Progress: Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | ENVI |
HANSEN Christophe (![]() |
BURKHARDT Delara (![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Committee Opinion | IMCO |
CAVAZZINI Anna (![]() |
Adam BIELAN (![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Committee Opinion | INTA |
KARLSBRO Karin (![]() |
Heidi HAUTALA (![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Committee Opinion | DEVE |
ESTARÀS FERRAGUT Rosa (![]() |
Dominique BILDE (![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Committee Opinion | AGRI |
LINS Norbert (![]() |
Clara AGUILERA (![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 57, TFEU 192
Legal Basis:
RoP 57, TFEU 192Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 453 votes to 57, with 123 abstentions, amendments to the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on making available on the Union market as well as export from the Union of certain commodities and products associated with deforestation and forest degradation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 995/2010.
The matter was referred to the committee responsible for inter-institutional negotiations.
The main amendments adopted in plenary are as follows:
Broadening the scope
While the Commission proposal covers cattle, cocoa, coffee, palm oil, soya and wood, including products that contain, have been fed with or made from these products, Parliament also wants to include swine, sheep and goats, poultry, maize and rubber, as well as charcoal and printed paper products .
Members defined ‘zero deforestation’ as goods produced on land that has not been deforested or degraded after 31 December 2019 , one year earlier than the Commission proposes.
The Commission should:
- present, no later than one year after the date of entry into force of the regulation, an impact assessment accompanied, if appropriate, by a legislative proposal to extend the scope of the regulation to other natural ecosystems , including land with a high carbon stock and land with a high biodiversity value, such as grasslands, peatlands and wetlands, in addition to forests and other wooded land;
- assess, no later than two years after entry into force, whether the rules should be extended to other commodities such as sugar cane, ethanol and mining products , and to what extent this is feasible.
Provision of financial services
Members included a new article stipulating that financial institutions should provide financial services to customers only when the financial institutions conclude that there is no more than a negligible risk that the services in question potentially provide support directly or indirectly to activities leading to deforestation, forest degradation or forest conversion.
Due diligence obligations of operators
Companies placing products on the EU market would be required to carry out due diligence to assess the risks in their supply chain.
Operators should make a due diligence statement available to the competent authorities before placing the commodities and products concerned on the EU market or exporting them. The statement, which should be transmitted and certified electronically , should confirm that due diligence has been carried out, disclose the steps that have been taken in this regard to verify the compliance of the relevant commodities and products concerned with the Regulation and explain why the assessment found no or negligible risk.
The operator should assume responsibility for the compliance of the relevant commodity or product with the requirements of this Regulation. Operators should therefore undertake reasonable, documented efforts to support the compliance of smallholders with the provisions and requirements set out in this Regulation. They should keep record of the due diligence statements for 5 years from the date of making available via the information system and share the due diligence statements with subsequent operators and traders in the supply chain.
Operators should also: (i) engage meaningfully with vulnerable stakeholders , such as smallholders, indigenous peoples and local communities, in their supply chain; (ii) ensure that those vulnerable stakeholders receive adequate assistance and fair remuneration so that their commodities and products can comply with the rules.
Human rights and indigenous peoples
Members also wanted companies to ensure that goods are produced in accordance with human rights provisions in international law and with respect for indigenous peoples. Operators should:
- collect adequate and verifiable information disclosing the views of any indigenous peoples, local communities and other groups that claim tenure rights in respect of the area used for the purpose of producing the relevant commodities and products regarding the production of those relevant commodities and products;
- ensure, where relevant, that risk assessments and mitigation measures are adopted which provide for the participation and consultation of indigenous peoples, local communities, and other customary tenure rights holders that are present in the area of production of the relevant commodities and products.
Country monitoring and assessment
Members believe that the Commission should classify countries, following a transparent and objective assessment process, as low, standard or high risk , within six months of the proposed regulation coming into force.
Each Member State should ensure that the annual checks carried out by their competent authorities cover at least 10 % of the operators placing, making available on or exporting from the Union market each of the relevant commodities and products on their market as well as 10 % of the quantity of each of the relevant commodities and products placed or made available on or exported from their market. Where commodities have been produced in a country identified as high risk, annual checks should cover at least 20% of operators. For commodities from countries considered low risk, Member States could reduce annual checks to 5% .
Satellite imagery and access to forest data
The Commission should establish a platform using satellite imagery, including Copernicus Sentinel, that covers forest areas worldwide and is accompanied by a range of tools to enable all parties to quickly move towards no-deforestation supply chains.
Guidelines
No later than one year after the entry into force of the Regulation, the Commission should issue user-friendly commodity-specific guidelines to clarify due diligence responsibilities and traceability rules of operators that are tailored to fit their respective supply chains.
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted the report by Christophe HANSEN (EPP, LU) on the REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on making available on the Union market as well as export from the Union of certain commodities and products associated with deforestation and forest degradation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 995/2010.
The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
Subject matter and enlarged scope
This proposal lays down rules regarding the placing and making available on the Union market, as well as the export from the Union market, of cattle, cocoa, coffee, oil palm, soya and wood (relevant commodities) and products, as listed in Annex I, that contain, have been fed with or have been made using relevant commodities (relevant products), with a view to minimising the Union’s contribution to deforestation, forest degradation and forest conversion worldwide and contributing to a reduction in global deforestation.
The report also stipulated that the proposed Regulation should also lay down obligations for financial institutions headquartered or operating in the Union that provide financial services to natural or legal persons whose economic activities consist, or are linked to, the production, supply, placing on or export from the Union market of the relevant commodities and products.
As regards the scope , Members want to include pigmeat, sheep and goats, poultry, maize and rubber, as well as charcoal and printed paper products, and bring the cut-off date one year forward, to 31 December 2019.
The report called on the Commission to evaluate, no later than two years after the entry into force, whether the rules need to be extended to other goods such as sugar cane, ethanol and mining products , and how feasible this is. Members also wanted them to cover other natural ecosystems such as grasslands, peatlands and wetlands, if deemed appropriate by the Commission, within one year after the entry into force.
Prohibition
Members included a new article stipulating that financial institutions should provide financial services to customers only when the financial institutions conclude that there is no more than a negligible risk that the services in question potentially provide support directly or indirectly to activities leading to deforestation, forest degradation or forest conversion.
Due diligence obligations of operators
While no country or commodity will be banned, companies placing products on the EU market would be obliged to exercise due diligence to evaluate risks in their supply chain. This due diligence information, which will be provided in a harmonised and digital manner via a due diligence statement, will then be passed on to the other operators and traders in the supply chain. They can for example use satellite monitoring tools, field audits, capacity building of suppliers or isotope testing to check where products come from. EU authorities would have access to relevant information, such as geographic coordinates. Anonymised data would be available to the public.
The operator assumes responsibility for the compliance of the relevant commodity or product with the requirements of this Regulation. Operators should therefore undertake reasonable, documented efforts to support the compliance of smallholders with the provisions and requirements set out in this Regulation. They should keep record of the due diligence statements for 5 years from the date of making available via the ‘Register’ Information System and share the due diligence statements with subsequent operators and traders in the supply chain.
Due diligence should also be strengthened to consider international human rights and the rights of indigenous people .
Checks and assessment of countries
Members considered that the Commission should classify countries, following a transparent and objective assessment process, into low, standard or high risk within six months of entry into force of the proposed Regulation.
Each Member State should ensure that the annual checks carried out by their competent authorities cover at least 10 % of the operators placing, making available on or exporting from the Union market each of the relevant commodities and products on their market as well as 10 % of the quantity of each of the relevant commodities and products placed or made available on or exported from their market. For commodities or products from countries or parts thereof categorised as low-risk, Member States should reduce the annual checks to 5 % .
PURPOSE: to curb deforestation and forest degradation that is provoked by EU consumption and production.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: deforestation and forest degradation are taking place at an alarming rate. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations estimates that 420 million hectares of forest – about 10% of the world’s remaining forests and an area larger than the European Union – have been lost worldwide between 1990 and 2020. In addition, deforestation and forest degradation contribute to the global climate crisis in multiple ways. Most importantly, they increase greenhouse gas emissions through associated forest fires, permanently removing carbon sink capacities, decreasing climate change resilience of the affected area and substantially reducing its biodiversity. Deforestation alone accounts for 11 % of greenhouse gas emissions.
The existing EU legislative framework focuses on tackling illegal logging and associated trade and does not address deforestation directly. Therefore, this new draft regulation set out measures to address Union-driven deforestation and forest degradation.
CONTENT: this proposal aims to curb deforestation and forest degradation that is provoked by EU consumption and production. It lays down rules regarding the placing and making available on the Union market, as well as the export from the Union market, of cattle, cocoa, coffee, oil palm, soya and wood (‘relevant commodities’) and products, as listed in Annex I, that contain, have been fed with or have been made using relevant commodities (‘relevant products), with a view to:
- minimising the Union’s contribution to deforestation and forest degradation worldwide;
- reducing the European Union’s contribution to greenhouse gas emissions and global biodiversity loss.
The definition of deforestation-free sets a cut-off date of 31 December 2020. This means that no commodities and products in the scope of the regulation would be allowed to enter or exit the EU market if they were produced on land subject to deforestation or forest degradation after that date.
Due diligence and enhanced scrutiny
In order to achieve the objective of minimising the EU’s contribution to deforestation and forest degradation, the proposal lays down a tiered, mandatory due diligence system, relying on a deforestation-free definition, combined with a benchmarking system to assess countries and their level of risk of deforestation and forest degradation driven by the commodities in the scope of the regulation. The benchmarking system will assign each country or parts thereof one of three possible levels of risk: low, standard and high risk. The objective of this system is to incentivise countries to ensure stronger forests protection and governance, to facilitate trade and to better calibrate enforcement efforts by helping competent authorities to focus resources where they are most needed, and to reduce companies’ compliance costs.
Competent authorities should carry out the risk analysis of due diligence statements by electronic data processing techniques integrated in the information system.
When relevant commodities and products are sourced from a country or parts thereof that has been assessed as high risk according to the country benchmarking system, they are subject to enhanced scrutiny by the relevant competent authorities. Competent authorities should ensure that the checks they carry out on an annual basis cover at least 15% of the operators, as well as 15% of the quantity of relevant commodities and products produced in high-risk countries or parts thereof.
The proposal also stipulates that operators should collect the geographic coordinates of the land where the commodities they place on the market were produced. This strict traceability is meant to ensure that only deforestation-free products enter the EU market – and that enforcement authorities in Member States have the necessary means to control that this is the case.
Penalties
The proposal establishes the obligation of Member States to lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation. These may include fines, the confiscation of the relevant commodities and products as well as the confiscation of revenues, the suspension or prohibition of relevant economic activities and the exclusion from public procurement processes for the operators and traders that violate the Regulation.
Reporting
Member States should make available to the public and the Commission, at the latest by 30 April of each year, information on the application of this Regulation during the previous calendar year. This information shall include their plans for checks, the number and the results of the controls carried out on operators and traders, including the contents of these checks, the volume of relevant commodities and products checked in relation to the total quantity of relevant commodities and products placed on the market, the countries of origin and of production of relevant commodities and products as well as the measures taken in case of non-compliance and the costs of controls recovered.
The Commission services should make publicly available, on an annual basis, a Union-wide overview of the application of this Regulation.
Budgetary implications
A total budget of EUR 16 519 000 is foreseen for the setting up and implementation of the Regulation during the first five years of operation (provisionally foreseen from 2023 to 2027.) This includes a budget of EUR 6 650 000 under Heading 7 of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for human resources and other administrative expenses. It also includes a budget of EUR 9 869 000 under Heading 3 of the MFF. The latter is linked to support various implementation tasks related to the legislative provisions that will be carried out by Commission services from 2022 to 2027, including procurement and potential administrative arrangements.
Documents
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: EP(2023)000229
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE740.655
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T9-0311/2022
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A9-0219/2022
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE731.737
- Committee opinion: PE730.020
- Committee opinion: PE731.537
- Committee opinion: PE719.797
- Committee opinion: PE719.876
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE731.628
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE731.704
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE731.626
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE730.104
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE731.627
- Reasoned opinion: PE730.012
- Committee draft report: PE729.953
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES5690/2021
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2021)0395
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2021)0396
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2021)0325
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2021)0326
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2021)0327
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2021)0328
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2021)0329
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2021)0706
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SEC(2021)0395
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SEC(2021)0396
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2021)0325
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2021)0326
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2021)0327
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2021)0328
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2021)0329
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES5690/2021
- Committee draft report: PE729.953
- Reasoned opinion: PE730.012
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE730.104
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE731.627
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE731.626
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE731.628
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE731.704
- Committee opinion: PE719.876
- Committee opinion: PE719.797
- Committee opinion: PE731.537
- Committee opinion: PE730.020
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE731.737
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: EP(2023)000229
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE740.655
Activities
- Christophe HANSEN
Plenary Speeches (3)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- 2022/09/13 Deforestation Regulation (A9-0219/2022 - Christophe Hansen) (vote)
- Othmar KARAS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Stanislav POLČÁK
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Clara AGUILERA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Maria ARENA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Adam BIELAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Pascal CANFIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Martin HÄUSLING
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Anja HAZEKAMP
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Seán KELLY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Norbert LINS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Angelika NIEBLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Tomasz Piotr PORĘBA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Michaela ŠOJDROVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Henna VIRKKUNEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Clare DALY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Nicolae ŞTEFĂNUȚĂ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Alexander BERNHUBER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Anna CAVAZZINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Benoît LUTGEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Mick WALLACE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Michal WIEZIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Edina TÓTH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Anna ZALEWSKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Marie TOUSSAINT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Sylwia SPUREK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Rosanna CONTE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Aurélia BEIGNEUX
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Hildegard BENTELE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)
- Delara BURKHARDT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2022/09/12 Deforestation Regulation (debate)