2020/2017(INI) Artificial intelligence in education, culture and the audiovisual sector
Next event: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading 2021/05/17 more...
Lead committee dossier:
Next event: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading 2021/05/17 more...
- Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading 2021/03/16
- Amendments tabled in committee 2020/10/08
- Committee opinion 2020/09/22
- Committee opinion 2020/09/14
- Committee draft report 2020/07/30
- Committee opinion 2020/07/16
- Committee opinion 2020/07/06
Progress: Awaiting committee decision
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
2021/05/17
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
2021/03/16
EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2020/10/08
EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2020/09/22
EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2020/09/14
EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2020/07/30
EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2020/07/16
EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2020/07/06
EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2020/02/18
EP - VAN SPARRENTAK Kim (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in IMCO
2020/02/18
EP - DZHAMBAZKI Angel (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in JURI
2020/01/16
EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2020/01/16
EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2020/01/15
EP - CARVALHO Maria da Graça (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM
2020/01/13
EP - KOVAŘÍK Ondřej (Renew) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2019/12/17
EP - VERHEYEN Sabine (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in CULT
Documents
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE658.907
- Committee opinion: PE652.373
- Committee opinion: PE646.839
- Committee draft report: PE655.862
- Committee opinion: PE650.370
- Committee opinion: PE648.349
- Committee opinion: PE648.349
- Committee opinion: PE650.370
- Committee draft report: PE655.862
- Committee opinion: PE646.839
- Committee opinion: PE652.373
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE658.907
Activities
- Maria da Graça CARVALHO
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Fabio Massimo CASTALDO
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Angel DZHAMBAZKI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Eva MAYDELL
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Martina MICHELS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Victor NEGRESCU
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Paul TANG
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Sabine VERHEYEN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Pernando BARRENA ARZA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Laurence FARRENG
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Patryk JAKI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Marcel KOLAJA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Ondřej KOVAŘÍK
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Ibán GARCÍA DEL BLANCO
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Svenja HAHN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Beata MAZUREK
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Kim VAN SPARRENTAK
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Miriam LEXMANN
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN
Plenary Speeches (0)
Amendments | Dossier |
120 |
2020/2017(INI)
2020/04/15
IMCO
120 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Whereas AI has the potential to offer solutions for day-to-day challenges of the education sector such as the personalisation of learning, monitoring learning difficulties and automation of subject-specific content/knowledge, providing better professional training and support the transition to a digital society;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has
Amendment 100 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 101 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for recommendation
Amendment 102 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for recommendation algorithms and personalised marketing on audiovisual platforms, including video streaming platforms and news platforms, and on platforms disseminating cultural and creative content, to be transparent, in order to give consumers and users insight into these processes and ensure that personalised services are not discriminatory; stresses the need to guarantee and properly implement the right of users to easily and reversibly opt out from recommended and personalised services.
Amendment 103 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for recommendation algorithms and personalised marketing on audiovisual platforms, including video streaming platforms and news platforms, to be transparent, in order to give consumers an accurate and comprehensive insight into these processes and ensure that personalised services are not discriminatory or incomplete; stresses the need to guarantee and properly implement the right of users to opt out from recommended and personalised services.
Amendment 104 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for recommendation algorithms and personalised marketing on audiovisual platforms, including video streaming platforms and news platforms, to be transparent, in order to give consumers an accurate insight into these processes and content, and ensure that personalised services are not discriminatory; stresses the need to guarantee and properly implement the right of users to opt out from recommended and personalised services.
Amendment 105 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for recommendation
Amendment 106 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for recommendation algorithms and personalised marketing on audiovisual platforms, including video streaming platforms and news platforms, to be
Amendment 107 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls for audiovisual platforms to be responsible for their content in order to protect the rights of both consumers and pupils, ensuring that their fundamental rights are not infringed, and in order to prevent fake news and disinformation;
Amendment 108 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Considers that, since automatic translation tools have made so much progress, content providers and commercial digital platforms should be encouraged to provide subtitling of educational and cultural programmes in the languages of the European Union;
Amendment 109 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Notes that the access to data is a challenge that stakeholders face and might have an impact on developing and AI ecosystem; points toward anachronic legislation like the Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases and calls for its removal.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has proposed to rapidly deploy products and services that rely on AI in areas of public interest and the public sector; emphasises that in the education sector, this deployment should involve educators, learners and wider society and take their needs and the expected benefits into account in order to ensure that AI is used purposefully and ethically; considers that all products and services developed with public funding should be published under open-source licenses and be accessible to the general public;
Amendment 110 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. recalls how Artificial intelligence could be a perfect tool to allow a wide audience of users to remotely enjoy public cultural heritage (e.g. exhibitions or museums) for information purposes, "tourism", but also research; therefore encourages cultural institutions to exploit the potential of AI to make their contents widely accessible;
Amendment 111 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Suggests that audiovisual content for educational purposes should be catalogued and classified according to age groups in order to facilitate an effective selection of the most suitable contents;
Amendment 112 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) Amendment 113 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Stresses the need to improve the digital skills of educators, learners and wider society, whilst having regard to ´A Europe fit for the digital age´; emphasises that the AI solutions, products and services for the public sector and specifically for the education, must be human-centric or have human-in- command approach; recognises that the AI market amounts to around USD 664 million and is expected to grow to USD 38.8 billion by 2025; expects that the EU enhances its approach to promoting investment and financing of new AI solutions; underlines the need for constant strengthening of the single market and avoiding its fragmentation; stresses the need to integrate AI services into the Digital single market strategy;
Amendment 114 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Underlines that consumers shall be informed when they are interacting with an automated decision process and that their choices and performance are not limited; stresses that the use of AI mechanisms on commercial surveillance of consumers shall be countered, even if it concerns "free services", ensuring that it is strictly in line with fundamental rights and GDPR; all regulatory changes shall take in consideration the impact on vulnerable consumers.
Amendment 115 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Points out to the fact that creations made by AI, if marketed, could create distortions in the cultural and creative sector, affecting pricing and remuneration to the detriment of human creators.
Amendment 116 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Points out that the deployment, development and implementation of AI must make it easier for consumers and pupils with some form of disability to use tools to access audiovisual content;
Amendment 117 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Considers that commercial digital platforms should be encouraged to provide access to their programmes in all the languages in which their content is disseminated in Europe, i.e. without blocking access to certain languages according to the geographical location of the consumer when the oral or written version is available for other countries of dissemination.
Amendment 118 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. supports the use of AI related to the dissemination of texts and manuscripts, especially ancient ones, through the web, to preserve them from destruction but at the same time to make them accessible to a wide mass of users, including researchers, experts and scholars.
Amendment 119 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. Calls on the authorities and private education providers to include in the education curriculum content for building digital skills in an increasingly digital society, underlines the need for upskilling future workforce; recognises the benefit of forecasting jobs that will be disrupted by digital technology such as automation, digitalisation and AI.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has proposed to support public procurement in intelligent digital services, to encourage public authorities to rapidly deploy products and services that rely on AI in areas of public interest and the public sector; emphasises that in the education sector, this deployment should involve educators, learners and wider society and take their needs and the expected benefits into account in order to ensure that AI is used purposefully and ethically and delivers real improvements for those concerned, at an affordable cost to the taxpayer;
Amendment 120 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Points out that the AI systems that are developed, implemented and used in the European Union, in any of the three sectors referred to in this report, must reflect the EU's cultural diversity and multilingualism.
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has proposed to rapidly deploy products and services that rely on AI in areas of public interest and the public sector; emphasises that in the education sector, this deployment should involve educators, learners and wider society and take their needs and the expected benefits into account in order to ensure that AI is used purposefully and ethically; stresses the need to take into account the technological, regulatory and social aspects of the introduction of AI in education;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has proposed to rapidly deploy products and services that rely on AI in areas of public interest and the public sector; emphasises that in the education sector, this deployment should involve educators, learners and wider society and take their needs, especially of the most vulnerable and disadvantaged, and the expected benefits into account in order to ensure that AI is used purposefully, lawfully and ethically;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has proposed to rapidly deploy products and services that rely on AI in areas of public interest and the public sector; emphasises that in the education sector, this deployment should involve educators, parents, learners and wider society and take their needs and the expected benefits into account in order to ensure that AI is used purposefully and ethically;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has proposed to rapidly deploy products and services that rely on AI in areas of public interest and the public sector; emphasises that in the education sector, this deployment should involve educators, learners, schoolchildren and students and wider society and take their needs and the expected benefits into account in order to ensure that AI is used purposefully and ethically;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has proposed to rapidly deploy products and services that rely on AI in areas of public interest and the public sector; emphasises that in the education sector, th
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has proposed to rapidly deploy products and services that rely on AI in areas of public interest and the public sector; emphasises that in the education sector, this deployment should involve educators, teachers, learners and wider society and take their needs and the expected benefits into account in order to ensure that AI is used purposefully and ethically;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 a (new) -1 a. Whereas AI could have practical applications in reducing the administrative work of educators and education institutions and to free up time for their core teaching and learning activities;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Welcomes the use of AI-based products in education and the potential of technology to make high-quality education available to all EU pupils, especially in sparsely populated and socio- economically vulnerable areas;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Acknowledges that although development of AI and automated decision-making processes may present challenges for consumer trust and welfare, it's a major tool that can benefit EU consumers and companies to boost the economy and the internal market; welcomes the human-centric approach of AI, as a tool to serve people with the ultimate aim of increasing well-being;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Underlines that algorithmic systems can be an enabler for reducing the digital divide in an accelerated way, but unequal deployment is of nature of creating new divides or accelerate the deepening of the existing ones; calls for measures and investments meant to ensure the cohesion and sharing of the benefits of AI and related technologies;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Stresses the importance to avoid a purely notional and sterile use of AI in education which would undermine educational bonds between pupils, students and other learners and teachers, as well as between children and parents; the human dimension of education must remain at the forefront;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that education continues to contribute to the public good and given the high sensitivity of data on pupils, students and other learners; underlines that data sets used to train AI should be reviewed to avoid
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that education continues to contribute to the public good and given the high sensitivity of data on pupils, students and other learners;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that education continues to contribute to the public good and given the high sensitivity of data on pupils, students and other learners; points out, accordingly, that appropriate conformity assessments are needed, to verify and ensure that all the provisions concerning high-risk applications are complied with, including test, inspection and certification requirements; underlines that data sets used to train AI should be reviewed, to ensure that they are reliable and accurate, to avoid reinforcing gender stereotypes and other biases based on gender, ethnic and racial origin, religion or beliefs, disability, age or sexual orientation;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the public and private education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that education continues to contribute to the public good and given the high sensitivity of data on pupils, students and other learners; underlines that data sets used to train AI should be reviewed to avoid
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 b (new) -1 b. Whereas the application of AI in education raises concerns around the ethical use of data, learners’ rights, data access, protection of personal data and therefore entails fundamental rights’ risks such as the creation of stereotyped models of learners' profiles and behaviour that could lead to discrimination or risks of doing harm by the scaling-up of bad pedagogical practices;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that education continues to contribute to the public good and given the high sensitivity of data on pupils, students and other learners; underlines that data sets used to train AI should be
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that education continues to contribute to the public good and given the high sensitivity of data on pupils, students and other learners;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that education continues to contribute to the public good and given the high sensitivity of data on pupils, students and other learners in order to promote the public good and the public well-being of society; underlines that data sets used to train AI should be reviewed to avoid reinforcing gender stereotypes and other biases;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that education continues to contribute to the public good and given the high sensitivity of data on pupils, students and other learners; underlines that data sets used to train AI should be reviewed to avoid reinforcing gender, religious, cultural and national stereotypes and other biases;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that education continues to contribute to the public good and given the high sensitivity of data on pupils, students and other learners; underlines that data sets used to train AI should be reviewed to avoid
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that education continues to contribute to the public good and given the high sensitivity
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 c (new) -1 c. Whereas AI applications are omnipresent in the audio-visual sector, in particular on audio-visual content platforms;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Points out that all children are entitled to a high-quality public education at every level; calls, therefore, for the development, deployment and use of high- quality AI systems that provide pupils at all levels with high-quality educational tools and emphasises that the deployment of new AI systems in schools should not widen the digital divide in society; calls on the Commission to examine how to implement these systems, particularly in the most vulnerable educational establishments and in depopulated areas with no or poor Internet access;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Draws the Commission's attention to the risks inherent in the use of new digital technologies in primary and secondary education, and even in preschooling; recalls that minors should be given special protection in relation to the digital content to which they are likely to be exposed, and in relation to the use that new technologies, such as artificial intelligence, may make of their personal data, especially in schools or educational activities; stresses that the use of digital resources in education has produced documented negative effects on pupils’ attention, development and capabilities; calls therefore on the Commission to limit the deployment of artificial intelligence to higher education and research in cases where learners would be liable come into contact with it;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Urges the Commission to preserve and promote the plurality of reference theories upon which to base the development of AI systems;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Underlines the importance of training highly skilled professionals in this area, including ethical aspects in their curriculums, and supporting underrepresented groups in the field; as well as creating incentives for highly skilled professionals to seek work within the European Union;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Highlights the increasing need to ensure mutual recognition of a minimum level of professional qualifications on AI skills across the EU, as several member states are upgrading their educational offer with AI-related skills and putting in place specific curricula for AI developers; stresses the need for them to be in line with the assessment list of the Ethical Guidelines for Trustworthy AI; calls on the Commission to build on its own proposal in the White Paper on AI, in order to put forward a framework in this sense;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Calls on the Commission to establish a method whereby the manufacturers of devices that use AI can control content by means of a data tag or a similar means of providing information which allows users to make free and informed decisions, given that many pupils will be minors whose access to certain unsuitable content must be restricted on account of their age;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Expresses concern over the use, in some local areas, of AI applications for remote biometric identification purposes; points out that the use of intrusive surveillance technologies, particularly in high-risk sectors such as education, may infringe fundamental rights as it implies the use of sensitive data;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Urges Member States which have not done so to modernise their education systems with a stronger emphasis on STEAM subjects in order to secure schoolchildren with the minimum necessary skills needed in an increasingly digital society;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concern that schools and other public education providers are becoming increasingly dependent on educational technology services, including AI applications, provided by just a few technology companies; stresses that this may lead to unequal access to data and limit competition by restricting consumer choice;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concern that schools and other public education providers are
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 d (new) -1 d. Whereas recommendation algorithms and personalised marketing have the potential to improve the consumers’ experience, but come with risks such as selective presentation of content based on gender or other grounds, ever more extreme content presented in order to increase the time spent on the platform and a selective presentation of news;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concern that schools and other public education providers are becoming increasingly dependent on educational technology services, including AI applications, provided by just a few technology companies; stresses that this
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concern that schools and other public education providers are becoming increasingly dependent on educational technology services, including AI applications, provided by just a few technology companies; stresses that this may lead to unequal access to data and limit competition by restricting consumer choice; calls for this data to be
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concern that schools and other public education providers are becoming increasingly dependent on educational technology services, including AI applications, provided by just a few technology companies; stresses that this may lead to unequal access to data and limit competition by restricting consumer choice; calls for this data to be shared with the relevant public authorities so it can be used in the development of curricula and pedagogical practices (in particular since these services are purchased with public money or offered to public education providers for free, and because education is a common good); stresses the importance of inclusion of multiple AI providers in order to facilitate competition and widen consumer choices; encourages open source systems in order to foster innovation and advances in the EU;
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concern that schools and other public education providers
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concern that schools and other public education providers are becoming increasingly dependent on educational technology services, including AI applications, provided by just a few technology companies; stresses that this may lead to unequal access to data and limit competition by restricting consumer choice; calls for this data to be accessible, interoperable and of high quality, and to be shared with the relevant public authorities so it can be used in the development of curricula and pedagogical practices (in particular since these services are purchased with public money or offered to public education providers for free, and because education is a common good);
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concern that schools and other public education providers are becoming increasingly dependent on educational technology services, including AI applications, provided by just a few technology companies; stresses that this may lead to further fragmentation of the internal market, unequal access to data and limit competition by restricting consumer choice; calls for this data to be shared with the relevant public authorities so it can be used in the development of curricula and pedagogical practices (in particular since these services are purchased with public money or offered to public education providers for free, and because education is a common good);
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concern that schools and other public education providers are becoming increasingly dependent on educational technology services, including AI applications, provided by just a few technology companies; stresses that this may lead to unequal access to data and limit competition by restricting consumer choice; calls for this data to be shared with the relevant public authorities, in the privacy compliant manner, so it can be used in the development of curricula and pedagogical practices (in particular since these services are purchased with public money or offered to public education providers for free, and because education is a common good);
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concern that schools and other public education providers are becoming increasingly dependent on educational technology services, including AI applications, provided by just a few technology companies; stresses that this may lead to unequal access to data and limit competition by restricting consumer choice; calls for this data to be shared with the relevant public authorities and monitored by them, so it can be used in the development of curricula and pedagogical practices (in particular since these services are purchased with public money or offered to public education providers for free, and because education is a common good);
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has proposed to rapidly deploy products and services that rely on AI in areas of public interest and the public sector; emphasises that in the education sector, this deployment should involve educators, learners and wider society and take their needs and the expected benefits into account in order to ensure that AI is used purposefully and ethically; expresses its concerns that telecommunication infrastructures in some regions across the European Union are lacking, which limits the accessibility to products and services that rely on AI and calls on the Commission to deploy sustained efforts in ameliorating telecommunication infrastructures in such regions, particularly with regards to the public education sector;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concern that schools and other public education providers are becoming increasingly dependent on educational technology services, including AI applications, provided by just a few technology companies; stresses that this may lead to unequal and insufficient access to data and limit competition by restricting consumer choice; calls for this data to be shared with the relevant public authorities so it can be
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concern that
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that the dependence created in this way on a small number of educational technology players is liable to harm many suppliers, equipment producers or participants, both in the physical resources sector and among producers of knowledge, including as regards the previous generation of IT tools; stresses that it could also lead to unfair differentials in access to data and limit competition by restricting consumer choice, as these risks also arise in the field of culture; calls for this data to be shared with the relevant public authorities so that it can be used in the development of curricula and teaching methods (in particular since these services are purchased with public money or offered to public education providers for free, and because education is a public asset);
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recalls the fundamental role played by human beings in passing on knowledge and the risk of a digital divide in access to digital educational content;
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Stresses the need for governments and educational institutions to rethink and rework educational programmes to prepare learners and consumers for the increasing presence of AI in all aspects of human activity;
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Urges the Commission to combat market practices resulting in unjustified monopolisation of data collection and restrictions on data access in the field of educational technology services; calls on the Commission to ensure fair access to data for all companies, in particular SMEs and cultural and creative companies, which play an essential role in sustaining social cohesion and cultural diversity in Europe as well as democratic values;
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Considers therefore that the use of AI in the acquisition of knowledge and skills is a tool, access to which should be made available to as many people as possible in order to avoid aggravating existing inequalities;
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of putting in place a proper framework for the public procurement of such services for the public sector, including for education providers, to ensure consumer choice and the respect of fundamental rights; stresses the need for public buyers to take into account specific criteria, such as non-discrimination and data privacy, and, specifically when purchasing services for public education providers, the involvement of educators and learners; calls for the implementation of a research and development plan for artificial intelligence focusing on education, knowledge and culture which can stop the brain drain and loss of skills from Europe; calls also for facilitation of the acquisition of cognitive skills and for the gulf that exists in our societies with regard to access to the means to acquire such skills to be reduced;
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of putting in place a proper framework for the public procurement of such services for the public sector, including for education providers,
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of putting in place a proper framework for the public procurement of such services for the public sector, including for education providers, to ensure consumer choice and the respect of fundamental rights; stresses the need for public buyers to take into account specific criteria, such as non-discrimination
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has proposed to rapidly deploy products and services that rely on AI in areas of public interest and the public sector; highlights the added value of promoting public private partnerships to secure this objective and deploy the full potential of AI in the education, culture and audiovisual sector; emphasises that in the education sector, this deployment should involve educators, learners and wider society and take their needs and the expected benefits into account in order to ensure that AI is used purposefully and ethically; points out that the legal framework governing AI in the education sector should particularly provide for legally binding measures and standards to prevent practices from the different private and public actors involved that would undermine fundamental rights and freedoms, and to ensure the development of trustworthy, ethical and technically robust AI applications;
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of
Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of putting in place a proper framework for the public procurement of such services for the public sector, including for education providers, creating level and fair playing field among AI solution providers to ensure consumer choice and the respect of fundamental rights; stresses the need for public buyers to take into account specific criteria, such as non-discrimination and data privacy, and, specifically when purchasing services for public education providers, the involvement of educators and learners;
Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of putting in place a proper framework for the public procurement of such services for the public sector, including for education providers, to ensure maximum transparency, consumer choice and the respect of fundamental rights; stresses the need for public buyers to take into account specific criteria, such as non-discrimination, environmental sustainability and data privacy, and, specifically when purchasing services for public education providers, the involvement of educators and learners;
Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of putting in place a proper framework for the public procurement of such services for the public sector, including for education providers, to ensure consumer choice and the respect of fundamental rights; stresses the need for public buyers to take into account specific criteria, such as non-discrimination
Amendment 76 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of putting in place a proper framework for the public procurement of such services for the public sector, including for education providers, to ensure consumer choice and the respect of fundamental rights; stresses the need for public buyers to take into account specific criteria, such as diversity, non- discrimination and data privacy, and, specifically when purchasing services for public education providers, the involvement of educators and learners;
Amendment 77 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Recalls the importance of promoting, encouraging and supporting in a tailored and inclusive manner a level of media, digital and information literacy that enables the competent and critical consideration of and use of algorithmic systems;
Amendment 79 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Encourages the establishment of guidelines for AI public procurement in order to ensure accountability, transparency and sustainability;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has proposed to rapidly deploy products and services that rely on AI in areas of public interest and the public sector; emphasises that in the education sector, this deployment should involve educators, learners and wider society and take their needs and the expected benefits into account in order to ensure that AI is used purposefully and ethically; stresses the importance of this deployment for reskilling and upskilling the European labour market, and particularly those of the culture and audiovisual sectors, which will be severely impacted by the COVID crisis;
Amendment 80 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 81 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 82 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines the unreliability of the current automated means of removing illegal content from online platforms on which audiovisual content is shared; calls for a ban on generalised moderation and automated content filters; stresses the key requirements of AI applications such as accountability including auditability and reporting of negative impacts; emphasizes that transparency should also include traceability and explainability of the relevant systems; reminds, that AI applications must adhere to internal and external safety protocols which should be technically accurate and robust in nature; this should extend to operation in normal, unknown and unpredictable situations alike;
Amendment 83 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines the unreliability of the current automated means of removing illegal content from online platforms on which audiovisual content is shared
Amendment 84 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines th
Amendment 85 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines th
Amendment 86 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines th
Amendment 87 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 88 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 89 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines the
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has proposed to rapidly deploy products and services that rely on AI in areas of public interest and the public sector; emphasises that in the education sector, this deployment should involve educators, learners and wider society and take their needs and the expected benefits into account in order to ensure that AI is used purposefully and ethically and leads towards improving and benefiting the public sector; recognizes the need to integrate digital tools, services and products such as robotics and machine learning; recognises that children are vulnerable group in terms of influencing their behaviour; emphasises that AI applications in the education sector must be applied reasonably with adequate safeguards and human-centric approach;
Amendment 90 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines the unreliability of the current automated means of removing illegal content from online platforms on which audiovisual content is shared;
Amendment 91 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines the
Amendment 92 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines the unreliability of the current automated means of removing illegal content from online platforms on which audiovisual content is shared;
Amendment 93 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines the unreliability of the current automated means of removing illegal
Amendment 94 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines the unreliability of the current automated means of removing illegal content from online platforms on which audiovisual content is shared; calls for a ban on generalised moderation and automated content filters to prevent the dissemination of illegal content on online platforms;
Amendment 95 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 96 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Calls for a level playing field and fair balance between audiovisual service providers and online platforms;
Amendment 97 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Stresses the importance of the human oversight on the deployment of AI technologies in order to guarantee the respect of the human rights, ethical principles and correct use of algorithms to avoid unfair bias; recalls that EU funding should in particular support AI solutions that are in line with the Ethics Guidelines;
Amendment 98 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for recommendation algorithms and personalised marketing on audiovisual platforms, including video streaming platforms and news platforms, to be transparent, in order to give consumers insight into these processes and ensure that personalised services are not discriminatory; stresses the need to guarantee and properly implement the right of users to opt out from recommended and personalised services
Amendment 99 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for recommendation algorithms and personalised marketing on audiovisual platforms, including video streaming platforms and news platforms, to be transparent, in order to give consumers insight into these processes and ensure that personalised services are not
source: 650.362
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
2021-03-27Show (7) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373&secondRef=02 |
events/2 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
2021-03-16Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373 |
2021-03-05Show (5) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839&secondRef=02 |
forecasts/0/date |
Old
2021-03-16T00:00:00New
2021-03-15T00:00:00 |
forecasts/1/date |
Old
2021-04-26T00:00:00New
2021-05-17T00:00:00 |
2021-03-03Show (8) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
2021-02-24Show (8) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
2021-02-17Show (8) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
2021-02-16Show (15) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3/rapporteur/0/mepref |
118949
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370&secondRef=03 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373&secondRef=02 |
forecasts/0/date |
Old
2021-02-25T00:00:00New
2021-03-16T00:00:00 |
forecasts/1/date |
Old
2021-03-24T00:00:00New
2021-04-26T00:00:00 |
2020-12-09Show (8) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
197870
|
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
124873
|
committees/3/rapporteur/0/mepref |
118949
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839&secondRef=02 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373 |
2020-11-23Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
forecasts/0/date |
Old
2020-12-03T00:00:00New
2021-02-25T00:00:00 |
forecasts/1/date |
Old
2021-01-18T00:00:00New
2021-03-24T00:00:00 |
2020-11-01Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370&secondRef=03 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373&secondRef=02 |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE658.907
|
2020-10-09Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839&secondRef=02 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373 |
docs/5 |
|
2020-10-08Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373&secondRef=02 |
2020-09-29Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839&secondRef=02 |
2020-09-27Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839 |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
2020-09-14Show (5) Changes | Timetravel
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370&secondRef=03 |
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/date |
Old
2020-09-11T00:00:00New
2020-09-14T00:00:00 |
2020-09-12Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370 |
2020-09-11Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/3 |
|
2020-09-08Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02 |
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/1 |
|
forecasts/1/date |
Old
2020-10-19T00:00:00New
2021-01-18T00:00:00 |
2020-09-07Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349 |
2020-09-04Show (5) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370&secondRef=03 |
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/1 |
|
forecasts/1/date |
Old
2020-10-01T00:00:00New
2020-12-03T00:00:00 |
2020-09-01Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370 |
2020-08-27Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370&secondRef=03 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE655.862
|
2020-08-18Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349 |
2020-08-06Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370 |
2020-07-31Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/2 |
|
2020-07-27Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370&secondRef=03 |
2020-07-23Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349 |
docs/1 |
|
2020-07-21Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02 |
2020-07-17Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349 |
2020-07-15Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02 |
2020-07-07Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349 |
2020-07-06Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs |
|
2020-06-16Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/1 |
|
forecasts/1/date |
Old
2020-09-14T00:00:00New
2020-10-19T00:00:00 |
2020-05-01Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/1 |
|
forecasts/1/date |
Old
2020-07-15T00:00:00New
2020-10-01T00:00:00 |
2020-03-20Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
forecasts/0/date |
Old
2020-06-23T00:00:00New
2020-07-15T00:00:00 |
2020-02-24Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
2020-02-18Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
2020-01-27Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
2020-01-24Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
2020-01-22Show (1) Changes
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|