Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | LIBE | ZARZALEJOS Javier ( EPP) | ROBERTI Franco ( S&D), TUDORACHE Dragoş ( Renew), BRICMONT Saskia ( Verts/ALE), VANDENDRIESSCHE Tom ( ID), JAKI Patryk ( ECR), DALY Clare ( GUE/NGL) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 088-p2-a1
Legal Basis:
TFEU 088-p2-a1Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 470 votes to 118, with 16 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters as regards the entry of alerts by Europol.
The proposed Regulation aims at establishing a specific category of alerts in the interest of the Union entered into the SIS by the Member States following a proposal by Europol for the exchange of information on persons involved in serious crime or terrorism, as well as the rules applicable to this category.
The European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amends the Commission's proposal as follows:
Information alerts on third country nationals in the interest of the Union
In order to bridge the gap in sharing information on serious crime and terrorism, in particular on foreign terrorist fighters, the amended text stressed the need to ensure that, upon a proposal by Europol, Member States are able to enter information alerts into SIS on third-country nationals in the interest of the Union, in order to make that information provided by third countries and international organisations available, directly and in real time, to front-line officers in Member States.
The amending Regulation provides for the creation of a specific category of alerts in the SIS for information on third country nationals in the interest of the Union. These alerts should be entered into the SIS by the Member States, at their discretion and subject to verification and analysis of the proposal by Europol, in order to inform end-users searching the SIS that the person concerned is suspected of being involved in a criminal offence for which Europol is competent.
Europol should:
- share all information it holds on a particular case, except for information that has clearly been obtained in gross violation of human rights;
- share the outcome of cross-checking the data against its databases, information relating to the accuracy and reliability of the data and its analysis of whether there are sufficient grounds for considering that the person concerned has committed, taken part in, or intends to commit a criminal offence in respect of which Europol is competent;
- inform the Member States without delay where it has relevant additional or modified data in relation to its proposal to enter an information alert into SIS or evidence suggesting that data included in its proposal are factually incorrect or have been unlawfully stored, in order to ensure the lawfulness, completeness and accuracy of SIS data;
- transmit to the issuing Member State without delay additional or modified data in relation to an information alert that was entered into SIS upon its proposal, in order to allow the issuing Member State to complete or modify the information alert.
When an alert for information is entered in the SIS, the Member State issuing the alert will inform the other Member States and Europol by means of an exchange of supplementary information. Where Member States decide not to enter the alert for information proposed by Europol and where the relevant conditions are met, they may decide to enter another type of alert on the same person.
Member States should put in place the necessary procedures for entering, updating and deleting information alerts in SIS in accordance with this Regulation.
Europol should keep records relating to its proposals for entering information alerts into SIS under this Article and provide reports to Member States every six months on the information alerts entered into SIS and on the cases where Member States did not enter the information alerts.
Execution of the action based on an information alert
In the event of a hit on an information alert, the executing Member State should collect and communicate to the issuing Member State all or some of the following information:
- the fact that the person who is the subject of an information alert has been located;
- the place, time and reason for the check;
- the route of the journey and destination;
- the persons accompanying the subject of the information alert who can reasonably be expected to be associated with the subject of the information alert;
- objects carried, including travel documents;
- the circumstances in which the person was located.
Dactyloscopic data in SIS in relation to alerts entered may also be searched using complete or incomplete sets of fingerprints or palm prints discovered at the scenes of serious crimes or terrorist offences under investigation, where it can be established to a high degree of probability that those sets of prints belong to a perpetrator of the offence and provided that the search is carried out simultaneously in the Member State's relevant national fingerprints databases
A Member State may enter an alert on a person for a period of one year. The issuing Member State should review the need to retain the alert within that one-year period. Alerts on persons should be deleted automatically after the review period has expired.
Alerts on objects entered should be reviewed where they are linked to an alert on a person. Such alerts should only be kept for as long as the alert on the person is kept.
Alerts for information entered should be deleted as soon as the alert expires.
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the report by Javier ZARZALEJOS (EPP, ES) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters as regards the entry of alerts by Europol.
The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
Alerts
Europol may only enter an alert in SIS after it has established that this is necessary and justified, by ensuring that a detailed individual analysis of the data provided confirmed the reliability of the source of information and the accuracy of the information on the person concerned.
Europol may enter alerts on third-country nationals in SIS for the purpose of informing end-users carrying out a search in SIS that those persons are suspected of being involved in or have been convicted of a criminal offence.
Review period for alerts on persons
Europol may enter an alert on a third-country national for a period of three years.
Data protection
Where personal data is entered in SIS, it is proposed that Europol should inform the data subject of the possibility of lodging a complaint with the European Data Protection Supervisor and seeking a judicial remedy from the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Monitoring and statistics
Members added that eu-LISA should also produce daily, monthly and annual statistics showing the number of entries of alerts proposed by Europol, against which a reasoned objection was expressed by a Member State, categorised by Member State and by objection provided.
Entry into force, start of operation and application
The report proposed that Europol should by six months after the entry into force of this amending Regulation, notify the Commission that it has made the necessary technical and procedural arrangements to process SIS data and exchange supplementary information pursuant to this Regulation.
No later than one year after the entry into force of this amending Regulation, the Commission should adopt a decision setting the date from which Europol may start entering, updating and deleting alerts in SIS, pursuant to this Regulation.
PURPOSE: to establish a specific alert category issued by Europol in SIS in order to exchange information on persons who represent a threat to the internal security of the European Union.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: given the increasingly global nature of serious crime and terrorism brought about by growing mobility, the information that third countries and international organisations obtain about criminals and terrorists is increasingly relevant for the EU‘s security. Such information should contribute to the comprehensive efforts to ensure internal security in the European Union. Some of this information is only shared with Europol. While Europol holds valuable information received from external partners on serious criminals and terrorists, it cannot issue alerts in SIS. Member States are also not always able to issue alerts in SIS on the basis of such information.
In order to bridge the gap in information sharing on serious crime and terrorism, in particular on foreign terrorist fighters – where the monitoring of their movement is crucial – it is necessary to ensure Europol is able to make this information available directly and in real-time to front-line officers in Member States.
Europol should therefore be authorised to enter alerts in SIS, in full respect of fundamental rights and data protection rules. To that end, the Commission proposes that a specific category of alert should be created in SIS, to be issued exclusively by Europol, in order to inform end-users carrying out a search in SIS that the person concerned is suspected of being involved in a criminal offence in respect of which Europol is competent, and in order for Europol to obtain confirmation that the person who is subject to the alert has been located.
This Commission proposal is part of the Counter-Terrorism package.
CONTENT: the present proposal seeks to amend Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters as regards the entry of alerts by Europol. In particular, it widens the scope of application of the current SIS by introducing a new alert category for Europol.
Specific provisions
The proposal seeks to:
- enable Europol to issue ‘information alerts’ on suspects and criminals as a new alert category in SIS, for exclusive use by Europol in specific and well-defined cases and circumstances. This is an important paradigm change for SIS, as until now, only Member States could enter, update and delete data in SIS and Europol had ‘read-only’ access covering all alert categories. Europol would be able to issue alerts on the basis of its analysis of third-country sourced information or information from international organisations, within the scope of crimes falling under Europol’s mandate and only on third-country nationals who are
not beneficiaries of free movement rights. The purpose of the new alert category is that in case of a ‘hit’, the alert would inform the frontline officer that Europol holds information on the person;
- set out detailed provisions on the procedural requirements that Europol is required to fulfil prior to entering an alert in SIS;
- align the obligations and requirements of Europol when entering alerts in SIS with alert issuing Member States. These requirements concern: categories of data, proportionality, minimum data content for an alert to be entered, entering biometric data, general data processing rules, quality of the data in SIS as well as rules on distinguishing between persons with similar characteristics, misused identity and links. The frontline officer would be required to report immediately the occurrence of the ‘hit’ to the national SIRENE Bureau, which would in turn contact Europol. The frontline officer would only report that the person who is subject of an alert was located and would indicate the place, time and reason for the check carried out;
- define the review period for alerts entered by Europol as well as the alert deletion rules which are specific to this type of alert. As a general rule, an alert should be kept only for the time that is necessary to achieve the purpose for which it was entered.
Budgetary implications
The budgetary impact, estimated at EUR 1 820 000 for the period 2021-2022, reflects the changes required for establishing this new alert category in Central SIS by eu-LISA, the EU Agency responsible for the management and development of Central SIS.
The expenses related to the development of the national systems connected to Central SIS are to be covered by the resources available to the Member States under the new Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027 for the development and maintenance of SIS. The proposal would also require Europol to set up a technical interface for entering, updating and deleting data in Central SIS.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2022)412
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2022/1190
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 185 12.07.2022, p. 0001
- Draft final act: 00016/2022/LEX
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T9-0227/2022
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A9-0287/2021
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE693.797
- Committee draft report: PE689.819
- Contribution: COM(2020)0791
- Contribution: COM(2020)0791
- Contribution: COM(2020)0791
- Contribution: COM(2020)0791
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2020)0791
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Committee draft report: PE689.819
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE693.797
- Draft final act: 00016/2022/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2022)412
- Contribution: COM(2020)0791
- Contribution: COM(2020)0791
- Contribution: COM(2020)0791
- Contribution: COM(2020)0791
Votes
Modification du règlement (UE) 2018/1862 sur l'établissement, le fonctionnement et l'utilisation du système d'information Schengen (SIS) dans le domaine de la coopération policière et de la coopération judiciaire en matière pénale en ce qui concerne l'introduction de signalements par Europol - Amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters as regards the entry of alerts by Europol - Änderung der Verordnung (EU) 2018/1862 über die Einrichtung, den Betrieb und die Nutzung des Schengener Informationssystems (SIS) im Bereich der polizeilichen Zusammenarbeit und der justiziellen Zusammenarbeit in Strafsachen hinsichtlich der Aufnahme von Ausschreibungen durch Europol - A9-0287/2021 - Javier Zarzalejos -Décision d’engager des négociations interinstitutionnelles (commission LIBE) #
Renforcement du mandat d'Europol: introduction de signalements dans le SIS - Strengthening Europol’s mandate: entry of alerts in SIS - Stärkung des Mandats von Europol: Eingabe von Ausschreibungen im SIS - A9-0287/2021 - Javier Zarzalejos - Accord provisoire - Am 50 #
Amendments | Dossier |
139 |
2020/0350(COD)
2021/06/07
LIBE
139 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a –paragraph 3 – point a (a) a
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 3 – point b (b) a verification confirmed that
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 3 – point c (c) a search in SIS, carried out in accordance with Article 48 of this Regulation, did not disclose the existence of an alert on the suspect or accused person concerned;
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 3 – point d Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 3 – point d – introductory part (d) a consultation, involving the sharing of information on the suspect or accused person concerned with Member States participating in Regulation (EU) 2016/794 in accordance with Article 7 of that Regulation, confirmed that
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 3 – point d – point i Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 3 – point d – point ii Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 4 4. Europol shall keep detailed records relating to the entry of
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 4 4. Europol shall keep detailed records relating to the entry of the alert in SIS and all the grounds for such entry to permit
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 4 4. Europol shall keep detailed records relating to the
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Europol shall keep detailed records relating to the proposed entry of an alert in SIS against which a reasoned objection was expressed by a Member State. Those records shall be made available for the purpose of the report pursuant to Article 74(3).
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 5 Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 5 5. Europol shall inform all Member States of the entry of
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 5 a – new 5a. Alerts on persons referred to in points (a) and (b) of paragraph 2 shall be verified and entered in accordance with the national law of the issuing Member State and with the requirements and provisions enshrined in Articles 36 and 37 of this Regulation.
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 6 Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 6 6. The requirements and obligations applicable to the issuing Member State in Articles 20, 21, 22, 42, 56, 59, 61, 62 and 63 shall apply
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. The Fundamental Rights Officer and the Data Protection Officer shall be involved whenever Europol uses the SIS and in the procedure determining the grounds on the basis of which Europol proposes to enter an alert in SIS. The EDPS shall be informed and may also be involved if he or she deems it necessary on a case-by-case basis.
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 1. In the event of a hit on an alert
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37b – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. In the event of a hit on an alert
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37b – paragraph 1 – point a (a) collect and communicate to the issuing Member State and to Europol the following information:
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37b – paragraph 1 – point a (a) collect and immediately communicate the following information:
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37b – paragraph 1 – point a – point i (i) the fact that the suspect or accused person who is the subject of an alert has been located;
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37b – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii (ii) the place, time and reason for the check
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37b – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37b – paragraph 1 – point b (
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37b – paragraph 1a (new) 1a. The Fundamental Rights Officer and the Data Protection Officer shall be informed where there is a hit on an alert proposed by Europol. The EDPS shall be informed and may also be involved if he or she deems it necessary on a case-by- case basis.
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37b – paragraph 2 2. The executing Member State shall communicate the information referred to in paragraph 1(a) to Europol through the exchange of supplementary information. The executing Member State shall exchange information with Europol based on a timely assessment of the immediate risk of life or serious harm for individuals, particularly minors.
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37b – paragraph 2 2. The executing Member State shall communicate the information referred to in paragraph 1(a)
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37b – paragraph 2 2. The executing Member State shall immediately communicate the information referred to in paragraph 1(a) to Europol through the exchange of supplementary information.
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37b – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Further measures will be taken by the executing Member States in accordance with paragraphs 3 to 7 of Article 37. Europol may provide support in line with the requirements and obligations of Regulation (EU) 2016/794.
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 48 – title Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 48 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Europol shall, where strictly necessary and duly justified to fulfil its mandate, as well as in consultation with the Fundamental Rights Officer and the Data Protection Officer, have the right to access and search data in SIS and to
Amendment 132 #
Europol
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 48 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Europol
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point c Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 48 – paragraph 4 4. Europol's use of information obtained from a search in SIS or from the processing of supplementary information shall be subject to the consent of the Member State that provided the information either as issuing Member State or as executing Member State. If the Member State allows the use of such information, its handling by Europol shall be governed by Regulation (EU) 2016/794
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point d Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 48 – paragraph 7a 7a. The European Data Protection Supervisor shall carry out
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point d Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 48 – paragraph 7a 7a. The European Data Protection Supervisor shall carry out an audit of the data processing operations of Europol under this Regulation in accordance with international auditing standards at least every
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point -a (new) Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 53 – paragraph 4 (-a) paragraph 4 is replaced by the following: 4. A Member State may enter an alert on a person for the purposes of points (c), (d) and (e) of Article 32 (1), of Article 36 and
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 53 – paragraph 5a Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point a Regulation EU 2018/ 1862 Article 53 – paragraph 5a 5a. Europol may enter an alert on a
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 53 – paragraph 6 6. Within the review period referred to in paragraphs 2, 3, 4
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 53 – paragraph 7 7. Alerts on persons shall be deleted automatically after the review period referred to in paragraphs 2, 3, 4
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b Regulation EU 2018/ 1862 Article 53 – paragraph 7 7. Alerts on
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6 – point b Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 53 – paragraph 8 8. Member States and Europol shall keep statistics on the number of alerts on persons the retention periods of which have been extended in accordance with
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 55 – paragraph 6a – introductory part 6a. Alerts on persons entered
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 55 – paragraph 6a – point a a (new) (aa) a decision to delete them by the competent authority of the issuing Member State;
Amendment 146 #
(b) a decision to delete them by
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 55 – paragraph 6a – point c Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point b Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 56 – paragraph 5 5. With regard to the alerts laid down in Articles 26, 32, 34, 36, 37a, 38 and 40 of this Regulation, any processing of information in SIS for purposes other than those for which it was entered into SIS has to be linked with a specific case and justified by the need to prevent an imminent and serious threat to public policy and to public security, on serious grounds of national security or for the purposes of preventing a serious crime. Prior authorisation from the issuing Member State
Amendment 150 #
1. Where upon a new alert being entered it becomes apparent that there is already an alert in SIS on a person with the same description of identity, the SIRENE Bureau shall contact the issuing Member State
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 61 – paragraph 2 2. Where the cross-check reveals that the subject of the new alert and the person subject to the alert already entered in SIS are indeed one and the same person, the SIRENE Bureau of the issuing Member State shall apply the procedure for entering multiple alerts referred to in Article 23.
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 67 – paragraph 1 (1) Data subjects shall be able to exercise the rights laid down in Articles 15, 16 and 17 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, in the national provisions transposing Article 14 and Article 16 (1) and (2) of Directive (EU) 2016/680 and in Chapter IX of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725, including the right to obtain the immediate erasure of all the information entered in the system in the cases foreseen in Article 55(6a).
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 67 – paragraph 2 (2) A Member State other than the issuing Member State may provide to the data subject information concerning any of the data subject's personal data that are being processed only if it first gives the issuing Member State an opportunity to state its position.
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 67 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part (3) A Member State in accordance with its national law, including law transposing Directive (EU) 2016/680
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 In cases referred to in the first subparagraph, the Member State
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 67 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 The Member State
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 67 – paragraph 4 (4) Following an application for access, rectification or erasure, the Member State
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 (1) Without prejudice to the provisions on remedies of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and of Directive (EU) 2016/680, any person may bring an action before any competent supervisory authority or a court, under the law of any Member State to access, rectify, erase, obtain information or obtain compensation in connection with an alert relating to him or her. The competent supervisory authority shall regularly inform the person of the progress and the outcome of the action.
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 68 – paragraph 2 (2) Without prejudice to the provisions on remedies of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725, any person may lodge a complaint with the European Data Protection Supervisor in order to access, rectify, erase, obtain information or obtain compensation in connection with
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 68 – paragraph 3 (3) The Member States
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation EU 2018/ 1862 Article 68 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part (4) Member States and Europol shall report annually to the European Data Protection Board and the European Parliament on:
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 68 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part (4) Member States and Europol shall report annually to the European Data Protection Board and the European Parliament on:
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 68 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part (4) Member States
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 68 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part (4) Member States
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 68 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point g (g) any observations on cases of mutual recognition of final decisions handed down by the courts or authorities of other Member States on alerts entered by the issuing Member State
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 68 –paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point g a new (ga) the number of alerts on persons the retention periods of which have been extended in accordance with paragraph 6 of Article 53(8).
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 68 – paragraph 5 (5) The reports from the Member
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 68 – paragraph 5 (5) The reports from the Member States
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 a (new) Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 71 – paragraph 4 (11a) in Article 71, paragraph 4 is replaced by the following: 4. A joint report of activities as regards coordinated supervision shall be sent annually by the European Data Protection Board to the European Parliament, to the Council,
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 72 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 72 – paragraph 3 (3) Claims for compensation against a Member State for the damage referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be governed by the national law of that Member State. Claims for compensation against Europol for the damage referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be governed by Regulation (EU) 2016/794 and subject to the conditions provided for in the Treaties. Any person who has suffered material or non-material damage as a result of an infringement of Regulation (EU) 2016/794 shall have the right to receive compensation in accordance to Article 65 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725. Claims for compensation against eu-LISA for the damage referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be subject to the conditions provided for in the Treaties.
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 74 – paragraph 3 3. eu-LISA shall produce daily, monthly and annual statistics showing the number of records per category of alerts, both for each Member State, Europol and in aggregate. eu-LISA shall also provide annual reports on the number of hits per category of alert, how many times SIS was searched and how many times SIS was accessed for the purpose of entering, updating or deleting an alert, both for each Member State, Europol and in aggregate. eu-LISA shall also produce daily, monthly and annual statistics showing the number of entries of records proposed by Europol, against which a reasoned objection was expressed by a Member State, per Member State and categorised by reason provided. The statistics produced shall not contain any personal data. The annual statistical report shall be published.
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 3. eu-LISA shall produce daily, monthly and annual statistics showing the number of records per category of alerts, both for each Member State
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 a (new) Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 78 a new (13a) The following article 78a is inserted: Article 78a Reporting The Commission shall, by [three years after entry into force of this Regulation], submit to the European Parliament and to the Council, an impact assessment and evaluation of the implementation of the provisions relating to the entry of alerts in SIS by Europol. The report shall assess the impact of those provisions on fundamental rights and freedoms as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights, as well as their added value.
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 a (new) Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 79 – paragraph 3 (13a) In Article 79, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: 3. The Commission shall closely monitor the process of gradual fulfilment of the conditions set out in paragraphs 2 and 7 and shall inform the European Parliament and the Council about the outcome of the verification referred to in that paragraph.
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 79 – paragraph 7 Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 79 – paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 79 – paragraph 7 7. The Commission shall adopt a decision setting the date on which Europol
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 79 – paragraph 7 7. The Commission shall adopt a decision setting the date
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 79 – paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Europol shall notify, at the latest [six months after entry into force of the amending regulation ]the Commission that it has made the necessary technical and procedural arrangements to process SIS data and exchange supplementary information pursuant to this Regulation as amended by Regulation [xxx/xxxx]
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation – The European Parliament rejects Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters as regards the entry of alerts by Europol.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) The Schengen Information System (‘SIS’) constitutes
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) The Schengen Information System (‘SIS’) constitutes an
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) The European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol), established by Regulation (EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council29 , plays an important role in
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) The European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol), established by Regulation (EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council29
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Given the increasingly global nature of serious crime and terrorism brought about by growing mobility, the information that third countries
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Given the
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) In order to bridge the gap in information sharing on serious crime and terrorism, in particular on foreign terrorist fighters – where the monitoring of their movement
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) In order to bridge the gap in information sharing on serious crime and terrorism
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Europol
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) Given the lack of democratic oversight over Europol, it is not desirable to enable Europol itself to establish SIS rules. That does not diminish the importance of SIS. It is up to Europol to adequately share the information it obtains through third parties with the Member States concerned.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) To that end, a specific category of alert should be created in SIS,
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) To that end,
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In order to assess, based on objective criteria and in line with the principle of necessity and proportionality, whether a concrete case is adequate, relevant and important enough to warrant the entry of an alert in SIS, and in order to confirm the reliability of the source of information and the accuracy of the information on the person concerned, Europol should carry out a detailed individual assessment of each case including further consultations with the third country
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In order to assess whether a concrete case is adequate, relevant and important enough to warrant the entry of an alert in SIS, and in order to confirm the reliability of the source of information and the accuracy of the information on the person concerned, that the information was not obtained in breach of fundamental rights of the person, that it was not communicated to Europol for unlawful purposes or motivated by political reasons, Europol should carry out a detailed individual assessment of each case, including further consultations with the third country
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In order to assess whether a concrete case is adequate, relevant and important enough to warrant the entry of an alert in SIS, and in order to confirm the reliability of the source of information and the accuracy of the information on the person concerned, Europol should carry out a detailed individual assessment of each case including further consultations with the third country or international organisation that shared the data on the person concerned, consultation with Member States, as well as further analysis of the case, in particular by cross checking it against information it already holds in its databases, to confirm the accuracy of the information and complement it with other data on the basis of its own databases. The detailed individual assessment should include the analysis of whether there are sufficient grounds for considering that the person has committed or taken part in, or will commit a criminal offence in respect of which Europol is competent.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) In order to assess whether a concrete case is adequate, relevant and important enough to warrant the entry of an alert in SIS, and in order to confirm the reliability of the source of information and the accuracy of the information on the person concerned, Europol should carry out a detailed individual assessment of each case including further consultations with the third country or international organisation that shared the data on the person concerned, as well as further analysis of the case, in particular by cross checking it against information it already holds in its databases,
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) Europol should only be able to propose to the Member States to enter an alert in SIS if the suspect or accused person concerned is not already subject to a SIS alert issued by a Member State. A further precondition for the creation of such an alert should be that Member States do not object to the alert being issued in SIS. Therefore, it is necessary to establish further rules on the obligations of Europol
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) Europol should only be able to enter an alert in SIS if the person concerned is not already subject to a SIS alert issued by a Member State. A further precondition for the creation of such an alert should be that Member States do not object to the alert being issued in SIS. Therefore, it is necessary to establish rules on the obligations
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) Europol should keep records of the individual assessment of each case, which should include the grounds for
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) Europol should keep records of the individual assessment of each case
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) Europol should keep records of the individual assessment of each case, which should include the grounds for entering the alert, for the purposes of verifying the lawfulness of the data processing, self- monitoring and ensuring proper data integrity and security. In accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/794, Europol should co-operate with the European Data Protection Supervisor and make these records available to the EDPS upon request, so that they can be used for monitoring processing operations.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) It is necessary to establish additional rules concerning the deletion of alerts entered in SIS
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) It is necessary to establish rules concerning the deletion of alerts entered in SIS by Europol. An alert should be kept only for the time required to achieve the purpose for which it was entered. It is therefore appropriate to set out detailed criteria to determine when the alert should be deleted. An alert entered by Europol in SIS should be deleted
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) It is necessary to establish rules concerning the deletion of alerts entered in SIS by Europol. An alert should be kept only for the time required to achieve the purpose for which it was entered. It is therefore appropriate to set out detailed criteria to determine when the alert should be deleted. An alert entered by Europol in SIS should be deleted in particular if a Member State objects, another alert is entered in SIS by a Member State on the same person, or if Europol becomes aware that the information received from the third country or international organisation was incorrect or was communicated to Europol for unlawful purposes, for example if sharing the information on the person was motivated by political reasons.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 a (new) (13a) The implementation of this regulation and the necessary adaptation of implementing acts should not interfere nor should be subject to the deadlines stipulated in regulation 2018/18621a while new deadlines for the implementation of this regulation should be added, along with reporting obligations. _________________ 1aRegulation (EU) 2018/1862 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 November 2018 on the establishment, operation and use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, amending and repealing Council Decision 2007/533/JHA, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1986/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Decision 2010/261/EU.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) Since the objectives of this Regulation, namely
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) Since the objectives of this Regulation, namely the establishment and regulation of a specific alert category issued by the Member States at the instigation of Europol in SIS in order to exchange information on persons who represent a threat to the internal security of the European Union, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, but can rather, by reason of their nature be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU). In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) This Regulation fully respects fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Regulation fully respects the protection of personal data in accordance with Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 2 – paragraph 2 2. This Regulation also lays down provisions on the technical architecture of SIS, on the responsibilities of the Member States, the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (‘Europol’) and of the European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA), on data processing, on the rights of the persons concerned
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 3 – point 22 Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1– point 3 – point a Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 24 – paragraph 1 1. Where a Member State considers that to give effect to an alert entered in accordance with Article 26, 32, 36 or 37a is incompatible with its national law, its international obligations or essential national interests, it may require that a flag be added to the alert, after it has provided the reasons for doing so, to the effect that the action to be taken on the basis of the alert will not be taken in its territory. Flags on alerts entered in accordance with Article 26, 32 or 36 shall be added by the SIRENE Bureau of the issuing Member State, flags
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Regulation (EU) 2018/ 1862 Article 24 – paragraph 1 1. Where a Member State considers that to give effect to an alert entered in accordance with Article 26, 32, 36 or 37a is incompatible with its national law, its international obligations or essential national interests, it may require that a flag be added to the alert, after providing justification for the request, to the effect that the action to be taken on the basis of the alert will not be taken in its territory. Flags on alerts entered in accordance with Article 26, 32 or 36 shall be added by the SIRENE Bureau of the issuing Member State, flags on alerts entered in accordance with Article 37a shall be added by Europol.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 24 – paragraph 1 1. Where a Member State considers
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point b Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 24 – paragraph 3 Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Chapter IXa – Title Alerts
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Chapter IXa – Title Alerts entered
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 1 1. Europol may
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 1 1. Europol may
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/ 1862 Article 37a – paragraph 1 1. Europol may enter alerts on persons in SIS for the purpose of informing end- users carrying out a search in SIS of the suspected involvement of those
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Europol may
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Europol may only
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Europol may only enter an alert in SIS on persons who are third-country nationals on the basis of information received from a third country or an international organisation in accordance with Article 17(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2016/794, where, following a detailed individual assessment, it has established that the information relates to one of the following:
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Europol may only enter an alert in SIS on persons who are third-country nationals on the basis of information received from a third country referred to in Article 25 (1) of Regulation 2016/794 or an international organisation in accordance with Article 17(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2016/794, where the information relates to one of the following:
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Europol may only enter an alert in SIS on persons who are third-country nationals on the basis of information received from a third country
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 2 – point a (a)
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 2 – point b (b)
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 2 – point b (b) persons regarding whom there are
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. Europol may only enter an alert in SIS after it has e
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. Europol may only
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. Europol
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 Regulation (EU) 2018/1862 Article 37a – paragraph 3 – point a (a) an analysis of the data provided in accordance with paragraph 2 confirmed the reliability of the source of information and the accuracy of the information on the suspect or accused person concerned, permitting Europol to determine that that person falls within the scope of paragraph 2,
source: 693.797
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/4/date |
Old
2021-04-20T00:00:00New
2021-04-19T00:00:00 |
docs/5/date |
Old
2021-03-18T00:00:00New
2021-03-17T00:00:00 |
docs/6/date |
Old
2021-03-01T00:00:00New
2021-02-28T00:00:00 |
docs/7/date |
Old
2021-03-19T00:00:00New
2021-03-18T00:00:00 |
events/0 |
|
events/8 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/date |
Old
2021-04-19T00:00:00New
2021-04-20T00:00:00 |
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/date |
Old
2021-03-17T00:00:00New
2021-03-18T00:00:00 |
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/date |
Old
2021-02-28T00:00:00New
2021-03-01T00:00:00 |
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/date |
Old
2021-03-18T00:00:00New
2021-03-19T00:00:00 |
events/0 |
|
events/10 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities/0 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
events/10 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting signature of actNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
docs/0 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/date |
Old
2021-04-20T00:00:00New
2021-04-19T00:00:00 |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/date |
Old
2021-03-18T00:00:00New
2021-03-17T00:00:00 |
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/date |
Old
2021-03-01T00:00:00New
2021-02-28T00:00:00 |
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/date |
Old
2021-03-19T00:00:00New
2021-03-18T00:00:00 |
docs/7 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/2 |
|
events/8/summary |
|
events/9 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Awaiting signature of act |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0227_EN.html
|
events/8/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0227_EN.html
|
docs/2 |
|
events/8 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st readingNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
docs/0 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/date |
Old
2021-04-20T00:00:00New
2021-04-19T00:00:00 |
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/date |
Old
2021-03-18T00:00:00New
2021-03-17T00:00:00 |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/date |
Old
2021-03-01T00:00:00New
2021-02-28T00:00:00 |
docs/5 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/7 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
docs/4 |
|
forecasts |
|