BETA


2021/3006(RSP) Resolution on the draft Commission implementing decision renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified cotton GHB614 (BCS-GHØØ2-5) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ENVI PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa (icon: EPP EPP), SIDL Günther (icon: S&D S&D), HÄUSLING Martin (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), HAZEKAMP Anja (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 112-p2

Events

2022/06/13
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2022/02/15
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2022/02/15
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2022/02/15
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 477 votes to 207, with 15 abstentions, a resolution on the draft Commission implementing decision renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified cotton GHB614 (BCS-GHØØ2-5) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

On 22 April 2020, BASF SE, based in Germany, on behalf of BASF Agricultural Solutions Seeds US LLC, based in the United States submitted to the Commission an application for the renewal of that authorisation for the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified cotton GHB614.

On 28 May 2021, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) adopted a favourable opinion on this renewal application.

Lack of assessment of the complementary herbicide

Members pointed out that several studies have shown that genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops lead to an increase in the use of ‘complementary’. GM cotton may therefore be exposed more frequently to higher doses of glyphosate, which could lead to an increase in the amount of residues in the harvest.

A number of recent scientific peer-reviewed studies confirm the carcinogenic potential of glyphosate.

Furthermore, the assessment of residues of herbicides and their breakdown products found on GM plants is considered to be outside the remit of the EFSA GMO Panel. It is therefore not undertaken a part of the GMO authorisation process.

Comments from Member States' competent authorities

Members recalled thatMember States have submitted numerous critical comments to EFSA, including that:

- in the absence of any real surveillance system making it possible to specifically trace the consumption of GMOs or their by-products by humans or by animals, it is not possible to draw any pertinent lessons on the safety of consuming GMOs from the ten-year period;

- the monitoring reports (2011 to 2019) have many deficiencies and are neither in line with Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and the corresponding guidelines nor with 2011 EFSA guidance on the post-market environmental monitoring of genetically modified plants;

- the presented literature analysis submitted by the applicant was incomplete and that spraying the GM cotton with higher concentrations of glyphosate is likely to result in more herbicide residues and metabolites on the crops.

Undemocratic decision-making

Members noted that no opinion was given in the December 2021 vote in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, meaning that the authorisation was not supported by a qualified majority of Member States.

The Commission recognised that it is problematic that decisions on the authorisation of GMOs continue to be adopted by the Commission without a qualified majority of Member States in favour, which is largely the exception for product authorisations as a whole, but has become the norm for decision-making on authorisations of GM food and GM feed.

Recommendations

On the basis of these considerations, Parliament considered that the Commission's implementing decision was not consistent with Union law and called for it to be withdrawn.

The Commission is also called upon to:

- not to authorise herbicide-tolerant GM crops until the health risks related to residues have been thoroughly investigated on a case-by-case basis, which requires a full residue assessment of the spraying of these GM crops with complementary herbicides, an assessment of herbicide breakdown products and any combinatorial effects, including with the GM plant itself;

- take into account the Union’s obligations under international agreements, such as the Paris Climate Agreement, the UN CBD and the UN SDGs and ensure that the draft implementing acts explain how they uphold the principle of ‘do no harm’;

- not to authorise the import for food or feed purposes of any genetically modified plant that has been rendered tolerant to a herbicide active substance not authorised for use in the EU.

Parliament expressed its disappointment that the Commission has since continued to authorise GMOs for import into the Union, despite ongoing objections by Parliament and a majority of Member States voting against.

Documents
2021/12/02
   EP - PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2021/12/02
   EP - SIDL Günther (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2021/12/02
   EP - HÄUSLING Martin (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2021/12/02
   EP - HAZEKAMP Anja (GUE/NGL) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI

Documents

Activities

Votes

Objection formulée conformément à l'article 112, paragraphes 2 et 3, du règlement intérieur: Coton génétiquement modifié GHB614 (BCS-GHØØ2-5) - Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3): Genetically modified cotton GHB614 (BCS-GHØØ2-5) - Einwand gemäß Artikel 112 Absätze 2 und 3 GO: genetisch veränderte Baumwolle der Sorte GHB614 (BCS-GHØØ2-5) - B9-0094/2022 - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) #

2022/02/15 Outcome: +: 477, -: 207, 0: 15
FR IT PL EL HU AT HR PT BE DE ES SK BG SI CY LV FI LU MT LT DK EE IE NL CZ SE RO
Total
79
75
52
21
21
19
12
21
20
95
59
13
17
8
6
8
14
6
5
11
13
7
13
29
21
21
33
icon: S&D S&D
144

Greece S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Estonia S&D

2

Czechia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
72

Poland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Portugal Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Ireland Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3
icon: ID ID
66
3

Finland ID

2

Denmark ID

For (1)

1

Estonia ID

For (1)

1

Netherlands ID

Against (1)

1

Czechia ID

2
icon: NI NI
40

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

3

Slovakia NI

2

Lithuania NI

1
icon: The Left The Left
39

Belgium The Left

For (1)

1

Cyprus The Left

2

Finland The Left

For (1)

1

Denmark The Left

1

Netherlands The Left

For (1)

1

Czechia The Left

1

Sweden The Left

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
64

Greece ECR

1

Croatia ECR

1

Germany ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

1
3

Romania ECR

1
icon: Renew Renew
100

Italy Renew

Against (1)

3

Poland Renew

1

Hungary Renew

2

Austria Renew

Against (1)

1

Croatia Renew

For (1)

1

Belgium Renew

4

Slovenia Renew

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Latvia Renew

Against (1)

1

Finland Renew

3

Luxembourg Renew

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Lithuania Renew

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia Renew

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Ireland Renew

2

Sweden Renew

3
icon: PPE PPE
174

Hungary PPE

1

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Slovakia PPE

4
2

Latvia PPE

2

Finland PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

2

Malta PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/1
date
2022-06-13T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=57708&j=0&l=en title: SP(2022)192
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/1
date
2022-02-15T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0025_EN.html title: T9-0025/2022
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
body
EP
events/0
date
2022-02-15T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0025_EN.html title: T9-0025/2022
events/0
date
2022-02-15T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=57708&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/1
date
2022-02-15T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0025_EN.html title: T9-0025/2022
events/1/summary
  • The European Parliament adopted by 477 votes to 207, with 15 abstentions, a resolution on the draft Commission implementing decision renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified cotton GHB614 (BCS-GHØØ2-5) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
  • On 22 April 2020, BASF SE, based in Germany, on behalf of BASF Agricultural Solutions Seeds US LLC, based in the United States submitted to the Commission an application for the renewal of that authorisation for the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified cotton GHB614.
  • On 28 May 2021, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) adopted a favourable opinion on this renewal application.
  • Lack of assessment of the complementary herbicide
  • Members pointed out that several studies have shown that genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops lead to an increase in the use of ‘complementary’. GM cotton may therefore be exposed more frequently to higher doses of glyphosate, which could lead to an increase in the amount of residues in the harvest.
  • A number of recent scientific peer-reviewed studies confirm the carcinogenic potential of glyphosate.
  • Furthermore, the assessment of residues of herbicides and their breakdown products found on GM plants is considered to be outside the remit of the EFSA GMO Panel. It is therefore not undertaken a part of the GMO authorisation process.
  • Comments from Member States' competent authorities
  • Members recalled thatMember States have submitted numerous critical comments to EFSA, including that:
  • - in the absence of any real surveillance system making it possible to specifically trace the consumption of GMOs or their by-products by humans or by animals, it is not possible to draw any pertinent lessons on the safety of consuming GMOs from the ten-year period;
  • - the monitoring reports (2011 to 2019) have many deficiencies and are neither in line with Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and the corresponding guidelines nor with 2011 EFSA guidance on the post-market environmental monitoring of genetically modified plants;
  • - the presented literature analysis submitted by the applicant was incomplete and that spraying the GM cotton with higher concentrations of glyphosate is likely to result in more herbicide residues and metabolites on the crops.
  • Undemocratic decision-making
  • Members noted that no opinion was given in the December 2021 vote in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, meaning that the authorisation was not supported by a qualified majority of Member States.
  • The Commission recognised that it is problematic that decisions on the authorisation of GMOs continue to be adopted by the Commission without a qualified majority of Member States in favour, which is largely the exception for product authorisations as a whole, but has become the norm for decision-making on authorisations of GM food and GM feed.
  • Recommendations
  • On the basis of these considerations, Parliament considered that the Commission's implementing decision was not consistent with Union law and called for it to be withdrawn.
  • The Commission is also called upon to:
  • - not to authorise herbicide-tolerant GM crops until the health risks related to residues have been thoroughly investigated on a case-by-case basis, which requires a full residue assessment of the spraying of these GM crops with complementary herbicides, an assessment of herbicide breakdown products and any combinatorial effects, including with the GM plant itself;
  • - take into account the Union’s obligations under international agreements, such as the Paris Climate Agreement, the UN CBD and the UN SDGs and ensure that the draft implementing acts explain how they uphold the principle of ‘do no harm’;
  • - not to authorise the import for food or feed purposes of any genetically modified plant that has been rendered tolerant to a herbicide active substance not authorised for use in the EU.
  • Parliament expressed its disappointment that the Commission has since continued to authorise GMOs for import into the Union, despite ongoing objections by Parliament and a majority of Member States voting against.
docs/1
date
2022-02-15T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0025_EN.html title: T9-0025/2022
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
body
EP
events
  • date: 2022-02-15T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0025_EN.html title: T9-0025/2022
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting plenary debate/vote
New
Procedure completed
docs
  • date: 2022-02-15T00:00:00 docs: url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2022-0094_EN.html title: B9-0094/2022 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
forecasts
  • date: 2022-02-15T00:00:00 title: Vote in plenary scheduled
procedure/title
Old
Objection pursuant to Rule 112(2) and (3) renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified cotton GHB614 (BCS-GHØØ2-5)
New
Resolution on the draft Commission implementing decision renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified cotton GHB614 (BCS-GHØØ2-5) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council