR) on the annual report 2016 on the protection of the EU’s financial interests – Fight against fraud.

Member States and the Commission have shared responsibility for implementing approximately 74 % of the Union’s budget for 2016.

Members welcomed that the total number of fraudulent and non-fraudulent irregularities reported in 2016 (19 080 cases) was 15 % lower than in 2015 (22 349 cases) and their value had decreased by 8 % (from EUR 3.21 billion in 2015 to EUR 2.97 billion in 2016).

Members deplored the fact that not all Member States have adopted national anti-fraud strategies and that there is still a gap between the Member States in the reporting process. The Commission is invited to continue its efforts to help Member States to step up the level and quality of inspections and share best practices in combating fraud.

The report welcomed the adoption of the Directive on the fight against fraud to the Union’s financial interests by means of criminal law (the PIF Directive ), which includes cross-border VAT fraud involving total damages of at least EUR 10 million.

It also welcomed the decision of 20 Member States to proceed with the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office through enhanced cooperation. In this context, it called for effective cooperation among Member States, the EPPO, OLAF and Eurojust.

Revenue - own resources : Members expressed concern about losses due to the VAT gap and fraud relating to EU VAT , which amounted to EUR 159.5 billion in 2015. They emphasised that the problems related to cross-border VAT fraud demand strong, coordinated and speedy measures. The Commission is urged to speed up its procedures to present its proposals for a definitive VAT system as provided for in the action plan.

Tobacco smuggling into the European Union has intensified in recent years and is estimated to result in an annual loss of EUR 10 billion in public revenue to the EU and Member States’ budget. The latter should improve their efforts to combat these illegal activities.

Members deplored the disparities in the customs checks carried out within the EU and the large amounts involved in fraud affecting the own resource collection system. They called on the Commission to strengthen the common policy on customs checks by providing for genuine harmonisation with a view to improving the collection of traditional own resources and to ensure the EU’s security and economic interests, focusing in particular on efforts to combat trade in illicit and counterfeit products.

Expenditure : Members regretted that this is the fourth year in which the irregularities reported as fraudulent in direct management increased in number and value (EUR 0.78 million in 2015 and EUR 6.25 million in 2016).They called on the Commission to present by the end of 2018 a specific plan to reduce fraud in this area.

The report noted that the number of reported fraudulent and non-fraudulent irregularities concerning the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), while decreasing from 3 250 cases in 2015 to 2 676 cases in 2016, is still twice as high as in 2012, but wished to highlight that the amounts concerned in 2016 are only 8 % higher than in 2012.

The 8 497 fraudulent and non-fraudulent irregularities linked to cohesion policy and fisheries in 2016 represented a 22 % decrease compared to 2015, but are still 25 % higher than the average for the last five years.

The level of irregularities due to non-compliance with public procurement rules remains high. The Commission is invited to develop a database of irregularities, capable of providing a basis for meaningful analysis in a comprehensive way of the frequency, seriousness and causes of public procurement errors.

In view of the problems highlighted, the report suggested taking the following measures:

Improving controls : Members called for firmer measures against fraudulent irregularities and that non-fraudulent irregularities should be eliminated using administrative measures, in particular by introducing more transparent and simpler requirements.

In particular, a system enabling the authorities to exchange information would facilitate the cross-checking of accounting records for transactions between two or more Member States in order to prevent cross-border fraud in respect of the structural and investment funds.

Prevention : the report called for the strengthening of the implementation of the Early Detection and Exclusion System (EDES) and Anti-Fraud Information System (AFIS) and for the completion of the national antifraud strategies.

The Commission is invited to:

submit as a matter of urgency a horizontal legislative proposal on the protection of whistleblowers in order to effectively prevent and combat fraud affecting the financial interests of the European Union; investigative journalism should be encouraged by legal means both in the Member States and within the Union; commit to a much more credible and comprehensive anti-corruption strategy. Members recalled that in its resolution of 25 October 2016 , Parliament called for the establishment of an annual report on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights, including country-specific recommendations, with special focus on corruption; put in place, at EU level, all necessary measures to track and trace Philip Morris International tobacco products and to bring legal action in the event of any illegal seizures of this manufacturer’s products until all provisions of the Tobacco Products Directive are fully enforceable.

OLAF investigations : Members deplored the fact that despite numerous OLAF recommendations and investigations, the prosecution rate is only 30 % in the Member States and the judicial authorities of some Member States do not regard OLAF’s recommendations on the misspending of EU money as a priority.

Also deploring the fact that around 50 % of OLAF cases are dismissed by national judicial authorities, Members called on the Member States, the Commission and OLAF to lay down conditions for the admissibility of evidence provided by OLAF.

Documents
2018/03/26
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2018/02/20
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/02/01
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2017/12/07
   EP - Committee Opinion
2017/11/17
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2017/10/26
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2017/10/11
   EP - Responsible Committee

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0135/2018 - Gilles Pargneaux - vote unique 03/05/2018 11:41:22.000 #

2018/05/03 Outcome: +: 558, -: 55, 0: 40
DE FR ES IT PL RO NL BE SE PT AT BG EL CZ LT SK HR FI SI LU LV IE DK HU EE MT CY ?? GB
Total
87
63
45
58
48
28
24
19
18
18
18
15
18
17
11
13
9
11
8
6
6
9
10
15
5
5
6
1
60
icon: PPE PPE
193

Luxembourg PPE

3

Latvia PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

United Kingdom PPE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
156

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Finland S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Denmark S&D

2
3

Malta S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
52

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
42

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

4

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Italy ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Belgium ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

3

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
17

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark NI

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
31

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

Against (1)

3

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
106 2017/2216(INI)
2018/02/01 CONT 77 amendments...
source: 616.654
2018/02/02 LIBE 29 amendments...
source: 618.034

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
rapporteur
name: PARGNEAUX Gilles date: 2017-10-11T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2017-10-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PARGNEAUX Gilles group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: KUDRYCKA Barbara date: 2017-12-07T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2017-12-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KUDRYCKA Barbara group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2017-10-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PARGNEAUX Gilles group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2017-10-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PARGNEAUX Gilles group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
activities
  • date: 2017-10-26T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: MARINESCU Marian-Jean group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard group: ALDE name: ALI Nedzhmi group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: Verts/ALE name: JÁVOR Benedek group: EFD name: VALLI Marco group: ENF name: JALKH Jean-François responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2017-10-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: S&D name: PARGNEAUX Gilles body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2017-12-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: KUDRYCKA Barbara
  • date: 2018-03-26T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: MARINESCU Marian-Jean group: ECR name: CZARNECKI Ryszard group: ALDE name: ALI Nedzhmi group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: Verts/ALE name: JÁVOR Benedek group: EFD name: VALLI Marco group: ENF name: JALKH Jean-François responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2017-10-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: S&D name: PARGNEAUX Gilles body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2017-12-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: KUDRYCKA Barbara
  • date: 2018-04-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0135&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0135/2018 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2018-05-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180502&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2018-05-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=30992&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0196 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0196/2018 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Budget commissioner: OETTINGER Günther
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2017-10-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PARGNEAUX Gilles group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
CONT
date
2017-10-11T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgetary Control
rapporteur
group: S&D name: PARGNEAUX Gilles
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2017-12-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KUDRYCKA Barbara group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
LIBE
date
2017-12-07T00:00:00
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur
group: EPP name: KUDRYCKA Barbara
docs
  • date: 2017-11-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE612.146 title: PE612.146 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2018-02-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE616.654 title: PE616.654 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2018-02-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE615.289&secondRef=02 title: PE615.289 committee: LIBE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2018-09-21T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=30992&j=0&l=en title: SP(2018)482 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2017-10-26T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2018-03-26T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2018-04-09T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0135&language=EN title: A8-0135/2018 summary: The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted an own-initiative report by Gilles PARGNEAUX (S&D, FR) on the annual report 2016 on the protection of the EU’s financial interests – Fight against fraud. Member States and the Commission have shared responsibility for implementing approximately 74 % of the Union’s budget for 2016. Members welcomed that the total number of fraudulent and non-fraudulent irregularities reported in 2016 (19 080 cases) was 15 % lower than in 2015 (22 349 cases) and their value had decreased by 8 % (from EUR 3.21 billion in 2015 to EUR 2.97 billion in 2016). Members deplored the fact that not all Member States have adopted national anti-fraud strategies and that there is still a gap between the Member States in the reporting process. The Commission is invited to continue its efforts to help Member States to step up the level and quality of inspections and share best practices in combating fraud. The report welcomed the adoption of the Directive on the fight against fraud to the Union’s financial interests by means of criminal law (the PIF Directive ), which includes cross-border VAT fraud involving total damages of at least EUR 10 million. It also welcomed the decision of 20 Member States to proceed with the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office through enhanced cooperation. In this context, it called for effective cooperation among Member States, the EPPO, OLAF and Eurojust. Revenue - own resources : Members expressed concern about losses due to the VAT gap and fraud relating to EU VAT , which amounted to EUR 159.5 billion in 2015. They emphasised that the problems related to cross-border VAT fraud demand strong, coordinated and speedy measures. The Commission is urged to speed up its procedures to present its proposals for a definitive VAT system as provided for in the action plan. Tobacco smuggling into the European Union has intensified in recent years and is estimated to result in an annual loss of EUR 10 billion in public revenue to the EU and Member States’ budget. The latter should improve their efforts to combat these illegal activities. Members deplored the disparities in the customs checks carried out within the EU and the large amounts involved in fraud affecting the own resource collection system. They called on the Commission to strengthen the common policy on customs checks by providing for genuine harmonisation with a view to improving the collection of traditional own resources and to ensure the EU’s security and economic interests, focusing in particular on efforts to combat trade in illicit and counterfeit products. Expenditure : Members regretted that this is the fourth year in which the irregularities reported as fraudulent in direct management increased in number and value (EUR 0.78 million in 2015 and EUR 6.25 million in 2016).They called on the Commission to present by the end of 2018 a specific plan to reduce fraud in this area. The report noted that the number of reported fraudulent and non-fraudulent irregularities concerning the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), while decreasing from 3 250 cases in 2015 to 2 676 cases in 2016, is still twice as high as in 2012, but wished to highlight that the amounts concerned in 2016 are only 8 % higher than in 2012. The 8 497 fraudulent and non-fraudulent irregularities linked to cohesion policy and fisheries in 2016 represented a 22 % decrease compared to 2015, but are still 25 % higher than the average for the last five years. The level of irregularities due to non-compliance with public procurement rules remains high. The Commission is invited to develop a database of irregularities, capable of providing a basis for meaningful analysis in a comprehensive way of the frequency, seriousness and causes of public procurement errors. In view of the problems highlighted, the report suggested taking the following measures: Improving controls : Members called for firmer measures against fraudulent irregularities and that non-fraudulent irregularities should be eliminated using administrative measures, in particular by introducing more transparent and simpler requirements. In particular, a system enabling the authorities to exchange information would facilitate the cross-checking of accounting records for transactions between two or more Member States in order to prevent cross-border fraud in respect of the structural and investment funds. Prevention : the report called for the strengthening of the implementation of the Early Detection and Exclusion System (EDES) and Anti-Fraud Information System (AFIS) and for the completion of the national antifraud strategies. The Commission is invited to: submit as a matter of urgency a horizontal legislative proposal on the protection of whistleblowers in order to effectively prevent and combat fraud affecting the financial interests of the European Union; investigative journalism should be encouraged by legal means both in the Member States and within the Union; commit to a much more credible and comprehensive anti-corruption strategy. Members recalled that in its resolution of 25 October 2016 , Parliament called for the establishment of an annual report on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights, including country-specific recommendations, with special focus on corruption; put in place, at EU level, all necessary measures to track and trace Philip Morris International tobacco products and to bring legal action in the event of any illegal seizures of this manufacturer’s products until all provisions of the Tobacco Products Directive are fully enforceable. OLAF investigations : Members deplored the fact that despite numerous OLAF recommendations and investigations, the prosecution rate is only 30 % in the Member States and the judicial authorities of some Member States do not regard OLAF’s recommendations on the misspending of EU money as a priority. Also deploring the fact that around 50 % of OLAF cases are dismissed by national judicial authorities, Members called on the Member States, the Commission and OLAF to lay down conditions for the admissibility of evidence provided by OLAF.
  • date: 2018-05-02T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180502&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2018-05-03T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=30992&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2018-05-03T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0196 title: T8-0196/2018 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 558 votes to 45, with 40 abstentions, a resolution on the annual report 2016 on the protection of the EU’s financial interests – Fight against fraud. Better fraud detection: Member States and the Commission have shared responsibility for implementing approximately 74 % of the Union’s budget for 2016 . Members welcomed that the total number of fraudulent and non-fraudulent irregularities reported in 2016 (19 080 cases) was 15 % lower than in 2015 (22 349 cases) and their value had decreased by 8 % (from EUR 3.21 billion in 2015 to EUR 2.97 billion in 2016). Parliament deplored the fact that not all Member States have adopted national anti-fraud strategies and that there is still a gap between the Member States in the reporting process. It called for a set of measures to be taken to ensure closer, more effective and more efficient cooperation in the area of fraud detection. The Commission is urged to: (i) establish a uniform system for the collection of comparable data on irregularities and cases of fraud from the Member States; (ii) continue its efforts to help Member States to step up the level and quality of inspections. PIF Directive and European Public Prosecutors ‘s Office Regulation : Parliament welcomed the adoption of the Directive on the fight against fraud to the Union’s financial interests by means of criminal law (the PIF Directive ), which includes cross-border VAT fraud involving total damages of at least EUR 10 million. It also welcomed the decision of 20 Member States to proceed with the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office through enhanced cooperation. In this context, it called for effective cooperation among Member States, the EPPO, OLAF and Eurojust. Revenue - Own resources : VAT yielded almost EUR 1 035.3 billion in 2015, and contributed EUR 18.3 billion to EU own resources, or 13.9 % of the EU’s total revenue in the same year. The Missing Trader Intra-Community (MTIC) fraud, commonly called carousel fraud, alone was responsible for VAT revenue losses of approximately EUR 50 billion in 2015. Members expressed concern about losses due to the VAT gap and fraud relating to EU VAT , which amounted to EUR 159.5 billion in 2015. They emphasised that the problems related to cross-border VAT fraud demand strong, coordinated and speedy measures. The Commission is urged to speed up its procedures to present its proposals for a definitive VAT system as provided for in the action plan. Parliament called on Member States to improve their cooperation to combat tobacco smuggling into the European Union, which represents an estimated annual loss of EUR 10 billion on public revenue to the EU and Member States' budgets. It also invited the Commission to: strengthen the common policy on customs checks by providing for genuine harmonisation, focusing in particular on efforts to combat trade in illicit and counterfeit products; recover from the United Kingdom Government a shortfall of EUR 1.987 billion, an amount that should normally have returned to the Union budget; set up a system to calculate the total sums recovered following OLAF's recommendations. Expenditure : Members regretted that this is the fourth year in which the irregularities reported as fraudulent in direct management increased in number and value (EUR 0.78 million in 2015 and EUR 6.25 million in 2016). They called on the Commission to present by the end of 2018 a specific plan to reduce fraud in this area. The resolution noted the following: that the number of reported fraudulent and non-fraudulent irregularities concerning the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), while decreasing from 3 250 cases in 2015 to 2 676 cases in 2016, is still twice as high as in 2012, but wished to highlight that the amounts concerned in 2016 are only 8 % higher than in 2012; the 8 497 fraudulent and non-fraudulent irregularities linked to cohesion policy and fisheries in 2016 represented a 22 % decrease compared to 2015, but are still 25 % higher than the average for the last five years; of almost one third of the irregularities reported as fraudulent in 2016 in cohesion policy, no information was provided on the priority area concerned; the level of irregularities due to non-compliance with public procurement rules remains high. The Commission is invited to develop a database of irregularities, capable of providing a basis for meaningful analysis in a comprehensive way of the frequency, seriousness and causes of public procurement errors. In view of the problems highlighted, Parliament suggested taking the following measures: 1) Improving controls : Members called for firmer measures against fraudulent irregularities and that non-fraudulent irregularities should be eliminated using administrative measures, in particular by introducing more transparent and simpler requirements. In particular, a system enabling the authorities to exchange information would facilitate the cross-checking of accounting records for transactions between two or more Member States in order to prevent cross-border fraud in respect of the structural and investment funds. 2) Preventative actions : Parliament called for the strengthening of the implementation of the Early Detection and Exclusion System (EDES) and Anti-Fraud Information System (AFIS) and for the completion of the national antifraud strategies. The Commission is invited to: submit as a matter of urgency a horizontal legislative proposal on the protection of whistleblowers in order to effectively prevent and combat fraud affecting the financial interests of the European Union; investigative journalism should be encouraged by legal means both in the Member States and within the Union; commit to a much more credible and comprehensive anti-corruption strategy . Members recalled that in its resolution of 25 October 2016 , Parliament called for the establishment of an annual report on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights, including country-specific recommendations, with special focus on corruption; put in place, at EU level, all necessary measures to track and trace Philip Morris International tobacco products and to bring legal action in the event of any illegal seizures of this manufacturer’s products until all provisions of the Tobacco Products Directive are fully enforceable. OLAF investigations : Parliament called on the Commission to ensure full implementation of OLAF’s recommendations in the Member States. It deplored the fact that despite numerous OLAF recommendations and investigations, the prosecution rate is only 30 % in the Member States and the judicial authorities of some Member States do not regard OLAF’s recommendations on the misspending of EU money as a priority.
  • date: 2018-05-03T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/budget_en title: Budget commissioner: OETTINGER Günther
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CONT/8/11242
New
  • CONT/8/11242
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.70.04 Protecting financial interests of the EU against fraud
New
8.70.04
Protecting financial interests of the EU against fraud
activities/0
date
2017-10-26T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/1
date
2018-03-26T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/2/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: MARINESCU Marian-Jean group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: Verts/ALE name: JÁVOR Benedek responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2017-10-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: S&D name: PARGNEAUX Gilles
activities/2/date
Old
2017-10-26T00:00:00
New
2018-04-09T00:00:00
activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0135&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0135/2018
activities/2/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
activities/3
date
2018-05-02T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180502&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
body
EP
type
Debate in Parliament
activities/4
date
2018-05-03T00:00:00
docs
body
EP
type
Results of vote in Parliament
committees/0/shadows/1
group
ECR
name
CZARNECKI Ryszard
committees/0/shadows/2
group
ALDE
name
ALI Nedzhmi
committees/0/shadows/5
group
EFD
name
VALLI Marco
committees/0/shadows/6
group
ENF
name
JALKH Jean-François
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
LIBE
date
2017-12-07T00:00:00
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur
group: EPP name: KUDRYCKA Barbara
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/legal_basis/0
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
New
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Procedure completed
activities
  • date: 2017-10-26T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: MARINESCU Marian-Jean group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: Verts/ALE name: JÁVOR Benedek responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2017-10-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: S&D name: PARGNEAUX Gilles
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: MARINESCU Marian-Jean group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: Verts/ALE name: JÁVOR Benedek responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2017-10-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: S&D name: PARGNEAUX Gilles
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/budget_en title: Budget commissioner: OETTINGER Günther
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
CONT/8/11242
reference
2017/2216(INI)
title
Annual report 2016 on the protection of the EU’s financial interests - Fight against fraud
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Awaiting committee decision
subtype
Annual report
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
8.70.04 Protecting financial interests of the EU against fraud