BETA

Preparatory phase in Parliament



2018/0091(NLE) EU/Japan Economic Partnership Agreement
RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Opinion ENVI
Lead INTA
Opinion TRAN

Legal Basis TFEU 207, TFEU 218-p6a, TFEU 218-p7

Activites

  • 2018/04/18 Legislative proposal published
    • COM(2018)0192
    • DG {'url': 'http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/trade_en', 'title': 'Trade'}, MALMSTRÖM Cecilia

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: to conclude the Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Japan.

    PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.

    ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act.

    BACKGROUND: Japan is the world’s third largest economy outside of the EU in terms of GDP, yet only EU's seventh largest trading partner. It has a population of over 127 million inhabitants with a very high purchasing power. It is a key market for European Union exporters, services providers and investors.

    On 29 November 2012, the Council authorised the Commission to enter into negotiations for a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with Japan. The Free Trade Agreement with Japan was renamed the "Economic Partnership Agreement" (the EPA) at the time of the conclusion of an agreement in principle on 6 July 2017.

    On the basis of the negotiating directives adopted by the Council in 2012, the Commission has negotiated with Japan an ambitious and comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement with a view to creating new opportunities and legal certainty for trade and investment between both partners. The texts of the EPA after the finalisation of the negotiations were published in December 2017. 

    CONTENT: the Commission called on the Council to adopt the Decision to conclude the Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Japan.

    In line with the objectives set by the negotiating directives, the Commission notably secured the following:

    • Liberalisation of imports: Japan will liberalise 91% of its imports from the EU at entry into force of the Agreement. At the end of the staging period 99% of its imports from the EU will be liberalised, while the remaining imports (1%) will be partly liberalised through quotas and tariff reductions (in agriculture). In terms of tariff lines, Japan fully liberalises 86% of its tariff lines at entry into force, going up to 97% after 15 years. Major positive achievements for the EU include full liberalisation at entry into force for wines and sparkling wines, full liberalisation of other major agri-food exports (hard matured cheeses, pasta, chocolate, confectionery) over a transitional period; very significant concession achieving almost liberalisation for pigmeat over time; substantial improvement of market access conditions for EU exports of beef and all the other cheeses; as well as liberalisation of all European industrial exports, including old-standing priorities such as footwear and leather products.
    • Public procurement: EU companies will be able to participate on an equal footing with Japanese companies in bids for procurement tenders in the 48 so-called 'core cities' of Japan with around 300.000 to 500.00 inhabitants. The agreement also removes existing obstacles to procurement in the railway sector.
    • Removal of trade barriers: the removal of technical and regulatory trade barriers to trade is proposed in goods such as duplicative testing, in particular by promoting the use of technical and regulatory standards used in the EU in the sectors of motor vehicles, electronics, pharmaceuticals and medical devices as well as green technologies.
    • Trade in services: the EPA includes a chapter on Trade in Services, Investment Liberalisation and Electronic Commerce and the related schedules of commitments, which go significantly beyond both parties' WTO commitments. The chapter includes cross-cutting rules on domestic regulation and mutual recognition, and sector-specific rules designed to ensure a level playing field for EU businesses.
    • Corporate governance: for the first time in an EU trade agreement, there will be a specific chapter on corporate governance. It is based on the G20/OECD's Principles on Corporate Governance and reflects the EU's and Japan's best practices and rules in this area.
    • Intellectual Property Rights (IPR): the EPA sets out a high level protection of intellectual property rights, including with regard to the enforcement of these rights and including detailed provisions on copyright, providing for improved copyright protection.
    • Geographical Indications (GIs): it aims to ensure a high level of protection for EU GIs, with TRIPS Article 23 protection, for more than 200 foodstuffs and wines and spirits.
    • Sustainable development: the EPA includes all the key elements of the EU approach on sustainable development and is in line with other recent EU trade agreements. It includes a comprehensive chapter on trade and sustainable development, which aims at ensuring that trade supports environmental protection and social development and promotes the sustainable management of forests and fisheries. The chapter also sets out how civil society will be involved in its implementation and monitoring. It also includes a commitment to implement the Paris Agreement on Climate Change as well as a dedicated review mechanism.
    • SMEs: a specific chapter will enable smaller companies to benefit fully from the agreement, notably through increased transparency.
    • Wine exports: the EPA also includes a comprehensive section on the mutual facilitation of wine exports with the approval of several oenological practices including priority additives of each side.

    Joint committee: the EPA establishes a Joint committee that has as its main task to supervise and facilitate the implementation and application of the Agreement. It shall be comprised of representatives of the EU and of Japan who will meet once a year or in urgent cases at the request of either side.

    BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the EPA will have a financial impact on the EU budget on the side of the revenues. It will lead to an estimated loss of duties of EUR 970 million at the entry into force of the Agreement.

    After the EPA is fully implemented (after 15 years from its entry into force) the yearly loss of duties is estimated to reach EUR 2.084 billion. This estimation is based on a projection of the evolution of trade for the next 15 years without any agreement. On the other hand, the EPA is not expected to have a financial impact on the EU budget on the side of the expenditures.

activities/0/docs/0/type
Old
Legislative proposal published
New
Initial legislative proposal published
activities/0/type
Old
Legislative proposal published
New
Initial legislative proposal published
activities/1
date
2018-06-29T00:00:00
docs
url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=7964%2F18&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Legislative proposal published title: 07964/2018
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
commission
DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/trade_en title: Trade Commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
activities/2
date
2018-09-10T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/3
date
2018-11-05T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/4
date
2018-12-11T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0/committee
Old
ENVI
New
AGRI
committees/0/committee_full
Old
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
New
Agriculture and Rural Development
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ENVI
date
2018-05-29T00:00:00
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
rapporteur
group: ENF name: MÉLIN Joëlle
committees/2/date
2018-05-16T00:00:00
committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: SILVA PEREIRA Pedro
committees/2/shadows
  • group: EPP name: WAŁĘSA Jarosław
  • group: ECR name: KAMALL Syed
  • group: ALDE name: HIRSCH Nadja
  • group: GUE/NGL name: SCHOLZ Helmut
  • group: Verts/ALE name: BUCHNER Klaus
  • group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
INTA/8/12821
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
procedure/summary
  • Accompanying procedure
activities/0/commission/0
DG
Commissioner
MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52018PC0192:EN
activities
  • date: 2018-04-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2018/0192/COM_COM(2018)0192_EN.pdf type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(2018)0192 body: EC commission: type: Legislative proposal published
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
links
other
    procedure
    geographical_area
    Japan
    reference
    2018/0091(NLE)
    title
    EU/Japan Economic Partnership Agreement
    legal_basis
    stage_reached
    Preparatory phase in Parliament
    subtype
    Consent by Parliament
    type
    NLE - Non-legislative enactments
    subject
    6.20.03 Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations