BETA


2019/2551(RSP) Resolution on the draft Commission implementing decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified maize 4114 (DP-ØØ4114-3)

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ENVI PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa (icon: PPE PPE), BALAS Guillaume (icon: S&D S&D), MAZURONIS Valentinas (icon: ALDE ALDE), STAES Bart (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), EVI Eleonora (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 112-p2

Events

2019/08/30
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2019/03/13
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2019/03/13
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 442 votes to 160 with 20 abstentions, a resolution objecting to the draft Commission implementing decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified maize 4114 (DP-ØØ4114-3), pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

The application for placing on the market was submitted on 27 November 2014 by Pioneer Overseas Corporation, on behalf of Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc., established in the United States of America, to the national competent authority of the Netherlands. On 19 April 2018, EFSA adopted a favourable opinion in relation to the application.

GM maize 4114 was developed to express three insecticidal proteins (Cry1F, Cry34Ab1and Cry35Ab1) for protection against specific lepidopteran and coleopteran pests, and the PAT protein conferring tolerance to the herbicidal active ingredient glufosinate-ammonium.

Main observations

Lack of assessment and controls of complementary herbicides and their residues

Members considered that the application of complementary herbicides, in this case glufosinate, is part of regular agricultural practice in the cultivation of herbicide-resistant plants. It can therefore be expected that they will be exposed to both higher and repeated doses, which will not only lead to a higher burden of residues in the harvest, and therefore in the imported product, but may also influence the composition of the genetically modified plant and its agronomic characteristics.

The use of glufosinate has not been permitted in the Union since 1 August 2018, as it has been classified as toxic to reproduction and thus falls under the cut-off criteria set out in Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market.

Members also stressed the following points:

-information on residue levels of herbicides and their metabolites is essential for a thorough risk assessment of herbicide-tolerant GM plants. However, the impact of spraying GM maize with herbicides has not been assessed;

-as part of the coordinated multiannual control programme of the Union for 2019, 2020 and 2021, Member States are not obliged to measure glufosinate residues on any maize imports in order to ensure compliance with maximum residue levels (MRLs) . Therefore, it cannot be guaranteed that glufosinate residues on GM maize 4114 will comply with Union MRLs.

Bt toxins

Members indicated that a 2017 scientific study on the possible health impacts of Bt toxins and residues from spraying with complementary herbicides concludes that specific attention should be paid to the herbicide residues and their interaction with Bt toxins . However, this was not investigated by EFSA.

Lack of democratic legitimacy

The vote on 14 January 2019 of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health delivered no opinion, meaning that the authorisation was not supported by a qualified majority of Member States.

The Commission deplored the fact that, since the entry into force of the GMO authorization procedure, the Commission has adopted authorisation decisions without the support of the opinion of the Member States’ committee. The return of the dossier to the Commission for final decision, which is very much the exception for the procedure as a whole, has become the norm for decision-making on genetically modified food and feed authorisations.

In the light of these considerations, Parliament considered that the draft Commission implementing decision is not consistent with Union law, which aims to provide the basis for ensuring a high level of protection of human life and health, animal health and welfare, and environmental and consumer interests in relation to genetically modified food and feed, while ensuring the effective functioning of the internal market.

Accordingly, Parliament called on the Commission to:

- withdraw its draft implementing decision;

- not to authorise the import, for food or feed uses, of any GM plants which have been made tolerant to a herbicide that is not authorised for use in the Union, in this case glufosinate;

- not to authorise any herbicide-tolerant GM plants without a full assessment of the residues from spraying with complementary herbicides, metabolites and commercial formulations as applied in the countries of cultivation;

- fully integrate the risk assessment of the application of complementary herbicides and their residues into the risk assessment of herbicide-tolerant GM plants, regardless of whether the GM plant concerned is to be cultivated in the Union or is for import into the Union for food and feed uses;

- suspend any implementing decision regarding applications for authorisation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) until the authorisation procedure has been revised in such a way as to address the shortcomings of the current procedure, which has proven inadequate;

- withdraw proposals for GMO authorisations if no opinion is delivered by the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, whether for cultivation or for food and feed uses.

Parliament reiterated its commitment to advancing work on the Commission proposal amending Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 (the Comitology Regulation). It called on the Council to move forward with its work in relation to that Commission proposal as a matter of urgency.

Documents
2019/03/13
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2019/03/07
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2019/01/21
   EP - PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2019/01/21
   EP - BALAS Guillaume (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2019/01/21
   EP - MAZURONIS Valentinas (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2019/01/21
   EP - STAES Bart (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2019/01/21
   EP - EVI Eleonora (EFDD) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI

Documents

Votes

B8-0141/2019 - Résolution 13/03/2019 17:14:57.000 #

2019/03/13 Outcome: +: 442, -: 160, 0: 20
IT FR PL DE ES BG RO EL AT HU PT GB SI SK LV SE DK CY MT IE HR NL BE EE LT LU FI CZ
Total
57
62
43
84
48
15
19
13
15
15
15
57
8
11
7
18
10
6
6
10
10
25
18
6
8
6
10
18
icon: S&D S&D
164

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1
3

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2
icon: ENF ENF
31

Poland ENF

For (1)

1

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Austria ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

4

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
31

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
57

Italy ECR

3

Germany ECR

Against (2)

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Sweden ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Belgium ECR

3

Finland ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2
icon: NI NI
13

Italy NI

For (1)

1

France NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

2

Germany NI

1

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Germany ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

3

Lithuania ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Czechia ALDE

For (1)

4
icon: PPE PPE
171

Greece PPE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1

Ireland PPE

For (1)

4

Croatia PPE

4

Belgium PPE

4

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3

Finland PPE

Against (1)

2

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/rapporteur/3
name
BOYLAN Lynn
date
2019-01-21T00:00:00
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0141_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0141_EN.html
events/1
date
2019-03-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0196_EN.html title: T8-0196/2019
summary
events/1
date
2019-03-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0196_EN.html title: T8-0196/2019
summary
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0141&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0141_EN.html
docs/1
date
2019-08-30T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=32399&j=0&l=en title: SP(2019)444
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
events/0
date
2019-03-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0196 title: T8-0196/2019
summary
events/0
date
2019-03-13T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=32399&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/1
date
2019-03-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0196 title: T8-0196/2019
summary
events/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0196
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0196_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
associated
False
rapporteur
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
associated
False
date
rapporteur
commission
  • body: EC dg: Agriculture and Rural Development commissioner: HOGAN Phil
committees
  • type: Responsible Committee body: EP committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI associated: False date: 2019-01-21T00:00:00 2019-01-21T00:00:00 2019-01-21T00:00:00 2019-01-21T00:00:00 2019-01-21T00:00:00 2019-01-21T00:00:00 rapporteur: name: PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE name: BALAS Guillaume group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D name: MAZURONIS Valentinas group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE name: BOYLAN Lynn group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL name: STAES Bart group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE name: EVI Eleonora group: Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy abbr: EFDD
docs
  • date: 2019-03-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0141&language=EN title: B8-0141/2019 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
events
  • date: 2019-03-13T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0196 title: T8-0196/2019 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 442 votes to 160 with 20 abstentions, a resolution objecting to the draft Commission implementing decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified maize 4114 (DP-ØØ4114-3), pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The application for placing on the market was submitted on 27 November 2014 by Pioneer Overseas Corporation, on behalf of Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc., established in the United States of America, to the national competent authority of the Netherlands. On 19 April 2018, EFSA adopted a favourable opinion in relation to the application. GM maize 4114 was developed to express three insecticidal proteins (Cry1F, Cry34Ab1and Cry35Ab1) for protection against specific lepidopteran and coleopteran pests, and the PAT protein conferring tolerance to the herbicidal active ingredient glufosinate-ammonium. Main observations Lack of assessment and controls of complementary herbicides and their residues Members considered that the application of complementary herbicides, in this case glufosinate, is part of regular agricultural practice in the cultivation of herbicide-resistant plants. It can therefore be expected that they will be exposed to both higher and repeated doses, which will not only lead to a higher burden of residues in the harvest, and therefore in the imported product, but may also influence the composition of the genetically modified plant and its agronomic characteristics. The use of glufosinate has not been permitted in the Union since 1 August 2018, as it has been classified as toxic to reproduction and thus falls under the cut-off criteria set out in Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market. Members also stressed the following points: -information on residue levels of herbicides and their metabolites is essential for a thorough risk assessment of herbicide-tolerant GM plants. However, the impact of spraying GM maize with herbicides has not been assessed; -as part of the coordinated multiannual control programme of the Union for 2019, 2020 and 2021, Member States are not obliged to measure glufosinate residues on any maize imports in order to ensure compliance with maximum residue levels (MRLs) . Therefore, it cannot be guaranteed that glufosinate residues on GM maize 4114 will comply with Union MRLs. Bt toxins Members indicated that a 2017 scientific study on the possible health impacts of Bt toxins and residues from spraying with complementary herbicides concludes that specific attention should be paid to the herbicide residues and their interaction with Bt toxins . However, this was not investigated by EFSA. Lack of democratic legitimacy The vote on 14 January 2019 of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health delivered no opinion, meaning that the authorisation was not supported by a qualified majority of Member States. The Commission deplored the fact that, since the entry into force of the GMO authorization procedure, the Commission has adopted authorisation decisions without the support of the opinion of the Member States’ committee. The return of the dossier to the Commission for final decision, which is very much the exception for the procedure as a whole, has become the norm for decision-making on genetically modified food and feed authorisations. In the light of these considerations, Parliament considered that the draft Commission implementing decision is not consistent with Union law, which aims to provide the basis for ensuring a high level of protection of human life and health, animal health and welfare, and environmental and consumer interests in relation to genetically modified food and feed, while ensuring the effective functioning of the internal market. Accordingly, Parliament called on the Commission to: - withdraw its draft implementing decision; - not to authorise the import, for food or feed uses, of any GM plants which have been made tolerant to a herbicide that is not authorised for use in the Union, in this case glufosinate; - not to authorise any herbicide-tolerant GM plants without a full assessment of the residues from spraying with complementary herbicides, metabolites and commercial formulations as applied in the countries of cultivation; - fully integrate the risk assessment of the application of complementary herbicides and their residues into the risk assessment of herbicide-tolerant GM plants, regardless of whether the GM plant concerned is to be cultivated in the Union or is for import into the Union for food and feed uses; - suspend any implementing decision regarding applications for authorisation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) until the authorisation procedure has been revised in such a way as to address the shortcomings of the current procedure, which has proven inadequate; - withdraw proposals for GMO authorisations if no opinion is delivered by the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, whether for cultivation or for food and feed uses. Parliament reiterated its commitment to advancing work on the Commission proposal amending Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 (the Comitology Regulation). It called on the Council to move forward with its work in relation to that Commission proposal as a matter of urgency.
  • date: 2019-03-13T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
procedure
reference
2019/2551(RSP)
title
Resolution on the draft Commission implementing decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified maize 4114 (DP-ØØ4114-3)
subject
type
RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
subtype
Resolution on implementing act or powers
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure EP 112-p2
stage_reached
Procedure completed
dossier_of_the_committee
ENVI/8/15426