45 Amendments of Lucas HARTONG related to 2010/0256(COD)
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
Recital 5
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
Recital 6
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) To that end, notwithstanding Article 28 of the Treaty, imports of certain agricultural products from third countries should not be exempt from the applicable import duties. To take account of their origin and the customs treatment accorded to them under European Union law, products which have entered the Union’s customs territory under inward processing or customs warehousing arrangements shouldmust not be considered as direct imports, for the purpose of granting the benefits of the specific supply arrangements.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
Recital 11
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) Since the quantities covered by the specific supply arrangements are limited to the supply requirements of the outermost regions, this system possibly does not impair the proper functioning of the internal market. Nor should the economic advantages of the specific supply arrangements provoke diversions of trade in the products concerned. Dispatching or exportation of those products from the outermost regions should therefore be prohibited. Nevertheless, the dispatch or export of these products must be authorised if the financial advantage resulting from the specific supply arrangements is reimbursed.
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) However, appropriate measures shouldmay be taken to allow for the necessary restructuring of the sugar processing sector in the Azores. These measures should take into account that in order for the sugar sector on the Azores to be viable, a certain level of production and processing needs to be ensured. Against this background, dispatches of sugar from the Azores to the rest of the Union should be allowed exceptionally to exceed traditional flows for a limited period of five years, subject to progressively reduced annual limits. Given that the quantities that may be re- dispatched will be proportional and limited to the extent strictly necessary for ensuring the viability of local sugar production and processing, such temporary dispatching of sugar from the Azores willould perhaps not adversely affect the internal market of the Union.
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
Recital 15
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
Recital 16
Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) European Union policy to assist local production in the outermost regions has involved a multitude of products and measures for their production, marketing or processing. These measures have not really proved effective and ensured that agriculture continues and develops. The EU should not continue to support these lines of production, which are a key element to ensure the environmental, social and economic equilibrium of the outermost regions. Experience has shown that, as in the case of rural development policy, a closer partnership with local authorities can help to address the particular issues affecting the regions concerned in a more targeted way. Support to promote local production therefore needs to continue by means of the POSEI programmes.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
Recital 19
(19) In order to support the marketing of products from the outermost regions, aidthe regions should be established to assist commercialisation ofncouraged to market theseir products outside of the region in which they are produced. However, this is a task for the regions themselves.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
Recital 20
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 21
Recital 21
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 23
Recital 23
(23) The structures of certain farms or processing and marketing firms in the outermost regions are seriously defective and face specific difficulties. Articles 26(2) and 28(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) therefore provide for more favourable support rates for certain types of investment in the outermost regions.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
Recital 25
(25) Article 39(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 and Annex I thereto determine the maximum annual amounts eligible for agri-environmental payments. To take into account the specific environmental situation of certain very sensitive pasture areas in the Azores and the preservation of the landscape and traditional featureshese amounts should on no account be exceeded, in view of the EU’s desire to cut back heavily ofn agricultural land, in particular the areas of terrace cultivatioexpenditure. Furthermore, in lin Madeira, provision should be made for the possibility, in the case of certain specific measures, of increasing those amounts up to twofolde with the subsidiarity principle, any aid accorded is a matter between the peripheral regions and the national authorities within whose responsibility they fall.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
Recital 26
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
Recital 28
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
Recital 29
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
Recital 31
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
Recital 32
(32) Traditional livestock farming activities should be supported. In order to meet the local consumption needs of the French overseas departments and Madeira, duty-free imports from third countries of male bovine animals intended for fattening should be authorised subject to certain conditions and up to a maximum annual limit by the authorities of the Member States within whose responsibility the peripheral areas in question fall.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 33
Recital 33
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
Recital 34
(34) Tobacco growing is of historical importance in the Canary Islands. Economically speaking, tobacco preparation continues to be one of the chief industrial activities in the region. In social terms, tobacco cultivation is very labour- intensive and carried out by small farms. Since the crop is not sufficiently profitable, however, it is in danger of dying out. Tobacco is currently cultivated on only a small area on the island of La Palma, for the small-scale manufacture of cigars. Spain should therefore be authorised to continue to grant aid, in addition to EU aid, so that this traditional crop can be maintained with a view to supporting the artisanal activity associated with it. In addhe EU has no intention of granting aid to undertakings that are clearly not profitable except with EU aid. EU aid is not intended to be a covert form of state aid to maintain p unfair competition, t. To maintain the manufacture of tobacco products, imports into the Canary Islands of raw and semi-manufactured tobacco should continue to be exempt from customs duty, up to an annual limit of 20 000 tonnes of stripped raw tobacco equivalentthe producers may if they will approach the national authorities.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 35
Recital 35
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
Recital 36
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22
Article 22
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1
Article 22 – paragraph 1
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 3
Article 22 – paragraph 3
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 22 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27
Article 27
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28
Article 28
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1
Article 28 – paragraph 1
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b – introductory part
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b – introductory part
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b – indent 1
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b – indent 1
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b – indent 2
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b – indent 2
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b – indent 3
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b – indent 3
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b – indent 4
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b – indent 4
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b – indent 5
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b – indent 5
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b – indent 6
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b – indent 6
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b – indent 7
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b – indent 7
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b – indent 8
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b – indent 8
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 2
Article 28 – paragraph 2