2021/2255(INI) The New European Bauhaus
Lead committee dossier:
Progress: Awaiting committee decision
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Joint Responsible Committee | ['ITRE', 'CULT'] | EHLER Christian ( EPP), ROS SEMPERE Marcos ( S&D) | ZOVKO Željana ( EPP), TOIA Patrizia ( S&D), LØKKEGAARD Morten ( Renew), MIHAYLOVA Iskra ( Renew), CUFFE Ciarán ( Verts/ALE), RIBA I GINER Diana ( Verts/ALE), DA RE Gianantonio ( ID), LIZZI Elena ( ID), MELBĀRDE Dace ( ECR), BARRENA ARZA Pernando ( GUE/NGL), ERNST Cornelia ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | EMPL | MANDERS Antonius ( EPP) | Romeo FRANZ ( Verts/ALE), Konstantinos ARVANITIS ( GUE/NGL), Jordi CAÑAS ( RE), Manuel PIZARRO ( S&D), Beata SZYDŁO ( ECR), Elena LIZZI ( ID) |
Committee Opinion | BUDG | OLBRYCHT Jan ( EPP) | Martina DLABAJOVÁ ( RE), Henrike HAHN ( Verts/ALE), Joachim KUHS ( ID), Bogdan RZOŃCA ( ECR), Ilan DE BASSO ( S&D) |
Committee Opinion | REGI | MICHELS Martina ( GUE/NGL) | Raffaele FITTO ( ECR), Laurence FARRENG ( RE), Ciarán CUFFE ( Verts/ALE), Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA ( PPE), Hannes HEIDE ( S&D) |
Committee Opinion | TRAN |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 57, RoP 58
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 57, RoP 58Events
2022/01/13
EP - EHLER Christian (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in ['ITRE', 'CULT']
2022/01/13
EP - ROS SEMPERE Marcos (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in ['ITRE', 'CULT']
2021/12/16
EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2021/12/16
EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2021/12/16
EP - Referral to joint committee announced in Parliament
2021/12/16
EP - OLBRYCHT Jan (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2021/10/25
EP - MANDERS Antonius (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in EMPL
2021/09/27
EP - MICHELS Martina (GUE/NGL) appointed as rapporteur in REGI
Activities
- Christian EHLER
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Eva KAILI
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Seán KELLY
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Antonius MANDERS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Martina MICHELS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Iskra MIHAYLOVA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Stanislav POLČÁK
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Patrizia TOIA
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Rainer WIELAND
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Roberts ZĪLE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Željana ZOVKO
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Juozas OLEKAS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Laurence FARRENG
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Diana RIBA I GINER
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Alexis GEORGOULIS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Ciarán CUFFE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Eugen TOMAC
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Hannes HEIDE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Pernille WEISS
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Elżbieta KRUK
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Marcos ROS SEMPERE
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Ilan DE BASSO
Plenary Speeches (0)
Amendments | Dossier |
19 |
2021/2255(INI)
2022/02/07
BUDG
19 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Considers that the New European Bauhaus (NEB) can help deliver the European Green Deal, achieving climate neutrality by 2050 at the latest, promoting just green and digital transition of the European economy, as well as fighting the biodiversity crisis through the intersection of art and culture; emphasises the importance of ensuring coherence with legislative and programming instruments and a level of ambition that is in line with EU’s climate commitments, by adding a strong cultural and creative dimension;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Highlights that the NEB is funded from several programmes under the multiannual financial framework (MFF), in particular Horizon Europe and the European Regional Development Fund, with other programmes, such as Creative Europe and Erasmus+, playing an important supporting role; stresses that the NEB must not erode funding for core programme objectives as agreed by the legislator nor divert focus from agreed political priorities;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that the NEB should have a separate line of funding so as not to affect that of other ongoing programmes; calls on the Commission to reflect on the volume of funding needed for the objectives set, identify the financial resources in the budget and submit proposals for NEB funding;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines that the NEB’s success will also hinge on its ability to attract
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines that the NEB’s success will also hinge on its ability to attract national public and private investment; stresses the importance of making regional and local authorities aware of this initiative so that they can access the corresponding opportunities and funding; calls on the Commission to develop a clear plan for achieving this aim, including through its role in the operational programmes and partnership agreements under cohesion policy and in the national recovery and resilience plans under the Recovery and Resilience Facility;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines that the NEB’s success will also hinge on its ability to attract national public and private investment; calls on the Commission to develop and present to the Parliament a clear plan for achieving this aim, including through its role in the operational programmes and partnership agreements under cohesion policy and in the national recovery and resilience plans under the Recovery and Resilience Facility;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Emphasises that the preparatory action on the ‘New European Bauhaus Knowledge Management Platform’ in the 2022 budget can help streamline guidance and share information on funding opportunities for prospective applicants and can be further expanded from 2023; notes a lack of communication regarding the proposed NEB objectives and opportunities and calls on the Commission and Member States to endeavour to promote the project among European citizens;
Amendment 16 #
5. Emphasises that the preparatory action on the ‘New European Bauhaus Knowledge Management Platform’ in the 2022 budget can help streamline guidance and share information on funding opportunities for prospective applicants and can be further expanded from 2023; stresses the need to ensure that circularity and sustainable criteria for building materials are at the heart of the selection for pilot projects;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to conduct a thorough impact assessment of the NEB at the end of the pilot phase; underlines that
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission to conduct a thorough impact assessment of the NEB at the end of the pilot phase, including an assessment of its contribution to the achievement of the Union’s Green Deal objectives and its effectiveness in promoting synergies between the different Union programmes; underlines that, if continued, the NEB must be designed to ensure democratic oversight and safeguard the role of the budgetary authority; insists that any decision to develop the NEB into a longer-term initiative or programme requires fresh resources as part of the necessary mid-term revision of the MFF.
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls on the Commission
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Considers that the New European Bauhaus (NEB) can help deliver the European Green Deal by adding a strong cultural and creative dimension; stresses that the NEB must include all Member States of the European Union and be accessible to all citizens, including those in small urban, rural and other remote or isolated areas;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Considers that the New European Bauhaus (NEB) can help deliver the European Green Deal by adding a strong cultural and creative dimension by bringing together environmental and social sustainability, inclusion and aesthetics in the places where people live and in the way they live;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Recalls that buildings are responsible for 40% of the EU’s energy demand, are the single largest energy consumer in Europe and account for 36% of the EU’s CO2 emissions; stresses that, in line with the European Green Deal, the NEB should focus on preparing our current building stock and infrastructure for a more sustainable and climate- friendly future; emphasises that conservation and preservation of monuments and culturally relevant historic buildings should be taken into account;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the New European Bauhaus initiative, which bridges the worlds of science and technology, art and culture to efficiently address societal issues and build sustainable and inclusive living spaces, but notes with concern that a coherent and strategic approach for the financing of the initiative is still lacking; Notes that while funding in the EU budget for the NEB pilot phase in 2021-22 totals some EUR 85 million, the scale and provenance of financing from 2023 onwards remains unclear; regrets the fact that, contrary to Parliament’s long-standing position, fresh resources have not been committed for what is a new initiative; considers also that the mere re- deployment of existing funds may not be sufficient to achieve the objectives of this initiative and emphasises the need for new funds;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that while funding in the EU budget for the NEB pilot phase in 2021-22 totals some EUR 85 million, the scale and provenance of financing from 2023 onwards remains unclear; regrets the fact that, contrary to Parliament’s long-standing position, fresh resources have not been committed for what is a new initiative; calls on the European Commission to ensure that all categories of beneficiary in every Member State have access to the resources and results available from the pilot phase; calls on the Commission to introduce a pronounced educational component in the implementation of the pilot phase;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that while funding in the EU budget for the NEB pilot phase in 2021-22 totals some EUR 85 million, the scale and provenance of financing from 2023 onwards remains unclear; asks the Commission to clarify its budgetary approach for continuation of the NEB after the pilot phase; regrets the fact that, contrary to Parliament’s long-standing position, fresh resources have not been committed yet for what is a new initiative;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that while funding in the EU budget for the NEB pilot phase in 2021-22 totals some EUR 85 million, the scale and provenance of financing from 2023 onwards remains unclear;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Highlights that the NEB is funded from several programmes under the multiannual financial framework (MFF), in particular Horizon Europe and the European Regional Development Fund, with other programmes, such as Creative Europe and Erasmus+, playing an important supporting role;
source: 704.871
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
2022-03-03Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
docs |
|
2022-01-29Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
commission |
|
2022-01-22Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0/shadows/9 |
|
2022-01-15Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
2022-01-14Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
2021-12-22Show (3) Changes
events |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |