Next event: Debate in plenary scheduled 2021/03/24 more...
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading 2021/03/03
- Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading 2021/02/25
- Committee opinion 2020/12/04
- Amendments tabled in committee 2020/11/10
- Committee opinion 2020/10/29
- Committee draft report 2020/10/12
Progress: Awaiting Parliament's vote
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | TRAN | MONTEIRO DE AGUIAR Cláudia ( EPP) | UJHELYI István ( S&D), DANTI Nicola ( Renew), METZ Tilly ( Verts/ALE), CASANOVA Massimo ( ID), FIDANZA Carlo ( ECR), KOUNTOURA Elena ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | AGRI | MORTLER Marlene ( EPP) | Mara BIZZOTTO ( ID), Giuseppe FERRANDINO ( S&D), Ruža TOMAŠIĆ ( ECR), Anna DEPARNAY-GRUNENBERG ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | CULT | MELBĀRDE Dace ( ECR) | Pernando BARRENA ARZA ( GUE/NGL), Salima YENBOU ( Verts/ALE), Isabel BENJUMEA BENJUMEA ( PPE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the own-initiative report by Cláudia MONTEIRO DE AGUIAR (EPP, PT) on establishing an EU strategy for sustainable tourism.
Restrictions on travel introduced in response to the pandemic continue to hit global and European tourism hard, with the latest data from the UN World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) showing a 70 % fall in international tourism arrivals in 2020.
COVID-19 impact response plans
Members stressed that the COVID-19 outbreak has paralysed the EU tourism sector, putting its ecosystem under unprecedented pressure. Continued short-term financial support is essential to the survival of the sector, especially in light of the second and third wave of the pandemic.
The current crisis should lead the Commission and Member States to fully acknowledge the importance of the tourism industry, to fully integrate it into European and national development plans, to enhance the quality of its offer, to make it more sustainable and accessible for all, and to launch long-overdue public and private investment in the digitalisation and overall modernisation of the sector.
Common coordinated criteria
Members called on Member States to fully implement, without delay, common and coordinated criteria for safe travel, while facilitating the deployment of the EU Passenger Locator Form, digitally where possible, with full respect for data protection rules. They stressed the importance of voluntary, interoperable and anonymised tracking, tracing and warning apps, making use of the Commission’s interoperability gateway, with none of the data used for other purposes, such as commercial or law enforcement purposes, and of setting common hygiene criteria at the main transport hubs.
Member States are called on to establish a common and non-discriminatory EU Health Safety Protocol for testing before departure, which should be reliable and affordable, including rapid testing technologies, PCR tests and others.
The report urged that quarantine should remain an instrument of last resort, but where applicable, its duration should be reduced to a minimum number of days, which should be harmonised throughout the EU.
Common vaccination certificate
Members called on the Member States to develop as a matter of priority a common vaccination certificate and a system of mutual recognition of vaccination procedures for medical purposes, which should be rolled out in parallel with the distribution of vaccines, while preserving individuals’ rights to privacy and data protection. Once vaccines have been made available to the general public and there is sufficient scientific evidence that vaccinated persons do not transmit the virus, the certificate could be considered for travel purposes as an alternative to PCR tests and quarantine requirements, while retaining the need to respect current sanitary measures, such as wearing face masks in public and observing social distancing.
The report stressed that it is necessary and important to re-establish freedom of movement in the EU and ensure a gradual return to normality for the transport and tourism sectors. Members also welcomed ‘Re-open EU’ portal and urged EU countries to send clear information on the application or lifting of future restrictions on free movement to the Commission.
EU hygiene certification
The resolution also urged the Commission to introduce the EU hygiene certification seal, which could certify minimum COVID-19 virus prevention and control standards and could help to restore consumer’s trust in tourism and travel sectors.
Financial assistance
Members called on the Commission to encourage Member States to temporarily set reduced VAT rates on travel and tourism services, accompanied by a special stimulus package for all micro enterprises and SMEs for the 2020-2024 period, to minimise the number of bankruptcies and preserve jobs and workers’ rights in the European tourism industry, while utilising investments to foster the transition towards a more digital and sustainable tourism ecosystem.
European Agency for tourism
The report called on the Commission to set up a European Agency for Tourism in the next MFF and to devise a short-term solution by creating a tourism department in one of the existing executive agencies, in particular the Executive Agency for SMEs (EASME) or the upcoming Health and Digital Executive Agency.
Sustainable, responsible and smart tourism
Members called for the swift development of a roadmap for sustainable tourism that includes innovative measures to reduce the climate and environmental footprint of the sector by developing more sustainable forms of tourism, diversifying the offer, boosting new initiatives for cooperation and developing new digital services.
Sustainable tourism action plans at national and regional level should be devised and full use should be made of the Next Generation EU funds to finance the tourism transition action plans.
Documents
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0033/2021
- Committee opinion: PE652.559
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE660.207
- Committee opinion: PE648.598
- Committee draft report: PE657.187
- Committee draft report: PE657.187
- Committee opinion: PE648.598
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE660.207
- Committee opinion: PE652.559
Activities
- Cláudia MONTEIRO DE AGUIAR
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Julie LECHANTEUX
Plenary Speeches (0)
Amendments | Dossier |
79 |
2020/2038(INI)
2020/05/04
CULT
79 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Stresses the impact of the COVID- 19 crisis on existing business models in the tourism sector, the changes in market and tourists' motivation and behaviour, and the removal of physical barriers between culture and art and citizens;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recognises that cultural tourism has significant potential to generate growth and jobs in the EU, with as many as four in ten tourists already choosing their destination on the basis of its cultural offering; recalls the role of the EAFRD and more particularly the LEADER programme;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Highlights the need to help the Member States to promote entrepreneurial spirit in the tourism sector and related industries (such as leisure and entertainment) through the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF), as such companies are a powerful way to disseminate European cultural values, promote historical heritage and bring people closer to natural resources; believes that citizens are the best ambassadors for history, cultural wealth and regional traditions; reiterates that tourism training and upskilling programmes need to be developed, particularly in rural areas;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. States that tourism needs to be developed in conjunction with all local stakeholders and everyone living in the areas concerned; considers that a long- term outlook is absolutely necessary in developing tourism, as are efforts to achieve the EU’s 2050 climate goals, while successfully combating inequalities and boosting social inclusion; stresses that people are to be placed at the heart of this growth in order to guarantee the creation of decent and sustainable jobs that benefit the whole of society and help make it resilient;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. 1. Recognises the role of the local community and their environmental, cultural and economic impact in the development of sustainable tourism; calls for the promotion of cultural community ‘ownership’ and capacity building to improve local inclusion and the participation in cultural protection;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Reiterates the liaison between sustainable tourism and the restoration, preservation and promotion of cultural heritage both tangible and intangible, natural, man-made or mixed and the potential that this would untap for rural areas and local economies of member states;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Believes that cultural tourism can act as catalyst for strengthening the mutual understanding of European citizens by allowing them to discover the differences but also the shared values underpinning an European cultural heritage that is more than the sum of its parts;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that the existence of cultural heritage sites encourages people to travel and learn about different societies and cultures; recalls that 72 % of a survey group aged between 15-24 agree that the presence of cultural heritage can have an influence on their choice of holiday destination;
Amendment 17 #
3. Points out that the existence of cultural heritage sites encourages people to travel and learn about different societies and cultures; recalls that 72 % of a survey group aged between 15-24 agree that the presence of cultural heritage can have an influence on their choice of holiday destination; highlights the role that the DiscoverEU initiative can play in this regard;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that the existence of cultural heritage sites encourages people to travel and learn about different societies and cultures; recalls that 72 % of a survey group aged between 15-24 agree that the presence of cultural heritage can have an influence on their choice of holiday destination; highlights the role that the DiscoverEU initiative can play in this regard;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that the existence of cultural heritage sites encourages people to travel and learn about different societies and cultures; recalls that
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 a (new) -1a. Stresses the sector's resilience during the COVID-19 crisis and welcomes the emerging digital cultural tourism offerings, such as online museum tours and virtual guided tours of European cities; deplores, however, the economic impact on the sector and calls on the Commission to provide special support for cultural activities and heritage as a necessary basis for the cultural tourism sector to recover; calls for measures to be taken to speed up the digital transformation of this industry, for the tools needed for the industry to prepare for future scenarios to be provided, for public-private collaboration in initiatives to be encouraged and for SMEs' access to the market to be facilitated;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that the existence of
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that the existence of cultural heritage sites encourages people to travel and learn about different societies and cultures; recalls that 72 % of a survey group aged between 15-24 agree that the presence of cultural heritage can have an influence on their choice of holiday destination; highlights the role that the DiscoverEU initiative can play in this regard; notes, however, that the initiative has not benefited young people equally; calls on the Commission to find ways to better involve young people from socially disadvantaged backgrounds, from rural, mountain and remote areas of the Member States, and from Member States without good rail
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Points out that Erasmus+ programmes and the European Solidarity Corps are an opportunity to preserve the EU's cultural values; believes that these programmes foster intra-European tourism and cultural exchanges, enable connectivity and create links between travellers;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Strongly believes that professional tourist guides play a vital role in promoting cultural heritage throughout the member states and therefore calls member states to ensure that their profession is properly recognized and enjoys adequate protection in the labour market;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Member States to further p
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Member States to further promote sustainable cultural tourism, paying particular attention to local economies,
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Member States to further promote sustainable cultural tourism, paying particular attention to local economies, lifestyles and traditions and ensuring that local industries (particularly SMEs) and communities are closely involved;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Member States to further promote sustainable cultural tourism, paying particular attention to local economies, lifestyles and traditions and ensuring that local industries and communities are closely involved; considers that support measures should be put forward for those regions in need to transition towards sustainable tourism models;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Member States to further promote sustainable cultural tourism, paying particular attention to local economies, lifestyles and traditions and ensuring that local industries and communities are closely involved; stresses the role of the Cohesion Funds, and in particular the ERDF, in preserving and promoting the cultural heritage, by making it possible to fund alternative tourism using new digital means and construction techniques where sites are too fragile to be visited;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Advocates an inclusive view of tourism and acknowledges the need to strike a balance between economic, social, cultural and environmental needs in order to comprehensively ensure the long-term sustainability of tourism;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Encourages the promotion of excellent sustainable cultural tourism; calls on the Commission and the Member States to take measures to foster collaboration between prestigious experts with accredited active knowledge in cultural tourism, and to promote cooperation and the exchange of good practices in the cultural tourism industry;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Believes that tour operators can and must play an increasing role in promoting sustainable tourism by, inter alia, encouraging customers to reduce their waste, promoting sustainable activities and educating them about the places they are visiting, especially the value and protection of cultural heritage;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Call on the European Commission to launch a new updated digitalized version of the European Cultural Routes that have a high potential for small businesses, intercultural dialogue and promote the image of a United Europe;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Highlights the need for a strategy on sustainable tourism that will include robust supportive and recovery measures for the sector that was vastly hit by the measures against the pandemic of COVID-19;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to encourage and support the use of digital tools in the cultural tourism sector;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Reiterates the positive impact of cultural and creative industries in the promotion of sustainable tourism and call on the European Commission to further assess ways to support them;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Takes the view that a holistic approach to sustainable cultural tourism must include engagement with tourism operators, civil society networks and greater cooperation between the Member States and local authorities by introducing appropriate strategies and policies at all levels;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Takes the view that a holistic approach to sustainable cultural tourism
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Believes that pan-European or European cultural events and festivals with periodicity and the view to reignite and raise awareness on the significance of European culture present an added value for sustainable tourism purposes; urges the Commission to consider financing such initiatives;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses the importance for the European tourism industry of nurturing and keeping active tourism flows between the EU and the UK following the end of the transition period, once the threat posed by COVID-19 has subsided;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Acknowledges the need to strike a balance between the sustainable conservation of cultural heritage and the economic, social, cultural and environmental needs in order to comprehensively ensure the long-term sustainability of tourism;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Insists on the need, without prejudice to the principle of subsidiarity, to promote and supplement the capacities of the Member States in education and training in the field of sustainable and responsible tourism;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Insists on the need, without prejudice to the principle of subsidiarity, to develop, promote and supplement the capacities of the Member States in education and training in the field of sustainable tourism;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Insists on the need, without prejudice to the principle of subsidiarity, to
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Recognises the key role played by the European Capitals of Culture in the promotion of cities and regions, as, by setting their cultural, artistic and social projects within an economic framework, they integrate therein sustainable tourism concepts and enhance their tangible and intangible heritage, traditions and innovations, for the benefit and appreciation of the whole of the public in Europe and beyond;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Highlights the potential of the digitisation of cultural heritage, both as a source for education and research opportunities and as a tool for the improved preservation and of cultural heritage sites, the creation of quality jobs, better social inclusion, wider access for disabled people or people living in remote areas, and sustainable economic development;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Believes that certain aspects of Sustainable Tourism can play a fundamental role in highlighting the European elements of culture, such as cultural and traditional routes which can act as elements of protection and heritage management, as well as basis for solid transnational cooperation;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Points out that the cultural education of today’s youth shapes the foundation of good quality tourism; calls for the investment in educational programs to raise the importance of cultural heritage protection; calls for the active involvement of younger generations in the development of sustainable tourism by raising the awareness of the importance of heritage diversity, its conservation, enhancement and transmission; encourages engagement through volunteering activities via programs such as the European Solidarity Corps;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Stresses the need for action to limit the effects of climate change and natural disasters on cultural heritage; calls, in this respect, for appropriate prevention and adaptation measures to be defined and for knowledge-sharing between the Member States to be improved;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Calls to take into account the lessons learnt of the European Year of Cultural Heritage; recalls that many initiatives have been taken on European, national and local level to improve sustainable tourism by the integration of cultural heritage into environmental, architectural and planning policies;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Is concerned about the
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Acknowledges the need to strike a balance between economic, social, cultural and environmental needs in order to comprehensively ensure the mid-term and long-term sustainability of tourism;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Is concerned about the impact on cultural heritage sites of poorly managed tourism
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Is concerned about the impact on cultural heritage sites of poorly managed unsustainable tourism flows and uncontrolled development; calls on the Commission to propose concrete measures to preserve and protect cultural heritage in the light of these human-made hazards;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Is concerned about the impact on cultural heritage and environmental sites of poorly managed tourism and uncontrolled development; calls on the Commission to propose concrete measures to preserve and protect cultural heritage in the light of these human-made hazards;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Is concerned about the impact on cultural heritage sites of poorly managed tourism and uncontrolled development; calls on the Commission to propose concrete measures to preserve and protect cultural heritage in the light of these human-made hazards; points out that any reflection on sustainable tourism needs also to take a fresh look at works that were looted and stolen during wars and the waves of colonisation; calls on the Commission and the Member States to work in a coordinated manner to facilitate the restitution of cultural goods that were unlawfully removed from their country of origin;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Is concerned about the impact on cultural heritage sites of poorly managed tourism and uncontrolled development; is further concerned that due to COVID-19 outbreak and the associated economic downturn which may have an impact on funding for culture both at national and the EU level, the protection of cultural heritage from, inter alia, human-made hazards may be seriously undermined; calls on the Commission to propose concrete measures to preserve and protect cultural heritage in the light of the
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Is concerned about the impact on cultural heritage sites of poorly managed tourism and uncontrolled development; calls on the Commission to propose concrete measures to preserve and protect cultural heritage in the light of these human-made hazards; calls for the most endangered European cultural sites to be identified at EU level in order to provide them with greater protection and adequate funding;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Is concerned about the impact on cultural heritage sites of poorly managed tourism and uncontrolled development; calls on the Commission to propose concrete measures to preserve and protect cultural heritage in the light of these human-made hazards; underlines the importance of EU funds in the protection of cultural heritage sites;
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Note that within cultural tourism, different types of tourism can be distinguished, such as historical tourism (material and immaterial heritage), gastronomic tourism, literary tourism, film tourism, and even music tourism (festivals and concerts); therefore, the Member States must propose measures in favour of sustainable tourism appropriate to each type;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Highlights the important role European initiatives can play in encouraging travel to less well-known and less popular destinations and rural areas and low-season travel so as to promote sustainability and a
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Highlights the important role that European initiatives
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Acknowledges the need to strike a balance between economic, social, cultural and environmental needs in order to comprehensively ensure the long-term sustainability of tourism; stresses the need to study the resilience of cultural heritage;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Highlights the important role education and promotion of European initiatives can play in discovering and encouraging travel to less marketed, less well-known and less popular destinations
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Highlights the important role European initiatives can play in encouraging travel to less well-known and less popular destinations and rural areas and low-season travel so as to promote sustainability and accessibility in tourism, especially for persons with disabilities or elderly persons.
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Highlights the important role European initiatives can play in encouraging travel to less well-known and less popular destinations and rural and mountain areas and low-season travel so as to promote sustainability and accessibility in tourism, especially for persons with disabilities.
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Highlights the important role European initiatives can play in encouraging travel to less well-known and less popular destinations and rural areas
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Highlights the important role European initiatives can play in encouraging travel to less well-known and less popular destinations and rural areas and low-season travel so as to promote sustainability, responsibility and accessibility in tourism, especially for persons with disabilities; welcomes the European Smart Tourism Awards with explicit award categories for accessibility, sustainability, digitalisation as well as cultural heritage and creativity, thus also helping to facilitate exchange of best practices in cultural heritage protection.
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Highlights the important role European initiatives can play in encouraging travel to less well-known and less popular destinations and rural areas and low-season travel so as to promote sustainability and accessibility in tourism, especially for persons with disabilities; calls on the European Commission to further support the development of cultural tourism initiatives in those areas where the potential is not used enough.
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses that cultural tourism and events are among the hardest hit during the Covid-19 pandemic due to travel restrictions, the closure of cultural sites and the collective nature of many tourism and cultural initiatives; calls on the European Commission for a throughout analysis of the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on cultural tourism; stresses the need to include tourism as a priority area in the future EU recovery plan; notes that particular attention should be paid to countries where tourism is a strategic industry and to less well-known and less popular destinations, rural areas, islands and outermost regions;
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Promote and guarantee accessibility in tourism to all sectors of the population, especially those most vulnerable sectors such as the elderly or disabled;
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Recognises the role of the collaborative economy in the tourism sector and welcomes the conclusion of an agreement between the Commission and the collaborative economy platforms to publish key data on tourism accommodation; calls on the Commission and the Member States to collaborate more with the platforms so as to have access to anonymised data in order to better understand the development of the collaborative economy, support policies based on factual data and develop sustainable tourism by achieving a balance between transparency and protection of privacy1 a; _________________ 1a https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscor ner/detail/en/ip_20_194
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses the importance of promoting environmentally respectful initiatives to protect, develop and enhance the industrial heritage of the regions in transition, namely coal regions in transition, to open up new economic and professional opportunities in those areas;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recognises that cultural tourism has significant potential to generate growth and jobs in the EU, with as many as four in ten tourists already choosing their destination on the basis of its cultural offering; stresses, in this regard, that some cultural destinations see excessive and often unmanageable numbers of tourists, surpassing their reception capacities and putting cultural heritage at risk and often undermining local lifestyles and traditions; highlights, meanwhile, that other regions in Europe with rich cultural offering still have underdeveloped tourism sectors; believes that developing and promoting tourism in such regions would not only broaden the choice for people seeking new destinations and experiences, but could also help reduce tourist flows to excessively visited and popular sites and locations as well as help lessen the socioeconomic inequalities between various regions and Member States;
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses that the impact of COVID-19 may result in a dramatic change in tourists’ destination choices and in the emergence of new opportunities for the tourist industry; in this context, stresses the importance of promoting a shift from mass tourism to other forms of cultural and sustainable tourism;
Amendment 71 #
8a. Considers that Cultural Routes of the Council of Europe programme help highlighting diverse European history and promoting cultural heritage; believes that the programme must evolve by increasingly advocating for sustainability in tourism, including protection for cultural heritage;
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses the important role of cyclo-tourism, as an example of sustainable tourism which makes it possible to strike a balance between preserving the environment and the economic development of local communities, ensuring the long-term sustainability of tourism;
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Stresses that a balance needs to be achieved between expanding the tourism sector and protecting cultural heritage, having in mind the restoration, conservation and protection of archaeological and historic sites and monuments; urges the Commission and Member States to increase conservation efforts of cultural heritage sites;
Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Calls for European funds, within the framework of the Coronavirus Response Investment Initiative, to be mobilised to relaunch sustainable tourism and responsible territorial marketing in the regions hardest hit by the partial or total shutdown of the tourism sector, due to the COVID-19 crisis;
Amendment 76 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Stresses the importance of connecting tourist attractions in order to establish tourist trails on a European, national and local scale;
Amendment 77 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 d (new) 8d. Highlights the importance of improving accessibility to cultural heritage sites and cultural education, while taking into account, the needs of people with disabilities when constructing, renovating or extending tourist attractions;
Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 e (new) Amendment 79 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 f (new) 8f. Points to the opportunities provided by new technologies and the digitisation of cultural heritage in the promotion of tourism and the potential to further modernise and develop the tourism industry; stresses at the same the importance in preserving traditional forms of promoting cultural tourism;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recognises that cultural tourism has significant potential to generate growth and jobs in the EU, with as many as four in ten tourists already choosing their destination on the basis of its cultural offering; notes, however, that cultural heritage offerings only recoup a minimal share of the economic value they generate, requiring thus new, alternative and stable sources of funding to continue to serve as the basis for sustainable tourism;
Amendment 9 #
2. Recognises that cultural tourism has significant potential to generate growth and jobs in the EU, with as many as four in ten tourists already choosing their destination on the basis of its cultural offering; notes, however, that cultural offerings only recoup a minimal share of the economic value they generate, requiring thus new, alternative and stable sources of funding to continue to act as catalysers of sustainable tourism;
source: 650.485
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.559New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.559&secondRef=02 |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
forecasts/0/title |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
events/2 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.598New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.598&secondRef=02 |
events/1 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.559&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.559 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.598&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.598 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.559New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.559&secondRef=02 |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.559&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.559 |
forecasts |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
197427
|
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
130256
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE660.207
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.598New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.598&secondRef=02 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.598&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.598 |
docs/2 |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.598New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.598&secondRef=02 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.598&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.598 |
docs/1 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE657.187
|
docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
committees/0/shadows/0 |
|