BETA


2018/2175(DEC) 2017 discharge: EU general budget, European Data Protection Supervisor

Progress: Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CONT KOHN Arndt (icon: S&D S&D) SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio (icon: PPE PPE), FITTO Raffaele (icon: ECR ECR), KLINZ Wolf (icon: ALDE ALDE), DE JONG Dennis (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), JÁVOR Benedek (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), VALLI Marco (icon: EFDD EFDD), JALKH Jean-François (icon: ENF ENF)
Committee Opinion AFET
Committee Opinion DEVE
Committee Opinion INTA
Committee Opinion BUDG
Committee Opinion ECON
Committee Opinion EMPL
Committee Opinion ENVI
Committee Opinion ITRE
Committee Opinion IMCO
Committee Opinion TRAN
Committee Opinion REGI
Committee Opinion AGRI
Committee Opinion PECH
Committee Opinion CULT
Committee Opinion JURI
Committee Opinion LIBE FRANZ Romeo (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Committee Opinion AFCO
Committee Opinion FEMM
Committee Opinion PETI
Lead committee dossier:

Events

2019/03/26
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2019/03/26
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The European Parliament decided by 508 votes to 126, with 2 abstentions, to grant discharge to the European Data Protection Supervisor discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2017.

Members welcomed the conclusion of the Court of Auditors, according to which the payments as a whole for the year ended on 31 December 2017 for administrative and other expenditure of the European Data Protection Supervisor were free from material error and that the examined supervisory and control systems for administrative and other expenditure were effective.

Budgetary and financial management

Parliament regretted, however, that according to the EDPS annual activity report only a single payment was examined in 2017 by the Court. It stated that even if the EDPS is not a decentralised Union agency and its budget represents a very small percentage of the Union budget, the legality and regularity of EDPS transactions should nevertheless be properly examined by the Court, as from 2018, as transparency is vital for the appropriate functioning of this Union body.

The Court should therefore issue separate annual activity reports on the annual accounts of this important Union body.

In 2017, the EDPS had a total allocated budget of EUR 11 324 735, which represented a 21.93 % increase compared to the 2016 budget, and that the budget implementation in terms of commitment appropriations for 2017 amounted to EUR 10 075 534.

The implementation rate continued decreasing from 94.66 % in 2015 and 91.93 % in 2016 to 89 % of the available appropriations in 2017. The budget implementation in terms of payment appropriations amounted to EUR 9 368 686.15, corresponding to 77 % of the available appropriations. The EDPS should step up its efforts and to define the budget estimates prudently.

The EDPS’s budget was strongly influenced by two major legislative changes (General Data Protection Regulation and the Directive for Data Protection in the Police and Justice Sectors). Most of the additional resources were allocated to the EDPS for the establishment of the secretariat of the newly created European Data Protection Board (EDPB).

Staff

Members welcomed the high proportion of women in management positions and the measures to ensure gender balance in the institution. Only 32 % of total staff were men. Measures to promote gender balance and equal opportunities should benefit all genders according to Members.

The 80 members of staff came from 16 different Member States in total. The EDPS is called on to strive for a proportionate representation of all Member States among the population of the staff. Parliament noted that the issue of ‘revolving doors’ has been dealt with in the Code of Conduct of the Members of the EDPS. It welcomed the fact that CVs and declarations of interests of the members of the EDPS are available on the institution’s website.

Brexit

Lastly, Members noted that the United Kingdom’s decision to withdraw from the European Union would not have any direct impact on the financial, human or structural organisation of the EDPS. They welcomed the decision of the EDPS to maintain all of its four British members of staff.

Documents
2019/03/26
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2019/02/28
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Details

The Committee on Budgetary Control adopted the report by Arndt KOHN (S&D, DE) calling on the European Parliament to grant discharge to the European Data Protection Supervisor discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2017.

Members welcomed the conclusion of the Court of Auditors, according to which the payments as a whole for the year ended on 31 December 2017 for administrative and other expenditure of the European Data Protection Supervisor were free from material error and that the examined supervisory and control systems for administrative and other expenditure were effective.

Budgetary and financial management

Members regretted, however, that according to the EDPS annual activity report only a single payment was examined in 2017 by the Court. They stated that even if the EDPS is not a decentralised Union agency and its budget represents a very small percentage of the Union budget, the legality and regularity of EDPS transactions should nevertheless be properly examined by the Court, as from 2018, as transparency is vital for the appropriate functioning of this Union body.

The Court should therefore issue separate annual activity reports on the annual accounts of this important Union body.

In 2017, the EDPS had a total allocated budget of EUR 11 324 735, which represented a 21.93 % increase compared to the 2016 budget, and that the budget implementation in terms of commitment appropriations for 2017 amounted to EUR 10 075 534.

The implementation rate continued decreasing from 94.66 % in 2015 and 91.93 % in 2016 to 89 % of the available appropriations in 2017. The budget implementation in terms of payment appropriations amounted to EUR 9 368 686.15, corresponding to 77 % of the available appropriations. The EDPS should step up its efforts and to define the budget estimates prudently.

The EDPS’s budget was strongly influenced by two major legislative changes (General Data Protection Regulation and the Directive for Data Protection in the Police and Justice Sectors). Most of the additional resources were allocated to the EDPS for the establishment of the secretariat of the newly created European Data Protection Board (EDPB).

Staff

Members welcomed the high proportion of women in management positions and the measures to ensure gender balance in the institution. Only 32 % of total staff were men. Measures to promote gender balance and equal opportunities should benefit all genders according to Members.

The 80 members of staff came from 16 different Member States in total. The EDPS is called on to strive for a proportionate representation of all Member States among the population of the staff.

Brexit

Lastly, Members noted that the United Kingdom’s decision to withdraw from the European Union would not have any direct impact on the financial, human or structural organisation of the EDPS. They welcomed the decision of the EDPS to maintain all of its four British members of staff.

Documents
2019/02/20
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2019/02/12
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2019/02/11
   CSL - Supplementary non-legislative basic document
Details

Based on the observations contained in the report by the Court of Auditors, the Council called on the European Parliament to grant discharge to all of the EU institutions in respect of the implementation of their respective budgets for the financial year 2017.

However, it considered that budget implementation required a series of comments from the Council which should be fully taken into account by the Commission.

The Council welcomed the fact that the administrative and related expenditure of the EU institutions remained, as in previous years, free from material error with an estimated level of error of 0.5 %, which while being well below the materiality threshold is higher by 0.3 % compared to the Court's findings for 2016 (0.2 %). It noted with satisfaction that no serious weaknesses were identified by the Court in the supervisory and control systems and in the examined annual activity reports.

The Council took note that, as in previous years, there was a small number of errors relating to staff costs and some weaknesses in the Office for Administration and Payment of individual entitlements' (PMO) management of family allowances. It called on the Commission to improve its procedures to avoid errors related to staff expenditure.

The Court did not identify any specific problems concerning the European Data Protection Supervisor.

Documents
2019/01/17
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/12/13
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2018/10/18
   EP - Committee Opinion
2018/09/11
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2018/07/27
   EP - Responsible Committee
2018/07/12
   CofA - Court of Auditors: opinion, report
Details

PURPOSE: presentation of the Annual report of the Court of Auditors on the implementation of the budget concerning the financial year 2017.

CONTENT: the Court of Auditors published its 41th annual report on the implementation of the general budget of the Union for the year 2017. This report follows a five-part structure:

- the statement of assurance (DAS) and a summary of the results of the audit on the reliability of accounts and the regularity of transactions;

- the analysis of budgetary and financial management;

- the Commission’s performance reporting framework;

- the findings on EU revenue;

- the presentation of the main headings of the current multiannual financial framework (MFF), the results of the testing of the regularity of transactions.

The Court concludes that payments for 2017 are legal and regular, with the expenditure recorded in 2017 covering spending on a reimbursement basis. It believes that the EU accounts present a true and fair view of the EU’s financial position.

The report also assessed the potential impact on the 2017 accounts of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union. On 29 March 2017, the United Kingdom (UK) formally notified the European Council of its intention to leave the European Union (EU). On 22 May 2017, the negotiations started for the withdrawal agreement between the EU and the UK.

Part Five (Financial Provisions) of the draft withdrawal agreement of 19 March 2018 concerning the financial settlement states that the UK will pay all its obligations under the current and previous Multiannual Financial Frameworks as if it were still a Member State.

Based on this, the Court concluded that the accounts as at 31 December 2017 correctly reflect the withdrawal process.

The audit also focuses on the budget implementation of the European Data Protection Supervisor .

The overall audit evidence indicates that the level of error in spending on ‘Administration’ was not material. For this MFF heading, the testing of transactions produced an estimated overall level of error of 0.5 %

The Court did not detect any specific problem regarding the European Data Protection Supervisor.

2018/06/28
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2017, as part of the 2017 discharge procedure.

Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: European Data Protection Supervisor.

CONTENT: the organisational governance of the EU consists of institutions, agencies and other EU bodies whose expenditure is included in the general budget of the Union.

This Commission document concerns the EU's consolidated accounts for the year 2017 and details how spending by the EU institutions and bodies was carried out. The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective.

It is the responsibility of the Commission's Accounting Officer to prepare the EU's consolidated annual accounts and ensure that they present fairly, in all material aspects, the financial position, the result of the operations and the cash flows of the EU institutions and bodies with a view to granting discharge.

Discharge procedure : the final step of a budget lifecycle is the discharge . It is the decision by which the European Parliament ‘ releases ’ the Commission from its responsibility for management of a given budget by marking the end of that budget's existence. It is granted by the European Parliament on the recommendation of the Council.

The decision is based in particular on the European Court of Auditors reports, in particular its annual report, in which the Court provides a Statement of Assurance (DAS) on the legality and regularity of transactions (payments and commitments).

The procedure results in the granting, postponement or refusal of discharge.

The final discharge report including specific recommendations to the Commission for action is adopted in plenary by the European Parliament and are subject to an annual follow up report in which the Commission outlines the concrete actions it has taken to implement the recommendations made.

All EU institutions and other agencies, bodies and joint undertakings are subject to their own discharge procedures.

(2) Implementation of the EDPS’s appropriations for the financial year 2017 : the EDPS was allocated a budget of EUR 11 324 735. This represents an increase of 20.9% compared to the 2016 budget. The 2017 budget was heavily influenced by two major legislative changes, the new General Data Protection Regulation ( GDPR ) and the Europol Regulation, both of which require increased human and financial resources.

As regards the budget implementation of the EDPS, the Annual Report 2017 stated that the 2017 was characterised by the following:

preparing for the new legislative framework: General Data Protection Regulation which shall apply from 25 May 2018 ; dealing with its new supervisory role with Europol in carrying out various supervision tasks, including complaint handling, consultations, requests for information, inquiries and inspections. The aim being to ensure that Europol strikes the right balance between security and privacy when processing data for the purpose of law enforcement; the launch of the Digital Clearinghouse . A project which aims to bring together agencies from the areas of competition and consumer and data protection who are willing to share information and discuss how to enforce rules that support the interests of the individual in the digital space.

Documents

Votes

A8-0116/2019 - Arndt Kohn - Résolution 26/03/2019 17:42:28.000

2019/03/26 Outcome: +: 508, -: 126, 0: 2
DE ES IT FR PT RO AT NL SE BG HU BE FI LT SI IE HR SK CZ LU EE MT LV DK EL PL CY GB
Total
89
47
65
61
21
19
17
25
18
17
13
20
12
8
8
7
9
13
18
6
6
6
7
10
8
46
1
59
icon: PPE PPE
181
3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Greece PPE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
157

Netherlands S&D

3

Lithuania S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
39

Italy GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
36

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Italy NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: ENF ENF
32

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
65
4

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Belgium ECR

3

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0116/2019 - Arndt Kohn - Résolution

2019/03/26 Outcome: +: 508, -: 126, 0: 2
DE ES IT FR PT RO AT NL SE BG HU BE FI LT SI IE HR SK CZ LU EE MT LV DK EL PL CY GB
Total
89
47
65
61
21
19
17
25
18
17
13
20
12
8
8
7
9
13
18
6
6
6
7
10
8
46
1
59
icon: PPE PPE
181
3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Greece PPE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
157

Netherlands S&D

3

Lithuania S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
39

Italy GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
36

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

Italy NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: ENF ENF
32

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

2
icon: ECR ECR
65
4

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Sweden ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Belgium ECR

3

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
11 2018/2175(DEC)
2018/12/06 LIBE 4 amendments...
source: 631.957
2019/02/12 CONT 7 amendments...
source: 634.537

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

activities
  • date
    2018-06-28T00:00:00
    docs
    • url
      http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2018/0521/COM_COM(2018)0521_EN.pdf
      title
      COM(2018)0521
      type
      Non-legislative basic document published
      celexid
      CELEX:52018DC0521:EN
    body
    EC
    commission
    • DG
      Commissioner
      OETTINGER Günther
    type
    Non-legislative basic document published
  • date
    2018-09-11T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    committees
commission
  • body
    EC
    dg
    Budget
    commissioner
    OETTINGER Günther
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
  • 2018-07-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
  • name
    KOHN Arndt
    group
    Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats
    abbr
    S&D
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
CONT
date
2018-07-27T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgetary Control
rapporteur
  • group
    S&D
    name
    KOHN Arndt
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
committees/7
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
committees/8
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/8
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/9
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/9
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
committees/10
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
opinion
False
committees/10
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
committees/11
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
opinion
False
committees/11
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/12
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
opinion
False
committees/12
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
committees/13
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
opinion
False
committees/13
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/14
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
opinion
False
committees/14
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
committees/15
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/15
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
committees/16
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
  • 2018-10-18T00:00:00
rapporteur
  • name
    FRANZ Romeo
    group
    Greens/European Free Alliance
    abbr
    Verts/ALE
committees/16
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
committees/17
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
opinion
False
committees/17
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
committees/18
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Womens Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
opinion
False
committees/18
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
committees/19
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
opinion
False
committees/19
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
docs
  • date
    2018-07-12T00:00:00
    docs
    summary
    type
    Court of Auditors: opinion, report
    body
    CofA
  • date
    2018-12-13T00:00:00
    docs
    • url
      http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE626.824
      title
      PE626.824
    type
    Committee draft report
    body
    EP
  • date
    2019-01-17T00:00:00
    docs
    • url
      http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE630.605&secondRef=02
      title
      PE630.605
    committee
    LIBE
    type
    Committee opinion
    body
    EP
  • date
    2019-02-11T00:00:00
    docs
    • url
      http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=5824%2F19&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC
      title
      05824/2019
    summary
    type
    Supplementary non-legislative basic document
    body
    CSL
  • date
    2019-02-12T00:00:00
    docs
    • url
      http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE634.537
      title
      PE634.537
    type
    Amendments tabled in committee
    body
    EP
events
  • date
    2018-06-28T00:00:00
    type
    Non-legislative basic document published
    body
    EC
    docs
    summary
  • date
    2018-09-11T00:00:00
    type
    Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    body
    EP
  • date
    2019-02-20T00:00:00
    type
    Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    body
    EP
  • date
    2019-02-28T00:00:00
    type
    Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    body
    EP
    docs
    • url
      http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2019-0116&language=EN
      title
      A8-0116/2019
    summary
  • date
    2019-03-26T00:00:00
    type
    Debate in Parliament
    body
    EP
    docs
    • url
      http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190326&type=CRE
      title
      Debate in Parliament
  • date
    2019-03-26T00:00:00
    type
    Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    body
    EP
    docs
    • url
      http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0253
      title
      T8-0253/2019
    summary
  • date
    2019-03-26T00:00:00
    type
    End of procedure in Parliament
    body
    EP
links
other
  • body
    EC
    dg
    commissioner
    OETTINGER Günther
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CONT/8/14243
New
  • CONT/8/14243
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.70.03.02 2017 discharge
New
8.70.03.02
2017 discharge
activities/0/commission/0
DG
Commissioner
OETTINGER Günther
activities/1
date
2018-09-11T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
OETTINGER Günther
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
CONT/8/14243
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
committees/4/date
2018-07-27T00:00:00
committees/4/rapporteur
  • group
    S&D
    name
    KOHN Arndt
committees/4/shadows
  • group
    EPP
    name
    SALAFRANCA SÁNCHEZ-NEYRA José Ignacio
  • group
    ALDE
    name
    KLINZ Wolf
  • group
    GUE/NGL
    name
    DE JONG Dennis
  • group
    Verts/ALE
    name
    JÁVOR Benedek
  • group
    EFD
    name
    VALLI Marco
  • group
    ENF
    name
    JALKH Jean-François
activities
  • date
    2018-06-28T00:00:00
    docs
    • url
      http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2018/0521/COM_COM(2018)0521_EN.pdf
      title
      COM(2018)0521
      type
      Non-legislative basic document published
      celexid
      CELEX:52018DC0521:EN
    body
    EC
    type
    Non-legislative basic document published
    commission
    committees
    • body
      EP
      responsible
      False
      committee_full
      Constitutional Affairs
      committee
      AFCO
    • body
      EP
      responsible
      False
      committee_full
      Foreign Affairs
      committee
      AFET
    • body
      EP
      responsible
      False
      committee_full
      Agriculture and Rural Development
      committee
      AGRI
    • body
      EP
      responsible
      False
      committee_full
      Budgets
      committee
      BUDG
    • body
      EP
      responsible
      True
      committee_full
      Budgetary Control
      committee
      CONT
    • body
      EP
      responsible
      False
      committee_full
      Culture and Education
      committee
      CULT
    • body
      EP
      responsible
      False
      committee_full
      Development
      committee
      DEVE
    • body
      EP
      responsible
      False
      committee_full
      Economic and Monetary Affairs
      committee
      ECON
    • body
      EP
      responsible
      False
      committee_full
      Employment and Social Affairs
      committee
      EMPL
    • body
      EP
      responsible
      False
      committee_full
      Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
      committee
      ENVI
    • body
      EP
      responsible
      False
      committee_full
      Women’s Rights and Gender Equality
      committee
      FEMM
    • body
      EP
      responsible
      False
      committee_full
      Internal Market and Consumer Protection
      committee
      IMCO
    • body
      EP
      responsible
      False
      committee_full
      International Trade
      committee
      INTA
    • body
      EP
      responsible
      False
      committee_full
      Industry, Research and Energy
      committee
      ITRE
    • body
      EP
      responsible
      False
      committee_full
      Legal Affairs
      committee
      JURI
    • body
      EP
      responsible
      False
      committee_full
      Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
      committee
      LIBE
    • body
      EP
      responsible
      False
      committee_full
      Fisheries
      committee
      PECH
    • body
      EP
      responsible
      False
      committee_full
      Petitions
      committee
      PETI
    • body
      EP
      responsible
      False
      committee_full
      Regional Development
      committee
      REGI
    • body
      EP
      responsible
      False
      committee_full
      Transport and Tourism
      committee
      TRAN
    links
    other
      procedure
      stage_reached
      Preparatory phase in Parliament
      subject
      • 8.70.03.02 2017 discharge
      type
      DEC - Discharge procedure
      reference
      2018/2175(DEC)
      title
      2017 discharge: EU general budget, European Data Protection Supervisor