2019/2028(BUD) 2020 general budget: all sections
Next event: Committee Opinion 2019/09/03
Next event: Committee Opinion 2019/09/03
Progress: Preparatory phase in Parliament
Subjects
Events
2019/09/03
EP - Committee Opinion
2019/07/24
EP - Committee Opinion
2019/07/24
EP - Committee Opinion
2019/07/24
EP - Committee Opinion
2019/07/23
EP - Committee Opinion
2019/07/23
EP - Committee Opinion
2019/07/18
EP - Committee Opinion
2019/07/18
EP - Committee Opinion
2019/07/18
EP - Committee Opinion
2019/07/17
EP - Committee Opinion
2019/07/16
EP - Committee Opinion
2019/07/16
EP - Committee Opinion
2019/07/15
EP - Committee Opinion
2019/07/15
EP - Committee Opinion
2019/07/10
EP - Committee Opinion
2019/07/09
EP - Committee Opinion
2019/07/05
EC - Commission draft budget
Documents
2019/07/05
EC - Commission draft budget published
Documents
Documents
- Commission draft budget: COM(2019)0400
- Commission draft budget: EUR-Lex
- Commission draft budget published: COM(2019)0400
- Commission draft budget published: EUR-Lex
- Commission draft budget: COM(2019)0400 EUR-Lex
Activities
- Annunziata Mary REES-MOGG
Plenary Speeches (3)
- Martin Edward DAUBNEY
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Jonathan BULLOCK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Matt CARTHY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- John HOWARTH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rory PALMER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Adina-Ioana VĂLEAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Robert ROWLAND
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Henrik OVERGAARD NIELSEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rupert LOWE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Antonio TAJANI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Clara AGUILERA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Pascal CANFIN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Caterina CHINNICI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Lefteris CHRISTOFOROU
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Corina CREȚU
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Ryszard CZARNECKI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Paolo DE CASTRO
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Tamás DEUTSCH
Plenary Speeches (0)
- José Manuel FERNANDES
Plenary Speeches (0)
- João FERREIRA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Eider GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Maria GRAPINI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Krzysztof HETMAN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Monika HOHLMEIER
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Petra KAMMEREVERT
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Elsi KATAINEN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Seán KELLY
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Georgios KYRTSOS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Zbigniew KUŹMIUK
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Gilles LEBRETON
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Janusz LEWANDOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Peter LUNDGREN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Costas MAVRIDES
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Cláudia MONTEIRO DE AGUIAR
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Siegfried MUREŞAN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Andrey NOVAKOV
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Jan OLBRYCHT
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Dimitrios PAPADIMOULIS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Jiří POSPÍŠIL
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Petri SARVAMAA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- David Maria SASSOLI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Pedro SILVA PEREIRA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Michaela ŠOJDROVÁ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Maria SPYRAKI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Waldemar TOMASZEWSKI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Nils TORVALDS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Evžen TOŠENOVSKÝ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Monika VANA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Kathleen VAN BREMPT
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Johan VAN OVERTVELDT
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Rainer WIELAND
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Jan ZAHRADIL
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Tatjana ŽDANOKA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Rasmus ANDRESEN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Marc BOTENGA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Olivier CHASTEL
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Gwendoline DELBOS-CORFIELD
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Nicolaus FEST
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Claudia GAMON
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Luis GARICANO
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Alexandra GEESE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Adam JARUBAS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Maximilian KRAH
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Joachim KUHS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Pierre LARROUTUROU
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Hermann TERTSCH
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Milan UHRÍK
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Nikolaj VILLUMSEN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Veronika VRECIONOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Mick WALLACE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Charlie WEIMERS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Clotilde ARMAND
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Valérie HAYER
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Billy KELLEHER
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Margarida MARQUES
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Moritz KÖRNER
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Lucia ĎURIŠ NICHOLSONOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Daniel FREUND
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Erik BERGKVIST
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Karlo RESSLER
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Tudor CIUHODARU
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Mario FURORE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Frances FITZGERALD
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Svenja HAHN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Damian BOESELAGER
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Bogdan RZOŃCA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Robert BIEDROŃ
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Hélène LAPORTE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Tomislav SOKOL
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Gianantonio DA RE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Katarina BARLEY
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Ivan DAVID
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Klára DOBREV
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Elisabetta GUALMINI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Niclas HERBST
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Angelika WINZIG
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Filip DE MAN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Jessica STEGRUD
Plenary Speeches (0)
Amendments | Dossier |
56 |
2019/2028(BUD)
2019/07/24
ENVI
27 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that 21,0 % of the total commitments in the draft budget for 2020 (2020 DB) are climate-related; regrets that the Union budget trend would deliver only 19,7 % for the current multiannual financial framework (MFF) period;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Believes that in particular in the last year of the MFF an ambitious budget in climate action related programmes and for the protection of biodiversity is needed to build a bridge to the forthcoming MFF which it is anticipated will have a slow start until all new programmes are fully operational;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that sufficient resources should be allocated in the budget to
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Furthermore, in the context of the Political Guidelines for the Next European Commission launched by the Commission President-elect, there is an absolute urgency to accelerate emissions reduction, and therefore it is necessary to amend the 2020 budget by enhancing those programmes aimed at supporting the switch from coal to gas in energy production;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. In line with the Agenda 2030 and the commitments acquired by the Union and its Member States within the General Assembly of the United Nations, underlines the need to ensure sufficient resources in the 2020 budget for the achievement of the sustainable development goals;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes the increase of EUR 21,5 million in commitments for LIFE (+3,9 %); is convinced that the LIFE budget 2020 is insufficient (€ 294,9 million); calls for significant increases for 2020 in order to be prepared and in line with Parliament’s demands to double the LIFE programme during the post-2020 MFF; deeply regrets that LIFE represents only 0,3 % of the 2020 DB;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes the increase of EUR 21,5 million in commitments for LIFE (+3,9 %);
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Welcomes that the new rescEU programme will receive €156,2 million in order to help it better tackle earthquakes, wildfire, forest fires and other natural disasters; stresses the need for instruments such as the Civil Protection Mechanism and the Solidarity Fund to cover environmental catastrophes and valorise the damage to the environment;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Underlines that adequate resources should be allocated in the budget to elaborate and implement the future European Plan to fight against cancer; stresses that this plan is essential to promote and improve prevention, research, access to innovation and reintegration;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that 21,0 % of the total commitments in the draft budget for 2020 (2020 DB) are climate-related; regrets that the Union budget trend would deliver only 19,7 % for the current multiannual financial framework (MFF) period while the objective agreed upon before 2014 said ‘‘at least 20%’’ over the 2014-2020 period; highlights that, according to the Commission, an additional € 3,5 billion in climate-related spending will be needed in the budget 2020 in order to reach the 20 % target; stresses that every effort should be made to ensure that the overall EU budget target will be reached by the end of 2020; reiterates its call to have more ambitious climate mainstreaming in the next MFF period, to be set at least at 50 %, and to its alignment with the Paris agreement;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Notes that permanent and temporary posts authorised under the 2020 DB remain unchanged compared to the 2019 budget for the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), while those posts increase for the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (+34, following revision of the general food law ), the European Environment Agency (EEA) (+1 ) and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (+2 ); highlights that,
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Notes that permanent and temporary posts authorised under the 2020 DB remain unchanged compared to the 2019 budget for the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Notes that permanent and temporary posts authorised under the 2020 DB remain unchanged compared to the 2019 budget for the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), while those posts increase for the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (+34, following revision of the general food law ), the European Environment Agency (EEA) (+1 ) and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (+2 ); highlights that, where appropriate, more financial and human resources must be allocated to those agencies in order to fulfil their mandate and execute their tasks resulting from recently adopted legislation, and in order to promote a science-based approach in the Union; underlines that better coordination between the agencies would optimise their work, as well as the
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Notes that permanent and temporary posts authorised under the 2020 DB remain unchanged compared to the 2019 budget for the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), while those posts increase for the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (+34, following revision of the general food law ), the European Environment Agency (EEA) (+1 ) and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (+2 ); highlights that, where appropriate, more financial and human resources must be allocated to those agencies in order to ensure their independence, in order to fulfil their mandate and execute their tasks, and in order to promote a science-based approach in the Union; underlines that better coordination between the agencies would optimise their work, as well as the use of public funds;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Notes that permanent and temporary posts authorised under the 2020 DB remain unchanged compared to the 2019 budget for the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), while those posts increase for the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (+34, following revision of the general food law ), the European Environment Agency (EEA) (+1 ) and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (+2 ); highlights that, where appropriate, more financial and human resources must be allocated to those agencies in order to fulfil their mandate and execute their tasks, to banish past malpractices, such as the ghost-writing of reports by private lobbies, and in order to promote a science-based approach in the Union; underlines that better coordination between the agencies would optimise their work, as well as the use of public funds;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Calls on the Commission to swiftly implement pilot projects and preparatory actions (PP-PAs), in particular all PP-PAs that concern public health or aim at improving the well-being of European citizens;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Recalls that PP-PAs should receive adequate funding throughout their life cycle, so that they can achieve their full potential and prepare the ground for the adoption of future measures.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that 21,0 % of the total commitments in the draft budget for 2020 (2020 DB) are climate-related; regrets that the Union budget trend would deliver only 19,7 % for the current multiannual financial framework
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that 21,0 % of the total commitments in the draft budget for 2020 (2020 DB) are climate-related; regrets that
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that 21,0 % of the total commitments in the draft budget for 2020 (2020 DB) are climate-related; regrets that the Union budget trend would deliver only 19,7 % for the current multiannual financial framework (MFF) period; stresses that every effort should be made to ensure that the overall EU budget target will be reached by the end of 2020; reiterates its call to have more ambitious climate mainstreaming in the next MFF period and to its alignment with the Paris agreement; insists that the next MFF should rely on robust methodology, set up in line with internationally established methodologies, in order to track climate action fundingand to avoid the risk of overestimation of climate action; believes that green budgeting of the next MFF is key to achieve our climate objectives;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that 21,0 % of the total commitments in the draft budget for 2020 (2020 DB) are climate-related;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that 8,3 % of total commitments are related to reversing the decline in biodiversity; calls for sufficient and traceable resources to be allocated to ensure the long-term protection of biodiversity across the Union; insists that the next MFF should rely on a robust methodology, set up in line with internationally established methodologies, in order to track biodiversityand avoid the risk of overestimation of action towards biodiversity;
source: 639.804
2019/07/25
IMCO
29 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that the internal market remains one of the Union’s greatest and most tangible achievements, bringing benefits to businesses, consumers and citizens across Europe; further deepening the
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the importance of a robust and efficiently executed consumer policy that gives protection and predictability to consumers both offline and online, and confidence to businesses to provide their goods and services across the internal market;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the importance of a robust consumer policy that gives real protection and predictability to consumers both offline and online, and confidence to businesses to provide their goods and
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of appropriately financing the transition to a fully automated customs operation, in the interests of greater
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of appropriately financing the transition to a fully automated customs operation, in the interests of greater efficiency for European companies, of a fair competition and streamlined protection for consumers;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of appropriately financing the transition to a fully automated customs operation, in the interests of greater efficiency for European companies and streamlined protection for consumers; to this end, it is essential to increase the funding of the Customs 2020 programme which contains cooperation mechanisms that allow customs authorities and officers across the union to exchange and share information and best practices and to ensure funding for purchase and maintenance of up-to date, efficient Customs control equipment;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses the importance of a budget increase on information and communication technologies to complete the Digital Single Market in order to boost Europe's competitiveness;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses the importance of single market for services; calls on the EU to commit additional funding to the completion of the internal market in services and encourage the development of new and innovative services;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls for the 2020 budget to contribute to the fulfilment of the priorities outlined in the European Semester, specifically, to deliver high- quality investment and reforms that increase competitiveness and the productivity of businesses, including small and micro businesses, and to continue to deepen the Single Market and further develop the Digital Single Market;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the fact that in its Draft Budget the Commission has allocated an appropriate budget to most of IMCO’s main priorities
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the increase in appropriations for “operation and development of the internal market of goods and services” (budget line 02 03 01), for the purpose of market surveillance and the establishment of the EU Product Compliance Network, as well as for “improving access to finance for SMEs” (budget line 02 02 02), and for “support expenditure for COSME” (budget line 02 01 04 01),
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that the internal market remains one of the Union’s greatest and most tangible achievements, bringing benefits to businesses, consumers and citizens across Europe; further deepening the Single Market and developing the Digital Single Market should be prioritised in the 2020 Budget; in this context stresses that it is important to systematically monitor advances, detect emerging issues and provide policy recommendations for the further development of the Digital Single Market;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Stresses the importance of an ambitious approach of the EU budget on the business services sector which accounts for two-thirds of the total EU labour force;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Highlights in this respect that small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are an essential part of the Union economy and play a crucial role in job creation throughout the Union and sees the need to create and further promote an SME-friendly business environment; underlines therefore that improving SMEs’ access to finance remains a key priority for IMCO in the 2020 Budget;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Stresses that the Programme for Competitiveness of Enterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises (COSME) is a crucial tool for encouraging entrepreneurial culture, supporting existing SMEs and ensuring competitiveness, sustainability and growth; calls in particular for a strengthening of the European Innovation Council’s Accelerator (SME instrument) as it provides decisive support for SMEs with radically new ideas and marketable innovative solutions; considers that the Union budget and access to finance backed by it, is a key tool in making start-ups, microenterprises and SMEs more competitive, more innovative, and fosters the spirit of enterprise in the Union;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Reminds that the Commission and the Member States have already accumulated delays in the scheduled implementation of the Union Customs Code, and consequently strongly regrets the reduction in the budget appropriations for “supporting the functioning and modernisation of the customs union” (budget line 14 02 01), which could lead to further delays, and hamper the functioning of the internal market; recalls that the full and uniform implementation of the Code is essential to better protect citizens and the financial interests of the Union and e-customs constitutes a priority policy for the better functioning of the internal market;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Reminds that the Commission and the Member States have already accumulated delays in the scheduled
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Calls on the Commission to finance all pilot projects and preparatory actions endorsed by IMCO, including to the pilot project 'Web inclusiveness: access for all'.
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Stresses the importance of ensuring sufficient resources for the financing of and investment in micro and small businesses, and of transparent communication to EU consumers;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Proposes to introduce, systematically monitor and regularly evaluate the Value for Money principle with aim to improve efficiency of all European expenditures which will contribute to higher effectiveness and bigger added value for European consumers as has been reiterated also by the Court of Auditors on many occasions; the European Union shall emphasise this principle within the budgetary process and EU funds absorption;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Welcomes the support for research and innovation dedicated to the digitalisation of the Single Market and European businesses, particularly micro and small businesses; points out that it is essential to ensure appropriate financial support through the InvestEU programme and the Single Market programme and SMEs in order to stimulate innovation and the uptake of smart solutions, including in overcoming barriers to the Single Market;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 c (new) 10c. Recalls the need for the consumer protection system to be properly underpinned by proportionality and sustainability criteria for different business types, particularly with regard to the nature and structure of micro and small businesses;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that the internal market remains one of the Union’s greatest and most tangible achievements, bringing benefits to businesses, including micro and small businesses, and to consumers and citizens across Europe; further deepening the Single Market and developing the Digital Single Market should be prioritised in the 2020 Budget;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that the internal market remains one of the Union’s greatest and most tangible achievements, bringing benefits to businesses, consumers and citizens across Europe; further deepening the Single Market, reducing red tape that hampers the free movement of services, and developing the Digital Single Market should be prioritised in the 2020 Budget;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that the internal market remains one of the Union’s greatest and most tangible achievements with actual impact on economic growth in the Member States, bringing benefits to businesses, consumers and citizens across Europe; further deepening the Single Market and developing the Digital Single Market should be prioritised in the 2020 Budget;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines that household consumption accounts for 54.4% of EU GDP (in 2017), hence the importance of a robust consumer policy that gives protection and predictability to consumers both offline and online, and confidence to businesses to provide their goods and services across the internal market; stresses that consumer challenges remain, both in the digital and physical spheres, and therefore it is of utmost importance to increase the education and awareness of consumers and citizens;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the importance of a robust consumer policy that gives protection and predictability to consumers both offline and online,
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the importance of a robust consumer policy that
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines the importance of a robust consumer policy that gives protection and predictability to consumers both offline and online, and confidence to businesses to provide their goods and services across the internal market, while also keeping the bureaucratic burden for SMEs to a minimum;
source: 639.809
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
2019-07-26Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
committees/10 |
|
committees/10 |
|
2019-07-25Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
2019-07-24Show (8) Changes | Timetravel
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15 |
|
2019-07-20Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
2019-07-19Show (10) Changes | Timetravel
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17 |
|
2019-07-18Show (8) Changes | Timetravel
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/18 |
|
2019-07-14Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
committees/16 |
|
committees/16 |
|
2019-07-12Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
|
2019-07-12Show (6) Changes | Timetravel
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13 |
|
docs/0/docs/1 |
|
events/0/docs/1 |
|
2019-07-08Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs |
|
events |
|
2019-07-08Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
2019-07-06Show (3) Changes
commission |
|
committees |
|
procedure |
|