5 Amendments of Reimer BÖGE related to 2016/2019(BUD)
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Believes that mobile workspaces for Members and support in constituencies should be based on needs and use assessment; insists that no hardware should be provided as the GEA provides sufficient resources for the purchase of state-of-the-art devices; questions the need for developing a private mobile work space for Members as this does not seem to correspond to the way Members and their offices organise themselves;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Reiterates its call to the Bureau on the defConfirms its position on the general expenditure allowance taken in its budgetary resolutions of more precise rules regarding the accountability of the expenditure authorised under the general expenditure allowance, which could include cost effective measures such as Members publishing their spending records, as already practiced by a growing number of Members, and could be accompanied by a simplified system for re-paying the unu29 April 2015 and 28 October 2015; reiterates the appeal for greater transparency regarding the general expenditure allowance for the Members; calls on the Bureau to work on a definition of more precise rules regarding the accountability of the expenditure authorised funds; reiterates that this should not requireer this allowance, without generating additional staff forcosts to Parliament's administration;
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. DeplorNotes that the Bureau has not concluded yet its deliberations on Parliament's mid-term strategy for buildings; reiterates, therefore, once again its call for the new mid-term building strategy to be presented to the Committee on Budgets in time for the preparation of Parliament's reading on the 2017 budget;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Deems that the authorisCalls for more information ofn the study on the renovation of the Paul Henri Spaak (PHS) building should be conditional upon further clarifications, including concerning what different renovation and use options are to be studiedatus quo of the project to renovate the PHS building; requests that the a study on the renovation is launched and examined by the Bureau; expects the Bureau to take into consideration the need for healthy and safe working conditions when setting up the renovation timeframe; asks that the Bureau informs the Committee on Budgets on all steps as soon as available; invites, in this context, the Bureau to lay the groundwork for transforming the PHS building into an exemplary state-of- the-art building in terms of energy efficiency and to promptly proceed with the modernization of the building;