Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | CONT | GARCÍA MUÑOZ Isabel ( S&D) | LENAERS Jeroen ( EPP), MITUȚA Alin ( Renew), PEKSA Mikuláš ( Verts/ALE), KUHS Joachim ( ID), FLANAGAN Luke Ming ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | JURI | ||
Committee Opinion | LIBE | STRUGARIU Ramona ( Renew) | Malin BJÖRK ( GUE/NGL) |
Lead committee dossier:
Subjects
Events
The European Parliament decided by 589 votes to 11, with 42 abstentions, to grant discharge to the European Data Protection Supervisor in respect of the implementation of its budget for the financial year 2020.
Parliament noted that the Court of Auditors had not found any significant weaknesses in respect of the audited topics related to human resources and procurement for the European Data Protection Supervisor. The Court found, based on its audit work, that the payments for the financial year 2020 for the administrative expenditure of the institutions, including those of the Supervisor, are, on the whole, free from material error . No specific problems concerning the regularity of transactions were detected by the Court.
In its resolution, adopted by 577 votes to 17 with 44 abstentions, Parliament made the following observations.
Budgetary and financial management
In 2020, the Supervisor was allocated a budget of EUR 19 476 998 , representing an increase of 16.3 % compared to the 2019 budget of EUR 16 638 572. The increase was mainly due to the impact of the new tasks set out in General Data Protection Regulation for the EU institutions
and the new supervisory responsibilities in connection with enforcement and judicial cooperation agencies, such as, amongst others, the European Prosecutor's Office and Eurojust.
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact on budget implementation (73 % in 2020, compared to 91.97 % in 2019). This impact is visible on the mission and training budgets (execution of less than 17 %) and on the organisation of meetings, including experts’ reimbursement and catering (execution of less than 15 %) resulting in savings of EUR 2 183 000, which represents 11 % of the overall budget consumption.
As human resources costs represent a significant part of the overall budget, the delay in recruitment procedures (another consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic) had a negative impact on the execution of the overall budget.
The Supervisor’s investment in its digital transformation at least partially compensated the low budget execution rate as the IT-related budget lines for the Supervisor and the EDPB exceeded the initial allocation (109 %).
Internal management, performance, internal control
Parliament welcomed the adoption of the new management tool - called ‘Bluebell’ - developed by the European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA), which allows better forecasting and monitoring of the actual implementation of budget lines based on data uploaded by the operational units. It welcomed the fact that in 2020, working methods had been adapted following the COVID-19 pandemic and that all paper-based signatures and procedures had been digitised. In addition, physical meetings have been replaced by cheaper and less time-consuming online meetings.
Human resources, staff well-being and gender equality
In 2020, the Supervisor had a total of 113 staff members, compared to 96 in 2019. Parliament noted the very low occupation rate of 86.90% of the establishment plan.
Parliament noted the favourable trend in the geographical distribution of the staff as a whole, which represented 20 Member States in 2020, given the size of the institution. It called on the EDPS to continue to pay attention to issues of gender balance, equal opportunities and geographical distribution, in particular during selection procedures.
In 2019 and 2020, the gender balance remained constant in the staff overall, at around 58% women and 42% men. At middle management level, the figures remain the same as in 2019, with 75% women and 25% men. As in 2019, the two senior management positions are occupied by men.
The Supervisor offers a range of working arrangements and all officers benefit from flexible working hours, with the exception of those receiving a management allowance. The Supervisor’s staff have made extensive use of teleworking as a flexibility tool to ensure business continuity and to manage the difficult conditions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Parliament noted that no cases of harassment were reported in 2020 and appreciated that in December 2020 the Supervisor signed a revision of his anti-harassment decision to clarify the rights and obligations of each party.
Ethical framework and transparency
Parliament noted that the Supervisor’s ethical framework was updated in 2019, requiring all new starters to attend a mandatory presentation on the subject during their initial training. The code of conduct for staff members was revised in December 2019 to bring it into line with changes in the institution and the new legal framework, and to include staff members of the Secretariat.
The EDPS does not currently use the inter-institutional Transparency Register but publishes the agenda and interventions of the Supervisor on its website, including meetings with interest representatives, to ensure accountability towards citizens; encourages the Supervisor to explore ways to link its own register to the Transparency Register.
Digitalisation, cyber security, data protection
Parliament noted that the Supervisor attaches importance to analysing the opportunities, risks and challenges that innovative technologies may pose for data protection and the personal data of individuals. It recognises the role of the EDPS in the global debate on digital ethics, in particular regarding the development of artificial intelligence and facial recognition technologies.
In December 2020, the Supervisor signed an SLA with CERT-EU (Computer Emergency Response Team for the EU institutions, bodies and agencies) on the provision of a wider range of cyber security services. Members welcomed the appointment of a full-time Data Protection Officer in September 2020 to strengthen its capacity to monitor personal data processing activities.
Parliament noted that in 2020, despite the COVID-19 pandemic, the Supervisor was able to offer several training sessions to many EU institutions to advise them on how to protect individuals' personal data.
Members believe that the Supervisor's participation in a number of international fora is crucial to shape and share best practice and create consistent procedures based on a common understanding of data protection rules.
COVID pandemic
Parliament underlined the crucial role of the Supervisor in protecting personal data and privacy, two fundamental rights in the Union, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly the relevance and influence of its assessment of compliance with data protection of the numerous contact tracing and warning apps widespread during the pandemic. It acknowledged the additional workload that has faced the Supervisor and appreciated that the Supervisor had not only ensured business continuity, but also increased its productivity.
PURPOSE: presentation by the Commission of the consolidated annual accounts of the European Union for the financial year 2020, as part of the 2020 discharge procedure.
Analysis of the accounts of the EU Institutions: European Data Protection Supervisor
The consolidated annual accounts of the EU provide financial information on the activities of the institutions, agencies and other bodies of the EU from an accrual accounting and budgetary perspective. They are prepared according to the highest available international public sector standards.
The discharge is a Parliament decision that reflects its conclusions at the end of a process, the discharge procedure, on the way the Commission (and other institutions and bodies) has carried out its task of implementing the EU budget.
The decision is based in particular on the European Court of Auditors reports, in particular its annual report, in which the Court provides a Statement of Assurance (DAS) on the legality and regularity of transactions (payments and commitments).
Implementation of the EDPS’s appropriations for the financial year 2020
The EDPS was allocated a budget of EUR 19 476 998 . This represents an increase of 16.3% compared to the 2019 budget. The overall increase was mainly due to the impact of the new tasks resulting from the European Data Protection Regulation 1725/2018 and the new supervisory tasks in connection with enforcement and judicial cooperation agencies (e.g. EPPO, Eurojust).
As regards budget implementation, the overall rate in commitment appropriations amounted to 73%. This rate is substantially lower than the previous year due to the impact of COVID-19 related restrictions on the Institution’s activities.
The EDPS’s activities in 2020 were marked by :
- the COVID-19 pandemic. The EDPS had to adapt its working methods as an employer, but also its priorities since COVID- 19 strengthened the call for the protection of individuals’ privacy with the appearance of contact tracing apps and other technologies used for the fight against the coronavirus. While technology can certainly contribute to limiting the spread of the virus, the EDPS’ priority is to ensure the protection of individuals’ personal data and right to privacy;
- the new Strategy for 2020-2024 whose overarching aim is to shape a safer digital future, with three core pillars outlining the guiding actions and objectives for the organisation to the end of 2024: Foresight, Action and Solidarity;
- the start of the implementation of a new budget management tool, Bluebell.
Documents
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0152/2022
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0086/2022
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0086/2022
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06001/2022
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE703.199
- Committee opinion: PE700.430
- Committee draft report: PE699.019
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 430 25.10.2021, p. 0007
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: N9-0043/2022
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2021)0381
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Court of Auditors: opinion, report: OJ C 430 25.10.2021, p. 0007 N9-0043/2022
- Committee draft report: PE699.019
- Committee opinion: PE700.430
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE703.199
- Supplementary non-legislative basic document: 06001/2022
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0086/2022
Votes
Décharge 2020: budget général de l'UE - Contrôleur européen de la protection des données - Discharge 2020: EU general budget - European Data Protection Supervisor - Entlastung 2020: Gesamthaushaltsplan der EU – Europäischer Datenschutzbeauftragter - A9-0086/2022 - Isabel García Muñoz - Proposition de décision #
A9-0086/2022 - Isabel García Muñoz - Proposition de résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
25 |
2021/2114(DEC)
2021/12/07
LIBE
25 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Regrets that the Court of Auditors’ (the Court’s) report on the implementation of the budget concerning the financial year 2020 does not contain any remarks about the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS); notes especially in this regard the positive continued growth of the EDPS in the financial year in question, in terms of both financial and human resources, allowing EDPS to fulfil its mandate;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Highlights the key role of the EDPS in the Union justice and home affairs framework, ensuring the full respect for the right of privacy and data protection; notes the numerous unparalleled questions the EDPS was faced with in its supervisory role with regards to the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (the EPPO); appreciates the support offered by the EDPS to the EPPO with regards to the establishment of its personal data processing rules, as well as the support offered to other Union agencies within the justice and home affairs framework, such as Europol and Eurojust;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Highlights the important position the EDPS has had and still enjoys in the creation of the framework for the issuance, verification and acceptance of interoperable COVID-19 vaccination, test and recovery certificates (the EU Digital COVID Certificate) to facilitate free movement during the COVID-19 pandemic; notes that the EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 04/2021 on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a framework for the issuance, verification and acceptance of interoperable certificates on vaccination, testing and recovery is of crucial value for the assessment of fundamental rights and the protection of personal data;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Underlines the importance of achieving an appropriate balance between protecting the right to privacy and personal data and ensuring proper access to documents of public interest; highlights the essential supervisory and advisory role that the EDPS fulfils for the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies in this regard; stresses that achieving this goal has become even more relevant following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Notes furthermore that at the end of 2019, a new supervisory framework for the processing of personal data at Eurojust came into force, under which the EDPS is responsible for monitoring Eurojust's compliance with the applicable Union rules on data protection; welcomes in that regard the close cooperation between the EDPS and Eurojust throughout the year 2020;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the EDPS response to the new privacy and data protection challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic, namely immediately establishing an internal task force to
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the EDPS response to the new privacy and data protection challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic, namely immediately establishing an internal task force to actively monitor, undertake actions and assess governmental and private responses to the outbreak;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Welcomes the sustained commitment of the EDPS to generating and fostering global partnerships in the field of data protection through the organisation of a yearly, dedicated workshop to data protection in collaboration with international organisations; welcomes the EDPS’ initiative to address the specific challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic in the 2020 edition of that workshop, such as the protection of personal health data, contact tracing apps and the impact of remote working;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Opposes compulsory vaccination against Covid-19, which amounts to a disproportionate violation of privacy;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Welcomes that the list of appointed financial actors was completed to increase the degree of business continuity for financial operations and that a new authorising officer was appointed to facilitate timely payment validation and payment contracting when management is prevented;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4 c. Notes that according to Regulation (EU) 2018/1725, a single model of coordinated supervision of data protection rules for Union large-scale IT systems and agencies will replace the current model of individual supervision coordination groups; highlights the active part played by the EDPS in this process;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the EDPS Strategy 2020-2024 and the supervisory and advisory role that the EDPS fulfils, especially sharing knowledge on monitoring Union institutions’ compliance with the “Schrems II” judgement1 in relation to transfers of personal data to third countries
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Welcomes the EDPS Strategy 2020-2024 and the supervisory and advisory role that the EDPS fulfils, especially sharing knowledge on monitoring Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies’ compliance with the “Schrems II” judgement1 in relation to transfers of personal data to
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Welcomes the 2020 annual report published by the EDPS; welcomes the fact that in 2020 the EDPS met or surpassed the targets set in five out of eight key performance indicators; notes that in 2020, 72.97 % of the EDPS's allocated budget was implemented, a lower figure compared to 2019 (92 %) and below the 2020 target (90 %); acknowledges the EDPS's explanation that that is mainly due to the COVID-19 crisis, which significantly affected its activities;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Notes the 2020 annual report published by the EDPS in April 2021; appreciates the insight given on all EDPS activities;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Welcomes the Procurement Process Guide published on the EDPS intranet in order to provide EDPS staff with detailed guidance on different procurement procedures;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5 c. Welcomes the ongoing efforts of the EDPS to becoming a paperless institution, including the continuation of paperless interviews in 2020, the intention to automate appraisal, probation and evaluation reports via the implementation of new modules in the human resources interface in 2021, and the implementation in 2020 of paperless finance systems with respect to the processing of payments, budget management and procurement;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Welcomes that spending on ‘Administration’ was free from material error according to the Court's annual reports on the implementation of the EU budget for the 2020 financial year;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the EDPS is not a decentralised Union agency; regrets the Court’s position that the small budget of the EDPS, its low volume of financial transactions and the low level of assessed risks do not justify the publication of a separate report on EDPS; underlines that the legality and regularity of EDPS transactions should nevertheless, as a matter of principle, be properly examined by the Court as transparency is vital for the appropriate functioning of all Union bodies; asks the Court to issue separate annual activity
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that the EDPS is not a decentralised Union agency;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Welcomes the annual report for 2020 published by the EDPS in April 2021; notes the 17 % increase in its budget compared to 2019; notes that the budgetary execution was substantially lower than the previous year due to COVID-19 related restrictions; appreciates the insights given therein on all EDPS activities in 2020; highlights in particular EDPS' cooperation with the European Data Protection Board;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Welcomes the rollout of the new budget management tool in the last quarter of 2020 with a view to improving the efficiency of budget preparation and subsequent monitoring of implementation;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Highlights the key role of the EDPS in
source: 700.694
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
events/4/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
docs/0 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0152_EN.html
|
docs/5 |
|
events/5/summary |
|
procedure/subject/8.70.03.10 |
2020 discharge
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/5 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/3/docs |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
procedure/subject/8.70.03.10 |
2020 discharge
|
forecasts |
|
forecasts |
|
events/3 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
docs/3 |
|
events/2 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-AM-703199_EN.html
|
docs/2/date |
Old
2022-01-31T00:00:00New
2022-02-01T00:00:00 |
docs/2 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/1/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-700430_EN.html
|
docs/1/date |
Old
2022-01-13T00:00:00New
2022-01-14T00:00:00 |
docs/1 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CONT-PR-699019_EN.html
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/1/opinion |
False
|
commission |
|
events/0/summary |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|