BETA


2018/0091(NLE) EU/Japan Economic Partnership Agreement

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead INTA SILVA PEREIRA Pedro (icon: S&D S&D) HANSEN Christophe (icon: PPE PPE), KAMALL Syed (icon: ECR ECR), HIRSCH Nadja (icon: ALDE ALDE), SCHOLZ Helmut (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), BUCHNER Klaus (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), BEGHIN Tiziana (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Committee Opinion ENVI VĂLEAN Adina-Ioana (icon: PPE PPE) Jørn DOHRMANN (icon: ECR ECR), Anneli JÄÄTTEENMÄKI (icon: ALDE ALDE), Alojz PETERLE (icon: PPE PPE)
Committee Opinion TRAN
Committee Opinion AGRI SIEKIERSKI Czesław Adam (icon: PPE PPE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 207, TFEU 218-p6a, TFEU 218-p7

Events

2018/12/27
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to approve the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership.

NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Council Decision (EU) 2018/1907 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership.

CONTENT: the Council approved the Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership.

The EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) was signed on 17 July 2018. The objectives of the agreement are to liberalise and facilitate trade and investment and to promote closer economic relations between the Parties.

The EPA is a comprehensive and ambitious trade agreement which, when fully implemented, will remove 99% of EU tariff lines and 97% of Japanese tariff lines.

The agreement will create new opportunities for EU agricultural exports by removing existing Japanese tariffs on products such as cheese or wine, while protecting EU intellectual property rights on Japanese markets. It will also open up services markets and significantly increase EU companies' access to Japanese public procurement markets.

The EPA is based on the highest standards of labour, safety, environment and consumer protection. It includes a specific commitment to the Paris Agreement on Climate Change and the chapters on corporate governance and SMEs. It fully respects regulatory law and protects public services.

In order to ensure an efficient operation of the wine export facilitation system provided for in the Agreement, the Commission should be authorised to temporarily suspend the acceptance of self-certification of wine products as set out in the Agreement. The Commission should also be authorised to terminate that temporary suspension on behalf of the Union;

Modifications of Annex 14-A and Annex 14-B to the Agreement through decisions of the Joint Committee established by the Agreement, following recommendations of the Committee on Intellectual Property established by the Agreement, shall be approved by the Commission on behalf of the Union. Where interested parties cannot reach an agreement following objections relating to a geographical indication, the Commission shall adopt a position on the basis of the procedure laid down in Article 57(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality systems for agricultural products and foodstuffs.

ENTRY INTO FORCE: 20.12.2018.

2018/12/20
   EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament
2018/12/20
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2018/12/20
   CSL - Council Meeting
2018/12/12
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2018/12/12
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 474 votes to 152, with 40 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Japan on an economic partnership.

Parliament gave its consent to the conclusion of the agreement.

The negotiations between the European Union and Japan on an Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA), which began on 25 March 2013, were concluded on 8 December 2017. On 17 July 2018, on the occasion of the EU-Japan Summit in Tokyo, the EU and Japan signed the EPA and the Strategic Partnership Agreement.

The objectives of the agreement are to liberalise and facilitate trade and investment and to promote closer economic relations between the Parties.

Documents
2018/12/11
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2018/11/09
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The Committee on International Trade adopted the report by Pedro SILVA PEREIRA (S&D, PT) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Japan on an economic partnership.

The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament give its approval to the conclusion of the agreement.

As indicated in the explanatory memorandum accompanying the recommendation, the negotiations between the European Union and Japan on an Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA), which began on 25 March 2013, were concluded on 8 December 2017. On 17 July 2018, on the occasion of the EU-Japan Summit in Tokyo, the EU and Japan signed the EPA and the Strategic Partnership Agreement.

The European Parliament set out its negotiating priorities in its October 2012 resolution . The outcome of the negotiations reflects these priorities. Parliament was kept informed throughout the process and the Committee on International Trade closely followed the negotiations, from their preparation to the signing of the final agreement.

The EU-Japan EPA is of strategic importance. It is the most important bilateral trade agreement the EU has ever concluded: it covers almost a third of world GDP, almost 40% of international trade and affects more than 600 million people. Japan is the world's third largest consumer market, but only the EU's sixth largest trading partner.

This agreement will strengthen the current bilateral trade and political relationship.

The rapporteur considers that the agreement reached is balanced and comprehensive, and is of great economic value to the EU, its citizens and its businesses:

it opens up new trade opportunities, in particular for sectors which, like agriculture, are not generally the main beneficiaries of trade agreements; once the agreement is fully implemented, Japan will have removed tariffs on 97% of goods from the EU; it includes many new features such as the commitment to the Paris Agreement on Climate Change, and chapters on corporate governance and SMEs; it fully respects regulatory law and protects public services.

This agreement has the potential to contribute to generating sustainable growth and decent jobs while promoting the EU's values and maintaining high standards in areas such as food safety, environmental protection and workers' rights.

Documents
2018/11/05
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2018/10/25
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/10/18
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/10/17
   EP - VĂLEAN Adina-Ioana (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2018/10/09
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/09/24
   PT_PARLIAMENT - Contribution
Documents
2018/09/10
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2018/09/06
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2018/07/10
   EP - SIEKIERSKI Czesław Adam (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in AGRI
2018/06/29
   CSL - Document attached to the procedure
Documents
2018/06/29
   EC - Legislative proposal published
Details

PURPOSE: conclusion of the economic partnership agreement between the European Union and Japan.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.

ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act.

BACKGROUND: the agreement between the European Union and Japan on an economic partnership (EPA) has been signed and the agreement must now be approved.

CONTENT: the draft Council decision seeks approval of the agreement between the European Union and Japan on an economic partnership .

The objectives of the agreement are to liberalise and facilitate trade and investment and to promote closer economic relations between the Parties. The EU-Japan free trade agreement will create an open trade zone covering 600 million people and representing nearly a third of the world's GDP.

When fully implemented, the agreement:

remove 99% of tariffs applied to EU exports to Japan and also remove several regulatory barriers; create significant new opportunities for EU agricultural exports by removing existing Japanese tariffs on products such as cheese or wines, while protecting EU intellectual property rights on Japanese markets; shall also open up services markets and significantly increase EU companies' access to Japanese public procurement markets.

The EPA is based on the highest standards of labour, safety, environment and consumer protection.

In order to ensure an efficient operation of the wine export facilitation system provided for in the Agreement, the Commission shall be authorised to temporarily suspend, on behalf of the Union and as provided for in the Agreement, the acceptance of self-certification of wine products as set out in the Agreement. The Commission should also be authorised to terminate that temporary suspension on behalf of the Union. The Commission shall also be empowered to terminate this temporary suspension on behalf of the Union.

The Commission shall also be empowered by the Council to approve, on behalf of the Union, certain modifications to the Agreement.

For further details on the results of the negotiations, see also the summary of the Commission's original legislative proposal dated 18.4.2018.

Documents
2018/05/16
   EP - SILVA PEREIRA Pedro (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in INTA
2018/04/18
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2018/04/18
   EP - Preparatory document
Details

PURPOSE: to conclude the Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Japan.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.

ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act.

BACKGROUND: Japan is the world’s third largest economy outside of the EU in terms of GDP, yet only EU's seventh largest trading partner. It has a population of over 127 million inhabitants with a very high purchasing power. It is a key market for European Union exporters, services providers and investors.

On 29 November 2012, the Council authorised the Commission to enter into negotiations for a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with Japan. The Free Trade Agreement with Japan was renamed the "Economic Partnership Agreement" (the EPA) at the time of the conclusion of an agreement in principle on 6 July 2017.

On the basis of the negotiating directives adopted by the Council in 2012, the Commission has negotiated with Japan an ambitious and comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement with a view to creating new opportunities and legal certainty for trade and investment between both partners. The texts of the EPA after the finalisation of the negotiations were published in December 2017.

CONTENT: the Commission called on the Council to adopt the Decision to conclude the Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Japan.

In line with the objectives set by the negotiating directives, the Commission notably secured the following:

Liberalisation of imports : Japan will liberalise 91% of its imports from the EU at entry into force of the Agreement. At the end of the staging period 99% of its imports from the EU will be liberalised, while the remaining imports (1%) will be partly liberalised through quotas and tariff reductions (in agriculture). In terms of tariff lines, Japan fully liberalises 86% of its tariff lines at entry into force, going up to 97% after 15 years. Major positive achievements for the EU include full liberalisation at entry into force for wines and sparkling wines, full liberalisation of other major agri-food exports (hard matured cheeses, pasta, chocolate, confectionery) over a transitional period; very significant concession achieving almost liberalisation for pigmeat over time; substantial improvement of market access conditions for EU exports of beef and all the other cheeses; as well as liberalisation of all European industrial exports, including old-standing priorities such as footwear and leather products. Public procurement : EU companies will be able to participate on an equal footing with Japanese companies in bids for procurement tenders in the 48 so-called 'core cities' of Japan with around 300.000 to 500.00 inhabitants. The agreement also removes existing obstacles to procurement in the railway sector. Removal of trade barriers : the removal of technical and regulatory trade barriers to trade is proposed in goods such as duplicative testing, in particular by promoting the use of technical and regulatory standards used in the EU in the sectors of motor vehicles, electronics, pharmaceuticals and medical devices as well as green technologies. Trade in services : the EPA includes a chapter on Trade in Services, Investment Liberalisation and Electronic Commerce and the related schedules of commitments, which go significantly beyond both parties' WTO commitments. The chapter includes cross-cutting rules on domestic regulation and mutual recognition, and sector-specific rules designed to ensure a level playing field for EU businesses. Corporate governance : for the first time in an EU trade agreement, there will be a specific chapter on corporate governance. It is based on the G20/OECD's Principles on Corporate Governance and reflects the EU's and Japan's best practices and rules in this area. Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) : the EPA sets out a high level protection of intellectual property rights, including with regard to the enforcement of these rights and including detailed provisions on copyright, providing for improved copyright protection. Geographical Indications (GIs) : it aims to ensure a high level of protection for EU GIs, with TRIPS Article 23 protection, for more than 200 foodstuffs and wines and spirits. Sustainable development : the EPA includes all the key elements of the EU approach on sustainable development and is in line with other recent EU trade agreements. It includes a comprehensive chapter on trade and sustainable development, which aims at ensuring that trade supports environmental protection and social development and promotes the sustainable management of forests and fisheries. The chapter also sets out how civil society will be involved in its implementation and monitoring. It also includes a commitment to implement the Paris Agreement on Climate Change as well as a dedicated review mechanism. SMEs : a specific chapter will enable smaller companies to benefit fully from the agreement, notably through increased transparency. Wine exports : the EPA also includes a comprehensive section on the mutual facilitation of wine exports with the approval of several oenological practices including priority additives of each side.

Joint committee : the EPA establishes a Joint committee that has as its main task to supervise and facilitate the implementation and application of the Agreement. It shall be comprised of representatives of the EU and of Japan who will meet once a year or in urgent cases at the request of either side.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the EPA will have a financial impact on the EU budget on the side of the revenues . It will lead to an estimated loss of duties of EUR 970 million at the entry into force of the Agreement.

After the EPA is fully implemented (after 15 years from its entry into force) the yearly loss of duties is estimated to reach EUR 2.084 billion. This estimation is based on a projection of the evolution of trade for the next 15 years without any agreement. On the other hand, the EPA is not expected to have a financial impact on the EU budget on the side of the expenditures.

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0366/2018 - Pedro Silva Pereira - Approbation 12/12/2018 13:06:50.000 #

2018/12/12 Outcome: +: 474, -: 152, 0: 40
IT PL DE RO ES BG HU GB CZ SK LT HR FI PT NL SI DK MT SE EE EL LU LV BE CY AT ?? IE FR
Total
59
44
89
28
48
17
20
63
21
11
10
10
13
18
20
7
12
6
15
5
19
6
6
20
6
18
1
7
67
icon: PPE PPE
198

United Kingdom PPE

1

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Latvia PPE

2

Belgium PPE

4

Cyprus PPE

1

Ireland PPE

Against (1)

3
icon: S&D S&D
173
4

Czechia S&D

Against (1)

4

Lithuania S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3
4

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ECR ECR
68

Romania ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
2

Netherlands ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
60

Germany ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
35

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
19

Germany NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark NI

Against (1)

1

NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ENF ENF
30

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

For (1)

4
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3
5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
41

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

A8-0366/2018 - Pedro Silva Pereira - Approbation #

2018/12/12 Outcome: +: 474, -: 152, 0: 40
IT PL DE RO ES BG HU GB CZ SK LT HR FI PT NL SI DK MT SE EE EL LU LV BE CY AT ?? IE FR
Total
59
44
89
28
47
17
20
63
21
11
10
10
13
18
20
7
12
6
15
5
19
6
6
20
6
18
1
7
66
icon: PPE PPE
198

United Kingdom PPE

1

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Latvia PPE

2

Belgium PPE

4

Cyprus PPE

1

Ireland PPE

Against (1)

3
icon: S&D S&D
172
4

Czechia S&D

Against (1)

4

Lithuania S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3
4

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ECR ECR
68

Romania ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
2

Netherlands ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
60

Germany ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
35

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
19

Germany NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark NI

Against (1)

1

NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ENF ENF
29

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

For (1)

4
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3
5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
41

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

3
AmendmentsDossier
4 2018/0091(NLE)
2018/09/13 ENVI 1 amendments...
source: 627.601
2018/10/08 INTA 3 amendments...
source: 628.611

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/2/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.597
docs/3/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE628.611
docs/4/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE625.210&secondRef=03
events/2/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/3/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0366_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0366_EN.html
events/5/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20181211&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/7
date
2018-12-12T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0504_EN.html title: T8-0504/2018
summary
events/7
date
2018-12-12T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0504_EN.html title: T8-0504/2018
summary
events/0
date
2018-04-18T00:00:00
type
Preparatory document
body
EP
docs
summary
events/0
date
2018-04-18T00:00:00
type
Initial legislative proposal published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0366&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0366_EN.html
events/6
date
2018-12-12T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0504 title: T8-0504/2018
summary
events/6
date
2018-12-12T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=31783&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/7
date
2018-12-12T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0504 title: T8-0504/2018
summary
events/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0504
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0504_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: SILVA PEREIRA Pedro date: 2018-05-16T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2018-05-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SILVA PEREIRA Pedro group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
rapporteur
name: VĂLEAN Adina-Ioana date: 2018-10-17T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2018-10-17T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: VĂLEAN Adina-Ioana group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
rapporteur
name: SIEKIERSKI Czesław Adam date: 2018-07-10T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
date
2018-07-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SIEKIERSKI Czesław Adam group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
date
2018-07-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SIEKIERSKI Czesław Adam group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
date
2018-07-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SIEKIERSKI Czesław Adam group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
activities
  • date: 2018-04-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2018/0192/COM_COM(2018)0192_EN.pdf title: COM(2018)0192 type: Initial legislative proposal published celexid: CELEX:52018PC0192:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/trade_en title: Trade Commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia type: Initial legislative proposal published
  • date: 2018-06-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=7964%2F18&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Legislative proposal published title: 07964/2018 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/trade_en title: Trade Commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia type: Legislative proposal published
  • date: 2018-09-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2018-05-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: ENF name: MÉLIN Joëlle body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: WAŁĘSA Jarosław group: ECR name: KAMALL Syed group: ALDE name: HIRSCH Nadja group: GUE/NGL name: SCHOLZ Helmut group: Verts/ALE name: BUCHNER Klaus group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana responsible: True committee: INTA date: 2018-05-16T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: S&D name: SILVA PEREIRA Pedro body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2018-11-05T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2018-12-11T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Trade commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2018-05-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SILVA PEREIRA Pedro group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2018-10-17T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: VĂLEAN Adina-Ioana group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ENVI
date
2018-05-29T00:00:00
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
rapporteur
group: ENF name: MÉLIN Joëlle
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
INTA
date
2018-05-16T00:00:00
committee_full
International Trade
rapporteur
group: S&D name: SILVA PEREIRA Pedro
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
date
2018-07-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SIEKIERSKI Czesław Adam group: Group of European People's Party abbr: EPP
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Environment meeting_id: 3666 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3666*&MEET_DATE=20/12/2018 date: 2018-12-20T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2018-04-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2018/0193/COM_COM(2018)0193_EN.docx title: COM(2018)0193 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2018&nu_doc=0193 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2018-06-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=7965%2F18&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 07965/2018 type: Document attached to the procedure body: CSL
  • date: 2018-09-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.597 title: PE627.597 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2018-10-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE628.611 title: PE628.611 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2018-10-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE625.210&secondRef=03 title: PE625.210 committee: ENVI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2018-10-25T00:00:00 docs: title: PE628.551 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2018-09-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2018)0192 title: COM(2018)0192 type: Contribution body: PT_PARLIAMENT
events
  • date: 2018-04-18T00:00:00 type: Initial legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2018/0192/COM_COM(2018)0192_EN.pdf title: COM(2018)0192 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2018&nu_doc=0192 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to conclude the Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Japan. PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision. ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act. BACKGROUND: Japan is the world’s third largest economy outside of the EU in terms of GDP, yet only EU's seventh largest trading partner. It has a population of over 127 million inhabitants with a very high purchasing power. It is a key market for European Union exporters, services providers and investors. On 29 November 2012, the Council authorised the Commission to enter into negotiations for a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with Japan. The Free Trade Agreement with Japan was renamed the "Economic Partnership Agreement" (the EPA) at the time of the conclusion of an agreement in principle on 6 July 2017. On the basis of the negotiating directives adopted by the Council in 2012, the Commission has negotiated with Japan an ambitious and comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement with a view to creating new opportunities and legal certainty for trade and investment between both partners. The texts of the EPA after the finalisation of the negotiations were published in December 2017. CONTENT: the Commission called on the Council to adopt the Decision to conclude the Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Japan. In line with the objectives set by the negotiating directives, the Commission notably secured the following: Liberalisation of imports : Japan will liberalise 91% of its imports from the EU at entry into force of the Agreement. At the end of the staging period 99% of its imports from the EU will be liberalised, while the remaining imports (1%) will be partly liberalised through quotas and tariff reductions (in agriculture). In terms of tariff lines, Japan fully liberalises 86% of its tariff lines at entry into force, going up to 97% after 15 years. Major positive achievements for the EU include full liberalisation at entry into force for wines and sparkling wines, full liberalisation of other major agri-food exports (hard matured cheeses, pasta, chocolate, confectionery) over a transitional period; very significant concession achieving almost liberalisation for pigmeat over time; substantial improvement of market access conditions for EU exports of beef and all the other cheeses; as well as liberalisation of all European industrial exports, including old-standing priorities such as footwear and leather products. Public procurement : EU companies will be able to participate on an equal footing with Japanese companies in bids for procurement tenders in the 48 so-called 'core cities' of Japan with around 300.000 to 500.00 inhabitants. The agreement also removes existing obstacles to procurement in the railway sector. Removal of trade barriers : the removal of technical and regulatory trade barriers to trade is proposed in goods such as duplicative testing, in particular by promoting the use of technical and regulatory standards used in the EU in the sectors of motor vehicles, electronics, pharmaceuticals and medical devices as well as green technologies. Trade in services : the EPA includes a chapter on Trade in Services, Investment Liberalisation and Electronic Commerce and the related schedules of commitments, which go significantly beyond both parties' WTO commitments. The chapter includes cross-cutting rules on domestic regulation and mutual recognition, and sector-specific rules designed to ensure a level playing field for EU businesses. Corporate governance : for the first time in an EU trade agreement, there will be a specific chapter on corporate governance. It is based on the G20/OECD's Principles on Corporate Governance and reflects the EU's and Japan's best practices and rules in this area. Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) : the EPA sets out a high level protection of intellectual property rights, including with regard to the enforcement of these rights and including detailed provisions on copyright, providing for improved copyright protection. Geographical Indications (GIs) : it aims to ensure a high level of protection for EU GIs, with TRIPS Article 23 protection, for more than 200 foodstuffs and wines and spirits. Sustainable development : the EPA includes all the key elements of the EU approach on sustainable development and is in line with other recent EU trade agreements. It includes a comprehensive chapter on trade and sustainable development, which aims at ensuring that trade supports environmental protection and social development and promotes the sustainable management of forests and fisheries. The chapter also sets out how civil society will be involved in its implementation and monitoring. It also includes a commitment to implement the Paris Agreement on Climate Change as well as a dedicated review mechanism. SMEs : a specific chapter will enable smaller companies to benefit fully from the agreement, notably through increased transparency. Wine exports : the EPA also includes a comprehensive section on the mutual facilitation of wine exports with the approval of several oenological practices including priority additives of each side. Joint committee : the EPA establishes a Joint committee that has as its main task to supervise and facilitate the implementation and application of the Agreement. It shall be comprised of representatives of the EU and of Japan who will meet once a year or in urgent cases at the request of either side. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the EPA will have a financial impact on the EU budget on the side of the revenues . It will lead to an estimated loss of duties of EUR 970 million at the entry into force of the Agreement. After the EPA is fully implemented (after 15 years from its entry into force) the yearly loss of duties is estimated to reach EUR 2.084 billion. This estimation is based on a projection of the evolution of trade for the next 15 years without any agreement. On the other hand, the EPA is not expected to have a financial impact on the EU budget on the side of the expenditures.
  • date: 2018-06-29T00:00:00 type: Legislative proposal published body: EC docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=7964%2F18&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 07964/2018 summary: PURPOSE: conclusion of the economic partnership agreement between the European Union and Japan. PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision. ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act. BACKGROUND: the agreement between the European Union and Japan on an economic partnership (EPA) has been signed and the agreement must now be approved. CONTENT: the draft Council decision seeks approval of the agreement between the European Union and Japan on an economic partnership . The objectives of the agreement are to liberalise and facilitate trade and investment and to promote closer economic relations between the Parties. The EU-Japan free trade agreement will create an open trade zone covering 600 million people and representing nearly a third of the world's GDP. When fully implemented, the agreement: remove 99% of tariffs applied to EU exports to Japan and also remove several regulatory barriers; create significant new opportunities for EU agricultural exports by removing existing Japanese tariffs on products such as cheese or wines, while protecting EU intellectual property rights on Japanese markets; shall also open up services markets and significantly increase EU companies' access to Japanese public procurement markets. The EPA is based on the highest standards of labour, safety, environment and consumer protection. In order to ensure an efficient operation of the wine export facilitation system provided for in the Agreement, the Commission shall be authorised to temporarily suspend, on behalf of the Union and as provided for in the Agreement, the acceptance of self-certification of wine products as set out in the Agreement. The Commission should also be authorised to terminate that temporary suspension on behalf of the Union. The Commission shall also be empowered to terminate this temporary suspension on behalf of the Union. The Commission shall also be empowered by the Council to approve, on behalf of the Union, certain modifications to the Agreement. For further details on the results of the negotiations, see also the summary of the Commission's original legislative proposal dated 18.4.2018.
  • date: 2018-09-10T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2018-11-05T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2018-11-09T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0366&language=EN title: A8-0366/2018 summary: The Committee on International Trade adopted the report by Pedro SILVA PEREIRA (S&D, PT) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Japan on an economic partnership. The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament give its approval to the conclusion of the agreement. As indicated in the explanatory memorandum accompanying the recommendation, the negotiations between the European Union and Japan on an Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA), which began on 25 March 2013, were concluded on 8 December 2017. On 17 July 2018, on the occasion of the EU-Japan Summit in Tokyo, the EU and Japan signed the EPA and the Strategic Partnership Agreement. The European Parliament set out its negotiating priorities in its October 2012 resolution . The outcome of the negotiations reflects these priorities. Parliament was kept informed throughout the process and the Committee on International Trade closely followed the negotiations, from their preparation to the signing of the final agreement. The EU-Japan EPA is of strategic importance. It is the most important bilateral trade agreement the EU has ever concluded: it covers almost a third of world GDP, almost 40% of international trade and affects more than 600 million people. Japan is the world's third largest consumer market, but only the EU's sixth largest trading partner. This agreement will strengthen the current bilateral trade and political relationship. The rapporteur considers that the agreement reached is balanced and comprehensive, and is of great economic value to the EU, its citizens and its businesses: it opens up new trade opportunities, in particular for sectors which, like agriculture, are not generally the main beneficiaries of trade agreements; once the agreement is fully implemented, Japan will have removed tariffs on 97% of goods from the EU; it includes many new features such as the commitment to the Paris Agreement on Climate Change, and chapters on corporate governance and SMEs; it fully respects regulatory law and protects public services. This agreement has the potential to contribute to generating sustainable growth and decent jobs while promoting the EU's values and maintaining high standards in areas such as food safety, environmental protection and workers' rights.
  • date: 2018-12-11T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20181211&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2018-12-12T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0504 title: T8-0504/2018 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 474 votes to 152, with 40 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Japan on an economic partnership. Parliament gave its consent to the conclusion of the agreement. The negotiations between the European Union and Japan on an Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA), which began on 25 March 2013, were concluded on 8 December 2017. On 17 July 2018, on the occasion of the EU-Japan Summit in Tokyo, the EU and Japan signed the EPA and the Strategic Partnership Agreement. The objectives of the agreement are to liberalise and facilitate trade and investment and to promote closer economic relations between the Parties.
  • date: 2018-12-20T00:00:00 type: Act adopted by Council after consultation of Parliament body: EP/CSL
  • date: 2018-12-20T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2018-12-27T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to approve the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership. NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT: Council Decision (EU) 2018/1907 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership. CONTENT: the Council approved the Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership. The EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) was signed on 17 July 2018. The objectives of the agreement are to liberalise and facilitate trade and investment and to promote closer economic relations between the Parties. The EPA is a comprehensive and ambitious trade agreement which, when fully implemented, will remove 99% of EU tariff lines and 97% of Japanese tariff lines. The agreement will create new opportunities for EU agricultural exports by removing existing Japanese tariffs on products such as cheese or wine, while protecting EU intellectual property rights on Japanese markets. It will also open up services markets and significantly increase EU companies' access to Japanese public procurement markets. The EPA is based on the highest standards of labour, safety, environment and consumer protection. It includes a specific commitment to the Paris Agreement on Climate Change and the chapters on corporate governance and SMEs. It fully respects regulatory law and protects public services. In order to ensure an efficient operation of the wine export facilitation system provided for in the Agreement, the Commission should be authorised to temporarily suspend the acceptance of self-certification of wine products as set out in the Agreement. The Commission should also be authorised to terminate that temporary suspension on behalf of the Union; Modifications of Annex 14-A and Annex 14-B to the Agreement through decisions of the Joint Committee established by the Agreement, following recommendations of the Committee on Intellectual Property established by the Agreement, shall be approved by the Commission on behalf of the Union. Where interested parties cannot reach an agreement following objections relating to a geographical indication, the Commission shall adopt a position on the basis of the procedure laid down in Article 57(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality systems for agricultural products and foodstuffs. ENTRY INTO FORCE: 20.12.2018. docs: title: Decision 2018/1907 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32018D1907 title: OJ L 330 27.12.2018, p. 0001 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2018:330:TOC
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/trade_en title: Trade commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
INTA/8/12821
New
  • INTA/8/12821
procedure/final
title
Decision 2018/1907
url
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32018D1907
procedure/instrument
Decision
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Procedure completed
procedure/subject
Old
  • 6.20.03 Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations
New
6.20.03
Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations
procedure/summary
  • Accompanying procedure
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: to conclude the Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Japan.

    PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.

    ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act.

    BACKGROUND: Japan is the world’s third largest economy outside of the EU in terms of GDP, yet only EU's seventh largest trading partner. It has a population of over 127 million inhabitants with a very high purchasing power. It is a key market for European Union exporters, services providers and investors.

    On 29 November 2012, the Council authorised the Commission to enter into negotiations for a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with Japan. The Free Trade Agreement with Japan was renamed the "Economic Partnership Agreement" (the EPA) at the time of the conclusion of an agreement in principle on 6 July 2017.

    On the basis of the negotiating directives adopted by the Council in 2012, the Commission has negotiated with Japan an ambitious and comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement with a view to creating new opportunities and legal certainty for trade and investment between both partners. The texts of the EPA after the finalisation of the negotiations were published in December 2017. 

    CONTENT: the Commission called on the Council to adopt the Decision to conclude the Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Japan.

    In line with the objectives set by the negotiating directives, the Commission notably secured the following:

    • Liberalisation of imports: Japan will liberalise 91% of its imports from the EU at entry into force of the Agreement. At the end of the staging period 99% of its imports from the EU will be liberalised, while the remaining imports (1%) will be partly liberalised through quotas and tariff reductions (in agriculture). In terms of tariff lines, Japan fully liberalises 86% of its tariff lines at entry into force, going up to 97% after 15 years. Major positive achievements for the EU include full liberalisation at entry into force for wines and sparkling wines, full liberalisation of other major agri-food exports (hard matured cheeses, pasta, chocolate, confectionery) over a transitional period; very significant concession achieving almost liberalisation for pigmeat over time; substantial improvement of market access conditions for EU exports of beef and all the other cheeses; as well as liberalisation of all European industrial exports, including old-standing priorities such as footwear and leather products.
    • Public procurement: EU companies will be able to participate on an equal footing with Japanese companies in bids for procurement tenders in the 48 so-called 'core cities' of Japan with around 300.000 to 500.00 inhabitants. The agreement also removes existing obstacles to procurement in the railway sector.
    • Removal of trade barriers: the removal of technical and regulatory trade barriers to trade is proposed in goods such as duplicative testing, in particular by promoting the use of technical and regulatory standards used in the EU in the sectors of motor vehicles, electronics, pharmaceuticals and medical devices as well as green technologies.
    • Trade in services: the EPA includes a chapter on Trade in Services, Investment Liberalisation and Electronic Commerce and the related schedules of commitments, which go significantly beyond both parties' WTO commitments. The chapter includes cross-cutting rules on domestic regulation and mutual recognition, and sector-specific rules designed to ensure a level playing field for EU businesses.
    • Corporate governance: for the first time in an EU trade agreement, there will be a specific chapter on corporate governance. It is based on the G20/OECD's Principles on Corporate Governance and reflects the EU's and Japan's best practices and rules in this area.
    • Intellectual Property Rights (IPR): the EPA sets out a high level protection of intellectual property rights, including with regard to the enforcement of these rights and including detailed provisions on copyright, providing for improved copyright protection.
    • Geographical Indications (GIs): it aims to ensure a high level of protection for EU GIs, with TRIPS Article 23 protection, for more than 200 foodstuffs and wines and spirits.
    • Sustainable development: the EPA includes all the key elements of the EU approach on sustainable development and is in line with other recent EU trade agreements. It includes a comprehensive chapter on trade and sustainable development, which aims at ensuring that trade supports environmental protection and social development and promotes the sustainable management of forests and fisheries. The chapter also sets out how civil society will be involved in its implementation and monitoring. It also includes a commitment to implement the Paris Agreement on Climate Change as well as a dedicated review mechanism.
    • SMEs: a specific chapter will enable smaller companies to benefit fully from the agreement, notably through increased transparency.
    • Wine exports: the EPA also includes a comprehensive section on the mutual facilitation of wine exports with the approval of several oenological practices including priority additives of each side.

    Joint committee: the EPA establishes a Joint committee that has as its main task to supervise and facilitate the implementation and application of the Agreement. It shall be comprised of representatives of the EU and of Japan who will meet once a year or in urgent cases at the request of either side.

    BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the EPA will have a financial impact on the EU budget on the side of the revenues. It will lead to an estimated loss of duties of EUR 970 million at the entry into force of the Agreement.

    After the EPA is fully implemented (after 15 years from its entry into force) the yearly loss of duties is estimated to reach EUR 2.084 billion. This estimation is based on a projection of the evolution of trade for the next 15 years without any agreement. On the other hand, the EPA is not expected to have a financial impact on the EU budget on the side of the expenditures.

activities/0/docs/0/type
Old
Legislative proposal published
New
Initial legislative proposal published
activities/0/type
Old
Legislative proposal published
New
Initial legislative proposal published
activities/1
date
2018-06-29T00:00:00
docs
url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=7964%2F18&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC type: Legislative proposal published title: 07964/2018
type
Legislative proposal published
body
EC
commission
DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/trade_en title: Trade Commissioner: MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
activities/2
date
2018-09-10T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/3
date
2018-11-05T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/4
date
2018-12-11T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0/committee
Old
ENVI
New
AGRI
committees/0/committee_full
Old
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
New
Agriculture and Rural Development
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ENVI
date
2018-05-29T00:00:00
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
rapporteur
group: ENF name: MÉLIN Joëlle
committees/2/date
2018-05-16T00:00:00
committees/2/rapporteur
  • group: S&D name: SILVA PEREIRA Pedro
committees/2/shadows
  • group: EPP name: WAŁĘSA Jarosław
  • group: ECR name: KAMALL Syed
  • group: ALDE name: HIRSCH Nadja
  • group: GUE/NGL name: SCHOLZ Helmut
  • group: Verts/ALE name: BUCHNER Klaus
  • group: EFD name: BEGHIN Tiziana
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
INTA/8/12821
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
procedure/summary
  • Accompanying procedure
activities/0/commission/0
DG
Commissioner
MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
MALMSTRÖM Cecilia
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52018PC0192:EN
activities
  • date: 2018-04-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2018/0192/COM_COM(2018)0192_EN.pdf type: Legislative proposal published title: COM(2018)0192 body: EC commission: type: Legislative proposal published
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
links
other
    procedure
    geographical_area
    Japan
    reference
    2018/0091(NLE)
    title
    EU/Japan Economic Partnership Agreement
    legal_basis
    stage_reached
    Preparatory phase in Parliament
    subtype
    Consent by Parliament
    type
    NLE - Non-legislative enactments
    subject
    6.20.03 Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations