BETA


Events

2023/04/18
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2023/04/18
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 323 votes to 257, with 59 abstentions, a resolution on sustainable carbon cycles.

General considerations

The resolution stressed that the impact of natural and industrial carbon removal solutions on balancing GHG emissions is limited and should not come at the expense of ambitious climate mitigation goals, which require a substantial reduction in emissions. It underlined the EU’s objective to prioritise swift and predictable emission reductions and, at the same time, enhance removal by natural sinks.

Members recognised that the Sustainable Carbon Cycle Initiative can contribute to the EU's goal of net carbon removals. They are also aware of the need to avoid double counting and safeguard the integrity of removals.

Parliament cautions against many IPCC scenarios that rely heavily on future CO2 removals. It considered that, given the many uncertainties related to those technologies and the risks that most of them entail for land use, water resources, biodiversity protection and food security, priority should be given to scenarios that minimise the use of CO2 removals, such as low energy demand scenarios. It called on the EU Independent Advisory Board on Climate Change to prioritise those scenarios when assessing what could be a 1.5°C compatible GHG emissions budget for the EU, and to carefully consider the use of CO2 removal options and technologies in a socially, environmentally and economically conscious manner.

The resolution stressed that the EU should aim to achieve negative emissions as well as emission reductions. While welcoming the Commission's plan on how carbon offsets can help achieve net negative emissions, Members called on the Commission to define a list of practices with the highest absorption potential , which is important for farmers, and to invest more in developing accessible and affordable carbon-removal technologies. Members stressed that removals should be counted towards a separate removal target to ensure that they do not slow down economy-wide decarbonisation efforts.

Parliament stressed that agriculture and forestry should play a significant role in achieving the EU carbon removal target for the land-use sector and, like all economic sectors, should contribute to the EU’s climate neutrality goal; underlines that healthy natural ecosystems can constitute an important source of long-term removals;

Carbon farming

According to the resolution, the growing interest in carbon farming should be an opportunity for farmers to transform their business model and should allow for better rewards for farmers who engage in a transition to sustainable agroecological agroforestry practices. Members considered that carbon farming should be developed on the basis of a credible and effective policy framework , taking into account the need for a clear set of rules for farmers and foresters who decide to implement carbon farming practices.

The resolution stressed the need to keep in mind the different starting points of Member States and farmers and insisted on the need to ensure equitable opportunities for farmers and foresters in carbon farming across the EU.

Parliament asked the Commission to make available to land managers verified emission and removal data , based on a farm level and a result-based approach, well before 2026, in order to be used in the expected legislative proposal for sustainable food systems as well as in the upcoming revision of the common agricultural policy.

Blue carbon

Stressing that the blue carbon economy has great potential to contribute to CO2 storage in coastal regions, the resolution encouraged the Commission to collect more data on blue carbon sequestration and storage.

Members recalled the need to map marine and freshwater ecosystems. They reaffirmed Parliament's position on extending the scope of the Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) regulation to include greenhouse gas emissions and removals from marine, coastal and freshwater ecosystems, and to apply specific targets to these emissions and removals.

CCS and CCU

Members considered that technologies such as direct air capture that are combined with permanent storage and are scientifically proven and environmentally safe can play a role in helping achieve climate neutrality in the EU by no later than 2050. Emissions reduction at source must always remain the priority.

The resolution highlighted that solutions based on CO2 capture and storage (CCS) and CO2 capture and utilisation (CCU) technologies can play a role in decarbonisation, especially for the mitigation of process emissions in industry, for those Member States that opt for these technologies. The Commission is urged to put in place an efficient and reliable system of traceability of captured CO2 , distinguishing between carbon capture on site and from the atmosphere to avoid double counting and to safeguard the integrity of removals.

Members noted that carbon storage is not allowed in all Member States and that Member States are free to decide whether or not to authorise the geological storage of CO2 on their territory. They called on the Commission and Member States to sufficiently document the long-term effects of carbon storage in areas with geological storage capacity and to support research to obtain more data on the overall environmental impact, energy efficiency, social acceptability, economic costs and risk of leakage and geological perturbations, before its large-scale deployment.

New regulatory framework for certification of carbon removals

Parliament took note of the Commission proposal for a regulation on establishing an EU certification framework for carbon removals and the Commission’s intention to put in place a framework for the identification of activities that unambiguously remove carbon from the atmosphere. It stressed that this new monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) framework should be the basis of further measures to incentivise those new types of carbon removal activities.

Funding carbon cycling

Parliament called on the Commission to review current funding options to reward practices with scientifically proven climate and environmental benefits that lead to long-term and sustainable increase in carbon sequestration in soils and other biogenic carbon pools while ensuring societal co-benefits. Research and innovation concerning sustainable carbon cycles should be encouraged and financed, using different EU financial instruments, such as the LIFE and Horizon Europe programmes or the Innovation Fund.

Knowledge sharing and cooperation

The resolution highlighted the need for increased cooperation, exchange of information and sharing of best practices between stakeholders to promote better knowledge and understanding of opportunities and risks in the implementation of carbon cycling initiatives. International cooperation with third countries and international institutions should be encouraged to promote sustainable carbon removals at the global level.

Documents
2023/04/17
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2023/03/21
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted an own-initiative report by Alexander BERNHUBER (EPP, AT) on sustainable carbon cycles.

General considerations

In its communication on sustainable carbon cycles, published on 14 December 2021, the Commission proposes sustainable solutions for increasing carbon removals from the atmosphere. If the EU is to offset the effects of its CO2 emissions, it will have to significantly reduce its dependence on fossil carbon, upscale carbon farming to store more carbon in nature and promote industrial solutions to sustainably and verifiably remove and recycle carbon. Removing and storing more carbon, from the atmosphere, oceans and coastal wetlands, is essential to achieve the EU’s legally binding commitment to become climate neutral by 2050, as outlined in the European Green Deal.

The report stressed that the EU should aim to achieve negative emissions as well as emission reductions . While welcoming the Commission's plan on how carbon offsets can help achieve net negative emissions, Members called on the Commission to define a list of practices with the highest absorption potential, which is important for farmers, and to invest more in developing accessible and affordable carbon-removal technologies. Members stressed that removals should be counted towards a separate removal target to ensure that they do not slow down economy-wide decarbonisation efforts.

The report stressed that agriculture and forestry should play a significant role in achieving the EU's carbon removal target for the land-use sector and, like all economic sectors, should contribute to the EU's climate neutrality objective. Healthy natural ecosystems can be an important source of long-term removals.

Carbon farming

The report stressed that the growing interest in carbon farming should be an opportunity for farmers to transform their business model and should allow for better rewards for farmers who engage in a transition to sustainable agroecological agroforestry practices. Carbon farming can be a voluntary activity. Therefore, financial rewards for carbon farming should compensate farmers and foresters for additional efforts beyond their obligations under EU and Member State legislation.

Members considered that carbon farming should be developed on the basis of a credible and effective policy framework , taking into account the need for a clear set of rules for farmers and foresters who decide to implement carbon farming practices.

The report stressed the need to keep in mind the different starting points of Member States and farmers, and insisted on the need to ensure equitable opportunities for farmers and foresters in carbon farming across the EU. It calls for the integration of carbon farming into the forthcoming CAP national strategy plans, in line with Member States' assessments and needs.

Blue carbon

Stressing that the blue carbon economy has great potential to contribute to CO2 storage in coastal regions, the report encouraged the Commission to collect more data on blue carbon sequestration and storage.

Members recalled the need to map marine and freshwater ecosystems. They reaffirmed Parliament's position on extending the scope of the Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) regulation to include greenhouse gas emissions and removals from marine, coastal and freshwater ecosystems, and to apply specific targets to these emissions and removals.

CCS and CCU

Members believe that more needs to be done to significantly reduce the environmental footprint of current carbon capture technologies, particularly with regard to energy and water use.

The report highlighted that solutions based on CO2 capture and storage (CCS) and CO2 capture and utilisation (CCU) technologies can play a role in decarbonisation, especially for the mitigation of process emissions in industry, for those Member States that opt for these technologies. The Commission is urged to put in place an efficient and reliable system of traceability of captured CO2 , distinguishing between carbon capture on site and from the atmosphere to avoid double counting and to safeguard the integrity of removals.

Members noted that carbon storage is not allowed in all Member States and that Member States are free to decide whether or not to authorise the geological storage of CO2 on their territory. They called on the Commission and Member States to sufficiently document the long-term effects of carbon storage in areas with geological storage capacity and to support research to obtain more data on the overall environmental impact, energy efficiency, social acceptability, economic costs and risk of leakage and geological perturbations, before its large-scale deployment.

Funding carbon cycling

Members recalled that public funding under CAP, revenues generated by the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and funds from other EU programmes such as LIFE, the Cohesion Fund, Horizon Europe, the Recovery and Resilience Facility and the Just Transition Fund, can already support carbon sequestering and biodiversity-positive approaches in forests and agricultural lands and should be further targeted for that purpose.

The report called on the Commission to review current funding options to reward practices with scientifically proven climate and environmental benefits that lead to long-term and sustainable increase in carbon sequestration in soils and other biogenic carbon pools while ensuring societal co-benefits. Research and innovation concerning sustainable carbon cycles should be encouraged and financed, using different EU financial instruments, such as the LIFE and Horizon Europe programmes or the Innovation Fund.

Knowledge sharing and cooperation

The report highlighted the need for increased cooperation, exchange of information and sharing of best practices between stakeholders to promote better knowledge and understanding of opportunities and risks in the implementation of carbon cycling initiatives. The Commission and Member States should promote knowledge transfer through targeted training and education programmes, along with access to advisory services to increase the uptake of carbon farming by land managers, farmers and foresters. International cooperation with third countries and international institutions should be encouraged to promote sustainable carbon removals at the global level.

Documents
2023/03/01
   EP - Vote in committee
2022/10/27
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2022/10/27
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2022/08/30
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2022/08/30
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2022/07/07
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2022/07/07
   EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2022/06/15
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2022/06/08
   EP - HLAVÁČEK Martin (Renew) appointed as rapporteur in AGRI
2022/06/06
   EP - KELLY Seán (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE
2022/04/25
   EP - BERNHUBER Alexander (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI

Documents

Votes

Cycles durables du carbone - A9-0066/2023 - Alexander Bernhuber - § 17 - Am 4 #

2023/04/18 Outcome: +: 324, -: 298, 0: 22
PL RO IT CZ HU DE MT BG HR SI SE LT IE LV CY BE FI AT LU NL EL EE SK DK PT FR ES
Total
47
27
71
20
20
91
5
14
12
8
21
9
13
8
3
19
12
17
6
28
10
6
14
14
20
73
56
icon: PPE PPE
158

Hungary PPE

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Slovakia PPE

Abstain (1)

4

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Germany ECR

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Croatia ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ID ID
58

Czechia ID

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Austria ID

3

Estonia ID

Against (1)

1

Denmark ID

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
39

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Latvia NI

Against (1)

1

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: Renew Renew
97

Poland Renew

1

Italy Renew

3

Hungary Renew

2

Bulgaria Renew

3

Croatia Renew

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Renew

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Sweden Renew

For (1)

3

Lithuania Renew

Against (1)

1

Ireland Renew

2

Latvia Renew

Against (1)

1

Finland Renew

Against (1)

3

Austria Renew

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Renew

2

Greece Renew

Against (1)

1

Estonia Renew

3
icon: The Left The Left
34

Czechia The Left

1

Sweden The Left

Against (1)

1

Ireland The Left

4

Cyprus The Left

2

Belgium The Left

Against (1)

1

Finland The Left

Against (1)

1

Netherlands The Left

Against (1)

1
3

Denmark The Left

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
68

Poland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Romania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

3

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Ireland Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

3
icon: S&D S&D
130

Czechia S&D

Against (1)

1
4

Bulgaria S&D

For (1)

4

Slovenia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Latvia S&D

2

Belgium S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Greece S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

A9-0066/2023 - Alexander Bernhuber - § 29 - Am 6 #

2023/04/18 Outcome: -: 325, +: 305, 0: 16
PL IT HU RO SE DE HR LV BE LT CZ AT SI BG FI CY EE SK LU MT IE DK EL PT NL FR ES
Total
47
71
20
27
21
92
12
8
19
9
20
17
8
14
12
3
6
14
6
5
13
14
10
20
28
73
57
icon: PPE PPE
158

Hungary PPE

1

Finland PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Slovakia PPE

Abstain (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

2

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: ID ID
58

Czechia ID

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2
3

Estonia ID

For (1)

1

Denmark ID

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Germany ECR

1

Croatia ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Finland ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Abstain (1)

5
icon: NI NI
39

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Latvia NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

2

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1
icon: The Left The Left
33

Sweden The Left

Against (1)

1

Belgium The Left

Against (1)

1

Czechia The Left

Against (1)

1

Finland The Left

Against (1)

1

Cyprus The Left

2

Ireland The Left

4

Denmark The Left

Against (1)

1
3

Netherlands The Left

Against (1)

1
icon: Renew Renew
98

Poland Renew

1

Italy Renew

3

Hungary Renew

2
3

Croatia Renew

Against (1)

1

Latvia Renew

For (1)

1

Lithuania Renew

Against (1)

1

Austria Renew

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Renew

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Bulgaria Renew

3

Finland Renew

Against (1)

3

Estonia Renew

3

Luxembourg Renew

2

Ireland Renew

2

Greece Renew

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
68

Poland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

3

Romania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Ireland Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Spain Verts/ALE

3
icon: S&D S&D
132

Latvia S&D

2

Belgium S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Czechia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Greece S&D

Against (1)

1

A9-0066/2023 - Alexander Bernhuber - § 33 - Am 7 #

2023/04/18 Outcome: -: 324, +: 312, 0: 6
IT PL RO HU HR SI BE LT AT BG LV CY FI EE DK LU CZ SK EL MT IE SE PT DE NL FR ES
Total
70
47
27
20
12
8
19
9
17
14
8
3
12
6
12
6
20
14
10
5
13
21
19
92
28
74
56
icon: PPE PPE
157

Hungary PPE

1

Cyprus PPE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Slovakia PPE

Abstain (1)

4

Malta PPE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

1

Sweden ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Germany ECR

1
icon: ID ID
57
3

Estonia ID

For (1)

1

Denmark ID

For (1)

1

Czechia ID

Against (2)

2
icon: NI NI
39

Latvia NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

2

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1
icon: The Left The Left
33

Belgium The Left

Against (1)

1

Cyprus The Left

2

Finland The Left

Against (1)

1

Czechia The Left

Against (1)

1
3

Ireland The Left

4

Sweden The Left

Against (1)

1

Netherlands The Left

Against (1)

1
icon: Renew Renew
97

Italy Renew

For (1)

3

Poland Renew

1

Hungary Renew

2

Croatia Renew

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Renew

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Lithuania Renew

Against (1)

1

Austria Renew

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria Renew

3

Latvia Renew

Against (1)

1

Finland Renew

Against (1)

3

Estonia Renew

3

Luxembourg Renew

2

Greece Renew

Against (1)

1

Ireland Renew

2

Sweden Renew

For (1)

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
68

Italy Verts/ALE

3

Poland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Romania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Ireland Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Spain Verts/ALE

3
icon: S&D S&D
131

Slovenia S&D

2

Belgium S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Latvia S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Czechia S&D

Against (1)

1

Greece S&D

Against (1)

1

A9-0066/2023 - Alexander Bernhuber - Considérant P - Am 2 #

2023/04/18 Outcome: -: 328, +: 292, 0: 20
PL IT RO HU SI HR LT IE LV LU BG SE MT CY BE SK FI EE AT CZ EL DK PT NL DE ES FR
Total
46
71
27
18
8
12
9
13
8
6
13
21
5
3
19
14
12
6
17
20
10
14
19
28
92
56
73
icon: PPE PPE
156

Hungary PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

For (1)

1

Slovakia PPE

Abstain (1)

4

Finland PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Romania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Germany ECR

1
icon: ID ID
58

Estonia ID

For (1)

1

Austria ID

3

Czechia ID

Against (2)

2

Denmark ID

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
36

Croatia NI

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

France NI

For (1)

3
icon: The Left The Left
34

Ireland The Left

4

Sweden The Left

Against (1)

1

Cyprus The Left

2

Belgium The Left

Against (1)

1

Finland The Left

Against (1)

1

Czechia The Left

Against (1)

1
3

Denmark The Left

Against (1)

1

Netherlands The Left

Against (1)

1
icon: Renew Renew
98

Poland Renew

1

Italy Renew

3

Hungary Renew

2

Slovenia Renew

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Croatia Renew

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Renew

Against (1)

1

Ireland Renew

2

Latvia Renew

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Renew

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Bulgaria Renew

3

Sweden Renew

For (1)

3

Finland Renew

Against (1)

3

Estonia Renew

3

Austria Renew

Against (1)

1

Greece Renew

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
68

Poland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

3

Romania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Ireland Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Spain Verts/ALE

3
icon: S&D S&D
130

Slovenia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Latvia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1
4

Belgium S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Czechia S&D

Against (1)

1

Greece S&D

Against (1)

1

A9-0066/2023 - Alexander Bernhuber - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) #

2023/04/18 Outcome: +: 323, -: 257, 0: 59
IT RO HU PL BG DK CZ SK SI BE LT LV LU FI EE FR IE HR ES AT MT CY NL SE EL PT DE
Total
71
25
20
46
14
14
20
14
8
19
9
7
6
12
6
73
13
12
56
17
5
3
27
21
10
20
91
icon: PPE PPE
154

Hungary PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Finland PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

For (1)

1
icon: Renew Renew
97

Hungary Renew

2

Poland Renew

1

Slovenia Renew

2

Lithuania Renew

1

Latvia Renew

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Renew

2

Finland Renew

3

Estonia Renew

3

Ireland Renew

2

Croatia Renew

For (1)

1

Austria Renew

For (1)

1
3

Greece Renew

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden ECR

3

Germany ECR

1
icon: ID ID
58

Denmark ID

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia ID

Against (2)

2

Estonia ID

Against (1)

1

Austria ID

3
icon: NI NI
38

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Abstain (1)

3

Croatia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: The Left The Left
34

Denmark The Left

Against (1)

1

Czechia The Left

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium The Left

Against (1)

1

Finland The Left

Against (1)

1

Ireland The Left

4

Cyprus The Left

2

Netherlands The Left

Against (1)

1

Sweden The Left

Against (1)

1
3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
68

Italy Verts/ALE

3

Romania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Poland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
130

Czechia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Belgium S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1
4

Greece S&D

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
764 2022/2053(INI)
2022/07/14 ITRE 81 amendments...
source: 735.485
2022/07/22 AGRI 188 amendments...
source: 734.120
2022/08/30 ENVI 495 amendments...
source: 735.539

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/5
date
2023-04-18T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2023-0104_EN.html title: T9-0104/2023
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
body
EP
events/5
date
2023-04-18T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2023-0104_EN.html title: T9-0104/2023
events/5
date
2023-04-18T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=59683&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/6
date
2023-04-18T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2023-0104_EN.html title: T9-0104/2023
events/6/summary
  • The European Parliament adopted by 323 votes to 257, with 59 abstentions, a resolution on sustainable carbon cycles.
  • General considerations
  • The resolution stressed that the impact of natural and industrial carbon removal solutions on balancing GHG emissions is limited and should not come at the expense of ambitious climate mitigation goals, which require a substantial reduction in emissions. It underlined the EU’s objective to prioritise swift and predictable emission reductions and, at the same time, enhance removal by natural sinks.
  • Members recognised that the Sustainable Carbon Cycle Initiative can contribute to the EU's goal of net carbon removals. They are also aware of the need to avoid double counting and safeguard the integrity of removals.
  • Parliament cautions against many IPCC scenarios that rely heavily on future CO2 removals. It considered that, given the many uncertainties related to those technologies and the risks that most of them entail for land use, water resources, biodiversity protection and food security, priority should be given to scenarios that minimise the use of CO2 removals, such as low energy demand scenarios. It called on the EU Independent Advisory Board on Climate Change to prioritise those scenarios when assessing what could be a 1.5°C compatible GHG emissions budget for the EU, and to carefully consider the use of CO2 removal options and technologies in a socially, environmentally and economically conscious manner.
  • The resolution stressed that the EU should aim to achieve negative emissions as well as emission reductions. While welcoming the Commission's plan on how carbon offsets can help achieve net negative emissions, Members called on the Commission to define a list of practices with the highest absorption potential , which is important for farmers, and to invest more in developing accessible and affordable carbon-removal technologies. Members stressed that removals should be counted towards a separate removal target to ensure that they do not slow down economy-wide decarbonisation efforts.
  • Parliament stressed that agriculture and forestry should play a significant role in achieving the EU carbon removal target for the land-use sector and, like all economic sectors, should contribute to the EU’s climate neutrality goal; underlines that healthy natural ecosystems can constitute an important source of long-term removals;
  • Carbon farming
  • According to the resolution, the growing interest in carbon farming should be an opportunity for farmers to transform their business model and should allow for better rewards for farmers who engage in a transition to sustainable agroecological agroforestry practices. Members considered that carbon farming should be developed on the basis of a credible and effective policy framework , taking into account the need for a clear set of rules for farmers and foresters who decide to implement carbon farming practices.
  • The resolution stressed the need to keep in mind the different starting points of Member States and farmers and insisted on the need to ensure equitable opportunities for farmers and foresters in carbon farming across the EU.
  • Parliament asked the Commission to make available to land managers verified emission and removal data , based on a farm level and a result-based approach, well before 2026, in order to be used in the expected legislative proposal for sustainable food systems as well as in the upcoming revision of the common agricultural policy.
  • Blue carbon
  • Stressing that the blue carbon economy has great potential to contribute to CO2 storage in coastal regions, the resolution encouraged the Commission to collect more data on blue carbon sequestration and storage.
  • Members recalled the need to map marine and freshwater ecosystems. They reaffirmed Parliament's position on extending the scope of the Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) regulation to include greenhouse gas emissions and removals from marine, coastal and freshwater ecosystems, and to apply specific targets to these emissions and removals.
  • CCS and CCU
  • Members considered that technologies such as direct air capture that are combined with permanent storage and are scientifically proven and environmentally safe can play a role in helping achieve climate neutrality in the EU by no later than 2050. Emissions reduction at source must always remain the priority.
  • The resolution highlighted that solutions based on CO2 capture and storage (CCS) and CO2 capture and utilisation (CCU) technologies can play a role in decarbonisation, especially for the mitigation of process emissions in industry, for those Member States that opt for these technologies. The Commission is urged to put in place an efficient and reliable system of traceability of captured CO2 , distinguishing between carbon capture on site and from the atmosphere to avoid double counting and to safeguard the integrity of removals.
  • Members noted that carbon storage is not allowed in all Member States and that Member States are free to decide whether or not to authorise the geological storage of CO2 on their territory. They called on the Commission and Member States to sufficiently document the long-term effects of carbon storage in areas with geological storage capacity and to support research to obtain more data on the overall environmental impact, energy efficiency, social acceptability, economic costs and risk of leakage and geological perturbations, before its large-scale deployment.
  • New regulatory framework for certification of carbon removals
  • Parliament took note of the Commission proposal for a regulation on establishing an EU certification framework for carbon removals and the Commission’s intention to put in place a framework for the identification of activities that unambiguously remove carbon from the atmosphere. It stressed that this new monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) framework should be the basis of further measures to incentivise those new types of carbon removal activities.
  • Funding carbon cycling
  • Parliament called on the Commission to review current funding options to reward practices with scientifically proven climate and environmental benefits that lead to long-term and sustainable increase in carbon sequestration in soils and other biogenic carbon pools while ensuring societal co-benefits. Research and innovation concerning sustainable carbon cycles should be encouraged and financed, using different EU financial instruments, such as the LIFE and Horizon Europe programmes or the Innovation Fund.
  • Knowledge sharing and cooperation
  • The resolution highlighted the need for increased cooperation, exchange of information and sharing of best practices between stakeholders to promote better knowledge and understanding of opportunities and risks in the implementation of carbon cycling initiatives. International cooperation with third countries and international institutions should be encouraged to promote sustainable carbon removals at the global level.
docs/5
date
2023-04-18T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2023-0104_EN.html title: T9-0104/2023
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
body
EP
events/4/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-9-2023-04-17-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
events/5
date
2023-04-18T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2023-0104_EN.html title: T9-0104/2023
forecasts
  • date: 2023-04-18T00:00:00 title: Vote in plenary scheduled
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament's vote
New
Procedure completed
events/4
date
2023-04-17T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
forecasts/0
date
2023-04-17T00:00:00
title
Debate in plenary scheduled
forecasts/1
date
2023-04-18T00:00:00
title
Vote in plenary scheduled
docs/5
date
2023-03-21T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0066_EN.html title: A9-0066/2023
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
events/3/summary
  • The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted an own-initiative report by Alexander BERNHUBER (EPP, AT) on sustainable carbon cycles.
  • General considerations
  • In its communication on sustainable carbon cycles, published on 14 December 2021, the Commission proposes sustainable solutions for increasing carbon removals from the atmosphere. If the EU is to offset the effects of its CO2 emissions, it will have to significantly reduce its dependence on fossil carbon, upscale carbon farming to store more carbon in nature and promote industrial solutions to sustainably and verifiably remove and recycle carbon. Removing and storing more carbon, from the atmosphere, oceans and coastal wetlands, is essential to achieve the EU’s legally binding commitment to become climate neutral by 2050, as outlined in the European Green Deal.
  • The report stressed that the EU should aim to achieve negative emissions as well as emission reductions . While welcoming the Commission's plan on how carbon offsets can help achieve net negative emissions, Members called on the Commission to define a list of practices with the highest absorption potential, which is important for farmers, and to invest more in developing accessible and affordable carbon-removal technologies. Members stressed that removals should be counted towards a separate removal target to ensure that they do not slow down economy-wide decarbonisation efforts.
  • The report stressed that agriculture and forestry should play a significant role in achieving the EU's carbon removal target for the land-use sector and, like all economic sectors, should contribute to the EU's climate neutrality objective. Healthy natural ecosystems can be an important source of long-term removals.
  • Carbon farming
  • The report stressed that the growing interest in carbon farming should be an opportunity for farmers to transform their business model and should allow for better rewards for farmers who engage in a transition to sustainable agroecological agroforestry practices. Carbon farming can be a voluntary activity. Therefore, financial rewards for carbon farming should compensate farmers and foresters for additional efforts beyond their obligations under EU and Member State legislation.
  • Members considered that carbon farming should be developed on the basis of a credible and effective policy framework , taking into account the need for a clear set of rules for farmers and foresters who decide to implement carbon farming practices.
  • The report stressed the need to keep in mind the different starting points of Member States and farmers, and insisted on the need to ensure equitable opportunities for farmers and foresters in carbon farming across the EU. It calls for the integration of carbon farming into the forthcoming CAP national strategy plans, in line with Member States' assessments and needs.
  • Blue carbon
  • Stressing that the blue carbon economy has great potential to contribute to CO2 storage in coastal regions, the report encouraged the Commission to collect more data on blue carbon sequestration and storage.
  • Members recalled the need to map marine and freshwater ecosystems. They reaffirmed Parliament's position on extending the scope of the Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) regulation to include greenhouse gas emissions and removals from marine, coastal and freshwater ecosystems, and to apply specific targets to these emissions and removals.
  • CCS and CCU
  • Members believe that more needs to be done to significantly reduce the environmental footprint of current carbon capture technologies, particularly with regard to energy and water use.
  • The report highlighted that solutions based on CO2 capture and storage (CCS) and CO2 capture and utilisation (CCU) technologies can play a role in decarbonisation, especially for the mitigation of process emissions in industry, for those Member States that opt for these technologies. The Commission is urged to put in place an efficient and reliable system of traceability of captured CO2 , distinguishing between carbon capture on site and from the atmosphere to avoid double counting and to safeguard the integrity of removals.
  • Members noted that carbon storage is not allowed in all Member States and that Member States are free to decide whether or not to authorise the geological storage of CO2 on their territory. They called on the Commission and Member States to sufficiently document the long-term effects of carbon storage in areas with geological storage capacity and to support research to obtain more data on the overall environmental impact, energy efficiency, social acceptability, economic costs and risk of leakage and geological perturbations, before its large-scale deployment.
  • Funding carbon cycling
  • Members recalled that public funding under CAP, revenues generated by the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and funds from other EU programmes such as LIFE, the Cohesion Fund, Horizon Europe, the Recovery and Resilience Facility and the Just Transition Fund, can already support carbon sequestering and biodiversity-positive approaches in forests and agricultural lands and should be further targeted for that purpose.
  • The report called on the Commission to review current funding options to reward practices with scientifically proven climate and environmental benefits that lead to long-term and sustainable increase in carbon sequestration in soils and other biogenic carbon pools while ensuring societal co-benefits. Research and innovation concerning sustainable carbon cycles should be encouraged and financed, using different EU financial instruments, such as the LIFE and Horizon Europe programmes or the Innovation Fund.
  • Knowledge sharing and cooperation
  • The report highlighted the need for increased cooperation, exchange of information and sharing of best practices between stakeholders to promote better knowledge and understanding of opportunities and risks in the implementation of carbon cycling initiatives. The Commission and Member States should promote knowledge transfer through targeted training and education programmes, along with access to advisory services to increase the uptake of carbon farming by land managers, farmers and foresters. International cooperation with third countries and international institutions should be encouraged to promote sustainable carbon removals at the global level.
forecasts/0/title
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
docs/5
date
2023-03-21T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0066_EN.html title: A9-0066/2023
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
events/3/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0066_EN.html title: A9-0066/2023
docs/5
date
2023-03-21T00:00:00
docs
title: A9-0066/2023
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
events/3/docs
  • title: A9-0066/2023
docs/5
date
2023-03-21T00:00:00
docs
title: A9-0066/2023
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
events/3
date
2023-03-21T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
title: A9-0066/2023
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament's vote
docs/5
date
2023-03-01T00:00:00
docs
title: PE742.507
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/5
date
2023-03-01T00:00:00
docs
title: PE742.507
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
events/2
date
2023-03-01T00:00:00
type
Vote in committee
body
EP
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
forecasts
  • date: 2023-04-17T00:00:00 title: Indicative plenary sitting date
forecasts
  • date: 2023-02-13T00:00:00 title: Indicative plenary sitting date
forecasts
  • date: 2023-02-13T00:00:00 title: Indicative plenary sitting date
forecasts
  • date: 2023-02-13T00:00:00 title: Indicative plenary sitting date
docs/4/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-734179_EN.html
forecasts/0/date
Old
2022-12-12T00:00:00
New
2023-02-13T00:00:00
docs/3/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AD-732867_EN.html
docs/3/date
Old
2022-10-26T00:00:00
New
2022-10-27T00:00:00
docs/4
date
2022-10-27T00:00:00
docs
title: PE734.179
committee
ITRE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/3
date
2022-10-26T00:00:00
docs
title: PE732.867
committee
AGRI
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
forecasts
  • date: 2022-12-12T00:00:00 title: Indicative plenary sitting date
docs/1/date
Old
2022-08-29T00:00:00
New
2022-08-30T00:00:00
docs/2/date
Old
2022-08-29T00:00:00
New
2022-08-30T00:00:00
docs/1/date
Old
2022-08-26T00:00:00
New
2022-08-29T00:00:00
docs/2/date
Old
2022-08-26T00:00:00
New
2022-08-29T00:00:00
docs/1/date
Old
2022-07-20T00:00:00
New
2022-08-26T00:00:00
docs/2/date
Old
2022-07-20T00:00:00
New
2022-08-26T00:00:00
docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AM-735539_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AM-735540_EN.html
docs/1
date
2022-07-20T00:00:00
docs
title: PE735.539
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/2
date
2022-07-20T00:00:00
docs
title: PE735.540
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP