BETA

24 Amendments of Constance LE GRIP related to 2015/0287(COD)

Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) This Directive should fully harmonise a set of key rules that are so far not regulated at Union level. It should include therefore rules on conformity of the digital content, remedies available to consumers in cases of lack of conformity of digital content with the contract and certain modalities for the exercise of those remedies. This Directive should also harmonise certain aspects concerning the right to terminate a long term contract, as well as certain aspects concerning the modification of the digital content, without undermining pricing policies which reward consumers for their loyalty or the supplier's efforts to continuously improve content.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 26
(26) Due to its nature digital content needs to interact with other digital equipment to function properly; interoperability should therefore form a part of the conformity criteria. In particular, it needs to interact with the hardware including, taking account of the processor speed and graphics card features, and software, including athe specific version of the operating system or specificthe kind of multi- media player. The notion of functionality should refer to the ways in which digital content can be used; and how well that content performs in a particular digital environment. it should also refer to the absence or presence of any technical restrictions such as protection via Digital Rights Management or regional coding.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 32
(32) Due to the specific nature of digital content with its high complexity as well as the supplier's better knowledge and access to know how, technical information and high-tech assistance and ability to identify more easily the third parties who hold the information, it is the supplier who is in a better position than the consumer to know the reasons for the digital content not being in conformity with the contract. The supplier is also in a better position to assess whether the lack of conformity with the contract is due to incompatibility of the consumer's digital environment with the technical requirements for the digital content. Therefore in case of a dispute it should be for the supplier to prove that the digital content is in conformity with the contract, unless the supplier proves that the consumer's digital environment is not compatible with the digital content. Only where the supplier proves that the consumer's digital environment is not compatible with the interoperability and other technical requirements, it should be for the consumer to prove that the digital content is not in conformity with the contract.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 37
(37) As a second step, the consumer should be entitled to have the price reduced or the contract terminated. The right of a consumer to have the contract terminated should be limited to those cases where for instance bringing the digital content to conformity is not possible and the non- conformity impairs the main performance features of the digital content. Where the consumer terminates the contract, the supplier should reimburse the price paid by the consumer or, where the digital content is supplied not in exchange for a price but against access to data provided by the consumer, the supplier should refrain from using it, from transferring that data to third parties or allowing third parties to access it after termination of the contract. Fulfilling the obligation to refrain from using data should mean in the case when the counter- performance consists of personal data, that the supplier should take all measures in order to comply with data protection rules by deleting it or rendering it anonymous in such a way that the consumer cannot be identified by any means likely reasonably to be used either by the supplier or by any other person. Without prejudice to obligations of a controller under Directive 95/46/EC the supplier should not be obliged to undertake any further steps in relation to data which the supplier has lawfully provided to third parties in the course of the duration of the contract for the supply of the digital content.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 348 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 45
(45) Due to technological or other reasons the supplier might be compelled to change features of the digital content supplied over a period of time. These changes are often to the advantage of the consumer as they improve the digital content. Consequently, the parties to the contract may include respective clauses in the contract which allow the supplier to undertake modifications. However, where such modifications negatively affect the way the consumer benefits from main performance features of the digital content, giving rise to a danger that they may disturb the balance of the contract or the nature of the performance due under the contract to an extent that the consumer may not have concluded such a contract. Therefore, in such cases these modifications, they should be subject to certain conditions.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
(a) data which is produced and supplied in digital form, for example video, audio, applications, digital games and any other software,
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 402 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3
3. 'supplier' means any natural or legal person, irrespective of whether privately or publicly owned, who is acting, including through any other person acting in his name or on his behalf, for purposes relating to that person’s trade, business, craft, or professionby an act of supply is providing access to digital content or making digital content available;
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 426 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9
9. 'interoperability' means the ability of digital content to perform all its functionalities in interaction with a concrete digital environment;deleted
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 436 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10
10. 'supply' means providing access to digital content or making digital content available;deleted
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 524 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. When performing the contract for the supply of digital content, the supplier shall supply the digital content to the consumer.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 526 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) the consumer; ordeleted
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 527 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) a third party which operates a physical or virtual facility making the digital content available to the consumer or allowing the consumer to access it and which has been chosen by the consumer for receiving the digital content.deleted
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 532 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. The supplier shall supply the digital content immediately after the conclusion of the contract, unless the parties have agreed otherwise. The supply shall be deemed to take place when the digital content is supplied to the consumer or, where point (b) of paragraph 1 applies, to the third party chosen by the consumer, whichever is the earlier.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 558 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) be of the quantity, quality, duration and version and shall possess functionality, interoperability and other performance and other features such as performance, accessibility, continuity and security, as required by the contract including in any pre-contractual information which forms integral part of the contract;
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 574 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. To the extent that the contract does not stipulate, where relevant, in a clear and comprehensive manner, the requirements for the digital content under paragraph 1, the digital content shall be fit for the purposes for which digital content of the same description would normally be used including its functionality, interoperability and other performance and other features such as performance, accessibility, continuity and security, taking into account:
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 597 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 5
5. In order to conform with the contract the digital content must also meet the requirements of Articles 7 and 8.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 621 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. At the time the digital content is supplied to the consumer, the digital content shall be free ofnot violate any right of a third party, including based on intellectual property, so that the digital content can be used in accordance with the contract.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 628 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. Where the digital content is supplied over a period of time, the supplier shall, for the duration of that period, keepensure that the digital content supplied to the consumer free of anydoes not violate the rights of a third party, including thatose based on intellectual property, so that the digital content can be used in accordance with the contract.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 653 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply where the supplier shows that the digital environment of the consumer is not compatible with interoperability and other technical requirements of the digital content and where the supplier informed the consumer of such requirements before the conclusion of the contract.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 761 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 5
5. The consumer may terminate the contract only if the lack of conformity with the contract impairs functionality, interoperability and other main performance features of the digital content such as its performance, accessibility, continuity and security where required by Article 6 paragraphs (1) and (2). The burden of proof that the lack of conformity with the contract does not impair functionality, interoperability and other main performance features of the digital content shall be on the supplier.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 810 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the supplier shall provide the consumer with technical means to retrieve all content provided by the consumer and any other data produced or generated through the consumer's use of the digital content to the extent that data has been retained by the supplier and is identifiable by the supplier. The consumer shall be entitled to retrieve the content free of charge, without significant inconvenience, in reasonable time and in a commonly used data format;
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 868 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 14 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The provisions of this Article shall be without prejudice to national provisions providing for compensation for any other damage suffered by the consumer as a result of a lack of conformity with the contract or a failure to supply the digital content.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 879 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Where the contract provides that the digital content shall be supplied over the period of time stipulated in the contract, the supplier may alter functionality, interoperability and other main performance features of the digital content such as its performance, accessibility, continuity and security, to the extent those alternations adversely affect access to or use of the digital content by the consumer, only if:
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI
Amendment 927 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 3
3. Where the digital content is supplied in exchange for a payment of a price, the consumer remains liable to pay the part of the price for the digital content supplied corresponding to the period of time before the termination becomes effective. The supplier may, within the limits of the rates offered at the time of conclusion of the contract, adjust the price applicable to the period between the last anniversary of the date of conclusion or prolongation of contract and the date on which termination takes effect.
2017/02/15
Committee: IMCOJURI