10 Amendments of Andrey NOVAKOV related to 2015/2154(DEC)
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Is aware that the move to an increased level of performance auditing cannot be done in a single step, as it is only once the basic legal acts and the budget are drafted with the intention to align policy objectives with qualitative indicators or to produce measurable results that performance audits can move forward to align policy objectives with qualitative indicators; notes, however, that the new result orientation and performance data to be reported by the Member States will increase and national and Commission audits will confirm its reliability;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that the architecture of the Europe 2020 Strategy is extremely complex (comprising five headline targets, seven flagships initiatives and 11 thematic objectives for the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIFs)); regrets that those various tools are not designednotes, however, that 11 thematic objectives were defined in the CPR to translate the politicalEurope 2020 objectives of the strategy into practical operational objectivinto operational objectives within ESIF programmes;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. DeplorNotes the fact that high-level Europe 2020 Strategy targets are not systematically translated into operational objectives in partnership agreements and programmes andCommission position on the role of the Europe 2020 targets and that it does not view it appropriate that they are to be systematically translated into operational objectives in partnership agreements in view of the very different development paths in the Member States; that the Europe 2020 targets were transposed into the 11 thematic objectives by the co legislator; notes that current legislation does not require the European Agricultural Funds for Regional Development (EAFRD) and European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) to be structured around thematic objectives;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. RegretNotes that the potential benefits from achieving synergies between the five ESIFs by placing them under one umbrella of regulatory and management framework and one partnership agreement per Member State have not yet been fully realised and that different rules continue to apply at fund and thus at programme level; stresses that only carefully considered partnership agreements and programmes should be adopted in order to ensure an effective implementation of ESIFs;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. FearExpects that the Commission will not be ablereports on the contribution of the Union budget to the achievement of EU2020 objectives; agrees that it is a challenging task to report consistently on the thematic objectives for all five ESIFs and hence on the contribution of these funds to the Europe 2020 Strategy; Notes that the Commission must bring forward in 2017 the first strategic report on the contribution to the Europe 2020 Strategy;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. RegretNotes that according to the Court, there are inherent weaknesselimitations in the performance framework of the common provisions regulation on structural funds79 , as poor results do not lead toonly clearly measurable output indicators and milestones are considered for the allocation of the loss of the performance reserve for Member States and as the financial sanctions available to the Commission are limited by the legislation agreed; __________________ 79 Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the European Social Fund (ESF), the Cohesion Fund (CF), the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) and laying down general provisions on the ERDF, ESF, CF, EAFRD and EMFF and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006.
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 – introductory part
Paragraph 21 – introductory part
21. Requests that the Commission consider making proposals for the preparation of the post 2020 MFF the earliest possible with a view to:
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 – introductory part
Paragraph 22 – introductory part
22. Asks the Commission to propose to the legislator for the preparation of the post 2020 MFF that:
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 66
Paragraph 66
66. Calls on the Commission to provide more guidance to the Member States so that partnership agreements and OPs transpose moreimplement fully the Europe 2020 Strategy and also implementconsider whether the concept of common result indicators as proposed in the Court’s 2014 annual reportis a viable option;
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 156
Paragraph 156
156. Is concerned that, according to the Court, the Europe 2020 Strategy is not systematically translated through thematic objectives into operational targets in partnership agreements and programmes; notes, however, that it is transposed into operational objectives at ESIF programme level through specific objectives aligned with the 11 thematic objectives; considers that results can only be meaningfully evaluated when thematic objectives and OP are aligned and performance indicators and benchmarks make it possible to measure progress;