7 Amendments of Heinz K. BECKER related to 2017/2131(INL)
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
Citation 4 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 29 May 2017 on combating anti-Semitism (2017 / 2692 (RSP)),
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point 11 a (new)
Paragraph 1 – point 11 a (new)
(11a) the need to consistently combat anti-Semitism and prosecute anti-Semitic statements and hateful statements against Jews
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – point 10
Annex I – point 10
(10) In recent years the Hungarian Government has extensively used national consultations. On 27 April 2017, the Commission pointed out that the national consultation “Let’s stop Brussels” contained several claims and allegations which were factually incorrect or highly misleading. Nevertheless, the Hungarian Government subsequently continued to have recourse to similar consultations, such as in the case of the so-called “Soros plan” national consultation based again on false statements targeting particularly the person of George Soros and the EU, and inducing hatred towards migrants.
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – point 23 a (new)
Annex I – point 23 a (new)
(23a) In its 2017 report on press freedom the Freedom House raised serious concerns about the freedom of the press in Hungary. This is due to independent media being extorted from the market, partly through acquisition of regional newspapers by government-affiliated owners and creation of government friendly private outlets, as well as selective awarding of advertising contracts by government and state-owned companies, which results in depriving independent media outlets from income. The limited advertisement market and extensive government spending on social advertising encourages media to avoid controversial subjects to maintain good relations with public and private advertisers.
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – point 23 b (new)
Annex I – point 23 b (new)
(23b) Both the Freedom House in its report of 2017 as well as Mertek Media Monitor observe that the government also seeks to control the media through selective allocation of radio broadcasting frequencies. This together with exerting their influence over public broadcasters and raising the profile of friendly private outlets deprives independent media from having a fair access to the market.
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – point 43
Annex I – point 43
(43) In his report following his visit to Hungary, which was published on 16 December 2014, the Council of Europe’s Commissioner for Human Rights indicated that he was concerned about the deterioration of the situation as regards racism and intolerance in Hungary, with anti-Gypsyism being the most blatant form of intolerance, as illustrated by distinctively harsh, including violence targeting Roma people and paramilitary marches and patrolling in Roma-populated villages. He also pointed out that, despite positions taken by the Hungarian authorities to condemn anti-Semitic speech, anti-Semitism is a recurring problem, manifesting itself through hate speech and instances of violence against Jewish persons or property. In addition, in a speech held on 15. March 2018 in Budapest, the Prime Minister of Hungary, Victor Orban, used polemic attacks including clearly anti-Semitic stereotypes against George Soros, that according to the European Parliament`s Anti-Semitism Resolution, which appeals the importance of the IHRA working definition on Anti- Semitism, that serves as a model for all EU citizens, would have been assessed as punishable. In addition, he mentioned a recrudescence of xenophobia targeting migrants, including asylum seekers and refugees, and of intolerance affecting other social groups such as LGBTI persons, the poor and homeless persons. The European Commission against Racism and Xenophobia mentioned similar concerns in its report on Hungary published on 9 June 2015.
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – point 49 a (new)
Annex I – point 49 a (new)
(49a) Hungary, like other EU Member States, should legally enshrine IHRA`s working definition of Anti-Semitism as the basis for criminal, media and educational measures.