Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | LIBE | BOGDAN Ioan-Rareş ( EPP) | INCIR Evin ( S&D), IN 'T VELD Sophia ( Renew), RIBA I GINER Diana ( Verts/ALE), WIŚNIEWSKA Jadwiga ( ECR), PELLETIER Anne-Sophie ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | AFCO | VINCZE Loránt ( EPP) | Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR ( S&D), Markéta GREGOROVÁ ( Verts/ALE), Gilles BOYER ( RE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 122-p7, RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 122-p7, RoP 54Events
The European Parliament adopted by 676 votes to 14, with 1 abstention, a resolution on public access to documents (Rule 122(7) of the Rules of Procedure) - Annual Reports 2016 to 2018.
Broader transparency
Firmly resolved to continue its efforts to bring the EU closer to its citizens and its decision-making process, Parliament stressed that transparency and accountability are of crucial importance to maintain citizens' trust in the EU’s political, legislative and administrative processes. It reiterated the importance of transparency of the legislative process for citizens, as it is an important way of actively involving citizens in the legislative process.
Members regretted that the Commission and the Council insist on in camera meetings without proper justification. They also deplored the Commission's recurrent practice of providing Parliament with only a very limited amount of information on the implementation of EU legislation. The institutions were invited to respect the principle of sincere cooperation and to proactively publish this information.
The resolution also called for:
- documents sent by the Commission to Member States in the framework of infringement procedures to be accessible to the public, as with the replies to them;
- the institutions continue their discussions on the establishment of a common database and user-friendly access to the state of play of legislative files;
- the transparency of comitology procedures and the accessibility of the comitology register to be enhanced;
- the current method for finding information about the voting patterns of Members of the European Parliament to be improved.
Parliament welcomed the successful conclusion of negotiations on the Commission's proposal for an inter-institutional agreement on a mandatory transparency register and urged the three institutions to swiftly implement it.
Access to documents
Recalling that the right of public access to the institutions' documents is a fundamental right enshrined in the Charter and the Treaties, Parliament stressed that a fair balance had to be struck between the need for transparency, the need to protect personal data and the need to allow decisions to be taken with a degree of confidentiality where necessary.
Any exceptions to public access to EU documents or information should be analysed on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration that access to such documents is the rule, while exceptions from the rule are matters of strict interpretation.
Members called on all institutions, bodies, offices and agencies to develop a common approach to access to documentation, including the procedure for trialogue materials, and to explore and develop further measures to achieve maximum transparency on an ongoing basis.
Parliament called on all parties concerned to continue work on the revision of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 (blocked since 2012) to adapt the provisions of the regulation to the Lisbon Treaty and to ensure that the scope extends to all EU institutions, bodies and agencies.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2021)247
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0043/2021
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0004/2021
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0004/2021
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE660.295
- Committee opinion: PE648.269
- Committee draft report: PE648.491
- Committee draft report: PE648.491
- Committee opinion: PE648.269
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE660.295
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0004/2021
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2021)247
Activities
- Rainer WIELAND
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Ioan-Rareş BOGDAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Loránt VINCZE
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
Accès du public aux documents - rapports annuels 2016 à 2018 - Public access to documents for the years 2016-2018 - Zugang der Öffentlichkeit zu Dokumenten in den Jahren 2016–2018 - A9-0004/2021 - Ioan-Rareş Bogdan - Am 2 #
A9-0004/2021 - Ioan-Rareş Bogdan - Am 10 #
A9-0004/2021 - Ioan-Rareş Bogdan - Am 3 #
A9-0004/2021 - Ioan-Rareş Bogdan - § 13/1 #
A9-0004/2021 - Ioan-Rareş Bogdan - § 13/2 #
A9-0004/2021 - Ioan-Rareş Bogdan - Am 4S #
A9-0004/2021 - Ioan-Rareş Bogdan - Am 5 #
A9-0004/2021 - Ioan-Rareş Bogdan - Am 11 #
A9-0004/2021 - Ioan-Rareş Bogdan - Am 12 #
A9-0004/2021 - Ioan-Rareş Bogdan - § 37 #
A9-0004/2021 - Ioan-Rareş Bogdan - Am 6 #
A9-0004/2021 - Ioan-Rareş Bogdan - Am 1 #
A9-0004/2021 - Ioan-Rareş Bogdan - Am 13 #
A9-0004/2021 - Ioan-Rareş Bogdan - Am 14 #
A9-0004/2021 - Ioan-Rareş Bogdan - Am 15 #
A9-0004/2021 - Ioan-Rareş Bogdan - Am 7 #
A9-0004/2021 - Ioan-Rareş Bogdan - Am 8 #
A9-0004/2021 - Ioan-Rareş Bogdan - Am 9 #
Accès du public aux documents - rapports annuels 2016 à 2018 - Public access to documents for the years 2016-2018 - Zugang der Öffentlichkeit zu Dokumenten in den Jahren 2016–2018 - A9-0004/2021 - Ioan-Rareş Bogdan - Proposition de résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
171 |
2019/2198(INI)
2020/06/03
AFCO
33 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that the EU institutions have an obligation to implement Article 15(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and to adopt a legal instrument on access to documents in line with the democratic principles expressed in Article 10(3) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and with the rights of EU citizens enshrined in Article 42 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights; highlights that Article 15(3) of the TFEU envisages enhanced institutional scope; Recalls that each institution, body, office or agency shall ensure that its proceedings are transparent and shall elaborate in its own Rules of Procedure specific provisions regarding access to its documents, in accordance with the regulations.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recalls its resolution of 17 January 2019 on the Ombudsman’s strategic inquiry OI/2/2017 on the transparency of legislative discussions in the preparatory bodies of the Council of the EU and urges the Council to improve its rules and procedures as regards legislative transparency, including accessibility and classification of legislative documents; calls, specifically, on the Council to review its rules, ensuring that all debates, documents and information are made public and drawing up transcripts of its public meetings, fully reflecting the public interest in transparency, which should prevail over the need to protect the decision-making process; urges, further, the Ombudsman to make full use of her investigative powers under the Treaties to increase transparency in all activities, legislative and otherwise, within the EU;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recalls its resolution of 17 January 2019 on the Ombudsman’s strategic inquiry OI/2/2017 on the transparency of legislative discussions in the preparatory bodies of the Council of the EU and urges the Council to improve its rules and procedures as regards legislative transparency, including accessibility and classification of legislative documents, thereby allowing for legitimate scrutiny not only by the citizens, but also by the national parliaments; considers that the Council should record systematically the identity of Member State governments, when they express their positions in Council preparatory bodies and provide for a proactive regime of publication of its documents in a user-friendly and searchable format;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recalls its resolution of 17 January 2019 on the Ombudsman’s strategic inquiry OI/2/2017 on the transparency of legislative discussions in the preparatory bodies of the Council of the EU and urges the Council to improve its rules and procedures as regards legislative transparency, including accessibility and classification of legislative documents; Stresses the need to record systematically the identity of Member States taking positions in preparatory bodies, and stop the practice of restricting access to legislative documents while decision- making is ongoing;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Recalls its resolution of 17 January 2019 on the Ombudsman’s strategic inquiry OI/2/2017 on the transparency of legislative discussions in the preparatory bodies of the Council of the EU and urges the Council to improve its rules and procedures as regards legislative transparency, including accessibility, communication and classification of legislative documents;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Points out that international agreements are binding on, and have an effect on, EU legislation, and stresses the need to ensure transparency throughout the negotiating process; therefore regrets that the negotiations are kept secret and that citizens have access to no information other than documents leaked by the press, leading to speculation and inaccurate views on the status and nature of ongoing negotiations;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recalls that the widest possible public access to documents is essential to public scrutiny on all aspects of EU activity; recalls that trust of citizens in the Union depends on transparency;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the EU institutions to reply promptly to requests for access to documents;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Considers it unacceptable that currently the only avenue open to citizens for challenging a refusal to an access to documents request is a complaint to the Court of Justice of the European Union, which entails extremely lengthy processes, the risk of high, even prohibitive costs, and uncertain outcome, putting an unreasonable and deterring burden on citizens who wish to challenge a decision to refuse (partial) access; emphasises that this means in practice that there is no effective legal remedy against a negative decision on a request for access to documents;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Considers that EU institutions should not call on the opposing party to bear the costs of court cases; calls on the EU institutions to ensure that citizens are not prevented from challenging decisions for want of means;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that the EU institutions have an obligation to implement Article 15(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and to adopt a legal instrument on access to documents in line with the democratic principles expressed in Article 10(3) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and with the rights
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for the EU legislators to comply with the judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2018 (case T-540/15) on access to the documents of the trilogues, thereby further strengthening the culture of transparency in the EU’s legislative work; recalls nevertheless the strategic nature of these documents which are the basis of negotiating positions which do not necessarily reflect the final texts to be agreed by the co-legislators and whose publication in advance of the trilogue meeting could be subject to abuse by external parties;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for the EU legislators to comply with the judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2018 (case T-540/15) on access to the documents of the trilogues, thereby further strengthening the culture of transparency in the EU’s legislative work; underlines that a high level of transparency of the legislative process is an essential element for holding decision- makers in all EU institutions accountable;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for the EU legislators to comply with the judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2018 (case T-540/15) on access to the documents of the trilogues and to implement it as soon as possible, thereby further strengthening the culture of transparency in the EU’s legislative work;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for the EU legislators to comply with the judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2018 (case T-540/15, De Capitani case) on access to the documents of the trilogues, thereby further strengthening the culture of transparency in the EU’s legislative work;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls for the EU legislators to comply with the judgement of the General Court of 22 March 2018 (case T-540/15) on access to the documents of the trilogues, thereby further strengthening the culture of transparency and open communication in the EU’s legislative work;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Urges the EU institutions to implement without delay the commitment they undertook in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making to create a single interinstitutional database of legislative documents, allowing for the transparency of the various steps in the legislative process and providing EU citizens with clearer understanding of the EU legislative procedures;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Urges the EU institutions to implement without delay the commitment they undertook in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making to
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal to create a mandatory Transparency Register covering all EU institutions; urges the institutions to conclude the negotiations on the Commission proposal as soon as possible, rendering the work of the institutions as transparent as possible in the interest of the democratic process, while ensuring the involvement of citizens and full respect for the rule of law in the Union;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers that in camera sessions in EU institutions are often not sufficiently justified; calls for clear rules governing requests for in camera sessions in the EU institutions;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Stresses that the EU institutions have an obligation to implement Article 15(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and to adopt a legal instrument on access to documents in line with the democratic principles expressed in Article 10(3) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and with the rights of EU citizens enshrined in Articles 41 and 42 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights; highlights that Article 15(3) of the TFEU envisages enhanced institutional scope;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the creation by the Commission president of the position of Vice-President with explicit responsibility for transparency; calls on the Commission Vice-President for Values and Transparency to
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Welcomes the adoption of the Regulation (EU) 2019/788, on European Citizens’ Initiative which shall promote enhanced participation of the EU citizens in democratic life and expects the Commission to apply highest standards of transparency to the actions aiming to implement requests expressed in successful initiatives (in line with Article 15(2) and 15(3) of the Regulation);
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Recalls that, in accordance with Article 10(3) of the EU Treaty, citizens must be able to participate in the democratic life of the Union and transparency is key to this; calls for citizens to be given access to the minutes of the Council meetings, in particular so that they can see the positions adopted by their Member States.
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Recalls that, in accordance with Article 3 (TEU) and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the Union’s rich linguistic diversity must be respected; calls for citizens to be given access to all documents in all official languages of the European Union.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out that transparency and full access to documents held by the institutions must be the rule, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, and that, as already laid down in the established case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, exceptions to that rule have to be properly interpreted, taking into account the overriding public interest in terms of disclosure and in terms of the requirements of democracy, including closer involvement of citizens in the decision-making process, the legitimacy of governance, efficiency, and accountability to citizens;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines the fact that Article 10(3) of the TEU grants EU citizens the right to participate in the democratic life of the Union and stipulates that decisions must be taken as openly and closely as possible to the citizen; insists that all institutions must strive to implement these principles; stresses that as an integral part of the EU legislature, the Council is bound by the same transparency obligations as the other institutions of the EU; calls therefore on the Council to live up to these obligations;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines the fact that Article 10(3) of the TEU grants EU citizens the right to participate in the democratic life of the Union and stipulates that decisions must be taken as openly and closely as possible to the citizen; insists that all institutions must strive to implement these principles; recalls that in order to promote good governance and ensure the participation of civil society, the Union’s institutions, bodies, offices and agencies shall conduct their work as transparent as possible;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines the fact that Article 10(3) of the TEU grants EU citizens the right to participate in the democratic life of the Union and stipulates that decisions must be taken as openly and closely as possible to the citizen; insists that all institutions must strive to implement these principles, ensuring that the democratic political system remains accountable and legitimate while respecting the rule of law;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Underlines the fact that Article 10(3) of the TEU grants EU citizens the right to participate in the democratic life of the Union and stipulates that decisions must be taken as openly, transparently and closely as possible to the citizen; insists that all institutions must strive to implement these principles in an objective and non-discriminatory manner;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Regrets that it is still difficult for citizens to gain access to information held by the EU institutions due to the absence of an effective interinstitutional approach that is geared towards citizens and based on full transparency, communication and direct democracy;
source: 652.576
2020/11/13
LIBE
138 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 — having regard to the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), in particular, articles 1, 9, 10, 11 and 16 of the TEU and article 15 of the TFEU;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas, under the Treaties, the Union ‘shall observe the principle of the equality of its citizens, who shall receive equal attention from its institutions’ (Article 9 of the TEU); whereas ‘every citizen shall have the right to participate in the democratic life of the Union’, and whereas ‘decisions shall be
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 d (new) 14d. Reiterates that the conclusions of the General Court apply to all EU Institutions; stresses that any refusal for access to documents must be fully justified for every specific case;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Points out that, as a result of the entry into force of the TEU and the TFEU, the right of access to documents pertains to all EU institutions, bodies, and agencies; believes that Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 should be amended and modernised to react to the developments that have taken place in this area, also in the light of the relevant case law of the CJEU and ECtHR; Urges therefore the Council to work constructively with Parliament and finally adopt the revised Regulation;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Points out that, as a result of the entry into force of the TEU and the TFEU, the right of access to documents pertains to all EU institutions, bodies, and agencies;
Amendment 103 #
15a. Supports the civil society's call1a for a reform regarding the public hearings of the European Court of Justice to be live streamed, as it already is the case for some national and international courts, for example the Conseil Constitutionnel in France and the European Court of Human Rights; _________________ 1a https://thegoodlobby.eu/campaigns/open- letter-to-the-president-of-the-court-of- justice-of-the-european-union-asking-for- eu-courts-to-live-stream-their-public- hearings/
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Emphasises the importance of transparency and public access to documents; stresses that a high level of transparency in the legislative process is essential in terms of enabling citizens, the media and stakeholders to hold their elected officials and governments to account;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Emphasises the importance of transparency, which is essential in enhancing public accountability and public access to documents; stresses that a high level of transparency in the legislative process is essential in terms of enabling citizens, the media and stakeholders to hold their elected officials and governments to account; acknowledges the valuable role played by the Ombudsman in liaising and acting as a mediator between the EU institutions and citizens, and highlights the Ombudsman’s work in making the EU legislative process more accountable to the public;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Emphasises the importance of transparency and public access to documents in all of the EU’s official languages; stresses that a high level of transparency in the legislative process is essential in terms of enabling citizens, the media and stakeholders to hold their elected officials and governments to account; acknowledges the valuable role played by the Ombudsman in liaising and acting as a mediator between the EU institutions and citizens, and highlights the
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – subparagraph 1 (new) Recalls in this respect the Ombudsman decision, dated 19/12/2017, in case 682/2014/JF where the Commission's requirement that all persons who ask for public access to documents must provide their postal address for its paper post sending arrangements is maladministration, highlighting that insisting on renewed requests and procedural formalities, when they are unnecessary and serve no obvious useful purpose, shows a lack of respect for citizens' fundamental rights;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Stresses that ensuring that citizens are able to understand, follow in detail and participate in the progress of legislation is a legal requirement under the Treaties and a basic requirement for democratic scrutiny and democracy as a whole; calls on the EU institutions to make available documents forming part of, or related to, legislative procedures; believes that documents created in trilogues such as agendas, summaries of outcomes, minutes and general approaches in the Council are related to legislative procedures and should be treated as legislative documents; considers that the EU institutions should make as many documents as possible accessible to the public via their websites;
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Points out that the transparency of the comitology procedures and the accessibility of the comitology register should be further increased and changes to its content should be made in order to ensure that there is greater transparency concerning the decision-making process; underlines that improving the search functions of the register to allow searches by policy area would be an essential element in this process;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas Article 15 of the TFEU states that ‘in order to promote good governance and ensure the participation of civil society, the Union’s institutions, bodies, offices and agencies shall conduct their work as openly as possible’ and that ‘any citizen of the Union, and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State, shall have a right of access to documents of the Union’s institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, subject to the principles and the conditions defined in the EU secondary legislation’;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Welcomes the investigations opened by the European Ombudsman into the malpractices of the agency FRONTEX when it comes to public access to documents; Urges the Agency to comply with its legal and moral obligations by granting access and publishing its available documents;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 b (new) 16b. Deplores the fact that the Council does not proactively publish most documents related to legislative files, preventing citizens from knowing which documents actually exist and thus impeding their right to request access to documents; regrets the fact that available information on legislative documents is presented by the Council in a register which is incomplete and not user-friendly; calls on the Council to list in a user- friendly public register all the documents related to legislative files, irrespective of their format and their classification;
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 c (new) 16c. Considers the Council’s practice of systematically classifying documents distributed in its preparatory bodies relating to legislative files as ‘LIMITE’ to be a violation of the CJEU case law and of the legal requirement that there should be the widest possible public access to legislative documents; calls on the Council to fully implement the rulings of the CJEU; recalls that the ‘LIMITE’ marking has no solid legal basis and considers that the Council’s internal guidelines should be reviewed in order to guarantee that documents can only be marked as ‘LIMITE’ in duly justified cases complying with CJEU caselaw;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Fully endorses the European ombudsman’s recommendations to the Council following the strategic inquiry,
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Takes note of the fact that Parliament has seen a significant increase in applications requesting public access to the multi-column documents discussed in trilogue meetings following the judgment of the General Court in the De Capitani case5 , and notes with satisfaction that since the judgment, Parliament has disclosed all the multi-column documents to which access was requested under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001; welcomes this fact since the openness of the legislative process contributes to conferring greater legitimacy on the institutions in the eyes of EU citizens; _________________ 5Judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2018, Emilio De Capitani v European Parliament, T-540/15, ECLI:EU:T:2018:167.
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Takes note of the fact that Parliament has seen a significant increase in applications requesting public access to the multi-column documents discussed in trilogue meetings following the judgment of the General Court in the De Capitani case5 , and notes
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Underlines that the Court ruling in the De Capitani case in March 2018 states that the institutions’ views reflected in the ‘four-column’ documents did not fall under a general presumption of non-disclosure; notes that the sensitive nature of the subject matter reflected in the trilogue documents was not in itself considered to constitute sufficient grounds for refusing access to the public; notes that access to documents relating to ongoing trilogues must in principle be granted on specific request, unless the institution proves that it is reasonably foreseeable and not purely hypothetical that full access to the documents at issue is likely to undermine, specifically and actually, the decision- making process;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Regrets that until the present day the advices of the Legal Service of the European Parliament are limited in access, often even not available for the Members of other committees; Calls upon the institution to increase transparency and make all the legal advices publicly accessible;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Recalls that the Court makes it clear that where a document originating in an EU institution is covered by an exception to the right to public access, the institution must clearly assess
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas, in view of the growing distance between the EU and its citizens, the EU institutions must strive for the highest possible standards of transparency, accountability and integrity; whereas these principles are key components in promoting good governance within the EU institutions and in ensuring greater openness in the functioning of the EU and its decision- making process, and whereas these should be the leading principles of the culture within the institutions;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Welcomes that the ClientEarth vs Commission case significantly clarifies the scope of the concept of "legislative documents" and CJEU found that documents drawn up in the context of an impact assessment qualify as legislative documents and thus cannot be protected under a general presumption against public disclosure;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 b (new) 20b. Notes that as regards the exception for the protection of international relations, the General Court acknowledges in several cases, the wide margin of appreciation held by the institution in its framework due to the particularly sensitive and essential nature of the interests protected;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Stresses that privacy and the protection of personal data should be respected while ensuring transparency, securing a case by case evaluation and observing the principle of restrictively interpreting exceptions to the right of citizens of accessing public information and documents;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Stresses that privacy and the protection of personal data should be respected while ensuring transparency and free movement of personal data;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Calls on the EU institutions to develop a common approach to access to documentation, including the procedure for trilogue materials;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Calls on all the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies to constantly explore
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 22. Calls on
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls on the institutions to ensure the transparency of legislative procedures on the basis of the relevant legislation and case law; emphasises at the same time the need to maintain a balance between transparency targets and preserving the cohesion, effectiveness and flexibility of legislative procedures;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 23. Calls on the institutions to ensure the transparency of legislative procedures on the basis of the relevant legislation
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 a (new) 23a. Regrets that official documents are frequently over-classified; reiterates its position that clear and uniform rules should be established for the classification and declassification of documents;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas, on the other hand, under Article 339 of the TFEU „the members of the institutions of the Union, the members of committees, and the officials and other servants of the Union shall be required, even after their duties have ceased, not to disclose information of the kind covered by the obligation of professional secrecy”;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 23 b (new) 23b. Urges the Council to align its working methods with the standards of a parliamentary and participatory democracy as required under the Treaties, and reiterates that the Council must be as accountable and transparent as the other institutions;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Emphasises that open democratic societies depend on the ability of citizens to access a variety of verifiable information sources so that they can form a view on different issues; emphasises, too, that citizens’ access to information enhances accountability in decision-making and is, therefore, essential for the efficient functioning of democratic societies;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24.
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 24. Emphasises that open democratic societies depend on the ability of citizens to access a variety of verifiable information sources in their own official language so that they can form a view on different issues;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Calls on all the institutions to improve communication to the public during the whole legislative cycle and to proactively disseminate more of their own documents related to the legislative procedure through their publication on their websites and in various Registers;
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 a (new) 24a. Requests urgent measures to enhance the transparency of decisions taken in infringement procedures;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 b (new) 24b. Calls on the institutions to step up efforts for establishing a dedicated and user-friendly joint database on the state of play of legislative files for which work is ongoing as agreed in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 c (new) 24c. Requests the Interinstitutional Committee established by Article 15(2) of Regulation (EC)No 1049/2001 to proactively report to the competent committees and to systematically have discussions and deliberations with civil society, the European Ombudsman and the European Data Protection Supervisor;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 24 d (new) 24d. Calls on the institutions to evaluate and, where necessary, review their internal arrangements for reporting wrongdoing, and calls for enhanced protection of whistleblowers;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the right of access to documents, and its nature as a fundamental right, is further emphasised by Article 42 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, which now enjoys "the same legal value as the Treaties";
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas the right of access to documents is a fundamental right, protected by the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the Treaties, which should be exercised as early as possible enabling citizens to effectively exercise their right to scrutinise the work and activities of EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, in particular the legislative process;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) Bb. whereas the functioning of Union institutions should be in compliance with the principle of the rule of law; whereas transparency and good governance form essential components of such requirement;
Amendment 17 #
C. whereas the European Parliament should work
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the European Parliament works with a
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 2 — having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular articles 41 and 42;
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C b (new) Cb. whereas in 2018 the Ombudsman launched a new website, which includes a revised and user-friendly interface for potential complainants; whereas the Ombudsman's "fast-track" procedure for dealing with complaints about public access to documents reflects the Ombudsman's commitment to provide assistance and to take decisions quickly for those seeking assistance;
Amendment 21 #
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the Ombudsman’s strategic inquiry OI/2/2017/TE found that the Council’s lack of transparency regarding public access to its legislative documents and its current practices in its decision- making process, specifically during the preparatory stage at the Council preparatory bodies, including its Committees, working parties and the Committee of Permanent Representatives (COREPER) constitute maladministration; whereas on 16 May 2018, following the Council’s reluctance to implement her recommendations, the Ombudsman submitted Special Report OI/2/2017/TE on the transparency of the Council legislative process to Parliament; whereas in its resolution of 17 January 2019 on the Ombudsman’s strategic inquiry, Parliament endorsed the Ombudsman’s recommendations; whereas the Council’s absence of commitment in ensuring transparency reflects a lack of accountability in its role as EU co- legislator;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas in case 1302/2017/MH on the European Commission's handling of a request for public access to the opinions of its Legal Service concerning the Transparency Register, the Ombudsman found that the European Commission's continuous refusal to grant access to the documents constitutes maladministration due to the fact that the Commission has failed to be as open and forthcoming as possible about the very measure aimed at promoting transparency as a means to achieve greater EU legitimacy and accountability;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas citizens’ trust in the EU institutions is fundamental for democracy, good governance and effective policy- making; whereas there is a need to reduce accountability gaps within the EU and to ensure modes of scrutiny which combine democratic oversight, control and auditing activities, while also ensuring maximum transparency;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas ensuring the EU is transparent by enabling access to documents to allow Union citizens to see how and why decisions are made and to enable Parliament’s position of strong support for transparency for the citizen;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D b (new) Db. whereas openness and transparency principles should govern not only the decision-making process but also the way in which a text is drafted; whereas transparency and access to documents should also be guaranteed in relation to how EU policies are implemented at all levels and how EU funds are used;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D b (new) Db. whereas openness and the participation of civil society are essential conditions for promoting good governance of the EU institutions and with it the effectiveness of the decision- making process;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D c (new) Dc. whereas, in accordance with the basic principles of democracy, citizens have a right to know and to follow the decision-making process, and whereas the fulfilment of this responsibility by the EU institutions and the Council throughout the legislative process should allow the media comprehensive democratic scrutiny;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D c (new) Dc. whereas according to Article 16(8) TEU the Council must meet in public when it deliberates and votes on a draft legislative act; whereas designating most preparatory documents in ongoing legislative procedures as ‘LIMITE’ represents a disproportionate restriction on citizens’ right to access legislative documents;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 a (new) - having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to Community institutions and bodies1a, _________________ 1a OJ L 264, 25.9.2006, p. 13.
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D d (new) Dd. whereas there is a clear public interest in disclosing legislative documents so that citizens can effectively exercise their right to scrutinise the legislative process; whereas in order to enable citizens to fully exercise their right to access documents, all legislative documents produced and/or circulated in preparatory bodies should be listed in a user-friendly public register;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D d (new) Dd. whereas the need for transparency should be in careful balance with the need to protect personal data and to allow decisions to be made with a degree of confidentiality where necessary;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Is resolutely determined in its endeavour to bring citizens closer to its decision-making process; stresses that Article 10(3) TEU recognises participatory democracy as one of the main democratic principles of the EU, thereby highlighting that decisions must be taken as close to citizens as possible; recalls that fully democratic and highly transparent decision-making at the European level is indispensable to increase citizens’ trust in the EU institutions;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Is resolutely determined in its endeavour to bring citizens closer to its decision-making process, for example by making widespread use of impact assessments, ensuring transparency in the negotiations on international agreements, respecting the national parliaments and refraining from rejecting initiatives by European citizens for ideological reasons;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Is resolutely determined in its endeavour to bring citizens closer to its decision-making process in order to improve the quality and social legitimacy of its decisions, and create the right conditions for the information, consultation and participation of citizens in its decision-making process;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Emphasises the importance of transparency in the functioning of the EU institutions in particular under extraordinary circumstances such as the current Covid-19 pandemic situation; recalls that the principle of transparency includes knowledge of the decision- making process; emphasises that in emergency situations it is particularly important that certain parliamentary bodies do not expand beyond their remit and the Parliament acts in accordance with the existing rules;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Emphasises the necessity for all the institutions of the EU to move forward with a similar level of transparency;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes with satisfaction the designation of a Commissioner responsible for transparency with a mission to introduce greater transparency into the legislative process in the European institutions and in the Member States, for the benefit of EU citizens;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Notes
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 a (new) - having regard to its resolution of 11 March 2014 on public access to documents (Rule 104(7)) for the years 2011-2013;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Emphasises that transparency and accountability are fundamental to retaining citizens’ trust in the EU’s political, legislative and administrative activities;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that Parliament represents the interests of European citizens in an open and transparent manner, with the aim of keeping them fully informed and with due regard for their needs and aspirations, as confirmed by the Ombudsman
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that Parliament should, in theory, represent
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Regrets that the decision making process in the Council is still shrouded in secrecy, and that the Council tries to circumvent CJEU rulings rather than implementing them;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Calls on all Member States to take example from Austria, which proactively and swiftly publishes Council documents, including Council presidency proposals;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 c (new) Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 d (new) 3d. Regrets the Commission's refusal to publish statistics indicating the effectiveness of EU policies, which hinders any public scrutiny over policies significantly impacting fundamental rights; calls on the Commission to proactively publish such statistics in order to prove that policies are necessary and proportionate to achieve their objective;
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 e (new) 3e. Calls on the Commission to be more transparent as regards contracts with third parties; calls on the Commission to proactively publish information about the tender process including the criteria against which third parties tenders are assessed, possible prior risk assessments, scientific evidence of the effectiveness of the product or service covered, the contract including the amount of EU funding spent and time period, the desired outcomes, possible audits and the assessment of the result;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Points out that transparent law- making is of the utmost importance to citizens and the only way to ensure their active participation in the law-making process; welcomes the 2016 Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) on Better Law-Making, and the commitment therein by the three institutions to ensure the transparency of legislative procedures on the basis of relevant legislation and case law, including an appropriate handling of trilateral negotiations;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Points out that transparent law- making is of the utmost importance to citizens;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 b (new) - having regard to its legislative resolution of 15 December 2011 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (recast)1a, _________________ 1a Text adopted, P7_TA(2011)0580)
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the institutions to continue discussions on moving towards the establishment of a dedicated joint database on the state of play of legislative files (Joint Legislative Database) as agreed in the IIA on Better Law-Making;underlines the importance of considering each institution’s individual needs in this regard;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Calls on the institutions to continue discussions on moving towards the establishment of a dedicated joint database on the state of play of legislative files (Joint Legislative Database) as agreed in the IIA on Better Law-Making and greater transparency;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Welcomes the initiatives already launched which address public demands for more transparency, such as the Interinstitutional Register of Delegated Acts launched on December 2017 as a joint tool of the European Parliament, European Commission and the Council giving access to the whole lifecycle of delegated acts;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Recognises the new Code of Conduct for the Commission’s members which entered into force in February 2018, and which increases transparency primarily in relation to the meetings held between the Commissioners and interest representatives, as well as to the costs of the business travel of individual Commissioners; underlines that under Article 15 of the TFEU all citizens of the European Union have a right of access to the documents and information arising from the activity of the European Commission, covering details of meetings, agendas and even minutes; calls on the Commission to fulfil this obligation especially in situations where the statement of the other participating party is contrary to the own allegations of the Commission;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Recognises the new Code of Conduct for the Commission’s members which entered into force in February 2018, and which i
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Recalls its revised Rules of Procedure according to which Members are invited to adopt the systematic practice of only meeting interest representatives that have registered in the Transparency Register; also recalls that Members are invited to publish online all scheduled
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Recalls its revised Rules of Procedure according to which Members are invited to adopt the systematic practice of only meeting interest representatives that have registered in the Transparency Register;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Recalls its revised Rules of Procedure according to which Members are
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 a (new) - having regard to its resolution of 16 November 2017 on the annual report on the activities of the European Ombudsman in 20161a, _________________ 1a Text adopted, P8_TA(2017)0449.
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Considers that the current way to find the voting behaviour of Members of European Parliament, via pdf-files covering hundreds of votes on the Parliament's website, is not user-friendly and does not contribute to the EU's transparency; calls for a user-friendly system where for each roll-call vote the text voted and the voting results per group and per MEP are visible at the same time;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Reiterates its call on the Council, including its preparatory bodies, to urgently sign up to the Transparency Register
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Deeply regrets the fact that
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Stresses the importance of the measures taken to enhance the transparency of decisions taken in infringement procedures; regrets the lack of transparency regarding letters of formal notice and infringement procedures against Member States; calls, in particular, for documents sent by the Commission to Member States in connection with such procedures, and the related replies, to be made accessible to the public; calls, furthermore, for information on the execution of judgments of the CJEU to be published proactively;
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Regrets the slow advancement of the negotiations of the Interinstitutional Agreement on the mandatory Transparency Register with the Commission; underscores the need to maintain the trust of all citizens to be open and honest about who we are meeting, reiterating that these negotiations must be pursued actively;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Points out that national governments and parliaments, when deciding on EU matters, are part of the EU legislature, and therefore any meetings with interest representatives lobbying national authorities in their capacity as EU legislators, should be published;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Stresses that international agreements have binding force and an impact on EU legislation, and underlines the need for negotiations to be transparent throughout the entire process; recalls that according to Article 218 TFEU, the Parliament shall be fully and immediately informed at every stage while negotiations are taking place; calls on the Commission to step up further efforts to ensure full compliance with Article 218 TFEU;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Deeply regrets that the Commission and Council demand in- camera meetings in Parliament without proper justification; calls for clear criteria and rules governing requests for in camera sessions in the EU institutions;
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 c (new) 9c. Regrets that institutions still call for in-camera meetings without proper justification; reiterates its call on the institutions to assess and publicly justify requests for in-camera meetings; considers that requests for in-camera meetings should be evaluated on a case- by-case basis and believes that an independent oversight authority should oversee the classification and declassification processes;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 8 a (new) - having regard to the Annual Reports of the European Ombudsman and to her Special Report in strategic inquiry OI/2/2017/TE on the transparency of the Council legislative process,
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Recalls that the right of public access to documents of the institutions is
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Recalls that the right of public access to documents of the institutions is inextricably linked with the democratic nature of the institutions; recalls that the widest possible public access to documents is essential to public scrutiny on all aspects of EU activity; recalls that trust of citizens in the Union depends on transparency;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Recalls that the right of public access to documents of the institutions is inextricably linked with the democratic nature of the institutions and, because the institutions fall within the sphere of public service, they must serve the citizens’ best interests when carrying out their activities;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Recalls that the right of public access to documents of the institutions in all of the EU’s official languages is inextricably linked with the democratic nature of the institutions;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 – subparagraph 1 (new) Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Reiterates its proposals made in previous reports on access to documents, and regrets the lack of serious follow up by Commission and Council;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Points out that transparency and full access to documents held by the institutions have to be the rule, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, and that, as has already been stipulated by the precedents consistently set by the CJEU, exceptions to that rule have to be properly interpreted, taking into account the overriding public interest in disclosure and in the requirements of democracy, including closer involvement of citizens in the decision-making process, good governance, efficiency and accountability to citizens;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Points out that transparency and full access to documents held by the institutions have to be the rule, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, and that, as has already been stipulated by the precedents consistently set by the CJEU, exceptions to that rule have to be properly interpreted; points out that at the same time neither Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 nor CJEU rulings oblige the EU institutions to proactively publish legislative documents;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Points out that transparency and full access to documents held by the institutions have to be the rule, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, and that, as has already been stipulated by the precedents consistently set by the CJEU, exceptions to that rule
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Reiterates its regret that official documents are frequently over-classified; repeats its call on the Commission to propose a regulation laying down clear and uniform rules and criteria for the classification of documents by the EU institutions, bodies and agencies, in addition to rules on transparency;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 8 b (new) - having regard to President Ursula von der Leyen’s Political Guidelines for the Commission 2019-2024,
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Takes note of the fact that the Commission faces the highest number of initial applications (6 912 in 2018) involving specified documents, followed by the Council (2 474 in 2018) and Parliament (498 in 2018); acknowledges the overall positive response rate (in 2018 the figures were just 80% for the Commission, 72.2% for the Council and 96% for Parliament);
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Notes with interest that the main grounds for refusal are based on the need to protect the decision-making process of the institutions, the privacy and the integrity of individuals, and the commercial interests of a specific natural or legal person; further notes that for Parliament, the protection of legal advice has also been a relevant ground in cases where mainly Bureau documents were requested, while for the Commission, carrying out inspections, investigations and audits, and public security were also
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Recalls that according to the European Ombudsman, restrictions on access to documents, particularly legislative documents, should be exceptional and limited to what is absolutely necessary; recalls as well, that any decision denying public access to documents must be based on clearly and strictly defined legal exemptions, accompanied by reasoned and specific justification, allowing citizens to understand the denial of access, and to make effective use of the legal remedies available; calls in this regard on the EU institutions, bodies and agencies to adopt faster, less cumbersome and more accessible procedures for handling complaints against refusals to grant access; considers that a more proactive approach would help ensure effective transparency as well as prevent unnecessary legal disputes that could result in unnecessary costs and burdens for both the citizens and the institutions;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Welcomes the decision of the European Court of Justice, in case C- 213/15 P (Commission v Patrick Breyer), where the Court upheld the judgment of the General Court, finding that the Commission cannot refuse access to written submission of the Member States held by it, on the sole ground that they are documents relating to court proceedings. The Court considers that any decision on such an application for access must be taken on the basis of Regulation 1049/2001. Documents linked to the Court of Justice's judicial activity are not, as a matter of principle, outside the scope of the Regulation, where they are in the possession of the EU institutions listed in the Regulation, such as the Commission in this specific case.
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Considers it unacceptable that currently the only legal avenue open to citizens for challenging a refusal to an access to documents request is to bring a legal action in the CJEU, which entails extremely lengthy processes, the risk of high, even prohibitive costs, and uncertain outcome, putting an unreasonable and deterring burden on citizens who wish to challenge a decision to refuse (partial) access; emphasises that this means in practice that there is no effective legal remedy against a negative decision on a request for access to documents; welcomes the European Ombudsman fast-track procedure for access to documents, but regrets that her recommendations to the institutions are not legally binding;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. Notes with concern that consequent negotiations to the revision of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 from2008 developed in a way that may hinder rather than facilitate transparency;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13a. recalls its calls on the Commission and the Council in its resolution of 28 April 2016 on public access to documents for the years 2014-2015;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Welcomes the decision of the Council of the EU, further to the opening by the Ombudsman of case 1011/2015/TN, to apply Regulation 1049/2001 to documents held by its General Secretariat in relation to tasks of support to various intergovernmental bodies and entities, such as the opinions of the panel in case, regarding the candidates' suitability to perform the duties of Judge and Advocate-General at the Court of Justice and the General Court of the EU. Salutes the Ombudsman opinion that greater openness is to be favoured regarding the issue of how to strike the correct balance between the need to protect the personal data of persons being assessed for high public office with the need to ensure maximum transparency in relation to the process of making appointments to high public office.
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Stresses that whistle-blowers are crucial figures in unveiling cases of maladministration, and supports measures to encourage whistle-blowing effectively and improve the protection of whistle-blowers against retaliation; considers necessary to further assess the implementation of the internal whistle- blowing rules in the EU institutions;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Urges the Council to adapt the Regulation in a progressive way following developments from the Lisbon Treaty and the TFEU; calls on the Council and Commission to do their part to re-enter the process on the revision of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 in a timely manner;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the Union ‘shall observe the principle of the equality of its citizens, who shall receive equal attention from its institutions’ (Article 9 of the TEU); whereas ‘every citizen’ shall have the right to participate in the democratic life of the Union’, and whereas ‘decisions shall be taken as openly as possible and as closely as possible to the citizen’ (Article 10(3) of the TEU, read in the light of the thirteenth recital of its preamble and its Articles 1(2) and 9); whereas the European Union does not actually respect its own rules at all;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13b. Considers that EU institutions should not call on the opposing party to bear the costs of court cases; calls on the EU institutions to ensure that citizens are not prevented from challenging decisions for want of means;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 c (new) 13c. Emphasis that when the EU institutions issue official documents or reports that have any sort of impact on the Member States or their citizens, the right to know the identity and background of those who wrote them prevails over the need to protect the privacy rights of the individuals who wrote such documents or reports;
Amendment 92 #
13c. Reaffirms its commitment to revising Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, adapting it to the Treaty of Lisbon to ensure that its scope extends to all EU institutions, bodies and agencies, with the ultimate aim of giving EU citizens wider and improved access to EU documents;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 d (new) 13d. Condemns the fact that the Council has classified Section III, Legal Analysis from the opinion of its Legal Service with respect to the Commission's proposal for a Regulation on the protection of the Union's budget in case of generalised deficiencies as regards the rule of law in the Member States. The European citizens have, thus, been deprived of their right to access such an important source of information regarding critical legislation deeply impacting the citizens of the EU. Notes that in such cases the interest of the public to be aware of the content of these documents is paramount, condemns the opacity of the Council and urges it to make the entire opinion of its Legal Service available;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Recalls that the revision of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 has been blocked since 2012, and
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Recalls that the revision of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 has been blocked since 2012, and
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Recalls that the revision of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 has been blocked since 2012, and
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Reiterates the importance of not over classifying documents which leads to less public scrutiny and strongly urges that attention must be paid to this over classification which risks to be used as an underhand way of preventing access to documents;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 b (new) 14b. Concerned that a common reason given for refusal to access documents in the European Parliament was to protect personal data or privacy; Recognises that while this reason may be legitimate at times, it cannot be used to prevent open access to the Parliaments’ work;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 c (new) 14c. Underscores that the prerequisite to give access to documents are the appropriate tools and conditions for our Institutions to be able to respond towards the huge increase in requests for documents, in particular trilogue and Bureau documents;
source: 660.295
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/4/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=55673&j=0&l=en
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/group |
Old
EPP - Group of European People's PartyNew
Group of European People's Party |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.491New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-PR-648491_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.269New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFCO-AD-648269_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.295New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AM-660295_EN.html |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2/type |
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, single readingNew
Committee report tabled for plenary |
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20210208&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-9-2021-02-08-TOC_EN.html |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.269&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.269 |
docs/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.269New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.269&secondRef=02 |
docs/3 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
98582
|
forecasts/0/date |
Old
2021-01-18T00:00:00New
2021-02-08T00:00:00 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.269&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.269 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.295
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.269New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.269&secondRef=02 |
docs/2 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.269&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.269 |
forecasts/0/date |
Old
2020-10-07T00:00:00New
2021-01-18T00:00:00 |
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.269New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.269&secondRef=02 |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.269&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.269 |
docs |
|
forecasts/0/date |
Old
2020-06-17T00:00:00New
2020-10-07T00:00:00 |
forecasts/0/date |
Old
2020-06-15T00:00:00New
2020-06-17T00:00:00 |
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/1 |
|
forecasts |
|
events |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |